Multiple Defaults and Counterparty Risks by Density Approach
|
|
- Mark Butler
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Multiple Defaults and Counterparty Risks by Density Approach Ying JIAO Université Paris 7 This presentation is based on joint works with N. El Karoui, M. Jeanblanc and H. Pham
2 Introduction Motivation : study the impact of default events on the markets and the roles of different information using the density approach of default Applications : modelling of multiple defaults and optimal investment with counterparty risks Main ideas : we need the whole term structure of the conditional density the intensity hypothesis is not enough! decompose suitably the initial problem in the global filtration using the before-default and after-default analysis each decomposed problem is solved in the reference default free filtration
3 The progressive enlargement of filtration plays an essential role in the credit risk modelling On the market (Ω, A, P): the default information σ(τ t) and the default-free information F = (F t ) t 0. The global information G = (G t ) t 0 G t = F t σ(τ t). Key remark: any G t -measurable random variable Yt G is written in the form Y G t = Y t 1 {t τ} + Y t (τ)1 {t>τ}, where Y t is F t - measurable and Y t (θ) is F t B(R + )- measurable.
4 For single credit name, the pricing of a default sensitive claim consists of computing the conditional expectation w.r.t. G under some risk-neutral probability. Most credit derivatives cease to exist once the default occurs. So classically, the pricing is on the set {t < τ}. The idea (e.g. Bielecki-Jeanblanc-Rutkowski) is to establish an explicit relationship between the G and the F conditional expectations Key Lemma (Dellacherie-Meyer, Jeulin-Yor): for any A-measurable r.v. Y, 1 {τ>t} E[Y G t ] = 1 {τ>t} E[Y1 {τ>t} F t ] P(τ > t F t ) a.s. (1) on the set A = {S t := P(τ > t F t ) > 0}.
5 Default density approach To study the impact of a default on the market and the multiple defaults, we are interested in what happens after a default, i.e. on {t τ}. Adopting the conditional density of default is suitable for the after-default studies. Similar to the Jacod s hypothesis in the initial enlargement of filtration. Density Hypothesis For any t 0, there exists a family of F t B(R + ) r.v. α t (θ) s.t. for any bounded Borel function f on R +, E[f(τ) F t ] = 0 f(θ)α t (θ)dθ a.s.
6 After-default pricing Let Y T (θ) be a bounded F T B(R + ) r.v., T,θ 0. Then for any t T, on A θ = {α t (θ) > 0}, E [ Y(T,θ)α T (θ) ] F t 1 {τ t} E[Y T (τ) G t ] = 1 {τ t}, a.s. α t (θ) θ=τ (2) The after-default density α t (θ), t θ is needed. Under the H-hypothesis, P(τ > t F t ) = P(τ > t F ), so α t (t) = α T (t), T t. The before-default density implies the whole term structure. In the general case, the after-default density requires more information and the change of probability measure is useful.
7 After-default density without H-hypothesis We begin from a probability measure P where the H-hypothesis holds. Let (N t := 1 {τ t} Λ G t, t 0) be the (G, P)-martingale of pure jump and assume the intensity hypothesis, i.e., Λ G t = t 0 λg s ds = t τ 0 λ s ds where λ is F-adapted. The intensity satisfies λ t = α t (t)/s t. The density of τ under P is α t (θ) = E[α θ (θ) F t ] = E[λ θ S θ F t ] = E[λ θ e Λ θ F t ] t,θ 0. Suppose that F is generated by a Brownian motion W. Then W is also a (G, P)-Brownian motion.
8 Our aim is to find the after-default density under a probability Q where H-hypothesis is not satisfied. By the martingale representation theorem in G (Kusuoka), any positive martingale Q with expectation 1 can be written as the solution of a SDE dq t = Q t (Ψ t dw t + Φ t dn t ), Q 0 = 1 where Ψ and Φ, Φ > 1, are G-predictable processes. Using the decomposed form Ψ t = ψ t 1 {t τ} +ψ t (τ)1 {t>τ} and Φ t = φ t 1 {t τ} +φ t (τ)1 {t>τ}, it follows Q t = q t 1 {t<τ} + q t (τ)1 {t τ} where q t = exp ( t ψ u dw u t 0 ψ 2 udu q t (θ) = q θ (θ) exp ( t ψ u (θ)dw u 1 2 with q θ (θ) = q θ (1 + φ θ ). θ t θ t 0 λ u φ u du ), t 0 ψ u (θ) 2 du ), t θ.
9 The restriction of Q on F is given by t Qt F = E[Q t F t ] = q t S t + q t (u)λ u S u du. 0 Let Q be the probability measure defined by dq = Q t dp on G t. Then α Q t (θ) = α Q t (θ) = 1 Q F t 1 Q F t q t (θ)α θ (θ), t θ E P [α Q θ (θ) F t] = 1 Q F t E P [q θ (1 + φ θ )α θ (θ) F t ], t < θ.
10 Remarks The pricing problem is composed into a before-default one and a after-default one. The initial problem concerns the global information G. The two decomposed pricing formulas are related to the default-free information F. The density process is F-adapted. The filtration F is more familier to work with. This general decomposition methodology is useful to deal with multiple defaults and counterparty risks.
11 Modelling Successive Defaults
12 Introduction The before-default and after-default analysis adapts naturally to study the ordered default events in a recursive manner. For the pricing of credit portfolio derivatives such as basket default swaps and CDOs, it suffices to consider the ordered defaults. Links between the top-down models and bottom-up models of multiple credit modelling.
13 Default information We consider a family of random times (τ 1,,τ n ) on (Ω, A, P), whose increasing-ordered permutation is σ 1 σ 2 σ n. Denote by D i = (Dt i) t 0 the filtration associated with σ i and by D (i) = (D (i) t ) t 0 := D 1 D i. Let G (i) = (G (i) t ) t 0 := F D (i) and define for convenience G (0) = F. Market full information : G (n)
14 Ordered defaults and loss process In the top-down models, one works with the cumulative loss of the underlying portfolio defined by L t := n i=1 1 {τi t}. Loss information: D L = (D L t ) t 0 where D L t = σ(l s, s t) including the loss value and the timing of jumps of the loss process. It holds L t = n i=1 1 {σi t}. The same information flow as the ordered defaults: D (n) t = D L t, t 0.
15 Joint density Joint Density Hypothesis for σ = (σ 1,,σ n ): there exists a family of F t B(R n +)-measurable functions (ω, u) α t (u) where u = (u 1,, u n ) R n +, such that for any bounded Borel function f : R n + R, E[f(σ) F t ] = f(u)α t (u)du, t 0. R n + Remark: α(u) is null outside the set {u 1 u n }. The marginal density of σ (k) := (σ 1,,σ k ) is given by α (k) ( ) t u(k) = α t (u)d(u (>k) ) R n k + where d ( u (>k) ) = duk+1 du n.
16 Pricing of credit portfolio derivatives Payoff of credit portfolio derivatives k th -to-default swap: Y T (σ) = 1 {σk >T } CDO tranche: Y T (σ) = (L T k) + = ( n i=1 1 {σi T } k) + Let T t 0 and Y T (σ) be a positive F T B(R n +)-measurable function on Ω R n +, then E[Y T (σ) G (n) t ] = n i=0 1 {σi t<σ i+1 } ]t, [ d(u (>i)) E[Y T (u)α T (u) F t ] ]t, [ d(u (>i))α t (u) where u (i) = (u 1,, u i ) and σ (i) = (σ 1,,σ i ). The prices depend on the number and the occurrence timing of defaults. u(i) =σ (i)
17 Loss intensity and successive default intensities The loss intensity is the G L -adapted process λ L such that (L t t 0 λl sds, t 0) is a G L -martingale. The G (k) -intensity of σ k is the G (k) -adapted process λ k such that (1 {σk t} t 0 λk sds, t 0) is a G (k) -martingale. The G (k) -intensity of σ k coincides with its G (n) -intensity, it is null outside the set {σ k 1 t < σ k } and is given as λ k t = 1 {σk 1 t<σ k }λ k,f ( ) t σ(k 1) where λ k,f ( ) t u(k 1) is Ft B(R k 1 + )-measurable. The loss intensity is the sum of the intensities of σ k, i.e. n λ L t = λ k t, k=1 a.s..
18 Joint density and successive intensities Under a probability P where H-hypothesis holds between F and G (n), then for any θ R n + such that θ 1 θ n and any 0 t θ n, [ n α t (θ) = E λ i,f ( ) { θi θ θ(i 1) i exp λ i,f ( ) } ] u θ(i 1) du Ft θ i 1 i=1 a.s.. If t > θ n, then α t (θ) = α θn (θ). To obtain the whole term structure of the joint density in the general case, it needs a change of probability measure on G (n) and more information.
19 Bottom-up vs top-down The ordered joint density of σ can be deduced from the non-ordered one of τ = (τ 1,,τ n ).. Denote by β t (θ), t 0, θ = (θ 1,,θ n ) R n +, the joint density of τ. For any θ R n + such that θ 1 θ n, ( ) α t (θ 1,,θ n ) = 1 {θ1 θ n} β t θπ(1),,θ Π(n) where (Π(1),,Π(n)) is a permutation of (1,, n). In particular, if τ is exchangeable, then α t (θ 1,,θ n ) = 1 {θ1 θ n} n! β t (θ 1,,θ n ). Π
20 Joint density models Two important points: compatibility between the joint probability property and the martingale property describe the correlation structure in a dynamic manner An example: how to diffuse a copula model. When t = 0, G 0 (u) = exp( ( n i=1 u2 i ) 1/2 ), which is a c.d.f. of n uni-exponential r.v. linked by a Clayton copula. The conditional probability : ( G t (u) = exp ( n ) ui 2 Mt) i 1/2 A t t 0 where A t = 1 2+X 1/2 s 8 d X X 3/2 s and X s = n i=1 u2 i Mt i s with M i being positive F-martingales such that M0 i = 1 and M i, M j > 0 if i j. t i=1
21 Optimal Investment with Counterparty Risks
22 Introduction The counterparty default risks is often modelled in the literature by the contagion intensity jump (Jarrow-Yu, Crepey-Jeanblanc-Zargari, Herbertsson). We consider a utility maximization problem where the asset value jumps at the default of the counterparty. The aim is to analyze the counterparty risk in optimal investment and measure the impact of default on trading strategy.
23 Asset model Asset value S governed by ds t = S t (µ t dt + σ t dw t γ t dd t ), 0 t T, where µ, σ > 0 and γ are G-predictable processes satisfying T 0 µ t σ t 2 dt + T 0 σ t 2 dt < a.s., D t = 1 τ t and < γ t < 1. Since γ < 1, the asset continues to exist after default. S t = St F1 t<τ + St d(τ)1 t τ, where S F is the price in the market before default: ds F t = St F ( µ F t dt + σt F ) dw t, 0 t T, and S d (θ) is the price after default at τ = θ: ds d t (θ) = Sd t (θ)( µ d t (θ)dt + σd t (θ)dw t), θ < t T, with the initial value S d θ (θ) = SF θ (1 γ θ).
24 Portfolio and wealth process A trading strategy is a G-predictable process π, representing the proportion of wealth invested in the risky asset, with corresponding wealth process: ds t dx t = π t X t, 0 t T. S t By writing π in the form: π t = π F t 1 t τ + π d t (τ)1 t>τ, X t = X F t 1 t<τ + X d t (τ)1 t τ, where X F is the wealth process in the market before default: dxt F = πt F Xt F dst F St F, 0 t T,
25 Portfolio and wealth process after default X d (θ) is the wealth in the market after default at τ = θ: dx d t (θ) = π d t (θ)x d t (θ) dsd t (θ) S d t (θ) X d θ (θ) = X F θ (1 πf θ γ θ). θ < t T We say that a trading strategy π is admissible, denote by π A, if T 0 π t σ t 2 dt <, and π t γ t < 1 a.s. For π A, the wealth process remains strictly positive.
26 The utility maximization problem Given a utility function U strictly increasing, strictly concave and C 1 on (0, ), and satisfying the Inada conditions U (0 + ) =, U ( ) = 0, we consider V 0 = sup J 0 (π) := sup E[U(X T )]. (3) π A π A Incomplete market due to jump default process. Existence and uniqueness of a solution by duality method from general results of Kramkov-Schachermayer Problem (3) recently studied by dynamic programming methods and BSDE in the G-filtration under H-hypothesis by Lim-Quenez. Similar problem by Ankirchner-Blanchet-Scalliet-Eyraud-Loisel
27 Derivation of the decomposition Density approach Explicit solutions with qualitative and quantitative descriptions of the optimal trading strategy, especially w.r.t. the Merton (default-free) strategy. By the law of conditional expectations, and under the density hypothesis, we get J 0 (π) = E [ E[U(X T ) F T ] ] = E [ U(XT F )P[τ > T F T] + E[U(XT d (τ))1 τ T F T ] ] [ T ] = E U(XT F )S T + U(XT d (θ))α T(θ)dθ, 0 where S T = P[τ > T F T ] = T α T(θ)dθ is the conditional survival probability at T.
28 Decomposition theorem Let us introduce the value-function process of the after-default" optimization problem: for (θ, x) [0, T] (0, ), V d θ (x) = ess sup E [ U(X d,x T (θ))α T(θ) ] Fθ. (4) π d (θ) A d (θ) Theorem [ V 0 = sup E U(XT F )S T + π F A F T 0 ] Vθ d (X θ F (1 πf θ γ θ))dθ. (5)
29 Two optimization problems in the complete market. For the after-default problem, Time-inconsistent control problem where the coefficients (µ d (θ), σ d (θ)) depend on the initial time θ density term α T (θ) weighting the utility U We adapt a martingale duality method for solving (4) For the global before-default problem, a dynamic programming type relation (5) backward resolution from the after-default" one, both solved with respect to F The optimal trading strategy is given by ˆπ t = ˆπ F t 1 t τ + ˆπ d t (τ)1 t>τ, 0 t T, where ˆπ F is an optimal control to (4), and ˆπ d (θ) is an optimal control to V d θ (ˆX F θ (1 ˆπF θ γ θ)).
30 Solution to the after-default utility maximization The (local) martingale density of the after-default market: ( t µ d u Z t (θ) = exp (θ) θ σu(θ) d dw u 1 t 2 θ The optimal value process is µd u (θ) σu(θ) d 2 du ( ( Vθ [U d (x) = E I ŷ θ (x) Z )) T(θ) α T (θ) F θ ]. α T (θ) ), θ t T. The corresponding optimal wealth process is equal to: [ ˆX d,x ZT (θ) ( t (θ) = E Z t (θ) I ŷ θ (x) Z T(θ) α T (θ) ) Ft ], θ t T, (6) where I = (U ) 1, and ŷ θ (x) > 0 is F θ B((0, ))- d,x measurable random variable solution to ˆX θ (θ) = x.
31 The global before-default optimization problem In the case of CRRA utility functions: U(x) = xp p for p < 1, p 0, we solve explicitly [ T ] V 0 = sup E U(XT F )S T + Vθ d (X θ F (1 πf θ γ θ))dθ π F A F 0 for which V d θ (x) = U(x)K p θ with K θ = ( [ E α T (θ) ( ZT (θ) α T (θ) ) q Fθ ]) 1 q and q = p 1 p.
32 Theorem (1) V 0 = U(X 0 )Y 0, where Y is strictly positive, and (Y,φ) is the smallest (resp. largest) solution when p > 0 (resp. p < 0), in L b + (F) L2 loc (W) to the BSDE: T T Y t = G T + f(θ, Y θ,φ θ )dθ φ θ dw θ, 0 t T, (7) t t where f(t, Y t,φ t ) = p ess sup πγ t <1 [ (µ F t Y t + σ F t φ t )π 1 p 2 Y t πσ F t 2 + K p t (1 πγ t ) p Remark. We recover Merton value with: G T = 1, K t = 0. p ],
33 (2) The optimal strategy is given by: ˆπ F t [ = arg max (µ F t Y t + σt F φ t )π 1 p πγ t <1 (1 πγ t ) p + K p t p 2 Y t πσ F t 2 ], 0 t T,
34 Numerical illustrations Tests with CRRA utility function U(x) = xp p, p < 1, p 0. At default: γ constant, τ independent of F and τ exp(λ): α t (θ) = α(θ) and S(t) = P(τ > t) = e λt. For γ > 0 (loss at default), we take µ d (θ) = µ F θ T and σ d (θ) = σ F( ) 2 θ T, θ [0, T]. For γ < 0 (gain at default), we take µ d (θ) = µ F( ) 2 θ T and σ d (θ) = σ F (2 θ T ), θ [0, T], µ F = 0.03, σ F = 0.2, T = 1 The after-default optimal strategy: ˆπ d (θ) = µ d (θ) (1 p) σ d (θ) 2. No closed-form solution for the global problem: numerical resolution by Howard algorithm.
35 Optimal stragegy in function of the jump size γ Figure: Optimal strategy vs Merton: p = 0.2, λ = 0.01 and 0.3 respectively. 4 3 Pi Merton Pi F with lambda=0.01 Pi F with lambda= gamma
36 References N. El Karoui, M. Jeanblanc and Y. Jiao (2009), What happens after the default: the conditional density approach, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 120(7), N. El Karoui, M. Jeanblanc and Y. Jiao (2010), Modelling successive default events, working paper. Y. Jiao (2009), Multiple defaults and contagion risks with global and default-free information, working paper. Y. Jiao and H. Pham (2009), Optimal investment with counterparty risks: a default-density model approach, to appear in Finance and Stochastics.
37 Thank you very much for your attention!
An overview of some financial models using BSDE with enlarged filtrations
An overview of some financial models using BSDE with enlarged filtrations Anne EYRAUD-LOISEL Workshop : Enlargement of Filtrations and Applications to Finance and Insurance May 31st - June 4th, 2010, Jena
More informationAsymmetric information in trading against disorderly liquidation of a large position.
Asymmetric information in trading against disorderly liquidation of a large position. Caroline Hillairet 1 Cody Hyndman 2 Ying Jiao 3 Renjie Wang 2 1 ENSAE ParisTech Crest, France 2 Concordia University,
More informationExponential utility maximization under partial information
Exponential utility maximization under partial information Marina Santacroce Politecnico di Torino Joint work with M. Mania AMaMeF 5-1 May, 28 Pitesti, May 1th, 28 Outline Expected utility maximization
More informationPDE Approach to Credit Derivatives
PDE Approach to Credit Derivatives Marek Rutkowski School of Mathematics and Statistics University of New South Wales Joint work with T. Bielecki, M. Jeanblanc and K. Yousiph Seminar 26 September, 2007
More informationHedging of Credit Derivatives in Models with Totally Unexpected Default
Hedging of Credit Derivatives in Models with Totally Unexpected Default T. Bielecki, M. Jeanblanc and M. Rutkowski Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, 6 February 2006 1 Based on N. Vaillant (2001) A
More informationA Portfolio Optimization Problem with Stochastic Interest Rate and a Defaultable Bond
A Portfolio Optimization Problem with Stochastic Interest Rate and a Defaultable Bond Bogdan IFTIMIE "Simion Stoilow" Institute of Mathematics of the Romanian Academy October 7, 2011, IMAR, Bucharest Conferinţa
More informationSPDE and portfolio choice (joint work with M. Musiela) Princeton University. Thaleia Zariphopoulou The University of Texas at Austin
SPDE and portfolio choice (joint work with M. Musiela) Princeton University November 2007 Thaleia Zariphopoulou The University of Texas at Austin 1 Performance measurement of investment strategies 2 Market
More informationExponential utility maximization under partial information and sufficiency of information
Exponential utility maximization under partial information and sufficiency of information Marina Santacroce Politecnico di Torino Joint work with M. Mania WORKSHOP FINANCE and INSURANCE March 16-2, Jena
More informationChanges of the filtration and the default event risk premium
Changes of the filtration and the default event risk premium Department of Banking and Finance University of Zurich April 22 2013 Math Finance Colloquium USC Change of the probability measure Change of
More informationCredit Risk in Lévy Libor Modeling: Rating Based Approach
Credit Risk in Lévy Libor Modeling: Rating Based Approach Zorana Grbac Department of Math. Stochastics, University of Freiburg Joint work with Ernst Eberlein Croatian Quants Day University of Zagreb, 9th
More informationInsider information and arbitrage profits via enlargements of filtrations
Insider information and arbitrage profits via enlargements of filtrations Claudio Fontana Laboratoire de Probabilités et Modèles Aléatoires Université Paris Diderot XVI Workshop on Quantitative Finance
More informationRobust Portfolio Choice and Indifference Valuation
and Indifference Valuation Mitja Stadje Dep. of Econometrics & Operations Research Tilburg University joint work with Roger Laeven July, 2012 http://alexandria.tue.nl/repository/books/733411.pdf Setting
More informationPricing in markets modeled by general processes with independent increments
Pricing in markets modeled by general processes with independent increments Tom Hurd Financial Mathematics at McMaster www.phimac.org Thanks to Tahir Choulli and Shui Feng Financial Mathematics Seminar
More informationStructural Models of Credit Risk and Some Applications
Structural Models of Credit Risk and Some Applications Albert Cohen Actuarial Science Program Department of Mathematics Department of Statistics and Probability albert@math.msu.edu August 29, 2018 Outline
More informationArbitrage of the first kind and filtration enlargements in semimartingale financial models. Beatrice Acciaio
Arbitrage of the first kind and filtration enlargements in semimartingale financial models Beatrice Acciaio the London School of Economics and Political Science (based on a joint work with C. Fontana and
More informationOptimal Investment for Worst-Case Crash Scenarios
Optimal Investment for Worst-Case Crash Scenarios A Martingale Approach Frank Thomas Seifried Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern June 23, 2010 (Bachelier 2010) Worst-Case Portfolio
More informationStochastic Partial Differential Equations and Portfolio Choice. Crete, May Thaleia Zariphopoulou
Stochastic Partial Differential Equations and Portfolio Choice Crete, May 2011 Thaleia Zariphopoulou Oxford-Man Institute and Mathematical Institute University of Oxford and Mathematics and IROM, The University
More informationContagion models with interacting default intensity processes
Contagion models with interacting default intensity processes Yue Kuen KWOK Hong Kong University of Science and Technology This is a joint work with Kwai Sun Leung. 1 Empirical facts Default of one firm
More informationA model for a large investor trading at market indifference prices
A model for a large investor trading at market indifference prices Dmitry Kramkov (joint work with Peter Bank) Carnegie Mellon University and University of Oxford 5th Oxford-Princeton Workshop on Financial
More informationM5MF6. Advanced Methods in Derivatives Pricing
Course: Setter: M5MF6 Dr Antoine Jacquier MSc EXAMINATIONS IN MATHEMATICS AND FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS April 2016 M5MF6 Advanced Methods in Derivatives Pricing Setter s signature...........................................
More informationIndifference fee rate 1
Indifference fee rate 1 for variable annuities Ricardo ROMO ROMERO Etienne CHEVALIER and Thomas LIM Université d Évry Val d Essonne, Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Modélisation d Evry Second Young researchers
More informationOptional semimartingale decomposition and no arbitrage condition in enlarged ltration
Optional semimartingale decomposition and no arbitrage condition in enlarged ltration Anna Aksamit Laboratoire d'analyse & Probabilités, Université d'evry Onzième Colloque Jeunes Probabilistes et Statisticiens
More informationGirsanov s Theorem. Bernardo D Auria web: July 5, 2017 ICMAT / UC3M
Girsanov s Theorem Bernardo D Auria email: bernardo.dauria@uc3m.es web: www.est.uc3m.es/bdauria July 5, 2017 ICMAT / UC3M Girsanov s Theorem Decomposition of P-Martingales as Q-semi-martingales Theorem
More informationCredit Risk with asymmetric information on the default threshold
Credit Risk with asymmetric information on the default threshold Caroline HILLAIRET Ying JIAO International Conference on Stochastic Analysis and Applications, Hammamet - October 2-7, 2009 Abstract We
More informationOptimal trading strategies under arbitrage
Optimal trading strategies under arbitrage Johannes Ruf Columbia University, Department of Statistics The Third Western Conference in Mathematical Finance November 14, 2009 How should an investor trade
More informationHedging under Arbitrage
Hedging under Arbitrage Johannes Ruf Columbia University, Department of Statistics Modeling and Managing Financial Risks January 12, 2011 Motivation Given: a frictionless market of stocks with continuous
More informationBasic Concepts and Examples in Finance
Basic Concepts and Examples in Finance Bernardo D Auria email: bernardo.dauria@uc3m.es web: www.est.uc3m.es/bdauria July 5, 2017 ICMAT / UC3M The Financial Market The Financial Market We assume there are
More informationDOI: /s Springer. This version available at:
Umut Çetin and Luciano Campi Insider trading in an equilibrium model with default: a passage from reduced-form to structural modelling Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Campi, Luciano
More informationOptimal Investment with Deferred Capital Gains Taxes
Optimal Investment with Deferred Capital Gains Taxes A Simple Martingale Method Approach Frank Thomas Seifried University of Kaiserslautern March 20, 2009 F. Seifried (Kaiserslautern) Deferred Capital
More informationBACHELIER FINANCE SOCIETY. 4 th World Congress Tokyo, Investments and forward utilities. Thaleia Zariphopoulou The University of Texas at Austin
BACHELIER FINANCE SOCIETY 4 th World Congress Tokyo, 26 Investments and forward utilities Thaleia Zariphopoulou The University of Texas at Austin 1 Topics Utility-based measurement of performance Utilities
More informationStochastic modelling of electricity markets Pricing Forwards and Swaps
Stochastic modelling of electricity markets Pricing Forwards and Swaps Jhonny Gonzalez School of Mathematics The University of Manchester Magical books project August 23, 2012 Clip for this slide Pricing
More informationMartingale invariance and utility maximization
Martingale invariance and utility maximization Thorsten Rheinlander Jena, June 21 Thorsten Rheinlander () Martingale invariance Jena, June 21 1 / 27 Martingale invariance property Consider two ltrations
More informationOptimal stopping problems for a Brownian motion with a disorder on a finite interval
Optimal stopping problems for a Brownian motion with a disorder on a finite interval A. N. Shiryaev M. V. Zhitlukhin arxiv:1212.379v1 [math.st] 15 Dec 212 December 18, 212 Abstract We consider optimal
More informationPortability, salary and asset price risk: a continuous-time expected utility comparison of DB and DC pension plans
Portability, salary and asset price risk: a continuous-time expected utility comparison of DB and DC pension plans An Chen University of Ulm joint with Filip Uzelac (University of Bonn) Seminar at SWUFE,
More informationCredit Risk Models with Filtered Market Information
Credit Risk Models with Filtered Market Information Rüdiger Frey Universität Leipzig Bressanone, July 2007 ruediger.frey@math.uni-leipzig.de www.math.uni-leipzig.de/~frey joint with Abdel Gabih and Thorsten
More informationHedging of Defaultable Contingent Claims using BSDE with uncertain time horizon.
Hedging of Defaultable Contingent Claims using BSDE with uncertain time horizon. Christophette Blanchet-Scalliet, Anne Eyraud-Loisel, Manuela Royer-Carenzi To cite this version: Christophette Blanchet-Scalliet,
More informationReplication under Price Impact and Martingale Representation Property
Replication under Price Impact and Martingale Representation Property Dmitry Kramkov joint work with Sergio Pulido (Évry, Paris) Carnegie Mellon University Workshop on Equilibrium Theory, Carnegie Mellon,
More informationValuation of derivative assets Lecture 8
Valuation of derivative assets Lecture 8 Magnus Wiktorsson September 27, 2018 Magnus Wiktorsson L8 September 27, 2018 1 / 14 The risk neutral valuation formula Let X be contingent claim with maturity T.
More informationUtility indifference valuation for non-smooth payoffs on a market with some non tradable assets
Utility indifference valuation for non-smooth payoffs on a market with some non tradable assets - Joint work with G. Benedetti (Paris-Dauphine, CREST) - Luciano Campi Université Paris 13, FiME and CREST
More informationDynamic hedging of synthetic CDO tranches
ISFA, Université Lyon 1 Young Researchers Workshop on Finance 2011 TMU Finance Group Tokyo, March 2011 Introduction In this presentation, we address the hedging issue of CDO tranches in a market model
More informationRMSC 4005 Stochastic Calculus for Finance and Risk. 1 Exercises. (c) Let X = {X n } n=0 be a {F n }-supermartingale. Show that.
1. EXERCISES RMSC 45 Stochastic Calculus for Finance and Risk Exercises 1 Exercises 1. (a) Let X = {X n } n= be a {F n }-martingale. Show that E(X n ) = E(X ) n N (b) Let X = {X n } n= be a {F n }-submartingale.
More informationHedging with Life and General Insurance Products
Hedging with Life and General Insurance Products June 2016 2 Hedging with Life and General Insurance Products Jungmin Choi Department of Mathematics East Carolina University Abstract In this study, a hybrid
More informationRisk Neutral Measures
CHPTER 4 Risk Neutral Measures Our aim in this section is to show how risk neutral measures can be used to price derivative securities. The key advantage is that under a risk neutral measure the discounted
More informationBSDE with random terminal time under enlarged filtration and financial applications
BSDE with random terminal time under enlarged filtration and financial applications - Anne EYRAUD-LOISEL Université Lyon 1, Laboratoire SAF - Manuela ROYER Université Lyon 1, LBBE, CNRS, UMR 5558 26.5
More informationMESURES DE RISQUE DYNAMIQUES DYNAMIC RISK MEASURES
from BMO martingales MESURES DE RISQUE DYNAMIQUES DYNAMIC RISK MEASURES CNRS - CMAP Ecole Polytechnique March 1, 2007 1/ 45 OUTLINE from BMO martingales 1 INTRODUCTION 2 DYNAMIC RISK MEASURES Time Consistency
More informationAMH4 - ADVANCED OPTION PRICING. Contents
AMH4 - ADVANCED OPTION PRICING ANDREW TULLOCH Contents 1. Theory of Option Pricing 2 2. Black-Scholes PDE Method 4 3. Martingale method 4 4. Monte Carlo methods 5 4.1. Method of antithetic variances 5
More informationTheoretical Problems in Credit Portfolio Modeling 2
Theoretical Problems in Credit Portfolio Modeling 2 David X. Li Shanghai Advanced Institute of Finance (SAIF) Shanghai Jiaotong University(SJTU) November 3, 2017 Presented at the University of South California
More informationMSc Financial Engineering CHRISTMAS ASSIGNMENT: MERTON S JUMP-DIFFUSION MODEL. To be handed in by monday January 28, 2013
MSc Financial Engineering 2012-13 CHRISTMAS ASSIGNMENT: MERTON S JUMP-DIFFUSION MODEL To be handed in by monday January 28, 2013 Department EMS, Birkbeck Introduction The assignment consists of Reading
More informationThe Self-financing Condition: Remembering the Limit Order Book
The Self-financing Condition: Remembering the Limit Order Book R. Carmona, K. Webster Bendheim Center for Finance ORFE, Princeton University November 6, 2013 Structural relationships? From LOB Models to
More informationInterest rate models in continuous time
slides for the course Interest rate theory, University of Ljubljana, 2012-13/I, part IV József Gáll University of Debrecen Nov. 2012 Jan. 2013, Ljubljana Continuous time markets General assumptions, notations
More informationOption pricing in the stochastic volatility model of Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard
Option pricing in the stochastic volatility model of Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard Indifference pricing and the minimal entropy martingale measure Fred Espen Benth Centre of Mathematics for Applications
More information6: MULTI-PERIOD MARKET MODELS
6: MULTI-PERIOD MARKET MODELS Marek Rutkowski School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Semester 2, 2016 M. Rutkowski (USydney) 6: Multi-Period Market Models 1 / 55 Outline We will examine
More informationModeling Credit Risk with Partial Information
Modeling Credit Risk with Partial Information Umut Çetin Robert Jarrow Philip Protter Yıldıray Yıldırım June 5, Abstract This paper provides an alternative approach to Duffie and Lando 7] for obtaining
More informationParameters Estimation in Stochastic Process Model
Parameters Estimation in Stochastic Process Model A Quasi-Likelihood Approach Ziliang Li University of Maryland, College Park GEE RIT, Spring 28 Outline 1 Model Review The Big Model in Mind: Signal + Noise
More informationForward Dynamic Utility
Forward Dynamic Utility El Karoui Nicole & M RAD Mohamed UnivParis VI / École Polytechnique,CMAP elkaroui@cmapx.polytechnique.fr with the financial support of the "Fondation du Risque" and the Fédération
More informationTangent Lévy Models. Sergey Nadtochiy (joint work with René Carmona) Oxford-Man Institute of Quantitative Finance University of Oxford.
Tangent Lévy Models Sergey Nadtochiy (joint work with René Carmona) Oxford-Man Institute of Quantitative Finance University of Oxford June 24, 2010 6th World Congress of the Bachelier Finance Society Sergey
More informationAll Investors are Risk-averse Expected Utility Maximizers. Carole Bernard (UW), Jit Seng Chen (GGY) and Steven Vanduffel (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)
All Investors are Risk-averse Expected Utility Maximizers Carole Bernard (UW), Jit Seng Chen (GGY) and Steven Vanduffel (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) First Name: Waterloo, April 2013. Last Name: UW ID #:
More informationUtility Indifference Pricing and Dynamic Programming Algorithm
Chapter 8 Utility Indifference ricing and Dynamic rogramming Algorithm In the Black-Scholes framework, we can perfectly replicate an option s payoff. However, it may not be true beyond the Black-Scholes
More informationinduced by the Solvency II project
Asset Les normes allocation IFRS : new en constraints assurance induced by the Solvency II project 36 th International ASTIN Colloquium Zürich September 005 Frédéric PLANCHET Pierre THÉROND ISFA Université
More informationLecture 4. Finite difference and finite element methods
Finite difference and finite element methods Lecture 4 Outline Black-Scholes equation From expectation to PDE Goal: compute the value of European option with payoff g which is the conditional expectation
More informationSupply Contracts with Financial Hedging
Supply Contracts with Financial Hedging René Caldentey Martin Haugh Stern School of Business NYU Integrated Risk Management in Operations and Global Supply Chain Management: Risk, Contracts and Insurance
More informationControl Improvement for Jump-Diffusion Processes with Applications to Finance
Control Improvement for Jump-Diffusion Processes with Applications to Finance Nicole Bäuerle joint work with Ulrich Rieder Toronto, June 2010 Outline Motivation: MDPs Controlled Jump-Diffusion Processes
More informationOptimal investments under dynamic performance critria. Lecture IV
Optimal investments under dynamic performance critria Lecture IV 1 Utility-based measurement of performance 2 Deterministic environment Utility traits u(x, t) : x wealth and t time Monotonicity u x (x,
More informationMATH3075/3975 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS
MATH307/37 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS School of Mathematics and Statistics Semester, 04 Tutorial problems should be used to test your mathematical skills and understanding of the lecture material.
More informationMean-variance hedging when there are jumps
Mean-variance hedging when there are jumps Andrew E.B. Lim Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research University of California Berkeley, CA 9472 Email: lim@ieor.berkeley.edu March 22,
More informationAll Investors are Risk-averse Expected Utility Maximizers
All Investors are Risk-averse Expected Utility Maximizers Carole Bernard (UW), Jit Seng Chen (GGY) and Steven Vanduffel (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) AFFI, Lyon, May 2013. Carole Bernard All Investors are
More informationTime Consistent Utility Maximization 1
Time Consistent Utility Maximization 1 Traian A. Pirvu Dept of Mathematics & Statistics McMaster University 128 Main Street West Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1 tpirvu@math.mcmaster.ca Ulrich G. Haussmann Dept of
More informationAre the Azéma-Yor processes truly remarkable?
Are the Azéma-Yor processes truly remarkable? Jan Obłój j.obloj@imperial.ac.uk based on joint works with L. Carraro, N. El Karoui, A. Meziou and M. Yor Swiss Probability Seminar, 5 Dec 2007 Are the Azéma-Yor
More informationDYNAMIC CDO TERM STRUCTURE MODELLING
DYNAMIC CDO TERM STRUCTURE MODELLING Damir Filipović (joint with Ludger Overbeck and Thorsten Schmidt) Vienna Institute of Finance www.vif.ac.at PRisMa 2008 Workshop on Portfolio Risk Management TU Vienna,
More informationDecomposition of life insurance liabilities into risk factors theory and application to annuity conversion options
Decomposition of life insurance liabilities into risk factors theory and application to annuity conversion options Joint work with Daniel Bauer, Marcus C. Christiansen, Alexander Kling Katja Schilling
More informationPricing and hedging in the presence of extraneous risks
Stochastic Processes and their Applications 117 (2007) 742 765 www.elsevier.com/locate/spa Pricing and hedging in the presence of extraneous risks Pierre Collin Dufresne a, Julien Hugonnier b, a Haas School
More informationLecture 3: Review of mathematical finance and derivative pricing models
Lecture 3: Review of mathematical finance and derivative pricing models Xiaoguang Wang STAT 598W January 21th, 2014 (STAT 598W) Lecture 3 1 / 51 Outline 1 Some model independent definitions and principals
More informationEnlargement of filtration
Enlargement of filtration Bernardo D Auria email: bernardo.dauria@uc3m.es web: www.est.uc3m.es/bdauria July 6, 2017 ICMAT / UC3M Enlargement of Filtration Enlargement of Filtration ([1] 5.9) If G is a
More informationToward a coherent Monte Carlo simulation of CVA
Toward a coherent Monte Carlo simulation of CVA Lokman Abbas-Turki (Joint work with A. I. Bouselmi & M. A. Mikou) TU Berlin January 9, 2013 Lokman (TU Berlin) Advances in Mathematical Finance 1 / 16 Plan
More informationθ(t ) = T f(0, T ) + σ2 T
1 Derivatives Pricing and Financial Modelling Andrew Cairns: room M3.08 E-mail: A.Cairns@ma.hw.ac.uk Tutorial 10 1. (Ho-Lee) Let X(T ) = T 0 W t dt. (a) What is the distribution of X(T )? (b) Find E[exp(
More informationLECTURE 4: BID AND ASK HEDGING
LECTURE 4: BID AND ASK HEDGING 1. Introduction One of the consequences of incompleteness is that the price of derivatives is no longer unique. Various strategies for dealing with this exist, but a useful
More informationEconomathematics. Problem Sheet 1. Zbigniew Palmowski. Ws 2 dw s = 1 t
Economathematics Problem Sheet 1 Zbigniew Palmowski 1. Calculate Ee X where X is a gaussian random variable with mean µ and volatility σ >.. Verify that where W is a Wiener process. Ws dw s = 1 3 W t 3
More informationAN ANALYTICALLY TRACTABLE UNCERTAIN VOLATILITY MODEL
AN ANALYTICALLY TRACTABLE UNCERTAIN VOLATILITY MODEL FABIO MERCURIO BANCA IMI, MILAN http://www.fabiomercurio.it 1 Stylized facts Traders use the Black-Scholes formula to price plain-vanilla options. An
More informationHedging of swaptions in a Lévy driven Heath-Jarrow-Morton framework
Hedging of swaptions in a Lévy driven Heath-Jarrow-Morton framework Kathrin Glau, Nele Vandaele, Michèle Vanmaele Bachelier Finance Society World Congress 2010 June 22-26, 2010 Nele Vandaele Hedging of
More informationAre the Azéma-Yor processes truly remarkable?
Are the Azéma-Yor processes truly remarkable? Jan Obłój j.obloj@imperial.ac.uk based on joint works with L. Carraro, N. El Karoui, A. Meziou and M. Yor Welsh Probability Seminar, 17 Jan 28 Are the Azéma-Yor
More informationAsset Pricing Models with Underlying Time-varying Lévy Processes
Asset Pricing Models with Underlying Time-varying Lévy Processes Stochastics & Computational Finance 2015 Xuecan CUI Jang SCHILTZ University of Luxembourg July 9, 2015 Xuecan CUI, Jang SCHILTZ University
More informationDynamic Protection for Bayesian Optimal Portfolio
Dynamic Protection for Bayesian Optimal Portfolio Hideaki Miyata Department of Mathematics, Kyoto University Jun Sekine Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University Jan. 6, 2009, Kunitachi, Tokyo 1
More informationFrom Discrete Time to Continuous Time Modeling
From Discrete Time to Continuous Time Modeling Prof. S. Jaimungal, Department of Statistics, University of Toronto 2004 Arrow-Debreu Securities 2004 Prof. S. Jaimungal 2 Consider a simple one-period economy
More informationPortfolio Optimization Under Fixed Transaction Costs
Portfolio Optimization Under Fixed Transaction Costs Gennady Shaikhet supervised by Dr. Gady Zohar The model Market with two securities: b(t) - bond without interest rate p(t) - stock, an Ito process db(t)
More informationHedging under arbitrage
Hedging under arbitrage Johannes Ruf Columbia University, Department of Statistics AnStAp10 August 12, 2010 Motivation Usually, there are several trading strategies at one s disposal to obtain a given
More information1.1 Basic Financial Derivatives: Forward Contracts and Options
Chapter 1 Preliminaries 1.1 Basic Financial Derivatives: Forward Contracts and Options A derivative is a financial instrument whose value depends on the values of other, more basic underlying variables
More informationMASM006 UNIVERSITY OF EXETER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS.
MASM006 UNIVERSITY OF EXETER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS May/June 2006 Time allowed: 2 HOURS. Examiner: Dr N.P. Byott This is a CLOSED
More informationKim Weston (Carnegie Mellon University) Market Stability and Indifference Prices. 1st Eastern Conference on Mathematical Finance.
1st Eastern Conference on Mathematical Finance March 216 Based on Stability of Utility Maximization in Nonequivalent Markets, Finance & Stochastics (216) Basic Problem Consider a financial market consisting
More informationIEOR E4703: Monte-Carlo Simulation
IEOR E4703: Monte-Carlo Simulation Simulating Stochastic Differential Equations Martin Haugh Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research Columbia University Email: martin.b.haugh@gmail.com
More informationInsider trading, stochastic liquidity, and equilibrium prices
Insider trading, stochastic liquidity, and equilibrium prices Pierre Collin-Dufresne EPFL, Columbia University and NBER Vyacheslav (Slava) Fos University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign April 24, 2013
More informationNo arbitrage conditions in HJM multiple curve term structure models
No arbitrage conditions in HJM multiple curve term structure models Zorana Grbac LPMA, Université Paris Diderot Joint work with W. Runggaldier 7th General AMaMeF and Swissquote Conference Lausanne, 7-10
More informationThe Birth of Financial Bubbles
The Birth of Financial Bubbles Philip Protter, Cornell University Finance and Related Mathematical Statistics Issues Kyoto Based on work with R. Jarrow and K. Shimbo September 3-6, 2008 Famous bubbles
More informationHedging Basket Credit Derivatives with CDS
Hedging Basket Credit Derivatives with CDS Wolfgang M. Schmidt HfB - Business School of Finance & Management Center of Practical Quantitative Finance schmidt@hfb.de Frankfurt MathFinance Workshop, April
More informationAn Explicit Example of a Shadow Price Process with Stochastic Investment Opportunity Set
An Explicit Example of a Shadow Price Process with Stochastic Investment Opportunity Set Christoph Czichowsky Faculty of Mathematics University of Vienna SIAM FM 12 New Developments in Optimal Portfolio
More informationMartingale Pricing Theory in Discrete-Time and Discrete-Space Models
IEOR E4707: Foundations of Financial Engineering c 206 by Martin Haugh Martingale Pricing Theory in Discrete-Time and Discrete-Space Models These notes develop the theory of martingale pricing in a discrete-time,
More informationKØBENHAVNS UNIVERSITET (Blok 2, 2011/2012) Naturvidenskabelig kandidateksamen Continuous time finance (FinKont) TIME ALLOWED : 3 hours
This question paper consists of 3 printed pages FinKont KØBENHAVNS UNIVERSITET (Blok 2, 211/212) Naturvidenskabelig kandidateksamen Continuous time finance (FinKont) TIME ALLOWED : 3 hours This exam paper
More informationProspect Theory: A New Paradigm for Portfolio Choice
Prospect Theory: A New Paradigm for Portfolio Choice 1 Prospect Theory Expected Utility Theory and Its Paradoxes Prospect Theory 2 Portfolio Selection Model and Solution Continuous-Time Market Setting
More informationStochastic Differential equations as applied to pricing of options
Stochastic Differential equations as applied to pricing of options By Yasin LUT Supevisor:Prof. Tuomo Kauranne December 2010 Introduction Pricing an European call option Conclusion INTRODUCTION A stochastic
More information4 Risk-neutral pricing
4 Risk-neutral pricing We start by discussing the idea of risk-neutral pricing in the framework of the elementary one-stepbinomialmodel. Supposetherearetwotimest = andt = 1. Attimethestock has value S()
More informationApplication of Stochastic Calculus to Price a Quanto Spread
Application of Stochastic Calculus to Price a Quanto Spread Christopher Ting http://www.mysmu.edu/faculty/christophert/ Algorithmic Quantitative Finance July 15, 2017 Christopher Ting July 15, 2017 1/33
More information