EU FLOODS DIRECTIVE: SHARING A METHODICAL PROCESS TO IMPROVE FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT

Similar documents
VADEMECUM ON FINANCING IN THE FRAME OF THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP

Roadmap for future regional action in disaster risk management with focus on flood risk management and aspects with a multi-beneficiary dimension

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Findings and Recommendations the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

EAP Task Force. EAP Task

REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA

Findings and Recommendations SERBIA

Findings and Recommendations Montenegro

The EU Flood Action Programme Towards a fully integrated river basin management

7075/1/09 REV 1 (en, de, fr) CF/ap 1 DGH4

EU Funding Maria Brättemark WFD Team, DG ENV.D.1, European Commission

ANNEX ICELAND NATIONAL PROGRAMME IDENTIFICATION. Iceland CRIS decision number 2012/ Year 2012 EU contribution.

Floods Directive (2007/60/EC) : Reporting sheets Version November 2009

Foreword. Violeta BULC European Commissioner for Transport

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL HUMANITARIAN AID AND CIVIL PROTECTION - ECHO. Summary Report

TWINNING: A TESTED EXPERIENCE IN A BROADER EUROPEAN CONTEXT

ANNEX 3 ANNUAL ACTION PROGRAMME 2012 FOR UKRAINE PART 1 1. IDENTIFICATION

PART 1: DANUBE TRANSNATIONAL PROGRAMME

Summary of Findings, Recommendations and Lessons Learnt. 1st Meeting of the Programme Steering Committee. Chisinau, Moldova September 28 29, 2012

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Screening report Montenegro

Using EU financial instruments. European Commission

Council conclusions on the European Union Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region (EUSAIR)

Western Balkans and Europe 2020 Supporting Convergence and Growth

Inogate Annual Meeting 22 nd October 2014 Brussels

A comprehensive EU Climate Change Adaptation Strategy after 2013

Task 2: Strengthen the regional capacity and cooperation towards data and knowledge sharing on risks.)

EaP CSF Position Paper on NDICI

Bilateral screening: Chapter 27 PRESENTATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Action Fiche for Eastern Neighbourhood Civil Society Facility 2012 and 2013

DAC-code Sector Public Sector Policy and Administrative Management

European integration, development, and transition experience: bringing integration related development in the European neighborhood

Implementation of the EU strategy for the Danube region

RATIONALE AND CONTEXT

in the EU A new EU legal context on the assessment and management of flood water.europa.eu Maria Brättemark, WFD Team, DG ENV.D.1, European Commission

Cross-border Cooperation Action Programme Montenegro - Albania for the years

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN 2014/2161(BUD)

EaP SME Flagship Initiative

Commissioner for Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Management

Briefing Note: Checklist for Disaster Risk Reduction Legislation IFRC-UNDP Project (updated 14 March 2014) Overview

Progress on the Strengthening of the European Integration Structures

Norway 11. November 2013

Official web site of the Ministry:

Climate Change: Recent Developments in Adaptation Policy and Law

Transboundary flood risk management on the Rhine: From the Action Plan on Floods to the Floods Directive

PE-CONS 3619/3/01 REV 3

ECHO-JRC Project: Seveso Capacity Building in EU Neighbourhood Countries

Bilateral Guideline. EEA and Norwegian Financial Mechanisms

Priority Area 5: To Manage Environmental Risks Péter Bakonyi & Petra Szávics Hungary Romania

2017 EFDRR Open Forum Istanbul, Turkey March Concept Note of Technical Session. Monday, 27 March 2017, 16:00 18:00 hrs

Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism. (Text with EEA relevance)

ROADMAPS TO IMPLEMENT EACH THEMATIC ACTION FIELD

Draft speech for M. Karl-Heinz Lambertz First Vice-President European Committee of the Regions. 3rd EUSDR Danube Participation Day

Flood risk management plans the interlink between Floods Directive and Water Framework Directive a creative approach to authorities work

Danube Transnational Programme

The new EU Civil Protection legislation

REGULATION (EU) No 232/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 March 2014 establishing a European Neighbourhood Instrument

Twinning Projects. in the Field of Food and Agriculture

CONTENTS. Topic At A Glance A free trade area with the EU: what does it mean for Georgia? 4

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NORWEGIAN FINANCIAL MECHANISM between THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY,

FINANCING THE EU NEIGHBOURHOOD KEY FACTS AND FIGURES FOR THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP

Government Decree on Flood Risk Management 659/2010

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION. establishing an Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation. {SEC(2011) 1472 final} {SEC(2011) 1473 final}

Assessment of the risk of failure to reach the environmental objectives of the WFD in the Danube River Basin District

ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT

Compulsory versus Optional Disaster Insurance

Implementation of Water Framework and Flood Directive in Finland. Markku Maunula Finnish Environment Institute

United Nations Development Programme Country: Belarus Project Document

Directive 2007/60/EC. A new EU legal context on the assessment and management of flood risks. OJ L288, , p.27. water.europa.

European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument

Job Description and Requirements Programme Manager State-building and Governance Job no in the EU Delegation to the Republic of Yemen

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of adopting a

EUROPEAN COUNCIL Brussels, 26 March Delegations will find attached the conclusions of the European Council (25/26 March 2010).

Floods Directive (2007/60/EC) : Reporting sheets Endorsed by Water Directors : - 30 November December 2010

BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Study on Transfer Pricing and Developing countries

Bone Bolango, Indonesia

Second workshop on Transboundary Flood Risk Management, Geneva, March 2015

LIMITE EN CONFERENCE ON ACCESSION TO THE EUROPEAN UNION CROATIA. Brussels, 15 April 2011 AD 13/11 LIMITE CONF-HR 8

TAIEX AND TWINNING INSTRUMENTS FOR SHARING EU EXPERTISE

Official Journal of the European Union DECISIONS

Skardu, Pakistan. Local progress report on the implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action (First Cycle)

Geographical Overview The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership and Other Actors

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

TEXTS ADOPTED Provisional edition

Implementa)on of the Shared Environmental Informa)on System (SEIS) principles and prac)ces in the Eastern Partnership countries

Kathmandu, Nepal. Local progress report on the implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action (First Cycle)

FP7 ( ) Environment Programme (incl. Climate Change) International Cooperation

Geographic & Thematic Programming of EU aid

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 77/77

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Articles 31 and 32 thereof,

Annex 16 Template of Project Fiche for IPA programmes / component I - decentralised management

Project Fiche IPA centralised programmes Regional Programme on Disaster Risk Reduction in South-East Europe

POLAND. AT A GLANCE: Gross bilateral ODA (unless otherwise shown)

The approved ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. ESPON ECP Meeting 9-10 December 2015 in Luxembourg

Skardu, Pakistan. Local progress report on the implementation of the 10 Essentials for Making Cities Resilient (First Cycle)

A brief introduction to the Flood (Risk) Directive. Jan Verkade, M.A. Delft Hydraulics

Transcription:

Prevention, Preparedness and Response to Natural and Man-made Disasters in the Eastern Partnership Countries www.pprdeast2.eu www.facebook.com/pprdeast2/ EU FLOODS DIRECTIVE: SHARING A METHODICAL PROCESS TO IMPROVE FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT During the last EU CP Forum held in March 2018 in Brussels, the European Commissioner for Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Managements Mr Christos Stylianides made it clear for all participants that climate change is not a fake news. All countries need to be prepared to face more frequent disasters caused by natural hazards with various intensity, but always serious human, social and economic consequences. Floods are among these major risks that target Eastern Partner countries, and not only at national level. The cross-border dimension is inescapable, as all countries have at least one transnational river basin. The PPRD East 2 Programme provided a comprehensive support to the Partners Countries to understand, and in aligning their national legislation to the EU Floods Directive. From disasters to regulation The EU Floods Directive on the assessment and management of flood risks originates from a number of severe floods experienced between 1998 and 2009 in Europe, including the catastrophic ones along the Danube and Elbe rivers in summer 2002. Impact was massive: some 1126 deaths, the displacement of about half a million people and at least 52 billion in insured economic losses 1. In addition to economic and social damage, floods can have severe environmental consequences, for example when installations holding large quantities of toxic chemicals are inundated or wetland areas destroyed. All these consequences and respective experiences marked 2005 as a turning point: EU Member States decided to have joined actions in order to reduce and manage the risks that floods pose to human health, environment, cultural heritage and economic Copyrights: EC Flood events in Europe activity. The Directive 2007/60/EC was proposed by the European Commission in January 2006, and it came into force in 2007. 1 http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/flood_risk/index.htm This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the PPRD East 2 Team and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.

The cross-border dimension of flood risk at the heart of regional cooperation Since 2010, the PPRD East 2 Programme is cooperating with the Eastern Neighbourhood Partner Countries to support them in aligning their national legislation to the EU Floods Directive, and for Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, approximating it to the EU acquis communautaire. Within these efforts the Programme assists Partners Countries in their path towards the transposition and the implementation of the EU Floods Directive at different levels. Activities focus on capacity building actions, including the development of regional guidelines, sharing experiences and good practices, as well as national roadmaps for the transposition of the EU Floods Directive and the implementation of an integrated approach. After working together for more than three years, concrete and tangible progress can be noticed, both at regional and at national level. At regional level, and in addition to the regional guidelines, the Programme addressed flood risk management in transnational river basins by facilitating the development of a draft Flood Risk Management Protocol for the Transboundary Dniester River Basin. The Protocol is based on the principles of the EU Floods Directive and, when approved, will overcame the limitations of the existing agreement that mostly address floods response with limited attention to prevention and preparedness. Cross-border dimension of the flood risk is crucial in the region as all countries have at least one transnational river basin, explained Mr Marco Massabò, Flood Risk Management and Disaster Loss Data expert in the Copyrights: Getty image Floods in Europe PPRD East 2 Programme. Flood Risk Management in transnational river basins requires a high level of coordination and the Draft Protocol for Flood Risk Management for the Dniester River Basin can be a starting point to trigger bilateral and regional coordination. It can and should be used as an example for developing Flood Risk Management protocols in other transnational river basins, he added. At national level, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine are firmly going toward the approximation and implementation of EU Floods Directive, whereas Armenia and Azerbaijan have established a positive national dialogue among institutions for the modification of the national legal framework. Working together for a sustainable flood risk management In Armenia efforts are now focusing on introducing main provisions of EU Floods Directive in the national Water Code with the support of the PPRD East 2 Programme. In Azerbaijan an inter-institutional working group that involves several ministries and other Governmental organisations, intends to prepare a secondary legal act on Flood Risk Management in line with the EU Floods Directive. The approach adopted by Georgia for the approximation to EU Floods Directive consists of inclusion of the main provisions of the EU Floods Directive into Georgian national legislation and in developing methodologies for flood hazard and risk mapping as well as for Flood Risk Management Plans. The country tested a national Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment methodology on the pilot river basin Tskenitskali, a tributary of the Rioni river. The tests results will be used to develop the national Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment methodology as a secondary legislation. In Ukraine the New Water Code, approved in October 2016 by the Parliament, includes the main provision of the EU Floods Directive into national legislation. The Inter- Departmental Flood Risk Management Working Group has developed Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment and Flood Hazard and Risk Mapping methodologies and has completed a first preliminary flood risk assessment thus identifying the areas at significant risk of flooding in the entire country.

Copyrights: PPRD East 2 Programme Results of Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment and Areas of Potentially Significant Flood Risk delineation in Georgia In Moldova the EU Floods Directive has been transposed into national legislation. Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment, and Flood Hazard and Risk Mapping have been developed within the Flood Risk Management Project funded by the European Investment Bank. The review provided by the PPRD East 2 demonstrated that both the assessment and the mapping are fully in compliance with the EU Floods Directive requirements and with the EU good flood risk management practice. Based on this review, the next step for Moldova is to adopt the assessment and the mapping as the national referenced flood risk assessment methodology and mapping approach. Although each PPRD East 2 Partner Country is differently progressing in the reform of the flood risk management sector, all get involved into a national process for aligning their national legislation to the EU Floods Directive or to include principle and key provisions of the EU Floods Directive into national legislation. Needless to say, challenges remain for the future. Investing in disaster risk prevention is one of the challenges that all countries, including PPRD East 2 Partner Countries, are facing; international policies offer a good opportunity to Governments to fill the existing gaps in flood risk prevention, says Mr Massabò. In terms of legislation, the key point is to ensure the firm continuation of this process as well as the constant commitment of national authorities for reforming the legal and institutional flood risk management setting. Another challenge is the development of the capacity of public administration to prepare or evaluate flood hazard and risk maps as well as flood risk management plans because the implementation of the EU Floods Directive requires a number of multi-disciplinary competences and skills, stated Mr Massabò. Copyrights: Getty image Flooding in Central Europe

Preliminary flood risk assessment December 22, 2011 December 22, 2018 Flood hazard and flood risk mapping December 22, 2013 December 22, 2019 Copyrights: EC EU Floods Directive steps Flood risk management plans December 22, 2015 December 22, 2021 The EU Floods Directive requirements and implementation Implementation of the EU Floods Directive requires comprehensive national commitment. The Directive proposes a step-by-step implementation: preparing a preliminary flood risk assessment and an identification of areas of potential significant flood risk, developing flood hazard maps and flood risk maps for each identified area, and developing flood risk management plans for each unit of management. The full implementation of the three steps involves multiple institutions from water management organizations to local and river basin authorises as well as civil protection and disaster risk management institutions. The Directive also requires that the flood hazard and flood risk maps as well as flood risk management plans for cross-border river basins are prepared in cooperation and coordination with neighbouring countries. The EU Floods Directive implementation is also taking into consideration long term developments, including climate change and sustainable land use practices in the flood risk management cycle addressed in the Directive. EU Member States have finalized all three steps of the EU Floods Directive by 2015. To support the implementation of the Directive, a Working Group on Floods (Working Group F) has been established at the European Union level. In order to improve access to environmental information and reports, an electronic data and information system on water called WISE (Water Information System for Europe) 2 has been launched on 22 March 2007. The implementation of the EU Floods Directive steered a positive and constructive dialogue and cooperation among multiple institutions and stakeholders, encouraging coordination of local and national authorities, exchanging data and information within countries, with neighbourhoods and with the European Commission. 2 https://water.europa.eu

Accessibility to Flood Risk Information An important element of the EU Floods Directive is transparency towards the public. All prepared assessments, maps and plans are available to the public. Member States usually publish flood hazard and flood risk maps on national websites where they can be consulted or downloaded. The accessibility to disaster and flood risk assessment information is facilitated by utilisation of modern data management systems. These systems are providing the opportunity to different users to access disaster risk information simultaneously through the internet. One example of this technology is the Electronical Regional Risk Atlas (ERRA) developed within the EU funded PPRD East Programme. ERRA can serve as a data-hub for sharing disaster risk data and maps between all levels of institutions and organizations, and ultimately the general public. IT tools like ERRA have the distinct advantage to increase accessibility and comparability of disaster risk information among multiple stakeholders, but only if permanently maintained and updated content-wise, and regularly upgraded system-wise. Copyrights: PPRD East Programme ERRA Floods Map HIGHLIGHTS The six Partner Countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine) will benefit from an additional six months support from the PPRD East 2 Programme that has been extended until the end of May 2019 by the European Commission. This six months extension will allow further development and enhancement of Partner Countries national civil Copyrights: PPRD East 2 Programme 4th Steering Committee group photo protection and disaster risk management systems. Aligning national legislation to the EU disaster risk management acquis communautaire and good practice will be continued, as well as the strengthening of the regional cooperation among the Partner Countries and the efforts on bringing Partner Countries closer to the EU Civil Protection Mechanism. The 4th Steering Committee met under the new EC project management On 26 October 2018, the 4th Steering Committee brought together the Partner Countries members and the representatives of the European Commission under the new EC project management. Extended until May 2019, the PPRD East 2 Programme presented achievements made since the beginning and the activities planned to be implemented till the end of the Programme. This meeting also provided an opportunity for the Steering Committee members to express needs and expectations for the future and to discuss them with the European Commission and the Member States. An additional six-month support to the Partner Countries