MANAGING FOR RESULTS: An Implementation Plan for the City of Portland

Similar documents
Spheria Australian Smaller Companies Fund

XML Publisher Balance Sheet Vision Operations (USA) Feb-02

Review of Registered Charites Compliance Rates with Annual Reporting Requirements 2016

Housing Operations. Housing Division Re-Organization. Rent Supplement Deficit 2016 Audit Results 2018 Operating Budget(s) Next Steps

T R A N S F O R M AT I O N A L I N I T I AT I V E S U P D AT E B O A R D O F S U P E R V I S O R S M E E T I N G J U N E 7,

Karen E. Rushing Clerk of the Circuit Court and County Comptroller S a r a s o t a C o u n t y, F l o r i d a

PHOENIX ENERGY MARKETING CONSULTANTS INC. HISTORICAL NATURAL GAS & CRUDE OIL PRICES UPDATED TO July, 2018

Department of Public Welfare (DPW)

Financial & Business Highlights For the Year Ended June 30, 2017

Big Walnut Local School District

ONTARIO-MICHIGAN BORDER TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP Planning/Need and Feasibility Study. 1. Work Accomplished This Period (4 Weeks)

Common stock prices 1. New York Stock Exchange indexes (Dec. 31,1965=50)2. Transportation. Utility 3. Finance

MARITIME AFFAIRS & FISHERIES. EMFF Strategic Programming

1.2 The purpose of the Finance Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities related to:

London Borough of Barnet Pension Fund. Communication Strategy (2018)

OTHER DEPOSITS FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DEPOSIT BARKAT SAVING ACCOUNT

Executive Summary. July 17, 2015

CSR for BC & OT and GBS

Performance Report October 2018

Opinions on technical and scientific matters concerning mutual recognition: working procedure for the Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

After the Rate Increase, What Then?

Business & Financial Services December 2017

Budget Manager Meeting. February 20, 2018

Investit Software Inc. INVESTOR PRO CANADA 20 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT EXAMPLE

Sacramento City College

Dashboards Tools May 14 & 15, 2013 NonProfit Learning Center Discussion Leader: Kay Sohl

Resource Allocation, Management, and Planning Steering Committee #7

Big Walnut Local School District

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, MARCH 21 AT 4 PM

Office of the City Auditor. Audit Report. AUDIT OF COMCAST CABLE FRANCHISE FEES 2002 THROUGH 2005 (Report No. A07-010) April 27, 2007.

THURGOOD MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL LYNN, MA

WESTWOOD LUTHERAN CHURCH Summary Financial Statement YEAR TO DATE - February 28, Over(Under) Budget WECC Fund Actual Budget

MEDICAID FEDERAL SHARE OF MATCHING FUNDS

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

Historical Pricing PJM COMED, Around the Clock. Cal '15 Cal '16 Cal '17 Cal '18 Cal '19 Cal '20 Cal '21 Cal '22

Alpha Broker MA- FX: Detailed Performance Report

PRESS RELEASE. Securities issued by Hungarian residents and breakdown by holding sectors. January 2019

Cost Estimation of a Manufacturing Company

Springs Coast Steering Committee Proposed FY2020 Springs Funding Application Timeline and Process. July 11, 2018

Integrated Planning and Budgeting

Mitchell Electric Charitable Fund PO Box 409 Camilla, GA (229) or FAX:

Business Cycle Index July 2010

Work Program Integration Initiative (WPII)

Town of Cary. Capital Budgeting. What We ll Talk About Today. Where Are You From? Authority School System Municipality County Other

Historical Pricing PJM PSEG, Around the Clock. Cal '15 Cal '16 Cal '17 Cal '18 Cal '19 Cal '20 Cal '21 Cal '22

ACA Reporting E-File Errors, Penalties & Exchange Notices

Algo Trading System RTM

Foundations of Investing

CONTENTS COMMENTARY CHARTS TABLES GLOSSARY. Section 1: Headline Inflation Section 2: Core Inflation

QUARTERLY REPORT AND CERTIFICATION OF THE COUNTY TREASURER For Quarter Ending June 30, 2009 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION

Consumer Price Index (Base year 2014) Consumer Price Index

City of St. Augustine. Vision

Consumer Price Index (Base year 2014) Consumer Price Index

For financial adviser use only. Not to be used with retail clients. Guide to Backtesting

Project Connect. July 11, 2012

Factor Leave Accruals. Accruing Vacation and Sick Leave

Traffic Municipal Manager Traffic

FREDERICK 2O3O A 1O-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE CITY OF FREDERICK

U.S. Natural Gas Storage Charts

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE FINANCE AND AUDIT COMMITTEE

PRESS RELEASE. Securities issued by Hungarian residents and breakdown by holding sectors. October 2018

Fiscal Year 2018 Project 1 Annual Budget

Review of Membership Developments

Distribution Group Study Process. August 26, 2014

HUD NSP-1 Reporting Apr 2010 Grantee Report - New Mexico State Program

Consumer Price Index (Base year 2014) Consumer Price Index

Orange Unified School District

INTEGRATING ASSESSMENT, PLANNING & BUDGETING. Presentation to URPC August 26, 2016 Lisa Castellino, PhD Office of Institutional Effectiveness

Alameda Health System

The Financial Reporting Checklists Every Firm should be Doing

Economic Activity Index ( GDB-EAI ) For the month of May 2013 G O V E R N M E N T D E V E L O P M E N T B A N K F O R P U E R T O R I C O

Billing and Collection Agent Report For period ending April 30, To NANC

Using projections to manage your programs

Namibia Consumer Price Index

Status of the Unemployment Trust Fund and Related Issues. Commission on Unemployment Compensation. Ellen Marie Hess, Commissioner.

FY18 Budget & Planning Process. February 10 & 16, 2017

HIPIOWA - IOWA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION Unaudited Balance Sheet As of July 31

HIPIOWA - IOWA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION Unaudited Balance Sheet As of January 31

Asset Manager Performance Comparison

Project Connect. June 22, 2011

Financing Overview & 2017 GO Bond Capacity Update. Department of Finance April 2017

PRESS RELEASE. Securities issued by Hungarian residents and breakdown by holding sectors. October 2017

Asset Manager Performance Comparison

Singapore Exchange Limited Building Tomorrow s Market, Today

QUESTION 2. QUESTION 3 Which one of the following is most indicative of a flexible short-term financial policy?

City of El Segundo Office of the City Treasurer

BRAC 2005 Issues. Briefing to the Infrastructure Steering Group. June 27, 2003

Budget Model Redesign Initiative

Ohlone Community College District

CARTAC Technical Assistance Reports

2030 PLAN UPDATE Steering Committee Meeting #1 Project Management June 7, 2018

Title: COST CONTRACT CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE AND EMERGENT WORK REPORT. Number: DI-FNCL Approval Date:

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at December 2017 compared to December 2016.

Cherry Hill Board of Education

Durham Orange Joint Staff Working Group Meeting Agenda October 10, :30 pm 4:00 pm Durham City Hall, Transportation 4B

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at March 2017 compared to March 2016.

STRUCTURED INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE UPDATE 3 Years Bonus Enhanced Structured Equity Linked Investment Series 1

Consumer Price Index, Jobless Claims, Housing Starts Each of These Reports Have Favorable Aspects to Note

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at September 2017 compared to September 2016.

Presentation to CE LHIN Board of Directors

Transcription:

MANAGING FOR RESULTS: An Implementation Plan for the City of Portland Office of Management and Finance City Auditor s Office Bureau of Planning City of Portland, Oregon June, 2003 Managing for Results Plan Report RESULTS Budget Manage

Table of contents Introduction 1 Overview 1 Major milestones.... 3 Implementation timeline. 5 Roles, task descriptions, and timing chart.. 6 Bureau roles in major implementation stages. 10 Resources 11

Introduction In December, 2002 the Auditor s Office, in partnership with the Office of Management and Finance, completed work on a special report that reviewed the status of the City s efforts toward setting goals and objectives, measuring performance, and using that information in decision-making. The report reviewed past and current efforts to determine what changes, if any, need to be made in our methods to plan and manage for results. The report concluded that although the City has a strong foundation upon which to build a comprehensive system that focuses on results, there are many improvements that could be made. The report also concluded that these changes would not require the creation of a new bureaucracy, but could be accomplished by improving our current processes. The report recommended the City adopt an improved performance information system that could be more readily used in the decision-making process. On February 19, 2003, the Council unanimously passed Resolution No. 36123, which accepted the Managing For Results report, and directed the Office of Management and Finance to develop an implementation plan for Managing for Results using the report as a general framework. In the resolution, the Council recognized that Managing for Results would help maximize the quantity and quality of City services, improve the efficiency of City programs and allocation of tax resources, help managers plan and implement programs with City priorities in mind, and improve public accountability and trust in government. This document outlines the action steps we will take to implement the Managing for Results system. Overview The Office of Management and Finance will take the lead role in implementing Managing for Results. Their effort will be closely coordinated with staff from the Bureau of Planning and the City Auditor s Office. In addition, every City bureau will participate by upgrading their performance measures, and by reviewing and giving input on the City s strategic planning effort and the new program-based budget. Perhaps the most important role is played by City Council. City Council must provide the direction and the commitment to undertake this project which will improve our decision-making and public reporting processes.

Several key elements make up the implementation process: Strategic planning This will provide the basis for city goals and objectives. Program-based budget A revised budget format will be developed to closely link program performance and spending. Bureau goals and spending plans will be linked to higher-level City goals and priorities. Improved performance measures Performance measures will be improved to reflect citywide and bureau goals. Measures will be more consistent and will be checked for accuracy by the Auditor s Office. Results will be available annually before the budget process begins. Improved public reporting The SEA and budget document will be improved to show more closely the links between planned City and bureau goals, and their actual performance. We anticipate the implementation phase of Managing for Results to be completed when the first completely program-based budget is published in June of 2005. Along the way, however, there will be many major milestones where improved performance data will be available. When the project is fully implemented, the City Council, bureau managers, and the public will have better and more timely information upon which to base decisions. Data will be available for every program in the City, it will be checked for accuracy, and Bureaus will only have to enter performance data once each year. That data will go into a centralized database of performance information which will be accessible to a variety of users.

MAJOR MILESTONES November 2003 Annual Council Performance Retreat At this retreat the City Council may begin defining citywide goals and strategic direction to be used as part of the Managing for Results effort. The Bureau of Planning will present an update of their strategic planning efforts and a revised mission and vision statement for Council consideration. The Office of Management and Finance will present a status report on redesigning the budget process and document to focus on program spending and performance. The Auditor s Office will present the SEA report in a revised format that more closely fits the MFR model. This also represents an effort to publish the SEA document six weeks earlier than usual in order to provide more timely data for budget decision-making. December 2003 City Council annual development of budget priorities - City Council may develop budget priorities based on financial forecasts, performance trends reported via the strategic planning process, the SEA report, OMF analytical reports and recommendations, and other sources. These priorities will be communicated to the Bureaus during the budget process. June Adopted budget is presented in a revised format to reflect program spending and performance. The budget may only be in a prototype form at this point. November Annual Council Performance retreat At this retreat the City Council may consider progress toward meeting citywide goals and bureau goals which were established during the previous year s work on the MFR project. Bureau of Planning will present the first annual performance report on citywide goals and strategic issues.

The Auditor s Office will present the SEA report. The Office of Management and Finance will present financial information relative to city performance. December City Council annual development of budget priorities - City Council may develop budget priorities based on financial forecasts, performance trends reported via the strategic planning process, the SEA report, OMF analytical reports and recommendations, and other sources. These priorities will be communicated to the Bureaus during the budget process. April Completed Strategic Plan for Council approval. June Adopted program-based budget in new format that closely links performance and spending.

MANAGING FOR RESULTS Implementation Timeline April 17, 2003 ANNUAL Improved PERFORMANCE Budget RETREAT Document 2003-04 -05 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE RETREAT NEW BUDGET DOCUMENT Annual Council Budget Priorities Annual Council Budget Priorities Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar Jun Sep Nov Jan Mar Jun BUREAU OF PLANNING: Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Work Plan Meet with stakeholders bureau directors and public review draft mission and vision Environmental Scan report Revised mission & vision for Council review Strategic Background Info report environmental scan for bureau directors use in proposing strategic options Partial performance report on citywide goals (interim) info on city s performance in meeting citywide goals Strategic Options report for Council review Prepare implementation proposals Meet with stakeholders bureau directors and public review draft Strategic Action Plan New annual performance report on citywide goals Complete recommended Strategic Action Plan for Council approval OMF: Budgeting Publish budget calendar timeline for incorporating program data into the budget process Redesigned budget document test document with financial and performance data focusing on programs Reconstructed budget in IBIS reconstruct budgets and other financial reports at the program level Updated budget manuals (interim) updated versions focusing on programs with interim performance data information Adopted Budget in revised prototype program format organized by program with partial performance data New budget manuals updated versions of all budget development and monitoring manuals and procedures New budget requests with verified program performance data for City Council Adopted Budget with performance data to ensure elected officials, management and citizens understand the cost, efficiency and effectiveness of city programs AUDIT SERVICES: Performance Data Begin bureau training to assist bureaus in upgrading their performance measures and consolidating budget, SEA and bureau measures into one set Framework for SEA report redesign plan for revision to meet the needs of the new Managing for Results system Performance manual completed standardize the concepts and approaches for developing performance measures for all City agencies. Partially revised SEA report (interim) end Implement new data collection & validation procedures City wide performance data collection that is integrated into, and supports, the budget process. In addition, data validation procedures to ensure performance data are reliable and relevant New annual SEA report

Roles, task descriptions and timing chart FY 2003-04 Planning Bureau OMF Auditor s Office July 2003 Strategic Planning Work Plan. The Work Plan will detail steps to complete the entire Strategic Planning process, along with roles, responsibilities, and time frames. Performance Manual. A manual that provides basic guidelines for the development and use of performance measures. It will standardize the concepts and approaches for developing performance measures for all City agencies. It will provide a framework for linking program performance measures to higher level bureau goals and to Citywide goals. It will also be consistent with program budget definitions and requirements. Complete new SEA framework. Redesign to meet the needs of the new Managing for Results system. Will provide performance information to identify key trends in City performance, and keep City managers, City Council, and the public focused on achieving goals. Sept 2003 Oct 2003 Environmental Scan Report. The Environmental Scan will examine regional and even national concerns that affect strategic issues, such as population growth, the economy, and mandates from other governments. Meet with stakeholders/public to review the draft mission statement and organizational vision. (Will use documents previously approved by the Council in 2002.) Review should be limited in scope, and will be done with assistance of ONI staff. Based on input, Mission and Vision would be revised for adoption by Council. Budget calendar. A time line and calendar that incorporates recording and reporting of program data into the budget process. The reporting will provide context for Mayor and Council review and discussion of bureau financial forecasts, CIP plans and budget development. Bureau training. Assist bureaus in upgrading their performance measures as well as their goals and objectives. Will use the framework for performance measurement adopted in the Performance Manual. We anticipate meeting with senior bureau managers and with those who will be performance measurement contacts in each bureau (these will not necessarily be the budget contacts). One-on-one help will be emphasized. Follow-up meetings may concentrate on integrating the performance measures seamlessly into the budget process. Continues through June,.

Roles, task descriptions and timing chart (cont.) Planning Bureau OMF Auditor s Office Nov 2003 Prepare and present interim Performance report to Council. Report consists of 2 elements: info on defining citywide goals and strategic direction, plus annual SEA report (Auditor). Intended to be first of annual meetings to discuss Citywide performance. At presentation, identify additional analyses of interest to Council. The Council will discuss the implications of the performance report. The additional staff analysis would be completed to be available for the Council Budget Priorities discussion in December. The Bureau will present a revised City mission statement and vision for Council review. Redesigned budget document. Will entail producing a test document prior to final implementation with financial and performance data focussing on programs. Updated budget manuals. Changes in data reporting and program budgeting will be incorporated into updated versions of all budget development and monitoring manuals and procedures. May not contain final procedures for performance data entry. These will be developed in coordination with the Auditor s Office. Interim SEA. Partially redesigned. Dec 2003 Reconstructed budget in IBIS. Bureaus not currently presenting financial info by program will need to reconstruct budgets and other financial reports at the program level. Most bureaus already do, and BFP has worked with bureaus to produce Program Survey report for Council. Jan

Roles, task descriptions and timing chart (cont.) FY -05 Planning Bureau OMF Auditor s Office Mar Prepare Strategic Background information report. The info will mainly be derived from the Planning Bureau scan and strategic plan documents done for the individual bureau strategic plans or other similar plans. The Bureau Directors will be the primary audience for this report. June Prepare Strategic Options report: Based on the Background report and the direction of the Bureau Directors group, prepare a report on strategic options for consideration by the council. Adopted budget in revised prototype program format. Redesign of budget process & products to ensure information on performance is incorporated into a program performance perspective. May only have partial performance data at this point. July Strategic Options report: Review the Strategic Options with the Council Aug Implement new data collection & validation procedures. Citywide performance data collection that is integrated into, and supports, the budget process. In addition, data validation procedures to ensure performance data are reliable and relevant (working within the resources available).

Roles, task descriptions and timing chart (cont.) Planning Bureau OMF Auditor s Office Oct Prepare implementation proposals. For the Council selected strategic directions, prepare a range of implementation actions. This work task will require major assistance from the individual bureau staffs as well as staff from OMF for financial implications. Depending on the strategic direction selected by Council, the assistance of other agencies in the region may also be needed. An initial draft of the actions would be reviewed by the Bureau Directors. Following their direction, a report for stakeholder/public review would be prepared. Nov Stakeholder review of Implementation proposals. The stakeholder evaluation will be conducted with the assistance of ONI. New budget manual. Final version of all procedures needed to produce a budget that incorporates both financial and performance data by program. New annual SEA report. New annual performance report on citywide goals. First annual report on newly adopted City goals. Will include review of SEA report. Feb 2005 New budget request format containing verified program performance data for City Council. Apr 2005 Complete Recommended Strategic Action Plan for Council Approval: Based on this evaluation, prepare a recommended package of strategic direction. July 2005 New adopted budget with complete performance data and program format.

BUREAU ROLES IN MAJOR IMPLEMENTATION STAGES Strategic Planning * Review and comment on City mission statement * Develop, review, or revise Bureau mission * Help Council develop citywide goals and strategic issues Improved Performance Measures * Receive training from Auditor s Office * Upgrade Bureau performance measures * Develop/revise performance data collection methods if needed Move to Program based budget * Update program financial structure if needed * Give input on new budget format and budget instructions * Receive training on new budget procedures On-going management * provide services to meet goals/objectives * monitor performance and track results * Collect and maintain performance data

RESOURCES Office of Management and Finance: OMF will complete assigned tasks using existing staff from FPD and the CAO's office. Major tasks include updates to process maps, manuals and redesign of the budget document. FPD will assist with the development of bureau performance measures and will be responsible for compiling all data into a citywide database. Bureau of Planning: The Bureau of Planning will complete the assigned Strategic Plan with a combination of existing staff and a limited term additional staff position. The primary work associated with the Environmental Scan will be completed by existing staff as part of the Bureau's on-going work plan. The work related to the Mission statement and organizational vision, coordination with individual bureau strategic plans, the informational meetings with stakeholders and the preparation of the Strategic Options for consideration by the Directors and the Council will be completed by the limited term position. Auditor s Office: The Auditor s Office will complete assigned implementation tasks with existing staff. The major tasks include developing a performance measurement manual, redesigning the SEA report, helping bureaus upgrade their performance measures, and developing a new data collection and verification system. Future year review and verification of performance data will require additional resources. The amount of data verification that can be accomplished will depend directly upon the level of additional resources provided.