Good people creating a good transportation value for a better quality of life.

Similar documents
Finance & Audit Committee Budget Work Session. September 19, 2018

Debt. Summary of Policy. utilized in, lead and senior manager roles when appropriate

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

Section 1 Introduction and Overview Section 2 Financial Structure, Policy and Process Section 3 Financial Summaries Section 4 Capital and Debt

INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT. Treasury Management R September 11, 2018

Contents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205

DEBT POLICY March 2013

Rural Transportation Forum, Walkerton, ON

Section 1 Introduction and Overview Section 2 Financial Structure, Policy, and Process Section 3 Financial Summaries Section 4 Capital and Debt

2017 RISK ASSESSMENT AND PROGRAM EVALUATION AND AUDIT PLAN

CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION December 31, 2011 and 2010 (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

2017 Educational Series FUNDING

EXHIBIT A. The purpose of this Debt Management Policy is to assist the County in pursuit of the following objectives:

Strengthening Vermont s Economy by Integrating Transportation and Smart Growth Policy

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

TSCC Budget Review TriMet

Intercity Transit Community Update

SECTION I: DEFINITIONS

CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION December 31, 2010 and 2009 (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

CAPITAL TRANSIT MISSION STATEMENT FY13 PROPOSED BUDGET $6,707,900 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CORE SERVICES FUNDING SOURCES FOR CAPITAL TRANSIT

Whatcom Transportation Authority

JUNE 2015 STRATEGIC PLAN

Overview of the Final New Starts / Small Starts Regulation and Frequently Asked Questions

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

HERCULES STRATEGIC PLAN 2017

2017 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROGRESS REPORT

CHAMPAIGN-URBANA MASS TRANSIT DISTRICT Urbana, Illinois FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 AND 2015

Funding Local Public Transportation

~ NOTICE OF MEETING ~ CAPITAL METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING

Draft SFMTA Strategic Plan 11/14/2011, San Francisco California

2040 Plan Update. Land Use Advisory Committee March 16, 2017

New York City Transit Authority Consolidated Financial Statements Management s Discussion and Analysis December 31, 2004 and 2003

CITY OF HAMILTON. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Transportation Division

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND. Update of Previous Planning Work. Plan Development Process. Public Involvement and Review Process

Approval of Proposed FY 2019 Annual Budget and 20-Year Financial Plan

CITY OF PORTERVILLE. Transportation and Transit Funds Audited Financial Statements. Years Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

ACTION STRATEGIES. Aurora Places is the guidebook

SFMTA Board Presentation January 16, 2018

August 31, 2016 Financial Report

SE A T T L E T R A NSPO R T A T I O N B E N E F I T DIST RI C T R ESO L U T I O N 5

Priorities. Vision and Mission Statements

Cincinnati Streetcar: Options & Recommendations for Funding Operations

WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER

Community Planning & Development

Peer Agency: King County Metro

VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION. FY2016 Budget. Sue Minter, Secretary of Transportation House Transportation Committee

CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

PLAN 2040 Transportation Project Selection Process

INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION (A COMPONENT UNIT OF THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS MARION COUNTY GOVERNMENT REPORTING ENTITY)

Overview of State Highway Fund 0006 Revenues and Allocations, the Texas Mobility Fund, and the Texas Rail Relocation and Improvement Fund

Chicago Transit Authority Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 and Supplementary Information and Independent Auditors'

BOARD POLICY NO. 036 SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DEBT POLICY

Transportation Trust Fund Overview

Debt Management Policy

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon 2013 Annual Report

Adopted 2012 Operating and Capital Budgets. December 15, 2011 Board Meeting Resolution Number:

Regional Transportation District FasTracks Financial Plan. April 22,

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 148

An ASO Must Comply with the Requirements of Chapter 172 in Order to be Eligible to Enjoy the Benefits of Chapter 172.

OMAHA-COUNCIL BLUFFS METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING AGENCY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION JUNE 30, 2016

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

FY17 FY16 Valley Metro RPTA Sources of Funds FY17 vs FY16

PA TURNPIKE COMMISSION POLICY

Spokane Transit Authority Adopted 2019 Operating and Capital Budgets. November 15, 2018 Board Meeting Resolution Number:

Public Transportation

May 31, 2016 Financial Report

Chicago Transit Authority Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 and Supplementary Information and Independent Auditors'

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. Financial Summary

CAPITAN MUNICIPAL SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION SECTION D FISCAL MANAGEMENT

1. The City of Boise shall annually adopt a balanced budget where operating revenues are equal to, or exceed, operating expenditures.

Fixed Guideway Transit Overview

Section I Year-to-date revenues collected and projected revenues and expenditures for the current fiscal year

ASSETS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 303, ,236 RESTRICTED ASSETS 116, ,836 PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NET 2,155,514 1,960,410

N A D O N A D O R E S E A R C H F O U N D AT I O N R P O A M E R I C A

Budget Performance in Millions of Dollars Favorable/Unfavorable to Budget. Suburban Suburban

Public Act No

University Link LRT Extension

MACON-BIBB COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY MACON, GEORGIA (A COMPONENT UNIT OF MACON-BIBB COUNTY, GEORGIA)

ZONE 7 WATER AGENCY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Public Transit Services Summary of Submitted 2015 Budget From Rates

CITY OF TEXARKANA, TEXAS

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

Spokane Transit Authority Adopted 2018 Operating and Capital Budgets. December 14, 2017 Board Meeting Resolution Number:

DeKalb Public Library Investment Policy

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Plan Abstract

House Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon 2014 Annual Report

ENERGY MANAGEMENT PLAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT POLICY: ERG-1

Chapter 10 Equity and Environmental Justice

TRANSIT SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AND RENOVATION. VEHICLES - Caltrain

Program Evaluation and Audit COUNTY CONTRACTOR ADA COST REVIEW DARTS AND SCOTT COUNTY

NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY

Terms & Conditions for the provision of Support & Maintenance

2007 Legislative Program Northern Virginia Transportation Authority Approved: November 10, 2006

TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012)

The Transit Authority of the City of Omaha FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT For the years ended December 31, 2014, and 2013

Transcription:

BOARD ENDS POLICIES 1.1.1 Credo 1.1.2 Vision 1.1.3 Mission and Definitions 1.2.1 Safety 1.2.2 Advertising 1.2.3 Effective Administration of Utah Transit Authority 1.2.4 Procurement 1.2.5 Private Enterprise Participation 1.2.6 Debt Service Reserve & Rate Stabilization Fund 1.3.1 Customers with Disabilities 1.3.2 Preservation of Mission & Purpose 1.3.3 Internal Communications & Partnering 1.3.4 Quality Transportation Services 1.3.5 Essential Partners 1.3.6 Leadership & Support 1.3.7 Promoting a Feeling of Community Ownership 1.4.1a Property - Acquisition 1.4.1b Property - Encumbrance 1.4.2 Planning, Design, Funding & Construction of Transportation Infrastructure and Services 1.4.3 Funding

Ends Policy No. 1.1.1 Credo Good people creating a good transportation value for a better quality of life. Effective Date: August 27, 2003 Adopted by: R2003-08-04

Ends Policy No. 1.1.2 Vision Provide an integrated system of innovative, accessible and efficient public transportation services that increase access to opportunities and contribute to a healthy environment for the people of the Wasatch region. Effective Date: April 26, 2006 Adopted by: R2006-04-05 1

Ends Policy No. 1.1.3 Mission and Definitions Utah Transit Authority strengthens and connects communities thereby enabling individuals to pursue a fuller life with greater ease and convenience by leading through partnering, planning, and wise investment of physical, economic, and human resources. Utah Transit Authority strengthens and connects communities means the Authority links communities with transit services consistent with a regional plan; facilitates economic development; encourages development of community facilities and public spaces; enables increased social interactions among citizens; promotes a feeling of ownership of the transit services among members of the community. enabling individuals to pursue a fuller life with ease and convenience means the Authority provides transportation options that are appropriately priced; increases connections and maintains and improves the efficiency of movement at regional, community, and neighborhood levels; promotes walkable communities; expands the freedoms and choices of the region s citizens; increases citizens accessibility to daily destinations; provides environmental benefits to the region and its communities; increases the integration of transit-dependent populations. by leading through partnering means the Authority works to build and maintain bridges with existing partners and identifies potential new partners on a continuous/regular basis; cultivates leadership among partners; creates and supports roles for a diverse set of partners. by leading through planning means the Authority provides clear goals and offers guidance to regional and community partners; anticipates the growth and development of the region; takes initiative to execute and implement transit plans and projects; works with partners to locate, promote, and implement transit-supportive development in a broad planning context. by leading through wise investment of physical, economic, and human resources means the Authority manages transit operations and services effectively and efficiently, provides a satisfying work environment for UTA employees;

creates and maintains mission/goal driven decision making processes; maintains an appropriate balance between system expansion and maintenance; continually evaluates and distributes resources for greatest value. Effective Date: April 26, 2006 Adopted by: R2006-04-06 2

Ends Policy No. 1.2.1 Safety The Board of Trustees of the Utah Transit Authority expects that within reason and budgetary constraints UTA properties, facilities and operations are safe for employees, passengers and the general public: 1. Properties are free from conditions that contribute to accidents and injuries. 2. Facilities, including vehicles, are free from unacceptable hazardous conditions and methods of operation. 3. Operations are conducted in environments and in ways that are safe for all who participate in them with minimal disruption of service. 4. Passengers and employees feel safe from hazards and violence. 5. Facilities are safeguarded against vandalism, violence, sabotage and terrorism. 6. Employees are vigilant in correcting observed and/or reported unsafe conditions and practices. Adopted by Resolution 441 9/30/2002 Amended R2012-08-02 8/22/2012

Ends Policy No. 1.2.2 Advertising The Board of Trustees of the Utah Transit Authority, acting in its proprietary capacity, allows for advertising on its public transit vehicles, its electronic media, or facilities consistent with contractual agreements, local ordinances, and State and federal laws as a method of preserving or increasing ridership while generating additional revenue to support the Authority s public transit operations and otherwise enhance the Authority s Mission. Advertisements on any Authority vehicle, electronic media, or facility adhere to the restrictions set forth in the Board s Executive Limitations Policy regarding Advertising. Advertisements on Authority s vehicles shall not interfere with the Authority s branding or cause confusion to the public. Except where specifically designated otherwise, the Authority s property is reserved for use by the Authority only. Nothing in this policy or the authorizations created hereunder is intended to alter or change any designation by the Authority of its respective properties as non-public fora. Ends Policy 1.2.2 Adopted 12/17/03 Revised R2007-12-05 12/19/07 Amended R2011-09-01 9/28/2011

Ends Policy No. 1.2.3 Effective Administration of Utah Transit Authority Utah Transit Authority management and staff will administer UTA in a manner that anticipates future growth with appropriate planning and investment. UTA management and staff will periodically adjust services and fare policies according to a published set of criteria that appropriately price services, optimize ridership and revenues, and provide affordable transportation options for everyone, including transit-dependent populations. Effective Date: April 26, 2006 Adopted by: R2006-04-07 1

Ends Policy No. 1.2.4 Procurement All procurements by and for the Utah Transit Authority are carried out in full compliance with State and federal law and in compliance with established Board policy. Effective Date: January 28, 2004 Adopted by R2004-01-08

Ends Policy No.1.2.5 Private Enterprise Participation The Authority meets transportation needs of the community with the assistance of private enterprise as appropriate in order to realize efficiencies and savings. The Authority evaluates its services and operations in comparison with private enterprise options and makes prudent decisions regarding utilization of internal and contracted services. 04-28-04 Adopted R2004-04-06 03-28-12 Amended R2012-03-02

Board Ends Policy 1.2.6 Debt Service Reserve and Rate Stabilization Fund Created. Utah Transit Authority shall establish and fund on a regular basis, a Debt Service Reserve and Rate Stabilization Fund (the Fund ), which shall be a restricted reserve of the Authority to be used only for specific purposes as defined herein. The Debt Service Reserve and Rate Stabilization Fund shall be funded as follows; - Annually, any savings experienced in the amount of actual variable interest expense from budgeted variable interest expense for the same time period shall be place into the fund. In this case, variable interest expense is defined as the sum of interest expense, remarketing fees, letter of credit or bond insurance fees and any other fees associated with the cost of the debt, excepting initial costs of issuance. For purposes of this policy, the interest expense portion shall be budgeted at 3.6% per annum. Beginning in 2013, contributions from this source shall be funded at the following rate; 2013 at 25%, 2014 at 75%, 2015 and years after at 100%. - Any unused monies from debt service reserve funds established for specific bonds may be placed into the Fund when no longer encumbered for the initially reserved debt. - One time contributions as determined by the General Manager from unused funds in the current year s budget. - Beginning in 2014, in the event UTA issues refunding bonds that generate net interest expense savings, said savings shall be deposited into the Fund at the end of each Fiscal year, to be used in a manner consistent with this policy. - For purposes of this Policy, net interest expense savings shall be calculated as the difference between the interest that would have been paid on the old refunded debt less the sum of interest on the new refunding debt (including interest on any increase in par amount needed to fund an escrow for an advanced refunding) plus a pro-rata share of the costs of issuance of the new debt. The Fund may be used in any of the following ways: - To make up the difference when actual variable interest expense exceeds budgeted variable interest expense of the Authority, in times of a rising interest rate environment. - To pay any scheduled debt service payments when the current year budget is unable to do so.

- To retire debt of the Authority prior to scheduled maturity without the use of a refunding bond issue. - To be pledged as a self-funded debt service reserve for new bond issues. - To be pledged as collateral for a short term bank line of credit. Process for using the Fund: The General Manager or designee may use a portion of the Fund for the purposes identified herein above. The General Manager shall report any use of the Fund to the Finance and Operations Committee. The UTA Board of Trustees, through a majority vote of the Board, may eliminate the funding of this reserve at any time or may alter the permitted use of the Fund as it sees fit. Adopted R2012-09-03 September 26, 2012 Amended January 22, 2014 2

Ends Policy No. 1.3.1 Customers with Disabilities The Board of Trustees of the Utah Transit Authority encourages the independent mobility of all customers, with fixed-route being the primary service. For those customers whose in-person disability evaluation certifies them unable to utilize the Authority s fixed-route service, the Authority is committed to providing paratransit transportation throughout the Authority s service area as practical within budget constraints and in compliance with all applicable federal laws and regulations. Effective Date: August 27, 2003 Adopted by: R2003-08-02 Change History Date Change Definition 06/11/14 Reviewed & Updated by Stakeholder Relations Committee 06/25/14 Changes adopted by the Board of Trustees

Ends Policy No. 1.3.2 Preservation of Mission and Purpose To preserve Utah Transit Authority s primary mission and purpose, the Authority maintains maximum flexibility and independence. The Authority: 1. Fosters balanced, mutually beneficial partnerships with governmental entities, private corporations and community groups. 2. Retains system-stakeholder ownership and control of the Authority by strengthening geo-political relationships. Effective Date: August 27, 2003 Adopted by: R2003-08-06 Change History Date Change Definition 05/07/14 Reviewed & Updated by Stakeholder Relations Committee 05/21/14 Changes adopted by the Board of Trustees

Ends Policy No. 1.3.3 Internal Communications and Partnering The Authority maximizes employee performance, growth, commitment, unity, creativity and breadth of contribution in that it: 1. Continually improves communications and relationships among employees at all levels and across all departments. 2. Makes decisions with consideration of the interests of all concerned. 3. Promotes a sense of employee ownership and a sense of family. 4. Provides ongoing training for its employees. Effective Date: September 24, 2003 Adopted by R2003-09-08 Date Change Definition 05/07/14 Reviewed & Updated by Stakeholder Relations Committee 05/21/14 Changes adopted by the Board of Trustees

Ends Policy No. 1.3.4 Quality Transportation Services Utah Transit Authority provides high quality, convenient transportation services and facilities, including fixed route bus, light rail, regional commuter rail, van pools, paratransit, ridesharing, streetcar, bus rapid transit, bicycle and pedestrian transportation accessibility. By following best management practices, UTA delivers transportation services that: Provide environmental benefits to the region and its communities Are safe and efficient Address the needs of the region s persons with disabilities Facilitate basic mobility, transportation solutions and access for citizens along the Wasatch Front. Effective Date: April 26, 2006 Adopted by: R2006-04-08 04-22-15 Changes accepted by Board of Trustees 1

Ends Policy No. 1.3.5 Essential Partners Utah Transit Authority works with essential partners on planning, funding, community development, construction, and special services to increase transit ridership. Essential partners include, without limitation; federal funding and regulatory agencies, metropolitan planning organizations, Utah Department of Transportation, counties, municipalities, or other political subdivisions, state legislature, businesses, educational institutions, and developers. Through these partnerships, UTA Facilitates economic development Encourages development of community facilities and public spaces Increases the integration of transit-dependent populations Builds relationships with existing partners and identifies potential new partners on a continuous basis Provides clear goals and offers guidance to regional and community partners Anticipates the growth and development of the region Provides quality service to transit-dependent populations. Effective Date: April 26, 2006 Adopted by: R2006-04-09 Change History Date Change Definition 01-28-15 Approved by the Board of Trustees 1

Ends Policy No. 1.3.6 Leadership and Support Utah Transit Authority contributes leadership by communicating transportation needs and public opinion to elected leaders; facilitating and communicating a long-range vision for transportation and community development; cultivating harmonious relationships among a diverse set of partners; and working with those partners to locate, promote and implement transit-supportive development in a broad planning context. UTA supports issues related to transportation, environmental quality, economic development, land use, planning and community and regional development. Effective Date: May 24, 2006 Adopted by: R2006-05-01 Change History Date Change Definition 01-28-15 Changes approved by Board of Trustees

Ends Policy No. 1.3.7 Promoting a Feeling of Community Ownership Utah Transit Authority promotes a feeling of community (public) ownership of the transit system by contributing to municipal planning activities; coordinating transit services with community development; helping communities meet air quality standards; enhancing the overall effectiveness of the regional transportation network; and helping communities meet their transportation needs and desires. Effective Date: May 24, 2006 Adopted by: R2006-05-02 Change History Date Change Definition 01-28-15 Changes approved by the Board of Trustees

Ends Policy No. 1.4.1.a Property Acquisition To achieve the Utah Transit Authority s vision to provide quality transportation services, the Authority acquires real property within the district as permitted within reason and budgetary constraints: 1. Acquisition of real property that is now needed or that may be needed in the future for the provision of transit ( Transit Property ) within the Authority s district is a priority of the Authority. This may include property acquired: a. To meet a defined transit need including property for expansion or alteration of an existing project or for a new project; b. To enhance and protect existing transit properties; c. To preserve transportation corridors that may be useful for providing transit in the future; d. To meet the objectives of a long-range transit plan; e. To preserve for an identified transit purpose; f. To preserve for future transit purposes; g. To enhance the value or functionality of the Authority s transit properties, to enhance transit ridership, or to improve the quality of service provided to the Authority s riders; h. To provide for relocation of tenants and owners as may be required by state or federal law or regulation, or by contract with a governmental entity. 2. Acquisition of real property that is not currently needed for transit use but that will support transit development within the Authority s district ( Transit Supportive Development ) is another priority of the Authority. This may include property acquired: a. To enhance transit use; b. To improve the quality of service provided to the Authority s riders; c. To generate revenue for the purpose of supporting public transit by selling, trading or leasing the Authority s real property assets. Effective Date: April 28, 2004 Adopted by R2004-04-03 04-22-15 Policy reviewed and approved with no changes

Ends Policy No. 1.4.1.b Property - Encumbrance To achieve the Utah Transit Authority s vision to provide quality transportation services, the Authority discourages any encumbrance on, across or along railroad right-of-way property if such encumbrance would tend to limit, proscribe or interfere with the present or future uses of the railroad right-of-way property by the Authority in a safe manner for transportation purposes. Effective Date: April 28, 2004 Adopted by R2004-04-04 04-22-15 Reviewed and Approved by Board of Trustees

Ends Policy No. 1.4.2 Planning, Design, Funding, and Construction of Transportation Infrastructure and Services Utah Transit Authority plans, funds, designs and builds transportation infrastructure and services according to the long range regional transportation plans of the Wasatch Front Region Council and the Mountainlands Association of Governments. UTA takes initiative to execute and implement transit plans. UTA plans and designs transportation facilities and services to: Link communities with transit services consistent with a regional plan Increase connections and efficiency of movement at regional, community, and neighborhood levels, including pedestrian accessibility Increase citizens accessibility to daily destinations and expand their freedoms and choices Provide direct and convenient access for riders Maintain an appropriate balance between system expansion and maintenance Reflect continual evaluation and distribution of resources for greatest value. Address the needs of the region s persons with disabilities. Effective Date: April 26, 2006 Adopted by: R2006-04-10 Change History Date Change Definition 01-28-15 Changes approved by UTA Board of Trustees 1

Ends Policy No. 1.4.3 Funding The Authority secures funding to meet future growth needs in that it: 1. Works aggressively and creatively at the national, state and local level to secure solid financial support necessary to implement long-range regional transit plans approved by the metropolitan planning organizations. 2. Works with metropolitan planning organizations and local government to identify community needs and priorities, and to document priorities in MPO long-range regional transportation plans. 3. Frees organizational resources through creative development of efficiencies. 4. Optimizes revenues and operating costs to achieve the greatest possible ridership with the lowest investment per rider. Effective Date: September 24, 2003 Adopted by: R2003-09-06 Change History Date Change Definition 09/24/03 Original Effective Date 06/11/14 Reviewed & Updated by Stakeholder Relations Committee 06/25/14 Changes adopted by the Board of Trustees