Written Statement for the. Subcommittee on Long-Term Growth and Debt Reduction. Senate Committee on Finance

Similar documents
EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation

EBRI EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RESEARCH INSTITUTE

GAO GENDER PAY DIFFERENCES. Progress Made, but Women Remain Overrepresented among Low-Wage Workers. Report to Congressional Requesters

When comparing this study s results with the HMDA data to the results found in the previous 2001 report, small changes have been found.

Gender Pay Differences: Progress Made, but Women Remain Overrepresented Among Low- Wage Workers

Issue Brief. Characteristics of the Nonelderly with Selected Sources of Health Insurance and Lengths of Uninsured Spells

Trends. o The take-up rate (the A T A. workers. Both the. of workers covered by percent. in Between cent to 56.5 percent.

The Impact of the Recession on Employment-Based Health Coverage

Sources. of the. Survey. No September 2011 N. nonelderly. health. population. in population in 2010, and. of Health Insurance.

Issue Brief. Employment-Based Retirement and Pension Plan Participation: Geographic Differences and Trends EBRI EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Credit history Bad credit history can discourage an individual s chances of being approved for a loan.

EMPLOYEE TENURE IN 2014

Issue Brief. Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2007 Current Population Survey. No.

The Economic Downturn and Changes in Health Insurance Coverage, John Holahan & Arunabh Ghosh The Urban Institute September 2004

ACA Coverage Expansions and Low-Income Workers

Individual Account Retirement Plans: An Analysis of the 2016 Survey of Consumer Finances

Effects of the Oregon Minimum Wage Increase

newstats 2016 NWT Annual Labour Force Activity NWT Bureau of Statistics Overview

Figure 2.1 The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program

The Impact of the Recession on Workers Health Coverage

In 2012, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, about. A Profile of the Working Poor, Highlights CONTENTS U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS

Small Area Health Insurance Estimates from the Census Bureau: 2008 and 2009

Issue Brief No Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2005 Current Population Survey

Retirement Annuity and Employment-Based Pension Income, Among Individuals Aged 50 and Over: 2006

Having a Retirement Plan Can Depend on Industry or Hours Worked

February 2007, Vol. 28, No. 2. Retirement Plan Participation and Asset Allocation, 2004, p. 2 New Publications and Internet Sites, p.

Massachusetts Household Survey on Health Insurance Status, 2007

Sources of Income for Older Persons, 2006

Toshiko Kaneda, PhD Population Reference Bureau (PRB) James Kirby, PhD Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

SOURCES OF INCOME FOR OLDER PERSONS IN 2003

2017:IVQ Nevada Unemployment Rate Demographics Report*

Retirement Plan Coverage of Baby Boomers: Analysis of 1998 SIPP Data. Satyendra K. Verma

Effects of the 1998 California Minimum Wage Increase

2017:IIIQ Nevada Unemployment Rate Demographics Report*

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

The Relationship Between Income and Health Insurance, p. 2 Retirement Annuity and Employment-Based Pension Income, p. 7

2018:IIQ Nevada Unemployment Rate Demographics Report*

WHO S LEFT TO HIRE? WORKFORCE AND UNEMPLOYMENT ANALYSIS PREPARED BY BENJAMIN FRIEDMAN JANUARY 23, 2019

Individual Retirement Account Balances, Contributions, Withdrawals, and Asset Allocation Longitudinal Results : The EBRI IRA Database

Minority Workers Remain Confident About Retirement, Despite Lagging Preparations and False Expectations

Individual Retirement Account Balances, Contributions, Withdrawals, and Asset Allocation Longitudinal Results : The EBRI IRA Database

Rockefeller College University at Albany

Demographic and Other Statistics for Women and Men Aged 50 and Older,

RETIREMENT PLAN COVERAGE AND SAVING TRENDS OF BABY BOOMER COHORTS BY SEX: ANALYSIS OF THE 1989 AND 1998 SCF

Transitions. Population and Economic Trends for Colorado and Garfield County

Minnesota Energy Industry

ROTHESAY PROFILE May 2014

Methodology behind the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta s Labor Force Participation Dynamics

University of Minnesota

Mid - City Industrial

FIGURE I.1 / Per Capita Gross Domestic Product and Unemployment Rates. Year

2016 Labor Market Profile

SHARE OF WORKERS IN NONSTANDARD JOBS DECLINES Latest survey shows a narrowing yet still wide gap in pay and benefits.

Camden Industrial. Minneapolis neighborhood profile. About this area. Trends in the area. Neighborhood in Minneapolis.

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

Shingle Creek. Minneapolis neighborhood profile. About this area. Trends in the area. Neighborhood in Minneapolis. October 2011

Fact Sheet March, 2012

California Workers Retirement Prospects

THE STATE OF WORKING ALABAMA

White Pine County Economic Overview

What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues February 2016

What America Is Thinking About Energy Issues February 2016 Presented by: Harris Poll

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

The Gender Wage Gap by Occupation

Industry Overview. Austin Community College. Emsi Q Data Set. June Emsi Q Data Set

Characteristics of Uninsured North Carolinians

EQUAL PAY: WAGE GAP JANUARY 2018

MEMORANDUM. Gloria Macdonald, Jennifer Benedict Nevada Division of Health Care Financing and Policy (DHCFP)

Health Insurance Coverage in 2014: Significant Progress, but Gaps Remain

Testimony Submission for the Record. House Ways and Means Committee

The Affordable Care Act Has Led To Significant Gains In Health Insurance Coverage And Access To Care For Young Adults

Enrollment Type. Proportion of Non AAS Students by Enrollment Type. UW Colleges Campus Profile: UW Fox Valley

White Pine County. Economic and Demographic Profile, 1999

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

Nationwide 2017 Business Owners Attitudes & Usage (A&U) Study UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 8/22 AT 10:00 A.M. ET

Are Today s Young Workers Better Able to Save for Retirement?

Town Profiles: Demographic, Economic, and Housing Statistics for De Smet City and Wall Town, SOuth Dakota

HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE AMONG WORKERS AND THEIR DEPENDENTS IN NEW YORK,

Enrollment Type. UW Colleges Campus Profile: UW Marathon County. Proportion of Non AAS Students by Enrollment Type

Enrollment Type. UW Colleges Campus Profile: UW Manitowoc. Proportion of Non AAS Students by Enrollment Type

Boomers at Midlife. The AARP Life Stage Study. Wave 2

Debt of the Elderly and Near Elderly,

Nest Egg for Retirement? The Realities of Asset Holdings for Older Adults

A Profile of the Working Poor, 2011

Health Insurance Coverage in the District of Columbia

Table 1 Annual Median Income of Households by Age, Selected Years 1995 to Median Income in 2008 Dollars 1

What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues January 2015

How Economic Security Changes during Retirement

Guernsey Annual Earnings Bulletin

CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH. Union Membership Byte 2018

Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements, May U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS bls.gov

The High Cost of Segregation: Exploring the Relationship Between Racial Segregation and Subprime Lending

Issue Brief. Salary Reduction Plans and Individual Saving for Retirement EBRI EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Results from the 2009 Virgin Islands Health Insurance Survey

Random digital dial Results are weighted to be representative of registered voters Sampling Error: +/-4% at the 95% confidence level

Economic Overview City of Tyler, TX. January 8, 2018

October Mid-Del Technology Center. Economy Overview

Focusing a Gender Lens on New Jersey Employment in Challenging Economic Times

4th Quarter Analysis Australian Late Payments

EPI Issue Brief. Economic Policy Institute May 15, 2003 THE BROAD REACH OF LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYMENT

Transcription:

T-146 Written Statement for the Subcommittee on Long-Term Growth and Debt Reduction Senate Committee on Finance Hearing on: Small Business Pension Plans: How Can We Increase Worker Coverage? Thursday, June 29, 2006 By Craig Copeland Senior Research Associate EBRI Participation by of Small Employers in Employment-Based Retirement Plans

Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, my name is Craig Copeland of the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI), where I am a Senior Research Associate and Project Director of the Social Security Reform Evaluation Program. My focus today is the participation in employment-based retirement plans in small employers, and the demographic characteristics of small employers that affect the participation in these plans. I ll also examine the breakdown of retirement plan participants in each type of plan: defined contribution or 401(k)-type plan and defined benefit pension plan. The definition of a small employer used in this research is one with fewer than employees. The data used to analyze this group s participation in employment-based retirement plans come from the Census Bureau s March 2005 Current Population Survey (CPS). According to these data, 44.7 percent of private-sector wage and salary workers age 21 64 worked for a small employer, 18.2 percent for an employer with fewer than 10 employees, 11.6 percent for an employer with 10 24 employees, and 14.8 percent for one with 25 99 employees (Figure 1). A gap in retirement plan participation between small and large employers has existed for many years, and in 2004 small-firm workers had a participation level half that of large employers: Specifically, 26.7 percent of workers working for employers with fewer than employees participated in an employment-based retirement plan (Figure 2). This breaks down into 16.0 percent at employers with fewer than 10 employees, 27.2 percent at employers with 10 to 24 employees, and 39.6 percent at employers with 25 to 99 employees. This compares with 56.2 percent who worked for an employer with or more employees. The reasons for these differences have been explored in EBRI s Small Employer Retirement Survey, where small employers primarily cited either uncertain profits or lack of employee demand as the key reasons for why they tend to not offer retirement benefits. This lower level of participation among small-employer workers persists across earnings levels, industries, and work status of the employees: For workers at firms with fewer than 10 employees earning less than $15,000 annually, 5 percent were participants, compared with 17 percent in firms with 1,000 or more employees (Figure 3). For workers earning $75,000 or more annually, 36 percent participated in the smallest employers compared with to 86 percent in the largest employers. For three industries (agriculture, mining, and construction; manufacturing; and wholesale and retail trade), the percentage of employees participating in a retirement plan increases from less than 25 percent for employers with fewer than 10 employees to just over 60 percent for employers with 1,000 or more employees (Figure 4). However, the percentage of workers participating in personal services ranges only from 11 percent to 33 percent. Among full-time, full-year workers, the percentage of workers participating increases from 20 percent for the smallest firms to 68 percent for the largest firms (Figure 5). In contrast, among part-time, part-year workers, the percentage participating ranged from 6 percent to 14 percent. Participation by of Small Employers in Employment-Based Retirement Plans 2

While the percentage of workers who participated in a plan was lower across various characteristics of workers or employers, important differences in the types of workers in small versus large employers remain. Small employers have a disproportionate percentage of workers with annual earnings below $15,000: 31 percent at firms with fewer than 10 employees, compared with 20 percent at employers with or more employees (Figure 6). Small employers are more likely to be in the personal service industry and less likely to be in the manufacturing industry, the industries with lowest and highest overall levels of participation, respectively (Figure 7). Small employers have lower shares of full-time workers and higher shares of part-time workers, when compared with larger employers (Figure 8). It is of note that when examining some important worker characteristics such as age, gender, and race/ethnicity no significant differences emerged between the small employer and large employer work forces (Figure 9). The CPS does not include plan type, but the Federal Reserve Board s Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) does provide this information. 1 Participants of employment-based retirement plans working for small employers are more likely to have a defined contribution (401(k)-type) plan as their only plan, relative to participants in larger employers. For example, 77 percent of the participants at firms with 10 19 employees were in a defined contribution plan only, compared with 57 percent at firms with 500 or more employees (Figure 10). While the rates of having only a defined benefit plan (traditional pension) are similar across employer sizes, participants from the largest employers are significantly more likely to have both types of plans (21 percent compared with 6 percent). Smaller employers higher likelihood of having only a defined contribution plan for participants persists across each industry (Figure 11). Despite the lower likelihood of workers at small employers being in an employment-based retirement plan, there is some good news: Their probability of being in a plan has increased since 1991. In 1991, 19.8 percent of workers at firms with 10 24 employees participated in an employment-based retirement plan before growing to 27.2 percent by 2004 (Figure 12). In contrast, for employers with 1,000 or more employees, participation declined from 61.9 percent in 1991 to 59.2 percent in 2004. Thank you and I will be happy to answer any questions you may have. 1 The Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) has similar breakdowns for employer size and industry but not exactly corresponding to the March Current Population Survey (CPS). CPS has employer sizes of fewer than 10, 10 24, 25 99, 999, and 1,000 or more, while the SCF has fewer than 10, 10 19, 20 99, 499, and 500 or more. The industry categories in CPS are agriculture, mining, and construction (which are separated in SCF), manufacturing (same in SCF), wholesale and retail trade (which has some industries that are separated in SCF from the finance, insurance, real estate, and business and repair services and the transportation, communications, public utilities, and personal and professional service industries), and personal services (which is part of the transportation, communications, public utilities, and personal and professional service industry in SCF). Participation by of Small Employers in Employment-Based Retirement Plans 3

Figure 1 Distribution of Private-Sector Wage and Salary Workers Age 21 64, by Employer Size, 2004 6 55.3% 5 44.7% 4 35.2% 18.2% 20.1% 14.8% 11. 10 10 24 25 99 999 1,000 or More Employer Size Figure 2 Percentage of Private-Sector Wage and Salry Workers Age 21 64 Participating in an Employment-Based Retirement Plan, by Employer Size, 2004 7 6 56.2% 59.2% 5 50.8% 4 43. 39. 27.2% 26.7% 16. All 10 10 24 25 99 999 1,000 or More Employer Size Participation by of Small Employers in Employment-Based Retirement Plans 4

Figure 3 Percentage of Private-Sector Wage and Salary Workers Age 21 64 Participating in an Employment- Based Retirement Plan, by Annual Earnings and Employer Size, 2004 9 8 82% 8 72% 73% 7 7 63% 64% 64% 6 58% 54% 5 5 49% 43% 4 39% 3 28% 22% 24% 1 17% 12% 13% 8% Less Than $15,000 $15,000 $29,999 $30,000 $49,999 $50,000 $74,999 $75,000 or more Annual Earnings 10 10 24 25 99 999 1,000 or More Figure 4 Percentage of Private-Sector Wage and Salary Workers Age 21 64 Participating in an Employment- Based Retirement Plan, by Industry and Employer Size, 2004 7 61% 62% 63% 6 52% 54% 5 4 43% 44% 4 3 34% 33% 32% 24% 23% 21% 11% 1 11% 13% Agriculture, mining, and construction Manufacturing Wholesale and retail trade Personal services Industry 10 10 24 25 99 999 1,000 or More Participation by of Small Employers in Employment-Based Retirement Plans 5

8 Figure 5 Percentage of Private-Sector Wage and Salary Workers Age 21 64 Participating in an Employment-Based Retirement Plan, by Work Status and Employer Size, 2004 7 68% 6 59% 5 47% 4 32% 2 37% 34% 9% 1 12% 18% 8% 12% Full-time, full-year Full-time, part-year Part-time, full-year Part-time, part-year Work Status 10 10 24 25 99 999 1,000 or More Figure 6 Distribution of Wage and Salary Workers Age 21 64, by Annual Earnings For Each Employer Size, 2004 3 2 28% 23% 23% 32% 29% 2 2 28% 2 2 23% 19% 1 1 13% 12% 9% 9% 9% 8% 7% Less than $15,000 $15,000 $29,999 $30,000 $49,999 $50,000 $74,999 $75,000 or more Annual Earnings All Fewer than 10 employees 10 24 employees 25 99 employees 999 employees 1,000 or more employees Participation by of Small Employers in Employment-Based Retirement Plans 6

Figure 7 Distribution of Wage and Salary Workers Age 21 64, by Industry for Each Employer Size, 2004 5 47% 4 44% 4 3 38% 3 39% 39% 38% 3 34% 39% 28% 2 19% 17% 24% 22% 1 13% 13% 8% 9% 11% 3% Agriculture, mining, and construction Manufacturing Wholesale and retail trade Personal services Industry All Fewer than 10 employees 10 24 employees 25 99 employees 999 employees 1,000 or more employees Figure 8 Distribution of Wage and Salary Workers Age 21 64, by Work Status for Each Employer Size, 2004 8 7 7 7 72% 73% 7 64% 6 5 4 13% 13% 13% 11% 9% 9% 7% 8% 9% 7% Full-time, full-year Full-time, part-year Part-time, full-year Part-time, part-year Work Status All Fewer than 10 employees 10 24 employees 25 99 employees 999 employees 1,000 or more employees Participation by of Small Employers in Employment-Based Retirement Plans 7

Figure 9 Distribution of Private Sector Wage and Salary Workers 21 64, by Various Characteristics and Employer Size, 2004 Number of Fewer 1,000 All Than 10 10 24 25 99 999 or More All...... Age 21 24 10.6 9.6 12.2 10.0 9.3 11.5 25 34 25.5 23.0 27.5 26.6 25.9 25.4 35 44 26.8 27.6 26.8 26.9 26.4 26.6 45 54 24.1 25.5 22.0 24.1 24.8 23.7 55 64 13.0 14.3 11.5 12.4 13.5 12.8 Gender Male 54.2 56.0 56.7 57.0 53.7 51.5 Female 45.8 44.0 43.3 43.0 46.3 48.5 Race/Ethnicity White 68.6 70.5 67.6 68.9 67.5 68.5 Black 10.7 6.8 8.1 9.3 12.1 13.5 Hispanic 14.3 16.0 18.0 16.5 14.4 11.3 Other 6.3 6.8 6.3 5.4 6.0 6.7 Annual Earnings Less than $15,000 22.9 31.2 27.7 22.5 18.8 19.5 $15,000 $29,999 28.6 30.6 32.2 31.1 29.6 24.8 $30,000 $49,999 25.0 20.1 23.3 26.3 27.7 25.9 $50,000 $74,999 13.0 9.4 9.4 11.6 14.1 16.1 $75,000 or more 10.5 8.8 7.4 8.5 9.7 13.6 Work Status Full-time, full-year 72.3 64.1 70.1 73.1 75.3 75.4 Full-time, part-year 12.9 13.3 14.1 14.0 14.0 11.3 Part-time, full-year 8.5 13.3 8.9 7.4 6.0 7.9 Part-time, part-year 6.2 9.3 6.9 5.5 4.7 5.4 Industry Agriculture, mining, and construction 10.0 18.9 17.5 12.8 8.1 2.8 Manufacturing 37.5 24.1 28.3 35.6 39.1 47.4 Wholesale and retail trade 38.7 35.4 34.3 38.4 44.2 38.9 Personal services 13.8 21.7 20.0 13.1 8.6 10.9 Participation by of Small Employers in Employment-Based Retirement Plans 8

9 Figure 10 Percentage of Employment-Based Retirement Plan Family Head Participants in Each Plan Type, by Employer Size, 2004 83% 82% 8 7 6 77% 7 73% 7 78% 6 57% 57% 5 4 27% 17% 18% 22% 21% 13% Defined Benefit Plan Only Defined Contribution Plan Only Both Plans Any Defined Contribution Plan Plan Type 10 10 19 20 99 499 500 or More Source: Employee Benefit Research Institute estimates from the 2004 Survey of Consumer Finances. Figure 11 Percentage of Employment-Based Retirement Plan Family Head Participants in Each Plan Type, by Industry and Employer Size, 2004 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 9 9 3 42% 22% 6 Agriculture, forestry, and fisheries 24% 71% 7 33% 4 23% 67% 8 8 59% 79% 21% 8 8 8% 74% 18% 92% 73% 7 27% 3% 67% 68% 19% 8 Mining and construction Manufacturing Wholesale and retail trade Finance, insurance, real estate, and business and repair services Industry and Employer Size 22% 78% 51% 18% 69% Transportation, communications, public utilities, and personal and professional services Defined Benefit Plan Only Defined Contribution Plan Only Both Plans Any Defined Contribution Plan Source: Employee Benefit Research Institute estimates from the 2004 Survey of Consumer Finances. Participation by of Small Employers in Employment-Based Retirement Plans 9

7 Figure 12 Percentage of Wage and Salary Workers Age 21 64 Participating in an Employment-Based Retirement Plan, by Employer Size, 1991 and 2004 61.9% 6 1991 2004 59.2% 5 46.8% 50.8% 4 40.8% 43. 39. 27.2% 30.8% 16. 19.8% 11.9% All 10 10 24 25 99 999 1,000 or More Employer Size Participation by of Small Employers in Employment-Based Retirement Plans 10