Modal Split. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1. 2 Mode choice 2

Similar documents
Transportation Theory and Applications

Transportation Theory and Applications

P = The model satisfied the Luce s axiom of independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA) which can be stated as

Aggregated Binary Logit Modal-Split Model Calibration: An Evaluation for Istanbul

Appendix C: Modeling Process

Studying Sample Sizes for demand analysis Analysis on the size of calibration and hold-out sample for choice model appraisal

Transportation Research Forum

Simplest Description of Binary Logit Model

Car-Rider Segmentation According to Riding Status and Investment in Car Mobility

The Multinomial Logit Model Revisited: A Semiparametric Approach in Discrete Choice Analysis

Modeling the Response to Parking Policy

Diagnostic Evaluation of Public Transportation Mode Choice in Addis Ababa

Drawbacks of MNL. MNL may not work well in either of the following cases due to its IIA property:

HRTPO Strategic Campaign and Vision Plan for Passenger Rail

Automobile Ownership Model

NPTEL Project. Econometric Modelling. Module 16: Qualitative Response Regression Modelling. Lecture 20: Qualitative Response Regression Modelling

The use of logit model for modal split estimation: a case study

Developing Trip Generation Model Utilizing Multiple Regression Analysis

Marsh Barton Rail Station Draft Benefits Realisation Plan and Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

Table 7. MMUTIS Detailed Zoning System. Metro Manila (265) Adjoining Areas (51) 78 zones. Source: MMUTIS, 1996

Demand estimation of Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) using stated preference technique and binary logit models

Puget Sound 4K Model Version Draft Model Documentation

Choice Probabilities. Logit Choice Probabilities Derivation. Choice Probabilities. Basic Econometrics in Transportation.

BEST. Results of the 2010 survey. Helsinki. Oslo. Stockholm. Copenhagen. Vienna. Geneva. Manchester. Berlin. Barcelona

Discrete Choice Model for Public Transport Development in Kuala Lumpur

Logit with multiple alternatives

Nested logit. Michel Bierlaire

Nested logit. Michel Bierlaire

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Environmental Sciences 22 (2014 )

DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL. SUPPLEMENTARY DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTION SCHEME (under Section 49, Planning & Development Act, 2000 as amended)

Policy on claiming Attendance Allowance, Reading/Preparation time, Travel and Subsistence

City of Kingston Information Report to Environment, Infrastructure & Transportation Policies Committee Report Number EITP

T.I.H.E. IT 233 Statistics and Probability: Sem. 1: 2013 ESTIMATION

TECHNICAL NOTE. 1 Purpose of This Document. 2 Basic Assessment Specification

TSHWANE BRT: Development of a Traffic Model for the BRT Corridor Phase 1A Lines 1 and 2

The costs and benefits of concessionary bus travel for older and disabled people in Britain

Transportation Economics and Decision Making. Lecture-11

Public Transport Affordability and Subsidy Policies: A case study of Santiago, Chile. Andrés Gómez-Lobo Transport Forum March 28, 2007

Expense Reimbursement Policy and Procedures

CHAPTER 2 EMPIRICAL AND UTILITY APPROACHES IN MODAL SPLIT ANALYSIS

Policy on claiming Attendance Allowance, Reading/Preparation time, Travel and Subsistence

PUBLIC TRANSPORT TRIP GENERATION PARAMETERS FOR SOUTH AFRICA

Consideration of applications to increase cash, Leap and pre-paid fares from Bus Éireann for 2014

Phase 2 Preliminary Business Case. Appendix E Wider Impacts Report

INSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES OF INDIA EXAMINATIONS. 20 th May Subject CT3 Probability & Mathematical Statistics

Paper 3 Household Segmentation Model

Summarised Expenses & Benefits Policy

Discrete Choice Theory and Travel Demand Modelling

This is a repository copy of Inter-temporal variations in the value of time.

NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre (NETSCC) payments to public contributors

OLIGOPOLY MODELS AT WORK

Appendix T. SANDAG Travel Demand Model Documentation. SANDAG Travel Demand Model Documentation. Appendix Contents

Impacts of Socio-Demographic Changes on the New Zealand Land Transport System

Project Evaluation and Programming I Project Evaluation

Managerial Accounting Prof. Dr. Varadraj Bapat Department School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

THE COBA 2018 USER MANUAL PART 1 ECONOMIC CONCEPTS IN COBA. Contents. Chapter. 1. The COBA Method. 2. The Do-Minimum and Do-Something Options

the display, exploration and transformation of the data are demonstrated and biases typically encountered are highlighted.

The mean-variance portfolio choice framework and its generalizations

Calibration of Nested-Logit Mode-Choice Models for Florida

Gasoline Taxes and Externalities

National Concessionary Bus Travel for Apprentices Executive Summary

REPORT TO THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010

Chapter 6 Simple Correlation and

Biostatistics and Design of Experiments Prof. Mukesh Doble Department of Biotechnology Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

A MODIFIED MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODEL OF ROUTE CHOICE FOR DRIVERS USING THE TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION SYSTEM

Travel and Expenses. Employee Policy HR Consult

Coordinating Urban Land Use, Transportation Pricing & Public Policy

Lecture 1: Logit. Quantitative Methods for Economic Analysis. Seyed Ali Madani Zadeh and Hosein Joshaghani. Sharif University of Technology

TIGER IV. Benefit Cost Analysis. Minot International Airport Access Road. Minot, ND

Downtown Syracuse Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Study. Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

Staff Expenses Policy

DRAFT. Relationship of Asset Condition Rating to Transit System Performance. Prepared for. Transportation Research Board

Exam 1 Review. 1) Identify the population being studied. The heights of 14 out of the 31 cucumber plants at Mr. Lonardo's greenhouse.

HOW EFFECTIVE ARE REWARDS PROGRAMS IN PROMOTING PAYMENT CARD USAGE? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE

Answer Young People Just Like Old People? Impacts and Consequences of Different Household Travel Survey Methods

Rolodex Game in Networks

Commissioned title: Assessing the distributive Impacts of a CC using a synthetic population model

DaySim. Activity-Based Modelling Symposium. John L Bowman, Ph.D.

Practical issues with DTA

What is spatial transferability?

EXPENSES POLICY AND PROCESSES

An analysis of the relationships between motorization and housing planning

Practical example of an Economic Scenario Generator

Paying for Auckland s growth. Contributions Policy 2019 Consultation Document

Title here Briefing on Trans-Sierra Transportation Plan, Transit Connectivity and Statewide Plan Preview Monday, September 15, 2015 Reno, NV

Use of Disaggregate Travel Demand Models to Analyze Car Pooling Policy Incentives

2. Criteria for a Good Profitability Target

Own-Source Revenues for Metropolitan Cities

Americans AV Preferences: Dynamic Ride-Sharing, Privacy & Long-Distance Mode Choices. Dr. Kara Kockelman & Krishna Murthy Gurumurthy

Working Paper No Car Ownership and Mode of Transport to Work in Ireland 1

sociology SO5032 Quantitative Research Methods Brendan Halpin, Sociology, University of Limerick Spring 2018 SO5032 Quantitative Research Methods

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR INTERPRETING SERVICES OF AD HOC DOLMETSCHER & ÜBERSETZUNGEN -INTERPRETERS & TRANSLATIONS GMBH

Estimating Market Power in Differentiated Product Markets

RISKMETRICS. Dr Philip Symes

15. Multinomial Outcomes A. Colin Cameron Pravin K. Trivedi Copyright 2006

The Economic and Social Review, Vol. 41, No. 1, Spring, 2010, pp

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING (PART-6) UNIT- V BUDGETING FOR PROFIT PLANNING & CONTROL (PART-2)

Staff Expenses Policy

Transcription:

Modal Split Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering Prof. Tom V. Mathew Contents 1 Overview 1 2 Mode choice 2 3 Factors influencing the choice of mode 2 4 Types of modal split models 3 4.1 Trip-end modal split models............................ 3 4.2 Trip-interchange modal split models....................... 3 4.3 Aggregate and disaggregate models....................... 4 5 Binary logit model 4 6 Multinomial logit model 6 6.1 Example....................................... 6 7 Summary 8 8 Problems 8 1 Overview The third stage in travel demand modeling is modal split. The trip matrix or O-D matrix obtained from the trip distribution is sliced into number of matrices representing each mode. First the significance and factors affecting mode choice problem will be discussed. Then a brief discussion on the classification of mode choice will be made. Two types of mode choice models will be discussed in detail. ie binary mode choice and multinomial mode choice. The chapter ends with some discussion on future topics in mode choice problem. IIT Bombay (tvm@civil.iitb.ac.in) March 8, 2017 1

2 Mode choice The choice of transport mode is probably one of the most important classic models in transport planning. This is because of the key role played by public transport in policy making. Public transport modes make use of road space more efficiently than private transport. Also they have more social benefits like if more people begin to use public transport, there will be less congestion on the roads and the accidents will be less. Again in public transport, we can travel with low cost. In addition, the fuel is used more efficiently. Main characteristics of public transport is that they will have some particular schedule, frequency etc. On the other hand, private transport is highly flexible. It provides more comfortable and convenient travel. It has better accessibility also. The issue of mode choice, therefore, is probably the single most important element in transport planning and policy making. It affects the general efficiency with which we can travel in urban areas. It is important then to develop and use models which are sensitive to those travel attributes that influence individual choices of mode. 3 Factors influencing the choice of mode The factors may be listed under three groups: 1. Characteristics of the trip maker : The following features are found to be important: (a) car availability and/or ownership; (b) possession of a driving license; (c) household structure (young couple, couple with children, retired people etc.); (d) income; (e) decisions made elsewhere, for example the need to use a car at work, take children to school, etc; (f) residential density. 2. Characteristics of the journey: Mode choice is strongly influenced by: (a) The trip purpose; for example, the journey to work is normally easier to undertake by public transport than other journeys because of its regularity and the adjustment possible in the long run; (b) Time of the day when the journey is undertaken. (c) Late trips are more difficult to accommodate by public transport. 2

3. Characteristics of the transport facility: There are two types of factors.one is quantitative and the other is qualitative. Quantitative factors are: (a) relative travel time: in-vehicle, waiting and walking times by each mode; (b) relative monetary costs (fares, fuel and direct costs); (c) availability and cost of parking Qualitative factors which are less easy to measure are: (a) comfort and convenience (b) reliability and regularity (c) protection, security A good mode choice should include the most important of these factors. 4 Types of modal split models 4.1 Trip-end modal split models Traditionally, the objective of transportation planning was to forecast the growth in demand for car trips so that investment could be planned to meet the demand. When personal characteristics were thought to be the most important determinants of mode choice, attempts were made to apply modal-split models immediately after trip generation. Such a model is called trip-end modal split model. In this way different characteristics of the person could be preserved and used to estimate modal split. The modal split models of this time related the choice of mode only to features like income, residential density and car ownership. The advantage is that these models could be very accurate in the short run, if public transport is available and there is little congestion. Limitation is that they are insensitive to policy decisions example: Improving public transport, restricting parking etc. would have no effect on modal split according to these trip-end models. 4.2 Trip-interchange modal split models This is the post-distribution model; that is modal split is applied after the distribution stage. This has the advantage that it is possible to include the characteristics of the journey and that of the alternative modes available to undertake them. It is also possible to include policy decisions. This is beneficial for long term modeling. 3

4.3 Aggregate and disaggregate models Mode choice could be aggregate if they are based on zonal and inter-zonal information. They can be called disaggregate if they are based on household or individual data. 5 Binary logit model Binary logit model is the simplest form of mode choice, where the travel choice between two modes is made. The traveler will associate some value for the utility of each mode. if the utility of one mode is higher than the other, then that mode is chosen. But in transportation, we have disutility also. The disutility here is the travel cost. This can be represented as c a 1 t v ij +a 2t w ij +a 3t t ij +a 4t nij +a 5 F ij +a 6 φ j +δ (1) where t v ij is the in-vehicle travel time between i and j, tw ij is the walking time to and from stops, t t ij is the waiting time at stops, F ij is the fare charged to travel between i and j, φ j is the parking cost, and δ is a parameter representing comfort and convenience. If the travel cost is low, then that mode has more probability of being chosen. Let there be two modes (m=1,2) then the proportion of trips by mode 1 from zone i to zone j is(p 1 ij ) Let c1 ij be the cost of traveling from zone i to zonej using the mode 1, and c 2 ij be the cost of traveling from zonei to zone j by mode 2,there are three cases: 1. if c 2 ij - c 1 ij is positive, then mode 1 is chosen. 2. if c 2 ij - c 1 ij is negative, then mode 2 is chosen. 3. if c 2 ij - c1 ij = 0, then both modes have equal probability. This relationship is normally expressed by a logit curve as shown in figure 1 Therefore the proportion of trips by mode 1 is given by e βc1 ij Pij 1 = T1 ij /T (2) e βc1 ij +e βc 2 ij This functional form is called logit, where c ij is called the generalized cost and β is the parameter for calibration. The graph in figure 1 shows the proportion of trips by mode 1 (T 1 ij /T ij) against cost difference. 5.0.1 Example Let the number of trips from zone i to zone j is 5000, and two modes are available which has the characteristics given in Table 1. Compute the trips made by mode bus, and the fare that is collected from the mode bus. If the fare of the bus is reduced to 6, then find the fare collected. 4

p 1 1.0 ij B 2 0.5 B 1 c 2 ij c1 ij Figure 1: logit function Table 1: Trip characterisitcs t u ij t w ij t t ij f ij φ j car 20-18 4 bus 30 5 3 9 a i 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.1 0.1 Table 2: Binary logit model example: solution t u ij t w ij t t ij f ij φ j c ij p ij T ij ar 20-18 4 2.08.52 2600 bus 30 5 3 9 2.18.475 2400 a i.03.04.06.1.1 5

Solution The base case is given below. Cost of travel by car (Equation)=c car = 0.03 20+18 0.06+4 0.1 = 2.08 Cost of travel by bus (Equation)=c bus = 0.03 30+0.04 5+0.06 3+0.1 9 = 2.18 Probability of choosing mode car (Equation)= p car e 2.08 e 2.08 +e 2.18 = 0.52 Probability of choosing mode bus (Equation)= p bus e 2.18 e 2.08 +e 2.18 = 0.475 Proportion of trips by car = T car 5000 0.52 = 2600 Proportion of trips by bus = T bus 5000 0.475 = 2400 Fare collected from bus = T bus ij F 2400 9 = 21600 When the fare of bus gets reduced to 6, Cost function for bus= c bus = 0.03 30+0.04 5+0.06 3+0.1 6 = 1.88 Probability of choosing mode bus (Equation)=p bus Proportion of trips by bus = T bus 5000 0.55 = 2750 Fare collected from the bus T bus ij F 2750 6 = 16500 The results are tabulated in table e 1.88 e 2.08 +e 1.88 = 0.55 6 Multinomial logit model The binary model can easily be extended to multiple modes. The equation for such a model can be written as: 6.1 Example Pij 1 = e βc1 ij Σe βcm ij Let the number of trips from i to j is 5000, and three modes are available which has the characteristics given in Table 3: Compute the trips made by the three modes and the fare required to travel by each mode. (3) 6

Table 3: Trip characteristics t v ij t walk ij t t ij F ij φ ij coefficient 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.1 0.1 car 20 - - 18 4 bus 30 5 3 6 - train 12 10 2 4 - Table 4: Multinomial logit model problem: solution t v ij t walk ij t t ij F ij φ ij C e C p ij T ij coeff 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.1 0.1 - - - - car 20 - - 18 4 2.8 0.06 0.1237 618.5 bus 30 5 3 6-1.88 0.15 0.3105 1552.5 train 12 10 2 4-1.28 0.28 0.5657 2828.5 Solution Cost of travel by car (Equation)=c car = 0.03 20+18 0.1+4 0.1 = 2.8 Cost of travel by bus (Equation)=c bus = 0.03 30+0.04 5+0.06 3+0.1 6 = 1.88 Cost of travel by train (Equation)=c train = 0.03 12 + 0.04 10+0.06 2+0.1 4 = 1.28 Probability of choosing mode car (Equation)p car e 2.8 e 2.8 +e 1.88 +e 1.28 = 0.1237 Probability of choosing mode bus (Equationp bus e 1.88 e 2.8 +e 1.88 +e 1.28 = 0.3105 Probability of choosing mode train (Equation)= p train e 1.28 e 2.8 +e 1.88 +e 1.28 = 0.5657 Proportion of trips by car,t car 5000 0.1237 = 618.5 Proportion of trips by bus, T bus 5000 0.3105 = 1552.5 Similarly, proportion of trips by train,t train ij in the form of a table as shown below 4: = 5000 0.5657 = 2828.5 We can put all this Fare collected from the mode bus = T bus ij F 1552.5 6 = 9315 Fare collected from mode train = T train ij F 2828.5 4 = 11314 7

Table 5: Trip characteristics t v ij t walk ij t t ij F ij φ ij coefficient 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.2 0.2 car 25 - - 22 6 bus 35 8 6 8 - train 17 14 5 6-7 Summary Modal split is the third stage of travel demand modeling. The choice of mode is influenced by various factors. Different types of modal split models are there. Binary logit model and multinomial logit model are dealt in detail in this chapter. 8 Problems 1. The total number of trips from zone i to zone j is 4200. Currently all trips are made by car. Government has two alternatives- to introduce a train or a bus. The travel characteristics and respective coefficients are given in table 5. Decide the best alternative in terms of trips carried. Solution First, use binary logit model to find the trips when there is only car and bus. Then, again use binary logit model to find the trips when there is only car and train. Finally compare both and see which alternative carry maximum trips. Cost of travel by car=c car = 0.05 25+0.2 22+0.2 6 = 6.85 Cost of travel by bus=c bus = 0.05 35+0.04 8+0.07 6+0.2 8 = 4.09 Cost of travel by trai=c train = 0.05 17+0.04 14+0.07 5+0.2 6 = 2.96 Case 1: Considering introduction of bus, Probability of choosing car,p car e 6.85 e 6.85 +e 4.09 = 0.059 Probability of choosing bus, p bus e 4.09 e 6.85 +e 4.09 = 0.9403 Case 2: Considering introduction of train, Probability of choosing car p car e 6.85 e 6.85 +e 2.96 = 0.02003 Probability of choosing train p train e 2.96 e 6.85 +e 2.96 = 0.979 8

Trips carried by each mode Case 1: T car 4200 0.0596 = 250.32 T bus 4200 0.9403 = 3949.546 Case 2: T car 4200 0.02 = 84.00 T train 4200 0.979 = 4115.8 Hence train will attract more trips, if it is introduced. Acknowledgments I wish to thank several of my students and staff of NPTEL for their contribution in this lecture. I also appreciate your constructive feedback which may be sent to tvm@civil.iitb.ac.in Prof. Tom V. Mathew Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India 9