Pierce County, Wisconsin. Bridge at Trenton Island. Photo by Rebecca Kihslinger.

Similar documents
ANNEX B: TOWN OF BLUE RIVER

In 1993, spring came in like a lion, but refused

Public Meeting 28 November Presented by: Deepa Srinivasan, Vision Planning and Consulting, LLC Dr. Michael Scott, ESRGC, Salisbury University

COASTAL HAZARD MITIGATION TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Mercer County Kick-off Meeting December 6, 2006

PEPIN COUNTY EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION (ESF) 14 LONG-TERM RECOVERY

Flood Risk Review and Resilience Meeting: Allegheny County

ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (ABFEs)

Article 23-6 FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

a) Ensure public safety through reducing the threats to life and personal injury.

Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain management plans and flood forecast inundation maps

Initial Estimate of the Impacts of Hurricane Katrina. December 2005

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Warren County Planning Workshop (2 nd Meeting) March 7, 2007

IN THIS ISSUE SPRING FLOODS. Black River, Pocahontas, Arkansas

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

Town of Montrose Annex

Camden Industrial. Minneapolis neighborhood profile. About this area. Trends in the area. Neighborhood in Minneapolis.

BUYOUTS/RELOCATION/FLOODPROOFING: REGULATORY PROGRAMS AND EXPERIENCE IN OTHER COMMUNITIES

Vulnerability of Lents Floodplain Area Residents Study Area Map

Population in the U.S. Floodplains

DuPage County East Branch DuPage River Resiliency Project. Benefit Cost Analysis

Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Kankakee County, Illinois Executive Summary

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

G318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Module 2: Risk Assessment. Visual 2.0

Q1 Do you...(check all that apply).

CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROJECT (CAP) Federal Interest Determination

Army Corps of Engineers Indianapolis North Questions and Answers July QUESTION 1: What is the Indianapolis White River North project?

Coastal Barrier Resources Act of 1982 (as amended) Guidelines for Compliance

COMBINED PUBLIC NOTICE

Pre-Development Floodplain Application

Appendix G. Overview of Benefit Cost Analysis for Hamilton-Skagit Flood Mitigation & Town Relocation Program

Floodplain Management 101. Mississippi Emergency Management Agency Floodplain Management Bureau

Third Appropriation Funding Recommendation

University Drive Flood Risk Management Project Phase I 58 th Ave S to 500 S of 64 th Ave S City of Fargo Project FM-15-C1

Volusia County Floodplain Management Plan 2012

University of Minnesota

Mitigation 101. KAMM Regional Training. February March Esther White, Speaker

Plan Maintenance Procedures

PROPERTY OFFERING. 32 Audette Rd, Franklin CT 06254

CHAPTER 15: FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT "FP"

Lake County. Government Finance Study. Supplemental Material by Geography. Prepared by the Indiana Business Research Center

Mitigation Success Publications

Changes in Criteria and Scoring for CRS Outreach Projects

April 3, 4, & 5, 2017 Pittsburgh, Butler, Erie Western PA

LMS TIMES. Director s Corner. This Issue:

Mid - City Industrial

Flood Mitigation Workgroup. Kickoff Meeting Metro Hall, Room 106 May 11, 2015

Local Damage Assessment. Pocket Guide

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION

Delaware River Basin Commission s Role in Flood Loss Reduction Efforts

GALVESTON COUNTY ECONOMIC RESILIENCE PROFILE

Skagit Floodway Mitigation and Hamilton Relocation Program FACT SHEET

EMERGENCY CONTACTS. Flood Warning System. Pierce County Contact Information PIERCE COUNTY ALERT! EMERGENCY FLOOD INFORMATION

Priority Ranking. Timeframe. Faribault County Blue Earth, Bricelyn, Delavan, Easton, Elmore, Frost, Kiester, Minnesota Lake, Walters, Wells, Winnebago

Flooding Part One: BE Informed. Department of Planning & Development

Flood Insurance vs. Disaster Assistance. Janice Mitchell FEMA, Region

Shingle Creek. Minneapolis neighborhood profile. About this area. Trends in the area. Neighborhood in Minneapolis. October 2011

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN GUIDEBOOK

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT: A PRESENT AND A 21st CENTURY IMPERATIVE. Gerald E. Galloway, Jr. United States Military Academy

Passaic River Basin Flood Advisory Commission Report/Status of Recommendations. October 2014 Update

TOWN OF KENT, CT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

Historic Structures in the Floodplain

Lake County. Government Finance Study. Supplemental Material by Geography. Prepared by the Indiana Business Research Center

ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND FLOOD MITIGATION

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Orientation. Overview. Contents

Flood Risk in the Schuylkill Watershed. Planning for Resilient Communities

BUTTS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Priority Ranking. Timeframe. Faribault County Blue Earth, Bricelyn, Delavan, Easton, Elmore, Frost, Kiester, Minnesota Lake, Walters, Wells, Winnebago

Interagency Nonstructural Flood Risk Management Workshop. Carey Johnson Kentucky Division of Water

The National Flood Insurance Program and Flood Insurance Rate Map for San Francisco. Presentation at Treasure Island Community Meeting

Priority Ranking. Timeframe. Faribault County Blue Earth, Bricelyn, Delavan, Easton, Elmore, Frost, Kiester, Minnesota Lake, Walters, Wells, Winnebago

City of Sea Isle City Department of Construction and Zoning Physical Location: 4501 Park Road (rear entrance)

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

HUD s Environmental Review Process. Disaster Assistance Training 2012 Jerimiah Sanders, Environmental Specialist

Simsbury. Challenges Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 356

Flood Vulnerability Assessment for Critical Facilities. Molly Woloszyn Lisa Graff, GISP, CFM

ENBRIDGE ENERGY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SPECIAL USE PERMIT

INTEGRATION OF THE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY INTO THE LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHARLOTTE COUNTY PROFILE. Executive Summary

Integrating Hazard Mitigation into Local Planning to Support Community Resilience on the Mississippi Gulf Coast

Key Fundamentals of Flood Insurance in the NFIP!

Public Assistance Program

A Sublette County Profile: Socioeconomics

King County Flood Control District 2015 Work Program

Hazard Mitigation Grants. Technical Assistance Session Middlesex County, NJ December 7, 2011

INVESTMENT OFFERING. Fairview Park 6728 W. Fairveiw Ave. Boise, ID N ALLUMBAUGH ST W FAIRVIEW AVE N FRY ST N RAYMOND ST

Disaster Insurance: Are States and Insurance Companies Prepared?

CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT

Multi-Jurisdictional. Multnomah County. Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. Public Comment DRAFT Nov. 7, 2016

Updated Total Exposure in Floodplain (TEIF) Method. Cynthia McCoy, FEMA Region X James Mawby, RAMPP (Dewberry)

Facts & Info regarding the NFIP in Mathews County VA And the Mathews County Floodplain Management Ordinance

9.36 TOWN OF VAN BUREN

ECONOMIC OVERVIEW DuPage County, Illinois

Frequently Asked Questions Oxbow / Hickson / Bakke Ring Levee Option

Guideline For Compliance With The Standards and Criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program

FEMA s Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grant Programs. Jeff Ward, JSWA

MSD Quick Buy Program. Lori Rafferty, PE, CFM

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

Transcription:

Pierce County, Wisconsin Bridge at Trenton Island. Photo by Rebecca Kihslinger.

Background Pierce County (pop. 41,019) is located in northwestern Wisconsin and shares a border with Minnesota along the Mississippi River. Within Pierce County is Trenton Township, a community that includes the flood-prone Trenton Island. The island, located in the middle of the Mississippi River, was developed with homes and businesses before Pierce County adopted any restrictions on development in the floodplain. Trenton Island's floodplain properties included numerous homes and businesses that have been damaged by frequent flooding. Figure 2: Relevant Features in Pierce Figure 1: Pierce Location History of Flooding and Mitigation Trenton Island and the surrounding communities of Bay City, Hagar City and Spring Valley, experienced major flood events in 1952, 1965, 1969, 1993, and 1997 ("Mitigation Success," p. 1). These floods damaged the island's properties and overwhelmed its infrastructure, causing sewage leaks and the contamination of drinking water. Residents who found their homes unlivable were compelled to stay in costly temporary housing. After the floods of 1993, the FEMA made Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) funds available for mitigation projects, including the County's buyout program.

Table 1: Pierce Demographics Pierce Wisconsin Population (2010) 41,019 5,771,337 Median age 37 38.5 Housing units 16,132 2,648,317 Owner occupied 72.9 67.7 Black (%) 0.6 6.6 White (%) 96.6 87.8 Hispanic or Latino (%) 1.6 6.5 High school degree (%) 93.9 90.8 Bachelor s degree (%) 26.3 27.4 Median household income $61,613 $52,738 Poverty rate 10.8 13.2 Source: US Census, 2010 and American Community Survey 2014 According to Census data, Pierce County is relatively affluent compared to the state of Wisconsin as a whole. The county's median household income is slightly higher than the state average, and the poverty rate is lower. White residents make up a substantial majority of Pierce County, at almost 97%. The Buyout In response to the flooding, Pierce County led an initial buyout program in 1993 and purchased 59 properties. Three additional homes were acquired by the town of Bay City. The total cost of the project was $6,147,186, which accounted for the pre-disaster value of the homes as well as a primary-residence premium, according to Andy Pichotta, Director and LUC of the Pierce County Department of Land Management. What is meant by a primary residence premium? Figure 3: Homes on Trenton Island, 1992 Figure 3 shows an aerial photograph of Trenton Island in 1992, a year before the devastating flooding in 1993. The Mississippi River splits and flows on both sides of the island. Homes located along the left leg of the split can be seen in the photograph. Following the 1993 floods, most of

these homes were acquired and demolished or relocated. Source: Google earth, 1992 Figure 4: Map of Buyout Areas Figure 4 highlights in red the parcels that were acquired on Trenton Island. They form a mostly-contiguous stretch of land along the Mississippi River. If all parcels were bought in this stretch of land, the county would own around 0.7 miles of contiguous, natural open space. Seventy-five percent of the buyout was financed by FEMA, with the remaining 25% divided between Wisconsin Emergency Management and the Wisconsin Department of Administration, Division of Housing. The sale of salvage from the acquired properties supplemented these funds with an additional $187,989. Of that, $52,239 was used to fund another HMGP buyout project in Darlington, Wisconsin ( Mitigation Success," p. 3). Table 2: Homes Acquired in the Buyout Total homes in Pierce County 16,132 Homes acquired in buyout 62 Homes remaining in flood 20 hazard area Total cost of buyout $6,147,186 Cost per home $104,189.59 An acquisition offer was extended to every resident on Trenton Island, and all but 20 property owners accepted the buyout. Those who agreed to participate were compensated with the fair market value of their properties as well as moving expenses and the state-required replacement housing cost differential. Under state law, the cost differential made up the difference, if any, between the acquisition cost and the reasonable cost to purchase a replacement, or the actual cost of the replacement dwelling, whichever is less ("Mitigation

Success," p. 4). With this financial assistance, 80% of relocated homeowners were able to move to a new home within Pierce County and no farther than 5 miles away from Trenton Island ("Mitigation Success," p. 5). Pierce County's buyout program incorporated a unique flood-related ordinance, the second of its kind in the state of Wisconsin. According to the ordinance, for a given structure located in the floodplain, renovation and repairs can only take place if flood-related structural damage does not exceed 50% of the property's value. According to Pichotta, some property owners who chose to remain on Trenton Island were able to carry out repairs and flood-proofing under this ordinance. However, most of the twenty remaining properties flooded again in the severe flood events of 1997 and 2001 ("Mitigation Success," p. 5). Yet, it is clear that, as a result of the buyout, flood damage was greatly reduced. Compared to the flood of 1993, later flood events were less damaging. Pichotta noted that Pierce County held on to 57 of the buyout-acquired properties until 2010, when Trenton Township took ownership of them. The remaining two properties are still held by the county, which restored them for use as boat landings. Current Status According to Pichotta, Pierce County manages the acquired land as forested floodplain on which development is forbidden. It is not managed for recreation or wildlife protection purposes. The boat ramp is mainly used for walleye fishing in the winter, an activity that attracts visitors to Trenton Island. Finally, although camping is currently forbidden by a town ordinance, the county has discussed the development of campgrounds. No plans are currently in place to establish camping in the buyout areas. Integration with Hazard Mitigation Plan Buyouts are an integral part of mitigation planning for Pierce County. Contributors to the "Mitigation Success" document, which include FEMA Hazard Mitigation staff, Wisconsin Emergency Management, the Pierce County Department of Land Management and Resources, the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the National Weather Service, and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, list four goals of hazard mitigation: To acquire flood-prone properties from willing sellers To provide property owners with an opportunity to recoup investments and equity To ensure that the land use of acquired properties remain compatible with open space, recreational, or wetlands management practices To reduce the need for future county, state, and federal disaster response and recovery expenditures

Consistent with these goals, Pierce County has applied for hazard mitigation grants from the state (2011 State of Wisconsin Hazard Mitigation Plan, p. C-12). Wisconsin's State Hazard Mitigation Plan, last updated in 2011, emphasizes the importance of local mitigation planning, especially for flooding, which is listed in the plan as a major potential hazard with both high probability of occurring and high mitigation potential. Additionally, Pierce County's Emergency Management Director, Gary Brown, applied in 2011 for a Pre-Disaster Mitigation planning grant to achieve hazard mitigation targets (Pierce County Herald, 2011). The objectives of hazard mitigation are supported by Wisconsin's Hazard Mitigation Plan, which plans for coordination between local, state, and federal organizations to acquire flood-prone properties and protect property owners in floodplains. For example the National Flood Insurance Program makes funds available for communities who enforce floodplain management ordinances (like Pierce County's) with federally-backed flood insurance. The Department of Natural Resources assists with the administration of local ordinances and mitigation programs in the event of flooding (2011 State of Wisconsin Hazard Mitigation Plan, p. 7-14-7-17). Conclusion Overall, the results of the buyout in Pierce County have been mixed. The acquisition of 59 homes on Trenton Island reduced the county s vulnerability to future floods, but the piecemeal nature of the buyout limits the county s options for using the acquired lands. An estimated 65 to 68% of properties on Trenton Island were acquired and converted to open space ("Mitigation Success," p. 5). The financial support provided to property owners by Pierce County facilitated acceptance of the buyout on a large scale. Furthermore, the majority of homeowners were able to relocate within a distance of 5 miles from their original property, remaining settled within the county. Pierce County's sale of salvage from acquired properties, which recouped some of the costs of the buyout, is significant for its use in funding another buyout project in the state of Wisconsin, in the town of Darlington. Pierce County deserves recognition for its financial management of buyout programs. References Wisconsin Emergency Management. "Mitigation Success -- Trenton Island, Pierce County, Wisconsin." Undated. Pierce County Herald. "Pierce County starts hazard mitigation plan update." 19 Jul 2011.

Wisconsin Emergency Management. 2011. 2011 State of Wisconsin Hazard Mitigation Plan. Accessed at http://emergencymanagement.wi.gov/mitigation/state_plan.asp