Saanich Citizen and Business Surveys 2015 February 2015

Similar documents
2017 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Final Report

City of Lethbridge 2014 Community Satisfaction Survey. Key Findings August 2014

2018 Spring Pulse Survey Overview

City of Chilliwack 2019 Financial Plan. Glen Savard, CPA, CGA Director of Finance

2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey

Citizen Budget Budget Consultation Online Summary Report. November 25, Overview:

2016 Citizen Satisfaction Survey

QUALITY OF LIFE AND COMMUNITY

Financial Plan

2016 Citizen Satisfaction Survey

Deputy Mayor K. L. Christian, Councillors D. M. Cavers, D. W. Dudy, T. Lange, A. H. Singh, M. L. Spina, P. A. Wallace, and D. J. Walsh.

CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE Citizen Survey. Survey conducted by Prairie Research Associates May 2017

City of Sugar Land Community Survey. Prepared by:

City of Tacoma. Community Survey Key Findings. MDB Insight. February, Presented by

District of North Saanich 2019 Dra Budget

COMMITTEE REPORT TO COUNCIL

Citizen s Perspective

4. Please indicate whether you feel that there are too many, the right amount or not enough of each of the following in Littleton:

The National Citizen Survey 2004

The City of Dallas, Texas

Rothesay Citizen Satisfaction Study

Arvada, Colorado. Citizen Survey. Report of Results October Prepared by:

Taxes: This 2019 Budget holds property and income taxes for city services at their current rates.

Durham City and County Resident Survey

Fund Structure. West Vancouver s financial framework is organized around several high-level functional units, called Funds.

Mayor and Council Inder Litt, Senior Business Licence Inspector Proposed Changes to the Business Licence Bylaw

The National Citizen Survey

City of Port Moody Citizen Survey. Presented by: Catherine Knaus, Ipsos Reid

To: The Mayor and Councilors, Bowen Island Municipality From: Finance Review Task Force Date: September 10, 2012

AGENDA SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING SCHEDULED RECESS AT 2:30 P.M.

2018 BUDGET AND FINANCIAL PLAN

ROY CITY SURVEY PRESENTATION A COLLABORATION BETWEEN CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGED LEARNING AND ROY CITY.

Job/Survey. City of Bellingham Client Service Name: Priorities and Customer Satisfaction Survey. Pamela Jull, PhD. October 2008

City of Tacoma, WA Citizen Survey Report of Results

FY Annual Budget: Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure, & Sustainability

Rapid City. Citizen Budget Priority Survey. February 2018

City of Coquitlam. Statement of Financial Information 2016

2016 Financial Statements

City of Vancouver Budget Allocation Study Wave 6. January, Presented to: City of Vancouver. Vancouver, BC

2017 Citizen Survey. Prepared for the City of Kelowna by: Final Report October 31, 2017

City of Kamloops Provisional Budget including supplemental items

2018 PRELIMINARY CORPORATE BUSINESS PLAN & BUDGET Governance & Priorities Committee (GPC) October 16, 2017 Presentation By Murray Totland City

City of San Rafael: 2011 City Satisfaction Survey Topline Report March 2011

REPORT Finance and Information Technology

2011 Financial Statements

Importance-Satisfaction Analysis

City of Mercer Island. February First Avenue Suite 451 Seattle, WA (206)

Ann Arbor, MI Comparisons by Demographic Subgroups 2018

2955 Valmont Road Suite North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado Washington, DC n-r-c.com icma.

Charlottesville, VA. Supplemental Online Survey Results

2016 Statement of Financial Information. City of Burnaby. For the fiscal year ended December 31, British Columbia, Canada

City of Brighton City Survey Results for 2013

PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

New Braunfels, TX. Technical Appendices DRAFT 2017

2001 AND 2002 CURRENT ESTIMATES. Adopted December 12, 2000

Budget 2015 Engagement. Nov. 24, 2014

The National Citizen Survey

City of Kelowna Citizen Survey

City of Kamloops Consolidated Financial Statements For the year ended December 31, 2016

City of Austin, Minnesota 2018 Performance Measurements Survey Summaries & Pie Charts

The National Citizen Survey

Consolidated Financial Statements of CITY OF LANGFORD. Year ended December 31, 2009

2012 Operating Budget. February 28, 2012

CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE

City of Mississauga Municipal Performance Measurements Program (MPMP) Results. For the period ending December 31, 2013

2030 Infrastructure Plan Introduction

Littleton, CO 2016 Business Survey

Committee of the Whole Agenda

CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE

The National Citizen Survey

THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF LUMBY

City of Kelowna Regular Council Meeting AGENDA

CITY OF PORT MOODY 2009 CAPITAL BUDGET SUMMARY

CITY OF KAMLOOPS. Financial Statements for the Year-Ended 2013 December 31. Page 1 of 66

The City of Owen Sound Asset Management Plan

MUNICIPALITY OF MISSISSIPPI MILLS. plan. December, 2016

Presentation by: City Manager, Murray Totland *check against delivery

Mayor and Council Randy Millard, Financial Planning and Reporting Manager Development Cost Charge Reserve Fund Expenditure Bylaws

FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN budget district of west vancouver

1001 Lindsay Street Chattanooga, Tennessee (423) FAX: (423)

Company/Organization Address Phone Number Cell Number

January 19, Dear Members of City Council:

The Corporation of the City of Victoria Financial Statements For the year ended December 31, 2017

PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABILITY:

% OF MUNICIPAL PILT Revenue % of ALL Municipal FEDERAL PILT. Municipal from PILT Purposes MUNICIPALITY

Automobile Insurance Attitudes British Columbia. 1,000 British Columbians September 25 October 1, 2017

Morristown, TN Supplemental Online Survey Results

When you have finished the survey click the 'Done' button to submit your survey.

The National Citizen Survey

The National Citizen Survey

Kelowna, British Columbia, Hones Its Financial Principles and Strategies

CITY OF SALEM FINANCIAL SUMMARY

What we Heard (More Detailed Version) Budget Public Engagement

Special Finance Committee FINANCE AND CORPORATE SERVICES DIVISION

CITY OF KAMLOOPS Council Budget Meeting Agenda March 14, 2017, at 9:00 am in Council Chambers at 7 Victoria Street West, Kamloops, BC, V2C 1A2

The National Citizen Survey

2955 Valmont Road, Suite North Capitol Street NE, Suite 500 Boulder, CO Washington, DC 20002

The National Citizen Survey

Community Meeting 03/22/2018

City of Niagara Falls 2018 Operating Budget

Transcription:

Saanich Citizen and Business Surveys 2015 February 2015 1

Background and Methodology 2

Research Objectives The objectives of the 2015 Citizen and Business Survey are to: Determine overall impressions toward quality of life in Saanich, including Saanich as a place to operate a business Determine level of satisfaction and importance of services provided by the District of Saanich (i.e. gap analysis) Determine resident and business perceptions when it comes to taxation, services, and the allocation of future municipal funding Determine how residents and businesses prefer to receive communication from the municipality Benchmark the results of the 2015 Citizen Survey with those from 2006, 2009 and 2012; and Benchmark key performance indicators (KPIs) with comparable municipalities/areas in the province of British Columbia 3

Methodology Phase One: Research was conducted via live agent Computer-Assisted-Telephone- Interviewing (CATI) methodology of residents and businesses in the District of Saanich Random sample of 603 households and 300 businesses in Saanich, Respondents were called from January 12 th to January 17 th (including weekends) between 5:00pm and 9:00pm (PST) Surveys were approximately 15 to 20 minutes in length) Margin of error is -/+3.9 (95% confidence interval) Phase Two: Research was conducted via Interactive Voice Response (IVR) amongst residents in 8 comparable regions in British Columbia. These were: City of Abbotsford City of Coquitlam District of Delta City of Kelowna City of Nanaimo District of North Vancouver City of Richmond City of Victoria Respondents were called on January 13 th between 5:00pm and 9:00pm (PST) A total of 469 interviews were completed, each approximately 6 minutes in length A full report will be available on saanich.ca in early March 2015 4

Quality of Life in Saanich 5

Nearly all Saanich residents say quality of life is good or very good 61% 57% 55% 52% 47% 45% 42% 38% 99% say quality of life is good or very good Proportion of residents who say very good is decreasing; and, Proportion of residents who say good is increasing 1% 1% 0% 1%* 0% 0% 0% 0%* Very Good Good Poor Very Poor 2006 2009 2012 2015 2006 2009 2012 2015 Top 2 Box % 99% 99% 100% 99% 6

Nearly all business owners in Saanich say quality of life is good or very good 98% 49% 49% 2% 0%* Very Good Good Poor Very Poor *Less than 1% 7

Residents rate Quality of Life Higher than the Normative Benchmark Very Good Good Poor 1% 7% 45% 47% 46% 52% 99% of Saanich residents vs. 91% of residents in comparative areas rate quality of life as good or very good Less than 1% of Saanich residents compared to 9% of residents in comparable areas say quality of life is poor or very poor. Very Poor 0% 2% Saanich Benchmark Saanich Benchmark Top 2 Box % 99% 91% 8

The Majority of Residents (75%) say Quality of Life has stayed the same in the past 3 years Roads / road repairs / infrastructure Better management of the municipality Parks and Greenspace 75% Too much traffic Poor local economy Poor road maintenance 15% 10% Improved Stayed the same Worsened 9

Operating a Business in Saanich 10

Strong Majority of Business Owners say Saanich is a good or very good place to Operate a Business Very Good 28% 94% Good 66% Poor 4% Very Poor 2% 11

83% of Business Owners say Saanich has stayed the same when it comes to operating a Business New malls / stores / updated shopping centres More customers / clients Market has improved 83% Too many regulations / bureaucratic Hard to start / maintain a business Local economy / cost of living 10% 7% Improved Stayed the same Worsened 12

Satisfaction with Services 13

Satisfaction with Services amongst Saanich Residents is significantly higher than the Norm Service Satisfaction (Top 2 Box %: very/somewhat satisfied) Saanich Benchmark Performance Gap Land use planning 80% 53% 27%* Local Government Website 96% 83% 13%* Quality of recreation programs and services 99% 88% 11%* Ease of travel by bicycle 77% 67% 10%* Bylaw enforcement for issues such as noise, parking and property 85% 76% 8%* Police Services 97% 89% 8%* Quality of arts, cultural and community events 90% 83% 6%* Maintenance of parks and trails 97% 91% 6%* Condition, lighting and maintenance of streets and sidewalks 76% 73% 3% Ease of pedestrian travel 82% 80% 2% Fire Services 99% 98% 1% * statistically significant 14

Highest and Lowest Priorities to Improve Overall Satisfaction with Services Service / Program Importance Performance Priority Condition, lighting and maintenance of streets and sidewalks.248 76 1 Design of streets, public spaces and boulevard areas.370 85 2 Land use planning.274 80 3 Building inspections and permits.277 82 4 Ease of pedestrian travel.244 82 5 Police services.184 97 22 Quality of drinking water.148 98 23 Fire Services.176 99 24 School fire safety program.143 98 25 Quality of recreation programs and services.206 99 26 High Low 15

Satisfaction ratings for Service Delivery in Saanich exceeds the Norm 86% Staff went the extra mile 78% 68% 92% Staff informed them of everything 86% 75% 94% Staff were knowledgeable and competent 90% 80% Residents Business Owners Benchmark 16

Perception of Governance 17

79% of Residents agree that Saanich welcomes Citizen Involvement 64% 59% 64% 56% 77% of Business owners agree that Saanich welcomes their involvement 23% 21% 20% 23% 10% 14% 12% 17% 3% 6% 4% 4% Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree 2006 2009 2012 2015 2006 2009 2012 2015 Top 2 Box % 87% 80% 84% 79% 18

3 out of 4 Residents say Saanich Listens to its Citizens 60% 59% 60% 55% 74% of Business owners say that Saanich listens to businesses 19% 21% 14% 20% 15% 14% 18% 18% 6% 6% 8% 7% Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree 2006 2009 2012 2015 2006 2009 2012 2015 Top 2 box % 79% 80% 74% 75% 19

86% of Saanich Residents agree that Government in Saanich is doing a good job 68% 61% 67% 61% 24% 27% 22% 25% 6% 11% 10% 9% 2% 1% 1% 5% Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree 2006 2009 2012 2015 2006 2009 2012 2015 Top 2 Box % 92% 88% 89% 86% 20

83% of Business Owners agree that Government in Saanich is doing a good job 83% 63% 20% 10% 7% Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree 21

81% of Residents agree that they are pleased with the Overall Direction Saanich is taking 69% 62% 68% 58% 20% 21% 19% 23% 8% 14% 11% 13% 3% 3% 2% 6% Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree 2006 2009 2012 2015 2006 2009 2012 2015 Top 2 Box % 89% 83% 87% 81% 22

80% of Business Owners agree that they are pleased with the Overall Direction Saanich is taking 80% 62% 18% 13% 7% Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree 23

Financial Sustainability 24

A large proportion of Saanich Residents (42%) believe the Municipality should rely more on Government Grants Government grants (5%) 42% 40% 7% 11% Rely More User fees (30%) 16% 58% 17% 9% Same Reserves or savings (15%) 13% 50% 21% 16% Same Borrowing (3%) 8% 50% 29% 12% Same Same Property taxation (47%) 8% 53% 31% 8% More Same Less Don t know 25

Majority of Business owners believe current reliance on funds should remain the same for all sources Government grants (5%) 41% 50% 9% Same User fees (30%) 16% 57% 27% Same Reserves or savings (15%) 12% 68% 20% Same Borrowing (3%) 10% 63% 27% Same Same Property taxation (47%) 4% 55% 41% More Same Less 26

Majority of Saanich Residents and Business Owners say they prefer to keep the same level of Services with Taxes unchanged 74% 71% Residents Business Owners 21% 11% 7% 12% 3% 1% Improve municipal services with higher taxes Same level of municipal services with taxes unchanged Reduced level of municipal services with lower taxes No Opinion 27

Capital Budget Spending Priorities Amongst Saanich Citizens Water distribution system 50% Sanitary sewer system 49% Environment protection and enhancement 47% Storm water drainage system 46% Roads and traffic control 46% 28

Capital Budget Spending Priorities Amongst Saanich Business Owners Sanitary sewer system 52% Environment protection and enhancement 48% Roads and traffic control 47% Water distribution system 45% Storm water drainage system 41% 29

Strong Majority of Residents (89%) agree they receive good value for their tax Dollars 64% 65% 63% 62% 20% 23% 23% 27% 10% 10% 11% 7% 6% 2% 3% 4% Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree 2006 2009 2012 2015 2006 2009 2012 2015 Top 2 Box % 84% 88% 86% 89% 30

Strong Majority of Business Owners (83%) agree that they receive good value for their tax dollars 83% 65% 18% 12% 5% Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree 31

Questions? 32