LAMPIRAN 1. Retribusi (ribu Rp)

Similar documents
LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Wilayah Tahun PAD JOW PDRB JH JR Yogyakarta

LAMPIRAN. A. Data. PAD (juta) INVESTASI (%) PDRB (juta) Kulon Progo. Bantul. Gunung Kidul. Sleman

Hasil Common Effect Model

LAMPIRAN PERHITUNGAN EVIEWS

UJI COMMON EFFECT MODEL

LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN. A. Perhitungan Return On Asset

Lampiran 1 Lampiran 1 Data Keuangan Bank konvensional

LAMPIRAN. Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob.

Lampiran I Data. PDRB (Juta Rupiah) PMA (Juta Rupiah) PMDN (Juta Rupiah) Tahun. Luas Sawit (ha)

Appendixes Appendix 1 Data of Dependent Variables and Independent Variables Period

Export and Import Regressions on 2009Q1 preliminary release data Menzie Chinn, 23 June 2009 ( )

Lampiran 1 : Grafik Data HIV Asli

Lampiran 1. Tabulasi Data

DATA VARIABEL PENELITIAN

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Kabupaten Langkat Suku Bunga Kredit. PDRB harga berlaku

Economics 442 Macroeconomic Policy (Spring 2015) 3/23/2015. Instructor: Prof. Menzie Chinn UW Madison

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Lampiran 1 Daftar Perusahaan Manufaktur

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 2. 2) graphs. 3) unit root tests

LAMPIRAN. Tahun Bulan NPF (Milyar Rupiah)

DATA PENELITIAN. Pendapatan Nasional (PDB Perkapita atas Dasar Harga Berlaku) Produksi Bawang Merah Indonesia MB X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6

Supplementary Materials for

Lampiran 1. Data PDB, Pengeluaran Pemerintah, jumlah uang beredar, pajak, dan tingkat suku bunga

BEcon Program, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University Page 1/7

Appendix. Table A.1 (Part A) The Author(s) 2015 G. Chakrabarti and C. Sen, Green Investing, SpringerBriefs in Finance, DOI /

Openness and Inflation

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 1. 2) descriptive statistics and correlogram. Series: LGCSI Sample 12/31/ /11/2009 Observations 2596

Donald Trump's Random Walk Up Wall Street

LAMPIRAN. Null Hypothesis: LO has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 1 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=13)

Notes on the Treasury Yield Curve Forecasts. October Kara Naccarelli

9. Assessing the impact of the credit guarantee fund for SMEs in the field of agriculture - The case of Hungary

LAMPIRAN. Universitas Sumatera Utara

THE IMPACT OF BANKING RISKS ON THE CAPITAL OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN LIBYA

Study Bubble Price in Housing Market (Case Study: State Bushehr)

esia/perkembangan/

Monetary Economics Portfolios Risk and Returns Diversification and Risk Factors Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015

Appendices. Appendix 1 Buy ranges for each portfolio

Santi Chaisrisawatsuk 16 November 2017 Thimpu, Bhutan

Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven growth: A panel econometrics approach

The Relationship Between Internet Marketing, Search Volume, and Product Sales. Honors Research Thesis

LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN. = Pengeluaran Konsumsi Masyarakat (milyar rupiah) = Jumlah Uang Beredar (milyar rupiah) = Laju Inflasi (dalam persentase)

Impact of Ownership Structure on Earnings Management: Evidence from Pakistani Banking Sector

The 7 Smart Collaboration for Business in Technology and Information Industries 2016

Financial Econometrics: Problem Set # 3 Solutions

FIN 533. Autocorrelations of CPI Inflation

Anexos. Pruebas de estacionariedad. Null Hypothesis: TES has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=9)

23571 Introductory Econometrics Assignment B (Spring 2017)

POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ECONOMETRICS. Mr.

Chapter-3. Sectoral Composition of Economic Growth and its Major Trends in India

ACCOUNTING MANIPULATIONS AND FIRMS FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM NIGERIA

Fall 2004 Social Sciences 7418 University of Wisconsin-Madison Problem Set 5 Answers

Influence of Macroeconomic Indicators on Mutual Funds Market in India

Methods for A Time Series Approach to Estimating Excess Mortality Rates in Puerto Rico, Post Maria 1 Menzie Chinn 2 August 10, 2018 Procedure:

FBBABLLR1CBQ_US Commercial Banks: Assets - Bank Credit - Loans and Leases - Residential Real Estate (Bil, $, SA)

Impact of Working Capital Management on Profitability: A Case of the Pakistan Textile Industry

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I

Muhammad Nasir SHARIF 1 Kashif HAMID 2 Muhammad Usman KHURRAM 3 Muhammad ZULFIQAR 4 1

Financial Risk, Liquidity Risk and their Effect on the Listed Jordanian Islamic Bank's Performance

COTTON: PHYSICAL PRICES BECOMING MORE RESPONSIVE TO FUTURES PRICES0F

1. A test of the theory is the regression, since no arbitrage implies, Under the null: a = 0, b =1, and the error e or u is unpredictable.

THE IMPACT OF OIL REVENUES ON BUDGET DEFICIT IN SELECTED OIL COUNTRIES

Analysis of the Influence of the Annualized Rate of Rentability on the Unit Value of the Net Assets of the Private Administered Pension Fund NN

An Investigation of Effective Factors on Export in Iran

Back from the Dead: the GFC and the Resurrection of Long Term Unemployment

SUSTAINABILITY PLANNING POLICY COLLECTING THE REVENUES OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATION

Factor Affecting Yields for Treasury Bills In Pakistan?

Employment growth and Unemployment rate reduction: Historical experiences and future labour market outcomes

Effect of Social Responsibility Costs on Value of Quoted Firms in Nigeria: Sectoral Analysis

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2014, 6(6): Research Article

International Journal of Research and Review E-ISSN: ; P-ISSN:

The Influence of Leverage and Profitability on Earnings Quality: Jordanian Case

ICOI-2018 The 2018 International Conference of Organizational Innovation Volume Aty Herawati and Firly Irradha Fauzia

New York Science Journal 2016;9(11)

ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE EXPENSES OF SOCIAL PROTECTION AND THE ANTICIPATED OLD AGE PENSION

INFLUENCE OF CONTRIBUTION RATE DYNAMICS ON THE PENSION PILLAR II ON THE

Does the spin-off policy can accelerate the deposit funds in the Indonesian Islamic banking industry?

Forecasting the Philippine Stock Exchange Index using Time Series Analysis Box-Jenkins

The Effect of Inflation Uncertainty on the Capital Structure of Non-Financial Firms

The Frequency of Wars*

1.4 Show the steps necessary to obtain relative PPP in growth rates.

RESEARCH ON INFLUENCING FACTORS OF RURAL CONSUMPTION IN CHINA-TAKE SHANDONG PROVINCE AS AN EXAMPLE.

Business Survey and Short-Term Projection

Quantitative evidence of post-crisis structural macroeconomic changes

Okun s Law - an empirical test using Brazilian data

Exchange Rate and Economic Performance - A Comparative Study of Developed and Developing Countries

Sample Copy + 1,9784 X 2 1,2106 X 3. + e 1

Lampiran 1. Kode Perusahaan. No. Universitas Sumatera Utara

Effect of Profitability and Financial Leverage on Capita Structure in Pakistan Textile Firms

The Role of Banking Development Quality in the FDI-Growth Nexus: Panel Evidence

MỘT SỐ KHUYẾT TẬT CỦA MÔ HÌNH HỒI QUY

THE IMPACT OF INSURANCE ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NIGERIA

Investment and financing constraints in Iran

Impact of Direct Taxes on GDP: A Study

CHAPTER 5 MARKET LEVEL INDUSTRY LEVEL AND FIRM LEVEL VOLATILITY

9. Appendixes. Page 73 of 95

Volume-5, Issue-1, June-2018 ISSN No:

Estimating Egypt s Potential Output: A Production Function Approach

An Examination of Seasonality in Indian Stock Markets With Reference to NSE

The Impact of Credit Risk Management in the Profitability of Albanian Commercial Banks During the Period

Transcription:

LAMPIRAN 1 Kabupaten Kulonprogo Bantul Gunung Kidul Tahun Retribusi (ribu Rp) Obyek Wisata Wisatawan PDRB (juta Rp) 2001 6694566 8 227250 3486573.5 2002 7779217 11 211529 3630220.3 2003 9247557 7 190333 3782326.5 2004 8903531 20 180129 3952153 2005 13872526 12 224604 4140670.7 2006 17410319 7 213128 4308367.9 2007 19148107 7 235962 4485872.7 2008 22069419 14 547024 4697157.3 2009 4908775 14 416819 4883634.4 2010 4019852 16 429357 5033073.6 2011 4221988 18 545743 5246146.8 2012 9902587 18 596529 5475148.2 2013 12195609 18 631759 5741660.3 2014 16506006 18 673153 5992787.2 2001 8467348 7 1827379 8188697 2002 12162663 10 1480578 8553912.9 2003 18489366 6 1556885 8955091.5 2004 18691494 7 1537352 9406428.1 2005 21333932 9 1445923 9875808.9 2006 26045895 6 1367666 10075300.3 2007 25413436 5 1050065 10530703.9 2008 30375944 6 1417254 11046708.4 2009 38366192 6 1447366 11540496.3 2010 56473039 7 1287280 12114059.2 2011 21452299 8 1816581 12728666.3 2012 21512622 8 2378209 13407021.8 2013 24586237 8 2037674 14138719.3 2014 20725749 8 2305988 14867408.8 2001 6375894 9 348393 6415531.9 2002 9009395 7 344986 6624678.3 2003 9906188 10 346980 6847267.5 2004 11650699 18 353132 7082128.8 2005 14490483 18 264626 7388785 2006 16866338 8 206654 7671036.6 2007 13919826 7 309662 7970974.1 2008 14860432 7 416406 8320899.9

2009 18250553 7 529319 8495475.7 2010 22368630 8 488805 8848037.9 2011 8656638 9 688381 9248010.9 2012 17231674 18 1279065 9695979.8 2013 22286629 18 1337438 10177432.5 2014 21645534 18 1955817 10639465.7 2001 11773895 3 576825 11396969.8 2002 14193457 24 901259 11909833.4 2003 16093220 19 1370877 12476741.5 2004 18269452 19 1707175 13106817 2005 20879935 19 1135741 13739876.2 2006 24202491 9 913916 14285349.3 Yogyakarta 2007 28564717 25 1962775 14922475.9 2008 30694251 21 2494661 15686506.7 2009 21413989 25 3427096 16386124.9 2010 28732950 29 2416927 17202154 2011 30068639 23 3463638 18206086.7 2012 32075528 23 4084303 19189074.8 2013 32931371 25 4300287 20239557.7 2014 42446340 25 4916984 21312143.8 Sleman 2001 8268613 19 4118216 14056528.4 2002 10225900 24 2243775 14739675.7 2003 12166002 30 6608560 15488451.2 2004 19293283 49 3586033 16301594.9 2005 25183162 30 1993447 17121565.2 2006 30885742 18 1056463 17892035.6 2007 40626270 19 1691274 18716858.5 2008 41004207 25 2336900 19677033.4 2009 49331794 22 3895824 20558564.5 2010 55775994 22 3535024 21481644 2011 32611090 34 2827900 22645851.9 2012 32199504 63 3169450 23957112.8 2013 30437957 63 3140170 25367414.2 2014 32537957 63 4091445 26740537.1

LAMPIRAN 2 Common Effects Method: Pooled Least Squares Date: 09/27/16 Time: 13:23 Obyek_wisata? -0.008861 0.004210-2.104691 0.0391 LOG(jumlah_wisatawan?) -0.133897 0.086947-1.539991 0.1283 LOG(PDRB?) 1.158838 0.073316 15.80615 0.0000 R-squared 0.552124 Mean dependent var 16.70588 Adjusted R-squared 0.538755 S.D. dependent var 0.599501 S.E. of regression 0.407152 Akaike info criterion 1.082649 Sum squared resid 11.10675 Schwarz criterion 1.179013 Log likelihood -34.89271 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.120926 Durbin-Watson stat 0.772908 Fixed Effect Dependent Variable: LOG(RETRIBUSI?) Method: Pooled Least Squares Date: 09/27/16 Time: 13:20 C -14.93984 4.794104-3.116294 0.0028 Obyek_wisata? -0.009600 0.005930-1.618713 0.1106 LOG(jumlah_wisatawan?) -0.295010 0.116041-2.542289 0.0135 LOG(PDRB?) 2.223058 0.344800 6.447389 0.0000 Fixed Effects (Cross) _KULONPROGO--C 0.829474 _BANTUL--C 0.119023 _GUNUNGKIDUL--C -0.006943 _YOGYAKARTA--C -0.396058 _SLEMAN--C -0.545496 Cross-section fixed (dummy variables) R-squared 0.649979 Mean dependent var 16.70588 Adjusted R-squared 0.610460 S.D. dependent var 0.599501

S.E. of regression 0.374167 Akaike info criterion 0.978983 Sum squared resid 8.680073 Schwarz criterion 1.235954 Log likelihood -26.26441 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.081055 F-statistic 16.44745 Durbin-Watson stat 1.034652 Random Effects Method: Pooled EGLS (Cross-section random effects) Date: 09/27/16 Time: 13:22 Swamy and Arora estimator of component variances C 0.656819 1.973378 0.332840 0.7403 Obyek_wisata? -0.008284 0.004239-1.954117 0.0549 LOG(jumlah_wisatawan?) -0.114721 0.098508-1.164588 0.2484 LOG(PDRB?) 1.101077 0.186161 5.914665 0.0000 Random Effects (Cross) _KULONPROGO--C 0.000000 _BANTUL--C 0.000000 _GUNUNGKIDUL--C 0.000000 _YOGYAKARTA--C 0.000000 _SLEMAN--C 0.000000 S.D. Rho Cross-section random 0.000000 0.0000 Idiosyncratic random 0.374167 1.0000 Weighted Statistics R-squared 0.552749 Mean dependent var 16.70588 Adjusted R-squared 0.532420 S.D. dependent var 0.599501 S.E. of regression 0.409938 Sum squared resid 11.09124 F-statistic 27.18943 Durbin-Watson stat 0.768171 Unweighted Statistics R-squared 0.552749 Mean dependent var 16.70588 Sum squared resid 11.09124 Durbin-Watson stat 0.768171 Uji Chow Redundant Fixed Effects Tests

Pool: PANEL Test cross-section fixed effects Effects Test Statistic d.f. Prob. Cross-section F 4.305615 (4,62) 0.0039 Cross-section Chi-square 17.158781 4 0.0018 Cross-section fixed effects test equation: Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 09/27/16 Time: 13:24 C 0.656819 2.162034 0.303797 0.7622 Obyek_wisata? -0.008284 0.004645-1.783604 0.0791 LOG(jumlah_wisatawan?) -0.114721 0.107925-1.062968 0.2917 LOG(PDRB?) 1.101077 0.203958 5.398560 0.0000 R-squared 0.552749 Mean dependent var 16.70588 Adjusted R-squared 0.532420 S.D. dependent var 0.599501 S.E. of regression 0.409938 Akaike info criterion 1.109823 Sum squared resid 11.09124 Schwarz criterion 1.238308 Log likelihood -34.84380 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.160859 F-statistic 27.18943 Durbin-Watson stat 0.768171 UjiHausman Correlated Random Effects - Hausman Test Pool: PANEL Test cross-section random effects Test Summary Chi-Sq. Statistic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob. Cross-section random 17.185721 3 0.0006 ** WARNING: estimated cross-section random effects variance is zero. Cross-section random effects test comparisons: Variable Fixed Random Var(Diff.) Prob. Obyek_wisata? -0.009600-0.008284 0.000017 0.7511 LOG(jumlah_wisatawan?) -0.295010-0.114721 0.003762 0.0033 LOG(PDRB?) 2.223058 1.101077 0.084231 0.0001

Cross-section random effects test equation: Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 09/27/16 Time: 13:25 C -14.93984 4.794104-3.116294 0.0028 Obyek_wisata? -0.009600 0.005930-1.618713 0.1106 LOG(jumlah_wisatawan?) -0.295010 0.116041-2.542289 0.0135 LOG(PDRB?) 2.223058 0.344800 6.447389 0.0000 Cross-section fixed (dummy variables) R-squared 0.649979 Mean dependent var 16.70588 Adjusted R-squared 0.610460 S.D. dependent var 0.599501 S.E. of regression 0.374167 Akaike info criterion 0.978983 Sum squared resid 8.680073 Schwarz criterion 1.235954 Log likelihood -26.26441 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.081055 F-statistic 16.44745 Durbin-Watson stat 1.034652 UjiHeteroskedastisitas Dependent Variable: RESID? Method: Pooled Least Squares Date: 09/27/16 Time: 13:19 C -4.165258 2.712749-1.535438 0.1298 Obyek_wisata? -0.008638 0.003356-2.573981 0.0125 LOG(jumlah_wisatawan?) 0.070791 0.065662 1.078119 0.2852 LOG(PDRB?) 0.222572 0.195105 1.140782 0.2583 Fixed Effects (Cross) _KULONPROGO--C 0.391887 _BANTUL--C -0.089314 _GUNUNGKIDUL--C 0.005432 _YOGYAKARTA--C -0.225716 _SLEMAN--C -0.082289

Cross-section fixed (dummy variables) R-squared 0.267516 Mean dependent var 0.264191 Adjusted R-squared 0.184816 S.D. dependent var 0.234499 S.E. of regression 0.211723 Akaike info criterion -0.159866 Sum squared resid 2.779250 Schwarz criterion 0.097105 Log likelihood 13.59530 Hannan-Quinn criter. -0.057794 F-statistic 3.234785 Durbin-Watson stat 1.049275 Prob(F-statistic) 0.005462 UjiMultikolinearitas _KULONPROGO _BANTUL _GUNUNGKIDUL _YOGYAKARTA _SLEMAN _KULONPROGO 1.000000-0.053179 0.090950 0.116849-0.203223 _BANTUL -0.053179 1.000000 0.129528 0.103568 0.629959 _GUNUNGKIDUL 0.090950 0.129528 1.000000 0.264888 0.399998 _YOGYAKARTA 0.116849 0.103568 0.264888 1.000000 0.606125 _SLEMAN -0.203223 0.629959 0.399998 0.606125 1.000000