Section 19: Basin-Wide Mitigation Action Plans

Similar documents
Attachment B. King County Flood Control Zone District Work Program

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE MANUAL

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Review. FEMA Region VI and the State of Texas

King County Flood Control District 2015 Work Program

in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department

Delaware River Basin Commission s Role in Flood Loss Reduction Efforts

Oklahoma High Water Marks. CTP Community of Practice April 20, 2017

Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain management plans and flood forecast inundation maps

BACKGROUND ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT DEVELOPMENT ADOPTION OF THE H-GAC HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN/UPDATES MISSION STATEMENT

Hazard Mitigation & Resiliency

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

Passaic River Basin Flood Advisory Commission Report/Status of Recommendations. October 2014 Update

In 1993, spring came in like a lion, but refused

Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Kankakee County, Illinois Executive Summary

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

Mitigation Action Plan Alamance County

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

Role of Disaster Insurance in Improving Resilience: An Expert Meeting The Resilient America Roundtable

FEMA s Flood Map Modernization Preparing for FY09 and Beyond: Integrated Flood Data Update, Risk Assessment, and Mitigation Planning

Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. Executive Summary

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program

Peer Review Plan. Bastrop Interim Feasibility Study. Lower Colorado River Basin, Texas

Hazard Mitigation Planning

SOUTH CENTRAL REGION MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN. Advisory Committee Meeting September 12, 2012

SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES

COMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF LISBON

Modernization, FEMA is Recognizing the connection between damage reduction and

Repetitive Loss Area Revisit # 6 Walter Road Area Jefferson Parish

Dade County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

The National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System: An Introduction and Discussion of the RDO Role. October 2, :00-3:15 pm ET

New Tools for Mitigation & Outreach. Louie Greenwell Stantec

CHAPTER THREE Natural Hazard Mitigation Strategy

DISASTER MANAGEMENT AND ASSISTANCE

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT: A PRESENT AND A 21st CENTURY IMPERATIVE. Gerald E. Galloway, Jr. United States Military Academy

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Sussex County Kick-off Meeting November 28, 2006

Flood Hazard Risk Mapping:

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

Best Practices. for Incorporating Building Science Guidance into Community Risk MAP Implementation November 2012

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Warren County Planning Workshop (2 nd Meeting) March 7, 2007

SECTION V THE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY BLUEPRINT

Georgia Silver Jackets Team

Justification for Floodplain Regulatory Standards in Illinois

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

State of Vermont FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT WORK PLAN

Wyoming s Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

NFIP Program Basics. KAMM Regional Training

Findings/Debrief Meeting September 9, CDOT R4 Headquarters Big Thompson Conference Room W 10 th St. Greeley, CO 80634

King County Flood Control District Flood Risk Reduction Work Program and Accomplishments

A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICE IN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRALIA

ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (ABFEs)

Enough about me! Topics Covered

Flood Risk Outreach Tools for Georgia Communities. GAFM 10 th Annual Conference Presented By: Jarrett Mattli

Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS) Program

ANNEX B: TOWN OF BLUE RIVER

State of Missouri Five-Year Floodplain Management Plan

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Mercer County Kick-off Meeting December 6, 2006

Volusia County Floodplain Management Plan 2012

State of South Carolina Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

STATE OF MARYLAND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN FIVE-YEAR WORK PLAN DRAFT SEPTEMBER, 2004

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND Department of Environmental Services

David A. Stroud, CFM AMEC Earth & Environmental Raleigh, NC

Task 2: Strengthen the regional capacity and cooperation towards data and knowledge sharing on risks.)

Public Meeting 28 November Presented by: Deepa Srinivasan, Vision Planning and Consulting, LLC Dr. Michael Scott, ESRGC, Salisbury University

Floodplain Management Plan State of Utah

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

Mitigation Strategies

TESTIMONY. Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.

Coordinating CRS Success on a County Scale. Presented at the 41st Annual ASFPM Conference Managing Flood Risk in the Heartland

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

Requirements for Mapping Levees Complying with Section of the NFIP Regulations

APPENDIX D PLANNING PROCESS DOCUMENTATION

Use of FEMA Non regulatory Flood Risk Products in Planning

ROI for Joining CRS. Floodplain Management Association Conference. Sacramento, CA. September 2016

COMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF CENTRAL CITY

City of Ocean City Permit and Application Process Quality Improvement

Why do we care about floodplains?

Lake County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Plan Lake County Hazard Mitigation Committee

LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW FEMA REGION VI AND STATE OF TEXAS

2011 MT Floods Damages and Recovery Options

Flood Mitigation Planning at the Texas Water Development Board. Josh Oyer, CFM December 7, 2016

Vocabulary of Flood Risk Management Terms

Suwannee River Water Management District

HOUSE SPONSORSHIP. Bill Summary

Levees: PL84-99 and the NFIP

History of Floodplain Management in Ascension Parish

All Hazard All Discipline Minutes

Section 2. Introduction and Purpose of the LMS

ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN

Thurston County, WA Flood Hazard Mitigation Plan Annual Progress Report CRS Activity 510

USACE Silver Jackets, the Missouri State Risk Management Team and State Hazard Mitigation

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROJECT (CAP) Federal Interest Determination

United States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Requesters. December 2010 FEMA FLOOD MAPS

Community Resilience & NFIP s Community Rating system

Flooding Part One: BE Informed. Department of Planning & Development

Transcription:

Section 19: Basin-Wide Mitigation Action Plans Contents Introduction...19-1 Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition Mitigation Actions...19-2 Mitigation Actions...19-9 Introduction This Mitigation Plan, A Disaster Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin, identifies specific hazards that could affect the Basin. Sections 19 and 20 of this Plan set forth mitigation action plans to reduce the risks to these eleven hazards. Section 19 includes six mitigation actions to be taken by the Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition and five by the. Section 19 focuses on basin-wide actions, i.e., those that have been or will be taken by, or will affect, all Lower Colorado River Basin communities rather than just a single jurisdiction. Section 20 includes mitigation actions and mitigation action plans of the individual jurisdictions that participate in the Coalition. Some of the actions in Sections 19 and 20 are directed at reducing the risk from a single hazard, such as flooding or fire. Other actions pertain to multiple hazards or all eleven hazards. These eleven hazards differ in important ways, such as in their predictability, length of warning time, speed of onset, magnitude, scope, duration of impact, and the possibilities of secondary impacts. Many of the demands on the emergency management infrastructure they generate, however, arise not from their differences but from their commonalities. The Basin-wide mitigation actions are identified below, in priority order, with the highest priority actions appearing first. They are organized by responsible and presented along with background, the estimated costs and benefits of each action, the responsible for implementing the action, an implementation schedule, and potential sources of funding. Appendix B contains detailed information about grant funds that may be available to support implementation of the mitigation actions. The mitigation objectives to which the actions relate are also identified. An overall priority is assigned to each action based on its affect on overall risk to life and property, ease of implementation, political and community support, and potential funding. Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin Page 19-1

Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition Mitigation Actions ACTION: Improve local floodplain management through adoption of higher regulatory standards. Promote the principles of no adverse impact. Encourage adoption of a no-rise in BFE in the 100-year floodplain. Encourage freeboard requirements for permitting structures in the SFHA. Encourage the inclusion of cumulative damage provisions in local ordinances. Disseminate model ordinances and conduct program assessments. Encourage communities to participate in the Community Rating System, with an objective to have 5 CRS communities by October 2004 and an additional 5 communities by April 2005. Flood The mission of the Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition is to encourage comprehensive, consistent management of the floodplain along the Colorado River. Central to that mission is regional coordination and planning to reduce flood damage. Rapid development both in and out of the mapped floodplains is occurring in many parts of the Colorado River Basin. Most communities do not coordinate floodplain management activities with other communities in the watershed and do not receive information regarding upstream or downstream development activities that may be impacting the floodplain. With this action, the Coalition will work to enhance regional floodplain management and coordinate floodplain management programs by establishing common regional goals, objectives, permit criteria and procedures for development within the Colorado River Basin. These activities will further the goal of No Adverse Impact. No adverse impact floodplain management is where the action of one property owner does not adversely impact the rights of other property owners, as measured by increased flood peaks, flood stage, flood velocity, and erosion and sedimentation. Page 19-2 Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin

This mitigation action involves development of a Guidance Manual containing recommended criteria, policies and procedures; provision of training; provision of technical assistance; and conduct of assessments of local floodplain management programs; and issuance of model ordinances and permitting criteria. This action will help promote the principles of No Adverse impact. It will strengthen floodplain management programs in the Basin, and enable communities to receive information regarding upstream or downstream development activities that may change the floodplain. It will help provide technical resources to local jurisdictions and help raise community awareness of the potential changes to the existing floodplain from new development in the basin. It will also increase the number of jurisdictions that are in the Community Rating System program, thereby reducing flood insurance premiums for their residents. High The budget for support of TCRFC administration and programs in FY 2004 is $304,000. Future costs are to be determined. The Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition, with technical support provided by the. This action will begin in September 2003 and continue, ongoing, through September 2008. Floodplain assessments will be conducted annually. The objectives are to have 5 CRS communities by October 2004 and an additional 5 communities by April 2005. General revenues and grants 3.3, 5.3 ACTION: Provide training for elected officials and professional technical staff (including emergency management coordinators) on floodplain management and emergency management issues. All hazards Many elected officials and city and county staff that must deal with floodplain management or emergency management issues do not receive adequate training or have access to comprehensive technical resources. With this action, the Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition will provide enhanced training programs for floodplain administrators, emergency management coordinators, and elected officials. The training program will be developed in partnership with Federal and state agencies Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin Page 19-3

and professional s. It will involve short courses, training seminars, workshops, conferences, on-call speakers, videos, websites and other educational resources directed at educating elected officials, the regulatory community, and the public about floodplain management and emergency management issues. The Coalition will work to support the Certified Floodplain Manager program administered by the Texas Floodplain Management Association and the Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.; the certified Emergency Manager program administered by the International Association of Emergency Managers; and the Texas Emergency Manager certification program administered by the Emergency Management Association of Texas. This action will result in increased understanding by local officials of the need for a strong, effective floodplain management program. It will give them a basic understanding of the causes of flooding, permitting criteria, mitigation measures, and the consequences of granting variances. This training will also help ensure that local officials are familiar with their roles and responsibilities during emergency events and with the methods of obtaining assistance from state and federal agencies. It will also build confidence in floodplain administrators that are certified. High The budget for support of TCRFC administration and programs in FY 2004 is $304,000. Future costs are to be determined. The Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition, with technical support provided by the. This action will begin in September 2003 and continue, ongoing, through September 2009. General revenues and grants 1.3, 4.1, 4.2 Page 19-4 Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin

ACTION: Facilitate inter-jurisdictional and basin-wide federal flood-mapping studies to improve understanding of flood risk. Develop and maintain a Map Master Plan. Set priorities for flood mapping needs in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Complete the production of Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps for additional basin communities. Flood The Flood Insurance Rate Maps of most communities in the Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition are older than fifteen years; they no longer accurately represent flooding and development patterns. Some communities have no Flood Insurance Rate Maps at all. Development in the Lower Colorado River Basin is occurring rapidly. From 1990 to 2000, the population increased by more than 40 percent in five basin counties. The overwhelming majority of Coalition members identified new and revised floodplain maps as their highest priority for improving floodplain management. This action involves developing and maintaining a Map Master Plan, setting basin-wide mapping priorities, and producing digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps for more basin communities. The Map Master Plan will document each community s mapping needs and assign them a relative priority in the context of the region as a whole. It will provide a schedule for producing and implementing the plan and will address how to keep maps up to. The development of a Map Master Plan will result in more accurate floodplain maps that can be upd easily. It will produce maps in phases according to a mutually agreed-upon schedule. Establishing priorities for mapping needs in the Lower Colorado River Basin will help to ensure that limited mapping funds are applied to areas of highest need. Producing maps in digital format will enable communities to readily access and up their maps. This action will also build on the investments made in flood insurance studies and complete the production of Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps and delivery of new maps to basin communities. High Costs for map production vary from $4.7 million to $16.8 million depending upon complexity and detail of map. The Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition, with technical support provided by the. Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin Page 19-5

This action started in March 2001 with funding under FEMA s Best Practices Mapping Program. Mapping will proceed as additional funding becomes available through 2009. Mapping the Colorado River Basin will proceed as funding becomes available from FEMA s Map Modernization Program, the Lower Colorado River Authority, and local funding sources. 1.1, 1.3, 3.1, 3.3, 5.3, 6.1, 6.4 ACTION: (1) Facilitate inter-jurisdictional review of basin-wide Federal flood studies to identify projects to achieve flood damage reduction. (2) Assist in obtaining public input on the U.S. Corps of Engineers Lower Colorado River Basin Study and analyze the potential impact of each floodreduction alternative on local jurisdictions. Page 19-6 Flood The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is conducting a Lower Colorado River Basin Study in three phases. Phase 1, completed July 2002, identified: existing conditions regarding flood damages to residential, commercial, industrial and public structures; environmental conditions and opportunities for enhancement of natural ecosystems; and recreational needs within the basin. The Phase 1 study area is the main stem of the Colorado River. Phase 2 will involve conduct of interim feasibility studies focusing on known flood problem areas. Under Phase 3, the Corps will develop and evaluate alternatives for implementing solutions to water resource-related problems. A number of alternatives for reducing the risk or magnitude of flood damages will be evaluated. The Corps of Engineers will then examine the consequence of each alternative, including the economic and environmental costs and benefits, and work with the LCRA and communities in the basin, through the Coalition, to decide on the most effective and practical course of action. The Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition will work with individual jurisdictions in conducting public outreach on the study results and analyze the impact of each flood reduction alternative on local jurisdictions. This action will increase public awareness and improve understanding of the U.S. Corps of Engineers Lower Colorado River Basin study. It will also provide Coalition communities a forum in which to analyze each flood-reduction alternative. Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin

Medium $1.6 million is required in 2004 for the Corps to continue the multi-year study. Additional funding will be required in 2005. The Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition, with technical support provided by the and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Specific flood reduction alternatives will be completed by 2005. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1.1, 1.3, 3.3, 4.1, 6.1 ACTION: Conduct community education and outreach on flood insurance and floodplain management issues. Educate the community on the dangers of low-water crossings. Promote flood insurance by launching a Cover the Basin campaign. Flood The most effective floodplain-management programs are based on public education and understanding of the causes of flooding and ways to mitigate damage to life and property. A comprehensive, concerted community education and outreach campaign is needed to give the citizens of the basin the knowledge and tools necessary to mitigate damage before disaster strikes, better prepare for disaster, and know what to do in an emergency situation. Outreach will include a Cover the Basin campaign to educate citizens in high-risk areas regarding the need for and benefits of flood insurance. An educated citizenry is the best protection against disaster. This community education and outreach effort will help protect basin residents in the event of disaster. It will also help garner support for floodplain management activities. Increasing flood insurance coverage provides the best financial protection in the event of a flood disaster. Homeowner or business property insurance policies do not cover flood damages. Flood insurance enables property owners to recover quickly and more fully from a flooding event. Reliance on Federal disaster assistance leaves many without financial protection for events that are not Federally-declared disasters. Often, Federal disaster assistance is in the form of long term loans that must be repaid. This reliance on Federal disaster assistance is in contrast to flood Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin Page 19-7

insurance, for which claims are paid quickly and fully. Medium The budget for support of TCRFC administration and programs in FY 2004 is $304,000. Future costs are to be determined. The Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition, with technical support provided by the. This on-going activity will start in 2004 and end in 2009. Coalition dues, LCRA funding, and FEMA grants 1.1. 1.2. 1.3, 3.1, 6.3 ACTION: Assist TCRFC communities in achieving designation by the National Weather Service as Storm Ready communities. Establish 24-hour warning reception points. Improve monitoring of hydrometeorological data. Enhance the ability to inform communities and special authorities about weather warnings. Increase public education about severe weather threats and appropriate responses. Page 19-8 Weather-related hazards (flooding, winter storms, hurricanes, tornadoes, thunderstorms, hail, severe winter storms) By designating them as Storm Ready, the National Weather Service recognizes local communities that have demonstrated a strong commitment to putting the infrastructure and systems in place that will save lives and protect property in the event of a severe weather event. To, the City of Lakeway and the City of Brownwood are designated as Storm Ready. Six criteria are used to determine if a city or county is Storm Ready: 24- hour Warning Reception Point and Emergency Operations Center; ability for these centers to receive National Weather Service warnings; ability to monitor hydrometeorological data; ability to inform the community and special authorities about weather warnings; public education about severe weather threats and appropriate responses; and formal hazards and risk assessment planning. Storm Ready communities are better prepared and will help serve their citizens when help is needed the most. include more timely and effective weather warnings and detailed recommendations to facilitate hazardous weather operations for local authorities. A Storm Ready designation can lead to reduced insurance rates for communities Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin

participating in the National Flood Insurance Program. Medium The budget for support of TCRFC administration and programs in FY 2004 is $304,000. Future costs are to be determined. The Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition, with technical support provided by the. This ongoing activity will start in 2003 and end in 2008. General revenues and grants 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 4.1 Mitigation Actions ACTION: Undertake a dam safety program. Improve inspection and maintenance of all dams to ensure that they can withstand the maximum probable flood event. Review and up dam-failure emergency action plans annually. Improve dam-failure modeling capability. Dam failure, flooding The LCRA continues to make improvements to all of the dams in the Highland Lakes region. Mansfield Dam is able to withstand the probable maximum flood (PMF) without further reinforcement. This fact means that even in the event of failures of either Buchanan, Inks, Wirtz, or Starcke dams, Mansfield Dam would hold their floodwaters and Lake Travis would not overtop Mansfield Dam. The Dam Modernization Program began in 1995 and is expected to continue through FY 2004 to strengthen the six Highland Lakes dams and ensure their safety for years to come. The dams have performed virtually trouble free for decades. However, natural wear over the years and more stringent design and construction standards have created a need to up Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin Page 19-9

and improve the dams. Stricter state and federal dam safety regulations were adopted in the 1970s and 1980s as a direct response to numerous dam failures across the country. These standards require that dams be able to withstand the most severe flood imaginable, the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF). This flood is so severe and statistically remote that its probability of occurrence in any given year cannot be measured. The Dam Modernization program will ensure that LCRA s dams meet required design safety standards to resist the water load and pressure of the PMF. In addition to capital improvements, this action improving LCRA s dam failure modeling capabilities, review and up of dam failure emergency action plans, and continuing inspection and maintenance of all dams to ensure that they can withstand the PMF. Undertaking capital improvements and maintenance and inspection activities will help ensure that the Highland Lakes dams can withstand a PMF, and thus save lives and property. Improving LCRA s dam-failure modeling capability will help improve understanding of risk of dam failure and the timeliness of modeling. High $50 million The capital improvement component of the Dam Modernization Program was started in 1994 and will be completed in 2004. Inspection and maintenance activities will be ongoing between 2004 and 2009. 2.1, 2.3, 2.4 Page 19-10 Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin

ACTION: Maintain and expand hydrometeorological monitoring system. Identify sites where stream gages need to be added or upgraded and coordinate installation requests with U.S.G.S. Expand the volunteer rainfall observer program. Flood Information on the flow of the Colorado River and rainfall amounts throughout the basin are vital to safeguarding lives and property and ensuring adequate water resources. LCRA, with the assistance of the United States Geological Survey, operates a network of stream gages that provide real-time and long-term historical flow of information. Such information is used for flood forecasting and mapping flood-prone areas; planning and managing water supplies; developing water quality standards and monitoring changes in flow; and designing structures. LCRA has a Rainfall Observer Program. This action seeks to expand the program by adding additional observers to obtain a more comprehensive picture of rainfall amounts. Stream-flow gage and rainfall observer data provide continual, up-to- information about water conditions and understanding of hydrologic phenomena. It assists in flood forecasting and monitoring river basin outflows in real time. It provides river managers with accurate information quickly and easily. This information is needed to improve estimates of risk and impact for better hazard response and mitigation. High $4.4 million June 2008 General revenues and external grants 1.1, 2.2 Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin Page 19-11

ACTION: Continue to support the Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition. All The serves as the Administrative Agency for the Texas Colorado River Floodplain Coalition. The administrative services and functions it provides are specified in an Interlocal Agreement. Its activities include providing logistical support for meetings; acting as a central clearinghouse for technical information, models, studies, training and educational opportunities; identifying funding options and preparing and submitting grant applications on behalf of the Coalition; maintaining a web page and internet address for the Coalition; maintaining a computer database of floodplain application and permitting information; arranging for an independent assessment of each member s floodplain management program; and contracting with a qualified engineering consultant to perform, at the request of a coalition member, technical reviews of development permit applications. The motto of the Coalition is, Working Together Makes Sense. The cooperative arrangement between LCRA and the Coalition is mutually beneficial. It provides for cooperative floodplain management, a mechanism for sharing ideas and programs, and a mechanism to assist local governments. High The budget for support of TCRFC administration and programs in FY 2004 is $304,000. Future costs are to be determined. This ongoing activity will start in 2003 and end in 2008. 4.1 ACTION: Support local jurisdictions in the LCRA service area in obtaining funds for local and regional mitigation and preparedness activities. Page 19-12 All A major challenge faced by communities seeking comprehensive hazard mitigation planning solutions is securing funds in an era of constrained resources at all levels of government. A wide range of financial and technical assistance is available from the State of Texas and the Federal Government to protect communities from floods and other natural and Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin

man-made disasters and preserve the quality of water in the Lower Colorado River and its tributaries. Appendix B of this Plan contains a Guide to Funding and Technical Assistance Programs That Support Mitigation. This Guide is a tool to use in leveraging State and Federal resources to protect residents of the basin from the ravages of natural and man-caused disasters and enhance water quality. To assist in leveraging resources, this Guide will be upd annually as changes are made in funding programs or as new funding programs become available. This action will result in increased resources for local and regional hazard mitigation and emergency-preparedness activities. Medium The budget for support of TCRFC administration and programs in FY 2004 is $304,000. Future costs are to be determined. The Funding Guide will be upd annually, starting in 2004. The Lower Colorado River Authority will work with the Coalition members to continually leverage external resources, starting in 2004 and ending in 2009. and over 40 Federal and State grant programs. 4.1, 4.3, 6.1 ACTION: Strengthen the cooperative technical partnership with FEMA, the Department of Homeland Security. Improve local-federal understanding and cooperation with regard to disaster damage-reduction activities. Reduce length of time for accomplishing tasks such as flood mapping. All The is a Cooperating Technical Partner of the Federal Emergency Management Agency in the conduct of floodplain-mapping activities. Under the auspices of the CTP program, LCRA and FEMA have partnered to complete an assessment of mapping needs and deficiencies in the basin; complete a pilot project for the City of Lago Vista to produce digital FIRMs; develop a Map Master Plan which sets priorities for the production of new maps; and produce new maps for the region. This action will continue and strengthen the cooperative Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin Page 19-13

technical partnership with FEMA. The Cooperating Technical Partnership arrangement with the Federal Emergency Management Agency helps leverage external resources to accomplish flood mapping for the basin. Medium $6,000, exclusive of any grants obtained. This is an on-going activity that will be conducted from 2003 to 2008. Federal Emergency Management Agency Map Modernization Funds,, local funding. 1.1, 2.2, 4.1, 6.1 and 6.4 Page 19-14 Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin

Creating a Disaster-Resistant Lower Colorado River Basin Page 19-15