Anexos. Pruebas de estacionariedad. Null Hypothesis: TES has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=9)

Similar documents
LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I

LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN. = Pengeluaran Konsumsi Masyarakat (milyar rupiah) = Jumlah Uang Beredar (milyar rupiah) = Laju Inflasi (dalam persentase)

Appendixes Appendix 1 Data of Dependent Variables and Independent Variables Period

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 1. 2) descriptive statistics and correlogram. Series: LGCSI Sample 12/31/ /11/2009 Observations 2596

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 2. 2) graphs. 3) unit root tests

LAMPIRAN. Tahun Bulan NPF (Milyar Rupiah)

Assist. Prof. Dr. Nuray İslatince 1

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

Kabupaten Langkat Suku Bunga Kredit. PDRB harga berlaku

An empirical study on the dynamic relationship between crude oil prices and Nigeria stock market

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANNEL OF MONETARY POLICY TRANSMISSION MECHANISM IN SRI LANKA

LAMPIRAN. Null Hypothesis: LO has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: 1 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=13)

An Investigation of Effective Factors on Export in Iran

Export and Import Regressions on 2009Q1 preliminary release data Menzie Chinn, 23 June 2009 ( )

LAMPIRAN PERHITUNGAN EVIEWS

Hasil Common Effect Model

Relationship between Oil Price, Exchange Rates and Stock Market: An Empirical study of Indian stock market

esia/perkembangan/

ملحق رقم( 1 ): الا نحدار للدالة اللوغریثمیة للناتج المحلي الا جمالي

Impact of FDI and Net Trade on GDP of India Using Cointegration approach

ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE EXPENSES OF SOCIAL PROTECTION AND THE ANTICIPATED OLD AGE PENSION

Lampiran 1. Tabulasi Data

Lampiran 1. Data Penelitian

An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Inflation in Nigeria

Impact of Some Selected Macroeconomic Variables (Money Supply and Deposit Interest Rate) on Share Prices: A Study of Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE)

POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ECONOMETRICS. Mr.

ESTIMATING MONEY DEMAND FOR GHANA Victor Osei Research Department, Bank of Ghana

Lampiran 1 : Grafik Data HIV Asli

Lampiran I Data. PDRB (Juta Rupiah) PMA (Juta Rupiah) PMDN (Juta Rupiah) Tahun. Luas Sawit (ha)

Effect Of Government Social Expenditure On Economic Growth In Nigeria ( )

CHAPTER 5 MARKET LEVEL INDUSTRY LEVEL AND FIRM LEVEL VOLATILITY

Factor Affecting Yields for Treasury Bills In Pakistan?

Estimating Egypt s Potential Output: A Production Function Approach

Trade Misinvoicing and Macroeconomic Outcomes in India

THE FISCAL REVENUES AND PUBLIC EXPENDITURES: IS THEIR EVOLUTION SUSTENABLE? THE ROMANIAN CASE. Bogdan Dima 1 Oana Lobonţ 2 Cristina Nicolescu 3

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EXTERNAL RESERVES AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NIGERIA ( )

The Influence of Leverage and Profitability on Earnings Quality: Jordanian Case

Interactions between United States (VIX) and United Kingdom (VFTSE) Market Volatility: A Time Series Study

Financial Risk, Liquidity Risk and their Effect on the Listed Jordanian Islamic Bank's Performance

Determinants of Merchandise Export Performance in Sri Lanka

SUSTAINABILITY PLANNING POLICY COLLECTING THE REVENUES OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATION

Monetary Policy and Economic Stability in Nigeria: An Empirical Analysis

An Analysis of Stock Returns and Exchange Rates: Evidence from IT Industry in India

Time Series Analysis of Inflation and RBI Policy Rates

IMPACT OF MACROECONOMIC VARIABLE ON STOCK MARKET RETURN AND ITS VOLATILITY

Economics 442 Macroeconomic Policy (Spring 2015) 3/23/2015. Instructor: Prof. Menzie Chinn UW Madison

Macroeconomic Variables and the Dynamic Effect of Public Expenditure: Long-term Trend Analysis in Nigeria

A case study of Cointegration relationship between Tax Revenue and Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Sri Lanka

Monetary Sector Analysis of Bangladesh- Causality and Weak Exogeneity

ملحق رقم (1) بیانات الدراسة :

The Impact of Monetary Policies on Nigeria s Unemployment: Lessons for Poverty Reduction in Nigeria

Financial Econometrics: Problem Set # 3 Solutions

A FUNCTION FOR THE ARGENTINE EXPORT DEMAND. Maria Luisa Streb

The effect of Money Supply and Inflation rate on the Performance of National Stock Exchange

LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN. A. Perhitungan Return On Asset

9. Appendixes. Page 73 of 95

Forecasting the Philippine Stock Exchange Index using Time Series Analysis Box-Jenkins

Empirical Investigation of the Twin Deficits Hypothesis: The Egyptian Case ( )

BYLAAG: E-VIEWS RESULTATE VAN DIE MODEL VAN VOORRAADINVESTERING IN SUID-AFRIKA

THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RELATION BETWEEN FDI, EXPORTS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH FOR ROMANIA

Composition of Government Expenditure and Economic Growth in Ethiopia ( G.C)

Econometric Models for the Analysis of Financial Portfolios

Influence of Macroeconomic Indicators on Mutual Funds Market in India

Lampiran 1 Lampiran 1 Data Keuangan Bank konvensional

LAMPIRAN 1. Retribusi (ribu Rp)

Donald Trump's Random Walk Up Wall Street

The Frequency of Wars*

IS THE MARKET SIZE HYPOTHESIS RELEVANT FOR BOTSWANA? VECTOR ERROR CORRECTION FRAMEWORK

Dynamic Causal Relationships among the Greater China Stock markets

Foreign and Public Investment and Economic Growth: The Case of Romania

Notes on the Treasury Yield Curve Forecasts. October Kara Naccarelli

BEcon Program, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University Page 1/7

TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS OF AN EFFICIENT MARKET IN TERMS OF INFORMATION THE CASE OF THE CAPITAL MARKET IN ROMANIA DURING RECESSION

Impact of Fed s Credit Easing on the Value of U.S. Dollar

AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC DEBT RELEVANCE TO THE ECONOMIC GROWTH OF THE USA

Empirical Analysis of Private Investments: The Case of Pakistan

Impact of Monetary Policy on Small Scale Enterprises Financing in Nigeria

Relative Effectiveness of Fiscal and Monetary Policies in Nigeria

COTTON: PHYSICAL PRICES BECOMING MORE RESPONSIVE TO FUTURES PRICES0F

Methods for A Time Series Approach to Estimating Excess Mortality Rates in Puerto Rico, Post Maria 1 Menzie Chinn 2 August 10, 2018 Procedure:

The effect of Gold Value and US dollar exchange rate against the Jakarta Islamic Index

الملحق رقم (1): یوضح متغیرات النموذج.

DATA PENELITIAN. Pendapatan Nasional (PDB Perkapita atas Dasar Harga Berlaku) Produksi Bawang Merah Indonesia MB X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6

Analysis of the Influence of the Annualized Rate of Rentability on the Unit Value of the Net Assets of the Private Administered Pension Fund NN

The Relative Effectiveness of Monetary and Fiscal Policies on Economic Growth in Bangladesh

EXTERNAL FACTORS INFLUENCE ON INFLATION: THE CASE OF ROMANIA

Outward FDI and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Germany

Appendix. Table A.1 (Part A) The Author(s) 2015 G. Chakrabarti and C. Sen, Green Investing, SpringerBriefs in Finance, DOI /

Photovoltaic deployment: from subsidies to a market-driven growth: A panel econometrics approach

Impact of Direct Taxes on GDP: A Study

The Effects of Oil Price Volatility on Some Macroeconomic Variables in Nigeria: Application of Garch and Var Models

EVIDENCES OF INTERDEPENDENCY IN THE POLICY RESPONSES OF MAJOR CENTRAL BANKS: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS USING VAR MODEL

Okun s Law - an empirical test using Brazilian data

Openness and Inflation

AFRREV IJAH, Vol.3 (1) January, 2014

THE TWIN DEFICIT HYPOTHESIS: THE CASE OF BULGARIA

Does it influence? Macro variables on stock returns.

An Empirical Research on the Relationship Between Non-Interest Income Business and Operation Performance of Commercial Banks

The Credit Cycle and the Business Cycle in the Economy of Turkey

Unit Roots and Co-Integration Tests: the Effects of Consumer Price Index (CPI) on Non-Performing Loans (NPL) in the Banking Sector in Malaysia

Transcription:

Anexos Pruebas de estacionariedad Null Hypothesis: TES has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -1.739333 0.4042 Test critical values: 1% level -3.610453 5% level -2.938987 10% level -2.607932 Dependent Variable: D(TES) Date: 01/23/18 Time: 16:28 Sample (adjusted): 2008Q1 2017Q3 Included observations: 39 after adjustments TES(-1) -0.113710 0.065375-1.739333 0.0903 C 0.733568 0.500486 1.465711 0.1512 R-squared 0.075584 Mean dependent var -0.111769 Adjusted R-squared 0.050600 S.D. dependent var 0.765869 S.E. of regression 0.746241 Akaike info criterion 2.302385 Sum squared resid 20.60442 Schwarz criterion 2.387696 Log likelihood -42.89651 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.332994 F-statistic 3.025278 Durbin-Watson stat 1.656137 Prob(F-statistic) 0.090291 Null Hypothesis: D(TES) has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -5.653135 0.0000 Test critical values: 1% level -3.615588 5% level -2.941145 10% level -2.609066

Dependent Variable: D(TES,2) Date: 01/23/18 Time: 16:29 Sample (adjusted): 2008Q2 2017Q3 Included observations: 38 after adjustments D(TES(-1)) -0.899734 0.159157-5.653135 0.0000 C -0.134639 0.123210-1.092767 0.2818 R-squared 0.470260 Mean dependent var -0.030105 Adjusted R-squared 0.455546 S.D. dependent var 1.017674 S.E. of regression 0.750913 Akaike info criterion 2.316141 Sum squared resid 20.29932 Schwarz criterion 2.402330 Log likelihood -42.00668 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.346807 F-statistic 31.95793 Durbin-Watson stat 2.041372 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000002 Null Hypothesis: EMBI has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -2.301936 0.1764 Test critical values: 1% level -3.610453 5% level -2.938987 10% level -2.607932 Dependent Variable: D(EMBI) Date: 01/23/18 Time: 16:33 Sample (adjusted): 2008Q1 2017Q3 Included observations: 39 after adjustments EMBI(-1) -0.248701 0.108040-2.301936 0.0271 C 0.552525 0.254282 2.172883 0.0363 R-squared 0.125273 Mean dependent var 0.004872 Adjusted R-squared 0.101632 S.D. dependent var 0.591461 S.E. of regression 0.560600 Akaike info criterion 1.730302 Sum squared resid 11.62807 Schwarz criterion 1.815613

Log likelihood -31.74089 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.760911 F-statistic 5.298910 Durbin-Watson stat 1.498400 Prob(F-statistic) 0.027068 Null Hypothesis: D(EMBI) has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -5.287640 0.0001 Test critical values: 1% level -3.615588 5% level -2.941145 10% level -2.609066 Dependent Variable: D(EMBI,2) Date: 01/23/18 Time: 16:33 Sample (adjusted): 2008Q2 2017Q3 Included observations: 38 after adjustments D(EMBI(-1)) -0.855821 0.161853-5.287640 0.0000 C -0.013649 0.095672-0.142661 0.8874 R-squared 0.437141 Mean dependent var -0.015000 Adjusted R-squared 0.421506 S.D. dependent var 0.775401 S.E. of regression 0.589761 Akaike info criterion 1.832997 Sum squared resid 12.52145 Schwarz criterion 1.919186 Log likelihood -32.82695 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.863663 F-statistic 27.95914 Durbin-Watson stat 1.865027 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000006 Null Hypothesis: INF has a unit root Lag Length: 1 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=9) Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -2.797326 0.0681 Test critical values: 1% level -3.615588 5% level -2.941145 10% level -2.609066

Dependent Variable: D(INF) Date: 01/23/18 Time: 16:34 Sample (adjusted): 2008Q2 2017Q3 Included observations: 38 after adjustments INF(-1) -0.150187 0.053689-2.797326 0.0083 D(INF(-1)) 0.637284 0.127795 4.986755 0.0000 C 0.603526 0.247804 2.435502 0.0201 R-squared 0.447760 Mean dependent var -0.051579 Adjusted R-squared 0.416203 S.D. dependent var 0.834805 S.E. of regression 0.637846 Akaike info criterion 2.014218 Sum squared resid 14.23968 Schwarz criterion 2.143501 Log likelihood -35.27015 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.060216 F-statistic 14.18911 Durbin-Watson stat 1.967987 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000031 Null Hypothesis: D(INF) has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -3.154147 0.0309 Test critical values: 1% level -3.615588 5% level -2.941145 10% level -2.609066 Dependent Variable: D(INF,2) Date: 01/23/18 Time: 16:34 Sample (adjusted): 2008Q2 2017Q3 Included observations: 38 after adjustments D(INF(-1)) -0.431438 0.136784-3.154147 0.0032 C -0.026143 0.113021-0.231313 0.8184 R-squared 0.216517 Mean dependent var -0.006842 Adjusted R-squared 0.194753 S.D. dependent var 0.775263 S.E. of regression 0.695687 Akaike info criterion 2.163361 Sum squared resid 17.42328 Schwarz criterion 2.249550 Log likelihood -39.10386 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.194027 F-statistic 9.948642 Durbin-Watson stat 1.771602

Prob(F-statistic) 0.003243 Examen de residuales de las estimaciones de regresión por MCO de la metodología Engle- Granger Examen de residuales de EQ03 Null Hypothesis: RESIDDEEQ03 has a unit root Lag Length: 1 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=9) Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -2.301083 0.1768 Test critical values: 1% level -3.615588 5% level -2.941145 10% level -2.609066 Dependent Variable: D(RESIDDEEQ03) Date: 01/29/18 Time: 10:14 Sample (adjusted): 2008Q2 2017Q3 Included observations: 38 after adjustments RESIDDEEQ03(-1) -0.195295 0.084871-2.301083 0.0275 D(RESIDDEEQ03(-1)) 0.351881 0.154218 2.281711 0.0287 C 0.006129 0.112343 0.054559 0.9568 R-squared 0.191599 Mean dependent var 0.009120 Adjusted R-squared 0.145404 S.D. dependent var 0.748838 S.E. of regression 0.692259 Akaike info criterion 2.177942 Sum squared resid 16.77277 Schwarz criterion 2.307225 Log likelihood -38.38090 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.223940 F-statistic 4.147663 Durbin-Watson stat 1.644520 Prob(F-statistic) 0.024181 Examen de residuales de EQ04 Null Hypothesis: RESIDDEEQ04 has a unit root

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -3.194636 0.0279 Test critical values: 1% level -3.610453 5% level -2.938987 10% level -2.607932 Dependent Variable: D(RESIDDEEQ04) Date: 01/29/18 Time: 10:23 Sample (adjusted): 2008Q1 2017Q3 Included observations: 39 after adjustments RESIDDEEQ04(-1) -0.431542 0.135083-3.194636 0.0029 C -0.053226 0.110963-0.479676 0.6343 R-squared 0.216196 Mean dependent var -0.067754 Adjusted R-squared 0.195013 S.D. dependent var 0.771701 S.E. of regression 0.692379 Akaike info criterion 2.152553 Sum squared resid 17.73737 Schwarz criterion 2.237864 Log likelihood -39.97479 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.183162 F-statistic 10.20570 Durbin-Watson stat 1.782162 Prob(F-statistic) 0.002860 Prueba de cointegración de Johansen Date: 01/25/18 Time: 17:32 Sample (adjusted): 2008Q3 2017Q3 Included observations: 37 after adjustments Trend assumption: Linear deterministic trend Series: INF TES EMBI Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 2 Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Trace) Hypothesized Trace 0.05 No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value * None * 0.589340 47.49852 29.79707 0.0002 At most 1 0.218863 14.56890 15.49471 0.0686 At most 2 * 0.136489 5.429719 3.841466 0.0198 Trace test indicates 1 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level * denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level **MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values

Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Maximum Eigenvalue) Hypothesized Max-Eigen 0.05 No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value * None * 0.589340 32.92962 21.13162 0.0007 At most 1 0.218863 9.139178 14.26460 0.2747 At most 2 * 0.136489 5.429719 3.841466 0.0198 Max-eigenvalue test indicates 1 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level * denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level **MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values Unrestricted Cointegrating Coefficients (normalized by b'*s11*b=i): INF TES EMBI -0.465777-0.662641 1.842287 0.122112-0.012241-1.694436 0.725391-0.522119-0.395473 Unrestricted Adjustment Coefficients (alpha): D(INF) 0.164655 0.172698-0.156191 D(TES) 0.308637 0.246124 0.069940 D(EMBI) -0.244512 0.157592-0.057493 1 Cointegrating Equation(s): Log likelihood -72.88301 Normalized cointegrating coefficients (standard error in parentheses) INF TES EMBI 1.000000 1.422657-3.955299 (0.27945) (0.66648) Adjustment coefficients (standard error in parentheses) D(INF) -0.076693 (0.04998) D(TES) -0.143756 (0.05325) D(EMBI) 0.113888 (0.03663) 2 Cointegrating Equation(s): Log likelihood -68.31342 Normalized cointegrating coefficients (standard error in parentheses) INF TES EMBI 1.000000 0.000000-13.22309 (4.00583) 0.000000 1.000000 6.514422 (2.83447) Adjustment coefficients (standard error in parentheses) D(INF) -0.055604-0.111221 (0.04931) (0.06786)

D(TES) -0.113702-0.207529 (0.05046) (0.06945) D(EMBI) 0.133132 0.160095 (0.03515) (0.04838) El modelo MCE Vector Error Correction Estimates Date: 01/25/18 Time: 17:33 Sample (adjusted): 2008Q3 2017Q3 Included observations: 37 after adjustments Standard errors in ( ) & t-statistics in [ ] Cointegrating Eq: CointEq1 INF(-1) 1.000000 TES(-1) 1.422657 (0.27945) [ 5.09093] EMBI(-1) -3.955299 (0.66648) [-5.93459] C -5.716436 Error Correction: D(INF) D(TES) D(EMBI) CointEq1-0.076693-0.143756 0.113888 (0.04998) (0.05325) (0.03663) [-1.53450] [-2.69979] [ 3.10919] D(INF(-1)) 0.454726 0.086354-0.152902 (0.21954) (0.23390) (0.16090) [ 2.07124] [ 0.36919] [-0.95027] D(INF(-2)) 0.057567 0.138311 0.093022 (0.19661) (0.20947) (0.14410) [ 0.29280] [ 0.66030] [ 0.64555] D(TES(-1)) 0.371378 0.128561 0.105296 (0.17691) (0.18848) (0.12966) [ 2.09922] [ 0.68209] [ 0.81210] D(TES(-2)) 0.241248-0.044005 0.131058 (0.17509) (0.18654) (0.12832) [ 1.37788] [-0.23591] [ 1.02133] D(EMBI(-1)) -0.197184-0.303465 0.339416 (0.22837) (0.24330) (0.16737) [-0.86344] [-1.24727] [ 2.02792]

D(EMBI(-2)) -0.202503-0.081787-0.172533 (0.21871) (0.23301) (0.16029) [-0.92589] [-0.35100] [-1.07636] C 0.019761-0.164645 0.027395 (0.11203) (0.11936) (0.08211) [ 0.17638] [-1.37940] [ 0.33364] R-squared 0.486210 0.248573 0.476984 Adj. R-squared 0.362192 0.067194 0.350739 Sum sq. resids 12.35429 14.02285 6.635986 S.E. equation 0.652694 0.695375 0.478359 F-statistic 3.920476 1.370460 3.778232 Log likelihood -32.20780-34.55148-20.71013 Akaike AIC 2.173395 2.300080 1.551899 Schwarz SC 2.521701 2.648387 1.900205 Mean dependent -0.086757-0.182675-0.004595 S.D. dependent 0.817269 0.719985 0.593668 Determinant resid covariance (dof adj.) 0.021426 Determinant resid covariance 0.010317 Log likelihood -72.88301 Akaike information criterion 5.399082 Schwarz criterion 6.574616 Prueba de normalidad residual del MCE VEC Residual Normality Tests Orthogonalization: Cholesky (Lutkepohl) Null Hypothesis: residuals are multivariate normal Date: 01/30/18 Time: 09:00 Sample: 2007Q4 2017Q3 Included observations: 37 Component Skewness Chi-sq df Prob. 1-0.238462 0.350661 1 0.5537 2 0.755429 3.519154 1 0.0607 3-0.045535 0.012786 1 0.9100 Joint 3.882602 3 0.2744 Component Kurtosis Chi-sq df Prob. 1 2.737621 0.106132 1 0.7446 2 3.415613 0.266299 1 0.6058 3 2.045561 1.404386 1 0.2360 Joint 1.776818 3 0.6200

Component Jarque-Bera df Prob. 1 0.456793 2 0.7958 2 3.785453 2 0.1507 3 1.417172 2 0.4923 Joint 5.659419 6 0.4624 No existen problemas de no normalidad con ninguna de las ecuaciones, ya que las probabilidades resultan ser mayores que 0,05 en todos los casos (0,7958; 0,1507; 0,4923 y 0,4624), y por tanto, se puede aceptar la normalidad de los errores. Prueba de Autocorrelación VEC Residual Serial Correlation LM Tests Null Hypothesis: no serial correlation at lag order h Date: 01/30/18 Time: 09:04 Sample: 2007Q4 2017Q3 Included observations: 37 Lags LM-Stat Prob 1 13.00979 0.1622 2 7.644761 0.5703 Probs from chi-square with 9 df. No hay problema de autocorrelación, ya que 0,5703 > 0,05 y se acepta la hipótesis Ho: No correlación serial. Prueba de Heteroscedasticidad VEC Residual Heteroskedasticity Tests: No Cross Terms (only levels and squares) Date: 01/30/18 Time: 09:05 Sample: 2007Q4 2017Q3 Included observations: 37 Joint test: Chi-sq df Prob. 89.78147 84 0.3130

Individual components: Dependent R-squared F(14,22) Prob. Chi-sq(14) Prob. res1*res1 0.462130 1.350151 0.2566 17.09883 0.2509 res2*res2 0.355191 0.865618 0.6012 13.14208 0.5154 res3*res3 0.293305 0.652203 0.7936 10.85229 0.6976 res2*res1 0.645280 2.858625 0.0134 23.87536 0.0474 res3*res1 0.395976 1.030172 0.4615 14.65112 0.4024 res3*res2 0.446436 1.267320 0.3005 16.51814 0.2828 No hay problemas de heteroscedasticidad por cuanto 0,3130 > 0,05, es decir, se acepta la Ho: la varianza de los errores es homoscedástica.