EDUCATION FUNDING PART III OF SERIES

Similar documents
School Referendum Results School Amount Type of Debt Description Arrowhead UHS Failed

School District of Green Lake

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BENTON

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LADYSMITH BUDGET HEARING & ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 18, 2017

WAUNAKEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2015 ANNUAL MEETING & BUDGET HEARING

Richland School District

Phil Frei Director of Business & Finance July 22, 2014

Stoughton Area School District Budget Report

State of the District

School District of Milton Board of Education

Referenda. General Thomasboro School District 130. State of Illinois. Proposition to Increase the Limiting Rate

Understanding the K-12 General Education Funding Program

Montville Township Public Schools

SPOONER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET PRESENTATION

MMSD Current Working. Baird Budget Forecast Model TAX LEVY SUMMARY. Levy and Misc. Copyright Robert W. Baird & Co. 7/7/2016

COUNCIL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT

DISTRICT HISTORY Referendum ($585,000) Purchase of 10 Acres / Football Field Original junior high building (present old section of MS)

Oak Park School District 97, Cook County, IL

Wisconsin Budget Toolkit

Caldwell-West Caldwell School District School Budget PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 28, 2014

Key Considerations for Referendum Planning

About the Wisconsin Policy Forum. Preface and Acknowledgments


Property Tax Relief Frequently Asked Questions Act 72 of 2004: The Homeowner Tax Relief Act

Presented to the Village of Caledonia June 2008 Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance, 401 North Lawn Avenue, Madison Wisconsin

Village of Spring Grove

NORTH ROSE-WOLCOTT CAPITAL PROJECT MAY 15, 2018

River Forest Community School Corporation. Forging Ingots Together

Options for a Future Capital Program

Great Start January 11, 2017 Patty Heminover Springsted Incorporated

FINANCIAL REPORT NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED FOR EXCELLENCE

Trends in Fund Balance, Special Education Costs, Staffing & Class Sizes

BUDGET BRIEF: State of Wisconsin Governor s Budget

Budget & Proposed 2019 Property Taxes

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

School Budget Newsletter

HARTLAND-LAKESIDE JT. #3 SCHOOL DISTRICT

Frequently asked questions on the Ridgewood Public School Budget. 2. Why does the Board approve a preliminary budget?

Fiscal Year GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING THE BUDGET CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT #5 ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO

The Cost to School Districts Due to Wisconsin s Prevailing Wage Law

SCHOOL BUDGET NEWS. Elmira City School District. May School District Annual Budget Vote and School Board Election May 17, 2016

BUDGET MESSAGE. June 15, 2017

Your Referendum Passed! Now What? A presentation for WiRSA Rural Schools Matter Conference

Fall Budget Adoption and Tax Levy Certification

KIMBERLY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

CHAPTER 3 PROPOSITION 2½ AGENDA AND OBJECTIVES

Nicolet High School District 2011 Referendum Frequently Asked Questions March 8, 2011

SPOTLIGHT FORSYTH COUNTY BOND REFERENDA. Three bonds totaling $430 million. Taxpayers should get the facts. CITY AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT #481

PROPOSITION FARMINGTON SCHOOLS. April 8, 2014 Bond Issue

BROOKLYN CENTER SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING FOR TAXES PAYABLE December 14, 2015 Presented by: Sara Bratsch Finance Director

Sheboygan Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2016

SCHOOL. #112 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION ISSUE School construction finance for school units

Fullerton Joint Union High School District. Definitions of Districts Funds

SPECIAL TOWN MEETING ARTICLES BENEFITTING THE LEXINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS... 2 ARTICLE 2 APPROPRIATE FOR MIDDLE SCHOOLS ADDITIONS AND REMODELING...

Chatham Central School District

Port News VOTE. Polling Locations. Tuesday, May 17. Where do I vote? POLLS OPEN 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. Voter Information Questions?

Budget Workshop #3

The School District of Lodi. Budget Hearing and Annual Meeting Report

NORTH SYRACUSE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT. Fund Balance & Budget Assumptions December 4, 2017

Interest Earned through 6/30/2018 2,013, , ,029, ,454, (3,443,911.91) 29, ,500, ,540,322.

10/16/2017 OCTOBER 17, 2017

OVERVIEW MINNESOTA PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM AND SCHOOL DISTRICT LEVY PROCESS Payable 2008 Levy

Annual Meeting & Budget. Hearing. School District of Bayfield. Home of the Bayfield Trollers! October 16, Tel Fax

Financing Education In Minnesota A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department

North Babylon U.F.S.D Budget Adoption. April 20, 2017

Measuring the Impact of Act 1 in Allegheny County

Proposition E: Escondido Union School District $182.1 Million Bond Measure

Funding & Budgeting Overview May 2, 2012 Seminole County Public Schools

Fort Lee School District

Rockford Area Schools

West Bend School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

RESOLUTION 16/17-4 A RESOLUTION OF GREATER ALBANY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.

School Finance 101 & Bonds 101 CHRISTOPHER J. SMITH CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER APRIL 4, 2017

Public Safety/Crime Prevention Sales Tax Proposal

Elba Central School District Budget Hearing. May 7, :30 p.m.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 H 1 HOUSE BILL 274. Short Title: Taxpayer Bill of Rights. (Public)

Garden City Public Schools. Question of the Week:

October. November. December-February. February-April. April. May. Administrators begin budget discussion.

Preliminary Budget Report

Adopted Budget. Fiscal Year School District 27J E. 160th Avenue Brighton, CO School District 27J. Every Child, Every Day

Two Ballot Proposals. August 8, 2017

Mesa County Elections

Oak Park and River Forest High School Five-Year Facilities Plan and Referendum Overview and Frequently Asked Questions

Colorado Economy and State Budget Outlook

Public School Finance 101

Contents Capital and Debt

Life Insurance Companies Portfolio Summary Overview

Major State Aids &Taxes DATA ON WHERE THE AIDS GO AND WHERE THE TAXES COME FROM

South Orange-Maplewood School District. January 30, 2017

Community Budget Forum

A Guide to the Scarsdale Schools Budget

Portland Community College

Michigan s Experience With School Reform

School Board Adopts $29,809,355 Budget 1.62% Tax Levy B U D G E T. Protecting our Investment, Preparing for our Future

Bond Election is called by the Board of Trustees Bonds are authorized by the voters Bonds are sold

CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF FRIDLEY SEPTEMBER 26, Councilmember Barnette Councilmember Saefke Councilmember Varichak Councilmember Bolkcom

EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE FUND

Proposition 2½ Ballot Questions Requirements and Procedures

Williamsville Central School District Long-Range Financial Plan and Reserve Plan Report

Truth-in-Taxation Instructions for Payable 2019

Transcription:

Friday, July 20, 2018 EDUCATION FUNDING PART III OF SERIES Referendums In Wisconsin, current law limits the annual amount of revenue each school district can raise, this is called the Revenue Limit or Revenue Cap. What a school can spend on education for a year is a set limit, comprised of two factors, the state aid and the levy amounts (the amount the schools tax locally). If the state provides more state aid, the amount the locals can tax reduces to keep them under the revenue limit or cap. If the state provides less aid, the amount the schools can tax locally goes up. If a school wants to spend more money than what is allowed under their revenue cap they must go the local property tax owners and ask for permission to increase local taxes. For the purposes of this report, we will only discuss three types of referendum questions questions to issue debt, questions to increase the revenue cap for a certain amount of time (non-recurring), and questions to increase the revenue cap on an on-going basis (recurring). A referendum is an individual question, asking the voters if they will approve or disapprove the school district spending money beyond their revenue cap or to issue debt. While many people think of a referendum as an event, it is actually the individual question. The passing of 2017 Act 59 (the biennial budget) means that as of January 1, 2018, a school district can only hold two referendum questions in one calendar year to be held on regularly scheduled spring and fall election days, with the exception of districts who have faced a natural disaster. In the case of a natural disaster, a district may have a special referendum within the six months following the disaster but no sooner than 70 days after the adoption of the resolution. Schools hold referendum usually for two reasons, to exceed the revenue limit to maintain programs and staffing, or to issue debt, generally used for building or material needs like computers or equipment. From 1999 through July 1, 2018, Wisconsin residents approved $9.7 billion in referendum questions. Most of those funds are issue debt by school districts. The average amount of money asked for in a referendum question, except for recurring referendum questions, has increased, with a spike in 2016. Type of Referendum # of Each Type Passed $ Amount Approved Issue Debt 622 $7,678,082,298 Recurring 172 $179,811,594 Non-recurring 430 $1,849,018,362 Total approved by taxpayers 1,224 $9,706,912,254 A referendum may be held by a school district to exceed its revenue limit. The school board must approve of the resolution supporting inclusion of an amount in the school district budget that will exceed the revenue limit of the district (via Legislative Fiscal Bureau). A referendum may be recurring or non-recurring. If a recurring referendum is passed, then the revenue limit for the district will increase by that amount in the following year. If a non-recurring referendum is passed, the revenue limit is not increased the following year. In order to hold a referendum, a school district must follow a series of guidelines set by the Wisconsin Statutes. To have a referendum on the spring or fall ballot to incur debt, a school board must adopt a resolution no less than 70 days before the election. They must publish the adoption of the resolution within 10 days of adoption and notify DPI about the resolution. For a resolution to be on the fall ballot, the resolution must be adopted and posted by about Labor Day, and to be on the spring ballot, it must be adopted and posted by about the end of January.

Calendar Year Administration # Total Referenda Issue Debt Non- Recurring Recurring Passed Failed Percentage Passed 2018 Walker (To date) 71 38 26 7 60 11 84.5 2017 Walker 83 40 29 14 52 31 62.7 2016 Walker 154 83 47 24 122 32 79.2 2015 Walker 90 46 40 4 62 28 68.9 2014 Walker 119 51 53 15 80 38 67.2 2013 Walker 69 36 29 4 42 27 60.9 2012 Walker 79 43 29 7 53 24 67.1 2011 Walker 70 33 32 5 39 31 55.7 2010 Doyle 92 44 37 10 48 43 52.2 2009 Doyle 75 27 35 13 34 41 45.3 2008 Doyle 139 59 52 28 70 67 50.4 2007 Doyle 117 56 38 22 60 56 51.3 2006 Doyle 136 66 53 21 82 54 60.3 2005 Doyle 96 41 31 23 42 52 43.8 2004 Doyle 97 49 25 26 58 39 59.8 2003 Doyle 106 57 21 28 26 80 24.5 2002 McCallum 104 59 24 21 37 66 35.5 2001 McCallum 167 83 29 53 71 94 42.5 2000 Thompson 192 110 33 49 108 84 56.2 1999 Thompson 167 103 28 36 78 89 46.4 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Referendum Spending Over Past 19 Years 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 # Total Referenda Ref Issue Debt Ref Non-Recurring Ref Recurring Passed Failed The percentage of referendums (all types) passed is going up, particularly for issue debt. The percentage of overall referendums passed in 2018 (up to July 1, 2018) is at 85%, with recent years having 60-80% of all referendums passed. In comparison, the early 2000s had a passing rate of 25-60%. Recurring and non-recurring referendums have been presented at a steady rate, not increasing or decreasing dramatically, and have been passing at a steady increase. The Walker Administration has seen more referendums passed than any other administration over 20 years.

Issue Debt Referendum Year Sum of All Average of All # of Referendum Number Passed 2018 $596,760,000 $15,704,211 $10,625,000 38 31 2017 $909,630,000 $22,740,750 $11,967,500 40 23 2016 $1,893,958,000 $22,818,771 $12,500,000 83 64 2015 $612,720,000 $13,320,000 $9,075,000 46 27 2014 $962,245,000 $18,867,549 $16,000,000 51 33 2013 $488,773,881 $13,577,052 $10,157,500 36 20 2012 $502,070,000 $11,676,047 $6,200,000 43 30 2011 $432,035,000 $13,091,970 $4,900,000 33 13 2010 $373,783,000 $8,495,068 $5,852,500 44 27 2009 $357,164,225 $13,228,305 $9,325,000 27 13 2008 $825,403,000 $13,989,881 $6,500,000 59 30 2007 $1,025,127,000 $18,305,839 $9,350,000 56 31 2006 $709,625,566 $11,445,574 $5,950,000 62 40 2005 $554,641,437 $13,527,840 $11,250,000 41 16 2004 $505,873,000 $10,323,939 $4,700,000 49 32 2003 $638,390,000 $11,199,825 $5,850,000 57 13 2002 $458,714,000 $7,774,814 $4,900,000 59 24 2001 $733,667,400 $8,839,366 $6,450,000 83 35 2000 $1,056,497,537 $9,604,523 $3,945,000 110 65 1999 $998,344,709 $9,692,667 $4,800,000 103 55 Sum of All $2,000,000,000 $1,800,000,000 $1,600,000,000 $1,400,000,000 $1,200,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $800,000,000 $600,000,000 $400,000,000 $200,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $5,000,000 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 Average of All While the total amount of issue debt referendums, along with recurring and non-recurring referendums, being held each year is seeming to be on a downward trend, the amount of money per referendum is tending to increase. Districts are asking for more money less often. It is likely that districts would hold referendums more often if they could. The highest amount from an issue debt referendum was from Verona Area in April 2017 to construct a new high school and auditorium, renovate and reconfigure the current Verona Area High School and Badger Ridge Middle School, district-wide capital and building infrastructure improvements and repairs and related furnishings, fixtures and equipment. They had asked for $162,760,000.00. The least asked for in an issue debt referendum was in 2006 by Tigerton to fund roof repairs on the elementary school and buy a new school bus.

Recurring Referendum Year Sum Average Median # Recurring Referendum 2018 $6,250,000.00 $892,857.14 $500,000 7 5 2017 $17,983,583.00 $1,284,613.07 $750,000 14 8 2016 $60,504,000.00 $2,521,000.00 $1,480,000 24 20 2015 $2,303,500.00 $575,875.00 $467,500 4 4 2014 $21,640,864.00 $1,442,724.27 $500,000 15 8 2013 $1,120,000.00 $373,333.33 $370,000 4 1 2012 $6,252,000.00 $1,042,000.00 $863,500 7 4 2011 $1,935,000.00 $483,750.00 $287,500 5 4 2010 $17,395,000.00 $1,739,500.00 $1,000,000 10 2 2009 $22,393,000.00 $1,722,438.46 $610,000 13 3 2008 $10,396,205.00 $611,541.47 $525,000 28 10 2007 $19,389,446.00 $881,338.45 $750,000 22 9 2006 $23,110,992.00 $1,110,523.43 $750,000 21 10 2005 $36,957,000.00 $1,539,875.00 $700,000 23 10 2004 $11,991,358.00 $521,363.39 $350,000 26 10 2003 $15,862,764.00 $566,527.29 $330,500 28 5 2002 $6,717,000.00 $319,857.14 $285,000 21 2 2001 $30,602,370.00 $566,710.56 $375,000 53 20 2000 $21,953,873.00 $447,997.41 $325,000 49 26 Passed $18,000,000 $25,000,000 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $2,000,000 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 Average of All In 2016, the Madison Metropolitan School District asked a recurring referendum for $26 million, the largest recurring debt in the last 20 years. The smallest recurring debt was $19,250.00, asked by Stoughton in 1999. The average amount to be asked for in a recurring referendum has seen an increase, but not necessarily a consistent increase as it has gone down in the last few years. The number of recurring referendum passed has gone up exponentially since 1999.

Non-Recurring Referendum Year Sum of All Average of All # of Number Passed Non-Recurring Referendum 2016 $360,423,000 $7,668,574 $4,500,000 47 38 2015 $104,100,270 $2,602,507 $2,125,000 40 31 2014 $291,806,297 $5,505,779 $2,250,000 53 39 2013 $96,162,615 $3,315,952 $2,400,000 29 21 2012 $74,259,000 $2,560,655 $1,785,000 29 19 2011 $124,652,600 $3,895,394 $1,750,000 32 22 2010 $115,487,207 $3,039,137 $2,575,000 37 19 2009 $101,930,000 $2,912,286 $1,540,000 35 18 2008 $179,270,000 $3,447,500 $1,950,000 52 30 2007 $157,686,763 $4,043,250 $2,475,000 38 20 2006 $172,645,377 $3,257,460 $2,500,000 53 32 2005 $138,282,436 $4,460,724 $2,500,000 31 16 2004 $72,231,000 $2,889,240 $1,500,000 25 16 2003 $59,941,000 $2,854,333 $1,800,000 21 8 2002 $35,977,000 $1,499,042 $875,000 24 11 2001 $67,256,615 $2,241,887 $880,000 29 16 2000 $76,131,215 $2,307,007 $1,350,000 33 17 1999 $81,139,320 $2,897,833 $902,500 28 12 Sum of All $400,000,000 $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 1999200120032005200720092011201320152017 $12,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 1999200120032005200720092011201320152017 Average of All The average and median amount of money asked for in a non-recurring referendum has seen an increase, along with the number or non-recurring referendums passed. In 2017, the Green Bay Area asked for $165,000,000.00 to exceed their revenue limit by $16,500,000 each year for 10 years, in order to approach the state average in educational programming and class sizes and to retain staff. The lowest amount asked for in a non-recurring question was $45,000 by Phelps in 2009 to improve the school fitness facilities. For additional information on school referendums, read the FOCUS by the Wisconsin Policy Forum (formerly the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance). Thank you to DPI and Legislative Fiscal Bureau for their assistance in gathering data and answering questions pertaining to school referendum.