Economics 442 Macroeconomic Policy (Spring 2015) 3/23/2015. Instructor: Prof. Menzie Chinn UW Madison

Similar documents
Export and Import Regressions on 2009Q1 preliminary release data Menzie Chinn, 23 June 2009 ( )

Methods for A Time Series Approach to Estimating Excess Mortality Rates in Puerto Rico, Post Maria 1 Menzie Chinn 2 August 10, 2018 Procedure:

Appendixes Appendix 1 Data of Dependent Variables and Independent Variables Period

Hasil Common Effect Model

Santi Chaisrisawatsuk 16 November 2017 Thimpu, Bhutan

Fall 2004 Social Sciences 7418 University of Wisconsin-Madison Problem Set 5 Answers

Appendix. Table A.1 (Part A) The Author(s) 2015 G. Chakrabarti and C. Sen, Green Investing, SpringerBriefs in Finance, DOI /

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 1. 2) descriptive statistics and correlogram. Series: LGCSI Sample 12/31/ /11/2009 Observations 2596

Notes on the Treasury Yield Curve Forecasts. October Kara Naccarelli

Openness and Inflation

Lampiran 1 : Grafik Data HIV Asli

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 2. 2) graphs. 3) unit root tests

The Relationship Between Internet Marketing, Search Volume, and Product Sales. Honors Research Thesis

Employment growth and Unemployment rate reduction: Historical experiences and future labour market outcomes

BEcon Program, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University Page 1/7

Donald Trump's Random Walk Up Wall Street

Supplementary Materials for

LAMPIRAN PERHITUNGAN EVIEWS

LAMPIRAN 1. Retribusi (ribu Rp)

Monetary Economics Portfolios Risk and Returns Diversification and Risk Factors Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015

Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven growth: A panel econometrics approach

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

The Frequency of Wars*

UJI COMMON EFFECT MODEL

Lampiran I Data. PDRB (Juta Rupiah) PMA (Juta Rupiah) PMDN (Juta Rupiah) Tahun. Luas Sawit (ha)

Chapter-3. Sectoral Composition of Economic Growth and its Major Trends in India

Financial Econometrics: Problem Set # 3 Solutions

Can the Taylor Rule Describe the Monetary Policy in China?

Kabupaten Langkat Suku Bunga Kredit. PDRB harga berlaku

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

23571 Introductory Econometrics Assignment B (Spring 2017)

DATA PENELITIAN. Pendapatan Nasional (PDB Perkapita atas Dasar Harga Berlaku) Produksi Bawang Merah Indonesia MB X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6

Lampiran 1 Lampiran 1 Data Keuangan Bank konvensional

FIN 533. Autocorrelations of CPI Inflation

LAMPIRAN. Null Hypothesis: LO has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 1 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=13)

Assist. Prof. Dr. Nuray İslatince 1

Inflation,Inflation Variability, and Output Performance. Venezuela

LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN. A. Perhitungan Return On Asset

Lampiran 1. Data PDB, Pengeluaran Pemerintah, jumlah uang beredar, pajak, dan tingkat suku bunga

esia/perkembangan/

Quantitative evidence of post-crisis structural macroeconomic changes

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Wilayah Tahun PAD JOW PDRB JH JR Yogyakarta

COTTON: PHYSICAL PRICES BECOMING MORE RESPONSIVE TO FUTURES PRICES0F

POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ECONOMETRICS. Mr.

FBBABLLR1CBQ_US Commercial Banks: Assets - Bank Credit - Loans and Leases - Residential Real Estate (Bil, $, SA)

Okun s Law - an empirical test using Brazilian data

Lampiran 1. Tabulasi Data

ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE EXPENSES OF SOCIAL PROTECTION AND THE ANTICIPATED OLD AGE PENSION

LAMPIRAN. A. Data. PAD (juta) INVESTASI (%) PDRB (juta) Kulon Progo. Bantul. Gunung Kidul. Sleman

Economy May Wake Up Without Consumers Prodding? Chart 1

1.4 Show the steps necessary to obtain relative PPP in growth rates.

Determinants of Private Investment in Thailand

Memo on the Determinants of Central Bank Euro Holdings by Menzie Chinn 1 UC Santa Cruz

1. A test of the theory is the regression, since no arbitrage implies, Under the null: a = 0, b =1, and the error e or u is unpredictable.

SUSTAINABILITY PLANNING POLICY COLLECTING THE REVENUES OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATION

LAMPIRAN. Tahun Bulan NPF (Milyar Rupiah)

TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS OF AN EFFICIENT MARKET IN TERMS OF INFORMATION THE CASE OF THE CAPITAL MARKET IN ROMANIA DURING RECESSION

Business Survey and Short-Term Projection

Back from the Dead: the GFC and the Resurrection of Long Term Unemployment

Anexos. Pruebas de estacionariedad. Null Hypothesis: TES has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=9)

Influence of Macroeconomic Indicators on Mutual Funds Market in India

Interest Rates in India: Information Content of Inflation

Appendices. Appendix 1 Buy ranges for each portfolio

Factor Affecting Yields for Treasury Bills In Pakistan?

An Investigation of Effective Factors on Export in Iran

DATA VARIABEL PENELITIAN

ملحق رقم (1) بیانات الدراسة :

FTSE BIRR. ftserussell.com. FTSE Russell 1

Balance of payments and policies that affects its positioning in Nigeria

An Examination of Seasonality in Indian Stock Markets With Reference to NSE

Exchange Rate and Economic Performance - A Comparative Study of Developed and Developing Countries

Financial Risk, Liquidity Risk and their Effect on the Listed Jordanian Islamic Bank's Performance

THE IMPACT OF BANKING RISKS ON THE CAPITAL OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN LIBYA

LAMPIRAN. Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob.

Analysis of the Influence of the Annualized Rate of Rentability on the Unit Value of the Net Assets of the Private Administered Pension Fund NN

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2014, 6(6): Research Article

Received: 4 September Revised: 9 September Accepted: 19 September. Foreign Institutional Investment on Indian Capital Market: An Empirical Analysis

Übungsblatt 4. Please examine below OLS estimation results for the log earnings of Egyptian wage workers and answer the below questions:

Muhammad Nasir SHARIF 1 Kashif HAMID 2 Muhammad Usman KHURRAM 3 Muhammad ZULFIQAR 4 1

Forecasting the Philippine Stock Exchange Index using Time Series Analysis Box-Jenkins

LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN. = Pengeluaran Konsumsi Masyarakat (milyar rupiah) = Jumlah Uang Beredar (milyar rupiah) = Laju Inflasi (dalam persentase)

9. Assessing the impact of the credit guarantee fund for SMEs in the field of agriculture - The case of Hungary

THE IMPACT OF INSURANCE ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NIGERIA

An empirical study on the dynamic relationship between crude oil prices and Nigeria stock market

Gloria Gonzalez-Rivera Forecasting For Economics and Business Solutions Manual

Foreign and Public Investment and Economic Growth: The Case of Romania

IMPACT OF MACROECONOMIC VARIABLE ON STOCK MARKET RETURN AND ITS VOLATILITY

The Impacts of Financial Crisis on Pakistan Economy: An Empirical Approach

A Test of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem Using Market Evaluations of Kazakhstani Banks

Return on Assets and Financial Soundness Analysis: Case Study of Grain Industry Companies in Uzbekistan

RESEARCH ON INFLUENCING FACTORS OF RURAL CONSUMPTION IN CHINA-TAKE SHANDONG PROVINCE AS AN EXAMPLE.

The effect of Devaluation on Economic growth in Fiji

LAMPIRAN. Universitas Sumatera Utara

THE CAUSALITY BETWEEN REVENUES AND EXPENDITURE OF THE FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS OF PAKISTAN

THE IMPACT OF OIL REVENUES ON BUDGET DEFICIT IN SELECTED OIL COUNTRIES

Estimating Egypt s Potential Output: A Production Function Approach

The Impact of Credit Risk Management in the Profitability of Albanian Commercial Banks During the Period

Empirical Analysis of Private Investments: The Case of Pakistan

CHAPTER 5 MARKET LEVEL INDUSTRY LEVEL AND FIRM LEVEL VOLATILITY

Per Capita Housing Starts: Forecasting and the Effects of Interest Rate

Transcription:

Economics 442 Macroeconomic Policy (Spring 2015) 3/23/2015 Instructor: Prof. Menzie Chinn UW Madison

Outline Models of Investment Assessment Uncertainty

http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/neer/neer2001/neer201a.pdf

Out-of-sample Forecasts http://cba2.unomaha.edu/faculty/mwohar/web/links/workpap/invest_race.pdf

Gruber-Kamin: US

Net Lending vs. Cash

Levels 2,400 2,000 Fixed nonresidential investment, Ch.09$, SAAr 1,600 Gross 1,200 800 Net 400 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 INV_NONRES09 INV_NONRESNET09

Logs, Relative to GDP 0.8 Log investment to GDP, relative to 1967Q1 0.4 Gross 0.0-0.4 Net 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 LOG(INV_NONRES09/GDP09)-LOG(@ELEM(INV_NONRES09,67.1)/@ELEM(GDP09,67.1)) LOG(INV_NONRESNET09/GDP09)-LOG(@ELEM(INV_NONRESNET09,67.1)/@ELEM(GDP09,67.1))

Logs, Relative to Capital 0.8 Log investment to net capital stock, relative to 1968Q1 Gross 0.4 0.0 Net -0.4 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Log(I/K) and r -2.5-3.0-3.5-4.0-4.5-5.0-5.5-6.0-6.5 log(i/k) [left scale] Real 1 year interest rate [right scale] 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 LOG(INV_NONRESNET09/NONRES_CAPSTOCKNET09) REAL1YEAR_UMICH/100.10.08.06.04.02.00 -.02 -.04 -.06

Regression on GDP growth, r Dependent Variable: LOG(INV_NONRESNET09/NONRES_CAPSTOCKNET 09) Method: Least Squares Date: 03/25/15 Time: 15:39 Sample (adjusted): 1978Q1 2014Q4 Included observations: 148 after adjustments HAC standard errors & covariance (Bartlett kernel, Newey-West fixed bandwidth = 5.0000) Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob. C -4.207268 0.127812-32.91754 0.0000 D(LOG(GDP09),0,4) 7.009185 2.779121 2.522087 0.0127 REAL1YEAR_UMICH/1... 0.760280 1.828193 0.415864 0.6781 R-squared 0.150812 Mean dependent var -4.004735 Adjusted R-squared 0.139099 S.D. dependent var 0.398638 S.E. of regression 0.369875 Akaike info criterion 0.868761 Sum squared resid 19.83713 Schwarz criterion 0.929515 Log likelihood -61.28830 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.893445 F-statistic 12.87571 Durbin-Watson stat 0.125411 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000007 Wald F-statistic 3.251665 Prob(Wald F-statistic) 0.041550

Log(I/K) and Stock Market -2.5-3.0 Log real S&P [right scale] 8.0 7.6-3.5-4.0-4.5-5.0-5.5-6.0 Log(I/K) [left scale] 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 LOG(INV_NONRESNET09/NONRES_CAPSTOCKNET09) LOG(REALS_AND_P) 7.2 6.8 6.4 6.0 5.6 5.2

Regression on GDP, Stock Market Dependent Variable: LOG(INV_NONRESNET09/NONRES_CAPSTOCKNET 09) Method: Least Squares Date: 03/25/15 Time: 15:42 Sample (adjusted): 1968Q1 2014Q4 Included observations: 188 after adjustments HAC standard errors & covariance (Bartlett kernel, Newey-West fixed bandwidth = 5.0000) Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob. C -5.469733 0.524210-10.43424 0.0000 D(LOG(GDP09),0,4) 5.592260 2.532982 2.207777 0.0285 LOG(REALS_AND_P) 0.193252 0.081649 2.366850 0.0190 R-squared 0.203574 Mean dependent var -4.033500 Adjusted R-squared 0.194964 S.D. dependent var 0.366513 S.E. of regression 0.328850 Akaike info criterion 0.629397 Sum squared resid 20.00630 Schwarz criterion 0.681043 Log likelihood -56.16334 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.650322 F-statistic 23.64386 Durbin-Watson stat 0.134206 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000 Wald F-statistic 6.178305 Prob(Wald F-statistic) 0.002527

Log(I/K) and Policy Uncertainty -2.5-3.0-3.5-4.0-4.5-5.0-5.5 Log(I/K) [left scale] Log policy uncertainty [right scale] 5.4 5.2 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2-6.0 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 LOG(INV_NONRESNET09/NONRES_CAPSTOCKNET09) LOG(POLICYUNCERTAINTY) 4.0

Regression on GDP, Policy Uncertainty Dependent Variable: LOG(INV_NONRESNET09/NONRES_CAPSTOCKNET 09) Method: Least Squares Date: 03/25/15 Time: 15:48 Sample (adjusted): 1985Q1 2014Q4 Included observations: 120 after adjustments HAC standard errors & covariance (Bartlett kernel, Newey-West fixed bandwidth = 5.0000) Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob. C -1.887578 0.961460-1.963241 0.0520 D(LOG(GDP09),0,4) 8.541476 3.945985 2.164599 0.0324 LOG(POLICYUNCERTAINT... -0.506003 0.207088-2.443422 0.0160 R-squared 0.306644 Mean dependent var -4.010318 Adjusted R-squared 0.294792 S.D. dependent var 0.434687 S.E. of regression 0.365036 Akaike info criterion 0.847040 Sum squared resid 15.59039 Schwarz criterion 0.916727 Log likelihood -47.82239 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.875340 F-statistic 25.87225 Durbin-Watson stat 0.200999 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000 Wald F-statistic 6.266819 Prob(Wald F-statistic) 0.002597

Regression on Determinants Dependent Variable: LOG(INV_NONRESNET09/NONRES_CAPSTOCKNET 09) Method: Least Squares Date: 03/25/15 Time: 15:49 Sample (adjusted): 1985Q1 2014Q4 Included observations: 120 after adjustments HAC standard errors & covariance (Bartlett kernel, Newey-West fixed bandwidth = 5.0000) Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob. C -5.757367 1.450487-3.969265 0.0001 D(LOG(GDP09),0,4) 10.92071 3.377149 3.233707 0.0016 LOG(POLICYUNCERTAINT... -0.271835 0.214765-1.265734 0.2081 LOG(REALS_AND_P) 0.391195 0.106834 3.661712 0.0004 R-squared 0.455384 Mean dependent var -4.010318 Adjusted R-squared 0.441299 S.D. dependent var 0.434687 S.E. of regression 0.324912 Akaike info criterion 0.622243 Sum squared resid 12.24590 Schwarz criterion 0.715160 Log likelihood -33.33460 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.659977 F-statistic 32.33141 Durbin-Watson stat 0.238104 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000 Wald F-statistic 15.87951 Prob(Wald F-statistic) 0.000000

Adding in a Time Trend Dependent Variable: LOG(INV_NONRESNET09/NONRES_CAPSTOCKNET 09) Method: Least Squares Date: 03/25/15 Time: 15:50 Sample (adjusted): 1985Q1 2014Q4 Included observations: 120 after adjustments HAC standard errors & covariance (Bartlett kernel, Newey-West fixed bandwidth = 5.0000) Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob. C -9.233901 1.338200-6.900242 0.0000 D(LOG(GDP09),0,4) 7.853457 3.218049 2.440440 0.0162 LOG(POLICYUNCERTAINT... -0.029101 0.170229-0.170950 0.8646 LOG(REALS_AND_P) 0.878540 0.197300 4.452815 0.0000 @TREND -0.007280 0.003297-2.208250 0.0292 R-squared 0.512061 Mean dependent var -4.010318 Adjusted R-squared 0.495089 S.D. dependent var 0.434687 S.E. of regression 0.308876 Akaike info criterion 0.529021 Sum squared resid 10.97151 Schwarz criterion 0.645166 Log likelihood -26.74125 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.576188 F-statistic 30.17125 Durbin-Watson stat 0.224484 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000 Wald F-statistic 13.09179 Prob(Wald F-statistic) 0.000000

Fitted Values (no trend) 600 500 Investment 400 300 200 Fitted 100 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 INV_NONRESNET09 INV_HAT