Optimal investments under dynamic performance critria. Lecture IV

Similar documents
BACHELIER FINANCE SOCIETY. 4 th World Congress Tokyo, Investments and forward utilities. Thaleia Zariphopoulou The University of Texas at Austin

Optimal asset allocation under forward performance criteria Oberwolfach, February 2007

SPDE and portfolio choice (joint work with M. Musiela) Princeton University. Thaleia Zariphopoulou The University of Texas at Austin

Stochastic Partial Differential Equations and Portfolio Choice. Crete, May Thaleia Zariphopoulou

Spot and forward dynamic utilities. and their associated pricing systems. Thaleia Zariphopoulou. UT, Austin

Fourier Space Time-stepping Method for Option Pricing with Lévy Processes

Control Improvement for Jump-Diffusion Processes with Applications to Finance

Optimal liquidation with market parameter shift: a forward approach

13.3 A Stochastic Production Planning Model

Forward Dynamic Utility

M5MF6. Advanced Methods in Derivatives Pricing

Option pricing in the stochastic volatility model of Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard

Lecture 3: Review of mathematical finance and derivative pricing models

Optimal Execution: II. Trade Optimal Execution

Non-Time-Separable Utility: Habit Formation

Time-Consistent and Market-Consistent Actuarial Valuations

AMH4 - ADVANCED OPTION PRICING. Contents

Parameters Estimation in Stochastic Process Model

Expected utility models. and optimal investments. Lecture III

KØBENHAVNS UNIVERSITET (Blok 2, 2011/2012) Naturvidenskabelig kandidateksamen Continuous time finance (FinKont) TIME ALLOWED : 3 hours

STOCHASTIC INTEGRALS

Problem Set 3. Thomas Philippon. April 19, Human Wealth, Financial Wealth and Consumption

Robust Portfolio Choice and Indifference Valuation

Equity correlations implied by index options: estimation and model uncertainty analysis

Risk Neutral Valuation

Optimal Investment with Deferred Capital Gains Taxes

Portfolio Optimization Under Fixed Transaction Costs

QI SHANG: General Equilibrium Analysis of Portfolio Benchmarking

Implementing an Agent-Based General Equilibrium Model

Lecture 4. Finite difference and finite element methods

1 Dynamic programming

All Investors are Risk-averse Expected Utility Maximizers. Carole Bernard (UW), Jit Seng Chen (GGY) and Steven Vanduffel (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)

A note on the term structure of risk aversion in utility-based pricing systems

Pricing in markets modeled by general processes with independent increments

Incorporating Managerial Cash-Flow Estimates and Risk Aversion to Value Real Options Projects. The Fields Institute for Mathematical Sciences

A No-Arbitrage Theorem for Uncertain Stock Model

Volatility Smiles and Yield Frowns

An overview of some financial models using BSDE with enlarged filtrations

Exponential utility maximization under partial information

Hedging of Contingent Claims under Incomplete Information

Local Volatility Dynamic Models

An Introduction to Point Processes. from a. Martingale Point of View

Generalized Multi-Factor Commodity Spot Price Modeling through Dynamic Cournot Resource Extraction Models

Prospect Theory: A New Paradigm for Portfolio Choice

All Investors are Risk-averse Expected Utility Maximizers

Optimal Asset Allocation with Stochastic Interest Rates in Regime-switching Models

Risk Neutral Measures

The Life Cycle Model with Recursive Utility: Defined benefit vs defined contribution.

Household income risk, nominal frictions, and incomplete markets 1

Continuous-Time Consumption and Portfolio Choice

A Quadratic Gradient Equation for pricing Mortgage-Backed Securities

Functional vs Banach space stochastic calculus & strong-viscosity solutions to semilinear parabolic path-dependent PDEs.

Real Options and Game Theory in Incomplete Markets

Volatility Smiles and Yield Frowns

ECON 4325 Monetary Policy and Business Fluctuations

Part 1: q Theory and Irreversible Investment

Utility Indifference Pricing and Dynamic Programming Algorithm

Economathematics. Problem Sheet 1. Zbigniew Palmowski. Ws 2 dw s = 1 t

Effectiveness of CPPI Strategies under Discrete Time Trading

MAS452/MAS6052. MAS452/MAS Turn Over SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS. Stochastic Processes and Financial Mathematics

Local vs Non-local Forward Equations for Option Pricing

What Can Rational Investors Do About Excessive Volatility and Sentiment Fluctuations?

Hedging of swaptions in a Lévy driven Heath-Jarrow-Morton framework

Chapter 3: Black-Scholes Equation and Its Numerical Evaluation

Exponential utility maximization under partial information and sufficiency of information

MATH3075/3975 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS

Continuous Time Finance. Tomas Björk

Martingale representation theorem

A model for a large investor trading at market indifference prices

Lecture 1: Lévy processes

Robust Portfolio Decisions for Financial Institutions

Sparse Wavelet Methods for Option Pricing under Lévy Stochastic Volatility models

Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 2

An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model

Slides for DN2281, KTH 1

A Model with Costly-State Verification

Multiple Defaults and Counterparty Risks by Density Approach

Utility indifference valuation for non-smooth payoffs on a market with some non tradable assets

2.1 Mean-variance Analysis: Single-period Model

Valuing volatility and variance swaps for a non-gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck stochastic volatility model

Menu Costs and Phillips Curve by Mikhail Golosov and Robert Lucas. JPE (2007)

Exercises on the New-Keynesian Model

On Using Shadow Prices in Portfolio optimization with Transaction Costs

Indifference fee rate 1

( ) since this is the benefit of buying the asset at the strike price rather

Risk, Return, and Ross Recovery

VII. Incomplete Markets. Tomas Björk

Homework 3: Asset Pricing

Convexity Theory for the Term Structure Equation

Non-semimartingales in finance

Stochastic Differential equations as applied to pricing of options

Optimal Securitization via Impulse Control

Dynamic Replication of Non-Maturing Assets and Liabilities

Life-Cycle Models with Stock and Labor Market. Cointegration: Insights from Analytical Solutions

Optimal Acquisition of a Partially Hedgeable House

4. Black-Scholes Models and PDEs. Math6911 S08, HM Zhu

Real Options and Free-Boundary Problem: A Variational View

Satya P. Das NIPFP) Open Economy Keynesian Macro: CGG (2001, 2002), Obstfeld-Rogoff Redux Model 1 / 18

Valuation of derivative assets Lecture 6

Equilibrium Models with Transaction Costs I

Transcription:

Optimal investments under dynamic performance critria Lecture IV 1

Utility-based measurement of performance 2

Deterministic environment Utility traits u(x, t) : x wealth and t time Monotonicity u x (x, t) > Risk aversion u xx (x, t) < Impatience u t (x, t) < Fisher (1913, 1918), Koopmans (1951), Koopmans-Diamond-Williamson (1964)... 3

Stochastic environment Important ingredients Time evolution concurrent with the one of the investment universe Consistency with up to date information Incorporation of available opportunities and constraints Meaningful optimal utility volume 4

Dynamic utility U(x, t) is an F t -adapted process As a function of x, U is increasing and concave For each self-financing strategy, represented by π, the associated (discounted) wealth X t satisfies E P (U(X π t,t) F s ) U(X π s,s) s t There exists a self-financing strategy, represented by π,forwhich the associated (discounted) wealth Xt π satisfies E P (U(Xt π,t) F s ) = U(Xs π,s) s t 5

Traditional framework A deterministic utility datum u T (x) is assigned at the end of a fixed investment horizon U(x, T )=u T (x) Backwards in time generation of optimal utility volume V (x, t) =sup π E P (u(x π T,T) F t; X π t = x) V (x, t) =sup π E P (V (X π s,s) F t ; X π t = x) (DPP) V (x, t) =E P (V (Xs π,s) F t ; Xt π = x) U(x, t) V (x, t) t<t The dynamic utility coincides with the traditional value function 6

A deterministic utility datum u (x) is assigned at the beginning of the trading horizon, t = U(x, ) = u (x) Forward in time generation of optimal utility volume U(X π s,s)=e P (U(X π t,t) F s ) s t Dynamic utility can be defined for all trading horizons Utility and allocations take a very intuitive form Difficulties due to the inverse in time nature of the problem Utility is not exogeneously given but is implied/calibrated w.r.t. investment opportunities 7

Motivational examples 8

An incomplete multiperiod binomial example Exponential utility datum Traded security: S t,t=, 1,... ξ t+1 = S t+1 S t,ξ t+1 = ξ d t+1,ξu t+1 with <ξ d t+1 < 1 <ξu t+1 Second traded asset is riskless yielding zero interest rate Stochastic factor: Y t,t=, 1,... η t+1 = Y t+1 Y t,η t+1 = η d t+1,ηu t+1 with η d t <η u t Probability space (Ω, (F t ), P) {S t,y t : t =, 1,...} : a two-dimensional stochastic process 9

State wealth process: X t, t = s +1,s+2,...,... α i : the number of shares of the traded security held in this portfolio over thetimeperiod[i 1,i] X t = X s + t i=s+1 α i S i Forward dynamic exponential utility U(X α s,s)=e P (U(X α t,t) F s ) U(x, ) = e γx, γ > 1

A forward dynamic utility U(x, t) = e γx if t = e γx+ t i=1 h i if t 1 Auxiliary quantities : local entropies h i with h i = q i log q i P (A i F i 1 ) +(1 q i)log 1 q i 1 P (A i F i 1 ) A i = {ξ i = ξ u i } and q i = Q (A i F i 1 ) for i =, 1,.. and Q being the minimal relative entropy measure 11

Important insights The forward utility process U(x, t) = e γx+ t i=1 h i is of the form U(x, t) =u(x, A t ) where u(x, t) is the deterministic utility function u(x, t) = e γx+1 2 t and A t corresponds to a time change depending on the market input A t =2 t h i i=1 12

Important insights (continued) The variational utility input u(x, t) = e γx+1 2 t solves the partial differential equation u t u xx = 1 2 u2 x u(x, ) = e γx The stochastic market input A t =2 t h i i=1 plays now the role of time. It depends exclusively on the market parameters. 13

A continuous-time example Investment opportunities Riskless bond : r = Risky security : ds t = σ t S t (λ t dt + dw t ) Utility datum at t =: u (x) Wealth process dx t = σ t π t (λ t dt + dw t ) X = x Market input : λ t, A t da t = λ 2 t dt A = 14

Building the martingale U(Xt π,t) Assume that we can construct U(x, t) via U(Xt π,t)=u(xt π,a t ) U(x, ) = u(x, ) = u (x) where u(x, t) is the variational utility input and A t the stochastic market input du(xt π,t)=u x(x t,a t )σ t π t dw t +(u t (Xt π,a t)λ 2 t + u x(xt π,a t)σ t π t λ t + 1 2 u xx(xt π,a t)σt 2π2 t )dt }{{} 15

Variational utility input condition u t u xx = 1 2 u2 x u(x, ) = u (x) The optimal allocations in stock, π t π t = σ 1 t π, t = X π t, and in bond, π, t, u x (X λ t π,a t ) t u xx (X π,a t ) = σ 1 t λ t R t t σt 1 λ t R t R t = r(x π t,a t ) ; r(x, t) = u x(x, t) u xx (x, t) The local risk tolerance r(x, t) and the subordinated risk tolerance process R t emerge as important quantities 18

Dynamic utility measurement time t 1,informationF t1 asset returns 11 constraints 19.8 market view away from equilibrium benchmark calendar time numeraire subordination 19.6 19.4 19.2 19 1 u(x,t 1 ).8.6.4 Time.2.2.4.6 Wealth.8 1 MI(t 1 ) + u(x, t 1 ) U(x, t 1 ; MI) F t1 π(x, t 1 ; MI) F t1 19

Dynamic utility measurement time t 2,informationF t2 asset returns constraints market view away from equilibrium benchmark numeraire 11 15 1 95 u(x,t 2 ) calendar time subordination 9 1.8.6.4 Time.2.2.4.6 Wealth.8 1 MI(t 2 ) + u(x, t 2 ) U(x, t 2 ; MI) F t2 π(x, t 2 ; MI) F t2 2

Dynamic utility measurement time t 3,informationF t3 asset returns 11 constraints market view away from equilibrium benchmark calendar time numeraire subordination 15 1 95 9 85 8 75 u(x,t 3 ) 1.8.6.4.2 Time.2.4.6 Wealth.8 1 MI(t 3 ) + u(x, t 3 ) U(x, t 3 ; MI) F t3 π(x, t 3 ; MI) F t3 21

Dynamic utility measurement time t, informationf t u(x,t) asset returns additional market input Time Wealth MI(t) + u(x, t) U(X t,t) F t π (X t,t) F t 22

Dynamic utility measurement time t 1,informationF t1 u(x,t) asset returns additional market input Time Wealth MI(t 1 ) + u(x, t 1 ) U(X t 1,t 1 ) F t1 π (X t 1,t 1 ) F t1 23

Dynamic utility measurement time t 2,informationF t2 u(x,t) asset returns additional market input Time Wealth MI(t 2 ) + u(x, t 2 ) U(X t 2,t 2 ) F t2 π (X t 2,t 2 ) F t2 24

Dynamic utility measurement time t 3,informationF t3 u(x,t) asset returns additional market input Time Wealth MI(t 3 ) + u(x, t 3 ) U(X t 3,t 3 ) F t3 π (X t 3,t 3 ) F t3 25

Construction of a class of forward dynamic utilities 24

Creating the martingale that yields the optimal utility volume Minimal model assumptions Stochastic optimization problem inverse in time Key idea Stochastic input Market Variational input Individual Maximal utility Optimal allocation 25

Variational input utility surfaces 26

Utility surface A model independent variational constraint on impatience, risk aversion and monotonicity Initial utility datum u (x) =u(x, ) Fully non-linear pde u t u xx = 1 2 u2 x u(x, ) = u (x) 27

Utility transport equation The utility equation can be alternatively viewed as a transport equation with slope of its characteristics equal to (half of) the risk tolerance r(x, t) = u x(x, t) u xx (x, t) u t + 1 2 r(x, t)u x = u(x, ) = u (x) Characteristic curves: dx(t) dt = 1 2 r(x(t),t) 28

Construction of utility surface u(x, t) using characteristics dx(t) dt = 1 2 r(x(t),t) Utility datum u (x) 29

Construction of characteristics dx(t) dt = 1 2 r(x(t),t) Utility datum u(x, ) Characteristic curves 3

Propagation of utility datum along characteristics 31

Propagation of utility datum along characteristics 32

Utility surface u(x, t) 33

Two related pdes Fast diffusion equation for risk tolerance r t + 1 2 r2 r xx = r(x, ) = r (x) (FDE) Conductivity : r 2 Porous medium equation for risk aversion γ t = γ(x, t) = 1 r(x, t) ( ) 1 γ xx γ(x, ) = 1 r (x) (PME) Pressure : r 2 and (PME) exponent: m = 1 34

Difficulties Utility equation: u t u xx = 1 2 u2 x Inverse problem and fully nonlinear Utility transport equation: u t + 1 2 r(x, t)u x = Shocks, solutions past singularities Fast diffusion equation: r t + 1 2 r2 r xx = Inverse problem and backward parabolic, solutions might not exist, locally integrable data might not produce locally bounded slns in finite time Porous medium equation: γ t =( γ 1) xx Majority of results for (PME), γ t =(γ m ) xx, are for m>1, partialresultsfor 1 <m< 35

A rich class of risk tolerance inputs Addititively separable risk tolerance r 2 (x, t; α, β) =m(x; α, β)+n(t; α, β) m(x; α, β) =αx 2 r(x, t; α, β) = Example n(x; α, β) =βe αt αx 2 + βe αt α, β > (Very) special cases r(x, t;,β)= β u(x, t) = e x β + t 2 r(x, t;1, ) = x u(x, t) =log x t 2 r(x, t; α, ) = α x u(x, t) = γ 1xγ e 2(1 γ) t, γ = α 1 γ α 36

Risk tolerance r(x, t) =.5x 2 +15.5e.5t 4.2 4.1 4 3.9 3.8 1.8.6 Time.4.2 1 5 Wealth 5 1 37

Utility surface u(x, t) generated by risk tolerance r(x, t) =.5x 2 +15.5e.5t 2 4 6 8 1 6 4 Time 2.5 1 1.5 Wealth 2 2.5 Characteristics: dx(t) dt = 1 2.5x(t) 2 +15.5e.5t 38

Risk tolerance r(x, t) = 1x 2 + e 1t 2.2 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.8 1.8.6 Time.4.2 1 5 Wealth 5 1 39

Utility surface u(x, t) generated by risk tolerance r(x, t) = 1x 2 + e 1t.26.24.22.2.18.16.14.12 1.5 1.5 5 1 15 Time Wealth Characteristics: dx(t) dt = 1 2 1x(t) 2 + e 1t 4

Risk tolerance r(x, t;, 1) = x 2 +1=1 2 1.5 1.5 1.8.6 Time.4.2 1 5 Wealth 5 1 41

Utility surface u(x, t) = e x+ t 2 generated by risk tolerance r(x, t) =1 2 4 6 8 1 6 4 Time 2.5 1 1.5 Wealth 2 2.5 Characteristics: dx(t) dt = 1 2 42

Risk tolerance r(x, t;1, ) = x 2 +e t = x 6 5 4 3 2 1 1.8.6 Time.4.2 1 5 Wealth 5 1 43

Utility surface u(x, t) =logx 2 t, x> generated by risk tolerance r(x) =x 4 2 2 4 6 6 4 Time 2 5 1 Wealth 15 2 Characteristics: dx(t) dt = 1 2 x(t) 44

Risk tolerance r(x, t;4, ) = 4x 2 +e 4t =2 x 6 5 4 3 2 1 1.8.6 Time.4.2 1 5 Wealth 5 1 45

Utility surface u(x, t) =2 xe t 2, x> generated by risk tolerance r(x, t) =2x.12.11.1.9.8 1.5 1 Time.5 5 1 Wealth 15 2 Characteristics: dx(t) dt = x(t) 46

Multiplicatively separable risk tolerance r(x, t; α, β) =m(x; α)n(t; β) Example m(x; α) =ϕ(φ 1 (x; α)) n(t; β) = 1 t + β, β > Φ(x; α) = x α ez2 /2 dz ϕ =Φ r(x, t; α, β) =ϕ(φ 1 (x; α)) (Very) special cases m(x; α) =α, n(t; β) =1 u(x, t) = e x α + 2 t m(x; α) =x, n(t; β) =1 u(x, t) =log x 2 t m(x; α) =αx, n(t; β) =1 u(x, t) = 1 γ xγ e γ 2(1 γ) t, γ = α 1 α

Risk tolerance r(x, t) = ϕ(φ 1 (x;.5) t +5.2.15.1.5 1.5 1 Time.5 5 1 Wealth 15 2 48

Utility surface u(x, t) =Φ(Φ 1 (x;.5) t +5) generated by risk tolerance r(x, t) = ϕ(φ 1 (x;.5)) t +5 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 Time.5 5 1 Wealth 15 2 Characteristics: dx(t) dt = ϕ(φ 1 (x(t);.5)) t +5 49

Utility function u(x, t ) (fixed time) t =2 5 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 Utility 4 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 Wealth 5

Utility function u(x,t) (fixed wealth level) x =3.5 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 Utility 3 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Time 51

Summary on variational utility input Key state variables: wealth and risk tolerance Risk tolerance solves a fast diffusion equation posed inversely in time r t + 1 2 r2 r xx = r(x, ) = u (x) u (x) Utility surface generated by a transport equation u t + 1 2 r(x, t)u x = u(x, ) = u (x) Forward dynamic utility process constructed by compiling variational utility input and stochastic market input 52