INTRODUCTION. Nearly one third of a million people call the 1,893 square miles of Clackamas County home.

Similar documents
Executive Summary 1/3/2018

CITY OF PALM DESERT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN

Georgetown Planning Department Plan Annual Update: Background

INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 1

Sketch Plan Alternatives: Summary of Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors Recommendations

Introduction P O L I C Y D O C U M E N T P A R T 1

Georgetown Planning Department Plan Annual Update: Background

City of Georgetown 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 4. - Plan Administration

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Plan Abstract

The foundation of the Elk Grove General Plan is the Vision Statement, contained in the Preface to this General Plan

Capital Improvements

REGIONAL EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PURPOSE 3.0 DEFINITIONS. Edmonton Metropolitan Region Planning Toolkit

This page intentionally blank. Capital Facilities Chapter Relationship to Vision. Capital Facilities Chapter Concepts

CHAPTER I DRAFT 9_26_13 INTRODUCTION TO THE 2030 PLAN

ACTION STRATEGIES. Aurora Places is the guidebook

Plan Implementation AICP Exam Review

Kelly Howsley Glover, Long Range Planner Wasco County Planning Commission. Wasco County Planning Department

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

Planning Commission Meeting. March 2, 2016

INTRODUCTION. Introduction Page 1 of 5. G:\Comp\Adopted Comprehensive Plans\15. Cylce 16-2 and 16-3\Elements not changed\_d. Introduction.

General Plan Goals. Vision. More Detail. More Detail. More Detail. More Detail

Chapter 1: Introduction

Introduction and Participation Horizon 2030 Comprehensive Plan (Prepared 2010)

Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. Recent amendments Beginning with Acts 67 & 68 of 2000 First Edition, January 2003

PLANNING DEPARTMENT. Town Goals. Goal: Ensure that infrastructure exists for current and future needs identified in the comprehensive plan.

EXHIBIT B FINDINGS OF FACT BEND DEVELOPMENT CODE (BDC) UPDATE AMENDMENT PZ

Planning Commission 101:

Paul Newman. County Manager CLARK COUNTY, WASHINGTON EXECUTIVE SEARCH PROVIDED BY STRATEGIC GOVERNMENT RESOURCES

Village of Blue Mounds Annex

Minimum Elements of a Local Comprehensive Plan

City of Manassas, Virginia Planning Commission Meeting AGENDA. Work Session

CITY OF WINCHESTER KENTUCKY/PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE

2020 Annual Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Regulatory Code. Monday, April 1, 2019, at 5:00 p.m.

Updated Planning Commission Work Program ( )

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT

AS THEIR SHELTON, WASHINGTON OUTSTANDING OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE THE CITIZENS OF. The Community

1. I N T R O D U C T I O N

Policy CIE The following are the minimum acceptable LOS standards to be utilized in planning for capital improvement needs:

Town of Tyrone Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Thursday June 22, :00 PM

Justification for Floodplain Regulatory Standards in Illinois

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

natural resources, and functional street system. Both are proposed to be updated through the periodic review process.

City of Lewiston, Maine Advertisement for Request for Proposals Comprehensive Plan Update RFP #: Due Date: October 9, 2012

7. Local Economy. photo: david garten D e c e m b e r Wa i t s f i e l d T o w n P l a n 6 7

2019 HUMBOLDT COUNTY REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT PLAN

PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION

LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ZONING DIVISION STAFF REPORT

Rapid City. Citizen Budget Priority Survey. February 2018

The City s Neighborhood Initiatives

Introduced by the Council President at the request of the Joint. Planning Committee & substituted by the Land Use and Zoning Committee:

6 MONTH PLANNING CALENDAR May November 2018

Proposed Planning Commission Work Program ( )

Truckloads (at 25 tons/truck) of building debris 90

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Consulting Engineering Services for: Troutdale Water Master Plan

Arvada, Colorado is a beautiful, first-ring

A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR SUSTAINABILITY AND GROWTH 2016/17

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL BY-LAW NUMBER

Strengthening Vermont s Economy by Integrating Transportation and Smart Growth Policy

HERCULES STRATEGIC PLAN 2017

ORDINANCE NO. CID-3193

Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Kankakee County, Illinois Executive Summary

Albemarle County FY17 19 Strategic Plan

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES

Orientation. Overview. Contents

County-wide Planning Policies

II. TAXATION. Value Added Tax We are opposed to a value added tax.

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL Read and Examined by Proofreaders:

West Linn s Waterfront Public Engagement Plan

City of Seattle COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

Multi-Jurisdictional. Multnomah County. Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. Public Comment DRAFT Nov. 7, 2016

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL. California state law requires that each city adopt a General Plan. The General Plan must include:

ORDINANCE NO

ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN WORK PLAN

Building Regulation for Resilience In Low and Middle-Income Countries

KETCHUM ESSENTIAL SERVICES FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Commercial Property Redevelopment Loan to 14 th & Everett Investors, LLC (Meier & Frank Warehouse Project)

AGENDA OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO. October 19, Proclamations and Presentations 5:30 p.m.

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2006 CMR: 346:06

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Volume I: Countywide General Plan

7 ITEM 8 10:20 A.M. January 12, 2006 STAFF REPORT

OHIO STATEWIDE TRANSIT NEEDS STUDY

Building and Developing Public Trust through the Budget

Planning Commission WORKSHOP: General Plan Implementation Program - Task 2 Refining the General Plan Implementation Checklist.

Overview of Presentation

Chapter 4: Plan Implementation

PLANNING MANAGER (80% FTE)

Report Card May 2015 T H I S P L A N I S A V A I L A B L E I N A L T E R N A T E F O R M A T B Y R E Q U E S T

Section 600. Facilities Development

FINAL DRAFT CONSISTENCY REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT

KITTITAS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO

Executive Summary: DEQ Non-Limited Budget

Updating LCP Implementation Plan (IP) Procedures

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: January 9, 2012

Item #6B. September 17, 2014

FINANCIAL POLICIES Originally Adopted by the City Council on September 15, 2014 Revised on May 2, 2016

Section II: Overview of the Annual Growth Policy 1. Background

O R E G O N T O U R I S M L I S T EN I N G S E S S I O N S U MMA R Y June 2018

3/1/2016. City Council City Hall Wilmington, North Carolina Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:

SOUTHERN BELTWAY US-22 TO I-79 PROJECT 2013 FINANCIAL PLAN. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Allegheny and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania

Transcription:

INTRODUCTION Nearly one third of a million people call the 1,893 square miles of Clackamas County home. The County's settlement pattern has resulted in small communities, most of which are clustered in the northwest part of the County. Most of the housing is attractive and structurally sound. Business and industry have established the reputation of being good neighbors. County residents value the clean water, the thriving fisheries of the rivers, the glistening year-round snow of Mt. Hood, and the verdant carpet of timber on mountain slopes. They also value the proximity of jobs, services, and the cultural advantages of Portland. This combination of an unspoiled natural environment, rich in contrasting beauty, and the pleasant cultural environment of local communities and neighboring Portland, has inspired County residents to turn their attention to what the future may bring. WHY PLAN? Planning is essentially an organized attempt at community foresight. It seeks to guide the future conservation and development of an area within a framework of goals and policies consistent with physical constraints, legal requirements and attitudes and resources of the community. The basic aim of the Comprehensive Plan is to organize and coordinate the complex interrelationships among people, land, resources, and facilities in such a way as to protect the future health, safety, quality of life and welfare of Clackamas County residents. GOALS The overall goals of the Plan are: Balance public and private interests and adopt a coordinated set of goals and policies to guide future development in Clackamas County. Identify the most appropriate land uses for individual sites by evaluating site characteristics in light of market demand, human needs, technology, and state, regional, and County goals. Provide for growth in areas where public facilities can economically be provided to support growth. Create development opportunities most compatible with the fiscal and financial capacity of the County and its residents. I-1

Implement the policies of this Plan by adopting a zoning map and set of regulations, and by guiding public investments to support anticipated growth. Establish a system whereby individual interests may be compared to stated County policy, and provide a process for review and amendment of those policies as expressed in this Comprehensive Plan. FOUNDATION IN THE PAST This Plan is the culmination of Clackamas County's comprehensive planning efforts. The first Plan was adopted in 1974, with major updates in 1980 and 1992. In addition, revisions to the plan text and maps have been made periodically in response to an opportunity, or a state, federal or regional requirement. All revisions to the plan have been developed through a process including public input in development of plan concepts, and public hearings on specific proposed plan language. Much of the Plan is carried over in each update. Revisions to the Plan are necessary because: 1. The Plan calls for regular review and revision. 2. Statewide Planning Goals, adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission in 1974, require periodic review. 3. The County's population, housing, natural resources, employment and traffic have changed since the first Plan was adopted, and are expected to continue to change over time. 4. New state laws, Administrative Rules (OARs), and court decisions regularly occur that further specify the relationship between planning and zoning, or establish new requirements or opportunities. This Plan considers, and includes as a part of this Plan, the Mt. Hood Community Plan adopted in 1982 by Order No. 76-1855 and all subsequent amendments to it. All parts of the Mt. Hood Plan are deemed consistent with this Plan. Procedures for amending the Mt. Hood Community Plan shall be governed by policies for amendments and procedures in Chapter 11 of this Plan. I-2

HOPE FOR THE FUTURE While continuity is one strength of comprehensive planning, the ability to adapt policy to changing needs and conditions is another. This plan builds on earlier Comprehensive Plans. It addresses concerns about energy and housing, for instance, which our society ignored previously. It attempts to resolve administrative problems encountered during the first years the Plan was used. With each update, the Comprehensive Plan is supported by better information and a more effective citizen involvement process. Consequently, this Plan can better guide development to the year 2020 than its predecessor, and it contains policies for future revision and amendment. HOW TO USE THIS PLAN This Plan, together with its supporting documents and the Court Orders by which it is adopted, is an official policy statement of the County. Goals and Policies in this Plan direct future decisions on land use actions, ordinance amendments, zone changes, capital expenditures, procedures, and programs. Plan Maps, in conjunction with the goals and policies, direct development and identify areas subject to various policies. Each chapter of the Plan consists of: Background Issues Summary of Findings and Conclusions Goals Policies The facts on which the Plan is based are in the supporting documents listed at the end of the Plan and in the Court Orders by which the Plan is adopted. The Land Use chapter defines land use categories, specifies the site conditions used to qualify land for each category of use, and explains allowed uses or uses which may be established under certain conditions. Other chapters contain policies that are less site specific. Cross-references are provided where pitfalls to using the Plan are anticipated. Chapter 10 of the plan includes specific community or design plans, where certain policies may apply that do not apply elsewhere under the plan. I-3

Most development proposals need only comply with provisions of implementing measures such as the zoning and subdivision ordinances. Some may require a zone change. Changes of the zoning map may be approved to allow a use equal to, or of less intensity than, the Plan specifies. If the Plan does not accommodate the requested zone change, the applicant may request a Plan amendment. In most cases, the easiest way to accomplish this is to seek reclassification on the land use map based on the criteria for designating the desired category and showing that the site in question meets those criteria (see Chapter 11 for amendment procedures). If a more fundamental change is desired, such as a change in the County's goals or definitions, the same procedure must be followed. However, changes must comply with state and regional goals and result in a Plan which is internally consistent. IMPLEMENTATION COSTS Policies throughout this Plan, as well as in Chapter 11, direct how the Plan will be implemented. The costs involved and the limitations on County financial resources will require that priorities be set to insure that implementation of the Plan is financially responsible. WHAT DOES THIS PLAN DO? Overall Perspective Recognize urban-rural identities Resource preservation emphasis in farm, forest, and rural areas Manage growth in urban areas Diverse, interesting, and active urban community in the northwest corner of the County People activities focused at urban centers Landscapes, rivers and other natural attractions protected. Prospects for the Urban Community Energy savings in land use patterns, housing, and transportation Desirable and affordable housing Livable neighborhoods More jobs for present and future residents I-4

Protected open spaces, streams, and hillsides Cost efficiency in providing roads, sewers, and other public services Fairer system of distributing necessary costs. I-5