esia/perkembangan/

Similar documents
Lampiran 1. Data PDB, Pengeluaran Pemerintah, jumlah uang beredar, pajak, dan tingkat suku bunga

LAMPIRAN. Null Hypothesis: LO has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 1 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=13)

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I

LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN. = Pengeluaran Konsumsi Masyarakat (milyar rupiah) = Jumlah Uang Beredar (milyar rupiah) = Laju Inflasi (dalam persentase)

Lampiran 1 : Grafik Data HIV Asli

Kabupaten Langkat Suku Bunga Kredit. PDRB harga berlaku

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Hasil Common Effect Model

LAMPIRAN PERHITUNGAN EVIEWS

LAMPIRAN. Tahun Bulan NPF (Milyar Rupiah)

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 1. 2) descriptive statistics and correlogram. Series: LGCSI Sample 12/31/ /11/2009 Observations 2596

Lampiran 1. Tabulasi Data

Anexos. Pruebas de estacionariedad. Null Hypothesis: TES has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=9)

An Investigation of Effective Factors on Export in Iran

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 2. 2) graphs. 3) unit root tests

DATA VARIABEL PENELITIAN

LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN. A. Perhitungan Return On Asset

Economics 442 Macroeconomic Policy (Spring 2015) 3/23/2015. Instructor: Prof. Menzie Chinn UW Madison

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Wilayah Tahun PAD JOW PDRB JH JR Yogyakarta

Appendixes Appendix 1 Data of Dependent Variables and Independent Variables Period

Lampiran I Data. PDRB (Juta Rupiah) PMA (Juta Rupiah) PMDN (Juta Rupiah) Tahun. Luas Sawit (ha)

LAMPIRAN 1. Retribusi (ribu Rp)

DATA PENELITIAN. Pendapatan Nasional (PDB Perkapita atas Dasar Harga Berlaku) Produksi Bawang Merah Indonesia MB X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6

Donald Trump's Random Walk Up Wall Street

Lampiran 1 Lampiran 1 Data Keuangan Bank konvensional

Appendix. Table A.1 (Part A) The Author(s) 2015 G. Chakrabarti and C. Sen, Green Investing, SpringerBriefs in Finance, DOI /

Export and Import Regressions on 2009Q1 preliminary release data Menzie Chinn, 23 June 2009 ( )

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

BYLAAG: E-VIEWS RESULTATE VAN DIE MODEL VAN VOORRAADINVESTERING IN SUID-AFRIKA

Interactions between United States (VIX) and United Kingdom (VFTSE) Market Volatility: A Time Series Study

LAMPIRAN. A. Data. PAD (juta) INVESTASI (%) PDRB (juta) Kulon Progo. Bantul. Gunung Kidul. Sleman

POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ECONOMETRICS. Mr.

FIN 533. Autocorrelations of CPI Inflation

UJI COMMON EFFECT MODEL

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANNEL OF MONETARY POLICY TRANSMISSION MECHANISM IN SRI LANKA

Assist. Prof. Dr. Nuray İslatince 1

Notes on the Treasury Yield Curve Forecasts. October Kara Naccarelli

SUSTAINABILITY PLANNING POLICY COLLECTING THE REVENUES OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATION

Trade Misinvoicing and Macroeconomic Outcomes in India

Relationship between Oil Price, Exchange Rates and Stock Market: An Empirical study of Indian stock market

The Relationship Between Internet Marketing, Search Volume, and Product Sales. Honors Research Thesis

How can saving deposit rate and Hang Seng Index affect housing prices : an empirical study in Hong Kong market

An empirical study on the dynamic relationship between crude oil prices and Nigeria stock market

THE TWIN DEFICIT HYPOTHESIS: THE CASE OF BULGARIA

Fall 2004 Social Sciences 7418 University of Wisconsin-Madison Problem Set 5 Answers

IMPACT OF MACROECONOMIC VARIABLE ON STOCK MARKET RETURN AND ITS VOLATILITY

Econometric Models for the Analysis of Financial Portfolios

LAMPIRAN. Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob.

Santi Chaisrisawatsuk 16 November 2017 Thimpu, Bhutan

Monetary Economics Portfolios Risk and Returns Diversification and Risk Factors Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015

ملحق رقم (1) بیانات الدراسة :

Openness and Inflation

BEcon Program, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University Page 1/7

The Strengthening Relationship between Economy and Government Spending: The Case of Indonesia

Financial Econometrics: Problem Set # 3 Solutions

ijcrb.webs.com INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AUGUST 2012 VOL 4, NO 4

1. A test of the theory is the regression, since no arbitrage implies, Under the null: a = 0, b =1, and the error e or u is unpredictable.

The Impacts of Financial Crisis on Pakistan Economy: An Empirical Approach

Factor Affecting Yields for Treasury Bills In Pakistan?

ملحق رقم( 1 ): الا نحدار للدالة اللوغریثمیة للناتج المحلي الا جمالي

Forecasting the Philippine Stock Exchange Index using Time Series Analysis Box-Jenkins

Financial Risk, Liquidity Risk and their Effect on the Listed Jordanian Islamic Bank's Performance

The Effects of Oil Price Volatility on Some Macroeconomic Variables in Nigeria: Application of Garch and Var Models

Empirical Analysis of Private Investments: The Case of Pakistan

Model : ASI = C + MONSUP + MONSUP(-1) + INTRATE + INFLRATE. Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob.

Per Capita Housing Starts: Forecasting and the Effects of Interest Rate

ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE EXPENSES OF SOCIAL PROTECTION AND THE ANTICIPATED OLD AGE PENSION

Business Survey and Short-Term Projection

The Impact of Monetary Policies on Nigeria s Unemployment: Lessons for Poverty Reduction in Nigeria

LAMPIRAN. Universitas Sumatera Utara

Monetary Policy and Economic Stability in Nigeria: An Empirical Analysis

Supplementary Materials for

AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC DEBT RELEVANCE TO THE ECONOMIC GROWTH OF THE USA

TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS OF AN EFFICIENT MARKET IN TERMS OF INFORMATION THE CASE OF THE CAPITAL MARKET IN ROMANIA DURING RECESSION

Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven growth: A panel econometrics approach

The Frequency of Wars*

An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Inflation in Nigeria

CHAPTER 5 MARKET LEVEL INDUSTRY LEVEL AND FIRM LEVEL VOLATILITY

Determinants of Merchandise Export Performance in Sri Lanka

The Influence of Leverage and Profitability on Earnings Quality: Jordanian Case

الملحق رقم (1): یوضح متغیرات النموذج.

An Empirical Research on the Relationship Between Non-Interest Income Business and Operation Performance of Commercial Banks

An Analysis of Stock Returns and Exchange Rates: Evidence from IT Industry in India

COTTON: PHYSICAL PRICES BECOMING MORE RESPONSIVE TO FUTURES PRICES0F

1.4 Show the steps necessary to obtain relative PPP in growth rates.

Exchange Rate and Economic Performance - A Comparative Study of Developed and Developing Countries

Employment growth and Unemployment rate reduction: Historical experiences and future labour market outcomes

Methods for A Time Series Approach to Estimating Excess Mortality Rates in Puerto Rico, Post Maria 1 Menzie Chinn 2 August 10, 2018 Procedure:

Relative Effectiveness of Fiscal and Monetary Policies in Nigeria

On the Importance of Labour Productivity Growth: Portugal vs. Ireland

Research Article The Volatility of the Index of Shanghai Stock Market Research Based on ARCH and Its Extended Forms

Return-Volatility Interactions in the Nigerian Stock Market

9. Appendixes. Page 73 of 95

Asian Economic and Financial Review SOURCES OF EXCHANGE RATE FLUCTUATION IN VIETNAM: AN APPLICATION OF THE SVAR MODEL

AFRREV IJAH, Vol.3 (1) January, 2014

Übungsblatt 4. Please examine below OLS estimation results for the log earnings of Egyptian wage workers and answer the below questions:

Conflict of Exchange Rates

Studying the Relationship between P/E Ratio and Stock Return in the Manufacturing Firms Accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange Market

Okun s Law - an empirical test using Brazilian data

An Analysis of Macroeconomic Factors Affecting Foreign Exchange Rate

Transcription:

http://afghanaus.com/uanggiral/http://www.bi.go.id/web/id/sistem+pembayaran/sistem+pembayaran+di+indon esia/perkembangan/ http://id.shvoong.com/social-sciences/economics/2129762-jumlah-uang-beredar-diindonesia/ http://www.ollydondokambey.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id =174:asumsi-asumsi-makro-ekonomi-2012&catid=65:artikel&Itemid=202 http://www.bi.go.id/web/id/ http://www.bps.go.id/ LAMPIRAN 1 Gambaran Makro Ekonomi

LAMPIRAN 2 t-statistic Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -4.456831 0.0102 Test critical values: 1% level -4.467895 5% level -3.644963 10% level -3.261452 Variable Coefficnt Std. Error t-statistic Prob. D(Y(-1)) -1.671807 0.375111-4.456831 0.0003 D(Y(-1),2) 0.447621 0.247908 1.805590 0.0887 C -18.66320 9.983700-1.869367 0.0789 @TREND(1988) 3.644977 0.948199 3.844106 0.0013 R-squared 0.628309 Mean dependent var 2.809048

Adjusted R-squared 0.562717 S.D. dependent var 27.49987 S.E. of regression 18.18494 Akaike info criterion 8.808708 Sum squared resid 5621.765 Schwarz criterion 9.007665 Log likelihood -88.49143 F-statistic 9.578989 Durbin-Watson stat 1.957484 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000623

LAMPIRAN 3 Tabel 4.6. Unit Root Test dan Derajat Integrasi dengan ADF Test pada X1 t-statistic Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -3.858913 0.0357 Test critical values: 1% level -4.532598 5% level -3.673616 10% level -3.277364 Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob. D(X1(-1)) -0.967415 0.250696-3.858913 0.0014 C -246495.4 135316.2-1.821625 0.0873 @TREND(1988) 46600.21 13985.05 3.332145 0.0042 R-squared 0.488681 Mean dependent var 50770.47 Adjusted R-squared 0.424766 S.D. dependent var 336635.2 S.E. of regression 255318.1 Akaike info criterion 27.88235 Sum squared resid 1.04E+12 Schwarz criterion 28.03147 Log likelihood -261.8823 F-statistic 7.645817 Durbin-Watson stat 2.002507 Prob(F-statistic) 0.004672

LAMPIRAN 4 Table 4.7 Unit Root Test dan Derajat Integrasi dengan ADF Test pada X2 t-statistic Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -4.930755 0.0008 Test critical values: 1% level -3.788030 5% level -3.012363 10% level -2.646119 Variable Coefficnt Std. Error t-statistic Prob. D(X2(-1)) -1.434375 0.290904-4.930755 0.0001 D(X2(-1),2) 0.331420 0.191004 1.735147 0.0998 C -0.239051 0.796058-0.300294 0.7674 R-squared 0.648332 Mean dependent var 0.416667 Adjusted R-squared 0.609257 S.D. dependent var 5.763763 S.E. of regression 3.602895 Akaike info criterion 5.532916 Sum squared resid 233.6553 Schwarz criterion 5.682133 Log likelihood -55.09562 F-statistic 16.59229 Durbin-Watson stat 1.309007 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000082

LAMPIRAN 5 Table 4.8 Unit Root Test dan Derajat Integrasi dengan ADF Test pada X3 t-statistic Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -4.954647 0.0007 Test critical values: 1% level -3.769597 5% level -3.004861 10% level -2.642242 Variable Coefficnt Std. Error t-statistic Prob. D(X3(-1)) -1.101967 0.222411-4.954647 0.0001 C -0.553301 1.408635-0.392792 0.6986 R-squared 0.551051 Mean dependent var 0.022727 Adjusted R-squared 0.528604 S.D. dependent var 9.590306 S.E. of regression 6.584540 Akaike info criterion 6.693834 Sum squared resid 867.1233 Schwarz criterion 6.793020 Log likelihood -71.63217 F-statistic 24.54853 Durbin-Watson stat 2.071238 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000076

LAMPIRAN 6 Tabel 4.9 Uji Kointegrasi Augmented Dickey-Fuller Variable Coefficnt Std. Error t-statistic Prob. C 8.458948 12.65374 0.668494 0.5119 X1 5.30E-05 2.23E-06 23.77497 0.0000 X2 0.855586 1.195286 0.715800 0.4828 X3 0.552747 0.749979 0.737017 0.4701 R-squared 0.982912 Mean dependent var 117.2596 Adjusted R-squared 0.980214 S.D. dependent var 119.7968 S.E. of regression 16.85111 Akaike info criterion 8.643481 Sum squared resid 5395.238 Schwarz criterion 8.840958 Log likelihood - 95.40003 F-statistic 364.2920 Durbin-Watson stat 1.848697 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

LAMPIRAN 7 Table 4.10 Unit Root Test dan Derajat Integrasi dengan ADF Test setelah uji kointegrasi t-statistic Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -6.928478 0.0000 Test critical values: 1% level -3.831511 5% level -3.029970 10% level -2.655194 Variable Coefficnt Std. Error t-statistic Prob. D(RESID01(-1)) C - 1.404387 0.202698-6.928478 0.0000-0.602039 4.476444-0.134490 0.8946 R-squared 0.738477 Mean dependent var - 2.446852

Adjusted R-squared 0.723093 S.D. dependent var 37.01464 S.E. of regression 19.47782 Akaike info criterion 8.875730 Sum squared resid 6449.553 Schwarz criterion 8.975145 Log likelihood - 82.31944 F-statistic 48.00381 Durbin-Watson stat 1.118098 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000002 LAMPIRAN 8 Tabel 4.11 Hasil estimasi Vector Autoregression Cointegrating Eq: CointEq1 X1(-1) X2(-1) X3(-1) Y(-1) 1.000000-5.38E-05-4.079475 0.822571 (3.6E-06) (0.96127) (0.67202) [-15.1000] [-4.24386] [ 1.22402] C -2.477140 Error Correction: D(Y) D(X1) D(X2) D(X3) CointEq1-0.783914 420.8781 0.167342 0.072777 (0.28442) (3399.29) (0.06298) (0.10522) [-2.75619] [ 0.12381] [ 2.65696] [ 0.69169] D(Y(-1)) 0.501110 6600.035-0.077188 0.020467 (0.24336) (2908.62) (0.05389) (0.09003) [ 2.05909] [ 2.26913] [-1.43230] [ 0.22734] D(X1(-1)) 2.89E-05 0.673073 4.86E-07-5.24E-06 (1.3E-05) (0.15751) (2.9E-06) (4.9E-06) [ 2.19353] [ 4.27317] [ 0.16647] [-1.07460]

D(X2(-1)) -2.009141-9761.963 0.172169 0.680740 (1.09341) (13068.1) (0.24213) (0.40449) [-1.83750] [-0.74701] [ 0.71107] [ 1.68296] D(X3(-1)) 1.692336 29294.93-0.264995-0.404234 (0.71510) (8546.71) (0.15835) (0.26454) [ 2.36656] [ 3.42763] [-1.67344] [-1.52806] C 2.197170 49039.27 0.510219 0.718540 (5.19744) (62118.2) (1.15093) (1.92271) [ 0.42274] [ 0.78945] [ 0.44331] [ 0.37371] R-squared 0.601328 0.776195 0.343722 0.264902 Adj. R-squared 0.476743 0.706256 0.138635 0.035184 Sum sq. resids 4706.730 6.72E+11 230.8016 644.1196 S.E. equation 17.15140 204988.4 3.798039 6.344878 F-statistic 4.826648 11.09817 1.675980 1.153160 Log likelihood -90.23941-296.7892-57.07232-68.36191 Akaike AIC 8.749038 27.52629 5.733848 6.760174 Schwarz SC 9.046595 27.82385 6.031405 7.057731 Mean dependent 18.29832 337588.4-0.478636-0.500000 S.D. dependent 23.71058 378220.3 4.092283 6.459530 Determinant resid covariance (dof adj.) 3.74E+15 Determinant resid covariance 1.05E+15 Log likelihood -505.2850 Akaike information criterion 48.48046 Schwarz criterion 49.86906 LAMPIRAN 9 Tabel 4.12 Impulse Response Function Y Response of periode Y X1 X2 X3 1 17.15140 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 2 16.30414 12.23053 4.289410 5.887835 3 21.02779 19.97684 10.37603 9.566599 4 27.51858 23.87954 10.20515 13.89380 5 33.68891 27.88921 10.74013 18.89028 6 38.05935 32.90979 13.33083 22.52537 7 41.87226 37.32088 15.22903 25.61876

8 45.92196 40.80215 16.24172 28.80160 9 49.64461 44.06580 17.35627 31.75905 10 52.82236 47.24553 18.63266 34.32651 LAMPIRAN 10 Tabel 4.13 Impulse Response Function X1 Respon se of X1: Period Y X1 X2 X3

1-15500.49 204401.5 0.000000 0.000000 2 145412.1 303029.5-18611.31 166606.4 3 295236.1 414267.1 42736.19 269096.1 4 390575.7 536785.8 96176.25 349735.5 5 492139.0 634881.1 130083.6 432040.1 6 591652.1 720073.0 157849.7 509874.3 7 678136.4 802450.6 188839.8 579394.7 8 755033.7 878934.8 218672.6 641345.5 9 826530.0 947049.9 243522.8 698423.3 10 892538.3 1008708. 265684.8 751102.6 LAMPIRAN 11 Tabel 4.14 Impulse Response Function X2

Response of X2: Perio d Y X1 X2 X3 1 2.080969-0.684209 3.102664 0.000000 2 2.377086-1.895688 1.445711-0.715779 3 2.499888-2.375744 0.671271-0.219222 4 2.107807-2.147541 1.371606-0.502492 5 1.688640-2.157177 1.447907-0.841312 6 1.675338-2.477303 1.126374-0.881039 7 1.625052-2.657953 1.038959-0.929694 8 1.439750-2.708846 1.092279-1.060807 9 1.295575-2.802791 1.064731-1.174472 10 1.213475-2.929043 0.990881-1.246974 LAMPIRAN 12

Tabel 4.15 Impulse Response Function X3 ResponsX3: Period Y X1 X2 X3 1 2.512156-1.422755 0.573660 5.620785 2 4.187017-3.067062 1.567062 3.685155 3 3.013007-3.411311 0.272510 3.436913 4 2.694824-3.691130 0.476523 3.326487 5 2.198037-3.933077 0.574557 2.833737 6 1.861726-4.326203 0.296722 2.574983 7 1.622770-4.678143 0.132847 2.376734 8 1.315438-4.918646 0.084098 2.135772 9 1.028998-5.149584 0.010633 1.910874 10 0.800199-5.389566-0.092160 1.724186

LAMPIRAN 13 60 Response of Y to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations 1200000 Response of X1 to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations 50 1000000 40 800000 30 600000 400000 20 200000 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Y X1 X2 X3-200000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Y X1 X2 X3 4 Response of X2 to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations 6 Response of X3 to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations 3 4 2 2 1 0 0-1 -2-2 -4-3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Y X1 X2 X3-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Y X1 X2 X3 Gambar 4.1 Impulse Response Function (IRF)

LAMPIRAN 14 Tabel 4.16 Variance Decomposition dari Y Variance Decomposition Y Period S.E. Y X1 X2 X3 1 17.15140 100.0000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 2 27.61607 73.42788 19.61403 2.412523 4.545563 3 42.46258 55.58093 30.42920 6.991459 6.998417 4 58.54706 51.32906 32.64210 6.715935 9.312910 5 76.24108 49.79402 32.63027 5.944851 11.63085 6 95.02302 48.09738 33.00068 5.795168 13.10677 7 114.2968 46.66484 33.47126 5.780810 14.08309 8 133.9056 45.75949 33.67081 5.682897 14.88681 9 153.7757 45.12032 33.74305 5.583057 15.55357 10 173.7665 44.57652 33.81824 5.522142 16.08309

LAMPIRAN 15 Tabel 4.17 Variance Decomposition dari X1 Variance Decomposition X1 Period S.E. Y X1 X2 X3 1 204988.4 0.571784 99.42822 0.000000 0.000000 2 427897.1 11.67964 72.97098 0.189180 15.16020 3 718412.5 21.03194 59.13859 0.420983 19.40849 4 1043250. 23.98989 54.51852 1.049518 20.44207 5 1391842. 25.98044 51.43632 1.463143 21.12011 6 1758030. 27.61057 49.01662 1.723279 21.64953 7 2136779. 28.76196 47.28322 1.947542 22.00728 8 2523404. 29.57638 46.03634 2.147430 22.23985 9 2914571. 30.21227 45.06679 2.307814 22.41313 10 3308109. 30.73101 44.27975 2.436412 22.55284

LAMPIRAN 16 Tabel 4.18 Variance Decomposition dari X2 Variabel decomposition of X2 Perio d S.E. Y X1 X2 X3 1 3.798039 30.02012 3.245328 66.73455 0.000000 2 5.125592 37.99135 15.46066 44.59784 1.950156 3 6.218035 41.97814 25.10332 31.46913 1.449405 4 7.060633 41.46882 28.72044 28.18014 1.630600 5 7.756397 39.10256 31.53383 26.83592 2.527689 6 8.435071 37.00824 35.28905 24.47443 3.228274 7 9.099434 34.99084 38.85645 22.33474 3.817962 8 9.722593 32.84205 41.79770 20.82558 4.534673 9 10.32357 30.70458 44.44388 19.53519 5.316353 10 10.91625 28.69664 46.94834 18.29542 6.059601

LAMPIRAN 17 Tabel 4.19 Variance Decomposition dari X3 Variance Decomposition of X3: Perio d S.E. Y X1 X2 X3 1 6.344878 15.67642 5.028217 0.817453 78.47791 2 9.123131 28.64545 13.73411 3.345810 54.27463 3 10.76259 28.42035 19.91494 2.468226 49.19649 4 12.16604 27.14793 24.79020 2.085029 45.97684 5 13.29185 25.47852 29.52440 1.933638 43.06344 6 14.33784 23.58264 34.47799 1.704626 40.23474 7 15.35444 21.68026 39.34648 1.493863 37.47940 8 16.31719 19.84726 43.92694 1.325437 34.90036 9 17.24759 18.11968 48.22991 1.186334 32.46407 10 18.16999 16.52064 52.25573 1.071515 30.15211

60 Response of Y to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations 1200000 Response of X1 to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations 50 1000000 40 800000 30 600000 400000 20 200000 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Y X1 X2 X3-200000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Y X1 X2 X3 4 Response of X2 to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations 6 Response of X3 to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations 3 4 2 2 1 0 0-1 -2-2 -4-3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Y X1 X2 X3-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Y X1 X2 X3 Gambar 4.2 Variance Decomposition