R. Selvi 1, P. Thangavelu 2. Sri Parasakthi College for Women Courtallam, INDIA 2 Department of Mathematics

Similar documents
Epimorphisms and Ideals of Distributive Nearlattices

Fuzzy L-Quotient Ideals

Laurence Boxer and Ismet KARACA

Laurence Boxer and Ismet KARACA

More On λ κ closed sets in generalized topological spaces

Separation axioms on enlargements of generalized topologies

Homomorphism and Cartesian Product of. Fuzzy PS Algebras

CONGRUENCES AND IDEALS IN A DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICE WITH RESPECT TO A DERIVATION

COMBINATORICS OF REDUCTIONS BETWEEN EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS

Ordered Semigroups in which the Left Ideals are Intra-Regular Semigroups

THE NUMBER OF UNARY CLONES CONTAINING THE PERMUTATIONS ON AN INFINITE SET

Translates of (Anti) Fuzzy Submodules

BINOMIAL TRANSFORMS OF QUADRAPELL SEQUENCES AND QUADRAPELL MATRIX SEQUENCES

Cartesian Product of Two S-Valued Graphs

4: SINGLE-PERIOD MARKET MODELS

FUZZY PRIME L-FILTERS

CHARACTERIZATION OF CLOSED CONVEX SUBSETS OF R n

Non replication of options

Optimal Allocation of Policy Limits and Deductibles

REMARKS ON K3 SURFACES WITH NON-SYMPLECTIC AUTOMORPHISMS OF ORDER 7

The Binomial Theorem and Consequences

Hyperidentities in (xx)y xy Graph Algebras of Type (2,0)

Fuzzy Join - Semidistributive Lattice

SEMICENTRAL IDEMPOTENTS IN A RING

Game Theory: Normal Form Games

Level by Level Inequivalence, Strong Compactness, and GCH

1 Directed sets and nets

X i = 124 MARTINGALES

Some derivative free quadratic and cubic convergence iterative formulas for solving nonlinear equations

arxiv: v1 [math.lo] 27 Mar 2009

Interpolation of κ-compactness and PCF

In Discrete Time a Local Martingale is a Martingale under an Equivalent Probability Measure

Applied Mathematics Letters

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.lo] 9 Dec 2006

Fractional Graphs. Figure 1

Expected Value and Variance

CATEGORICAL SKEW LATTICES

arxiv: v2 [math.lo] 13 Feb 2014

Outline of Lecture 1. Martin-Löf tests and martingales

Lecture Notes 1

GUESSING MODELS IMPLY THE SINGULAR CARDINAL HYPOTHESIS arxiv: v1 [math.lo] 25 Mar 2019

ORDERED SEMIGROUPS HAVING THE P -PROPERTY. Niovi Kehayopulu, Michael Tsingelis

Some Remarks on Finitely Quasi-injective Modules

Projective Lattices. with applications to isotope maps and databases. Ralph Freese CLA La Rochelle

NOTES ON (T, S)-INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SUBHEMIRINGS OF A HEMIRING

A Fuzzy Vertex Graceful Labeling On Friendship and Double Star Graphs

On the h-vector of a Lattice Path Matroid

The finite lattice representation problem and intervals in subgroup lattices of finite groups

Essays on Some Combinatorial Optimization Problems with Interval Data

A construction of short sequences containing all permutations of a set as subsequences Radomirovi, Saša

PARTITIONS OF 2 ω AND COMPLETELY ULTRAMETRIZABLE SPACES

BETA DISTRIBUTION ON ARITHMETICAL SEMIGROUPS

CONSTRUCTION OF CODES BY LATTICE VALUED FUZZY SETS. 1. Introduction. Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 35, No. 2, 2005,

Game Theory. Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari. Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India August 2012

Theorem 1.3. Every finite lattice has a congruence-preserving embedding to a finite atomistic lattice.

Best response cycles in perfect information games

Notes on Natural Logic

V. Fields and Galois Theory

Capital Allocation Principles

Equivalence between Semimartingales and Itô Processes

A note on the number of (k, l)-sum-free sets

ISSN BWPEF Uninformative Equilibrium in Uniform Price Auctions. Arup Daripa Birkbeck, University of London.

5 Deduction in First-Order Logic

CONSISTENCY AMONG TRADING DESKS

Web Appendix: Proofs and extensions.

Best-Reply Sets. Jonathan Weinstein Washington University in St. Louis. This version: May 2015

Collinear Triple Hypergraphs and the Finite Plane Kakeya Problem

Existence of Nash Networks and Partner Heterogeneity

10.1 Elimination of strictly dominated strategies

On the Lower Arbitrage Bound of American Contingent Claims

Horn-formulas as Types for Structural Resolution

PAijpam.eu ANALYTIC SOLUTION OF A NONLINEAR BLACK-SCHOLES EQUATION

Equivalence Nucleolus for Partition Function Games

Equilibrium payoffs in finite games

A Property Equivalent to n-permutability for Infinite Groups

The illustrated zoo of order-preserving functions

Lecture l(x) 1. (1) x X

A relation on 132-avoiding permutation patterns

The internal rate of return (IRR) is a venerable technique for evaluating deterministic cash flow streams.

Sy D. Friedman. August 28, 2001

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

No-arbitrage Pricing Approach and Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing

The Real Numbers. Here we show one way to explicitly construct the real numbers R. First we need a definition.

A Translation of Intersection and Union Types

Math 546 Homework Problems. Due Wednesday, January 25. This homework has two types of problems.

Approximate Revenue Maximization with Multiple Items

Continuous images of closed sets in generalized Baire spaces ESI Workshop: Forcing and Large Cardinals

CARDINALITIES OF RESIDUE FIELDS OF NOETHERIAN INTEGRAL DOMAINS

Option Pricing under Delay Geometric Brownian Motion with Regime Switching

Notes, Comments, and Letters to the Editor. Cores and Competitive Equilibria with Indivisibilities and Lotteries

Chapter 3 Common Families of Distributions. Definition 3.4.1: A family of pmfs or pdfs is called exponential family if it can be expressed as

Additional Review Exam 1 MATH 2053 Please note not all questions will be taken off of this. Study homework and in class notes as well!

TR : Knowledge-Based Rational Decisions and Nash Paths

Finite Additivity in Dubins-Savage Gambling and Stochastic Games. Bill Sudderth University of Minnesota

Pricing theory of financial derivatives

Wada s Representations of the. Pure Braid Group of High Degree

A note on the stop-loss preserving property of Wang s premium principle

Discounted Stochastic Games

maps 1 to 5. Similarly, we compute (1 2)(4 7 8)(2 1)( ) = (1 5 8)(2 4 7).

LATTICE EFFECT ALGEBRAS DENSELY EMBEDDABLE INTO COMPLETE ONES

Transcription:

International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 87 No. 6 2013, 817-825 ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version) url: http://www.ijpam.eu doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v87i6.10 PAijpam.eu ON CONTRA ρ-continuity AND ALMOST CONTRA ρ-continuity WHERE ρ {L,M,R,S} R. Selvi 1, P. Thangavelu 2 1 Department of Mathematics Sri Parasakthi College for Women Courtallam, INDIA 2 Department of Mathematics Karunya University Coimbatore, 641114, INDIA Abstract: In the year 2012, the authors introduced the concept of ρ-continuity and almost ρ-continuity between a topological space and a non empty set where ρ {L,M,R,S}. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the concepts of contra ρ-continuity and almost contra ρ-continuity between a topological space and a non empty set. AMS Subject Classification: 32A12, 54C05, 54C60, 26E25 Key Words: multi-functions, saturated set, continuity 1. Introduction By a multifunction F : X Y, we mean a point to set correspondence from X into Y with F(X) φ for all x X. Any function f : X Y induces a multifunction f 1 f : X (X). It also induces another multifunction f f 1 : Y (Y) provided f is surjective. The notions of L-continuity, R-continuity and S-continuity of a function f : X Y between a topological space and a non-empty set are studied by the authors[3, 4]. Further almost ρ-continuity has been investigated by the authors[5]. In this paper contra ρ- Received: September 6, 2013 c 2013 Academic Publications, Ltd. url: www.acadpubl.eu

818 R. Selvi, P. Thangavelu continuity and almost ρ-continuity are introduced and their basic properties are studied. 2. Preliminaries The following definitions and results that are due to the authors Navpreet Singh Noorie and Rajni Bala[2] will be useful in sequel. Definition 2.1. Let f : X Y be any map and E be any subset of X. Then (1) f # (E) = {y Y : f 1 E}; (2) E # = f 1 (f # (E). [2] Lemma 2.2. Let E be a subset of X and let f : X Y be a function. Then (1) f # (E) = Y f(x/e); (2) f(e) = Y f # (XE). [2] The next two lemmas are the consequences of the above Lemma. Lemma 2.3. Let E be a subset of X and let f : X Y be a function. Then(1)f 1 (f # (E)) = X/f 1 (f(x/e)); (2)f 1 (f(e)) = X/f 1( f # (X/E) ). [4] Lemma 2.4. Let E be a subset of X and let f : X Y be a function. Then (1) f # (f 1 (E)) = Y/f(f 1 (Y/E)); (2) f(f 1 (E)) = Y/f # (f 1 (Y/E)). [4] For, ρ-continuous, almost ρ-continuous and contra continuous functions, the reader can refer [3, 4, 5, 1]. 3. Contra ρ-continuity, where ρ {L,M,R,S} Definition 3.1. Let f : (X,τ) Y be a function. Then f is contra L- continuous (resp. contra M-continuous) if f 1 (f(a)) is open (resp. closed)in X for every closed (resp. open) set A in X. Definition 3.2. Let f : X (Y,σ) be a function. Then f is contra R-continuous (resp. contra S-continuous) if f(f 1 (B)) is open (resp. closed) in Y for every closed (resp. open) set B in Y. Theorem 3.3. Let f : (X,τ) (Y,σ) be open (resp.closed) and contra continuous. Then f is contra M R-continuous (resp. contra LS-continuous). Proof. Let A X be open in X. Since f is open (resp. closed), f(a) is open (resp. closed) in Y. Again since f is contra continuous f 1 (f(a)) is

ON CONTRA ρ-continuity AND ALMOST 819 closed (resp. open) in X. Therefore f is contra M-continuous (resp. contra L- continuous). Now let B be a closed (resp. open) subset of Y. Since f is contra continuous, f 1 (B) is open (resp. closed) in X. Since f is open (resp. closed) f(f 1 (B)) is open (resp. closed) in Y. Therefore f is contra R-continuous (resp. contra S-continuous).This shows that f is contra M R-continuous (resp. contra LS-continuous). Corollary 3.4. Let f : (X,τ) (Y,σ) be open, closed and contra continuous. Then f is contra ρ-continuous where ρ {L,M,R,S}. Proof. Follows from Theorem 3.3. Theorem 3.5. Let g : Y Z and f : X Y be any two functions. Then the following hold. (1) Let f be closed (resp. open) and continuous. If g is contra L-continuous (resp. contra M-continuous) then g f : X Z is contra L-continuous (resp. contra M-continuous). (2) Let g be open (resp. closed) and continuous. If f is contra R-continuous (resp. contra S-continuous) then g f : X Z is contra R-continuous (resp. contra S-continuous). Proof. Suppose g is contra L-continuous (resp. contra M-continuous. Let f be closed (resp. open) and continuous. Let A be closed (resp. open) in X. Then (g f) 1 (g f)(a) = f 1 (g 1 (g(f(a)))). Since f is closed (resp. open), f(a) is closed (resp. open) in Y. Since g is contra L-continuous, g 1 (g(f(a))) is open (resp. closed) in Y. Since f is continuous, f 1 (g 1 (g(f(a)))) is open (resp. closed) in X. Therefore, g f is contra L-continuous (resp. contra M-continuous). This proves (1). Let f : X Y be contra R -continuous (resp. contra S-continuous) and g : Y Z be open (resp. closed) and continuous. Let B be closed (resp. open) in Z. Then (g f)(g f) 1 (B) = (g f)(f 1 g 1(B)) = g(f(f 1 (g 1 (B)))). Since g is continuous, g 1 (B) is closed (resp. open) in Y. Since f is contra R- continuous (resp. contra S-continuous), f(f 1 (g 1(B))) is open (resp. closed) in Y. Since g is open (resp. closed), g(f(f 1 (g 1 (B)))) is open (resp. closed) in Z. Therefore, g f is contra R-continuous (resp. contra S-continuous). This proves (2).

820 R. Selvi, P. Thangavelu Theorem 3.6. Let f : X Y be a function and A be a subset of X. Then the following hold. If f : X Y is contra M-continuous (resp. contra L-continuous) and if A is an open (resp. closed) subspace of X then the restriction of f to A is contra M-continuous (resp. contra L-continuous). Proof. Suppose f : X Y is contra M-continuous (resp. contra L- continuous) and if A is an open (resp. closed) subspace of X. Let h = f A. Then h = f j where j is the inclusion map j : A X. Since A is open (resp. closed), j is open (resp. closed) and continuous. Since f : X Y is contra M-continuous (resp. contra L-continuous), using Theorem 3.5(1), h is contra M-continuous (resp. contra L-continuous). Theorem 3.7. Let f : X Y be a function f(x) Z Y. Suppose h : X Z is defined by h(x) = f(x) for all x X. Then the following hold. If f : X Y is contra R-continuous (resp. contra S-continuous) and f(x) be open (resp.closed) in Z, then h is contra R-continuous (resp. contra S-continuous). Proof. By the Definition of h, we see that h = j f where j : f(x) Z is an inclusion map. Suppose f : X Y is contra R-continuous (resp.contra S-continuous) and f(x) is open (resp.closed) in Z, that implies the inclusion map j is both open (resp.closed) and continuous. Then by applying Theorem 3.5(2), h is contra R-continuous (resp.contra S-continuous). 4. Almost Contra ρ-continuity Definition 4.1. Let f : (X,τ) Y be a function. Then f is almost contra L-continuous (resp. almost contra M-continuous) if f 1 (f(a)) is open (resp. closed) in X for every regular closed (resp. open) set A in X. Definition 4.2. Let f : X (Y,σ) be a function. Then f is almost contra R-continuous (resp. almost contra S-continuous) if f(f 1 (B)) is open (resp. closed) in Y for every regular closed (resp. open) set B in Y. It is clear that contra ρ-continuity almost contra ρ-continuity. Theorem 4.3. Let X be a topological space. If A is a regular closed (resp. regular open) subspace of X, the inclusion function j : A X is almost contra L-continuous and almost contra R-continuous (resp. almost contra M- continuous and almost contra S-continuous).

ON CONTRA ρ-continuity AND ALMOST 821 Proof. Let j : A X be the inclusion function. Let U X be regular closed (resp. regular open) in X. Then j(j 1 (U)) = j(u A) = U A which is open (resp. closed) in X. Hence j is almost contra R-continuous (resp. almost contra S-continuous). Now let U A be regular closed (resp.regular open) in A. Then j 1 (j(u)) = j 1 (U) = U which is open (resp. closed) in A. Hence j is almost contra L-continuous (resp. almost contra M-continuous).This shows that j is almost contra LR-continuous. Theorem 4.4. Let g : Y Z and f : X Y be any two functions. Then the following hold. (1) If g is almost contra L-continuous (resp. almost contra M-continuous) and let f be closed (resp. open) and continuous then g f is almost contra L-continuous (resp. almost contra M-continuous). (2) If g is open (resp. closed) and almost continuous and f is contra R- continuous (resp. contra S-continuous), then g f is almost contra R- continuous (resp. almost contra S-continuous). Proof. Suppose g is almost contra L-continuous (resp. almost contra M- continuous) and f is regular closed (resp. regular open) and continuous. Let A be regular closed (resp. regular open) in X. Then (g f) 1 (g f)(a) = f 1 (g 1 (g(f(a)))). Since f is regular closed (resp. regular open), f(a) is regular closed (resp. regular open) in Y. Since g is almost contra L-continuous (resp. almost contra M-continuous), g 1 (g(f(a))) is open (resp. closed) in Y. Sincef iscontinuous, f 1 (g 1 (g(f(a)))) isopen(resp. closed)inx. Therefore, g f is almost contra L-continuous (resp. almost contra M-continuous).This proves (1). Let f : X Y be contra R-continuous (resp. contra S-continuous) and g : Y Z be open (resp. closed) and continuous. Let B be regular closed (resp. regular open) in Z. Then (g f)(g f) 1 (B) = (g f)(f 1 g 1 (B)) = g(f(f 1 (g 1 (B)))). Since g is almost continuous, g 1 (B) is closed (resp. open) in Y. Since f is contra R-continuous (resp. contra S-continuous), ff 1 (g 1 (B)) is open (resp. closed) in Y. Since g is open (resp. closed) g(f(f 1 (g 1 (B)))) is open (resp. closed) in Z. Therefore, g f is almost contra R-continuous(almost contra S-continuous). This proves (2). We establish the pasting Lemmas for contra R-continuous, contra S-continuous, almost contra R-continuous and almost contra S-continuous functions.

822 R. Selvi, P. Thangavelu Theorem 4.5. Let X = A B. Let f : A (Y,σ) and g : B (Y,σ) be contra R-continuous (resp. contra S-continuous) functions. If f(x) = g(x) for every x A B, the function h : X Y defined by { f(x), x A h(x) = g(x), x B is contra R-continuous (resp. contra S-continuous). Proof. Let C be a open (resp. closed) set in Y. Now h h 1 = h(f 1 (c) g 1 (c)) = h(f 1 (c)) h(g 1 (c)) = f(f 1 (c)) g(g 1 (c)). Since f is contra R-continuous (resp. contra S-continuous), f(f 1 (C)) is open (resp. closed) in Y and since g is contra R-continuous (resp. contra S-continuous), g(g 1 (C)) is open (resp. closed) in Y. Therefore, h h 1 (C) is also open (resp. closed) in Y. This shows that h is contra R-continuous (resp. contra S-continuous). Theorem 4.6. Let X = A B. Let f : A (Y,σ) and g : B (Y,σ) be almost contra R-continuous (resp. almost contra S-continuous)functions. If f(x) = g(x) for every x A B, the function h : X Y defined by { f(x), x A h(x) = g(x), x B is almost contra R-continuous (resp. almost contra S-continuous). Proof. Let C be a regular open (resp. closed) set in Y. Now h h 1 = h(f 1 (c) g 1 (c)) = h(f 1 (c)) h(g 1 (c)) = f(f 1 (c)) g(g 1 (c)) Since f is almost contra R-continuous (resp. almost contra S-continuous), f(f 1 (C)) is open (resp. closed) in Y and since g is almost contra R-continuous (resp. almost contra S-continuous), g(g 1 (C)) is open (resp. closed) in Y. Therefore, h h 1 (C) is also open (resp. closed) in Y. This shows that h is almost contra R-continuous (resp. almost contra S-continuous).

ON CONTRA ρ-continuity AND ALMOST 823 5. Characterizations In this section, we characterize contra ρ-continuity and almost contra ρ-continuity functions by the hash function f # of f : X Y. Theorem 5.1. The function f : X Y is contra L-continuous if and only if f 1 (f # (A)) is closed in X for every open subset G of X. Proof. Suppose f is contra L-continuous. Let G be open in X. Then A = X/G is closed in X. By Lemma 2.3(1) f 1 (f # (G)) = X/f 1 (f(a)). Since f is contra L- continuous, and since A is closed in X, f 1 (f(a)) is open in X. Hence f 1 (f # (G)) is closed in X. Conversely, assume that f 1 (f # (G)) is closed in X for every open subset G of X. Let A be closed in X. By Lemma 2.3(2), f 1 (f(a)) = X/f 1 (f # (G)) whereg = X/A. Byourassumption,f 1 (f # (G))isclosedandhencef 1 (f(g)) is open in X. Therefore f is contra L-continuous. Theorem 5.2. The function f : X Y is contra M-continuous if and only if f 1 (f # (A)) is open in X for every closed subset A of X. Proof. Suppose f is contra M-continuous. Let A be closed in X. Then G = X/A is open in X. By Lemma 2.3(1), f 1 (f # (A)) = X/f 1 (f(g)). Since f is contra M-continuous and since G is open in X, f 1 (f(g)) is closed in X. Hence f 1 (f # (A)) is open in X. Conversely, assume that f 1 (f # (A)) is open in X for every closed subset G of X. Let G be open in X. By Lemma 2.3(2), f 1 (f(g)) = X/f 1 (f # (A)) wherea=x/g. By our assumption, f 1 (f # (A)) is open and hencef 1 (f(g)) is closed in X. Therefore f is contra M-continuous. Theorem 5.3. The function f : X Y is contra R-continuous if and only if f # (f 1 (G)) is closed in Y for every open subset G of Y. Proof. Suppose f is contra R-continuous. Let G be open in Y. Then A = Y/G is closed in Y. By Lemma 2.4(1), f # (f 1 (G)) = Y/f(f 1 (A)). Since f is contra R-continuous and since A is closed in Y, f(f 1 (A)) is open in Y. Hence f # (f 1 (A)) is closed in Y. Conversely, assume that f # (f 1 (A)) is closed in Y for every open subset G of Y. Let A be closed in Y. By Lemma 2.4(2), f(f 1 (A)) = Y/f # (f 1 (G)) where G = Y/A. By our assumption, f(f 1 (G)) is closed and hence f(f 1 (A)) is open in Y. Therefore f is contra R-continuous.

824 R. Selvi, P. Thangavelu Theorem 5.4. The function f : X Y is contra S-continuous if and only if f # (f 1 (A)) is open in Y for every closed subset A of Y. Proof. Suppose f is contra S-continuous. Let A be open in Y. Then G = Y/A is open in Y. By Lemma 2.4(1), f # (f 1 (A)) = X/f(f 1 (G)). Since f is contra S-continuous and since G is open in Y, ff 1 (G)) is closed in Y. Hence f # (f 1 (A)) is open in Y. Conversely, assume that f # (f 1 (A)) is open in Y for every closed subset A of Y. Let G be open in Y. By Lemma 2.4(2), f(f 1 (G)) = X/f # (f 1 (A)) where A = Y/G. By our assumption, f # (f 1 (A)) is open in Y and hence f(f 1 (G)) is closed in Y. Therefore f is contra S-continuous. Theorem 5.5. The function f : X Y is almost contra L-continuous if and only if f 1 (f # (A)) is closed in X for every open subset G of X. Proof. Suppose f is almost contra L-continuous. Let G be regular open in X. Then A = X/G is regular closed in X. By Lemma 2.3(1), f 1 (f # (G)) = X/f 1 (f(a)). Since f is almost contra L-continuous and since A is regular closed in X, f 1 (f(a)) is open in X. Hence f 1 (f # (G)) is closed in X. Conversely, assume that f 1 (f # (G)) is closed in X for every open subset G of X. Let A be regular closed in X. By Lemma 2.3(2), f 1 (f(a)) = X/f 1 (f # (G)) where G = X/A. By our assumption, f 1 (f # (G)) is closed and hence f 1 (f(g)) is open in X. Therefore f is almost contra L-continuous. Theorem 5.6. The function f : X Y is almost contra M-continuous if and only if f 1 (f # (A)) is open in X for every regular closed subset A of X. Proof. Suppose f is almost contra M-continuous. Let A be regular closed in X. Then G = X/A is regular open in X. By Lemma 2.3(1), f 1 (f # (A)) = X/f 1 (f(g)). Since f is almost contra M-continuous and since G is regular open in X, f 1 (f(g)) is closed in X. Hence f 1 (f # (A)) is open in X. Conversely, assume that f 1 (f # (A)) is open in X for every regular closed subset A of X. Let G be regular open in X. By Lemma 2.3(2), f 1 (f(g)) = X/f 1 (f # (A)) where A = X/G. By our assumption, f 1 (f # (A)) is open in X. And hence f 1 (f(g)) is closed in X. Therefore f is almost contra M- continous. Theorem 5.7. The function f : X Y is almost contra R-continuous if and only if f # (f 1 (G)) is closed in Y for every regular open subset G of Y.

ON CONTRA ρ-continuity AND ALMOST 825 Proof. Suppose f is almost contra R-continuous. Let G be regular open in Y. Then A = Y/G is regular closed in Y. By Lemma 2.4(1), f # (f 1 (G)) = Y/f(f 1 (A)). Since f is almost contra R-continuous and since A is regular closed in Y, f(f 1 (A)) is open in Y. Hence f # (f 1 (A)) is closed in Y. Conversely assume that f # (f 1 (G)) is closed in Y for every regular open subset G of Y. Let A be regular closed in Y. By Lemma 2.4(2), f(f 1 (A)) = Y/f # (f 1 (G)) where G = Y/A. By our assumption, f # (f 1 (G)) is closed and hence f(f 1 (A)) is open in Y. Therefore f is almost contra R-continuous. Theorem 5.8. The function f : X Y is almost contra S-continuous if and only if f # (f 1 (A)) is open in Y for every regular closed subset A of Y. Proof. Suppose f is almost contra S-continuous. Let A be regular closed in Y. Then G = Y/A is regular open in Y. By Lemma 2.3(1), f # (f 1 (A)) = X/f(f 1 (G)). Since f is almost contra S-continuous and since G is regular open in Y, f(f 1 (G)) is closed in Y. Hence f # (f 1 (A)) is open in Y. Conversely assume that f # (f 1 (A)) is open in Y for every regular closed subset A of Y. Let G be regular open in Y. By Lemma 2.3(2), f(f 1 (G)) = X/f # f 1 (A) where A = Y/G. By our assumption, f # (f 1 (A)) is open in Y and hence f(f 1 (G)) is closed in Y. Therefore f is almost contra S-continuous. References [1] Dontchev J., Contra Continuous functions and strongly S-closed spaces, International J.Math.and Math. Sci., 19(2)(1996), 303-310. [2] Navpreet Singh Noorie and Rajni Bala., Some characterizations of Open, Closed and Continuous Mappings, International J.Math. and Math. Sci., Article ID 527106, (2008), 1-5. [3] Selvi R, Thangavelu P., ρ-continuity between a topological space and a non empty set where ρ {L,M,R,S}, International Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 9(1-2)(2010), 97-104. [4] Thangavelu P, Selvi R., On Characterizations of almost ρ-continuity where ρ L, M, R, S, International Journal of Applied Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 7(1)(2012), 153-159. [5] Thangavelu P, Selvi R., On almost ρ-continuity where ρ {L,M,R,S}, Pacific-Asian Journal of Mathematics, 6(1)(2012), 27-37.

826