21st February Note On Valuation of State Government Securities & Risk Assessment for trades in such securities

Similar documents
TO ALL MEMBERS & OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS

Date: 25 th Feb Securities Segment Note on Methodology for Imposition of Volatility Margin

Indian Sovereign Yield Curve using Nelson-Siegel-Svensson Model

Common stock prices 1. New York Stock Exchange indexes (Dec. 31,1965=50)2. Transportation. Utility 3. Finance

XML Publisher Balance Sheet Vision Operations (USA) Feb-02

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, MARCH 21 AT 4 PM

OTHER DEPOSITS FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DEPOSIT BARKAT SAVING ACCOUNT

Amount raised from Primary Market. Turnover in Secondary Market

Amount raised from Primary Market. Turnover in Secondary Market

Wholesale Debt Market Segment 5

Wholesale Debt Market Segment 5

THE CLEARING CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED Risk Management Department Consultation Paper

CITI Bank Bangkok branch. Set B Capital Item1 Capital Structure Table 2 Capital of Foreign Banks Branchs Unit : THB. Item June 30, 2009

ESTIMATION OF A BENCHMARK CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD) CURVE

Ch. 13 Practice Questions Solution

The Clearing Corporation of India Limited

The equity derivatives market: The state of the art

QUESTION 2. QUESTION 3 Which one of the following is most indicative of a flexible short-term financial policy?

Chapter 6. Solution: Austin Electronics. State of Economy Sales Probability

CCIL All Sovereign Bonds Index (CASBI) Golaka C Nath, Gaurav Yadav and Aparna Vachharajani Introduction

Methodology of Calculation of the Benchmark Certificate of Deposit Curve

EMPLOYER MUNICIPAL QUARTERLY WITHHOLDING BOOKLET

FBIL - Certificates of Deposit (FBIL - CD) Benchmark

Canara Robeco Short Term Fund Open Ended Debt Scheme

Spheria Australian Smaller Companies Fund

Pay or Play Penalties Look-back Measurement Method Examples

Calcom Vision Limited. FY18-19 Q2 (July-Sept 18) Investors Release 29 th October, 2018

EMPLOYER JEDZ MONTHLY WITHHOLDING BOOKLET

Affordable Care Act Implementation Alert

Factor Leave Accruals. Accruing Vacation and Sick Leave

VALUE AVERAGING - TECHNOLOGY MODEL PORTFOLIO - INVESTMENT SUMMARY

Executive Summary. July 17, 2015

METHODOLOGY FOR COMPUTATION OF BENCHMARK FORWARD PREMIA AND MIFOR CURVE SECTION 1: OVERVIEW OF THE INDIAN FX SWAP MARKET

Performance Report October 2018

Business & Financial Services December 2017

BANK OF GUYANA. BANKING SYSTEM STATISTICAL ABSTRACT Website:

Review of Registered Charites Compliance Rates with Annual Reporting Requirements 2016

HIPIOWA - IOWA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION Unaudited Balance Sheet As of July 31

CPA Australia Plan Your Own Enterprise Competition

FOR RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 17 AT 11:30 AM

HIPIOWA - IOWA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION Unaudited Balance Sheet As of January 31

Newark Income Tax Office Payroll Withholding

BANK OF GUYANA. BANKING SYSTEM STATISTICAL ABSTRACT Website:

PUBLIC DEBT MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH 2018

The What And Why Of LDI

Financial & Business Highlights For the Year Ended June 30, 2017

Big Walnut Local School District

Exam 1 Problem Solving Questions Review

20 Investments Thomas County Bonds 60,000 Interest Receivable* 500 Cash 60,500 * $60,000 6% 50/360

WESTWOOD LUTHERAN CHURCH Summary Financial Statement YEAR TO DATE - February 28, Over(Under) Budget WECC Fund Actual Budget

Please scroll to find the 2018 and 2019 global fund holiday calendars.

CANARA ROBECO DYNAMIC BOND FUND JULY 2018

Algo Trading System RTM

] [ where, C t is the Cash Rate; T t is the Tom Rate; S Value Date is the Spot Settlement Date.

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

Methodology of Calculation of the Benchmark Certificate of Deposit Curve

Development of Economy and Financial Markets of Kazakhstan

23 rd GST Council Meet

7. Foreign Investments in India

Financial Report for the Month of SEPTEMBER

Key IRS Interest Rates After PPA

Research Department Bangladesh Bank

FBIL. Newsletter FROM CHAIRPERSON S DESK: Section 1: New Developments. Section 2: MARKET WATCH ISSUE:1 MARCH 2019

Must be postmarked not later than. Jan January 1 - January 31. Feb February 1 - February 28. Mar March 1 - March 31

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND SCHEME,

You work hard to earn money. Invest it wisely

You work hard to earn money. Invest it wisely

Cost Estimation of a Manufacturing Company

IGST REFUNDS - EXPORTS ROLE OF CUSTOMS

Government Borrowing from Domestic Sources

Debt Valuation Policy. March 2017

You work hard to earn money. Invest it wisely

January 2018 Data Release

You work hard to earn money. Invest it wisely

Weighted Shares Beginning balance Issued shares Reacquired shares. Shares Outstanding

MESA ROYALTY TRUST FEDERAL INCOME TAX INFORMATION

4. PROFIT OR LOSS PRIOR TO INCORPORATION

Chapter Thirteen In class practice

FEDERATION OF INDIAN INDUSTRY C-201, AWHO, SECTOR-49, Sohna Road, Gurugram INDIA

PHOENIX ENERGY MARKETING CONSULTANTS INC. HISTORICAL NATURAL GAS & CRUDE OIL PRICES UPDATED TO July, 2018

LOAN MARKET DATA AND ANALYTICS BY THOMSON REUTERS LPC

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, MAY 25 AT 3 PM

For financial adviser use only. Not to be used with retail clients. Guide to Backtesting

Government of the Punjab Punjab Pension Fund ANNUAL REPORT

HUD NSP-1 Reporting Apr 2010 Grantee Report - New Mexico State Program

Annual Investment Review Alief Independent School District Board Meeting January 17, 2017

You work hard to earn money. Invest it wisely

Mechanics of Cash Flow Forecasting

Regional overview Gisborne

Contract Certainty Subscription Market Progress Update for FSA

TR-1: Standard form for notification of major holdings

TR-1: Standard form for notification of major holdings

TR-1: Standard form for notification of major holdings

Six good reasons for choosing DNB in the new banking environment

April 16, BSE Limited Listing Department Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers Dalal Street Mumbai Dear Sirs,

Amendments to Regulatory Notice of the Futures Trading Rules

(Internet version) Financial & Statistical Report November 2018

Key IRS Interest Rates After PPA

PRESENTATION TO UNCTAD WORKSHOP

Methodology of Calculation of the Benchmark Treasury Bills Curve

Transcription:

21st February 2006 Note On Valuation of State Government Securities & Risk Assessment for trades in such securities CCIL has been examining the issues relating to valuation of State government and other illiquid securities and risk assessment for trades in such securities for the last few years. A detailed note on this subject was put up in CCIL s website in February 05. Based on the paper and the feedback received from the members, meetings were organized at CCIL on 17 th November 2005 and 14 th February 06 to have further discussion in the matter. Major players in State Government securities market participated in the meeting. CCIL presented analysis based on trade data for the period August 2004 to December 2005. 2. Based on the discussions during the meeting, the following approach is now proposed to be adopted by CCIL for valuation of State government securities and for arriving at Margin Factors for such securities: A. Valuation: CCIL would work out an Yield Spread on Sovereign ZCYC for valuation of State Government securities. The spread would be worked out from the trade data on State Government Securities. The underlying assumption will be that the spread remains same irrespective of the issuer (State Government) or of the tenor. The spread would be worked out at the end of each month and would usually be used throughout the next month. The detailed process is appended as Annexure - I. B. Margin factors for State Government securities: As the risks for trades in State Government securities are higher due to significant illiquidity in the market and also due to high spread expected for any Buy/ Sale of a State Government security by CCIL under a condition of default, an impact of illiquidity would be built into the margin factors applicable for illiquid securities. The margin factors would be set as under: i) for Liquid securities (those which have more than 10 trades per day or more of Face Value of Rs. 5 crs. or more during the previous calendar quarter) - the value of their respective 3-day VaR numbers ii) iii) for Semi-liquid securities (those having average of 1 to 10 trades per day of Face Value of Rs. 5 crs. or more in the previous calendar quarter) - 1.5 times of their respective 3-day VaR numbers. for Illiquid securities (those having average of less than 1 trade per day of Face Value of Rs. 5 crs. or more in the previous calendar quarter) - 2 times their respective 3-day VaR numbers In addition to values arrived at based on 3 day VaR as above, 0% will continue to get added to cover accrued interest for the period between the day of trade and the day of final settlement after a possible default. 3. An analysis of the effectiveness of the suggested process, based on the trade data for August 04 to Dec 05 is enclosed as Annexure II. Risk Management Department, CCIL 1 20 th Feb 06

4. Members are requested to go through the same and provide their feedback by 5th March 06. Based on the feedback, CCIL will take a decision in regard to implementation of the same. 5. Feedbacks may please be directed to rmd@ccilindia.co.in. In case, any further clarification is required, the same may be had from Mr. V Swamynathan, Manager (Risk Management) at 56639327 or Mr. Siddhartha Roy, Sr. Vice President (Risk Management) at 56630321. ****** ****** Encls Risk Management Department, CCIL 2 20 th Feb 06

Annexure I Methodology to be followed for arriving at Uniform Yield Spread for valuation of State Govt. Securities All trades in State Government securities of face value of Rs. 5 crore or above will be taken into consideration. Apparent outliers will be excluded All trades for a month will be considered for arriving at the Uniform Yield Spread. Model prices for the traded securities will be first arrived at using Sovereign ZCYC rates. An optimization process will then be run to arrive at an Uniform Yield Spread over the respective zero rates across the Sovereign ZCYC curve which will allow minimizing the differences between the traded prices and the model prices (i.e. the price arrived at using the ZCYC of the day of trade and after applying the uniform spread as above), in 95% of the cases. The Yield Spread so arrived at will be notified to the members and would be brought into use on the day following the date of notification. The Yield Spreads will be reviewed at the end of each month (latest by 7 days from the end of the month) and will be used for valuation during the immediately following month. A back-testing of the effectiveness of using the yield spread will be run on a daily basis and summarized results will be made available to the members. This will show the extent of reduction achieved by using the Uniform Yield Spread in reducing the differences between the Traded Prices and Model Prices based on Sovereign ZCYC. In case of any sudden change in the market causing the spreads to change significantly (say by at least 5 basis point), if revealed through daily back-testing, CCIL may change the Yield Spread to be used for a month after duly notifying the members about such change. ****** ****** Risk Management Department, CCIL 3 20 th Feb 06

ANNEXURE II BACK TESTING RESULTS FROM AUGUST 2004 To DECEMBER 2005 USING UNIFORM YIELD SPREAD July '04 Trades 0.397450461 Correction in Model Price For August '04 >0 <=1; - - - - 2 2 - - >1<=3; - - - - 2 8 2 - >3<=5; - - - - - 10 11 9 >5<=7; - - - - - 7 3 1 >7<=10; 3 3 1 1 3 6 5 - >10<=15; 1 - - - 1 2 - - Percentages 4.82% 3.61% 1.20% 1.20% 9.64% 42.17% 25.30% 12.05% Trades** 83 Price: 90.36% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 79.52% Aug '04 Trades 0.45431861 Correction in Model Price For September '04 >0 <=1; - - - - 1 8 - - >1<=3; - - - - 1 48 - - >3<=5; - - - - - 72 15 1 >5<=7; - - - 1 4 34 14 10 >7<=10; - 4 1 2 2 7 6 5 >10<=15; - - - - - - - - Percentages 0.00% 1.69% 0.42% 1.27% 3.39% 71.61% 14.83% 6.78% Trades** 236 Price: 97.88% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 93.22% Risk Management Department, CCIL 4 20 th Feb 06

Sept '04 Trades 0.608887359 Correction in Model Price For October '04 [Ratio of (Adj MP-WAP-WAP) / (MP-WAP)] >1<=3; - - - - - 1 - - >3<=5; - - - - 2 14 - - >5<=7; - - - - - 17 22 1 >7<=10; - 1 1 1-2 20 5 >10<=15; - 1 1 - - - - 1 Percentages 0.00% 2.22% 2.22% 1.11% 2.22% 37.78% 46.67% 7.78% Trades** 90 Price: 95.56% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 92.22% Oct '04 Trades 0.753182748 Correction in Model Price For November '04 >0 <=1; - - - - 2 - - - >1<=3; - - - - 5 14 1 - >3<=5; - - - - - 27 16 1 >5<=7; - - - - - 2 12 33 >7<=10; - - - 1 - - 1 1 >10<=15; 6 - - 5 - - - - Percentages 4.72% 0.00% 0.00% 4.72% 5.51% 33.86% 23.62% 27.56% Trades** 127 Price: 95.28% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 85.04% Risk Management Department, CCIL 5 20 th Feb 06

Nov '04 Trades 0.790241469 Correction in Model Price For December '04 >1<=3; - - - - - 4 16 24 >3<=5; - - - - - 2 35 20 >5<=7; - - - - 1 26 38 28 >7<=10; - - 2 11 7 4 4 1 >10<=15; - - 4 4 3 1 - - Percentages 0.00% 0.00% 2.55% 6.38% 4.68% 15.74% 39.57% 31.06% Trades** 235 Price: 97.45% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 86.38% Dec '04 Trades 0.632314701 Correction in Model Price For January '05 >1<=3; - - - - - - 4 7 >3<=5; - - - - - - 2 2 >5<=7; - - 1 1-5 17 12 >7<=10; 4-2 11 8 5 10 - >10<=15; 1-3 5 - - - - Percentages 5.00% 0.00% 6.00% 17.00% 8.00% 10.00% 33.00% 21.00% Trades** 100 Price: 89.00% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 64.00% Jan '05 Trades 0.441336927 Correction in Model Price For February '05 >1<=3; - - - - - - 5 - >3<=5; - - - - - 2 - - >5<=7; - - - - - 13 28 - >7<=10; - - - 1 1-2 5 >10<=15; - - - - 1 8 - - Risk Management Department, CCIL 6 20 th Feb 06

Percentages 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.52% 3.03% 34.85% 53.03% 7.58% Trades** 66 Price: 100.00% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 95.45% Feb'05 Trades 0.471801886 Correction in Model Price For March '05 >1<=3; - - - - - 1 - - >3<=5; - 1 - - - 2 2 2 >5<=7; - - - - - 3 7 2 >7<=10; 7 - - 2-4 6 13 >10<=15; - 1 6 7 3 3-1 Percentages 9.59% 2.74% 8.22% 12.33% 4.11% 17.81% 20.55% 24.66% Trades** 73 Price: 79.45% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 63.01% Mar '05 Trades 0.329031921 Correction in Model Price For April '05 >3<=5; - - - - - - - - >5<=7; - - - 1-1 4 4 >7<=10; 1 - - - - 2 5 - >10<=15; 4 - - - - - - - Percentages 22.73% 0.00% 0.00% 4.55% 0.00% 13.64% 40.91% 18.18% Trades** 22 Price: 77.27% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 72.73% Risk Management Department, CCIL 7 20 th Feb 06

Apr '05 Trades 0.24701656 Correction in Model Price For May '05 >3<=5; 1 - - - 2 3 - - >5<=7; - - - - 5 6 3 9 >7<=10; - - - - - 1 2 2 >10<=15; 1 - - - 14 61 - - Percentages 1.82% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 19.09% 64.55% 4.55% 10.00% Trades** 110 Price: 98.18% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 79.09% May '05 Trades 0.42384738 Correction in Model Price For June '05 >1<=3; - - - - - 1 1 - >3<=5; - - - - - 20 7 4 >5<=7; - - - - - 12 25 11 >7<=10; - - - - 7 21 16 27 >10<=15; - - - 1 2 2 - - Percentages 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.64% 5.73% 35.67% 31.21% 26.75% Trades** 157 Price: 100.00% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 93.63% June '05 Trades 0.413715105 Correction in Model Price For July '05 >3<=5; - - - - - - 18 - >5<=7; - - 1 2 - - - - >7<=10; - 2 16 5 5 1 4 - >10<=15; 1 - - - - - - - Risk Management Department, CCIL 8 20 th Feb 06

Percentages 1.82% 3.64% 30.91% 12.73% 9.09% 1.82% 40.00% 0.00% Trades** 55 Price: 63.64% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 41.82% July '05 Trades 0.265363947 Correction in Model Price For Aug '05 >1<=3; - - - - 1 4 1 2 >3<=5; 1 - - - 1 10 4 3 >5<=7; - - - - - 3 3 2 >7<=10; - 1 3 4 9 7 18 12 >10<=15; - - - - - 1 - - Percentages 1.11% 1.11% 3.33% 4.44% 12.22% 27.78% 28.89% 21.11% Trades** 90 Price: 94.44% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 77.78% Aug '05 Trades 0.248939246 Correction in Model Price For Sept '05 >1<=3; - - - - 4 6 - - >3<=5; - - - - - 22 15 5 >5<=7; - - - 2 3 11 8 - >7<=10; - - - - - 5 10 4 >10<=15; - - - - - 11 8 16 Percentages 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.54% 5.38% 42.31% 31.54% 19.23% Trades** 130 Price: 100.00% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 93.08% Risk Management Department, CCIL 9 20 th Feb 06

Sept '05 Trades 0.276104283 Correction in Model Price For Oct '05 >3<=5; - - - - - - - - >5<=7; - - - 3 3 6-1 >7<=10; - - - 2 3 20 25 3 >10<=15; - - - - - - - - Percentages 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 7.58% 9.09% 39.39% 37.88% 6.06% Trades** 66 Price: 100.00% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 83.33% Oct '05 Trades 0.215579523 Correction in Model Price For Nov '05 >3<=5; - - - - 4 7 3 - >5<=7; - - - - - 2 8 7 >7<=10; - - - 2 2 9 20 10 >10<=15; - - - - - - - - Percentages 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 2.70% 8.11% 24.32% 41.89% 22.97% Trades** 74 Price: 100.00% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 89.19% Dec '05 Trades 0.195842735 Correction in Model Price For Dec '05 >3<=5; - - - - 1 16 - - >5<=7; - - - - - 12 5 - >7<=10; - 1-3 3 14 16 9 >10<=15; - - - 1 - - - - Risk Management Department, CCIL 10 20 th Feb 06

Percentages 0.00% 1.23% 0.00% 4.94% 4.94% 51.85% 25.93% 11.11% Trades** 81 Price: 98.77% 2) At least 50% reduction achieved 88.89% Risk Management Department, CCIL 11 20 th Feb 06