CEQA Checklist for School Districts

Similar documents
CEQA Portal Topic Paper. Exemptions. What Is An Exemption? Why Are Exemptions Important?

CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

CITY OF LAGUNA WOODS LOCAL CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PROCEDURES

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE RESOLUTION NO.

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CITY OF LOS ANGELES Department of Building & Safety

Section 15085, the City prepared a Notice of Completion of the DEIR that was filed by mail with the State Office of

1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY

[Business and Tax Regulations, Planning Codes - Central South of Market Housing Sustainability District]

How to Participate in the Environmental Review Process. September 29, 2016

A. Certify the UCLA Long Range Development Plan Amendment (2017) and Student Housing Projects Subsequent Environmental Impact Report.

NOVATO GENERAL PLAN 2035 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

Administrative Code Chapter 31 Amendments

RESOLUTION WHEREAS, on July 24, 2017 a Scoping Meeting was noticed and held pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15083; and,

CITY OF PALM DESERT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN

RESOLUTION NO

2/10/2015. AB 52 (Gatto) Native Americans: CEQA AB 1739, SB 1168, SB 1319 Sustainable ab Groundwater Management Act. SB 743 Transportation and Traffic

Heather Hafer, Senior Management Analyst Kate Whan, Public Works Administrative Manager SAN PABLO SUBDIVISION LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DISTRICT A-03

LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MEASURE J BOND CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Signal Hill Safety Element was last updated in 1986; and

5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Planning Commission 101:

2. Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR), dated December Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, dated December 2007.

NEW YORK STATE HOME PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR LOCAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR (LPA) PROGRAMS

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

Disclaimer for Review of Plans

Memorandum \[\<<\\* /7/ TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Barry Ng Jennifer A. Maguire

SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO FISCAL YEAR 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET, AUTHORIZE AMENDMENTS TO CONTRACTS

Solano Local Agency Formation Commission 675 Texas St. Ste Fairfield, California (707) FAX: (707)

The Day After Tomorrow: Post-Bond Issuance Compliance Requirements

AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR NAVE DRIVE MULTI USE PATH (MUP) AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION AMENDING CIP BUDGET

& OUTDOOR OlFTFRONT Z>

JORDAN DOWNS SPECIFIC PLAN DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

MT. SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT PROPOSITION 39, GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (MEASURE R, NOVEMBER 2001) PERFORMANCE AUDIT.

Truckee Railyard Draft Master Plan EIR. Draft Environmental Impact Report Appendices A-B SCH No

EAST CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HCP / NCCP MITIGATION FEE AUDIT DRAFT REPORT AND NEXUS STUDY. Prepared For: Prepared By:

CHAPTER 1 Introduction

BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF NAPA COUNTY

Plumas County Building Department Miscellaneous Construction Permit Application

INITIAL STUDY APPLICATION

RESOLUTION NO

CEQA AND INFILL LEGAL UPDATE: BERKELEY HILLSIDE SB 226. Presentation by Al Herson JD, FAICP Sohagi Law Group SD APA Presentation, April 24, 2012

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Board of Education Report

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA REPORT TO THE: Housing Authority D Successor Agency D Oversight Board D

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

OFFICE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES City Hall 200 N. Spring Street, Room 559 Los Angeles, CA 90012

Agenda Item C.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: April 21, 2015

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

October 4, 2007 Page 1 of 8

Executive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment HEARING DATE: MARCH 29, DAY DEADLINE: JUNE 4, 2018

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM

IN THE NAME OF THE ENVIRONMENT

LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOND CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS: PROPOSITION A PROPOSITION AA MEASURE J

CANNABIS PERMIT APPLICATION

LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOND CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS. Table of Contents. Proposition AA Bond Construction Program

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DRAFT. Los Angeles Community College District

Contents. Ballot Measure Full Text Ballot Proposition Tax Rate Statement Impartial Analysis Statement in Favor of Measure...

STAFF REPORT. Nishi Student Housing Application: Processing Directions

[FWS R1 ES 2016 N013; FXES FF01E00000] Proposed Weyerhaeuser Company Safe Harbor Agreement for the Northern

On motion duly made, seconded and carried, the meeting thereupon adjourned. (Published in the Wichita Eagle on August 19, 2016 and August 26, 2016)

SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2019 RECOMMENDED GENERAL FEE. SCHEDULE. 1. Adopt a resolution approving the FY 2019 General Fee Schedule.

Both bids are substantially higher than the engineer s estimate of $362, The attached Bid Abstract shows the bid details.

City of Stockton Community Development Department 345 N. El Dorado Street Stockton, CA 95202

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR

Reasonable Modification from the Planning Code

Page 2 of 5 CEQA is likely to happen soon. Local officials carrying out the people s business should consider the following tips to help ensure CEQA c

Case No.: N/A Staff Phone #: (805) Environmental Document: N/A 1.0 REQUEST

Article 23-6 FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT

ORDINANCE NO. ## N.S.

PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL FEE SCHEDULE TO INCREASE REFUSE COLLECTION FEES AND SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE FEE

INTERIM DEPT. DIRECTOR: PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THE FY 2017/18 ENCINITAS LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT

OXNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY COUNTY COUNSEL* BOND MEASURE R OXNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT TAX RATE STATEMENT BOND MEASURE R

a) Ensure public safety through reducing the threats to life and personal injury.

3. A CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 2, 2015 SUBJECT:

Barton Brierley, AICP, Community Development Director (Staff Contact: Tyra Hays, AICP, (707) )

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO PREPARE A GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

TOWN OF JUNO BEACH 340 Ocean Drive Juno Beach, FL Phone: (561) Fax: (561)

Special Event Permit Application

LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MEASURE J BOND CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

[Establishment of floodplain management programs and designation of floodplain administrator.]

Item 13: Consideration of a resolution to approve an update to the WCA Billable Rates for FY 18/19.

California Environmental Quality Act PART 2: CEQA Case Law

Policy Role in Land Use Planning

Emergency Relief Program. Ammon Heier, FHWA ER Coordinator

IMPLEMENTATION A. INTRODUCTION C H A P T E R

BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA AIRPORT AUTHORITY Schedule of Customer Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures Year ended June 30, 2016 (With Independent

CITY CLERK. Further Report - Wellesley Central Health Corporation Wellesley Street East (Toronto Centre-Rosedale, Ward 27)

APPENDIX A FULL TEXT OF BOND MEASURE

ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Measure S Bond Program September 2017 Monthly Progress Report

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

The Zoning. Associated. Description N/A. Commission be filed with. been filed. regulation.

City of Monte Sereno

Agreement for Reimbursement of Funds For Construction of Certain Tenant Improvements RECITALS

CITY FUNDS & FUND ACCOUNTING TAB 19

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

WILSHIRE MIRACLE MILE SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT - W.O. E (ANNUAL ASSESSMENT CONFIRMATION)

Transcription:

CEQA Checklist for School Districts (Revised March 2014) Copyright 2014 Lozano Smith For more information, please visit our website at LozanoSmith.com or call us Toll Free at 800.445.9430.

CEQA Checklist for School Districts The following is a preliminary guideline to assist school districts in determining what level of review is required under the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq.) when the districts build new facilities, expand or alter school sites or undertake other projects. Districts may wish to consult with their legal counsel or qualified environmental consultants to confirm the required level of review. I. Is the action to be undertaken by the school district a "project" within the meaning of CEQA? A. Is the action an "approval" within the meaning of CEQA (meaning that a decision is being made that commits the district to a definite course of action)? CEQA consideration must be given to the nature of the action (continue to step I B). No further analysis required. (CEQA Guideline 15352(a).) B. Is the action being taken "discretionary" (may or may not be approved at the district's discretion) or "ministerial" (district must approve if all applicable legal criteria have been met)? Discretionary: Ministerial: Must consider whether the action constitutes a CEQA "project" (continue to step I C). No CEQA analysis is required. (Pub. Resources Code 21080(a), (b)(1); CEQA Guideline 15357 & 15369.) C. Will the action potentially result in a direct or indirect change in the environment? Preliminary CEQA analysis is required (continue to step I D). No further analysis required. (CEQA Guideline 15378.) D. Can it be said with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity could have a significant or even potentially significant effect on the environment? No further CEQA analysis is required. Preliminary CEQA analysis is required (continue to step II). (Pub. Resources Code 21068; CEQA Guideline 15061(b)(3) & 15382.) 1

II. Does the project fall into any CEQA exemption? A. Does the project fall into any statutory CEQA exemption? Examples most likely to apply to school districts: (1) Emergency repairs to a public facility necessary to maintain service; (2) Actions to repair, demolish or replace facilities damaged as a result of a disaster for which the Governor has declared a state of emergency; (3) Actions to prevent or mitigate an emergency; (4) Establishing or modifying fees; (5) Issuing or refunding bonds under the California Educational Facilities Authority Act; and (6) Closing of a public school only if the physical changes resulting from the closure are categorically exempt, as outlined in step II B. (Pub. Resources Code 21080(b)(2), (b)(3), (b)(4), (b)(8); Ed. Code 94212(a).) No further CEQA analysis is required. Consideration should be given to categorical exemptions (continue to step II B). (CEQA Guideline 15061(b)(2).) B. Does evidence support a finding that the project fall into any categorical CEQA exemption? Examples most likely to apply to school districts, each of which apply only if there is no potential of a cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type: Class 1 Operation, repair, maintenance or minor alteration of public facilities, including: adding interior partitions, plumbing, electrical systems; restoring facilities to meet health and safety standards; landscaping maintenance, demolition of small, non-significant structures; and additions to existing structures that will not significantly increase the size of the structure; 2

Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 6 Replacement or reconstruction of existing school facilities at the same capacity, or, if to provide earthquake resistance, where capacity is not increased by more than 50%; New construction or conversion of small structures or installation of small equipment, except for where there is a particularly sensitive environmental setting; Minor alterations to land which do not involve removal of mature, scenic trees unless for forestry and agriculture purposes; also includes grading on less than a 10% slope, minor trenching or filling of earth into excavated areas and similar minor or temporary uses of land; except where there is a particularly sensitive environmental setting; Collection of data or information that would not result in a major disturbance to environmental resources, except for where there is a particularly sensitive environmental setting; Class 11 Construction of minor structures accessory to existing facilities, including on-premise signs or small parking lots, except for where there is a particularly sensitive environmental setting; Class 12 Sale of surplus property that is not of regional concern or that does not have significant environmental sensitivity; Class 14 Minor additions to schools, defined as additions that will not increase student capacity by more than 25% or ten classrooms, whichever is less; Class 22 Adoption of educational or training programs involving no physical alteration or which involve changing only the interior of a school, including changing a school's grade structure unless changes in student transportation will still be required; Class 23 Normal operations of facilities for public gatherings; and Class 32 In fill development in an urban area of less than 5 acres that is consistent with general plan and zoning regulations, where the site has no value as habitat for threatened 3

species, and where the project will not have a significant effect on traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. (CEQA Guideline 15301, 15302, 15303, 15304, 15306, 15311, 15312, 15314, 15322, 15323, & 15332) No further CEQA analysis is required. Preliminary CEQA analysis is required (continue to step III). C. Should a Notice of Exemption be filed with the county clerk? (Note: filing a notice of exemption is optional.) Advantages: Limits period for legal challenge to the school district's action to 35 days from the date of filing; without a Notice of Exemption, the period for a legal challenge is 180 days. Disadvantages: May call unwanted attention to an action being undertaken by a school district. (Pub. Resources Code 21108(b), 21152 & 21167(d); CEQA Guideline 15062.) III. Is an Initial Study required? If the answer to step II is no, then an initial study will be required. (CEQA Guideline 15063.) A. Does the initial study or any fair argument forwarded to the district in response to that study reveal that the project may have a significant or potentially significant environmental effect? The district should consider whether a mitigated negative declaration can be used (continue to step III B). The district should prepare a Negative Declaration. (Public Resources Code 21080(c).) B. Can the potentially significant effects identified by the initial study be mitigated through revisions to the project? The district should prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The district should prepare an Environmental Impact Report (continue to step IV). (Public Resources Code 21080(c).) 4

IV. Is an Environmental Impact Report ( EIR ) required? If the answer to step III B is no, then an environmental impact report will be required. (Public Resources Code 21080(d).) A. Districts should retain qualified environmental consultants and consider working with legal counsel if the more extensive EIR process is required. An EIR can take nine months or more to prepare, so districts should allow ample time when reviewing this checklist and determining whether an EIR may be required. B. Public Review of Draft EIR. C. Certification of EIR. D. Findings of Significant Effects. E. Statement of Overriding Considerations. F. Adoption of Mitigation Monitoring Program. G. Filing of Notice of Determination. Jerry Behrens Harold M. Freiman Lozano Smith Lozano Smith 7404 N. Spalding Avenue 2001 North Main Street, Suite 650 Fresno, CA 93720-3370 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (559) 431-5600 voice (925) 953-1620 voice (559) 261-9366 fax (925) 953-1625 fax jbehrens@lozanosmith.com hfreiman@lozanosmith.com Trevin Sims Lozano Smith 515 S. Figueroa St., Ste. 750 Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 929-1066 voice (213) 929-1077 fax tsims@lozanosmith.com Disclaimer: These materials and all discussions of these materials are for instructional purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. If you need legal advice, you should contact your local counsel or an attorney at Lozano Smith. All rights reserved. No portion of this work may be copied, or sold or used for any commercial advantage or private gain, nor any derivative work prepared therefrom, without the express prior written permission of Lozano Smith through its Managing Partner. The Managing Partner of Lozano Smith hereby grants permission to any client of Lozano Smith to whom Lozano Smith provides a copy to use such copy intact and solely for the internal purposes of such client. 5