Edmonton City Centre Airport Demonstration Plan

Similar documents
Strategic Growth in the Rangeview Area Structure Plan

CITY OF EDMONTON ANNEXATION APPLICATION APPENDIX 7.0 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

Market and Financial Inputs to Neighbourhood Centres Policy

Hillsborough County Population and Employment Projections and Allocations DECEMBER 2017

DRAFT. Prepared for: CBRE CONSULTING CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO MAYOR S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT JANUARY 2011

Economic Impact Analysis of the Downtown Green Line Vision Plan and Georgia Multi-modal Passenger Terminal

2015 Edmonton and Region Household Travel Survey

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building

Economic and Fiscal Analysis of Northlands Redevelopment (Version 1)

REGIONAL EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PURPOSE 3.0 DEFINITIONS. Edmonton Metropolitan Region Planning Toolkit

Update to the Memorial Park Master Plan. Initial Community Consultation Meeting Monday December 5 th, 2011

Nith Peninsula, Brant County Fiscal Impact Study

HEMSON GROWTH FORECAST

CAPITAL REGION POPULATION & EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS REPORT

C REVISED ATTACHMENT 5

Fiscal Analysis November 14, Fiscal Analysis Fiscal Conditions Project Background

2017 Preliminary Operating and Capital Budgets. November 22, 2016

Draft-Fiscal Impact Analysis of Union Square and Boynton Yards

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT

C ATTACHMENT 4

Recommended Portfolio of Communities for One Calgary ( )

Fiscal Impact Analysis

ATTACHMENT 1 Table 1- Summary of municipal actions in support of the Regional Growth Strategy

Hemson Growth Forecast / Planning Assumptions for Growth Scenarios Tested

2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey

City of Kingston Report to Council Report Number Mayor and Members of Council Lanie Hurdle, Commissioner, Community Services

University Link LRT Extension

CITY OF GUELPH DEVELOPMENT CHARGE BACKGROUND STUDY. Consolidated Report. Includes: Development Charge Background Study, Dated: November 1, 2013

ECONOMIC ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES PAPER

OFF-SITE LEVIES UDI ALBERTA & CHBA ALBERTA RECOMMENDATIONS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT:

EX33.3. HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d Development Charges Background Study

Salt Lake County. Townships and Unincorporated Islands Fiscal Evaluation

2009 Financial Report to Citizens

Presentation to College Park City Council. June 1, 2015

LONG-TERM FINANCIAL MASTER PLAN. City of Brampton. HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d.

Economic and Fiscal Impact of the Arizona Public University Enterprise

EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS AND BASELINE PROJECTIONS FOR THE TOMORROW PLAN SASAKI. From

LEVEL OF SERVICE / COST & REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

2019 THREE YEAR OPERATING PLAN APPROVED BY COUNCIL DECEMBER 10, 2018

TOWN OF AURORA DEVELOPMENT CHARGE BACKGROUND STUDY AND PROPOSED BY-LAW OFFICE CONSOLIDATION MARCH 12, (As Amended April 8 th, 2014)

Report to: Development Services Committee Date: June 26, 2017

CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF CORNWALL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2015 Preliminary Operating and Capital Budgets. March 3, 2015

EXHIBIT 1. Salt Lake City

CITY OF SAULT STE. MARIE 2016 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY. Draft for Public Circulation and Comment

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT

2018 Development Charges Background Study The Cost of Growth. Council Workshop #2

Toronto Employment Survey 2017

Branch Urban Planning and Environment

XH-2-1 BUDGET AMENDMENT: SPRINGDALE LIBRARY SITE AND. Dan Kraszewski, Senior Executive Director, Planning Design and

2014 Development Charges

2019 PRELIMINARY OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS

Chapter 5. REMAINING REVIEW FACTORS

Prepared & Presented by. Shelley Eliopoulos. Treasurer/Director of Finance

Introduction to Development Charges (DCs)

City-Driven Major High Profile Projects Requiring 2006 Funding. January 2006

Development Charges. Someone Has to Pay, But Who?

General Fund (001) Five-Year Outlook. Expenditures:

REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGE BACKGROUND STUDY

2018 Development Charges Background Study. Report For Public Consultation. HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d.

2018 Spring Pulse Survey Overview

Public Policy Issues and Sustainability in Southern California. Financing Infrastructure Development

2018 Q3. Brookfield Residential Properties Inc. September 30, 2018 Chief Executive Officer s Report

Township of Grosse Ile

WORKSHOP 1: LONG-RANGE FINANCIAL PLANNING

TIGER IV. Benefit Cost Analysis. Minot International Airport Access Road. Minot, ND

Table of Contents. Capital - 2

2018 Budget Public Budget Consultation Meeting November 16 th, 2017

DETROIT LAKES CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY, June 19, 2018

City of Cornwall Development Charges Background Study. Council Presentation

Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements of. The City of Spruce Grove

TRUST AND CONFIDENCE

STAFF REPORT Financial Planning & Purchasing. Finance & Strategic Planning Committee Meeting Council/Committee Date: September 18, 2017

2018 Draft Operating and Capital Budgets Introduction

2016 WCGFOA Conference

Report to: General Committee Meeting Date: December 5, 2017

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ST. CATHARINES, ONTARIO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016

Prioritizing Transportation Projects. Presentation Travis Gaede

Ranking of 1998 Per Capita Expenditures Cities Over 2,500 in Population

2016 Budget Highlights

City of Pickering 2017 Development Charges Background Study

Branch: Urban Planning and Environment

Citizen Budget Budget Consultation Online Summary Report. November 25, Overview:

River Edge Fiscal Impact Analysis

Business Plan: Land Use Planning

The Corporation of the City of Cambridge

Highlights From The Approved 2013 Budget Budget in Brief

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa rating to the Village of Glenview's (IL) $18.6 million General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2012A

Urban Growth Area Review City of Bellingham Preliminary UGA Growth Allocation Proposal

CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF ST. MARYS CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2011

Capital and Debt. Capital Expenditures 2017 to 2021 Capital Plan. Capital Plan Introduction. PSAB Tangible Capital Asset Five year Capital Plan

RECOMMENDATIONS IN THIS REPORT HAVE BEEN REVISED TO REFLECT MINOR EDITORIAL CHANGES. CHANGES ARE NOTED IN REGULAR UNDERLINED TYPE.

09/03/2016 Communicating on Infrastructure Investments in Calgary

TAX INCREMENT PROJECT PLAN

Presentation by: City Manager, Murray Totland *check against delivery

Ontario Building Code Administration

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES. Goal 1: [CI] (EFF. 7/16/90)

2015 ASSESSMENT GROWTH BUSINESS CASE OVERVIEW REQUEST BY SERVICE PROGRAM. Funding Required for Growth ($) Program # Service Grouping

Transcription:

Edmonton City Centre Airport Demonstration Plan Economic Impact Analysis June 15, 2009 Prepared for the City of Edmonton Page 1 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Study Purpose 2 Determine the current and future economic and financial impacts of the redevelopment of the Edmonton City Centre Airport (ECCA). Consider the economic and financial impacts redevelopment will have on neighouring and other affected lands. Complete a benefit cost analysis of the Demonstration Plan from the perspective of the City of Edmonton. Page 2 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Demonstration Plan Study Area The ECCA Lands (Study Area) includes 217.1 hectares (536.5 acres) of land at the Edmonton City Centre Airport as defined by the areas highlighted in the figure. In addition to the Study Area, other growth and development associated with redevelopment of the ECCA have been incorporated where appropriate in the economic impact analysis. Page 3 of 51 Report 2009DCM032-3 Study Area

Summary of Results 4 Redevelopment of the ECCA Lands, as defined in the Demonstration Plan, is estimated to result in a net fiscal benefit to the City of Edmonton. This benefit, as measured by the equivalent to an average annual reduction in municipal taxes, averages 2.4% over the forecast period. The net benefit of redevelopment generally increases over the forecast period, reaching an equivalent tax benefit of 5% by the end of the forecast period. The overall benefit to the City of Edmonton resulting from redevelopment of the ECCA lands is estimated to total $93 million (2009 $ net present value over 35 years using a 10% discount rate). This benefit is expected to range between $55 and $168 million when the discount rate applied to future costs and revenues is varied by ±3%. Page 4 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Analysis Concepts 5 The Municipal Fiscal Impact analysis and Benefit-Cost analysis utilize several important concepts: Incremental Impact: The economic impact analysis measures the change in economic circumstances resulting from redevelopment of the ECCA Lands as defined by the Demonstration Plan, as compared to a continuation of airport operations (Base Case). Net Present Value: Brings all future costs and revenues to current day dollars (2009 $). Discount Rate: The net present value has been calculated using a real discount rate of 10% (Canada Federal Treasury Board). Real Dollars (not inflated): All figures used in this analysis are in 2009 $. Page 5 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Analysis Process 6 The economic impact analysis relies on information regarding the scope of development, costs and revenues associated with development and the timing of these events that has been prepared by the City and other members of the consulting team. The data employed in this analysis includes information obtained from the City and consulting team as recent as June 12, 2009. The analysis attempts to include all costs and revenues relevant to the fiscal position of the City of Edmonton (subject to availability of data) to provide a realistic estimate of the net economic benefits associated with the ECCA Demonstration Plan. Where judgement was required in interpreting available information and making assumptions integral to the analysis, it was practice to err on the side of understating the benefits of the redevelopment proposal. Page 6 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Incremental Analysis: Base Case vs Redevelopment 7 To evaluate the economic impacts of redevelopment, a comparison has been made between: The Base Case (no change in the current status and operation of the ECCA). The ECCA Redevelopment Scenario as defined by the Demonstration Plan. For this analysis, the Base Case utilizes the population and employment projections developed for the Municipal Development Plan (The Way We Grow) and Transportation Master Plan (The Way We Move). The EECA Redevelopment Scenario incorporates adjustments to the Base Case population and employment forecasts by adding some incremental growth in both categories, and shifting growth from other locations in Edmonton to the ECCA Lands and other areas determined to be impacted by redevelopment of the ECCA. Page 7 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

The Base Case Page 8 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Base Case: General Assumptions 9 The Edmonton City Centre Airport would continue operations in a manner similar to its current state. There will be no substantial City of Edmonton supported costs associated with continued operation of the ECCA. The City of Edmonton will grow and develop in a manner similar to that assumed for the development of the Municipal Development Plan and Transportation Master Plan. Issues associated with air services at the City Centre Airport or in the Edmonton Region as a whole are outside the scope of this analysis. Page 9 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Base Case: Edmonton Population Growth 10 Based on the 2006-2041 forecast used in the City of Edmonton Transit Oriented Development Population & Employment Forecasts documents. Adjusted the base year data to match the 2008 municipal census. Extended the forecast to 2044 (35 year forecast). Total growth over the forecast period is 359,000 increasing the City s population to 1.19 million. City of Edmonton 1,200,000 1,100,000 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 2044 Page 10 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Base Case: Distribution of Population Growth 11 Total City of Edmonton growth reflects an average annual rate equal to 1.17%. Most population growth will be suburban - comprising approximately 61% of the total. Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and infill development is projected to be approximately 39% of the total. Suburban Infill TOD 30% 9% 61% Page 11 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Base Case: Suburban Growth 12 Growth was allocated throughout the suburbs in the southwest, southeast, west, north, northeast and northwest areas of the City of Edmonton. Suburban growth in the Base Case is projected to total over 241,000 over the next 35 years. Suburban Growth Suburban Growth Page 12 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Base Case: Infill Development 13 Infill growth occurred in mature areas due to the development of the High Frequency Bus Lines, and other Compact Growth and intensification assumptions. Infill Development Infill development in the Base Case is projected to total approximately 34,000 over the next 35 years. Page 13 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Base Case: Transit Oriented Development (TOD) 14 The proposed LRT network includes a 5-legged system which will expand out to the northeast, northwest, southeast, southwest and west areas of the City. TOD Population Growth LRT Line TOD related population growth in the Base Case is projected to total approximately 120,000 over the next 35 years. Page 14 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

The ECCA Redevelopment Scenario Page 15 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Redevelopment Timeline 16 ECCA aviation operations are assumed to continue until the end of 2015. Demolition required to facilitate redevelopment would begin in 2016 and continue for 15 years. Investment in infrastructure required to support development would begin in 2017 and continue for 25 years. All development in the Study Area would begin in 2018 and continue for 25 years (except the NAIT campus). The NAIT campus development in the Study Area would begin in 2018 and be completed in 10 years. Three NAIT residences (two in the Study Area and one outside the Study Area) will be developed by 2025. Page 16 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

ECCA Redevelopment Airport Operations 1-Jan-10 31-Dec-15 6 Years Demolition 1-Jan-16 31-Dec-30 Infrastructure Development 1-Jan-17 31-Dec-41 15 Years 25 Years Timeline ECCA Mixed Use Office/Institutional/Industrial 1-Jan-18 31-Dec-42 25 Years Key events relevant to the economic analysis of the redevelopment of the ECCA are identified in the timeline. This timeline reflects the assumptions utilized in developing the economic impact analysis. ECCA Residential Development 1-Jan-18 31-Dec-42 NAIT Research Park 1-Jan-18 31-Dec-42 NAIT Campus Development 1-Jan-18 31-Dec-27 ECCA Commercial Development 1-Jan-18 31-Dec-42 ECCA Business Industrial 1-Jan-18 31-Dec-42 NAIT Off Site Res 1,000 1-Jul-15 NAIT ECCA Site Res 1,000 1-Jul-20 10 Years NAIT ECCA Site Res 1,000 1-Jul-25 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 25 Years 25 Years 25 Years 25 Years 17 2010 35 Years 2044 Page 17 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

ECCA Redevelopment Scenario: Population Growth 18 The total population growth on the airport site is estimated to be 24,300, including 2,000 NAIT students (in residences). Edmonton City Centre Airport An additional 9,000 people are assumed to move to areas adjacent to the airport as a result of proximity to the ECCA redevelopment and to the Downtown/Oliver areas as a result of removal of the Airport Protection Overlay (APO). An additional 1,000 NAIT students (in residence) would be located east of 103 street and south of 118 avenue. APO Redevelopment Page 18 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

ECCA Redevelopment Scenario: Source of Population Shifts 19 The total population shifts resulting from redevelopment of the ECCA is estimated to be approximately 33,300 people. It is estimated that approximately 28,300 are reallocated from growth projected to occur elsewhere in the City. 5,000 people are assumed to be relocated from outside the City of Edmonton (from elsewhere in the Edmonton region). Edmonton 15% Edmonton Region 85% Page 19 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Suburban Population Relocation ECCA Redevelopment Growth Suburban Sources of Population Growth The majority of the population shift associated with the redevelopment of the Redevelopment has been a relocation of projected population growth from various neighbourhoods in the suburban areas. The total population growth relocated from the suburban areas to the ECCA (consistent with the Demonstration Plan) was approximately 25,300 people. 20 Page 20 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

TOD Population Relocation ECCA Redevelopment Growth TOD Sources of Population Growth LRT Line A portion of the population shifting as a result of redevelopment of the ECCA has been assumed to come from proposed (or in some cases existing) projected TOD development along each LRT line. In total, approximately 3,000 people were relocated to the ECCA from Transit Oriented Development projects to occur along the LRT lines planned for Edmonton. 21 Page 21 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

ECCA Redevelopment Scenario: Distribution of Population Growth 22 The ECCA Study Area will accommodate 24,300 people, equal to approximately 6% of total City growth to 2044. Suburban Infill TOD ECCA Study Area Other ECCA Related Redevelopment Other ECCA Related Redevelopment (in adjacent neighbourhoods and Downtown and Oliver) would be 9,000 people, equal to approximately 2% of total City growth to 2044. 9% 29% 6% 2% 54% Page 22 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

ECCA Redevelopment Scenario: Employment 23 A total of 5,130 jobs will be reallocated as a result of the ECCA redevelopment. 1,830 jobs are attributed to various forms of office and commercial employment in the ECCA Study Area. 1,920 jobs are attributed to the NAIT Expansion (NAIT Staff and Research Park). 1,380 jobs are attributed to the Downtown/Oliver APO Removal. Category ECCA Commercial ECCA Office ECCA General Business ECCA Mixed Use NAIT Academic Staff NAIT Applied Knowledge Research Park Downtown/Oliver APO Removal Total Employment 770 400 200 460 1,170 750 1,380 5,130 Page 23 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

ECCA Redevelopment Scenario: Employment Shifts 24 Edmonton Airports estimated that currently there are just over 900 aviation related workers employed at the ECCA. It has been assumed these workers will relocate outside of Edmonton elsewhere within the Edmonton Region. With redevelopment, total employment on the airport site and related redevelopment in the downtown and Oliver areas, is projected to be 5,130. It is estimated that approximately 600 jobs associated with NAIT s Applied Knowledge Research Park and associated development in the Study Area will be incremental to the City and Edmonton region. 6,000 4,500 3,000 1,500 0-1,500 Edmonton Outside Region 5,130 605 4,525 ECCA Redevelopment Edmonton Region No Net Change 910-910 Airport Aviation Page 24 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Employment Relocation A portion of the employment associated with the redevelopment of the ECCA came from projected employment growth in various neighbourhoods in the suburbs. The total employment growth reallocated from the suburbs to the ECCA was approximately 4,525 jobs. Another 605 jobs are assumed to be incremental to the City and region. 25 Page 25 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Municipal Fiscal Impacts Page 26 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Municipal Fiscal Impact: Defined 27 Municipal Fiscal Impact Analysis is the determination of how a particular development affects the financial position of the municipality. Definition of Scenarios: The impact measured in this analysis reflects the difference between the Base Case (continued operation of the ECCA) and the ECCA Redevelopment Scenario (consistent with the ECCA Demonstration Plan). Measurement: Impacts consider all relevant and substantial costs and revenues to the City (where data is available). Results: Change in municipal tax rate equivalents for Edmonton ratepayers. Page 27 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Municipal Operations: Operating Costs & Revenues 28 Operating costs for the following program areas were assumed to grow with population: Police Library Parks Recreation Facilities Fire Transit Operating costs associated with roads costs were assumed to change with the length of roads. Operating costs for all other areas were assumed to be constant and not change with growth. Projection of City operating revenues (excluding property taxes) were based on 2009 cost recovery rates. Page 28 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Municipal Operations: Suburban vs Infill Development 29 Preliminary studies currently being done by the Office of Infrastructure and Funding Strategy indicate that for every $1 a developer spends on infrastructure in a suburban neighbourhood, it is estimated the City spends approximately $0.80. The shift in location of development, primarily from suburban areas to the ECCA Lands and surrounding areas, will result in a cost saving to the City. Based on the pattern of redistribution, it has been estimated that the cost saving associated with a shift of suburban to infill development will be approximately $3,100 per capita. Page 29 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Municipal Operations: Capital Costs 30 Base Case: Capital expenditures were assumed to grow with population. ECCA Redevelopment Scenario Select Engineering estimated the capital costs to redevelop the ECCA Study Area ($203.8 million). Other City costs for transit, environment and safety, social infrastructure and corporate infrastructure were assumed to be 80% of development costs. Page 30 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Taxable Assessment: Base Case 31 Residential assessment is projected to increase from $100.5 billion in 2009 to $150.8 billion in 2044. Non-residential assessment is projected to increase from $34.4 billion in 2009 to $51.5 billion in 2044. $250 $200 $150 $100 Residential Non-Residential $ Billion (City Totals) Total assessment is projected to increase by 50% over the next 35 years. $50 $0 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 2044 Page 31 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Taxable Assessment: ECCA Redevelopment Study Area 32 As the airport is redeveloped, existing assessment will be lost and replaced with residential and new nonresidential development. $4.0 $3.5 Redevelopment - Residential Redevelopment - Non-Residential Existing Assessment $ Billion Redevelopment of the ECCA will result in a loss of an estimated $42 million associated with existing development in the Study Area. It has been assumed this reduction is phased in over four years beginning in 2013. Assessment associated with redevelopment in the Study Area begins in 2018 and grows to $3.95 billion by 2042. $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 $0 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 2044 Page 32 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Taxable Assessment: NAIT 33 Academic facilities as part of the NAIT development in the Study Area are exempt from municipal property taxation. Non-academic facilities have been assumed to be taxable as follows: Two residences: 100% of estimated assessment. Business park: 50% of estimated assessment. This incremental assessment has been included in the ECCA Redevelopment - Assessment. Page 33 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Taxable Assessment: Change in Residential Assessment 34 Redevelopment of the ECCA will result in a small net reduction in taxable residential assessment in Edmonton. While this reduction varies over the forecast period, it peaks at approximately $130 million, which is small compared to the residential assessment base in the City - equal to over $100 billion. Total residential assessment will decline marginally in the ECCA Redevelopment Scenario due to a shift from primarily single family suburban development in the Base Case to primarily multi-family development in the ECCA Lands, adjacent neighbourhoods and the Downtown and Oliver areas as a result of redevelopment. While the total population in the ECCA Redevelopment Scenario is slightly higher than the Base Case, the average residential assessment per capita drops because of the shift in dwelling unit types. Page 34 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Taxable Assessment: Change in Non-Residential 35 Redevelopment of the ECCA will result in an initial net reduction in taxable non-residential assessment in ECCA. There is an estimated $42 million assessment loss associated with existing development at the airport. This reduction is offset over time by an increase in non-residential development in the Study Area and the Downtown and Oliver areas as a result of redevelopment. By the end of the forecast period, all of the lost assessment associated with existing development at the ECCA is replaced by new non-residential assessment. Page 35 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

ECCA Land Development 36 It has been assumed that the City of Edmonton would develop the ECCA lands and incur the costs associated with the development of the infrastructure required to service the land as well as the soft costs associated with marketing the serviced lands. Revenues associated with the sale of serviced lands have been estimated by Colliers. These estimates have been utilized in this analysis, although the timing has been adjusted to conform to the 25 year development horizon. Page 36 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

ECCA Land Development: Development Costs 37 Infrastructure Costs ( Hard Costs ): These include the costs for the following (Select Eng.): Roads (Local and Collector) Water, Sanitary & Storm Systems Other Costs (e.g. Fencing, walkways, geotechnical testing, etc.) Marketing & Sales ( Soft Costs ): Include the cost of marketing and completing the land sales transactions (estimated to be 20% of hard costs - Colliers). Page 37 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

ECCA Land Development: Net Development Impact 38 The costs associated with development include the hard costs associated with infrastructure construction and soft costs associated with marketing the lands. These costs are estimated to total $8.9 million and have been assumed to be evenly spread over 35 years between 2017 and 2041. Revenues associated with serviced land sales are estimated to be $8.2 million/ yr (2018-2042) for residential and $89 million for non-residential to be collected at four points in time (2018, 2019, 2026 and 2036). $60 $45 $30 $15 Expenditures $ Million Revenues Non-residential land development revenues. Infrastructure costs associated with redevelopment end in 2041. $0 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 2044 Page 38 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

ECCA Redevelopment Scenario: Municipal Fiscal Impacts Municipal Operations show a net benefit to the City as a result of a substantial reduction in net costs that exceed the small decline assessment. Land Development nets a positive financial benefit to the City. The total net benefit/cost to the City is equal to the sum of the net Municipal Operating benefit plus the net Land Development benefit. 150 + 113 75 38 0-38 -75 - -113 Change in Assessment Change in Net Costs Net Municipal Benefit/Cost Land Development Revenues Total Net Benefit/Cost Municipal Operations Page 39 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Tax Rate Equivalents A Note on Projected Tax Rates 40 To simplify the analysis, all relevant future municipal costs and benefits have been assumed to fall on the municipal tax rate. It is recognized that this is not consistent with current City of Edmonton accounting and budgeting practices. However it has been employed to allow the impacts to be reflected in a single measure. As a result, all municipal costs and benefits included in the analysis have been converted into a what is termed - a tax rate equivalent. The tax rate impact results presented in subsequent slides are NOT a projection of future municipal tax rates, but rather a measure by which the results of the ECCA Redevelopment Scenario can be compared to the Base Case (continued aviation operations from the ECCA). The municipal tax rate equivalent has been estimated to balance the City s budget in each year of the forecast, so there is no surplus or deficit created and no net change in reserves. Page 40 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Municipal Fiscal Impact: Tax Rate Equivalent Impacts 41 The municipal impacts, as measured by the property tax rate equivalents, have been estimated by comparing the ECCA Redevelopment Scenario against the Base Case. Over time the impacts vary depending on costs and revenues received by the City in each year. When the change in tax rate equivalents is positive (greater than zero), there would be a tax rate equivalent increase with the the ECCA Redevelopment Scenario. When the change in tax rate equivalents is negative (less than zero), there would be a tax rate equivalent reduction with the ECCA Redevelopment Scenario. 1% 0% -1% -2% -3% -4% -5% Increase (above zero) indicates a cost as a result of ECCA Redevelopment. Decrease (below zero) indicates a benefit as a result of ECCA Redevelopment. % Change in Tax Rate Equivalents -6% 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 2044 Page 41 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Municipal Fiscal Impact: Tax Rate Equivalent Impacts 42 There is an increase in the tax rate equivalent in 2017 as a result of the investment in infrastructure starting in this year. Generally the tax rate benefits of redevelopment increase over time (as denoted by a reduction in the tax rate equivalent) as development occurs and tax revenues and land development revenues accrue. The spikes in reduced tax rate equivalents are due to non-residential land development revenues assumed to be received in 2018, 2019, 2026 and 2036. A tax equivalent benefit also occurs in 2041 with the end of investment in infrastructure costs. The average change in tax rate equivalents is a reduction of 2.4%. % Change in Tax Rate Equavlents 1% 0% -1% -2% -3% -4% -5% -6% 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 2044 Page 42 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Municipal Fiscal Impact: Tax Rate Equivalent Impacts 43 The major downward spikes in equivalent tax rates in 2018, 2019, 2026 and 2036 are related to the timing of non-residential land development revenues. 2018 ($20 million): Commercial, General Business and Mixed Use revenues. 2019 ($47 million): NAIT and Mixed Use revenues. 2026 & 2036 ($11 million each year): Commercial, General Business and Mixed Use revenues. The costs associated with infrastructure development for the ECCA Redevelopment Scenario end in 2041. 1% 0% -1% -2% -3% -4% -5% % Change in Tax Rate Equavlents Non-residential land development revenues. End of infrastructure costs associated with redevelopment in 2041. -6% 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 2044 Page 43 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Benefit-Cost Analysis Page 44 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Benefit Cost Analysis 45 Benefit-cost analysis is an analytical approach used to consistently evaluate investments to determine their desirability. Generally, when a project or investment is favorable, it has a positive Net Present Value. Net Present Value is a process of discounting future costs and revenues associated with a project to put them into current dollar terms. The Discount Rate is used to adjust all future costs and revenues to reflect the time value of money. Page 45 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

ECCA Redevelopment Scenario: Net Present Value 46 The value to the City of Edmonton of redeveloping the ECCA is estimated to total $93 million (Net Present Value) when a discount rate of 10% is applied to all future benefits and costs. Testing the sensitivity of this result by varying the discount rate by ±3% provides a range of positive values between $55 million and $168 million (for a discount rate of 13% and 7% respectively). $200 $160 $120 $80 $40 $0 $93 Net Present Value $ Million $168 $55 10% 7% 13% Discount Rate Page 46 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

ECCA Redevelopment Scenario: Other Benefits 47 In addition to the quantifiable benefits and costs included in the net present value calculation, there are other potential benefits associated with the ECCA Demonstration Plan that have not been quantified. These include: The development is consistent with the Municipal Development Plan (The Way We Grow) and Transportation Master Plan. It will improve the viability of the NW LRT leg and transit in general. There will be an appreciation in the value of lands adjacent to the ECCA with the removal of aviation activity. There will be synergies associated with having the City s major post secondary institutions located centrally and connected to an integrated LRT system. Page 47 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

ECCA Redevelopment Scenario: Factors Affecting NPV 48 There are several important assumptions incorporated in the analysis that have a significant impact on the results: Timing of Redevelopment: As most of the benefits associated with redevelopment occur near the end of the forecast period, implementing redevelopment sooner would generate a more positive benefit-cost result. Similarly, delaying redevelopment will reduce the current value of these net benefits. Source of Population & Employment Growth: It has been conservatively assumed that most of the population and employment shifts to the ECCA are from other future growth within the City of Edmonton, primarily suburban neighbourhoods. It is possible the City could attract more growth from elsewhere in the Region and outside the Edmonton Region, which would increase the value of redevelopment to the City of Edmonton. Page 48 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Conclusions Page 49 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Conclusions: Municipal Fiscal Impacts 50 Redevelopment of the ECCA, as defined in the Demonstration Plan, would result in the equivalent of a net tax saving to the City of Edmonton. On average, over the 35 year forecast period, the benefit of redevelopment of the ECCA Lands is estimated to be the equivalent of a municipal tax reduction of 2.4% per year. Over the long term, the net tax benefits of redeveloping the ECCA Lands increases. By the end of the forecast period, the benefit of redevelopment is estimated to reach the equivalent of a 5% reduction in municipal tax rates. Page 50 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -

Conclusions: Benefit Cost Analysis 51 The value of redeveloping the ECCA Lands is, in aggregate, a net benefit to the City of Edmonton s financial position. The net present value of all quantifiable future costs and benefits associated with the redevelopment of the ECCA Lands is estimated to be $93 million. This assumes that all future benefits and costs are discounted at a rate of 10% (Federal Treasury Board Guidelines). Varying the discount rate used to estimate the net present value by ±3% yields the following results: - $168 million at a discount rate of 7% - $55 million at a discount rate of 13% The redevelopment of the ECCA Lands consistent with the Demonstration Plan will afford other benefits to the City not included in the NPV calculation. Page 51 of 51 Report 2009DCM032 -