The Frequency of Wars*

Similar documents
Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 2. 2) graphs. 3) unit root tests

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 1. 2) descriptive statistics and correlogram. Series: LGCSI Sample 12/31/ /11/2009 Observations 2596

Economics 442 Macroeconomic Policy (Spring 2015) 3/23/2015. Instructor: Prof. Menzie Chinn UW Madison

Appendixes Appendix 1 Data of Dependent Variables and Independent Variables Period

POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ECONOMETRICS. Mr.

SUSTAINABILITY PLANNING POLICY COLLECTING THE REVENUES OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATION

Export and Import Regressions on 2009Q1 preliminary release data Menzie Chinn, 23 June 2009 ( )

LAMPIRAN. Null Hypothesis: LO has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 1 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=13)

ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE EXPENSES OF SOCIAL PROTECTION AND THE ANTICIPATED OLD AGE PENSION

Kabupaten Langkat Suku Bunga Kredit. PDRB harga berlaku

Assist. Prof. Dr. Nuray İslatince 1

TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS OF AN EFFICIENT MARKET IN TERMS OF INFORMATION THE CASE OF THE CAPITAL MARKET IN ROMANIA DURING RECESSION

Hasil Common Effect Model

LAMPIRAN. Tahun Bulan NPF (Milyar Rupiah)

Notes on the Treasury Yield Curve Forecasts. October Kara Naccarelli

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Anexos. Pruebas de estacionariedad. Null Hypothesis: TES has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=9)

Forecasting the Philippine Stock Exchange Index using Time Series Analysis Box-Jenkins

9. Appendixes. Page 73 of 95

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I

Empirical Analysis of Private Investments: The Case of Pakistan

LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN. = Pengeluaran Konsumsi Masyarakat (milyar rupiah) = Jumlah Uang Beredar (milyar rupiah) = Laju Inflasi (dalam persentase)

Donald Trump's Random Walk Up Wall Street

BEcon Program, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University Page 1/7

LAMPIRAN PERHITUNGAN EVIEWS

Interactions between United States (VIX) and United Kingdom (VFTSE) Market Volatility: A Time Series Study

Estimating Egypt s Potential Output: A Production Function Approach

Appendix. Table A.1 (Part A) The Author(s) 2015 G. Chakrabarti and C. Sen, Green Investing, SpringerBriefs in Finance, DOI /

Openness and Inflation

CHAPTER 5 MARKET LEVEL INDUSTRY LEVEL AND FIRM LEVEL VOLATILITY

Fall 2004 Social Sciences 7418 University of Wisconsin-Madison Problem Set 5 Answers

Lampiran 1 : Grafik Data HIV Asli

The Relationship Between Internet Marketing, Search Volume, and Product Sales. Honors Research Thesis

Econometric Models for the Analysis of Financial Portfolios

An empirical study on the dynamic relationship between crude oil prices and Nigeria stock market

An Examination of Seasonality in Indian Stock Markets With Reference to NSE

The Economic Consequences of Dollar Appreciation for US Manufacturing Investment: A Time-Series Analysis

The Influence of Leverage and Profitability on Earnings Quality: Jordanian Case

Methods for A Time Series Approach to Estimating Excess Mortality Rates in Puerto Rico, Post Maria 1 Menzie Chinn 2 August 10, 2018 Procedure:

Supplementary Materials for

ملحق رقم (1) بیانات الدراسة :

ملحق رقم( 1 ): الا نحدار للدالة اللوغریثمیة للناتج المحلي الا جمالي

Does it influence? Macro variables on stock returns.

Santi Chaisrisawatsuk 16 November 2017 Thimpu, Bhutan

An Investigation of Effective Factors on Export in Iran

esia/perkembangan/

Employment growth and Unemployment rate reduction: Historical experiences and future labour market outcomes

COTTON: PHYSICAL PRICES BECOMING MORE RESPONSIVE TO FUTURES PRICES0F

Financial Econometrics: Problem Set # 3 Solutions

FBBABLLR1CBQ_US Commercial Banks: Assets - Bank Credit - Loans and Leases - Residential Real Estate (Bil, $, SA)

Exchange Rate and Economic Performance - A Comparative Study of Developed and Developing Countries

LAMPIRAN 1. Retribusi (ribu Rp)

Monetary Economics Portfolios Risk and Returns Diversification and Risk Factors Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015

Foreign and Public Investment and Economic Growth: The Case of Romania

Analysis of the Influence of the Annualized Rate of Rentability on the Unit Value of the Net Assets of the Private Administered Pension Fund NN

Factor Affecting Yields for Treasury Bills In Pakistan?

Trade Misinvoicing and Macroeconomic Outcomes in India

FIN 533. Autocorrelations of CPI Inflation

AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC DEBT RELEVANCE TO THE ECONOMIC GROWTH OF THE USA

الملحق رقم (1): یوضح متغیرات النموذج.

Relative Effectiveness of Fiscal and Monetary Policies in Nigeria

Lampiran I Data. PDRB (Juta Rupiah) PMA (Juta Rupiah) PMDN (Juta Rupiah) Tahun. Luas Sawit (ha)

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

A case study of Cointegration relationship between Tax Revenue and Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Sri Lanka

Influence of Macroeconomic Indicators on Mutual Funds Market in India

Nexus between stock exchange index and exchange rates

IMPACT OF FOREIGN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENT FLOWS

Financial Risk, Liquidity Risk and their Effect on the Listed Jordanian Islamic Bank's Performance

UJI COMMON EFFECT MODEL

Ateyah Alawneh 1. Correspondence: Ateyah Alawneh, College of Business, Tafila Technical University, Jordan.

An Analysis of Stock Returns and Exchange Rates: Evidence from IT Industry in India

An Empirical Research on the Relationship Between Non-Interest Income Business and Operation Performance of Commercial Banks

ijcrb.webs.com INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AUGUST 2012 VOL 4, NO 4

Impact of Direct Taxes on GDP: A Study

Per Capita Housing Starts: Forecasting and the Effects of Interest Rate

Effect of Macroeconomic Variables on Foreign Direct Investment in Pakistan

Determinants of Merchandise Export Performance in Sri Lanka

Monetary Policy and Economic Stability in Nigeria: An Empirical Analysis

THE IMPACT OF BANKING RISKS ON THE CAPITAL OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN LIBYA

THE IMPACT OF OIL REVENUES ON BUDGET DEFICIT IN SELECTED OIL COUNTRIES

On the Importance of Labour Productivity Growth: Portugal vs. Ireland

Chapter-3. Sectoral Composition of Economic Growth and its Major Trends in India

23571 Introductory Econometrics Assignment B (Spring 2017)

Trading Volume and Fama-French Three Factor Model on Excess Return. Empirical Evidence from Nairobi Security Exchange

Okun s Law - an empirical test using Brazilian data

IMPACT OF MACROECONOMIC VARIABLE ON STOCK MARKET RETURN AND ITS VOLATILITY

CHAPTER V RELATION BETWEEN FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH DURING PRE AND POST LIBERALISATION PERIOD

BYLAAG: E-VIEWS RESULTATE VAN DIE MODEL VAN VOORRAADINVESTERING IN SUID-AFRIKA

Bilateral Swap Agreements and U.S. Balance of Trade

DATA PENELITIAN. Pendapatan Nasional (PDB Perkapita atas Dasar Harga Berlaku) Produksi Bawang Merah Indonesia MB X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6

Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven growth: A panel econometrics approach

Lampiran 1 Lampiran 1 Data Keuangan Bank konvensional

THE CAUSALITY BETWEEN REVENUES AND EXPENDITURE OF THE FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS OF PAKISTAN

LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN. A. Perhitungan Return On Asset

The Impacts of Financial Crisis on Pakistan Economy: An Empirical Approach

Relationship between Oil Price, Exchange Rates and Stock Market: An Empirical study of Indian stock market

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANNEL OF MONETARY POLICY TRANSMISSION MECHANISM IN SRI LANKA

An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Inflation in Nigeria

Test of Random Walk Behavior in Karachi Stock Exchange

Interest Rates in India: Information Content of Inflation

Transcription:

The Frequency of Wars* Mark Harrison** Department of Economics and CAGE, University of Warwick Centre for Russian and East European Studies, University of Birmingham Hoover Institution, Stanford University Nikolaus Wolf*** Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Humboldt-Universität Centre for Economic Policy Research Abstract Wars are increasingly frequent, and the trend has been steadily upward since 1870. The main tradition of Western political and philosophical thought suggests that extensive economic globalization and democratization over this period should have reduced appetites for war far below their current level. This view is clearly incomplete: at best, confounding factors are at work. Here, we explore the capacity to wage war. Most fundamentally, the growing number of sovereign states has been closely associated with the spread of democracy and increasing commercial openness, as well as the number of bilateral conflicts. Trade and democracy are traditionally thought of as goods, both in themselves, and because they reduce the willingness to go to war, conditional on the national capacity to do so. But the same factors may also have been increasing the capacity for war, and so its frequency. Keywords: wars, state capacity, democracy, trade. JEL codes: H56, N40. * Earlier versions of this paper were presented to the annual Defense Economics conference held at the Institute for Defense Analyses of the U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC, on November 17, 2008, the University of Birmingham Centre for Russian and East European Studies current affairs seminar, February 25, 2009, and the German Historical Institute conference on War in Transnational and Long Run Perspective, Moscow, July 2, 2010. We thank Alex Apostolides, Stephen Broadberry, Nick Crafts, Jari Eloranta, Bishnupriya Gupta, James Harrison, Les Hannah, Alex Klein, Bas van Leeuwen, Anandi Mani, Philippe Martin, Sharun Mukand, Dennis Novy, Eugenio Proto, Jeremy P. Smith, and the editor and referees, for advice and comments. ** Mail: Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom. Email: mark.harrison@warwick.ac.uk. *** Mail: Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Humboldt-Universität, Spandauer Str. 1, 10178 Berlin, Germany. Email: nikolaus.wolf@wiwi.hu-berlin.de. First draft: December 1, 2008. This version: March 10, 2011.

Table A1. Time series data, 1870 to 2001 The Frequency of Wars: Appendix Pairwise conflicts Democracy measures Number of countries Total Excluding United States Polity 2 Executive constraint Political competition Foreign trade openness Variable # of FW FW no US Democracy Exconst Polcomp Openness name countries 1870 47 4 2-2.32 3.43 4.58 0.11 1871 46 5 5-2.05 3.62 4.75 0.16 1872 43 5 5-1.65 3.63 4.98 0.18 1873 43 4 3-1.65 3.53 5.02 0.17 1874 43 2 2-1.56 3.62 5.00 0.18 1875 43 4 3-1.46 3.64 5.00 0.16 1876 44 8 7-1.60 3.72 4.76 0.18 1877 44 4 4-1.63 3.73 4.69 0.19 1878 46 8 7-1.65 3.73 4.73 0.20 1879 46 2 2-1.53 3.71 4.78 0.21 1880 46 4 3-1.15 3.72 5.00 0.20 1881 46 4 4-1.13 3.75 4.98 0.21 1882 45 4 4-1.13 3.75 4.98 0.20 1883 44 3 3-1.06 3.74 5.12 0.20 1884 44 4 4-1.15 3.74 5.12 0.20 1885 44 8 6-1.15 3.74 5.12 0.20 1886 44 6 6-1.34 3.66 5.02 0.19 1887 45 6 6-1.34 3.66 5.02 0.19 1888 45 5 3-1.21 3.68 5.08 0.19 1889 45 3 1-1.13 3.70 5.08 0.20 1890 45 4 4-0.96 3.72 5.35 0.16 1891 45 6 5-1.00 3.75 5.37 0.20 1892 45 1 1-0.98 3.77 5.37 0.20 1893 46 5 4-0.96 3.77 5.46 0.19 1894 46 3 3-0.89 3.85 5.38 0.20 1895 46 7 6-0.91 3.85 5.29 0.18 1896 46 6 6-1.00 3.81 5.29 0.21 1897 46 5 5-1.00 3.81 5.29 0.21 1898 46 10 9-0.66 3.85 5.51 0.21 1899 46 4 4-0.66 3.85 5.51 0.20 1900 46 8 6-0.68 3.89 5.42 0.16 1901 46 5 5-0.48 3.96 5.48 0.19 1902 47 8 6-0.40 3.94 5.51 0.19 1903 48 6 3-0.44 3.91 5.55 0.19 1904 48 6 4-0.53 3.81 5.62 0.19 1905 49 7 5-0.47 3.87 5.71 0.20 1906 48 5 4-0.20 3.87 5.87 0.20 1907 47 6 6-0.51 3.77 5.76 0.20 1908 48 9 8-0.07 3.94 5.96 0.20 1909 49 9 8-0.02 4.00 5.90 0.19 1910 49 9 8 0.21 4.02 5.87 0.19 1911 49 19 16 0.50 4.14 5.96 0.20 1912 48 12 11 0.56 4.14 5.96 0.21 1913 48 13 12 0.93 4.27 6.08 0.18 1914 47 27 23 0.63 4.12 5.90 0.17 1915 47 16 15 0.68 4.22 5.96 0.19 1916 46 15 11 0.78 4.28 5.96 0.22 1917 46 18 14 1.28 4.42 6.24 0.23 1918 54 32 27 1.54 4.50 5.98 0.20 1919 53 23 21 1.63 4.53 6.06 0.19 1920 59 20 17 1.80 4.55 6.00 0.18 1921 60 18 16 2.05 4.63 6.20 0.13

2 Pairwise conflicts Democracy measures Number of countries Total Excluding United States Polity 2 Executive constraint Political competition Foreign trade openness Variable # of FW FW no US Democracy Exconst Polcomp Openness name countries 1922 62 11 11 1.88 4.67 6.24 0.14 1923 62 11 11 1.56 4.57 6.12 0.15 1924 62 2 2 1.15 4.41 6.02 0.15 1925 63 6 6 0.94 4.30 5.85 0.16 1926 63 8 7 0.79 4.25 5.87 0.15 1927 64 9 8 0.69 4.23 5.92 0.15 1928 64 6 6 0.43 4.05 5.72 0.15 1929 64 4 3 0.18 3.98 5.65 0.14 1930 64 3 3 0.00 3.87 5.59 0.12 1931 64 6 6-0.16 3.91 5.45 0.10 1932 65 7 6-0.13 3.91 5.46 0.08 1933 65 8 7-0.50 3.75 5.23 0.08 1934 67 14 13-1.01 3.56 4.94 0.10 1935 67 11 11-1.00 3.54 4.99 0.10 1936 67 11 11-1.56 3.32 4.72 0.10 1937 66 15 15-1.10 3.45 4.95 0.12 1938 66 13 13-0.96 3.46 5.02 0.10 1939 65 37 37-1.15 3.32 5.06 0.11 1940 61 67 66-2.17 3.03 4.55 0.10 1941 54 33 29-1.74 3.15 4.60 0.09 1942 52 31 31-1.82 3.11 4.59 0.09 1943 52 18 18-1.66 3.15 4.60 0.09 1944 55 14 14-0.86 3.44 5.22 0.09 1945 62 19 18-0.09 3.67 5.56 0.09 1946 65 9 7 0.09 3.97 5.74 0.12 1947 67 5 5-0.16 3.82 5.68 0.15 1948 72 9 8-0.11 3.88 5.46... 1949 74 24 23-0.38 3.87 5.24 0.13 1950 74 21 19-0.14 3.94 5.28 0.13 1951 75 18 16-0.28 3.91 5.31 0.17 1952 75 21 20-0.14 4.01 5.26 0.15 1953 77 23 19-0.22 4.01 5.19 0.14 1954 81 25 21-0.45 4.01 5.03 0.14 1955 83 31 30-0.39 3.95 5.00 0.16 1956 86 29 24-0.06 4.01 5.12 0.16 1957 88 17 14 0.05 4.06 5.05 0.16 1958 89 38 33-0.45 3.81 4.85 0.13 1959 88 41 39-0.26 3.87 4.90 0.13 1960 106 33 29-0.74 3.77 4.49 0.14 1961 110 38 31-0.87 3.75 4.44 0.14 1962 117 37 30-0.85 3.81 4.42 0.14 1963 119 36 34-1.17 3.65 4.32 0.14 1964 122 34 29-1.21 3.68 4.30 0.15 1965 125 41 37-1.26 3.63 4.18 0.15 1966 129 35 34-1.35 3.54 4.23 0.15 1967 130 33 28-1.64 3.42 4.14 0.15 1968 134 23 20-1.48 3.42 4.20 0.16 1969 134 34 30-1.78 3.31 4.08 0.17 1970 136 17 15-1.77 3.35 4.10 0.18 1971 142 27 25-2.20 3.25 3.85 0.18 1972 142 20 18-2.55 3.17 3.66 0.18 1973 143 28 25-2.49 3.23 3.70 0.21 1974 145 26 25-2.38 3.24 3.75 0.27 1975 152 35 31-2.37 3.26 3.67 0.26 1976 152 35 31-2.62 3.20 3.56 0.27 1977 153 37 35-2.65 3.18 3.54 0.27 1978 155 33 31-2.19 3.34 3.74 0.27

3 Pairwise conflicts Democracy measures Number of countries Total Excluding United States Polity 2 Executive constraint Political competition Foreign trade openness Variable # of FW FW no US Democracy Exconst Polcomp Openness name countries 1979 159 35 29-1.75 3.47 3.94 0.30 1980 160 33 31-1.94 3.38 3.85 0.32 1981 162 34 28-1.95 3.38 3.86 0.33 1982 162 39 34-1.83 3.44 3.89 0.31 1983 163 40 28-1.63 3.51 3.98 0.29 1984 164 46 42-1.70 3.47 4.02 0.27 1985 164 47 43-1.45 3.52 4.16 0.27 1986 166 46 42-1.33 3.57 4.20 0.25 1987 166 72 68-1.31 3.60 4.24 0.26 1988 166 46 41-1.03 3.67 4.36 0.27 1989 166 23 21-0.56 3.76 4.64 0.31 1990 169 13 11 0.55 4.13 5.19 0.32 1991 182 21 17 1.24 4.38 5.72 0.31 1992 183 24 22 1.92 4.52 5.97 0.31 1993 187 35 30 2.13 4.56 6.11 0.30 1994 186 42 36 2.42 4.64 6.25 0.32 1995 187 43 41 2.39 4.60 6.25 0.34 1996 187 44 41 2.28 4.58 6.24 0.35 1997 187 44 41 2.26 4.54 6.26 0.37 1998 187 28 23 2.42 4.60 6.43 0.36 1999 187 43 39 2.65 4.63 6.59 0.37 2000 187 32 25 2.89 4.70 6.66 0.41 2001 187 43 39 3.09 4.75 6.76 0.40 Sources. FW: The Militarized Inter-State Disputes dataset, version 3.1, at http://www.correlatesofwar.org, described by Ghosn, Palmer, and Bremer, The MID3 data set. Disputes are coded from level (1 no action) through 2 (threat of force), 3 (display of force), 4 (use of force), and 5 (war). We use all disputes of level 3 (the closing of a border or the dispatch of ships or troops) and above. Openness and # of countries: Martin, Mayer, and Thoenig, Make trade not war. Democracy: the Polity2 (or net democracy), Exconst (executive constraint), and Polcomp (political competition) variables from the Polity IV dataset at http://www.systemicpeace.org, described by Marshall and Jaggers, Political regime characteristics.

4 Table A2. Unit root tests on FW (the frequency of pairwise conflicts) Null Hypothesis: FW has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Bandwidth: 3 (Newey-West automatic) using Bartlett kernel Adj. t-stat Prob.* Phillips-Perron test statistic -2.915191 0.0463 Test critical values: 1% level -3.481217 5% level -2.883753 10% level -2.578694 *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values. Residual variance (no correction) 65.63298 HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) 54.22658 Phillips-Perron Test Equation Dependent Variable: D(FW) Method: Least Squares Date: 01/17/11 Time: 09:05 Sample (adjusted): 1872 2001 Included observations: 130 after adjustments Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob. FW_NEW(-1) -0.152393 0.047833-3.185957 0.0018 C 3.267484 1.176782 2.776626 0.0063 R-squared 0.073473 Mean dependent var 0.292308 Adjusted R-squared 0.066235 S.D. dependent var 8.449069 S.E. of regression 8.164465 Akaike info criterion 7.052725 Sum squared resid 8532.287 Schwarz criterion 7.096840 Log likelihood -456.4271 Hannan-Quinn criter. 7.070650 F-statistic 10.15032 Durbin-Watson stat 2.230413 Prob(F-statistic) 0.001813

5 Table A2 (continued). Null Hypothesis: FW has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=12) t-statistic Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -3.185957 0.0231 Test critical values: 1% level -3.481217 5% level -2.883753 10% level -2.578694 *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values. Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation Dependent Variable: D(FW) Method: Least Squares Date: 01/17/11 Time: 09:08 Sample (adjusted): 1872 2001 Included observations: 130 after adjustments Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob. FW(-1) -0.152393 0.047833-3.185957 0.0018 C 3.267484 1.176782 2.776626 0.0063 R-squared 0.073473 Mean dependent var 0.292308 Adjusted R-squared 0.066235 S.D. dependent var 8.449069 S.E. of regression 8.164465 Akaike info criterion 7.052725 Sum squared resid 8532.287 Schwarz criterion 7.096840 Log likelihood -456.4271 Hannan-Quinn criter. 7.070650 F-statistic 10.15032 Durbin-Watson stat 2.230413 Prob(F-statistic) 0.001813 Sources. As Table A-1.

6 Table A3. The trend in FW (pairwise conflict frequency), 1871-2001 Dep. Var. = FW Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.8796 R Square 0.7737 Adjusted R Square 0.7702 Standard Error 0.4444 Observations 131 df SS MS F Regression 2 86.45 43.23 218.9 Residual 128 25.28 0.1975 Total 130 111.7 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 0.6187 0.1233 5.017 1.71E-06 AR(1) 0.5344 0.0747 7.150 5.91E-11 time 0.009387 0.001827 5.139 1.01E-06 Note. Time is annual with t = 0 in 1871. Sources. As Table A-1.

7 Table A4. The trend in FW no US (pairwise conflict frequency, excluding those involving the United States), 1871-2001 Dep. Var. = FW no US Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.8782 R Square 0.7714 Adjusted R Square 0.7678 Standard Error 0.4547 Observations 131 df SS MS F Regression 2 89.310 44.65 215.9 Residual 128 26.47 0.2068 Total 130 115.8 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 0.5552 0.1152 4.820 4E-06 AR(1) 0.5419 0.07404 7.319 2.44E-11 time 0.009245 0.001855 4.983 1.99E-06 Note. Time is annual with t = 0 in 1871. Sources. As Table A-1.

8 Table A5. The trend in average percentile rank of countries originating conflicts, 1871-2001, by GDP Dep. Var. = GDP%R Regression Statistics Multiple R 7.969E-03 R Square 6.351E-05 Adjusted R Square -2.523E-04 Standard Error 0.2779 Observations 3168 df SS MS F Regression 1 0.01553 0.01553 0.2011 Residual 3166 244.5 0.0772 Total 3167 244.5 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 0.6699 0.01480 45.26 0 time 7.039E-05 1.570E-04 0.4484 0.6539 Note. Time is annual with t = 0 in 1870. Sources. As Table 1; see the text.

9 Table A6. The trend in average percentile rank of countries originating conflicts, 1871-2001, by GDP per head Dep. Var. = GDPC%R Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.03353 R Square 0.00112 Adjusted R Square 8.085E-04 Standard Error 0.2889 Observations 3168 df SS MS F Regression 1 0.2973 0.2973 3.563 Residual 3166 264.2 0.08344 Total 3167 264.5 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 0.4868 0.01539 31.64 3.7E-191 t 3.080E-04 1.632E-04 1.887 0.05919 Note. Time is annual with t = 0 in 1870. Sources. As Table 1; see the text.

10 References Ghosn, F., G. Palmer, and S. Bremer, The MID3 data set, 1993 2001: procedures, coding rules, and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 21 (2004), pp. 133-154. Marshall, M. G., and K. Jaggers, Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2006, Center for Systemic Peace, Polity IV Project at http://www.systemicpeace.org (2007). Martin, P., T. Mayer, and M. Thoenig, Make trade not war? Review of Economic Studies 75:3 (2008), pp. 865-900.