Using a Transactor/Revolver Scorecard to Make Credit and Pricing Decisions

Similar documents
Using a Transactor/Revolver scorecard to make credit and pricing decisions

Modelling LGD for unsecured personal loans

Credit Scoring and the Edinburgh Conferences: Fringe or International Festival. Lyn Thomas University of Southampton August 2011

Modelling the purchase propensity: analysis of a revolving store card

The Impact of Basel Accords on the Lender's Profitability under Different Pricing Decisions

Consumer Finance: Challenges for Operational Research. Lyn C Thomas School of Management University of Southampton Southampton

Non linearity issues in PD modelling. Amrita Juhi Lucas Klinkers

Credit Scoring in the Non- Conforming Mortgage Market

CREDIT SCORING & CREDIT CONTROL XIV August 2015 Edinburgh. Aneta Ptak-Chmielewska Warsaw School of Ecoomics

SELECTION BIAS REDUCTION IN CREDIT SCORING MODELS

Model Maestro. Scorto TM. Specialized Tools for Credit Scoring Models Development. Credit Portfolio Analysis. Scoring Models Development

MODELLING THE PROFITABILITY OF CREDIT CARDS FOR DIFFERENT TYPES OF BEHAVIOUR WITH PANEL DATA. Professor Jonathan Crook, Denys Osipenko

International Journal of Business and Administration Research Review, Vol. 1, Issue.1, Jan-March, Page 149

SOLUTIONS to Review Problems for Chapter 4. by Vladimir A. Dobrushkin

REJECT INFERENCE FOR CREDIT ADJUDICATION

Random Walks vs Random Variables. The Random Walk Model. Simple rate of return to an asset is: Simple rate of return

Modeling Credit Risk of Portfolio of Consumer Loans

DFAST Modeling and Solution

Model Maestro. Scorto. Specialized Tools for Credit Scoring Models Development. Credit Portfolio Analysis. Scoring Models Development

Developing WOE Binned Scorecards for Predicting LGD

Wider Fields: IFRS 9 credit impairment modelling

Comparison of single distribution and mixture distribution models for modelling LGD

A Production-Based Model for the Term Structure

Capital Allocation Between The Risky And The Risk- Free Asset

CHAPTER 6: RISK AVERSION AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION TO RISKY ASSETS

Monetary Economics Basic Flexible Price Models

Credit Scoring Solution Applied Methodology for Credit Insurance Juanjo Ortiz Osorio Risk Analysis Programme Manager SAS Spain

Credit Risk. MFF UK, Praha. 10 October Presented by: Jaroslav Kačmár

PASS Sample Size Software

SEGMENTATION FOR CREDIT-BASED DELINQUENCY MODELS. May 2006

DO WE NEED CUTOFFS? From Matching Accept Rates to Maximising RORAC

Is the Structural Approach More Accurate than the Statistical Approach in Bankruptcy Prediction?

Financial Distress Prediction Using Distress Score as a Predictor

Supplement to: Martin, Isaac W., and Jennifer M. Nations Taxation and Citizen Voice in School District Parcel Tax Elections.

logistic logistic Merton Black - Scholes Black&Cox Merton Longstaff&Schwarlz Jarrow&Turnbull

Optimal Interest Rate for a Borrower with Estimated Default and Prepayment Risk

Articles and Whitepapers on Collection & Recovery

Discussion of Relationship and Transaction Lending in a Crisis

Exam Quantitative Finance (35V5A1)

Foundations of Finance

Using survival models for profit and loss estimation. Dr Tony Bellotti Lecturer in Statistics Department of Mathematics Imperial College London

LGD Modelling for Mortgage Loans

Box C The Regulatory Capital Framework for Residential Mortgages

SSE Large&Mid&Small Cap Style Indices Methodology

Global Journal of Finance and Banking Issues Vol. 5. No Manu Sharma & Rajnish Aggarwal PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF HEDGE FUND INDICES

THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR CREDIT LIMIT UTILIZATION RATE

Decision Making. BUS 735: Business Decision Making and Research. Learn how to conduct regression analysis with a dummy independent variable.

LIFT-BASED QUALITY INDEXES FOR CREDIT SCORING MODELS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO GINI AND KS

American options and early exercise

Policy Analysis Field Examination Questions Spring 2014

Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms

Homework 1 Due February 10, 2009 Chapters 1-4, and 18-24

Amath 546/Econ 589 Introduction to Credit Risk Models

1. Introduction of another instrument of savings, namely, capital

CHAPTER 6: RISK AVERSION AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION TO RISKY ASSETS

PayNet Advanced Score of Scores ( PASS )

Web Appendix Figure 1. Operational Steps of Experiment

Lecture 12: The Bootstrap

Credit Risk. June 2014

Survival analysis of loan repayment rate of customers of Hawassa district commercial bank. Cheru Atsmegiorgis. Hawassa University, Hawassa,Ethiopia

Machine Learning Performance over Long Time Frame

CHAPTER 6: RISK AVERSION AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION TO RISKY ASSETS

Application and Development of Survival Analysis Techniques To The Credit Lending Process

Logistic Regression. Logistic Regression Theory

Credit Risk Evaluation of SMEs Based on Supply Chain Financing

The Cross-Section of Credit Risk Premia and Equity Returns

Real Time Macro Factors in Bond Risk Premium

Toolbox 7: Economic Feasibility Assessment Methods

Lecture 5 January 30

Contract Pricing and Market Efficiency: Can Peer-to-Peer Internet Credit Markets Improve Allocative Efficiency?

Marketplace Lending, Information Efficiency, and Liquidity

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Copyright 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Addison-Wesley.

Credit Risk Modeling Using Excel and VBA with DVD O. Gunter Loffler Peter N. Posch. WILEY A John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Publication

12 CREDIT LINES & CARDS YOU CAN GET FOR YOUR BUSINESS

Return and Risk: The Capital-Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

Profitable credit card business empirical analysis of factors

Basics. 7: Compounding Frequency. Lingua Franca (Language of the Trade) 7.1 Nominal and Effective Interest. Nominal and Effective.

Effects of Financial Parameters on Poverty - Using SAS EM

Scoring Credit Invisibles

An Empirical Study on Default Factors for US Sub-prime Residential Loans

Online Appendix A Quantitative Theory of Information, Worker Flows, and Wage Dispersion Amanda. M Michaud

2 f. f t S 2. Delta measures the sensitivityof the portfolio value to changes in the price of the underlying

CHAPTER 8: INDEX MODELS

Applied Macro Finance

Adverse Selection in the Loan Market

Session 57PD, Predicting High Claimants. Presenters: Zoe Gibbs Brian M. Hartman, ASA. SOA Antitrust Disclaimer SOA Presentation Disclaimer

Economics 424/Applied Mathematics 540. Final Exam Solutions

NPTEL Project. Econometric Modelling. Module 16: Qualitative Response Regression Modelling. Lecture 20: Qualitative Response Regression Modelling

E&G, Ch. 1: Theory of Choice; Utility Analysis - Certainty

Mean-Variance Analysis

Servicing the Public Debt: the Role of Government s Behavior Towards Debt

Economia e Gestione degli Intermediari Finanziari. Set 4. LIUC - Università Cattaneo A.Y. 2017/18 Valter Lazzari

OPTIMAL RISKY PORTFOLIOS- ASSET ALLOCATIONS. BKM Ch 7

Financial Risk Management

Capital Structure Theory & Applications

February 2 Math 2335 sec 51 Spring 2016

PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

Course 2 May 2003 Answer Key

Chapter 4 - Level 1 - Course FM Solutions

Transcription:

Using a Transactor/Revolver Scorecard to Make Credit and Pricing Decisions Mee Chi So Lyn Thomas University of Southampton Hsin-Vonn Seow University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus

The Standard Approach All credit card applicants Use a credit scorecard to make credit decision Accepted credit card users Transactors Revolvers

Transactors and Revolvers Transactors all are Goods profit from merchant service charge only Revolvers higher chance to be Bads main profit from interest on the balance Important in terms of default risk More important in terms of profitability Could we estimate this when making credit decision?

Our Proposed Approach All credit card applicants Use a credit scorecard Use a tran/rev scorecard A combined score Accepted credit card users

A Combined Score Define: T-Transactor, R-Revolver, G-Good, B-Bad A score gives the probability the new customer is likely to be Good: P G x = P T x P(G x, T) + P R x P G x, R Since no Transactor can default, P(G x, T)=1. Therefore, P(G x) = P T x + P R x P G x, R

To Develop The Two Scorecards The Tran/Rev Scorecard Using all data s t x = ln P T x P T x = 1, P R x = 1 P R x 1+e s t (x) 1+e s t (x) The Good/Bad Scorecard to Revolvers Only Using revolvers data only s R x = ln P(G x,r) P(B x,r) P G x, R = P B x, R = 1, 1+e s R (x) 1 1 + e s R(x)

A Numeric Example Credit card data from a Hong Kong bank Accounts opened 2002-2005; Outcome period: 2006 Total 6,308 accounts: 1,577 Bad, 4,731 Good List of variables: Occupation, Education type, Citizenship, Residential type, Employment status, Annual income, Months with bank and Age Use weight-of-evidence for all characteristics Use stepwise logistic regression Use ten-fold cross validation Good Bad Total Transactor(count and column %) 2958 (63%) 0 (0%) 2958 (47%) Revolver(count and column %) 1773 (37%) 1577 (100%) 3350 (53%) Total(count) 4731 1577 6308

Coefficients for All Scorecards Variable (WoE) Standard Scorecard (Event=Good) Coefficient (Mean) Coefficient (S.D.) Transactor/Revolver Scorecard (Event=Transactor) Coefficient (Mean) Coefficient (S.D.) Good/Bad Scorecard (by Revolvers only) (Event=Good) Coefficient (Mean) Coefficient (S.D.) Intercept 1.3929*** 0.0072-0.1254** 0.0053 0.4291*** 0.0125 Occupation 0.7796*** 0.0292 0.5994*** 0.0209 0.5287*** 0.0328 Education type 1.3961*** 0.0678 0.4701** 0.0556 1.4056*** 0.0745 Citizenship 1.2286*** 0.0743 0.9286*** 0.0255 0.8748** 0.0850 Residential type Employment status Months with bank Annual income 1.1147*** 0.0578 0.1146**# 0.1848 1.1741*** 0.0187 - - 0.6864*** 0.0391 0.3951** 0.0430 0.7998*** 0.0209 0.2150** 0.0290 0.7486*** 0.0707 - - 0.8240*** 0.0259 - - Age - - 0.2660** 0.0291 - - *** significant at 0.0001; ** significant at 0.05; #selected by three models only. For models do not pick up the variable, we assume the coefficients equal 0.

Gini Coefficients Gini coefficients for different scorecards Standard Tran/Rev G/B with Rev only Combined ROC Contrast Test Results between Standard and Combined Validation 1 0.592 0.45 0.596 0.592 0.039(0.8434) Validation 2 0.47 0.394 0.47 0.474 0.5008(0.4791) Validation 3 0.556 0.45 0.542 0.558 0.0488(0.8251) Validation 4 0.52 0.42 0.518 0.511 2.1165(0.1457) Validation 5 0.482 0.426 0.486 0.48 0.0789(0.7788) Validation 6 0.526 0.4 0.53 0.53 0.3427(0.5583) Validation 7 0.512 0.428 0.506 0.508 0.9092(0.3403) Validation 8 0.524 0.44 0.522 0.532 0.057(0.8114) Validation 9 0.548 0.432 0.54 0.542 0.8449(0.358) Validation 10 0.484 0.47 0.48 0.49 1.2506(0.2634) Average 0.522 0.431 0.519 0.522

ROC Curves for Two Folds Validation 1 Validation 4

Credit Card Profitability Model If the interest rate offered on credit cards is r, the corresponding expected monthly profit for the lender is: e r, p : the expected monthly profit of a customer with hazard rate p 1 E(r) = e r, p p (r) q r, p f p dp f(p): The distribution of the Good hazard rates p (r): the cut-off level of the hazard rate of being Good q(r, p): a customer s take-up probability

Risk and Take Function Population s hazard risk distribution F p = 0, p < 0.5 2p 2 2p + 0.5,0.5 p < 1 1, p = 1 Take Function (Phillips, 2005; Thomas, 2009) q r, p = Max{0, 3 10r 2p} For example, if interest rate r = 3% and the hazard rate is 0.9, the take rate is q 3%, 0.9 = 3 10 3% 2(0.9) = 90%

The Expected Profit: e(r, p) Income interchange fees and interest on balance The expected profit: e r, p = Interchange fee Average Purchase +P(Not Default in N period) (Repayment in N period) +P Default in N period Recovery via Collection Given an interest rate, find the optimal cut-off probability by e r, p = 0 p = (1 m)(1 + r F) N l D (1 + r) N 1 + l D 1 l D Parameters required m Interchange rate r Interest per period of the credit cards r F Interest rate at which lenders can borrow money per period l D Loss given default (LGD) N Average number of periods before repaying the average purchase 1/N

To Estimate N N: average number of periods before a purchase is paid off B: average balance carried over per period per customer P: average amount purchased per period per customer C: average repayment amount per period per customer Interest paid + Ave. Expenditure = Ave. Repayment, i.e. rb + P = C.. (*)

To Estimate N (cont.) B Br P t t+1 t+n C C C Assume the user pays off the costs in the order they are incurred 1 + r B + P = CN.. ( ) Using (*) and (**), B = C P r N = 1 + r B + P C = B + C C

A Numerical Example m Interchange rate 2% r F Interest rate at which lender can borrow money per period 1% l D LGD 60% P Average purchase per period 51 C Average repayment per period 60 Using the above parameters and the equations listed before, we can find the expected profit and the corresponding hazard rate: r p (p ) 12 E(r) 3% 0.969 0.687 2.084 2% 0.983 0.817 1.783 4% 0.957 0.590 2.040

With a Tran/Rev Scorecard If the interest rate offered on credit cards is r, the corresponding expected monthly profit for the lender is: E(r) = dt 1 p R (t) e(r, p) q r, p f p, t dp

Risk and Take Function Same take function q r, p = Max{0, 3 10r 2p} Population s hazard risk distribution 0 p < 0.5 2p 2 2p + 0.5 0.5 p < 1,2p 1 > t F p, t = 2tp t 0.5t 2 0.5 p < 1, 2p 1 t 1 p = 1, t = 1 Percentage of transactors 1 t = tdt f(p, t) dp = 2/3 0 0 1

The Expected Profit: e(p R, t) t: the transactor score p R : the Good hazard rate from the Revolver Good/Bad scorecard e p R, t = t (Interchange fee) + 1 t [Interchange fee Average Purchase + P(Not Default in N period) (Repayment in N period) +P Default in N period Recovery via Collection ] Given an interest rate, find the optimal cut-off probability by e p R, t = 0 p R = (1 + r F ) l D (1 + r) N R 1 tp T 1 m 1 + 1 m + l D 1 (1 t)p T 1 + r F l D 1/N R

With a Tran/Rev Scorecard N: average number of periods before a purchase is paid off B: average balance carried over per period per customer P: average amount purchased per period per customer C: average repayment amount per period per customer Revolvers Transactors All users rb R + P R = C R 1 + r B R + P R = C R N R B T = 0 C T = P T N T = 1 P = P T P T + 1 P T P R, C = P T C T + 1 P T C R, B = 1 P T B R, N = αn R + (1 α) where α = C R (1 P T ) C T P T +C R (1 P T )

The Numerical Example with Tran/Rev Split P Average purchase per period 51 C Average repayment per period 60 P(T) Percentage of transactors 2/3 P T P for Transactor 72 C T C for Transactor 72 P R P for Revolver 9 C R C for Revolver 36 p R (t): the optimal cut-off corresponding to transactor score t r t E(r) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 3% 0.960 0.959 0.957 0.956 0.953 0.950 0.943 0.929 0.839 0.000 0.000 0.330 4% 0.924 0.922 0.919 0.915 0.909 0.898 0.872 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.399 2% 0.982 0.981 0.980 0.979 0.977 0.975 0.971 0.963 0.940 0.000 0.000 0.311

Conclusion & Possible Extensions Build a scorecard to estimate P(T x) How to use the score in profitability modelling The model with Tran/Rev: acknowledge the profitability of Transactors so that the estimation on profitability is more accurate and offer a different price Use it for Churn prediction?

Thank you