OLAH DATA INSTRUMEN PENELITIAN DENGAN SPSS VERSI 16.0

Similar documents
GGraph. Males Only. Premium. Experience. GGraph. Gender. 1 0: R 2 Linear = : R 2 Linear = Page 1

LAMPIRAN 1: OUTPUT SPSS

LAMPIRAN IV PENGUJIAN HIPOTESIS

Lampiran 1 Data Efektivits BPHTB

Sales Sales

Copyrighted 2007 FINANCIAL VARIABLES EFFECT ON THE U.S. GROSS PRIVATE DOMESTIC INVESTMENT (GPDI)

HASIL PENELITIAN BERUPA OUTPUT SPSS

Effect of Change Management Practices on the Performance of Road Construction Projects in Rwanda A Case Study of Horizon Construction Company Limited

Lampiran 1. No. Emiten Simbol

Valid Missing Total. N Percent N Percent N Percent , ,0% 0,0% 2 100,0% 1, ,0% 0,0% 2 100,0% 2, ,0% 0,0% 5 100,0%

Multiple regression analysis of performance indicators in the ceramic industry

Revista Economică 67:Supplement (2015)

MEMORANDUM. TO: Me FROM: Me RE: Memo containing output for SPSS practice exam #2

Relative PE. Aswath Damodaran. Aswath Damodaran 1

INFLUENCE OF CAPITAL BUDGETING TECHNIQUESON THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF COMPANIES LISTED AT THE RWANDA STOCK EXCHANGE

CHAPTER 4 DATA ANALYSIS Data Hypothesis

Lampiran 1. Tabulasi Data

Tabel Penentuan Sampel Penelitian

A Study on the Impact of CSR on Financial Performance of Companies in India

A Survey of the Relationship between Earnings Management and the Cost of Capital in Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange

iskills & Proficiency Profile (PP) Report

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RETIREMENT WEALTH AND HOUSEHOLDERS PERSONAL FINANCIAL AND INVESTMENT BEHAVIOR

LAMPIRAN. TAHUN TANGGAL Return Pasar

Data screening, transformations: MRC05

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

SPSS Reliability Example

The study on the financial leverage effect of GD Power Corp. based on. financing structure

The Effects of Financial Constraints and Export Trade on Innovation

LAMPIRAN 1. adalah 26,7 %. Jumlah energi 1 gr Lemak = 9 Kkal. Perhitungan asam lemak trans 5 % = 26,7 % X 84,425 gr X 9 Kkal/gr = 202,86

LAMPIRAN PERHITUNGAN EVIEWS

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I

Impact of Terrorism on Foreign Direct Investment in Pakistan

2SLS HATCO SPSS, STATA and SHAZAM. Example by Eddie Oczkowski. August 2001

Lampiran 1 Lampiran 1 Data Keuangan Bank konvensional

EFFECT OF WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ON THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF MANUFACTURING FIRMS IN SULTANATE OF OMAN

DATA ANALYSIS. ratio as a measurement of bank s growth. (further details can bee seen in appendix A) 1. Permata Bank (BNLI) Central Asia Bank (BCA)

Ac. J. Acco. Eco. Res. Vol. 3, Issue 2, , 2014 ISSN:

Relationship between intangible assets and financial performance of listed telecommunication firms in China, based on empirical analysis

The effect of earnings smoothness on manufacturing company s performance

Impact of Unemployment and GDP on Inflation: Imperial study of Pakistan s Economy

IMPACT OF BANK SIZE ON PROFITABILITY: EVIDANCE FROM PAKISTAN

EduInspire-An International E-Journal An International Peer Reviewed and Referred Journal Council for Teacher Education

Corporate Governance and Investment Decision of Small Business Firms: Special reference to India

Determinants of Capital Structure in Nigeria

A. K. POKHRIYAL Assistant Professor, Faculty of Commerce, H.N.B. Garhwal Central University, Srinagar Garhwal, Uttrakhand, India

Demonstrate Approval of Loans by a Bank

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH AND KNOWLEDGE

The Impact of Corporate Leverage on Profitability: A Study of Select Manufacture Industry in India

NON-PERFORMING ASSETS IS A THREAT TO INDIA BANKING SECTOR - A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PRIORITY AND NON-PRIORITY SECTOR

The Effects of Liquidity Management on Firm Profitability: Evidence from Sri Lankan Listed Companies

Monetary Economics Risk and Return, Part 2. Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015

Financial Variables Impact on Common Stock Systematic Risk

Statistical Models of Stocks and Bonds. Zachary D Easterling: Department of Economics. The University of Akron

SFSU FIN822 Project 1

Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance of Indian Commercial Banks An Analysis

Monetary Economics Measuring Asset Returns. Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015

Human Journals Research Article January 2018 Vol.:8, Issue:3 All rights are reserved by Joanna L Saragih

The SAS System 11:03 Monday, November 11,

LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN. A. Perhitungan Return On Asset

CHAPTER - 5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIVIDEND POLICY

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (IJM)

THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT

THE EFFECT OF FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKET RETURNS ON STOCK MARKET PERFORMANCE IN SRI LANKA

CHAPTER III FINANCIAL INCLUSION INITIATIVES OF COMMERCIAL BANKS

The impact of the capital structure and financial performance: A study of the listed companies traded in Colombo stock exchange

The Determinants of Cash Companies in Indonesia Muhammad Atha Umry a. Yossi Diantimala b

Financial Crisis in Stock Exchanges-An Empirical Analysis of the Factors that can affect the Movement of Stock Market Index

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2013, 5(12): Research Article

Kabupaten Langkat Suku Bunga Kredit. PDRB harga berlaku

Descriptive Analysis

Liberalization or Protection: Indian Experience in Application of Trade Remedies

The Influence of Inflation towards Unemployment in Indonesia

Revista Economică 70:1 (2018) EFFECTS OF THE MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES ON THE INCREASE OF LABOR PRODUCTIVITY OF LOCAL COMPANIES IN ROMANIA

Theme: Economics & Finance

PE Ratios. Aswath Damodaran. Aswath Damodaran 1

One Way ANOVA with Tukey Post hoc. Case Processing Summary

LAMPIRAN. Tahun Bulan NPF (Milyar Rupiah)

The Influence of Size, Return on Equity, and Leverage on the disclosure of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Manufacturing Companies

Factors Affecting the Payout Policies of Companies Listed on the Jordanian Stock Exchange Market

FOREIGN INVESTMENT AND EXPORT PERFORMANCE OF INDIAN TEXTILE AND CLOTHING INDUSTRY IN POST QUOTA REGIME

Firm Performance And Risk In Real Estate Industry : Relationship Between Corporate Governance

CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND ITS IMPACT ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF INDIAN STEEL INDUSTRY

Impact of Market Share on Profitability of Heavy Vehicles Manufacturers-A Case Study of Hino Pak Ltd

Effect of Budgeting on Public Sector Wage Bill Management by the Government of Kenya

FIN822 project 3 (Due on December 15. Accept printout submission or submission )

International Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Science (IJHASS), Volume: 3 Issue: 2 Month Year: February 2018

THE EFFECT OF NPL, CAR, LDR, OER AND NIM TO BANKING RETURN ON ASSET

Mohammed Zaineldeen Istanbul Commerce University, Turkey

Test of Capital Market Efficiency Theory in the Nigerian Capital Market

DETERMINANTS OF RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE PRICES IN TURKEY

Study 2: data analysis. Example analysis using R

ANALYSIS OFFINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO BMTC, BANGALORE

Contents. An Overview of Statistical Applications CHAPTER 1. Contents (ix) Preface... (vii)

DETERMINANTS OF FINANCIAL STRUCTURE OF GREEK COMPANIES

Relationship between Financial Planning and Financial Performance of Nandi County Government, Kenya

LINEAR PROGRAMMING AND BUSINESS DECISION MAKING AMONG QUOTED FIRMS IN NIGERIA

The Effect of Health Insurance on Death Rates

ImpactofFirmsEarningsandEconomicValueAddedontheMarketShareValueAnEmpiricalStudyontheIslamicBanksinBanglades

Deferred Taxes in Trade

Transcription:

OLAH DATA INSTRUMEN PENELITIAN DENGAN SPSS VERSI 16.0 DESKRIPTIF Variabel Customer Relationship Marketing Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Sum Mean Std. Deviation Skewness Kurtosis Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic Std. Error TRUST 100 2 5 452 4.52.594-1.110.241 1.810.478 COMMIT 100 1 5 465 4.65.657-2.754.241 10.716.478 COMMU 100 1 5 471 4.71.671-3.266.241 12.921.478 CONFLICT 100 1 5 449 4.49.718-2.390.241 9.359.478 CRM 100 1.75 5.00 459.25 4.5925.48023-4.923.241 25.301.478 Valid N (listwise) 100 Variabel Nilai Nasabah Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Sum Mean Std. Deviation Skewness Kurtosis Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic Std. Error EMOT 100 2 5 449 4.49.595 -.991.241 1.583.478 SOCIAL 100 1 5 447 4.47.674-1.913.241 6.983.478 QUALITY 100 1 5 461 4.61.695-2.617.241 9.261.478 PRICE 100 1 5 451 4.51.759-2.442.241 8.383.478 CV 100 1.50 5.00 452.00 4.5200.48550-4.928.241 25.931.478 Valid N (listwise) 100 Variabel Kualitas Layanan Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Sum Mean Std. Deviation Skewness Kurtosis Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic Std. Error TANG 100 2 5 444 4.44.656-1.415.241 3.445.478 EMP 100 3 5 467 4.67.533-1.334.241.848.478 REA 100 1 5 465 4.65.687-2.847.241 10.463.478 RESPON 100 1 5 458 4.58.699-2.465.241 8.534.478 ASSURE 100 1 5 447 4.47.688-1.881.241 6.364.478 SQ 100 2.00 5.00 456.20 4.5620.47028-4.590.241 22.702.478 Valid N (listwise) 100

Variabel Kepuasan Nasabah Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Sum Mean Std. Deviation Skewness Kurtosis Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic Std. Error WOM 100 2 5 426 4.26.543 -.293.241 1.881.478 HOPE 100 1 5 454 4.54.702-2.286.241 7.758.478 EXPERIENCE 100 2 5 460 4.60.620-1.820.241 4.465.478 COMMUN 100 1 5 456 4.56.770-2.579.241 8.572.478 CS 100 2.00 5.00 449.00 4.4900.48058-4.251.241 20.203.478 Valid N (listwise) 100 Variabel Loyalitas Nasabah Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Sum Mean Std. Deviation Skewness Kurtosis Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic Std. Error COG 100 2 5 437 4.37.661 -.789.241.514.478 AFFECT 100 1 5 460 4.60.725-2.469.241 7.706.478 CON 100 1 5 464 4.64.759-2.963.241 10.450.478 ACT 100 1 5 453 4.53.758-2.232.241 6.302.478 CL 100 1.75 5.00 453.50 4.5350.56745-3.567.241 13.683.478 Valid N (listwise) 100 FREKUENSI Variabel Customer Relationship Marketing Statistics TRUST COMMIT COMMU CONFLICT CRM N Valid 100 100 100 100 100 Missing 0 0 0 0 0 Mean 4.52 4.65 4.71 4.49 4.5925 Median 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.7500 Sum 452 465 471 449 459.25 TRUST Valid 2 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 3 2 2.0 2.0 3.0 4 41 41.0 41.0 44.0 5 56 56.0 56.0 100.0

COMMIT 2 1 1.0 1.0 2.0 3 1 1.0 1.0 3.0 4 26 26.0 26.0 29.0 5 71 71.0 71.0 100.0 COMMU 2 2 2.0 2.0 3.0 4 19 19.0 19.0 22.0 5 78 78.0 78.0 100.0 COMMU 2 2 2.0 2.0 3.0 4 19 19.0 19.0 22.0 5 78 78.0 78.0 100.0 CONFLICT Valid 1 2 2.0 2.0 2.0 3 1 1.0 1.0 3.0 4 41 41.0 41.0 44.0 5 56 56.0 56.0 100.0

Variabel Nilai Nasabah Statistics EMOT SOCIAL QUALITY PRICE CV N Valid 100 100 100 100 100 Missing 0 0 0 0 0 Mean 4.49 4.47 4.61 4.51 4.5200 Median 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.5000 Sum 449 447 461 451 452.00 EMOT Valid 2 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 3 2 2.0 2.0 3.0 4 44 44.0 44.0 47.0 5 53 53.0 53.0 100.0 SOCIAL 2 1 1.0 1.0 2.0 3 1 1.0 1.0 3.0 4 44 44.0 44.0 47.0 5 53 53.0 53.0 100.0 QUALITY 2 2 2.0 2.0 3.0 4 29 29.0 29.0 32.0 5 68 68.0 68.0 100.0

PRICE Valid 1 2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2 1 1.0 1.0 3.0 3 1 1.0 1.0 4.0 4 36 36.0 36.0 40.0 5 60 60.0 60.0 100.0 Variabel Kualitas Layanan Statistics TANG EMP REA RESPON ASSURE SQ N Valid 100 100 100 100 100 100 Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mean 4.44 4.67 4.65 4.58 4.47 4.5620 Median 4.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.6000 Sum 444 467 465 458 447 456.20 TANG Valid 2 3 3.0 3.0 3.0 4 47 47.0 47.0 50.0 5 50 50.0 50.0 100.0 EMP Valid 3 3 3.0 3.0 3.0 4 27 27.0 27.0 30.0 5 70 70.0 70.0 100.0

REA 2 2 2.0 2.0 3.0 4 25 25.0 25.0 28.0 5 72 72.0 72.0 100.0 RESPON 2 2 2.0 2.0 3.0 4 32 32.0 32.0 35.0 5 65 65.0 65.0 100.0 ASSURE 2 1 1.0 1.0 2.0 3 2 2.0 2.0 4.0 4 42 42.0 42.0 46.0 5 54 54.0 54.0 100.0 Variabel Kepuasan Nasabah Statistics WOM HOPE EXPERIENCE COMMUN CS N Valid 100 100 100 100 100 Missing 0 0 0 0 0 Mean 4.26 4.54 4.60 4.56 4.4900 Median 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.5000 Sum 426 454 460 456 449.00

WOM Valid 2 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 3 2 2.0 2.0 3.0 4 67 67.0 67.0 70.0 5 30 30.0 30.0 100.0 HOPE 2 2 2.0 2.0 3.0 4 36 36.0 36.0 39.0 5 61 61.0 61.0 100.0 EXPERIENCE Valid 2 2 2.0 2.0 2.0 3 1 1.0 1.0 3.0 4 32 32.0 32.0 35.0 5 65 65.0 65.0 100.0 COMMUN Valid 1 2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2 1 1.0 1.0 3.0 3 2 2.0 2.0 5.0 4 29 29.0 29.0 34.0 5 66 66.0 66.0 100.0

Variabel Loyalitas Nasabah Statistics COG AFFECT CON ACT CL N Valid 100 100 100 100 100 Missing 0 0 0 0 0 Mean 4.37 4.60 4.64 4.53 4.5350 Median 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.7500 Sum 437 460 464 453 453.50 COG Valid 2 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 3 7 7.0 7.0 8.0 4 46 46.0 46.0 54.0 5 46 46.0 46.0 100.0 AFFECT 2 2 2.0 2.0 3.0 3 2 2.0 2.0 5.0 4 26 26.0 26.0 31.0 5 69 69.0 69.0 100.0 CON Valid 1 2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2 1 1.0 1.0 3.0 3 2 2.0 2.0 5.0 4 21 21.0 21.0 26.0 5 74 74.0 74.0 100.0

ACT 2 3 3.0 3.0 4.0 3 1 1.0 1.0 5.0 4 32 32.0 32.0 37.0 5 63 63.0 63.0 100.0 UJI VALIDITAS Customer Relationship Marketing Correlations TRUST COMMIT COMMU CONFLICT CRM TRUST Pearson Correlation 1.135.433 **.320 **.626 ** Sig. (2-tailed).182.000.001.000 COMMIT Pearson Correlation.135 1.455 **.410 **.696 ** Sig. (2-tailed).182.000.000.000 COMMU Pearson Correlation.433 **.455 ** 1.445 **.805 ** CONFLICT Pearson Correlation.320 **.410 **.445 ** 1.768 ** Sig. (2-tailed).001.000.000.000 CRM Pearson Correlation.626 **.696 **.805 **.768 ** 1 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Nilai Nasabah Correlations EMOT SOCIAL QUALITY PRICE CV EMOT Pearson Correlation 1.100.345 **.269 **.569 ** Sig. (2-tailed).321.000.007.000 SOCIAL Pearson Correlation.100 1.396 **.435 **.689 ** Sig. (2-tailed).321.000.000.000 QUALITY Pearson Correlation.345 **.396 ** 1.458 **.779 ** PRICE Pearson Correlation.269 **.435 **.458 ** 1.788 ** Sig. (2-tailed).007.000.000.000 CV Pearson Correlation.569 **.689 **.779 **.788 ** 1 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Kualitas Layanan Correlations TANG EMP REA RESPON ASSURE SQ TANG Pearson Correlation 1.217 *.435 **.363 **.454 **.696 ** Sig. (2-tailed).030.000.000.000.000 100 EMP Pearson Correlation.217 * 1.399 **.329 **.262 **.578 ** Sig. (2-tailed).030.000.001.008.000 100 REA Pearson Correlation.435 **.399 ** 1.553 **.437 **.796 **.000 100 RESPON Pearson Correlation.363 **.329 **.553 ** 1.435 **.762 ** Sig. (2-tailed).000.001.000.000.000 100 ASSURE Pearson Correlation.454 **.262 **.437 **.435 ** 1.736 ** Sig. (2-tailed).000.008.000.000.000 100

SQ Pearson Correlation.696 **.578 **.796 **.762 **.736 ** 1.000 100 *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Kepuasan Nasabah Correlations WOM HOPE EXPERIENCE COMMUN CS WOM Pearson Correlation 1.211 *.222 *.252 *.532 ** Sig. (2-tailed).035.026.011.000 HOPE Pearson Correlation.211 * 1.432 **.519 **.772 ** Sig. (2-tailed).035.000.000.000 EXPERIENCE Pearson Correlation.222 *.432 ** 1.496 **.741 ** Sig. (2-tailed).026.000.000.000 COMMUN Pearson Correlation.252 *.519 **.496 ** 1.821 ** Sig. (2-tailed).011.000.000.000 CS Pearson Correlation.532 **.772 **.741 **.821 ** 1 *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Loyalitas Nasabah Correlations COG AFFECT CON ACT CL COG Pearson Correlation 1.312 **.369 **.370 **.638 ** Sig. (2-tailed).002.000.000.000 AFFECT Pearson Correlation.312 ** 1.599 **.555 **.796 ** Sig. (2-tailed).002.000.000.000 CON Pearson Correlation.369 **.599 ** 1.633 **.844 **

ACT Pearson Correlation.370 **.555 **.633 ** 1.831 ** CL Pearson Correlation.638 **.796 **.844 **.831 ** 1 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). UJI RELIABILITAS Scale: ALL VARIABLES Customer Relationship Marketing Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 100 100.0 Excluded a 0.0 Total 100 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items.701 4 Nilai Nasabah Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 100 100.0 Excluded a 0.0 Total 100 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items.674 4

Kualitas Layanan Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 100 100.0 Excluded a 0.0 Total 100 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items.764 5 Kepuasan Nasabah Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 100 100.0 Excluded a 0.0 Total 100 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items.697 4 Loyalitas Nasabah Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 100 100.0 Excluded a 0.0 Total 100 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items.786 4

Regression CRM, Nilai Nasabah, Kualitas Layanan Æ Kepuasan Nasabah Variables Entered/Removed b Variables Variables Model Entered Removed Method 1 SQ, CRM, CV a. Enter a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: CS Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.909 a.826.821.20330 a. Predictors: (Constant), SQ, CRM, CV ANOVA b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 18.897 3 6.299 152.413.000 a Residual 3.968 96.041 Total 22.865 99 a. Predictors: (Constant), SQ, CRM, CV b. Dependent Variable: CS Coefficients a Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. 1 (Constant).190.204.935.352 CRM.236.109.236 2.173.032 CV.395.109.399 3.633.000 SQ.313.109.306 2.873.005 a. Dependent Variable: CS Kepuasan Nasabah Æ Loyalitas Nasabah Variables Entered/Removed b Variables Variables Model Entered Removed Method 1 CS a. Enter a. All requested variables entered.

Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.691 a.478.472.41218 a. Predictors: (Constant), CS ANOVA b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 15.228 1 15.228 89.637.000 a Residual 16.649 98.170 Total 31.878 99 a. Predictors: (Constant), CS b. Dependent Variable: CL Coefficients a Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. 1 (Constant).871.389 2.237.028 CS.816.086.691 9.468.000 a. Dependent Variable: CL