City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

Similar documents
City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

Sacramento Public Library Authority

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

Contract Review City Council

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

Sacramento Public Library Authority

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

Public Works and Development Services

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN METRO AND WASHINGTON COUNTY FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR PLAN

REPORT TO THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

STAFF REPORT Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) Scenario Performance Update for Board Direction

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

Draft West Los Angeles Transportation Improvement and Mitigation Specific Plan

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO PREPARE

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

SB 83 Additional Vehicle Registration Fee Expenditure Plan (July 15, 2010)

ORDINANCE NO

FY 2017 Rural Transportation Planning Work Program SCOPE OF WORK

Chapter 6. Transportation Planning and Programming. Chapter 6

City of Portsmouth Portsmouth, New Hampshire Department of Public Works

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT:

TABLE 1 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAM Measure B Revenues and Expenditures

ACTION ELEMENT CONCLUSIONS

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. June 10, 2014

Re: Proposed Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) Guidelines, FY

Budget and Audit Committee Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

1. I N T R O D U C T I O N

3/11/2015 Item #2 Page 1

Case No.: N/A Staff Phone #: (805) Environmental Document: N/A 1.0 REQUEST

STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REPORT Quarterly Strategic Plan Outcomes and Project Updates Q1 FY 2018

CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND. Update of Previous Planning Work. Plan Development Process. Public Involvement and Review Process

JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM AMENDMENT 1 FISCAL YEAR 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Draft SFMTA Strategic Plan 11/14/2011, San Francisco California

RFP ADDENDUM # 1 CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 455 NORTH REXFORD DRIVE BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210

Cancelled. Final Action

FY and FY Draft Budget Operations Committee January 24, 2017

Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: Concept, process, content & benefits. Koprivnica 11 th of June 2015

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

TIGER IV. Benefit Cost Analysis. Minot International Airport Access Road. Minot, ND

Branch Transportation Planning

CITY OF WORTHINGTON REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS QUALIFICATIONS STRATEGIC BICYCLING AND WALKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Transportation Trust Fund Overview

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

SFMTA Board Presentation January 16, 2018

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

Oversight Board for Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency (RASA)

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO PREPARE A GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN

Transportation Authority of Marin: 2018 Transportation Revenue Measure Feasibility Survey

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Project Analysis... A-1 Project Summary Background Issues Conclusion. Findings... F-1 CEQA Findings Charter Findings

Sec Transportation management special use permits Purpose and intent.

OHIO MPO AND LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2015 SUMMARY

AGENDA REPORT. DATE: November 27, City Commission. Kim D. Leinbach, Interim City Manager

Downtown Syracuse Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Study. Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

July 12, Request for Proposals. for

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. May 12, 2011

A. Approve updated Measure R Early Action Project list (Attachment A) ; and

Transcription:

Meeting Date: 2/4/2014 Report Type: Consent Report ID: 2014-00008 09 City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor www.cityofsacramento.org Title: Appropriate Funds and Execute Agreement: Downtown Sacramento Transportation Study (T15131700) Location: Districts 3 and 4 Issue: A Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued for feasibility studies of transportation projects within the downtown City of Sacramento area bounded by Broadway, the Sacramento River, the American River, and Alhambra Boulevard. Appropriation of funds and Council approval of the agreement is necessary to conduct this study. Recommendation: Pass a Resolution 1) appropriating $300,000 in federal funds (Fund 3703) to the Downtown Transportation Study Project (T15131700); 2) appropriating $40,000 in Transportation System Management Funds (Fund 2012) to the Downtown Transportation Study Project (T15131700); 3) authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with DKS for an amount not to exceed $791,246; and 4) cancelling the 3rd Street Extension Project Capital Improvement Project (T15135200). Contact: Fedolia "Sparky" Harris, Senior Planner, (916) 808-2996; Hector Barron, City Traffic Engineer, (916) 808-2669, Department of Public Works Presenter: None Department: Public Works Department Division: Transportation Division Dept ID: 15001911 Attachments: 1-Description/Analysis 2-Resolution 3-Exhibit A (DKS Associates Downtown Transportation Study) City Attorney Review City Treasurer Review Approved as to Form Gerald Hicks 1/27/2014 4:26:41 PM Approvals/Acknowledgements Reviewed for Impact on Cash and Debt Russell Fehr 1/22/2014 11:15:11 AM Department Director or Designee: Jerry Way - 1/23/2014 7:14:07 AM James Sanchez, City Attorney Shirley Concolino, City Clerk Russell Fehr, City Treasurer 1 of 108 John F. Shirey, City Manager

Description/Analysis Issue: On October 27, 2009, the City Council authorized staff to apply for $1,000,000 in Regional/Local Grant funding for the Downtown Sacramento Transportation Study. The City of Sacramento was notified of the grant award in 2010. In February of 2013, the staff released a Request for Proposals (RFP) to provide feasibility studies for evaluation of costs, public outreach, and prioritization of projects within the downtown City of Sacramento area bounded by Broadway, the Sacramento River, the American River, and Alhambra Boulevard. Appropriation of funds and Council approval of an agreement is necessary to conduct this study. Cancellation of the 3 rd Street Roadway Extension Project is necessary as the Downtown Transportation Study will determine the alignment and priority for this and other improvements. Policy Considerations: The following Sacramento 2030 General Plan policies support the analysis proposed to be completed by the recommendation: M 1.1.1 Right-of-Ways - The City shall manage the use of transportation rightof-ways by all travel modes, consistent with the goal to provide Complete Streets, as described in Goal M 4.2. M 1.2.1 Multimodal Choices - The City shall promote development of an integrated, multi-modal transportation system that offers attractive choices among modes including pedestrian-ways, public transportation, roadways, bikeways, rail, waterways, and aviation, and reduces air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. M 2.1.4 Cohesive Network - The City shall develop a cohesive pedestrian network of public sidewalks and street crossings that makes walking a convenient and safe way to travel. M 2.1.12 Safe Sidewalks - The City shall develop safe and convenient pedestrian-ways that are universally accessible, adequately illuminated, and properly designed to reduce conflicts between motor vehicles and pedestrians. M 3.1.1 Transit for All - The City shall support a well-designed transit system that meets the transportation needs of Sacramento residents and visitors including seniors, those with disabilities, and transit-dependent persons. The City shall enhance bicycle and pedestrian access to stations. M 4.1.2 Balancing Community Impacts with Economic Development Goals - The City shall evaluate and strive to balance impacts to the community and the environment with economic development goals when adding or modifying roads and bridges. 2 of 108

M 4.2.5 Multi-Modal Corridors - The City shall designate multi-modal corridors in the Central City, within and between urban centers, along major transit lines, and/or along commercial corridors to receive increased investment for transit, bikeway, and pedestrian-way improvements. The action requested is also consistent with the City s Strategic Plan goal to make Sacramento a safer place for residents, businesses and visitors. Economic Impact: None. Environmental Considerations: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The award of a professional services agreement is not subject to CEQA review. It is anticipated that future projects identified in this study may be implemented using federal transportation funds. As such, federal guidelines for the development of the purpose and needs statement will be followed. Future projects will be subject to environmental evaluation under CEQA guidelines and possibly National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements. Sustainability Considerations: The recommended action supports the Climate Action Plan goal to create a connected multi-modal transportation network that increases the use of sustainable modes of transportation (e.g., walking, biking, and transit) and reduces dependence on automobiles. Other: None. Committee/Commission Action: None. Rationale for Recommendation: A pre-proposal meeting was held on February 26, 2013 and proposals were due March 20, 2013. One consultant team, led by DKS Associates, was deemed responsive to the RFP. A selection committee comprised of staff from the Department of Public Works, the Economic Development Department, the Community Development Department, and Regional Transit reviewed the proposal. Interviews were waived based upon the number of proposals. DKS was chosen as the preferred firm and a certified letter of decision was sent to the respondent on April 5, 2013. Scope negotiations followed to the mutual satisfaction of both parties with unsubstantial effect (<0.01%) on the proposed budget. The study to be performed by DKS will include: Stakeholder engagement and public outreach Visioning Expert panel (optional) 3 of 108

Network alternatives Travel demand forecasts Multi-modal analysis Economic development screening of system packages and gateway projects Engineering and cost estimates Screening process Preferred complete streets network Prioritization Finance plan Final report Additional data compilation and collection (optional) The study is expected to be completed in 14 months, starting in March of 2014. On September 18, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution 2012-330, which established the 3 rd Street Extension Project (T15135200). The Downtown Transportation Study will identify multiple options for circulation in the Downtown area; hence the 3 rd Street Extension Project will be cancelled pending determination of the needed projects and priorities resulting from the study. Financial Considerations: The preparation of the study is estimated to cost $1,240,000. The project will be funded with federal funds and local transportation funds which will cover the required local match and federally ineligible expenses. A total of $900,000 has already been appropriated to the Downtown Transportation Study (S15131700) though previous actions. Appropriation of an additional $300,000 in federal funds (Fund 3703) and $40,000 in local funds (Fund 2012) will bring the total budget to $1,240,000 which is sufficient to execute the agreement with DKS for an amount not to exceed $791,246 and cover staff and project management expenses. There are no General Funds planned or allocated for this project. Local Business Enterprise (LBE) Preference Program: This is a federal project; therefore, the LBE program does not apply and is held in abeyance. The Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal for this project was set at 15%. The preferred consultant team led by DKS includes three DBE-certified firms that will account for 18.2% of the total project expenditures. 4 of 108

RESOLUTION NO. Adopted by the Sacramento City Council APPROPRIATE FUNDS, APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DKS ASSOCIATES FOR THE DOWNTOWN SACRAMENTO TRANSPORTATION STUDY (S15131700), AND CANCEL 3 RD STREET EXTENSION PROJECT BACKGROUND A. On October 27, 2009, the City Council authorized staff to apply for $1,000,000 in Regional/Local Grant funding for the Downtown Sacramento Transportation Study. The City of Sacramento was notified of the grant award in 2010. B. In February of 2013, staff released a Request for Proposals (RFP) to provide feasibility studies for evaluation of costs, public outreach, and prioritization of projects within the downtown City of Sacramento area bounded by Broadway, the Sacramento River, the American River, and Alhambra Boulevard. C. The Downtown Sacramento Transportation Study is a federal project; therefore, the Local Business Enterprise Preference Program does not apply and is held in abeyance. D. The Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal for this project was set at 15%. E. One consultant team, led by DKS Associates, was deemed responsive to the RFP. F. A selection committee comprised of staff from the Department of Public Works, the Economic Development Department, the Community Development Department, and Regional Transit reviewed the proposal. G. Interviews were waived based upon the single proposal received. H. DKS was chosen as the preferred firm and a certified letter of decision was sent to the respondent on April 5, 2013. I. The proposal submitted by the DKS team included a DBE participation rate of 18.2%. 5 of 108

J. On September 18, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution 2012-330, establishing the 3 rd Street Extension Project (T15135200). The alignment and priority for this extension will be determined based on the outcome of the Downtown Transportation Study. BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The FY2013/14 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is amended by appropriating $300,000 (Fund 3703) in federal funds to the Downtown Transportation Study Project (T15131700). Section 2. The FY2013/14 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is amended by appropriating $40,000 (Fund 2012) in Transportation System Management funds to the Downtown Transportation Study Project (T15131700). Section 3. The City Manager is authorized to execute a professional services agreement with DKS Associates for the Downtown Transportation Study Project (S15131700) in an amount not to exceed $791,246. Section 4. The 3 rd Street Extension Project (T15135200) is cancelled. 6 of 108

7 of 108

8 of 108

9 of 108

10 of 108

11 of 108

12 of 108

13 of 108

14 of 108

15 of 108

16 of 108

17 of 108

18 of 108

19 of 108

20 of 108

21 of 108

22 of 108

23 of 108

24 of 108

25 of 108

26 of 108

27 of 108

28 of 108

29 of 108

30 of 108

31 of 108

32 of 108

33 of 108

34 of 108

35 of 108

36 of 108

37 of 108

38 of 108

39 of 108

40 of 108

41 of 108

42 of 108

43 of 108

44 of 108

45 of 108

46 of 108

47 of 108

48 of 108

49 of 108

50 of 108

51 of 108

52 of 108

53 of 108

54 of 108

55 of 108

56 of 108

57 of 108

58 of 108

59 of 108

60 of 108

61 of 108

62 of 108

63 of 108

64 of 108

65 of 108

66 of 108

67 of 108

68 of 108

69 of 108

70 of 108

71 of 108

72 of 108

73 of 108

74 of 108

75 of 108

76 of 108

77 of 108

78 of 108

79 of 108

80 of 108

81 of 108

82 of 108

83 of 108

84 of 108

85 of 108

86 of 108

87 of 108

88 of 108

89 of 108

90 of 108

91 of 108

92 of 108

93 of 108

94 of 108

95 of 108

96 of 108

97 of 108

98 of 108

99 of 108

100 of 108

101 of 108

102 of 108

103 of 108

104 of 108

105 of 108

106 of 108

107 of 108

108 of 108