Reference Point April 2016

Similar documents
Reference Point. Auto Solutions >33% Auto-Enrollment Stays Strong Insights. of plans have a default deferral rate of 6%

Data can inspire plan changes

Reference Point April 2016

Data can inspire plan changes

Redefining the digital generation. WORKING MILLENNIALS ARE SAVERS AND WORTH YOUR ATTENTION.

Empowering employees with Advice Access

Getting Beyond Ordinary MANAGING PLAN COSTS IN AUTOMATIC PROGRAMS

How Plan Sponsors of Larger 401(k) Plans Are Aiming for Retirement Preparedness: A Human Resources Perspective

Plan Sponsor Report. Page 1 of 14

Workplace Insights. 401(k) Wellness Scorecard. Key findings. For quarter ending September 30, 2013

Lifetime Income Score

Automatic enrollment: The power of the default

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN SURVEY RESULTS. February 21, 2005

IMPROVING PARTICIPANT OUTCOMES: AN ACTION PLAN FOR PLAN SPONSORS

Bridging the gap between 401(k) sponsors and participants. Turning differing views about retirement planning into shared solutions

Milliken Retirement Plan Safe Harbor Plan Changes Overview

Millennial, Gen X, and Baby Boomer Workers and Retirees RETIREMENT SAVING & SPENDING STUDY

MEASURING UP. Best practices in benchmarking 403(b) plans

Riding the Retirement Pipeline. Presented By: Jefferson D. Cheshier

403(b) PLAN. Employee Guidebook. Welcome Building retirement savings Options for investing You have control Open your account CONTENTS

Post-Modern Asset Management: The Credit Crisis and Beyond. Defined Contribution Plans by David Embry

Participant Preferences in Target Date Funds: An Update

Improving the Target Date Fund Selection

A Compendium of Findings About American Employers 15 th Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey. April 2015 TCRS

Getting Beyond Ordinary MANAGING PLAN COSTS IN AUTOMATIC PROGRAMS

How To Encourage Employees To Save For Retirement

PHILADELPHIA GAS WORKS 457 and 401(a) Retirement Plans Recordkeeper RFP#30174 Questions & Answers December 7, 2015

Measuring Retirement Plan Effectiveness

Plan Wellness Scorecard

TIAA-CREF Investing in You Survey Executive Summary. August 12, 2014

ESSENTIALS OF A MORE SECURE RETIREMENT

Auto Enrollment in 401(k) and 403(b) Plans: Can one solution fit every plan s needs?

PERSPECTIVES ON RETIREMENT

Retirement Readiness: Maximizing your retirement savings program

Guide to. Auto-enrolment

Making Defined Contribution Plans More Effective

Brand Name Recognition and Participant-Friendly Provisions

Boosting 401(k) Retirement Readiness

Workplace INSIGHTS TM

A Healthy Retirement Plan Helps Promote a Healthy Company: How to Get There

PLANavigator. Presented by: Joel Shapiro, J.D., LL.M. ERISA Compliance

Auto Services and Behavioral Economics

ASSESSING AMERICANS FINANCIAL AND RETIREMENT SECURITY

TIAA 2017 Lifetime Income Survey executive summary

The power of plan wellness

Fees, Plan Design, & Participant Success Measures

Sage-SAGE Business Cases

Prudential Retirement s Fifth Annual Workplace Report on Retirement Planning

THE EASE OF AUTOMATION AND GUARANTEED LIFETIME INCOME. What participants want from their defined contribution retirement plans

15 October 2012 UNISON response to the Mutuality within USS The scheme s admission terms and their role in scheme mutuality consultation document

LIFT RETIREMENT NEWS AND INFORMATION FOR EMPLOYERS Q Chuck Furr, CFP, AIF 1201 Battleground Avenue Suite 200 Greensboro, NC 27408

Deferred Compensation Plan

Auto-enrolment made simple. Auto-enrolment aims to increase the level of retirement saving through the workplace and affects every employer in the UK.

The Royal Mail Defined Contribution Plan Automatic enrolment

Higher Education Retirement Decision Guide

Retirement Plans in Construction

Lincoln Retirement Power

Investing done differently FOR FINANCIAL PROFESSIONAL AND PLAN SPONSOR USE ONLY. NOT FOR USE WITH EMPLOYEES.

PROMOTING PLAN SUCCESS

The Impact of the Default Investment Decision on Participant Deferral Rates: Managed Accounts vs Target-Date Funds

Deep Experience. THOUGHTFUL INNOVATION. Target date solutions from T. Rowe Price

Deep Experience. THOUGHTFUL INNOVATION. Target date solutions from T. Rowe Price

International Defined Contribution Update

DCIIA Fourth Biennial Plan Sponsor Survey

Emerging from the Economic Storm:

RETIREMENT SAVINGS STRATEGIES

GUARANTEED LIFETIME INCOME

Automatic 401(k) Best Practices: What Works and Why. Presentation by: Pete Chandler FINRA, Investor Education

10 Years Later THE PENSION PROTECTION ACT S IMPACT ON DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS

The Financial Engines National 401(k) Evaluation. Who benefits from today s 401(k)?

The Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program. Compiled by the Office of the Illinois State Treasurer Treasurer Michael W. Frerichs

Make the most of an annual plan review

Introduction to Defined Contribution Plans

Deep Experience. THOUGHTFUL INNOVATION. Target date solutions from T. Rowe Price

Invest now to help make your retirement dreams a reality

JOHNSON & JOHNSON SAVINGS PLAN

Closing the Gap Between Belief and Behavior

WRITTEN TESTIMONY SUBMITTED BY LORI LUCAS EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT CALLAN ASSOCIATES

Boost workplace retirement savings through simplified enrolment

Investing Essentials. Your dreams are too important to leave to chance

Benefit Insights. Retirement Plan Rx

Rethinking the Pension Freeze

3.6TRN 4 UK INSTITUTIONAL CLIENT MARKET KEY FINDINGS

Golden rules of communication. Talking about pensions with a new generation of savers

The 14 th Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey: The Employer s Perspective

A Retirement Security Retrospective: 2007 Versus 2017 Select Findings from the Transamerica Annual Retirement Survey

Opting out of Retirement Plan Default Settings

THE EASE OF AUTOMATION AND GUARANTEED LIFETIME INCOME

Financial Planning on Tight Budgets

Power your practice with financial wellness

Service Models: Tools for Improving Outcomes. Diana Jordan, AIFA Director, Client Experience Unified Trust Company, N.A.

Retirement and Investment Webinar Series

Making the Most of Your Match

Pension information sheet

Defined Contribution and Defined Benefit Plans: Have you considered everything?

Using Lessons from Behavioral Finance for Better Retirement Plan Design

WORKPLACE PENSIONS REPORT

STO RFI #13-01 SB 1234/ California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program. Section I California Secure Choice Request for Information

Adding Automatic Features to your 401(k) Retirement Plan

Leveraging Engagement to Maximize Cross-Selling Opportunities. Generate new income and deepen existing relationships

Transcription:

April 16 T. Rowe Price Defined Contribution Plan Data As of December 31, 15 Insights The Pension Protection Act of 6 provided fiduciary cover for plans using automatic enrollment and escalation. Ten years have gone by, and the change to the 1(k) landscape has certainly been affected. AN EFFECTIVE WAY TO GET PARTICIPANTS STARTED Participants must enroll to make contributions to their retirement plan account. Auto-enrollment is an effective way to encourage participants to save participation in auto-enrolled plans is percentage points higher than in plans without that feature. Since smaller plans with assets under $5 million may be less likely to use auto-enrollment due to perceived costs, their participation rates are much lower. The value of auto-enrollment is clearly demonstrated when looking at participants under the age of 3. When auto-enrolled, participants in the under- years and - to 29-year year age groups participate at significantly higher percentages (76% and 84%, respectively) than those that are not auto-enrolled (3% and 3%, respectively). These participants often referred to as the millennial generation are eager to save. Results from our proprietary study on millennials told us that 74% are more comfortable saving and investing extra money than spending it. 1 Employers should take advantage of this positive savings perspective and explore the effect that auto-enrollment and auto-increase may have on their participants ability to save. HIGHER DEFAULT RATES AND AUTO-INCREASE MAXIMIZE SAVINGS POTENTIAL While enrollment rates are up sharply, most participants are not contributing enough to prepare for a comfortable retirement. Industry experts suggest saving 15% of your income for retirement. As a result, companies are rethinking the traditional 3% default rate in fact, 3.2% of companies adopted a 6% or higher default deferral rate by the end of 15. This represents a fundamental shift and acknowledgement that 3% default deferral rates will not provide enough savings for an adequate retirement. The industry can support this trend by encouraging sponsors to adopt higher default rates as emphasis swings from simply enrolling participants to actively encouraging a 15% savings rate. A consistent comment we receive when we survey clients is a desire for their participants to save more. Since many participants are reluctant to increase their deferral rate only 38% did in 15 sponsors should consider incorporating auto-increase into their plans. This feature automatically raises deferral rates in small increments each year to guide participants toward the suggested 15% rate something participants are more likely to tolerate. Results show that most participants will not opt out of this increase. Plan Sponsors should consider offering auto-increase as an opt-out feature since this produces a six-times-higher adoption rate than using opt in. 1 T. Rowe Price Millennial Retirement Saving and Spending Study, 15. POTENTIAL STRATEGIES Add auto-enrollment to get participants saving early Maximize participants savings potential through opt-out auto-increase up to 15% Want to learn more? Contact your T. Rowe Price representative. Visit troweprice.com/referencepoint 1

April 16 No. 1 AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT DESIGN TRENDS Default auto-enrollment rate 11 12 13 14 15 1% 1.6% 1.8% 1.8% 2.% 2.4% 2% 7.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 5.3 3% 49.7 47.3 45.6 42.9 38.2 4% 13.7 14.2 15. 15. 13. 5% 1.8 11.7 1.8 1.1 1.9 6% or more 16.9 18.7.4 23.6 3.2 Auto-enrollment feature not offered.2 56.1 52.8 48.7 48.9 Default auto-increase rate 1% 63.5% 66.3% 69.% 69.6% 73.6% 2% 36.5 33.8 31. 3.4 26.4 Auto-increase feature not offered 36.7 36.5 32.2 3. 3.7 Default investment Target-date investment 95.5% 95.5% 95.5% 96.% 95.9% Other investment* 4.5 4.5 4.5 4. 4.1 * Other investments could include balanced, money market or stable value funds. Note: Results for auto-enrollment and auto-increase are based on those plans that offer that feature. No. 2 DEFAULT DEFERRAL RATE FOR AUTO-ENROLLMENT PLANS % 38.2% 3 29.% 1 13.% 1.9% 5.3% 2.4% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6%.3%.9% 7% 8% DEFAULT AUTO-ENROLLMENT RATE 15 saw a positive trend toward more employers setting default deferral rate at 6% versus 3%. Visit troweprice.com/referencepoint 2

April 16 No. 3 PERCENTAGE OF PLANS ADOPTING AUTO-INCREASE AND AUTO-ENROLLMENT 8% 67.8% 7.% 69.3% 63.3% 63.5% 51.3% 51.1% 43.9% 47.2% 39.8% 11 12 13 14 15 Auto-Increase Auto-Enrollment The percentage of eligible plans using auto-increase and auto-enrollment remained steady in 15 at 69.3% and 51.1%, respectively. No. 4 8% PARTICIPANT ADOPTION RATE BASED ON AUTO-INCREASE ADOPTION METHOD 69% 66% 65% 1% 11% 11% 13 14 15 Opt-Out, Adoption Method Used Opt-In, Adoption Method Used We continue to see significantly higher use of autoincrease by participants when they are asked to opt out, a 54-percentage-point improvement in use. Visit troweprice.com/referencepoint 3

April 16 No. 5 PARTICIPATION RATES 8% 7.2% 73.2% 66.1% 73.5% 68.1% 72.9% 68.3% 72.6% 66.2% 74.5% 68.% 75.8% 69.5% 76.% 69.9% 74.% 66.5%.9% 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Plan Weighted Participant Weighted No. 6 1% PARTICIPATION COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTO-ENROLLMENT AND NON-AUTO-ENROLLMENT PLANS 87% 86% 88% 8 52% 49% 48% 13 14 15 Auto-Enrollment Plans Non-Auto-Enrollment Plans Participation rates continue to be strongly tied to the adoption of auto-enrollment; auto-enrollment plans saw a full points higher participation rate than non-autoenrollment plans. Visit troweprice.com/referencepoint 4

April 16 No. 7 PARTICIPATION RATE COMPARISON BY AGE AUTO-ENROLLMENT PLANS VS. NON-AUTO-ENROLLMENT PLANS 1% 88.5% 89.5% 9.2% 89.1% 87.8% 84.4% 85.7% 8 75.7% 74.6% 51.4% 55.% 56.7% 54.3% 46.3% 47.6% 3.4% 3.1% 3.1% < 29 3 39 49 5 59 64 65 69 7+ 15 TRP Total Auto-Enrollment Plans Rate Non-Auto-Enrollment Plans Rate Age groups in their prime working years (ages 3 to ) who are in auto-enrolled plans are showing a greater than 3-percentage-points increase in the participation rate compared with the same age groups in non-auto-enrolled plans. Visit troweprice.com/referencepoint 5

April 16 No. 8 TOTAL PARTICIPATION RATE (AUTO-ENROLLMENT AND NON-AUTO-ENROLLMENT PLANS) BY AGE < 29 3 39 49 5 59 64 65 69 7+ 15 TRP Total 36.7% 31.6 31.8 54.4 54. 56.6 7.8 7.6 7. 73.9 73.3 71.8 75.4 74.9 72.7 74. 73.9 7. 68.8 68.5 62.3 53.5 53.6 45.2 68.3 67.8 66.9 1 3 5 7 8% 13 Overall participation rates dropped in 15 to 66.9%, 14 possibly due to concerns over contributing money in 15 an unstable market environment. Visit troweprice.com/referencepoint 6

April 16 No. 9 1% PARTICIPATION RATES BREAKDOWN BY PLAN ASSETS 8 73.1% 79.7% 83.% 69.8% 79.7% 68.8% 59.8%.3% 43.9% 44.9% <$5M $5M $5M $5M $M $M $1B $1B+ Plan Weighted Participant Weighted No. 1 PARTICIPATION RATES BREAKDOWN BY PLAN PARTICIPANT COUNT 8% 78.4% 71.4% 66.2% 65.8% 77.6% 66.8% <1K 1K 5K >5K Plan Weighted Participant Weighted Visit troweprice.com/referencepoint 7

April 16 Methodology Unless otherwise noted, all data included in this report are drawn from the following sources: Data are based on the large-market, full-service universe TRP Total of T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., retirement plans (1(k) and 457 plans), consisting of 662 plans and over 1.6 million participants. Auto-enrollment, auto-increase and default deferral rate results are based on participants of large-market, full-service 1(k) and 457 plans who were automatically enrolled in their plan during 15. Trend results are based on findings at the calendar year-end from 7 15. Participation rates by age are participant weighted (total number of participants divided by the total number eligible to participate). Participant-weighted year-over-year participation rate averages are calculated by dividing the number of participants by the number eligible to participate. The plan-weighted year-over-year participation rate average is the sum of plan level averages divided by the number of plans. The data are based on any participants eligible to make contributions during the period. Participation results are based on all contributions. Participation rates by age are participant weighted (total number of participants divided by the total number eligible to participate). Visit troweprice.com/referencepoint 8 C1BINN44Z 16-AX-17643