Money Advice Performance Management Summary Council
The Money Advice Performance Management Framework (MAPMF) has been developed in consultation with local authorities and other key stakeholders. It aims to measure key performance indicators for money advice services funded by local authorities on both an inhouse and commissioned basis. This is a summary of the key findings from the data returns for 9 months, from late July 6 to March 7, for the MAPMF for Council. Data for the full year cannot be provided, aside from Financial Gain, due to issues with the MACS case management system, which replaced with the AdvicePro system. As this is the third year in which data returns have been provided, it is possible to begin to identify emerging trends at both local and national levels. The information received from individual local authorities has been collated in order to produce a Scotlandwide analysis reflecting the significant impact of money advice services at a national level. This should be considered in conjunction with this local summary. While the MAPMF provides a structure from which it is possible to benchmark and target services, as well as identify and share areas of good practice, it is an iterative process. The current framework does not reflect the full complexity of cases or the many positive outcomes that money advice clients experience in addition to financial gain. Development is currently underway regarding improvements to the framework that will address these issues in time for reporting on the 7/8 financial year. Comparison with the reported position in 4/5 and 5/6 is limited due to the 6/7 data reflecting only 9 months of activity. Key findings are detailed below, where comparison can be made: Internal funding decreased by % between 4/5 and 5/6, then by around 4% between 5/6 and 6/7, to 6, External funding remained relatively stable at around 8,, fluctuating by around, throughout the three years Internal paid staff decreased by.8 FTE between 5/6 and 6/7, while external paid FTE staff remained steady at.4 FTE across all three years Case Study money advice services helped a vulnerable client to settle substantial debts by negotiating with creditors on his behalf. The client was not working due to ill health, and had just experienced a household break up. They had, equity in a 66, mortgage, a yearold hire purchase agreement for a car, and credit card debts totalling 6,. On further examination, the adviser discovered that the hire purchase vehicle was valued at 5,, but that the agreement was valued at four times the car s value. A further loan agreement had also been taken out to replace four windows with PVC double glazing and a security door. Initially, the service negotiated per month token payments to the creditors in
order to allow time to look into the options open to the client. Adult Protection concerns also were raised regarding whether the client had a learning disability, as well as whether he had the capacity to contract. He was referred to the Adult Psychological Therapies team, who confirmed that he had a learning disability, and did have the capacity to contract. The money advice service also assisted the client to make benefit claims for Employment and Support Allowance and Personal Independence Payment. The creditors were contacted again, at this point, to request debt write offs. Only one creditor initially did so, though the company financing the car loan later agreed also. Trading Standards had to escalate the case against one creditor to ombudsman complaint due to their cold calls and home visits, coupled with evidence that the client may not fully understand the contracts he was signing. A favourable eviction date was negotiated for the client after decree was granted at the Sheriff Court. Following repossession of the former home, the secured lenders were reimbursed out of the proceeds. The client also obtained around 5, by releasing his pension early, which was used to settle remaining debts with a 5% discount.
Ref Demographic Categories 4/5 5/6 6/7 Scotland 6/7 C Sex Male Female Don t know Age 5 64 54 544 4559 674 75+ Not Recorded Ethnicity Disability or longterm condition Income Economic Status White Any Mixed or Multiple Ethnic Groups Asian, Asian Scottish or Asian British African Caribbean or Black Other Ethnic Group Not Recorded Yes No Not Recorded 6, or less 6,,, 5, 5,,, 5, 5,,, 4, Over 4, Not Recorded Self employed Employed full time Employed part time Looking after the home or family Permanently retired from work Unemployed and seeking work At school In further/higher education Gov t work or training scheme Permanently sick or disabled Unable to work because of shortterm illness or injury Other Don t know 7 64 5 8 44 49 9 4 9 455 8 7 8 4 67 5 4 9 5 6 4 8 8 99 56 56 9 4 489 9 4 79 6 4 5 85 6 6 89 4 48 5 7 4 8 5 6 4 6 5 8 89 6 6 7 6 6 4 5 4 5 5 57,94 7,4,9 8 4,5 9,57 9,77,74 6,87 4,86,66 4,767 6,5,5 46 68 4,559,8,8 5,66,5,58 8,7 4,68,964, 689 6 5,685, 7,646 5,76,98 4,796 6,87 69 4 5,65,7,5,9. Figures for 6/7 include a 9month recording period only 4
Ref Demographic Categories 4/5 5/6 6/7 Scotland 6/7 Housing Tenure Household Composition Owner occupied Social rented Private rented Other Don t know Single adult (non pensioner) Single pensioner Single parent (one or more children) Family (two adults, and one or more children) Adult family (two or more nonpensioners, and no children) Older adult family (contains at least one pensioner) Don t know 9 8 66 44 94 86 9 95 85 6 66 58 9 5 98 9 84 9 9 9 5 89 8 44 5 5 8,7 5,65 7,5 7,,777,94 6 7,88 6,85 6,57 46 5,47. Until 6/7, MAPMF did not separate single pensioner from the single adult category, nor older adult family from the adult family category. 5
Ref Indicator 4/5 5/6 6/7 Scotland 6/7 C C I I A Number of money advice services in the LA area Inhouse Externally funded Case management system/s AdvicePro Amount of debt owed by client Benefit overpayment Council Tax arrears Utility arrears Credit, store and charge debts Catalogue Unsecured personal loan Payday loan high cost credit Overdrafts Mortgage arrears Rent arrears Rent to own Others 5 Number of FTE staff InHouse External Number of Volunteer FTE staff InHouse External Local Authority Funding InHouse External Other Sources of Funding Scottish Legal Aid Board Scottish Government Big Lottery Fund Housing Associations Volume Contacts Total clients New clients..4 88,76. 7,4. 76..4 69,99.4,5.96 4 59,8.7 8,559.6 5,9.9,989.8 4,869.77 5,6.99 55,58.7.5.4 6, 8, 46, 9 5 9 76.6m.47m.75m 4.4m 4.7m 5.45m 7.48m.56m 7.9m 9.8m 8.6m 54.69m.67m 94.4.7.5 4.m 7.6m 555,6 8,57 8,4, 59,64 49,565. Figures for 6/7 include a 9month recording period only 4. Internal: Welfare Rights service; external: CAB 5. Includes 4 cases cannot specify type of debt 6
Ref Indicator 4/5 5/6 6/7 Scotland 6/7 A Contacts by channel Facetoface Telephone Email Web Webchat Letter Other 6 Referrals Health Social Care Third Sector Other 7 Open SNSIAP cases Type I Type II Type III Closed SNSIAP cases Type I Type II Type III First reason for contacting agency Benefit overpayment Council Tax arrears Credit, store and charge card debts Catalogue debts PPI Payday loan/high cost credit Unsecured personal loan (except payday loans) Bank and building society overdrafts Mortgage arrears Rent arrears Other (Please specify) 7 9 7 9 8 45 9 76 89 5 57,66 5,55 7,599,544 6 498,8 4,678,58 5,97,64,499 5,9,94,86,949,77 87 7 57,55,7 98,7,74 6. Includes those accessing the service via referral form (74) and ongoing cases transferred from the former MACS database system (45) 7. Includes selfreferrals (6), local authority departments (i.e. Housing) (), Child Social Worker (), Solicitor () 7
Ref Indicator 4/5 5/6 6/7 Scotland 6/7 OP. OC Breakdown of debt strategy agreed with client Sequestration Debt Arrangement Scheme Trust Deed Awaiting sequestration Token payments Pro rata offers Moratorium Debt written off Repayment plan Nil Payments/offers Consolidation loan Mortgage to rent/shared equity Did not agree a debt strategy Still awaiting outcome Other: please specify Financial gain Verified Unverified 7 9,8,7.87,8 9 547,97,9 89 76,6 46 8 5,,96 757 5.m 5.5m 8