Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Similar documents
LAMPIRAN. Tahun Bulan NPF (Milyar Rupiah)

Appendixes Appendix 1 Data of Dependent Variables and Independent Variables Period

Lampiran 1. Tabulasi Data

Kabupaten Langkat Suku Bunga Kredit. PDRB harga berlaku

LAMPIRAN PERHITUNGAN EVIEWS

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I

Lampiran I Data. PDRB (Juta Rupiah) PMA (Juta Rupiah) PMDN (Juta Rupiah) Tahun. Luas Sawit (ha)

LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN. = Pengeluaran Konsumsi Masyarakat (milyar rupiah) = Jumlah Uang Beredar (milyar rupiah) = Laju Inflasi (dalam persentase)

Export and Import Regressions on 2009Q1 preliminary release data Menzie Chinn, 23 June 2009 ( )

DATA PENELITIAN. Pendapatan Nasional (PDB Perkapita atas Dasar Harga Berlaku) Produksi Bawang Merah Indonesia MB X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6

Hasil Common Effect Model

DATA VARIABEL PENELITIAN

LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN. A. Perhitungan Return On Asset

Lampiran 1 : Grafik Data HIV Asli

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 2. 2) graphs. 3) unit root tests

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 1. 2) descriptive statistics and correlogram. Series: LGCSI Sample 12/31/ /11/2009 Observations 2596

Lampiran 1 Lampiran 1 Data Keuangan Bank konvensional

LAMPIRAN. Null Hypothesis: LO has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 1 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=13)

Lampiran 1. Data PDB, Pengeluaran Pemerintah, jumlah uang beredar, pajak, dan tingkat suku bunga

Anexos. Pruebas de estacionariedad. Null Hypothesis: TES has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=9)

LAMPIRAN 1. Retribusi (ribu Rp)

esia/perkembangan/

Impact of Direct Taxes on GDP: A Study

BYLAAG: E-VIEWS RESULTATE VAN DIE MODEL VAN VOORRAADINVESTERING IN SUID-AFRIKA

Financial Risk, Liquidity Risk and their Effect on the Listed Jordanian Islamic Bank's Performance

LAMPIRAN. A. Data. PAD (juta) INVESTASI (%) PDRB (juta) Kulon Progo. Bantul. Gunung Kidul. Sleman

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Wilayah Tahun PAD JOW PDRB JH JR Yogyakarta

The Influence of Leverage and Profitability on Earnings Quality: Jordanian Case

ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE EXPENSES OF SOCIAL PROTECTION AND THE ANTICIPATED OLD AGE PENSION

Estimating Egypt s Potential Output: A Production Function Approach

Donald Trump's Random Walk Up Wall Street

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANNEL OF MONETARY POLICY TRANSMISSION MECHANISM IN SRI LANKA

MỘT SỐ KHUYẾT TẬT CỦA MÔ HÌNH HỒI QUY

Financial Econometrics: Problem Set # 3 Solutions

Economics 442 Macroeconomic Policy (Spring 2015) 3/23/2015. Instructor: Prof. Menzie Chinn UW Madison

Analysis of the Influence of the Annualized Rate of Rentability on the Unit Value of the Net Assets of the Private Administered Pension Fund NN

Methods for A Time Series Approach to Estimating Excess Mortality Rates in Puerto Rico, Post Maria 1 Menzie Chinn 2 August 10, 2018 Procedure:

Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven growth: A panel econometrics approach

BEcon Program, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University Page 1/7

Openness and Inflation

Influence of Macroeconomic Indicators on Mutual Funds Market in India

Appendix. Table A.1 (Part A) The Author(s) 2015 G. Chakrabarti and C. Sen, Green Investing, SpringerBriefs in Finance, DOI /

UJI COMMON EFFECT MODEL

Notes on the Treasury Yield Curve Forecasts. October Kara Naccarelli

Fall 2004 Social Sciences 7418 University of Wisconsin-Madison Problem Set 5 Answers

Relative Effectiveness of Fiscal and Monetary Policies in Nigeria

POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ECONOMETRICS. Mr.

Trading Volume and Fama-French Three Factor Model on Excess Return. Empirical Evidence from Nairobi Security Exchange

Factors Affecting the Movement of Stock Market: Evidence from India

Time Series Analysis of Inflation and RBI Policy Rates

INFLUENCE OF CONTRIBUTION RATE DYNAMICS ON THE PENSION PILLAR II ON THE

Nexus between stock exchange index and exchange rates

1. A test of the theory is the regression, since no arbitrage implies, Under the null: a = 0, b =1, and the error e or u is unpredictable.

The Relationship Between Internet Marketing, Search Volume, and Product Sales. Honors Research Thesis

Muhammad Nasir SHARIF 1 Kashif HAMID 2 Muhammad Usman KHURRAM 3 Muhammad ZULFIQAR 4 1

Supplementary Materials for

MICROFINANCE LENDING TO SHGs AND ITS NEXUS ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN INDIA: AN ARDL ANALYSIS

An Analysis of Macroeconomic Factors Affecting Foreign Exchange Rate

The Effects of Oil Price Volatility on Some Macroeconomic Variables in Nigeria: Application of Garch and Var Models

COTTON: PHYSICAL PRICES BECOMING MORE RESPONSIVE TO FUTURES PRICES0F

FBBABLLR1CBQ_US Commercial Banks: Assets - Bank Credit - Loans and Leases - Residential Real Estate (Bil, $, SA)

23571 Introductory Econometrics Assignment B (Spring 2017)

Foreign and Public Investment and Economic Growth: The Case of Romania

LAMPIRAN. Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob.

ARDL Approach for Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Pakistan ( ): An Empirical Study

Does it influence? Macro variables on stock returns.

Factor Affecting Yields for Treasury Bills In Pakistan?

Okun s Law - an empirical test using Brazilian data

FIN 533. Autocorrelations of CPI Inflation

CHAPTER 5 MARKET LEVEL INDUSTRY LEVEL AND FIRM LEVEL VOLATILITY

Econometric Models for the Analysis of Financial Portfolios

Composition of Government Expenditure and Economic Growth in Ethiopia ( G.C)

Santi Chaisrisawatsuk 16 November 2017 Thimpu, Bhutan

A FUNCTION FOR THE ARGENTINE EXPORT DEMAND. Maria Luisa Streb

Appendices. Appendix 1 Buy ranges for each portfolio

SUSTAINABILITY PLANNING POLICY COLLECTING THE REVENUES OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATION

Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture

9. Appendixes. Page 73 of 95

The Frequency of Wars*

TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS OF AN EFFICIENT MARKET IN TERMS OF INFORMATION THE CASE OF THE CAPITAL MARKET IN ROMANIA DURING RECESSION

Can the Taylor Rule Describe the Monetary Policy in China?

An Analysis of the Relationship between Public Spending Components and Private investments in Nigeria

Forecasting the Philippine Stock Exchange Index using Time Series Analysis Box-Jenkins

Monetary Economics Portfolios Risk and Returns Diversification and Risk Factors Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015

An Examination of Seasonality in Indian Stock Markets With Reference to NSE

CHAPTER V RELATION BETWEEN FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH DURING PRE AND POST LIBERALISATION PERIOD

Determinants of Merchandise Export Performance in Sri Lanka

Impact of Monetary Policy on Small Scale Enterprises Financing in Nigeria

RESEARCH ON INFLUENCING FACTORS OF RURAL CONSUMPTION IN CHINA-TAKE SHANDONG PROVINCE AS AN EXAMPLE.

Interactions between United States (VIX) and United Kingdom (VFTSE) Market Volatility: A Time Series Study

Effect of Macroeconomic Variables on Foreign Direct Investment in Pakistan

Übungsblatt 4. Please examine below OLS estimation results for the log earnings of Egyptian wage workers and answer the below questions:

An Analysis of Stock Returns and Exchange Rates: Evidence from IT Industry in India

International Journal of Research and Review E-ISSN: ; P-ISSN:

THE DETERMINANT OF INFLATION IN INDONESIA: PARTIAL ADJUSTMENT MODEL APPROACH

THE EFFECTS OF THE MACROECONOMIC DETERMINANTS ON SOVEREIGN CREDIT RATING OF TURKEY

9. Assessing the impact of the credit guarantee fund for SMEs in the field of agriculture - The case of Hungary

A Contrasting Test of the Risk Factors of the APT: Evidence from the Nigerian Stock Market

Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review Vol. 1, No.11; July 2012

Transcription:

LAMPIRAN

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian Tahun Impor PDB KURS DEVISA 1985 5.199,00 2.118.215,40 1.125,00 5.811,00 1986 5.825,00 2.242.661,60 1.641,00 5.841,00 1987 7.209,00 2.353.133,40 1.650,00 5.103,00 1988 6.548,00 2.489.156,30 1.729,00 6.688,00 1989 7.980,00 2.674.762,40 1.795,00 6.010,00 1990 9.739,00 2.868.472,20 1.901,00 6.259,00 1991 11.711,00 3.067.838,40 1.992,00 9.561,00 1992 11.671,00 3.266.002,20 2.062,00 10.500,00 1993 12.522,00 3.478.172,50 2.110,00 12.000,00 1994 16.161,00 3.740.425,70 2.200,00 12.700,00 1995 17.369,00 4.047.889,00 2.308,00 13.300,00 1996 19.485,00 4.364.354,20 2.383,00 16.000,00 1997 20.560,00 4.578.441,00 4.650,00 19.900,00 1998 21.500,00 3.952.189,00 8.025,00 16.600,00 1999 23.773,00 4.001.061,00 7.100,00 25.700,00 2000 25.455,00 4.197.917,10 9.595,00 29.300,00 2001 32.965,00 4.442.798,10 9.980,00 79.000,00 2002 30.996,00 4.538.187,70 8.940,00 71.600,00 2003 30.475,00 4.755.129,80 8.465,00 68.100,00 2004 34.920,00 4.994.354,40 9.290,00 86.300,00 2005 36.737,00 5.278.770,10 9.830,00 94.700,00 2006 33.349,00 5.569.539,30 9.020,00 42.600,00 2007 34.739,00 5.921.330,70 9.419,00 59.900,00 2008 35.476,00 6.278.127,50 10.950,00 51.600,00 2009 36.006,00 6.563.523,70 9.400,00 66.100,00 2010 40.449,00 6.864.133,10 8.991,00 96.200,00 2011 43.727,00 7.287.635,50 9.068,00 110.100,00 2012 44.255,00 7.727.083,40 9.670,00 112.800,00 2013 49.053,00 8.158.193,70 12.189,00 109.400,00 2014 48.869,00 8.568.155,60 13.795,00 111.800,00

Lampiran 2. Hasil Uji Stasioneritas Semua Variabel Tingkat Level 1. Impor Null Hypothesis: IMPOR has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -2.468927 0.1331 Test critical values: 1% level -3.679322 5% level -2.967767 10% level -2.622989 Dependent Variable: D(IMPOR) Sample (adjusted): 2 30 Included observations: 29 after adjustments IMPOR(-1) -0.062899 0.025476-2.468927 0.0202 C 0.701478 0.254935 2.751600 0.0105 R-squared 0.184182 Mean dependent var 0.073344 Adjusted R-squared 0.153966 S.D. dependent var 0.095185 S.E. of regression 0.087551 Akaike info criterion -1.966708 Sum squared resid 0.206962 Schwarz criterion -1.872412 Log likelihood 30.51727 Hannan-Quinn criter. -1.937176 F-statistic 6.095603 Durbin-Watson stat 2.478780 Prob(F-statistic) 0.020170

2. PDB Null Hypothesis: PDB has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -0.924033 0.7659 Test critical values: 1% level -3.679322 5% level -2.967767 10% level -2.622989 Dependent Variable: D(PDB) Sample (adjusted): 2 30 Included observations: 29 after adjustments PDB(-1) -0.019009 0.020572-0.924033 0.3637 C 0.337244 0.315042 1.070472 0.2939 R-squared 0.030654 Mean dependent var 0.046220 Adjusted R-squared -0.005247 S.D. dependent var 0.041087 S.E. of regression 0.041195 Akaike info criterion -3.474544 Sum squared resid 0.045819 Schwarz criterion -3.380248 Log likelihood 52.38088 Hannan-Quinn criter. -3.445011 F-statistic 0.853838 Durbin-Watson stat 1.518098 Prob(F-statistic) 0.363654

3. Kurs Null Hypothesis: KURS has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -0.903977 0.7724 Test critical values: 1% level -3.679322 5% level -2.967767 10% level -2.622989 Dependent Variable: D(KURS) Sample (adjusted): 2 30 Included observations: 29 after adjustments KURS(-1) -0.038524 0.042616-0.903977 0.3740 C 0.402331 0.365332 1.101273 0.2805 R-squared 0.029377 Mean dependent var 0.073414 Adjusted R-squared -0.006572 S.D. dependent var 0.176148 S.E. of regression 0.176726 Akaike info criterion -0.561965 Sum squared resid 0.843263 Schwarz criterion -0.467668 Log likelihood 10.14849 Hannan-Quinn criter. -0.532432 F-statistic 0.817175 Durbin-Watson stat 1.574591 Prob(F-statistic) 0.374003

4. Cadangan Devisa Null Hypothesis: DEVISA has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -1.019132 0.7328 Test critical values: 1% level -3.679322 5% level -2.967767 10% level -2.622989 Dependent Variable: D(DEVISA) Sample (adjusted): 2 30 Included observations: 29 after adjustments DEVISA(-1) -0.051733 0.050762-1.019132 0.3172 C 0.633249 0.524306 1.207786 0.2376 R-squared 0.037043 Mean dependent var 0.101787 Adjusted R-squared 0.001378 S.D. dependent var 0.292646 S.E. of regression 0.292444 Akaike info criterion 0.445387 Sum squared resid 2.309140 Schwarz criterion 0.539684 Log likelihood -4.458117 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.474920 F-statistic 1.038629 Durbin-Watson stat 2.411983 Prob(F-statistic) 0.317186

Lampiran 3. Hasil Uji Stasioneritas Semua Variabel First difference 1. Impor Null Hypothesis: D(IMPOR) has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -6.007808 0.0000 Test critical values: 1% level -3.689194 5% level -2.971853 10% level -2.625121 Dependent Variable: D(IMPOR,2) Sample (adjusted): 3 30 Included observations: 28 after adjustments D(IMPOR(-1)) -1.132183 0.188452-6.007808 0.0000 C 0.078392 0.022795 3.438912 0.0020 R-squared 0.581278 Mean dependent var -0.007613 Adjusted R-squared 0.565174 S.D. dependent var 0.142354 S.E. of regression 0.093870 Akaike info criterion -1.825062 Sum squared resid 0.229101 Schwarz criterion -1.729904 Log likelihood 27.55086 Hannan-Quinn criter. -1.795971 F-statistic 36.09376 Durbin-Watson stat 1.731075 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000002

2. PDB Null Hypothesis: D(PDB) has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -3.898208 0.0061 Test critical values: 1% level -3.689194 5% level -2.971853 10% level -2.625121 Dependent Variable: D(PDB,2) Sample (adjusted): 3 30 Included observations: 28 after adjustments D(PDB(-1)) -0.761492 0.195344-3.898208 0.0006 C 0.034736 0.012200 2.847125 0.0085 R-squared 0.368871 Mean dependent var -0.001717 Adjusted R-squared 0.344597 S.D. dependent var 0.051218 S.E. of regression 0.041464 Akaike info criterion -3.459222 Sum squared resid 0.044701 Schwarz criterion -3.364064 Log likelihood 50.42910 Hannan-Quinn criter. -3.430131 F-statistic 15.19603 Durbin-Watson stat 1.889157

3. Kurs Null Hypothesis: D(KURS) has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -4.155017 0.0032 Test critical values: 1% level -3.689194 5% level -2.971853 10% level -2.625121 Dependent Variable: D(KURS,2) Sample (adjusted): 3 30 Included observations: 28 after adjustments D(KURS(-1)) -0.798545 0.192188-4.155017 0.0003 C 0.060523 0.036773 1.645852 0.1118 R-squared 0.399041 Mean dependent var -0.000195 Adjusted R-squared 0.375927 S.D. dependent var 0.226030 S.E. of regression 0.178560 Akaike info criterion -0.539040 Sum squared resid 0.828971 Schwarz criterion -0.443883 Log likelihood 9.546565 Hannan-Quinn criter. -0.509950 F-statistic 17.26417 Durbin-Watson stat 1.932213 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000312

4. Cadangan devisa Null Hypothesis: D(DEVISA) has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -6.572860 0.0000 Test critical values: 1% level -3.689194 5% level -2.971853 10% level -2.625121 Dependent Variable: D(DEVISA,2) Sample (adjusted): 3 30 Included observations: 28 after adjustments D(DEVISA(-1)) -1.238579 0.188438-6.572860 0.0000 C 0.135397 0.058499 2.314539 0.0288 S.E. of regression 0.291150 Akaike info criterion 0.438794 Sum squared resid 2.203980 Schwarz criterion 0.533952 Log likelihood -4.143121 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.467885 Durbin-Watson stat 1.956297

Lampiran 4. Hasil Uji Kointegrasi Null Hypothesis: ECT has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -3.032730 0.0436 Test critical values: 1% level -3.679322 5% level -2.967767 10% level -2.622989 Dependent Variable: D(ECT) Sample (adjusted): 2 30 Included observations: 29 after adjustments ECT(-1) -0.412374 0.135975-3.032730 0.0053 C 0.006283 0.014595 0.430480 0.6703 R-squared 0.254091 Mean dependent var 0.004381 Adjusted R-squared 0.226465 S.D. dependent var 0.089281 S.E. of regression 0.078523 Akaike info criterion -2.184368 Sum squared resid 0.166480 Schwarz criterion -2.090072 Log likelihood 33.67334 Hannan-Quinn criter. -2.154836 F-statistic 9.197453 Durbin-Watson stat 2.048719 Prob(F-statistic) 0.005302

Lampiran 5. Hasil Regresi jangka panjang (OLS) Dependent Variable: IMPOR Sample: 1 30 Included observations: 30 C -4.822473 1.713328-2.814682 0.0092 PDB 0.711940 0.142381 5.000257 0.0000 KURS 0.235321 0.076844 3.062340 0.0051 DEVISA 0.184519 0.071101 2.595175 0.0153 R-squared 0.971716 Mean dependent var 10.01337 Adjusted R-squared 0.968452 S.D. dependent var 0.655090 S.E. of regression 0.116355 Akaike info criterion -1.340782 Sum squared resid 0.351999 Schwarz criterion -1.153955 Log likelihood 24.11173 Hannan-Quinn criter. -1.281014 F-statistic 297.7495 Durbin-Watson stat 0.635648 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Lampiran 6. Hasil Regresi Jangka Pendek (ECM) Dependent Variable: D(IMPOR) Sample (adjusted): 2 30 Included observations: 29 after adjustments C 0.023739 0.027723 0.856303 0.4003 D(PDB) 0.532363 0.417417 1.275373 0.2144 D(KURS) 0.138522 0.099626 1.390422 0.1772 D(DEVISA) 0.161967 0.054605 2.966139 0.0067 EC(-1) -0.359165 0.150456-2.387176 0.0252 R-squared 0.372552 Mean dependent var 0.073344 S.D. dependent var 0.095185 S.E. of regression 0.081439 Akaike info criterion -2.022342 Sum squared resid 0.159175 Schwarz criterion -1.786602 Log likelihood 34.32396 Hannan-Quinn criter. -1.948511 F-statistic 3.562542 Durbin-Watson stat 1.995861

Lampiran 7. Uji Heteroskedasitas Heteroskedasticity Test: White F-statistic 2.405697 Prob. F(3,26) 0.0902 Obs*R-squared 6.518112 Prob. Chi-Square(3) 0.0890 Scaled explained SS 5.701209 Prob. Chi-Square(3) 0.1271 Test Equation: Dependent Variable: RESID^2 Sample: 1 30 Included observations: 30 C 0.048675 0.122614 0.396976 0.6946 PDB^2 5.97E-05 0.000669 0.089294 0.9295 KURS^2-0.000764 0.000649-1.178544 0.2493 DEVISA^2 5.23E-05 0.000487 0.107436 0.9153 R-squared 0.217270 Mean dependent var 0.011733 Adjusted R-squared 0.126955 S.D. dependent var 0.018212 S.E. of regression 0.017017 Akaike info criterion -5.185633 Sum squared resid 0.007529 Schwarz criterion -4.998806 Log likelihood 81.78449 Hannan-Quinn criter. -5.125865 F-statistic 2.405697 Durbin-Watson stat 1.859129 Prob(F-statistic) 0.090167

Lampiran 8. Hasil Uji Autokrelasi Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM Test: F-statistic 0.408258 Prob. F(2,23) 0.6695 Obs*R-squared 0.994226 Prob. Chi-Square(2) 0.6083 Test Equation: Dependent Variable: RESID Date: 05/06/17 Time: 13:37 Sample: 2 30 Included observations: 29 Presample missing value lagged residuals set to zero. C 0.022706 0.884644 0.025667 0.9797 X1-0.010565 0.172615-0.061205 0.9517 X2 0.007485 0.071723 0.104363 0.9178 X3 0.004168 0.057042 0.073071 0.9424 RESID(-1) -0.131536 0.211303-0.622499 0.5397 RESID(-2) -0.157564 0.217117-0.725710 0.4753 R-squared 0.034284 Mean dependent var 9.00E-16 Adjusted R-squared -0.175655 S.D. dependent var 0.072674 S.E. of regression 0.078798 Akaike info criterion -2.061862 Sum squared resid 0.142810 Schwarz criterion -1.778974 Log likelihood 35.89700 Hannan-Quinn criter. -1.973265 F-statistic 0.163303 Durbin-Watson stat 2.030756 Prob(F-statistic) 0.973511

Lampiran 9. Linieritas Uji Linearitas Ramsey RESET Test Equation: UNTITLED Specification: IMPOR PDB DEVISA KURS Omitted Variables: Squares of fitted values Value df Probability t-statistic 1.762197 26 0.0898 F-statistic 3.105338 (1, 26) 0.0898 Likelihood ratio 3.384752 1 0.0658 F-test summary: Sum of Sq. df Mean Squares Test SSR 0.048999 1 0.048999 Restricted SSR 0.459256 27 0.017009 Unrestricted SSR 0.410256 26 0.015779 Unrestricted SSR 0.410256 26 0.015779 LR test summary: Value df Restricted LogL 20.12202 27 Unrestricted LogL 21.81440 26 Unrestricted Test Equation: Dependent Variable: IMPOR Sample: 1 30 Included observations: 30 Variable Coefficien t Std. Error Prob. PDB 0.371887 0.038711 9.606702 0.0000 DEVISA 0.024411 0.174011 0.140284 0.8895 KURS 0.097861 0.111012 0.881535 0.3861 FITTED^2 0.032001 0.018160 1.762197 0.0898 R-squared 0.967035 Mean dependent var 10.01337 Adjusted R-squared 0.963231 S.D. dependent var 0.655090 S.E. of regression 0.125615 Akaike info criterion -1.187627 Sum squared resid 0.410256 Schwarz criterion -1.000800 Log likelihood 21.81440 Hannan-Quinn criter. -1.127859 Durbin-Watson stat 0.582756

Lampiran 10. Hasil Uji Normalitas 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Series: Residuals Sample 1 30 Observations 30 Mean -3.40e-15 Median 0.012090 Maximum 0.198944 Minimum -0.260802 Std. Dev. 0.110172 Skewness -0.466161 Kurtosis 3.329008 Jarque-Bera 1.221837 Probability 0.542852 0-0.3-0.2-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2