EvCC Emergency Management Plan ANNEX #11 Hazard Assessment

Similar documents
Hazard Vulnerability Assessment for Long Term Care Facilities

FACILITY NAME. CONSIDERATIONS FOR COMPLETING THE ANALYSIS FORMS The following instructions were modified from the Kaiser Permanente HVA tool

Assessing Risk: Shifting Focus from Hazards to Capabilities. Jane Coolidge Kara Walker CMRHCC April 2017

PHASE 2 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT

GUIDE BUSINESS & INDUSTRY A STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH TO EMERGENCY PLANNING, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY FOR COMPANIES OF ALL SIZES

Section II: Vulnerability Assessment and Mitigation

Southwest Florida Healthcare Coalition

Prerequisites for EOP Creation: Hazard Identification and Assessment

The Mississippi State Department of Health EOPs and HVAs Presented By: Lillie Bailey

BY Sri D. K. Goswami OIL INDIA LIMITED

Garfield County NHMP:

GUIDELINE ACTIVITY RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE

Risk Check: Applying Community Risk Reduction Strategies To Enforcement Inspections

Evaluate every potential event in each of the three categories of probability, risk, and preparedness. Add additional events as necessary.

IBTTA Facilities Management and Maintenance Workshop October 23-25, 2011 Nashville, TN Ray Szczucki ACE USA Inland Marine ACE USA

SECURITY MANAGEMENT Manage critical incidents as a security practitioner

Executive Summary. Introduction and Purpose. Scope

Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for Financial Institutions. Start

Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for Real Estate. Start

Introduction to Disaster Management

Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for Retail. Start

Emergency Resilience Risk Assessment

Enterprise England is a small charity, currently with no staff and relying upon outsourced consultants.

AFTERMATH OUTBREAK. Contingency Planning to Sustain Critical Operations During Large Scale Disasters and Catastrophic Events

GUIDELINE ACTIVITY RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE. Purpose

Multi-Hazard Risk Management Project The Smithsonian Institution (SI)

DRAFT Revised Guide to the National CDEM Plan 2015 July 2015

2. Hazards and risks. 2 HAZARDS AND RISKS p1

Northeast Florida Healthcare Coalition Multi-Year Strategic Plan ( )

Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for Construction. Start

RISK AND BUSINESS CONTINUITY MANAGEMENT

WHS Risk Assessment and Control Form

SURVIVE. Ready NOW! Business Continuity Planning

19 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters

1 Rare Hazard event is not likely to occur within 100 years. 2 Occasional Hazard event is likely to occur within 100 years

Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for Energy. Chemical. Start

COMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF LISBON

Sussex County All Hazard Mitigation Plan. Plan Executive Summary

COMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF CENTRAL CITY

Natural Hazards Risks in Kentucky. KAMM Regional Training

Hazard Mitigation Planning

Risk management procedures

Q1 Do you...(check all that apply).

A Multihazard Approach to Building Safety: Using FEMA Publication 452 as a Mitigation Tool

7.0 RISK MANAGEMENT. Table of Contents

P art B 4 NATURAL HAZARDS. Natural Hazards ISSUE 1. River Flooding

Emergency Preparedness. Emergency Preparedness & the Senior Housing Provider. The Speakers LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

Catastrophe Risk Engineering Solutions

Best Practices for Transforming Physical Environment Compliance

Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Control Procedure

THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. BELL ENDORSEMENT

Risk Assessment Planning Team Meeting April 5, 2016

Appendix L Methodology for risk assessment

Disaster resilient communities: Canada s insurers promote adaptation to the growing threat of high impact weather

Qualitative versus Quantitative Analysis. two types of assessments Qualitative and Quantitative.

Emergency Preparedness

Property business interruption Policy wording

Disasters and Localities. Dr. Tonya T. Neaves Director Centers on the Public Service Schar School of Policy and Government

A Practical Framework for Assessing Emerging Risks

DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING. To print to A4, print at 75%.

Methodology Overview. Dr. Andrew Coburn. Director of Advisory Board of Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies and Senior Vice President of RMS Inc.

PART 1 2 HAZARDS, RISKS & SAFETY.

Design Challenges and Solutions

2. Hazards and risks 2. HAZARDS AND RISKS. Summary

Controlling Risk Ranking Variability Using a Progressive Risk Registry

Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for Energy. Oil, Gas and Petrochemical. Start

Strategic Security Management: Risk Assessments in the Environment of Care. Karim H. Vellani, CPP, CSC

MODEL VULNERABILITY Author: Mohammad Zolfaghari CatRisk Solutions

Mitigation Strategies

Property business interruption (technology) Policy wording

The Global Risk Landscape. RMS models quantify the impacts of natural and human-made catastrophes for the global insurance and reinsurance industry.

A Framework for Risk Assessment of Infrastructure in a Multi-Hazard Environment. Stephanie King, PhD, PE

FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY ADVERSE WEATHER AND EMERGENCY EVENTS

Introduction. Aim. Respond to a disruptive incident (Incident Management Phase)

Future Pathways. Fresh perspectives from actuaries of the future. Auckland, 9 March 2012 Wellington, 12 March 2012

GOV : Enterprise Risk Management Policy

STATE AND LOCAL MITIGATION PLANNING how-to guide

An Introductory Presentation for ECU Staff

Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for the Healthcare sector. Start

ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT (ERM) The Conceptual Framework

Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan 5-Year Update Progress Report Chippewa County Taskforce Committee January 29, 2013

REGIONAL HAZARD VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS REPORT

Disaster in SDGs. - How can we measure? Youngmi Lee (Statistical Research Institute) Honggyu Sohn (Yonsei Univ.)

4.1 Risk Assessment and Treatment Assessing Security Risks

HAZARD DESCRIPTION... 1 LOCATION... 2 EXTENT... 4 HISTORICAL OCCURRENCES... 6 PROBABILITY OF FUTURE EVENTS... 6 VULNERABILITY AND IMPACT...

Managing the Impact of Weather & Natural Hazards. Council Best Practice natural hazard preparedness

NOT ALL DISASTERS ARE MADE BY MOTHER NATURE

Risk Considerations in Asset Management Decisions

HAZUS th Annual Conference

7/25/2013. Presented by: Erike Young, MPPA, CSP, ARM. Chapter 2. Root Cause Analysis

Handout 1.1 Essential Records

Business Case for Using a Numbered Logarithmic Risk Severity Scale. Don Swallom U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command Redstone Arsenal, Alabama

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

Security Risk Management

Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for the Manufacturing sector. Start

A Real All-Hazards Risk Assessment Approach. Agenda

WHOLESALE RISK INSIGHT FOCUSSING ON RISK ISSUES IN WHOLESALE, WAREHOUSING AND DISTRIBUTION. WHOLESALE Risk Insight

REDUCING DISASTER RISK a challenge for development

REGULATORY REPORT CARD May 2015

Terrorism, Zika, CBI - Business Operations Impacted Without Physical Damage? Now What?

Transcription:

1. INTRODUCTION The risk and vulnerability assessment process detailed here identifies the hazards the Evict Campus faces and assesses the level of vulnerability to these potential events. Conducting a risk assessment will allow the EvCC campus to determine Which natural, manmade, and technological hazards could affect the campus What areas of the campus are vulnerable to the hazards What assets will be affected To what degree these assets will be affected This crucial examination of the impact of the risks and hazards identified will serve as the foundation for the EvCC future emergency plans. 2. RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL A. The risk Assessment model is designed to quantify and document the probability and overall severity of various types of threat events or hazards (natural, technological, and terrorism). B. For each threat event, the probability and impact estimates are combined (probability x impact) to quantify the relative risk of each threat event. C. The relative risk provides a basis to identify and evaluate existing mitigation and recovery efforts to determine if there are significant campus vulnerabilities. D. For each threat event, the EvCC Emergency Manager will determine the probability of occurrence. E. Campus participants will then evaluate six impact questions across three different categories (human impact, facilities impact, and institutional impact). All six estimates for impact are averaged to produce an overall severity score. F. The overall severity score and the probability are then combined to create a relative risk score for each threat event. 10/01/2012 CEMP ANNEX #011 Page 1 of 6

G. Once all the threat events have been evaluated the results are sorted from high too low to produce a relative risk ranking of threat exposures. H. The results will then be discussed with a representative group to determine reasonableness and validity. I. The results of this risk assessment should provide a basis to evaluate adequacy of campus mitigation measures and recovery planning for the most significant campus threats. 3. HAZARD / EVENT DESCRIPTIONS This section lists specific hazards and provides a brief description of each. Unless otherwise specified all events occur during the middle of a typical academic instruction weekday while classes are in session and all staff are present. A. Natural Hazards / Events 1. Flood Flooding on the EvCC campus can be the result of a natural event or manmade event such as the rupture of a main water distribution line. 2. Landslide/mudslide Localized land/mudslide can occur on unstable hillside during severe rainstorm event. Consider campus vulnerability based on facilities located on or near potentially unstable hillsides. 3. High Winds High winds may topple large trees on the central campus, cause damage to structures and power lines adjacent to the trees. 4. Wildfire Wild land fires may start upwind of some campus facilities during high fire danger conditions during peak fire season. Consider campus layout (number of vulnerable campus facilities adjacent to wild land areas), local topography, and adjacent wild land vegetation fuel loading. 10/01/2012 CEMP ANNEX #011 Page 2 of 6

5. Catastrophic Earthquake Maximum credible earthquake ( the big one ) occurs on a nearby fault. Assume there is structural collapse of some buildings and significant structural and non-structural damage to other campus buildings. Consider vulnerability of campus buildings (based on extent of structural and nonstructural mitigation). Casualties are commensurate with size and scope of predicted earthquake. 6. Tsunami Coastal Consider campus layout and locally predicted maximum event. B. Technological Hazards 1. Power Failure Widespread campus power failure for minimum of 12 hours. Consider vulnerability of campus electrical distribution system. Damages and overall impacts commensurate with past campus power outages. 2. Water Supply Disruption 3. Telecommunications System Failure 4. Information Technology Infrastructure Disruption Widespread campus water supply disruption for minimum of 12 hours. Consider vulnerability of campus water distribution system. Damages and overall impacts commensurate with past major water main breaks or other disruption of campus water supply. Widespread campus voice communications systems failure for minimum of 12 hours. Consider vulnerability of campus telecommunications systems. Impacts commensurate with past campus telecommunications failures. Centrally managed campus IT systems (network mainframe/servers) disrupted for minimum of 12 hours due to hacking activity or technical malfunction. Consider vulnerability of central campus IT systems. Damages and overall impacts commensurate with similar past campus IT failures. 5. Residential Building Fire Consider vulnerability of campus associated residential buildings (sprinkler protection, building age and construction, etc.). 10/01/2012 CEMP ANNEX #011 Page 3 of 6

6. Central Administration Building Fire 7. Accidental Hazmat Release Main campus administration building heavily damaged by fire. Alternatively, major fire in a lab building hazardous materials complicate response and fire suppression (choose the scenario that has greatest campus-wide impact). Airborne toxic gas plume spreads out of a laboratory into other areas of a major lab building, and then escapes into the outside air. B. Human Related Events 1. Public Health Emergency 2. Sports/Public Event Disturbance An outbreak of a highly contagious disease occurs in the campus community, resulting in significant widespread illness (greater than a typical flu outbreak). A significant disturbance occurs following a scheduled campus public event. Impacts commensurate with past campus experiences. 3. Workplace Violence Violence against an employee by another employee, student or the general public. May also be the result of a domestic violence incident. 4. Bomb on campus Detonation of a bomb on campus. 5. Active Shooter A gunman on campus actively shooting or threatening to shoot students, faculty, or staff members. 6. Intentional Biological Agent Release An infectious agent is intentionally released inside a campus building, resulting in a limited number of illnesses. There are limited casualties but many worried well persons. There is no physical damage to facilities, although decontamination may be required. 4. Civil Disturbance A spontaneous riot breaks out and spreads onto the central campus. Impacts commensurate with past campus experiences. 10/01/2012 CEMP ANNEX #011 Page 4 of 6

TABLE: Probability & Severity Metrics 1. Probability Metric Consider the number of occurrences on the EvCC campus over the past 25 years, the number of similar events at other Universities, and any changes or trends that could affect the frequency of this event on EvCC. Estimate the likelihood this event will occur in next 25 years. 1. Not applicable (will not occur) 2. Doubtful (not likely) 3. Possible (could occur) 4. Probable (very likely to occur) 5. Inevitable (will occur) 2. Human Impact Question #1 Consider the number of occurrences on the EvCC campus over the past 25 years what were the extent of injuries and deaths that occurred? Evaluate the extent of injuries and deaths that occurred. 1. None, or this event has never occurred on campus 2. Few minor injuries 3. Multiple minor injuries or a major injury 4. Multiple major injuries or a death 5. Multiple deaths and major injuries 3. Human Impact - Question #3 Consider the potential for injuries or deaths from this event on EvCC or from similar events at other universities, and any changes or trends that would affect future injuries and deaths from this type of event. 4. Facilities Impact - Question #1 Consider the vulnerability of EvCC facilities to this event. Estimate the number of injuries and deaths that could result from this event. 1. None 2. Few minor injuries 3. Multiple minor injuries or possible major injury 4. Multiple major injuries or possible death 5. Multiple deaths and major injuries Estimate the extent of damage to central campus facilities. 1. Little or no damage 2. Mild damage to several facilities 3. Moderate damage to multiple facilities 4. Severe damage to multiple facilities 5. Extensive damage to most facilities 10/01/2012 CEMP ANNEX #011 Page 5 of 6

5. Facilities Impact - Question #2 Considering the extent of damage to the EvCC central campus facilities, estimate the total cost to respond to the event and repair or replace damaged facilities Estimate the cost to respond to the event and repair or replace all damaged facilities. 1. Less than $1 million 2. Between $1 million and $10 million 3. Between $10 million and $100 million 4. Between $100 million and $1 billion 5. More than $1 billion 6. Institutional Impact - Question #1 Consider the duration of interruption to campus-wide teaching, research activities, and business operations. Estimate the duration of interruption to campus-wide teaching and research activities and business operations. 1. Hours 2. Days 3. Weeks 4. Months 5. Year or longer 7. Institutional Impact - Question #2 Consider the extent that this event would negatively impact the EvCC campus reputation or public image over the long term. Evaluate the extent this event would negatively impact the campus reputation or public image over the long term? 1. None 2. Minor 3. Moderate 4. Significant 5. Severe 10/01/2012 CEMP ANNEX #011 Page 6 of 6