RISK MANAGEMENT NEXT GENERATION

Similar documents
Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

Flood Risk Assessment in the

Kentucky Risk MAP It s not Map Mod II

David A. Stroud, CFM AMEC Earth & Environmental Raleigh, NC

Wildfire and Flood Hazards, Using GIS Tools to Assess Risk

RFQ # PRE-SUBMITTAL CONFERENCE

Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program

Use of FEMA Non regulatory Flood Risk Products in Planning

Flood Risk Products. New Techniques for Identifying and Communicating Flood Risk

N.C. Floodplain Mapping Program

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

3D Elevation Program (3DEP) Status and Plans. Kevin T. Gallagher Associate Director, Core Science Systems June 26, 2017

Best Practices. for Incorporating Building Science Guidance into Community Risk MAP Implementation November 2012

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Location: Tampa, Florida March 6, 2013

Leveraging HAZUS for Risk Assessment Analysis within Risk MAP

The Citadel. Multi-Hazard Mitigation Disaster Resistant University Plan

3DEP Coalition Meeting. Kevin T. Gallagher Associate Director, Core Science Systems November 10, 2016

Integrating Hazus into the Flood Risk Assessment

GIS - Introduction and Sample Uses

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

AIR Worldwide Analysis: Exposure Data Quality

Updated Total Exposure in Floodplain (TEIF) Method. Cynthia McCoy, FEMA Region X James Mawby, RAMPP (Dewberry)

National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call

GIS - Introduction and Sample Uses

Discovery Meeting: Middle Potomac- Catoctin Watershed. FEMA REGION III September 26, 2012 Rockville, MD and Fairfax, VA

New Tools for Mitigation & Outreach. Louie Greenwell Stantec

SOUTH CENTRAL REGION MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN. Advisory Committee Meeting September 12, 2012

Not Your Average Risk Assessment: Multi-Stage Risk Assessments for Sites in the Passaic River Basin Stuart Geiger, CFM Joseph Ruggeri, PE, CFM

Orange County Flood Insurance Study Update

Results from ECA study: Florida

Georgia Silver Jackets Team

INTRODUCTION TO NATURAL HAZARD ANALYSIS

LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW WORKSHEET FEMA REGION 2 Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction: Title of Plan: Date of Plan: Address:

Durham County Preliminary Flood Hazard Data Public Meeting. July 28, 2016

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

Title of Nomination: Flood Plain Mapping Project/System Manager: John Dorman. Center for Geographic Information Analysis Department: Address:

Flood Solutions. Summer 2018

Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program Risk MAP Plenary Session GAFM 2011

Oklahoma High Water Marks. CTP Community of Practice April 20, 2017

Chemung HUC-8 Watershed Project. February 1, 2011

Survey of Hazus-MH: FEMA s Tool for Natural Hazard Loss Estimation

Hazard Mitigation Planning

County of Kaua'i Multi-Hazard Mitigation and Resilience Plan, 2015 Update

Overview of Capabilities and Current Limitations

SECTION 6 - RANGE OF ALTERNATIVE MITIGATION ACTIONS CONSIDERED

Discovery Meeting: Lake Ontario. FEMA REGION II November 12-14, 2013 and November 19-21, 2013 Lake Ontario Contributing Watersheds

Piloting LAMP from Stream to Sea

Talk Components. Wharton Risk Center & Research Context TC Flood Research Approach Freshwater Flood Main Results

CRS UNIFORM MINIMUM CREDIT NORTH CAROLINA

Community Resilience & NFIP s Community Rating system

Flood Risk Resilience in Alabama: Challenges and Successes

Emergency Management. December 16, 2010

National Elevation Data for National Flood Insurance Policy; NFIP & 3DEP Efforts John JB Byrd of John M. Palatiello & Associates, Inc.

in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department

City of Pensacola and Escambia County Flood Risk and Flood Insurance Study

Flood Map Revisions. Town of Nags Head Public Information and Input Session. December 14, 2016, 6 pm

Northern Kentucky University 2018 Hazard Mitigation Plan. Public Kick-Off Meeting March 20, 2018

Outreach Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program. GAFM Technical Conference Flood Risk Outreach and Policy Session

Region VIII Applications of Nationwide HAZUS Flood and Earthquake Modeling-Multi

CHAPTER THREE Natural Hazard Mitigation Strategy

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Planning in Water s Way: Flood Resilient Economic Development Strategy for the I-86 Innovation Corridor

Modernization, FEMA is Recognizing the connection between damage reduction and

Calhoun County Flood Insurance Study Update

NFIP Mapping Issues. Wendy Lathrop, PLS, CFM. Cadastral Consulting, LLC

Presenters. Bracken Engineering. Structures Disasters Forensics

Town of Montrose Annex

Mapping Flood Risk in the Upper Fox River Basin:

Appendix F: Ozark special Road District Addendum

USACE Silver Jackets, the Missouri State Risk Management Team and State Hazard Mitigation

Village of Blue Mounds Annex

Delaware Bay / River Coastal Flood Risk Study. FEMA REGION II and III September 19, 2012

PUBLIC SURVEY FOR HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING

G318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Module 2: Risk Assessment. Visual 2.0

APPENDIX D PLANNING PROCESS DOCUMENTATION

Garfield County NHMP:

Understanding CCRIF s Hurricane, Earthquake and Excess Rainfall Policies

Resilience and the Economics of Risk. NACo s Resilient Counties Advisory Board February 2016

NFIP Program Basics. KAMM Regional Training

OTTAWA COUNTY AND SANDUSKY COUNTY COMMUNITY CONSULTATION OFFICERS (CCO) MEETING December 7, 2017

Southwest Florida Discovery Kick-Off Meeting. February 4, 2014

Accounting for Long-Term Erosion and Sea Level Rise in New England: A TMAC Recommendation

LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK

Updates to Maine Coastal Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM s): What a Local Official Should Know. Presented by: Steve Johnson, P.E.

Enough about me! Topics Covered

Middlesex County Timeline

INSURANCE AFFORDABILITY A MECHANISM FOR CONSISTENT INDUSTRY & GOVERNMENT COLLABORATION PROPERTY EXPOSURE & RESILIENCE PROGRAM

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

Mike Waters VP Risk Decision Services Bob Shoemaker Sr. Technical Coordinator. Insurance Services Office, Inc

Erie County Flood Risk Review Meeting. January 18, 2018

DeSoto Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kick-off Meeting. February 16, 2016 Grand Cane, LA

GEO CODING IN NAT CAT UNDERWRITING. 2. Part I: CRESTA in NAT Cat Underwriting. 3. Part II: NATHAN in NAT Cat Underwriting

Tangipahoa Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mitigation Steering Committee Kick-off Meeting. September 9, 2014 Hammond, LA

NATURAL PERILS - PREPARATION OR RECOVERY WHICH IS HARDER?

GAFM Showcase: Multiple Agencies Combating Georgia s Flood Risk Together: Proven Results Gained by Strong Partnerships

Risk, Mitigation, & Planning

Overview of Climate Risk Reduction in the US Pacific Islands Hazard Mitigation Planning Efforts

United States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Requesters. December 2010 FEMA FLOOD MAPS

Overview of HAZUS for Earthquake Loss Estimation. September 6, 2012

Sussex County All Hazard Mitigation Plan. Plan Executive Summary

Transcription:

RISK MANAGEMENT NEXT GENERATION STATE UPDATE July 2014 Marc Stanard / John Dorman

Risk Management Key Components and National Status Risk Monitoring No digital tracking Big Elephant to Track Not Tied to Other Processes Risk Mitigation Not integrated with Hazard Identification or Risk Assessment Focus is on Compliance No Prioritization Methodology in Place Hardcopy / No Versioning Risk Management Hazard Identification Low Resolution Mapping Lack holistic Mapping of Hazards No Methodologies / Models Risk Assessment Lack Vulnerability Data Low Resolution Impact Models No Interdependency Failure Modeling No Risk Assessment Products for Decision Makers (Financial)

Integrated Hazard Risk Management - Concept Hazard Data 1. Hazard Identification 4. Communication 3. Risk Assessment Vulnerabilities 2. Vulnerable Systems 5. Mitigation

NC Progression To Integrated Hazard Risk Management Framework and Lifecycle Framework Data Acquisition Flood Hazard Mapping Digital Display Environment Exposure Identification Structural Flood Risk Management Integrated Hazard Risk Management

LiDAR-Derived Digital Elevation Model (circa 2000-2005)

Digital Topographic-bathymetric Model

QL2 Topo Statewide Acquisition Plan QL2 Statewide Plan 5 Phases / 4 Year Phase 1- USGS and Phase 2- NC are both acquired in 2014 With the financial partnering by USDA NRCS, Phase I added Onslow County. Therefore moving the NC collection Phase 2 to add Robeson County

Remote Sensing: LiDAR Technology LiDAR, a Remote Sensing Technology similar to SONAR and RADAR, was used by NC to support Generation 1 of Flood Hazard Mapping in NC. Acquired in three Phases: 2000; 2003; 2005. Nominal Point Spacing of 10 feet (3 meter). Accuracy requirement of 20 cm RMSE in the coastal area; 25 cm RMSE for the remainder of the state.

LiDAR-Derived Elevation Classification Un-Classified Data Ground/Bare Earth Vegetation Buildings Roads/Impervious

QL2 Topo Point Summary LIDAR Quality Ground Points in 5 Acre Parcel 30m NED 32 10m NED 300 4m (circa 2003) 7,696 QL2 76,957 *QL2 is a 1,000% increase in analysis points

Vegetation Detection

Low Shrubs

Medium Bushes/small trees

High Large trees

Total Canopy Detection

3D Volume of Vegetation

30 Meter Elevation Model

10 Meter Elevation Model

3 Meter Elevation Model (2003 NC LiDAR)

QL2 Elevation Model

QL2 - Building Footprint Extraction and Updates Buildings are classified within the LiDAR point cloud Algorithm looks for planar surfaces with steep edges

QL2 Topo - RGB Composite 3D Fly through Movie *Play NC_QL2_LiDAR.mp4 outside of PowerPoint

ACQUISITION / GENERATION Natural Hazards GTMO has acquired all hazard data available to display at different magnitude levels / annual frequency on the parcel, statewide, and national level for: Riverine flooding Dam failure probability Levee failure - probability Coastal flooding Storm surge from hurricanes - Coastal erosion long term damage curve methodology Landslides hazard raster / damage methodology Earthquakes Wind (straight line and hurricane) Tornadoes new HAZUS methodology Wildfire damage methodology Snow/Ice failure threshold / damage methodology Hail - failure threshold / damage methodology Drought hazard raster / damage curves Sea Level Rise - probability

Engineering TSDN Transition from Cartographic To Digital, Database Display D 2 E Database

Engineering TSDN Floodway Data Flood Profiles Survey D 2 E Database

Engineering TSDN Floodway Data Flood Profiles Survey Risk One Source for All Products D 2 E Database

Exposure Identification - Statewide Building Footprints

Field Collection First Floor Elevation Foundation Type Roof Shape Roof Slope Number of Stories Parcel Conflation Occupancy Type Building Value Year Built Heated Sq Ft Roof Shape HAZUS Block Conflation Roof Cover Type Roof Cover Quality Water Resistance Roof Deck Attachment Roof Deck Age Roof Wall Connection Roof Frame Type Hurricane Shutters Roof Tie Downs Window Area Masonry Reinforcing Joist Spacing Number of Units

Risk Management Structure Data First Floor Elevations Aug 2014 Aug 2014 Sept 2014 July 2014 Complete

Edgecombe

New Edgecombe Durham Macon Hanover County Analysis Impacted Total Losses ($) Type Structures irisk 1,733 7,353 1,002 426 $1,859,858,451 $218,184,903 $136,041,414 $77,586,478 Census Level 4,652 2,465 738 150 $1,112,166,000 $161,437,000 $724,938,000 $73,767,000 Census Level Variation 108% Census Level Variation -46% Census Level Variation -40% Census Level Variation 232%

All Natural Hazards Risk Assessments Statewide Completion Dates April 2014 March 2014 March 2015 May 2014 July 2014 June 2014

FRIS irisk ReadyNC FIMAN Flood Insurance nce Study Flood Risk Map Flood Risk Report http://fris.nc.gov/fris

http://irisk.nc.gov/irisk/

School Risk Management Plan School Safety Risk Management Plan Child Care Facility Risk Management Plan RMT Fuel Risk Management Plan Child Care Facility Risk Management Plan Fuel Risk Management Plan Mental Health Facility Disaster Plan License Care Facility Disaster Plan New Hanover County Recovery Disaster Plan Flood Risk Mgmt. Plan (FRMP) Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Dam Emergency Action Plan Mental Health Facility Disaster Plan License Care Facility Disaster Plan County Recovery Disaster Plan

The SERA and SRMP Tool System

Annotated Floor Plans

SERA: General School View

SERA: Hazard Specific View

SERA: View Photos

Risk Management Key Components and Condition Risk Monitoring All-Digital / Free, Access by Planners and Decision Makers Hazard Plans allow for One Hazard at a Time Will be tied to the Flood Hazard Update 3 ½ to 5 year cycle Risk Mitigation IRISK and RMT are integrated with Hazard Identification or Risk Assessment Focus is on Analysis and Mitigation Strategies Defined Mitigation Strategies and ROI Prioritization Methodology in Place All-Digital / Versioning Risk Management Hazard Identification Low Resolution Mapping Lack Comprehensive Mapping of Hazards Central Location for Methodologies / Models Risk Assessment Acquired Vulnerability Data Constructing / Acquired Impact Models No Interdependency Failure Modeling irisk Provides Risk Assessment for Decision Makers (Financial)

INTEGRATED HAZARD RISK MANAGEMENT LIFECYCLE DEMONSTRATION Proposed Counties

ALL HAZARDs Risk Management Lifecycle Concept Strategy / Action Monitor / Evaluation Pre-Resilience Meeting Resilience Meeting Adoption Funding All Hazard Mapping / Risk Analysis Prelim. Appeals and Protest Period LFD Public Hearings Process / Product Review of Hazard Risk Strategies Identify Hazards Requiring Assessments Establish Hazard Risk Mapping and Assessment Community Charter Updates data on: All Hazards Buildings CI/KR Parcel - Conflation Analysis H&H Analysis SFHA Mapping Other Hazards Raster Datasets FRIS / Risk Analysis irisk Database Products / Tasks Introduction of FRIS and irisk Preliminary FIRM Changes Since Last FIRM Draft Risk MAP Risk Analysis by Structure FRMP Draft Attendees Public Officials / Staff Mitigation Officers Public Meeting for Flood Risk Datasets FIRM (Final) Risk Map Hot spots Mitigation Strategies Draft FRMP Attendees FPAs Public Officials Mitigation Officers Adopt FRMP Adopt FIRM Data

Risk Management New Methodologies / Algorithms Develop and Implement Methodologies / Algorithms to calculate Population at the Structure (includes spatial and temporal analysis) Development and Implement Methodologies to calculate Impact of Man-Made Hazard Impact Analysis on Structures (including damage assessments and debris generation). Development and Implement Methodologies to calculate Impact of Man-Made Hazard Impact Analysis on Infrastructure and Vehicles (roads, water systems, vehicles). Will test on Train Derailment Chemical Disbursement.

Train Derailment Chemical Disbursement Impact Analysis Analyses Example

Risk Management: Next Generation VISION: Resilient communities that are prepared for, and thus are able to absorb and bounce back from hazards. Seamless risk management lifecycle (identification, assessment, mitigation, monitoring) including funding. Mitigation strategies and funding tied to true risk: impact to built and living environment; and community s capability to respond / recover.

Risk Management: Prerequisites To Achieve Next Generation Construction / Enhancement / Refinement Spatial Data and Models Associated with Built and Living Systems, and ALL Hazards (natural and man-made). Transition from Cartographic Environment to a Database-Driven, Digital Display Environment (Completed). Statewide Risk Assessment of ALL-Hazards (natural and man-made). Integrated ALL-Hazards Risk Management Lifecycle Process / Framework. Consolidation of Funding Streams to support each Phase of the All- Hazards Risk Management Lifecycle Process. Establishment / Utilization of Venue / Framework for Partnering, Leveraging and Sharing of Risk Management Methodologies, Models, an Systems.

DISCUSSION

Safer School Risk Management Viewer QUESTIONS? John.Dorman@ncdps.gov 919-825-2310