FM Benchmarking / KPI

Similar documents
Facilities Management Performance Assessment - Using APPA Facilities Performance Indicators

Business & Financial Services December 2017

WESTWOOD LUTHERAN CHURCH Summary Financial Statement YEAR TO DATE - February 28, Over(Under) Budget WECC Fund Actual Budget

XML Publisher Balance Sheet Vision Operations (USA) Feb-02

THE B E A CH TO WN S O F P ALM B EA CH

The Financial Reporting Checklists Every Firm should be Doing

Spheria Australian Smaller Companies Fund

Financial & Business Highlights For the Year Ended June 30, 2017

Big Walnut Local School District

Executive Summary. July 17, 2015

Common stock prices 1. New York Stock Exchange indexes (Dec. 31,1965=50)2. Transportation. Utility 3. Finance

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

DECEMBER KPI REPORT. Service Provider SLA Performance Core and Non-Core Settlement Systems Core and Non-Core BSC Systems. Supplier Performance

11 May Report.xls Office of Budget & Fiscal Planning

Review of Registered Charites Compliance Rates with Annual Reporting Requirements 2016

OTHER DEPOSITS FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DEPOSIT BARKAT SAVING ACCOUNT

HIPIOWA - IOWA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION Unaudited Balance Sheet As of July 31

HIPIOWA - IOWA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION Unaudited Balance Sheet As of January 31

HUD NSP-1 Reporting Apr 2010 Grantee Report - New Mexico State Program

Performance Report October 2018

Constructing a Cash Flow Forecast

General Fund Revenue

2009 Reassessment As Impacted by Senate Bill 711

Big Walnut Local School District

Unrestricted Cash / Board Designated Cash & Investments December 2015

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, MARCH 21 AT 4 PM

Projections/Estimated - Unrestricted Cash / Board Designated Cash & Investments September 2017

Japan Securities Finance Co.,Ltd

Cost Estimation of a Manufacturing Company

Isle Of Wight half year business confidence report

Review of Membership Developments

PHOENIX ENERGY MARKETING CONSULTANTS INC. HISTORICAL NATURAL GAS & CRUDE OIL PRICES UPDATED TO July, 2018

Factor Leave Accruals. Accruing Vacation and Sick Leave

Fiscal Year 2018 Project 1 Annual Budget

Budget Retreat Financial Status. Presented to Mecklenburg Board of County Commissioners February 20, 2014

Sacramento City College Strategic Planning System

Exam 1 Problem Solving Questions Review

Asset Manager Performance Comparison

QUESTION 2. QUESTION 3 Which one of the following is most indicative of a flexible short-term financial policy?

Asset Manager Performance Comparison

Unrestricted Cash / Board Designated Cash & Investments December 2014

Historical Pricing PJM COMED, Around the Clock. Cal '15 Cal '16 Cal '17 Cal '18 Cal '19 Cal '20 Cal '21 Cal '22

MEDICAID FEDERAL SHARE OF MATCHING FUNDS

Regional overview Gisborne

Historical Pricing PJM PSEG, Around the Clock. Cal '15 Cal '16 Cal '17 Cal '18 Cal '19 Cal '20 Cal '21 Cal '22

Project CONNECT Executive Steering Committee Update. February 26, 2014

ACA Reporting E-File Errors, Penalties & Exchange Notices

Development of Economy and Financial Markets of Kazakhstan

Revenue Estimating Conference Tobacco Tax and Surcharge Executive Summary

Algo Trading System RTM

Sample Charter Financial Month End Report. May 31, 20XX

PRESS RELEASE. Securities issued by Hungarian residents and breakdown by holding sectors. January 2019

Regional overview Hawke's Bay

Division of Bond Finance Interest Rate Calculations. Revenue Estimating Conference Interest Rates Used for Appropriations, including PECO Bond Rates

City of Justin NOVEMBER

Beginning Date: January 2016 End Date: June Managers in Zephyr: Benchmark: Morningstar Short-Term Bond

1.2 The purpose of the Finance Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities related to:

Key IRS Interest Rates After PPA

Beginning Date: January 2016 End Date: September Managers in Zephyr: Benchmark: Morningstar Short-Term Bond

Contents Budget Summary Key Performance Indicators Enrollment Assumptions Revenue and Expense Detail Cash Flow Appendix

Perspective on Colorado s Budget and Economy

Choosing a Cell Phone Plan-Verizon Investigating Linear Equations

Research Accounting & Analysis University of Washington Operational Performance Dashboard

Facilities Management. FM Key Performance Indicators

Status of the Unemployment Trust Fund and Related Issues. Commission on Unemployment Compensation. Ellen Marie Hess, Commissioner.

Six good reasons for choosing DNB in the new banking environment

Pay or Play Penalties Look-back Measurement Method Examples

Economic Activity Index ( GDB-EAI ) For the month of May 2013 G O V E R N M E N T D E V E L O P M E N T B A N K F O R P U E R T O R I C O

Research Accounting & Analysis University of Washington

PRESS RELEASE. Securities issued by Hungarian residents and breakdown by holding sectors. October 2018

Budget Manager Meeting. February 20, 2018

LOUISVILLE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Gas Rates 2018 Monthly Billing Adjustments

Using projections to manage your programs

Financial Report for the Month of SEPTEMBER

University of Houston Student Leadership Forum Budget and Legislative Processes

Please scroll to find the 2018 and 2019 global fund holiday calendars.

Calcom Vision Limited. FY18-19 Q2 (July-Sept 18) Investors Release 29 th October, 2018

2018 Financial Management Classes

FERC EL Settlement Agreement

Effective Budgeting and Cost Control. Contents are subject to change. For the latest updates visit

Mortgage Trends Update

City of Joliet 2014 Revenue Review. October 2013

Distribution Group Study Process. August 26, 2014

PRESS RELEASE. Securities issued by Hungarian residents and breakdown by holding sectors. October 2017

BANK OF GUYANA. BANKING SYSTEM STATISTICAL ABSTRACT Website:

EMPLOYER S MUNICIPAL INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING FORMS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING FORM LW-1

Approve Assure Note. Board of Directors Meeting Report 31 July Agenda item 254/13. Title. Sponsoring Director. Authors.

September 2016 MLS Statistical Report

Affordable Care Act Implementation Alert

Regional overview Auckland

Facilities Management. FM Key Performance Indicators

1 Long Term Debt $ 9,298,554 $ (250,000) $ 9,048, Preferred Stock 30,450 30, % 5 Common Equity 250, %

Projections/Estimated - Unrestricted Cash / Board Designated Cash & Investments March 2018

Ohlone Community College District

PASSENGER REJECTION REDUCTION INITIATIVE KIRK PEREIRA. 24 th April 2018

Ch. 13 Practice Questions Solution

Assessment Method 1: Evaluate users' training needs.

Key IRS Interest Rates After PPA

(Internet version) Financial & Statistical Report November 2018

BANK OF GUYANA. BANKING SYSTEM STATISTICAL ABSTRACT Website:

Transcription:

2014 UT Facilities Conference FM Benchmarking / KPI Dave Riker Associate Vice President for Facilities Belinda Dovalina Director of Business Services June 13, 2014

Proposed Discussion Agenda Metrics versus Key Performance Indicators Value to Facilities Management Sample Key Performance Indicators Strategic KPIs Funding Metrics Communications/ Metrics

GSF 6,000,000 UTSA Facilities & Student Enrollment Growth Student Enrollment 35,000 5,500,000 5,000,000 30,000 4,500,000 25,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 20,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 15,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 10,000 1,000,000 5,000 500,000-1969-1979 1980-1989 1990-1999 2000-2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Forecast GSF Total 1,148,882 1,635,280 2,247,294 3,870,901 3,897,742 3,981,050 4,368,523 4,514,814 4,530,393 4,619,177 5,057,607 5,421,907 Students 7,844 14,534 18,608 27,291 28,739 28,533 28,413 28,955 30,258 30,968 30,727 31,219 -

Value to Facilities Measures with high value to the Facilities organization? Course Correction Adjusting operations to improve schedule performance and quality of results Budget Allocation Communicating budget requirements and demonstrating good stewardship of resources Energy Efficiency Identifying potential energy savings and demonstrating efficiency Other? 4

Preventive Maintenance Schedule Compliance - Tri Campus (Excludes Vehicle Maintenance) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 % Month 98.8% 90.3% 90.5% 93.7% 93.7% 97.5% 94.8% 93.4% 85.1% 80.1% 94.8% 96.8% 93.4% % Average 95.7% 95.3% 95.3% 95.1% 95.0% 95.3% 95.6% 95.5% 94.6% 93.2% 92.9% 92.9% 92.5% Scheduled 1,581 1,788 1,756 1,711 1,557 1,556 1,484 1,646 1,673 1,600 1,718 1,883 1,726 On-Time 1,562 1,615 1,590 1,604 1,459 1,517 1,407 1,537 1,423 1,282 1,629 1,823 1,612 Missed 19 173 166 107 98 39 77 109 250 318 89 60 114

500 Preventive Maintenance Backlog Tri-Campus (Excludes Vehicle Maintenance) 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Backlog 94 258 374 435 410 417 463 340 346 323 105 92 107 Ave Backlog 120 123 134 150 174 199 226 244 266 287 290 288 290

Corrective Maintenance Schedule Compliance - Tri Campus (Excludes Vehicle Maintenance) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 % Month 91.2% 90.7% 88.4% 92.3% 84.7% 85.5% 84.2% 81.7% 82.2% 82.7% 82.5% 85.4% 81.4% % Average 89.6% 89.8% 89.6% 89.7% 89.3% 89.0% 88.5% 87.7% 87.1% 86.8% 86.1% 86.2% 85.6% Completed 1,211 1,286 1,289 1,238 1,172 1,244 1,245 1,407 1,345 992 1,209 1,165 1,037 On-Time 1,104 1,167 1,139 1,143 993 1,064 1,048 1,150 1,106 820 997 995 844 Missed 107 119 150 95 179 180 197 257 239 172 212 170 193

500 Yellow Tag Deficiencies 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 New Tasks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transferred Tasks 465 350 350 321 270 257 165 115 75 45 0 0 0 Yellow Tags 31 29 29 22 20 18 11 9 7 5 0 0 0

MMBTUs per GSF 0.0140 0.0120 0.0100 0.0080 0.0060 0.0040 0.0020 - Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 2014 0.0092 0.0097 0.0103 0.0130 0.0145 0.0119 0.0110 2013 0.0095 0.0096 0.0120 0.0115 0.0134 0.0102 0.0109 0.0108 0.0098 0.0093 0.0100 0.0092 2012 0.0123 0.0104 0.0126 0.0137 0.0135 0.0124 0.0110 0.0106 0.0110 0.0101 0.0105 0.0092

STRATEGIC KPI EXAMPLES (IFMA and APPA Suggested Metrics)

Facilities Condition Index (FCI) History 16% 14% 12% FY13 APPA FPI Survey Average 11.45% Poor 10% 9.0% 8.5% 8.5% 8% 7.0% 6% UTSA FCI 7.0% 6.1% 6.8% 6.7% 7.1% 7.5% Fair 4% 2% Good 0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Data from UT System Facilities Resource Renewal Model

Total Operating Cost Per GSF (excluding Purchased Utilities) $7.00 $6.00 $5.00 APPA Average $5.23 $4.00 UTSA $4.12 $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 $0.00 Building Age Range - - less than 20 Carnegie Class -- Research High Funding -- Public APPA Region -- CAPPA Enrollment Range -- 20,000+ UTSA = $2222,666666,111111 TTTTTTTTTT OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO CCCCCCCC 55,222222,888888 GGGGGG

Maintenance Cost per Gross Square Foot UTSA = $5,349,630 MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO CCCCCCCC 5,252,876 GGGGGG $2.00 $1.80 $1.60 APPA Average $1.63 $1.40 $1.20 $1.00 UTSA $1.02 $0.80 $0.60 $0.40 $0.20 $0.00 Building Age Range - - less than 20 Carnegie Class -- Research High Funding -- Public APPA Region -- CAPPA Enrollment Range -- 20,000+

Ratio of Total Facilities Expenditures to Gross Institutional Expenditures 8.00% UTSA = $2222,666666,111111 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO CCCCCCCC $444444,000000,222222 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO CCCCCCCC 7.00% 6.00% 5.00% 4.00% APPA Average 5.7% UTSA 4.56% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00% 0.00% Building Age Range - - less than 20 Carnegie Class -- Research High Funding -- Public APPA Region -- CAPPA Enrollment Range -- 20,000+

Total Operating Cost per Student Full Time Equivalent UTSA = $2222,666666,111111 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO CCCCCCCC 3333,444444 SSSSSSSSSSSSSS FFFFFF $1,600.00 $1,400.00 APPA Average $1,450.00 $1,200.00 $1,000.00 $800.00 $600.00 UTSA $710.68 $400.00 $200.00 $0.00 Building Age Range -- less than 20 Carnegie Class -- Research High Funding -- Public APPA Region -- CAPPA Enrollment Range -- 20,000+

Average Gross Square Feet per Student FTE UTSA = 55,222222,888888 GGGGGG 3333,444444 SSSSSSSSSSSSSS FFFFFF 400.00 350.00 300.00 APPA Average 299.9 SF 250.00 200.00 150.00 UTSA 172.4 SF 100.00 50.00 0.00 Building Age Range - - less than 20 Carnegie Class -- Research High Funding -- Public APPA Region -- CAPPA Enrollment Range -- 20,000+

BTU per Gross Square Foot UTSA = 666666,777777 MMMMMMMMMM 55,222222,888888 GGGGGG 160.00 140.00 120.00 100.00 UTSA 121.99K APPA Average 119.21K 80.00 60.00 40.00 20.00 0.00 Building Age Range - - less than 20 Carnegie Class -- Research High Funding -- Public APPA Region -- CAPPA Enrollment Range -- 20,000+ Note: This is total BTU/GSF and not the same as the Energy Utilization Index (EUI). UTSA FY13 EUI is 170.9 considering chiller plant inefficiency factored in.

Capital Renewal Existing Capital Renewal Needs are $110M or 8.9% of the Current Replacement Value of the Campus. Without expenditures the Capital Renewal Needs will double over the next 10 years To maintain existing ratio of Renewal Needs to Replacement Value will require an annual expenditure of $10M 18

$7,000 Deferred Maintenance Remaining Balances $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $- Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Total $5,343 $4,185 $3,846 $3,693 $3,505 $3,270 $3,195 $3,012 $2,995 $2,544 $1,965 $2,464 $5,878 $5,793 $5,504 $5,319 $4,998 $4,745 $4,702 $4,702 $4,591 $4,574 $4,520 $4,512 $4,460 FY14 $3,448 $3,448 $3,148 $3,148 $2,837 $2,835 $2,831 $2,831 $2,831 $2,831 $2,831 $2,831 $2,831 FY13 $2,852 $2,154 $2,139 $2,126 $2,008 $2,087 $1,996 $2,018 $2,012 $1,832 $1,340 $1,840 $1,823 $1,819 $1,831 $1,683 $1,604 $1,497 $1,471 $1,471 $1,392 $1,375 $1,361 $1,361 $1,361 FY12 $1,324 $1,089 $878 $862 $833 $713 $658 $644 $646 $474 $432 $432 $427 $390 $390 $383 $468 $326 $320 $320 $320 $320 $320 $320 $268 FY11 $538 $532 $435 $333 $308 $187 $262 $165 $152 $146 $125 $124 $112 $69 $69 $39 $39 $39 $32 $32 $- $- $- $- $- FY10 $587 $364 $352 $331 $315 $242 $238 $144 $144 $76 $56 $56 $56 $56 $56 $56 $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 $- $- $- FY09 $42 $46 $42 $41 $41 $41 $41 $41 $41 $16 $12 $12 $12 $11 $10 $10 $10 $8 $8 $8 $8 $8 $8 $- $- $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000

5.0 Work Order Customer Satisfaction O & M Tri-Campus Types 1,4, & 6 4.0 3.0 2.0 FY13 Sep-2013 Oct-2013 Nov-2013 Dec-2013 Jan-2014 Feb-2014 Mar-2014 1.0-1 Facilities iservice Desk 2 Timely Response 3 Helpfulness and Courtesy 4 Quality of Service 5 Cost 6 Job Completion & Clean-up 7 Overall Service March-2014 Data: 95 surveys mailed 23% response rate 1,187 work orders