NCHRP Framework Project. Ida van Schalkwyk, CH2M HILL Tim Neuman, CH2M HILL. Crown Plaza Austin, Austin, TX

Similar documents
Safety Target Meeting Summary 10/3/2017

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Gr an t Writing Federal Non-Construction Proposal Elements

Performance-Based Planning and Programming Why Is It Important? Northwest TTAP and BIA Symposium Portland, OR March 17, 2015

The Impact of Preventable Injuries on State Budgets

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

RIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning

Performance-based Planning and Programming. white paper

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

Advances in Safety Program Practices in Zero-Fatalities States

A Guide for Applying AASHTO Policies to Achieve Flexibility in Highway Design. Timothy R. Neuman, PE Chief Highway Engineer CH2M HILL

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

Government Policy Statement on land transport 2018 release for public engagement

Draft. Amendment FY Unified Planning Work Program

House Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.

2045 Long Range Transportation

2012 AASHTO Washington Briefing February 27, Jeff Paniati Jeff Paniati Executive Director Federal Highway Administration

Financial Snapshot October 2014

Financial. Snapshot An appendix to the Citizen s Guide to Transportation Funding in Missouri

Additionally, the UPWP serves as a source for the following information:

Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts Performance Audit Division

NHTSA s Data Modernization Project

Mankato/North Mankato Area Planning Organization (MAPO) 2018 & (2019 Draft) Work Program & Budget

Prepared by the South East Texas Regional Planning Commission-Metropolitan Planning Organization (SETRPC-MPO) December 6, 2013

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Occupational Driving Safety Programs: The Missing Link in Most Safety and Health Management Systems

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT

FUTURE VIEW OF TRANSPORTATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR SAFETY

A New Cost-Benefit Methodology for Highway-Railway Grade Crossing Safety Programs

SOUTH CENTRAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION. Scope of Services. Terrebonne Parish

NATIONAL LAND TRANSPORT PROGRAMME / INformation sheet / october 2012

Matching Traffic Crash Victims to Hospital Patients: Probabilistic v. Deterministic Record Linkage Methods

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

Transportation for Montana s Future. Jim Lynch, Director Hal Fossum, Economist

Concept Development Activity Descriptions July, 2017

Target Formula Re-evaluation

Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

Transportation Asset Management Webinar Series Webinar 28: Financial Plans

Regional Economic Development Impacts of Transportation Investments

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Update

Mobility / Other Modes Roger Nober Executive Vice President Law and Secretary BNSF Railway

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

CalACT Expo Transit Asset Management (TAM) Plan Workshop 49 CFR 625 April 24, 2017

and Decision Making Processes Using Safety Data Washington State Department of Transportation

MPO Staff Report MPO EXECUTIVE BOARD: August 16, 2017

CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN

CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND. Update of Previous Planning Work. Plan Development Process. Public Involvement and Review Process

SENATE BILL No October 4, 2011, Introduced by Senators KAHN, MARLEAU and PAPPAGEORGE and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

FY Unified Planning Work Program. FY 2017 Unified Planning Work Program

How Did an Air Bag Get into My Steering Wheel? A Case Study in Injury Prevention Policy. Shannon Frattaroli, PhD, MPH Johns Hopkins University

Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance

FY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act. TIGER Discretionary Grant Program

MADISON ATHENS-CLARKE OCONEE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FY

Durham Chapel-Hill Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization

STAFF REPORT Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) Scenario Performance Update for Board Direction

Transportation Funding and Improving Roadway Services Delivery

1. I N T R O D U C T I O N

JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM AMENDMENT 1 FISCAL YEAR 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): ROAD TRANSPORT (NON-URBAN)

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Appendix G Economic Analysis Report

Developing a Transportation Asset Management Plan

PROGRAM FINANCING FUNDING

FY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act. TIGER Discretionary Grant Program

Oahu Regional Transportation Plan

INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN METRO AND WASHINGTON COUNTY FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR PLAN

Keep Wisconsin Moving Smart Investments Measurable Results

Transportation Funding State Comparisons. 21 st Century Transportation Committee August 21, 2008

Section 3. Relationship to Other Plans

DMP (Decision Making Process)

Roadmap of Funding Solutions for Sustainable Streets

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

751,000. Forecasting Our Growth POPULATION GROWTH: 2010 TO 2050

MoDOT Dashboard. Measurements of Performance

The Maryland Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI) Program Results From the Maryland CFOI Program

Optimization Model for Allocating Resources for Highway Safety Improvement at Urban Intersections

White Paper: Performance-Based Needs Assessment

MANITOBA PUBLIC INSURANCE

PRIORITIES COMMITTEE MEETING

Metropolitan Planning Organizations in North Carolina. Chris Lukasina NCAMPO

Automobile Ownership Model

PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE

In addition to embarking on a new dialogue on Ohio s transportation priorities,

Vaidila Satvika moved to approve the Consent Agenda and the Agenda as presented. Dan Baechtold seconded and the motion carried as all were in favor.

1 (b) Reconstruct and rehabilitate state highways to better maintain 2 them and prevent and avoid costly future repairs; 3 (c) Support local

Prioritization and Programming Process. NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming November 16, 2016

FY2018 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM (UPWP)

5/3/2016. May 4, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Analytic Methods for HIA: Innovative tools for quantitative analysis

A Projection of United States Traffic Fatality Counts in April Charles M. Farmer Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

Strengthening Vermont s Economy by Integrating Transportation and Smart Growth Policy

SKATS FY 2018-FY 2023

City of Daly City. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS for DALY CITY SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

The Maryland Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI) Program

Federal Highway Administration. Highway Infrastructure Security and Emergency Management. Professional Capacity Building Program

FY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act. TIGER Discretionary Grant Program

2040 Plan Update. Land Use Advisory Committee March 16, 2017

Transcription:

NCHRP 17-51 Framework Project Ida van Schalkwyk, CH2M HILL Tim Neuman, CH2M HILL June 15, 2011 AASHTO - Standing Committee on Highway Traffic Safety Crown Plaza Austin, Austin, TX

One death is one too many 2

Motor vehicle crash fatalities in the US 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 33,808 in 2009 0 3

What would it take to sustain or accelerate CONSISTENT and LONG-TERM fatality reduction? 4

Restraint use in fatal crashes 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 49% 31% Drivers: % Restraint Used Occupants: % Restraints Used 63% 43% 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: NHTSA Fatal Analysis Reporting System Encyclopedia, NCSA 5

% Drivers in fatal crashes Drinking-and-driving in fatal crashes 60% 50% 48% 40% 30% 22% 20% 10% % Drivers in fatal crashes driving with a BAC NE zero % Drivers in fatal crashes with BAC=.08+ 0% 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: NHTSA Fatal Analysis Reporting System Encyclopedia, NCSA 6

Motorcyclist fatalities Registered motorcycles Motorcyclists 6000 9,000,000 5000 8,000,000 7,000,000 4000 6,000,000 3000 5,000,000 4,000,000 2000 3,000,000 1000 0 Motorcyclist fatalities Registered Motorcycles 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 Source: NHTSA Fatal Analysis Reporting System Encyclopedia, NCSA 7

You ve done a great job but... a) Our job is not done b) We need to challenge ourselves to do better 8

NATIONAL STRATEGY ON HIGHWAY SAFETY Where we re going to Time frame 25-yr horizon Strategies Comprehensive, sustainable in the long-term, changing safety culture of users and organizations Stakeholders Expanded to include safety culture of users and organizations, vehicle safety, data and analysis (beyond the pavement & 4Es) Emphasis Across organizations, impacting the way business is done (across programs and projects) (beyond the HSIP) 9

NCHRP 17-51 Framework Project Marketing Project 10

NCHRP 17-51: Framework Project Input to the Development of a National Highway Safety Strategy CH2M HILL Prime Consultant Ida van Schalkwyk, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Tim Neuman, Howard Preston, Tegan Houghton, Richard Storm, Kim Kolody, Stacey Black, Cindy Juliano, Kate Bradbury MRIGlobal Doug Harwood, Ingrid Potts, Jessica Hutton Prof. Dan Turner, University of Alabama (Emeritus) Independent Consultants Scott Newton Quinn Brackett 11

NCHRP 17-51: Framework Project Develop the Framework for a National Strategy for Highway Safety Develop vision for a National Strategy for Highway Safety Identify and prioritize potential strategies Identify and document research needs Develop summary report with background for Framework content 12

The Framework/ National Strategy a tool that stakeholders can use to formulate their highway* safety plans at the national, state, or local level. NOTE: *The term highway refers to all public roadways, regardless of jurisdiction. 13

Approach to the project Review info Summary Report & Draft Framework Stakeholder input through webinars & stakeholder workshop Final Report & Framework Technical Support TZD Steering Committee will use the Framework from NCHRP 17-51 to develop a National Strategy on Highway Safety 14

NCHRP 17-51 Framework Project PROGRESS UPDATE 15

Fully executed # contract with JUNE CH2M HILL 16

Subcontracts with MRIGlobal # and other team members still in JUNE process 17

What does this mean to the project? # JUNE We started working on the project knowing the legal constraints but understanding the importance of moving forward as much as we could 18

A strategy for the next 25 years 19

% POPULATION AGE 65+ POPULATION AGE 65+ (millions) US Census Bureau 2008 Projections 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 65+ PORTION 65+ 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Source: US Census Bureau Projections 20

2010 21

2030 Source: AASHTO, 2010. Transportation Reboot Unlocking Freight 22

Transit and Vulnerable users 23

Progress WHAT HAVE WE BEEN UP TO 24

What we ve been up to Task 1: Gathering information Task 4: Stakeholder webinars 25

GATHER INFORMATION 1 info 1. White papers & policy documents 2. Strategies: tried & tested; potential; and those necessary to respond to the next 25 years 3. Stakeholders

GATHER INFORMATION info 2 1. White papers & policy documents 2. Strategies: tried & tested; potential; and those necessary to respond to the next 25 years 3. Stakeholders

GATHER INFORMATION 3 info 1. White papers & policy documents 2. Strategies: tried & tested; potential; and those necessary to respond to the next 25 years 3. Stakeholders

Importance of stakeholder input Ability of stakeholders to drive change Create buy-in & support national strategy Draw from knowledge & experiences Transparent & demonstrate commitment 29

STAKEHOLDER LIST FACE TO FACE PHONE Original List Extensive: 500 organizations Limited level: Legal & law enforcement Transit Additions project team made to the list: Motorcyclist-related Pedestrian-related Bicyclist-related Additional safety partners not included in original list Currently in progress: Metropolitan and regional agencies Tribes Large cities E-MAIL @ WEBINARS 30

Our first wave of webinars A special thank you to Kelly Hardy (AASHTO), Ewa Flom (FHWA), NHI 31

PUBLIC PROJECT WEBSITE www.strategicsafetyplan.com 32

Is the website being used? page requests 33

NCHRP 17-51 Framework Project NEXT STEPS 34

Next steps Task 1 & 4: Gather information (continue) Emerging/expansion of focus areas Review additional resources State-specific interviews Interviews with national stakeholders Surveys on an as-needed basis Further webinars identified on an as-needed basis Task 2: Develop summary report and draft framework Task 5: Plan Stakeholder Workshop (initiate planning likely end of September timeframe) Continue efforts with the 17-51 Marketing Team in coordinating efforts & sharing information 35

Vehicle passengers Emerging focus areas Children and adult restraint use (not just the driver); Passengers travelling in cargo areas of vehicles Public health (separate from EMS) Trauma, Injury prevention Within INFRASTRUCTURE: Non-state maintained system Counties, metropolitan areas, regions, cities, towns, tribal areas Within VULNERABLE USERS: Older drivers Folded into vulnerable users but yet the issue is so big when combined with pedestrians, bicyclists and motorcyclists Within INFRASTRUCTURE Addressing coordinated planning of multiple modes Moving beyond the pavement to linkage with livability, urban development, context etc. & dealing with the discussion in a sensitive way (there are many connotations.) LEGAL & LAW ENFORCEMENT 36

Contacts Project Team Email to Framework and Marketing Project teams: ch2mhillnchrp1751@ch2m.com Public project website: http://www.strategicsafetyplan.com Ida van Schalkwyk, Principal Investigator, Ida.vanschalkwyk@ch2m.com, 773-332-3137 NCHRP Chuck Niessner, CNiessner@nas.edu, 202-334-1431 AASHTO/ National TZD Steering Committee Kelly Hardy, khardy@aashto.org, 202-624-5868 37

Thank you for your time 38