LAMPIRAN. A. Data. PAD (juta) INVESTASI (%) PDRB (juta) Kulon Progo. Bantul. Gunung Kidul. Sleman

Similar documents
LAMPIRAN 1. Retribusi (ribu Rp)

Hasil Common Effect Model

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Wilayah Tahun PAD JOW PDRB JH JR Yogyakarta

LAMPIRAN PERHITUNGAN EVIEWS

LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN. A. Perhitungan Return On Asset

UJI COMMON EFFECT MODEL

Lampiran 1 Lampiran 1 Data Keuangan Bank konvensional

LAMPIRAN. Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob.

Lampiran I Data. PDRB (Juta Rupiah) PMA (Juta Rupiah) PMDN (Juta Rupiah) Tahun. Luas Sawit (ha)

Lampiran 1. Tabulasi Data

Appendixes Appendix 1 Data of Dependent Variables and Independent Variables Period

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Lampiran 1 : Grafik Data HIV Asli

Export and Import Regressions on 2009Q1 preliminary release data Menzie Chinn, 23 June 2009 ( )

DATA VARIABEL PENELITIAN

LAMPIRAN. Tahun Bulan NPF (Milyar Rupiah)

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Kabupaten Langkat Suku Bunga Kredit. PDRB harga berlaku

Lampiran 1. Data PDB, Pengeluaran Pemerintah, jumlah uang beredar, pajak, dan tingkat suku bunga

Lampiran 1 Daftar Perusahaan Manufaktur

Economics 442 Macroeconomic Policy (Spring 2015) 3/23/2015. Instructor: Prof. Menzie Chinn UW Madison

DATA PENELITIAN. Pendapatan Nasional (PDB Perkapita atas Dasar Harga Berlaku) Produksi Bawang Merah Indonesia MB X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6

Appendix. Table A.1 (Part A) The Author(s) 2015 G. Chakrabarti and C. Sen, Green Investing, SpringerBriefs in Finance, DOI /

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 2. 2) graphs. 3) unit root tests

Donald Trump's Random Walk Up Wall Street

LAMPIRAN. Universitas Sumatera Utara

Notes on the Treasury Yield Curve Forecasts. October Kara Naccarelli

BEcon Program, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University Page 1/7

Supplementary Materials for

esia/perkembangan/

Openness and Inflation

THE IMPACT OF BANKING RISKS ON THE CAPITAL OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN LIBYA

Appendices. Appendix 1 Buy ranges for each portfolio

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 1. 2) descriptive statistics and correlogram. Series: LGCSI Sample 12/31/ /11/2009 Observations 2596

LAMPIRAN. Null Hypothesis: LO has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 1 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=13)

LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN. = Pengeluaran Konsumsi Masyarakat (milyar rupiah) = Jumlah Uang Beredar (milyar rupiah) = Laju Inflasi (dalam persentase)

9. Assessing the impact of the credit guarantee fund for SMEs in the field of agriculture - The case of Hungary

Study Bubble Price in Housing Market (Case Study: State Bushehr)

Monetary Economics Portfolios Risk and Returns Diversification and Risk Factors Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I

Santi Chaisrisawatsuk 16 November 2017 Thimpu, Bhutan

Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven growth: A panel econometrics approach

The Relationship Between Internet Marketing, Search Volume, and Product Sales. Honors Research Thesis

Impact of Ownership Structure on Earnings Management: Evidence from Pakistani Banking Sector

The 7 Smart Collaboration for Business in Technology and Information Industries 2016

Financial Econometrics: Problem Set # 3 Solutions

Anexos. Pruebas de estacionariedad. Null Hypothesis: TES has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=9)

ACCOUNTING MANIPULATIONS AND FIRMS FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM NIGERIA

Chapter-3. Sectoral Composition of Economic Growth and its Major Trends in India

POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ECONOMETRICS. Mr.

FIN 533. Autocorrelations of CPI Inflation

23571 Introductory Econometrics Assignment B (Spring 2017)

Muhammad Nasir SHARIF 1 Kashif HAMID 2 Muhammad Usman KHURRAM 3 Muhammad ZULFIQAR 4 1

Influence of Macroeconomic Indicators on Mutual Funds Market in India

Methods for A Time Series Approach to Estimating Excess Mortality Rates in Puerto Rico, Post Maria 1 Menzie Chinn 2 August 10, 2018 Procedure:

Impact of Working Capital Management on Profitability: A Case of the Pakistan Textile Industry

Back from the Dead: the GFC and the Resurrection of Long Term Unemployment

Fall 2004 Social Sciences 7418 University of Wisconsin-Madison Problem Set 5 Answers

FBBABLLR1CBQ_US Commercial Banks: Assets - Bank Credit - Loans and Leases - Residential Real Estate (Bil, $, SA)

International Journal of Research and Review E-ISSN: ; P-ISSN:

Financial Risk, Liquidity Risk and their Effect on the Listed Jordanian Islamic Bank's Performance

COTTON: PHYSICAL PRICES BECOMING MORE RESPONSIVE TO FUTURES PRICES0F

THE IMPACT OF OIL REVENUES ON BUDGET DEFICIT IN SELECTED OIL COUNTRIES

Analysis of the Influence of the Annualized Rate of Rentability on the Unit Value of the Net Assets of the Private Administered Pension Fund NN

Factor Affecting Yields for Treasury Bills In Pakistan?

Does the spin-off policy can accelerate the deposit funds in the Indonesian Islamic banking industry?

SUSTAINABILITY PLANNING POLICY COLLECTING THE REVENUES OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATION

Effect of Social Responsibility Costs on Value of Quoted Firms in Nigeria: Sectoral Analysis

Business Survey and Short-Term Projection

An Investigation of Effective Factors on Export in Iran

The Influence of Leverage and Profitability on Earnings Quality: Jordanian Case

ICOI-2018 The 2018 International Conference of Organizational Innovation Volume Aty Herawati and Firly Irradha Fauzia

Employment growth and Unemployment rate reduction: Historical experiences and future labour market outcomes

New York Science Journal 2016;9(11)

Lampiran 1. Kode Perusahaan. No. Universitas Sumatera Utara

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2014, 6(6): Research Article

INFLUENCE OF CONTRIBUTION RATE DYNAMICS ON THE PENSION PILLAR II ON THE

1. A test of the theory is the regression, since no arbitrage implies, Under the null: a = 0, b =1, and the error e or u is unpredictable.

ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE EXPENSES OF SOCIAL PROTECTION AND THE ANTICIPATED OLD AGE PENSION

Investment and financing constraints in Iran

The Effect of Inflation Uncertainty on the Capital Structure of Non-Financial Firms

Sample Copy + 1,9784 X 2 1,2106 X 3. + e 1

Forecasting the Philippine Stock Exchange Index using Time Series Analysis Box-Jenkins

RESEARCH ON INFLUENCING FACTORS OF RURAL CONSUMPTION IN CHINA-TAKE SHANDONG PROVINCE AS AN EXAMPLE.

The Frequency of Wars*

The Role of Banking Development Quality in the FDI-Growth Nexus: Panel Evidence

Quantitative evidence of post-crisis structural macroeconomic changes

Exchange Rate and Economic Performance - A Comparative Study of Developed and Developing Countries

Okun s Law - an empirical test using Brazilian data

Effect of Profitability and Financial Leverage on Capita Structure in Pakistan Textile Firms

FTSE BIRR. ftserussell.com. FTSE Russell 1

1.4 Show the steps necessary to obtain relative PPP in growth rates.

Asian Journal of Empirical Research

MỘT SỐ KHUYẾT TẬT CỦA MÔ HÌNH HỒI QUY

Effect of Macroeconomic Variables on Foreign Direct Investment in Pakistan

THE IMPACT OF INSURANCE ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NIGERIA

CHAPTER 5 MARKET LEVEL INDUSTRY LEVEL AND FIRM LEVEL VOLATILITY

TheEffectAnalysisRiskofCreditLiquidityandCapitalonBankingProfitability

Impact of Direct Taxes on GDP: A Study

9. Appendixes. Page 73 of 95

Transcription:

82 LAMPIRAN A. Data Kabupaten Kulon Progo Bantul Gunung Kidul Sleman Tahun PDRB (juta) PAD (juta) INVESTASI (%) TINGKAT PENGANGGURAN (%) 2007 4.455.556 33.129.460 0 4.34 2008 4.665.308 36.188.575 1.82 3.56 2009 4.850.346 41.937.645 0.01 4.31 2010 4.998.871 44.416.717 78.84 4.18 2011 5.246.147 49.588.455 4.21 3.03 2012 5.475.148 54.293.141 6.08 3.04 2013 5.741.660 64.750.332 6.08 2.85 2014 6.002.787 92.815.160 705.51 2.88 2015 6.281.566 187.802.917 796 3.72 2007 10.509.554 43.027.036 491.7 5.17 2008 11.024.865 48.429.062 491.7 5.06 2009 11.518.166 65.991.514 491.7 5.85 2010 12.090.974 90.238.880 40.11 5.24 2011 12.728.666 106.885.124 98.3 4.39 2012 13.407.022 121.593.862 94.76 3.7 2013 14.138.719 170.006.171 94.73 3.36 2014 14.867.409 265.128.265 871.99 2.57 2015 15.610.514 312.419.914 89 3 2007 7.829.248 22.228.567 76.19 3.93 2008 8.172.653 25.239.545 63.38 3.29 2009 8.516.079 31.950.621 76.94 3.94 2010 8.864.152 39.756.345 99.24 4.04 2011 9.248.011 41.985.405 62.07 2.23 2012 9.695.980 55.600.362 54.37 1.38 2013 10.177.433 66.710.860 54.37 1.69 2014 10.639.466 90.333.149 69.71 1.61 2015 11.151.688 145.856.403 69 2.9 2007 18.759.542 92.185.494 55.89 7.75 2008 19.721.074 97.906.951 66.99 6.83 2009 20.603.760 117.315.381 73.25 7.43 2010 21.528.101 147.072.535 4.21 7.17 2011 22.645.852 203.416.683 125.65 5.36 2012 23.957.113 220.367.231 109.73 5.64 2013 25.367.414 298.406.947 129.7 3.28 2014 26.740.537 383.497.912 133.26 4.21 2015 28.159.674 577.585.009 133 5.37

83 Yogyakarta 2007 12.290.450 100.374.387 70.98 9.65 2008 12.920.226 119.300.781 75.81 7.85 2009 13.495.848 135.106.762 65.6 8.07 2010 14.167.677 178.761.036 16.58 7.41 2011 18.206.090 202.260.820 80.89 6.7 2012 19.189.075 241.190.745 87.15 5.33 2013 20.239.558 304.797.499 111.75 6.45 2014 21.312.144 404.272.608 111.66 6.35 2015 22.412.176 449.849.108 101 5.52 B. Hasil Olah Data E-Views 1. Common effect Method: Pooled Least Squares Date: 04/02/17 Time: 17:15 LOG(PAD?) 0.877669 0.010867 80.76768 0.0000 TI? -0.000490 0.000336-1.455722 0.1529 TP? 0.030011 0.036980 0.811542 0.4216 Dependent Variable: LOG Method: Pooled Least Squ Date: 04/02/17 Time: 17: Total pool (balanced) obse Variable C LOG(PAD?) TI? TP? Fixed Effects (Cross) _KP--C _BANTUL--C _GK--C _SLEMAN--C _YK--C R-squared 0.291895 Mean dependent var 16.29269 Adjusted R-squared 0.258175 S.D. dependent var 0.531115

84 S.E. of regression 0.457446 Akaike info criterion 1.338023 Sum squared resid 8.788771 Schwarz criterion 1.458467 Log likelihood -27.10551 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.382923 Durbin-Watson stat 0.200474 2. Fixed effect Method: Pooled Least Squares Date: 04/02/17 Time: 17:17 C 13.01913 0.442910 29.39455 0.0000 LOG(PAD?) 0.186635 0.022002 8.482507 0.0000 TI? -1.78E-05 4.73E-05-0.376199 0.7089 TP? -0.036250 0.010868-3.335403 0.0019 Fixed Effects (Cross) _KP--C -0.744342 _BANTUL--C 0.048492 _GK--C -0.173648 _SLEMAN--C 0.575630 _YK--C 0.293869 Cross-section fixed (dummy variables) Effects Specification R-squared 0.990640 Mean dependent var 16.29269 Adjusted R-squared 0.988869 S.D. dependent var 0.531115 S.E. of regression 0.056034 Akaike info criterion -2.765890 Sum squared resid 0.116175 Schwarz criterion -2.444706 Log likelihood 70.23253 Hannan-Quinn criter. -2.646156 F-statistic 559.4202 Durbin-Watson stat 0.773237

85 3. Uji Chow Redundant Fixed Effects Tests Pool: PANEL Test cross-section fixed effects Effects Test Statistic d.f. Prob. Cross-section F 298.055186 (4,37) 0.0000 Cross-section Chi-square 157.644801 4 T0.0000 Cross-section fixed effects test equation: Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 04/02/17 Time: 17:18 C 7.507877 1.037545 7.236191 0.0000 LOG(PAD?) 0.461323 0.057996 7.954325 0.0000 TI? -0.000279 0.000228-1.224633 0.2277 TP? 0.065054 0.025272 2.574209 0.0138 R-squared 0.689036 Mean dependent var 16.29269 Adjusted R-squared 0.666283 S.D. dependent var 0.531115 S.E. of regression 0.306816 Akaike info criterion 0.559550 Sum squared resid 3.859577 Schwarz criterion 0.720142 Log likelihood -8.589873 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.619417 F-statistic 30.28275 Durbin-Watson stat 0.161056

86 4. Random effect Method: Pooled EGLS (Cross-section random effects) Date: 04/02/17 Time: 17:19 Swamy and Arora estimator of component variances C 12.67590 0.443155 28.60378 0.0000 LOG(PAD?) 0.203213 0.021405 9.493596 0.0000 TI? -2.88E-05 4.71E-05-0.611584 0.5442 TP? -0.028027 0.010553-2.655847 0.0112 Random Effects (Cross) _KP--C -0.720094 _BANTUL--C 0.052858 _GK--C -0.144980 _SLEMAN--C 0.551355 _YK--C 0.260862 Effects Specification S.D. Rho Cross-section random 0.238782 0.9478 Idiosyncratic random 0.056034 0.0522 Weighted Statistics R-squared 0.838213 Mean dependent var 1.270572 Adjusted R-squared 0.826375 S.D. dependent var 0.154042 S.E. of regression 0.064187 Sum squared resid 0.168918 F-statistic 70.80654 Durbin-Watson stat 0.487345 Unweighted Statistics R-squared 0.319288 Mean dependent var 16.29269 Sum squared resid 8.448769 Durbin-Watson stat 0.009744

87 5. Uji Hausman Correlated Random Effects - Hausman Test Pool: PANEL Test cross-section random effects Test Summary Chi-Sq. Statistic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob. Cross-section random 15.797965 3 0.0012 Cross-section random effects test comparisons: Variable Fixed Random Var(Diff.) Prob. LOG(PAD?) 0.186635 0.203213 0.000026 0.0011 TI? -0.000018-0.000029 0.000000 0.0021 TP? -0.036250-0.028027 0.000007 0.0016 Cross-section random effects test equation: Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 04/02/17 Time: 17:20 C 13.01913 0.442910 29.39455 0.0000 LOG(PAD?) 0.186635 0.022002 8.482507 0.0000 TI? -1.78E-05 4.73E-05-0.376199 0.7089 TP? -0.036250 0.010868-3.335403 0.0019 Cross-section fixed (dummy variables) Effects Specification R-squared 0.990640 Mean dependent var 16.29269 Adjusted R-squared 0.988869 S.D. dependent var 0.531115 S.E. of regression 0.056034 Akaike info criterion -2.765890 Sum squared resid 0.116175 Schwarz criterion -2.444706 Log likelihood 70.23253 Hannan-Quinn criter. -2.646156 F-statistic 559.4202 Durbin-Watson stat 0.773237

88 6. Uji Heteroskedastisitas Dependent Variable: RESID? Method: Pooled Least Squares Date: 04/02/17 Time: 17:26 C 0.057422 0.148380 0.386990 0.7010 LOG(PAD?) -0.000977 0.007371-0.132523 0.8953 TI? 2.68E-05 1.58E-05 1.695697 0.0983 TP? -0.000911 0.003641-0.250125 0.8039 Fixed Effects (Cross) _KP--C -0.017948 _BANTUL--C -0.015874 _GK--C -0.019302 _SLEMAN--C -0.005610 _YK--C 0.058734 Cross-section fixed (dummy variables) Effects Specification R-squared 0.726783 Mean dependent var 0.039002 Adjusted R-squared 0.675094 S.D. dependent var 0.032933 S.E. of regression 0.018772 Akaike info criterion -4.953062 Sum squared resid 0.013039 Schwarz criterion -4.631878 Log likelihood 119.4439 Hannan-Quinn criter. -4.833328 F-statistic 14.06053 Durbin-Watson stat 2.058294 7. Uji Multikolinearitas LOG(PAD) TI TP 0.12832864972 0.27923857362 LOG(PAD) 1 85249 90764 TI 0.12832864972 85249 1-0.13746480027 25714 TP 0.27923857362 90764-0.13746480027 25714 1

89 8. Hasil Koefisiensi LOG(PDRB_KP) = -0.744342497005 + 13.0191272384 + 0.186634527217*LOG(PAD_KP) - 1.77803124834e-05*TI_KP - 0.0362502732884*TP_KP LOG(PDRB_BANTUL) = 0.0484915540086 + 13.0191272384 + 0.186634527217*LOG(PAD_BANTUL) - 1.77803124834e-05*TI_BANTUL - 0.0362502732884*TP_BANTUL LOG(PDRB_GK) = -0.173648389167 + 13.0191272384 + 0.186634527217*LOG(PAD_GK) - 1.77803124834e-05*TI_GK - 0.0362502732884*TP_GK LOG(PDRB_SLEMAN) = 0.575630008269 + 13.0191272384 + 0.186634527217*LOG(PAD_SLEMAN) - 1.77803124834e-05*TI_SLEMAN - 0.0362502732884*TP_SLEMAN LOG(PDRB_YK) = 0.293869323894 + 13.0191272384 + 0.186634527217*LOG(PAD_YK) - 1.77803124834e-05*TI_YK - 0.0362502732884*TP_YK