INTRODUCTION The 5-Year District Facilities Work Program is a very important document. The Department of Education, Legislature, Governor's Office, Division of Community Planning (growth management), local governments, and others use the work program information for various needs including funding, planning, and as the authoritative source for school facilities related information. The district's facilities work program must be a complete, balanced capital outlay plan that is financially feasible. The first year of the work program is the districts capital outlay budget. To determine if the work program is balanced and financially feasible, the "Net Available Revenue" minus the "Funded Projects Costs" should sum to zero for "Remaining Funds". If the "Remaining Funds" balance is zero, then the plan is both balanced and financially feasible. If the "Remaining Funds" balance is negative, then the plan is neither balanced nor feasible. If the "Remaining Funds" balance is greater than zero, the plan may be feasible, but it is not balanced. Summary of revenue/expenditures available for new construction and remodeling projects only. 2016-2017 Five Year Revenues Project Costs Difference (Remaining Funds) $500,316 $654,107 $771,482 $884,109 $933,121 $3,743,135 $480,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $480,000 $20,316 $654,107 $771,482 $884,109 $933,121 $3,263,135 District HENDRY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Fiscal Year Range CERTIFICATION By submitting this electronic document, we certify that all information provided in this 5-year district facilities work program is accurate, all capital outlay resources are fully reported, and the expenditures planned represent a complete and balanced capital outlay plan for the district. The district Superintendent of Schools, Chief Financial Officer, and the School Board have approved the information contained in this 5-year district facilities work program; they certify to the Department of Education, Office of Educational Facilities, that the information contained herein is correct and accurate; they also certify that the plan has been developed in coordination with the general purpose local governments as required by 1013.35(2) F.S. We understand that any information contained in this 5-year district facilities work program is subject to audit by the Auditor General of the State of Florida. Date of School Board Adoption 11/7/2016 Work Plan Submittal Date 11/9/2016 DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER DISTRICT POINT-OF-CONTACT PERSON JOB TITLE Paul Puletti Michael Yanosik Kevin McCarthy Director of Facilities, Maintenance & Transportation PHONE NUMBER 863-674-4184 E-MAIL ADDRESS mccarthyk@hendry-schools.net Page 1 of 16
Expenditures Expenditure for Maintenance, Repair and Renovation from 1.50-Mills and PECO Annually, prior to the adoption of the district school budget, each school board must prepare a tentative district facilities work program that includes a schedule of major repair and renovation projects necessary to maintain the educational and ancillary facilities of the district. Item 2016-2017 Actual Budget HVAC Flooring Roofing Safety to Life Fencing Parking Electrical Fire Alarm Telephone/Intercom System Closed Circuit Television Paint Maintenance/Repair $2,741,886 $2,736,886 $2,736,886 $2,753,237 $2,812,915 $13,781,810 Locations: CENTRAL ELEMENTARY, CLEWISTON ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES, CLEWISTON MIDDLE, CLEWISTON SENIOR HIGH, CLEWISTON TRANSPORTATION, CLEWISTON YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY, COUNTRY OAKS ELEMENTARY, EASTSIDE ELEMENTARY, EDWARD A UPTHEGROVE ELEMENTARY, LA BELLE ELEMENTARY, LA BELLE SENIOR HIGH, LA BELLE WAREHOUSE (PRINT SHOP, MAINT, & TRANS), LABELLE MIDDLE, LABELLE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY, SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE(ANNEX), SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE(COURTHOUSE), WESTSIDE ELEMENTARY Sub : $2,741,886 $2,736,886 $2,736,886 $2,753,237 $2,812,915 $13,781,810 Page 2 of 16
PECO Maintenance Expenditures $283,891 $283,891 $283,891 $291,508 $297,088 $1,440,269 1.50 Mill Sub : $2,457,995 $2,452,995 $2,452,995 $2,461,729 $2,515,827 $12,341,541 No items have been specified. : $2,741,886 $2,736,886 $2,736,886 $2,753,237 $2,812,915 $13,781,810 Local 1.50 Mill Expenditure For Maintenance, Repair and Renovation Anticipated expenditures expected from local funding sources over the years covered by the current work plan. Item 2016-2017 Actual Budget Remaining Maint and Repair from 1.5 Mills $2,457,995 $2,452,995 $2,452,995 $2,461,729 $2,515,827 $12,341,541 Maintenance/Repair Salaries School Bus Purchases $440,000 $440,000 $440,000 $440,000 $440,000 $2,200,000 Other Vehicle Purchases $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $50,000 $170,000 Capital Outlay Equipment $199,500 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $999,500 Rent/Lease Payments COP Debt Service Rent/Lease Relocatables Environmental Problems s.1011.14 Debt Service $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $200,000 Special Facilities Construction Account Premiums for Property Casualty Insurance - 1011.71 (4a,b) Qualified School Construction Bonds (QSCB) Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB) $158,053 $158,053 $158,053 $158,053 $158,053 $790,265 purchase Modulars $320,000 $280,000 $280,000 $280,000 $280,000 $1,440,000 Local Expenditure s: $3,645,548 $3,601,048 $3,601,048 $3,609,782 $3,683,880 $18,141,306 Revenue 1.50 Mill Revenue Source Schedule of Estimated Capital Outlay Revenue from each currently approved source which is estimated to be available for expenditures on the projects included in the tentative district facilities work program. All amounts are NET after considering carryover balances, interest earned, new COP's, 1011.14 and 1011.15 loans, etc. Districts cannot use 1.5-Mill funds for salaries except for those explicitly associated with maintenance/repair projects. (1011.71 (5), F.S.) Page 3 of 16
(1) Non-exempt property assessed valuation Item Fund 2016-2017 Actual Value (2) The Millage projected for discretionary capital outlay per s.1011.71 (3) Full value of the 1.50-Mill discretionary capital outlay per s.1011.71 (4) Value of the portion of the 1.50 -Mill ACTUALLY levied $1,970,091,948 $2,045,988,351 $2,127,498,289 $2,211,777,111 $2,297,269,824 $10,652,625,523 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 $3,309,754 $3,437,260 $3,574,197 $3,715,786 $3,859,413 $17,896,410 370 $2,836,932 $2,946,223 $3,063,598 $3,184,959 $3,308,069 $15,339,781 (5) Difference of lines (3) and (4) $472,822 $491,037 $510,599 $530,827 $551,344 $2,556,629 PECO Revenue Source The figure in the row designated "PECO Maintenance" will be subtracted from funds available for new construction because PECO maintenance dollars cannot be used for new construction. Item Fund 2016-2017 Actual Budget PECO New Construction 340 PECO Maintenance Expenditures $283,891 $283,891 $283,891 $291,508 $297,088 $1,440,269 $283,891 $283,891 $283,891 $291,508 $297,088 $1,440,269 CO & DS Revenue Source Revenue from Capital Outlay and Debt Service funds. CO & DS Cash Flow-through Distributed CO & DS Interest on Undistributed CO Item Fund 2016-2017 Actual Budget 360 $58,257 $58,257 $58,257 $58,257 $58,257 $291,285 360 $2,235 $2,235 $2,235 $2,235 $2,235 $11,175 $60,492 $60,492 $60,492 $60,492 $60,492 $302,460 Fair Share Revenue Source All legally binding commitments for proportionate fair-share mitigation for impacts on public school facilities must be included in the 5-year district work program. Sales Surtax Referendum Specific information about any referendum for a 1-cent or ½-cent surtax referendum during the previous year. Page 4 of 16
Did the school district hold a surtax referendum during the past fiscal year 2015-2016? No Additional Revenue Source Any additional revenue sources Proceeds from a s.1011.14/15 F.S. Loans District Bonds - Voted local bond referendum proceeds per s.9, Art VII State Constitution Proceeds from Special Act Bonds Estimated Revenue from CO & DS Bond Sale Proceeds from Voted Capital Improvements millage Federal Grants Proportionate share mitigation (actual cash revenue only, not in kind donations) Impact fees received Private donations Grants from local governments or not-forprofit organizations General Capital Outlay Obligated Fund Balance Carried Forward From Fund Balance Carried Forward Interest, Including Profit On Investment Revenue from Bonds pledging proceeds from 1 cent or 1/2 cent Sales Surtax Other Revenue for Other Capital Projects Proceeds from 1/2 cent sales surtax authorized by school board Proceeds from local governmental infrastructure sales surtax Proceeds from Certificates of Participation (COP's) Sale Item 2016-2017 Actual Value First Bond proceeds amount authorized in FY 1997-98 for Kids District Equity Recognition Fund Balance Carried Forward $1,248,440 $1,248,440 $1,248,440 $1,248,440 $1,248,440 $6,242,200 Special Facilities Construction Account One Cent - 1/2 Cent Sales Surtax Debt Service From Fund Balance Carried Forward Page 5 of 16
Capital Outlay Projects Funds Balance Carried Forward From Fund Balance Carried Forward Subtotal $1,248,440 $1,248,440 $1,248,440 $1,248,440 $1,248,440 $6,242,200 Revenue Summary Item Name 2016-2017 Budget Local 1.5 Mill Discretionary Capital Outlay Revenue Five Year $2,836,932 $2,946,223 $3,063,598 $3,184,959 $3,308,069 $15,339,781 PECO and 1.5 Mill Maint and Other 1.5 Mill Expenditures ($3,645,548) ($3,601,048) ($3,601,048) ($3,609,782) ($3,683,880) ($18,141,306) PECO Maintenance Revenue $283,891 $283,891 $283,891 $291,508 $297,088 $1,440,269 Available 1.50 Mill for New Construction ($808,616) ($654,825) ($537,450) ($424,823) ($375,811) ($2,801,525) Item Name 2016-2017 Budget Five Year CO & DS Revenue $60,492 $60,492 $60,492 $60,492 $60,492 $302,460 PECO New Construction Revenue Other/Additional Revenue $1,248,440 $1,248,440 $1,248,440 $1,248,440 $1,248,440 $6,242,200 Additional Revenue $1,308,932 $1,308,932 $1,308,932 $1,308,932 $1,308,932 $6,544,660 Available Revenue $500,316 $654,107 $771,482 $884,109 $933,121 $3,743,135 Project Schedules Capacity Project Schedules A schedule of capital outlay projects necessary to ensure the availability of satisfactory classrooms for the projected student enrollment in K-12 programs. Project Description Location 2016-2017 Funded Modular Classroom CENTRAL ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Yes Student Stations: 25 0 0 0 0 25 : 1 0 0 0 0 1 Gross Sq Ft: 960 0 0 0 0 960 Page 6 of 16
Modular Classroom EDWARD A UPTHEGROVE ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Yes Student Stations: 25 0 0 0 0 25 : 1 0 0 0 0 1 Gross Sq Ft: 960 0 0 0 0 960 Modular Classsrooms LA BELLE SENIOR HIGH Planned Cost: $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 Yes Student Stations: 50 0 0 0 0 50 : 2 0 0 0 0 2 Gross Sq Ft: 1,920 0 0 0 0 1,920 CLEWISTON SENIOR HIGH Planned Cost: $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 Yes Student Stations: 50 0 0 0 0 50 : 2 0 0 0 0 2 Gross Sq Ft: 1,920 0 0 0 0 1,920 Planned Cost: $480,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $480,000 Student Stations: 150 0 0 0 0 150 : 6 0 0 0 0 6 Gross Sq Ft: 5,760 0 0 0 0 5,760 Other Project Schedules Major renovations, remodeling, and additions of capital outlay projects that do not add capacity to schools. Project Description Location 2016-2017 Actual Budget Project description not specified Location not specified No Funded Additional Project Schedules Any projects that are not identified in the last approved educational plant survey. Page 7 of 16
Non Funded Growth Management Project Schedules Schedule indicating which projects, due to planned development, that CANNOT be funded from current revenues projected over the next five years. Page 8 of 16
Tracking Capacity Tracking EDWARD A UPTHEGROVE ELEMENTARY CLEWISTON MIDDLE 1,119 1,007 704 49 14 70.00 % 0 0 756 75.00 % 15 WESTSIDE ELEMENTARY EASTSIDE ELEMENTARY LA BELLE SENIOR HIGH 1,557 1,479 1,119 62 18 76.00 % 50 2 1,197 78.00 % 19 COUNTRY OAKS ELEMENTARY Location 2016-2017 Satis. Stu. Sta. CLEWISTON SENIOR HIGH Actual 2016-2017 FISH Capacity Actual 2015-2016 COFTE # Class Rooms Actual Average 2016-2017 Class Size Actual 2016-2017 Utilization New Stu. Capacity New Rooms to be Added/Re moved 2020-2021 COFTE 2020-2021 Utilization 2020-2021 Class Size 619 619 482 33 15 78.00 % 25 1 475 74.00 % 14 LA BELLE ELEMENTARY 840 840 515 42 12 61.00 % 0 0 487 58.00 % 12 632 632 610 36 17 96.00 % 0 0 551 87.00 % 15 780 780 583 38 15 75.00 % 0 0 565 72.00 % 15 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 780 780 563 42 13 72.00 % 25 1 541 67.00 % 13 988 988 752 53 14 76.00 % 0 0 770 78.00 % 15 1,106 940 921 48 19 98.00 % 50 2 971 98.00 % 19 LABELLE MIDDLE 1,038 934 785 46 17 84.00 % 0 0 794 85.00 % 17 CLEWISTON YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY LABELLE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY 72 72 14 4 4 20.00 % 0 0 3 4.00 % 1 120 120 17 6 3 14.00 % 0 0 19 16.00 % 3 9,651 9,191 7,066 459 15 76.88 % 150 6 7,129 76.32 % 15 The COFTE (7,129) for must match the Official Forecasted COFTE (7,129 ) for before this section can be completed. In the event that the COFTE does not match the Official forecasted COFTE, then the Balanced COFTE Table should be used to balance COFTE. COFTE for Elementary (PK-3) 2,067 Grade Level Type Balanced COFTE for Middle (4-8) 2,769 High (9-12) 2,293 7,129 Elementary (PK-3) 0 Middle (4-8) 0 High (9-12) 0 7,129 Page 9 of 16
Relocatable Replacement Number of relocatable classrooms clearly identified and scheduled for replacement in the school board adopted financially feasible 5-year district work program. Location 2016-2017 Year 5 EDWARD A UPTHEGROVE ELEMENTARY 1 0 0 1 0 2 WESTSIDE ELEMENTARY 0 0 2 1 1 4 EASTSIDE ELEMENTARY 0 0 1 0 0 1 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 1 2 0 0 0 3 LA BELLE SENIOR HIGH 2 2 0 1 1 6 COUNTRY OAKS ELEMENTARY 0 0 1 1 2 4 Relocatable Replacements: 4 4 4 4 4 20 Charter Schools Tracking Information regarding the use of charter schools. Special Purpose Tracking The number of classrooms that will be used for certain special purposes in the current year, by facility and type of classroom, that the district will, 1), not use for educational purposes, and 2), the co-teaching classrooms that are not open plan classrooms and will be used for educational purposes. School School Type # of Elementary K-3 # of Middle 4-8 # of High 9-12 # of ESE # of Combo Educational : 0 0 0 0 0 0 School School Type # of Elementary K-3 # of Middle 4-8 # of High 9-12 # of ESE # of Combo Co-Teaching : 0 0 0 0 0 0 Infrastructure Tracking Necessary offsite infrastructure requirements resulting from expansions or new schools. This section should include infrastructure information related to capacity project schedules and other project schedules (Section 4). None Page 10 of 16
Proposed location of planned facilities, whether those locations are consistent with the comprehensive plans of all affected local governments, and recommendations for infrastructure and other improvements to land adjacent to existing facilities. Provisions of 1013.33(12), (13) and (14) and 1013.36 must be addressed for new facilities planned within the 1st three years of the plan (Section 5). None Consistent with Comp Plan? Yes Net New The number of classrooms, by grade level and type of construction, that were added during the last fiscal year. List the net new classrooms added in the 2015-2016 fiscal year. "" is defined as capacity carrying classrooms that are added to increase capacity to enable the district to meet the Class Size Amendment. List the net new classrooms to be added in the 2016-2017 fiscal year. s for fiscal year 2016-2017 should match totals in Section 15A. Location 2015-2016 # Permanent 2015-2016 # Modular 2015-2016 # Relocatable 2015-2016 2016-2017 # Permanent 2016-2017 # Modular 2016-2017 # Relocatable 2016-2017 Elementary (PK-3) 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Middle (4-8) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 High (9-12) 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 6 Relocatable Student Stations Number of students that will be educated in relocatable units, by school, in the current year, and the projected number of students for each of the years in the workplan. Site 2016-2017 5 Year Average CLEWISTON MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 LA BELLE ELEMENTARY 181 341 341 341 341 309 WESTSIDE ELEMENTARY 61 61 61 61 61 61 EASTSIDE ELEMENTARY 126 126 126 126 126 126 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 94 94 94 94 94 94 LA BELLE SENIOR HIGH 100 100 100 100 100 100 LABELLE MIDDLE 18 0 0 0 0 4 CLEWISTON YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABELLE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY 95 60 60 60 60 67 EDWARD A UPTHEGROVE ELEMENTARY 22 156 156 156 156 129 COUNTRY OAKS ELEMENTARY 116 138 138 138 138 134 CLEWISTON SENIOR HIGH 0 85 85 85 85 68 Page 11 of 16
s for HENDRY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT students in relocatables by year. 813 1,161 1,161 1,161 1,161 1,091 number of COFTE students projected by year. 7,130 7,164 7,198 7,139 7,129 7,152 Percent in relocatables by year. 11 % 16 % 16 % 16 % 16 % 15 % Leased Facilities Tracking Exising leased facilities and plans for the acquisition of leased facilities, including the number of classrooms and student stations, as reported in the educational plant survey, that are planned in that location at the end of the five year workplan. Location # of Leased 2016-2017 FISH Student Stations Owner # of Leased 2020-2021 FISH Student Stations EDWARD A UPTHEGROVE ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 CLEWISTON MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 LA BELLE ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 WESTSIDE ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 EASTSIDE ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 LA BELLE SENIOR HIGH 0 0 0 0 COUNTRY OAKS ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 CLEWISTON SENIOR HIGH 0 0 0 0 LABELLE MIDDLE 0 0 0 0 CLEWISTON YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY 0 0 0 0 LABELLE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Failed Standard Relocatable Tracking Relocatable units currently reported by school, from FISH, and the number of relocatable units identified as Failed Standards. Planning Page 12 of 16
Class Size Reduction Planning Plans approved by the school board that reduce the need for permanent student stations such as acceptable school capacity levels, redistricting, busing, year-round schools, charter schools, magnet schools, public-private partnerships, multitrack scheduling, grade level organization, block scheduling, or other alternatives. The district is considering redistricting,grade level reconfiguration,and block scheduling. School Closure Planning Plans for the closure of any school, including plans for disposition of the facility or usage of facility space, and anticipated revenues. None Page 13 of 16
Long Range Planning Ten-Year Maintenance District projects and locations regarding the projected need for major renovation, repair, and maintenance projects within the district in years 6-10 beyond the projects plans detailed in the five years covered by the work plan. Ten-Year Capacity Schedule of capital outlay projects projected to ensure the availability of satisfactory student stations for the projected student enrollment in K-12 programs for the future 5 years beyond the 5-year district facilities work program. Ten-Year Planned Utilization Schedule of planned capital outlay projects identifying the standard grade groupings, capacities, and planned utilization rates of future educational facilities of the district for both permanent and relocatable facilities. Grade Level Projections FISH Student Stations Elementary - District s Actual 2015-2016 FISH Capacity Actual 2015-2016 COFTE Actual 2015-2016 Utilization Actual 2016-2017 / 2025-2026 new Student Capacity to be added/removed 2025-2026 COFTE 2025-2026 Utilization 4,639 4,639 3,505.22 75.56 % 0 3,505 75.56 % Middle - District s 2,157 1,941 1,489.03 76.71 % 0 1,489 76.71 % High - District s 2,663 2,419 2,040.81 84.37 % 0 2,040 84.33 % Other - ESE, etc 192 192 31.37 16.15 % 0 32 16.67 % 9,651 9,191 7,066.43 76.88 % 0 7,066 76.88 % Combination schools are included with the middle schools for student stations, capacity, COFTE and utilization purposes because these facilities all have a 90% utilization factor. Use this space to explain or define the grade groupings for combination schools. No comments to report. Page 14 of 16
Ten-Year Infrastructure Planning Proposed Location of Planned New, Remodeled, or New Additions to Facilities in 06 thru 10 out years (Section 28). None Plans for closure of any school, including plans for disposition of the facility or usage of facility space, and anticipated revenues in the 06 thru 10 out years (Section 29). None Twenty-Year Maintenance District projects and locations regarding the projected need for major renovation, repair, and maintenance projects within the district in years 11-20 beyond the projects plans detailed in the five years covered by the work plan. Twenty-Year Capacity Schedule of capital outlay projects projected to ensure the availability of satisfactory student stations for the projected student enrollment in K-12 programs for the future 11-20 years beyond the 5-year district facilities work program. Twenty-Year Planned Utilization Schedule of planned capital outlay projects identifying the standard grade groupings, capacities, and planned utilization rates of future educational facilities of the district for both permanent and relocatable facilities. Grade Level Projections FISH Student Stations Elementary - District s Actual 2015-2016 FISH Capacity Actual 2015-2016 COFTE Actual 2015-2016 Utilization Actual 2016-2017 / 2035-2036 new Student Capacity to be added/removed 2035-2036 COFTE 2035-2036 Utilization 4,639 4,639 3,505.22 75.56 % 0 3,505 75.56 % Middle - District s 2,157 1,941 1,489.03 76.71 % 0 1,490 76.76 % High - District s 2,663 2,419 2,040.81 84.37 % 0 2,040 84.33 % Other - ESE, etc 192 192 31.37 16.15 % 0 32 16.67 % 9,651 9,191 7,066.43 76.88 % 0 7,067 76.89 % Page 15 of 16
Combination schools are included with the middle schools for student stations, capacity, COFTE and utilization purposes because these facilities all have a 90% utilization factor. Use this space to explain or define the grade groupings for combination schools. No comments to report. Twenty-Year Infrastructure Planning Proposed Location of Planned New, Remodeled, or New Additions to Facilities in 11 thru 20 out years (Section 28). None Plans for closure of any school, including plans for disposition of the facility or usage of facility space, and anticipated revenues in the 11 thru 20 out years (Section 29). None Page 16 of 16