SEA&RDP. SEA and rural development programmes. Yvette IZABEL DG environment- Unit A3: Cohesion Policy and Environmental assessments

Similar documents
Application of the SEA to the programmes

PE-CONS 3619/3/01 REV 3

"The environmental assessment of plans, programmes and projects under the EU environmental legislation: successes failures prospects"

SEA legal and institutional framework

Protocol on SEA and the EU SEA Directive transposition into national legislation

Mid Sussex. Neighbourhood Plans Strategic Environmental Assessment. Screening Report. June 2013

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

The LIFE Programme

GUIDANCE FICHE PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK REVIEW AND RESERVE IN VERSION 1 9 APRIL 2013 RELEVANT PROVISIONS IN THE DRAFT LEGISLATION

ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANS

Tracking climate expenditure

LIFE + : An overview. 4 December 2009 Dr. Christina Marouli, LIFE 07/ENV/GR/280. External Monitoring Team, SE Europe

This note has been prepared by the Directorate-General for Regional Policy.

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 4 October /04 ENV 519. NOTE from : Presidency

Flood Risk Management Plan for the BALLYTEIGUE BANNOW River Basin (UoM13)

Official Journal of the European Union L 347/185

EU financing for biodiversity and nature: German experiences show need of fundamental changes Christa Ratte

Directive 2007/60/EC. A new EU legal context on the assessment and management of flood risks. OJ L288, , p.27. water.europa.

Council of the European Union Brussels, 10 May 2017 (OR. en)

Guidance for Member States on Performance framework, review and reserve

Financing Natura 2000 through European Funding Instruments

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. The Commission has based its decision on the following considerations:

EU Funding Maria Brättemark WFD Team, DG ENV.D.1, European Commission

Financing Climate Action by the ESIF

The new LIFE Regulation ( ) 23 September 2013

EU Budget for the future ERDF/CF. June 2018 EVALNET. #CohesionPolicy #EUinmyRegion #ESIFOpendata

Strengthening the uptake of EU funds for Natura Alberto Arroyo Schnell, WWF Lisbon, 24th Jan 2014

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

CAP, including rural development, and IPARD post-2013

Flood Risk Management Plan for the NORTH WESTERN River Basin (UoM01)

in the EU A new EU legal context on the assessment and management of flood water.europa.eu Maria Brättemark, WFD Team, DG ENV.D.1, European Commission

The new LIFE Programme

DRAFT STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCREENING REPORT. Climate Change Sectoral Adaptation Plan for Flood Risk Management ( )

Interreg Alpine Space programme

THE LIFE PROGRAMME

COMMISSION DECISION. C(2007)6121 of 12/12/2007

LIFE Environment and Resource Efficiency TECHNICAL APPLICATION FORMS Part A administrative information

Damage remediation within annex II of the ELD

Guidance for Member States on Performance framework, review and reserve

Communication, Legal Affairs & Civil Protection Protecting the Natural Environment Unit: Nature and Biodiversity

DRAFT REVISED GUIDANCE NOTE ON MAJOR PROJECTS IN THE PROGRAMMING PERIOD : THRESHOLD AND CONTENTS OF COMMISSION DECISIONS

Federal Act on Environmental Impact Assessment (Environmental Impact Assessment Act 2000) SECTION 1

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee on Regional Development

3 rd Call for Project Proposals

DRAFT APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT SCREENING REPORT

Financing Natura 2000

Regulatory Implications under BREXIT

Integration of biodiversity into EU Funding

Floods Directive (2007/60/EC) : Reporting sheets Version November 2009

COMMISSION DECISION. C(2007)6376 on 18/12/2007

FAQ ON EX ANTE CONDITIONALITIES RELATING TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

14613/15 AD/cs 1 DGG 2B

Common Framework for Biodiversity-Proofing of the EU Budget

Zurich Assurance Limited - and - Winchester City Council South Downs National Park Authority

Launch Event. INTERREG IPA CBC Croatia- Serbia

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Observations on the Partnership Agreement with the Netherlands

Indicative Minimum Benchmarks

Annual Implementation Report 2015

Summary of the Partnership Agreement for Croatia,

National Agriculture and Rural Development Plan

Politiche ambientali nella politica di Coesione: le criticità

Revising 2011/92/EU The EIA Directive. July 2012 Josh Fothergill IEMA

JASPERS Advisory and capacity building support for projects and investment

Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme (Including Blackpool and Ballyvolane)

Standard Summary Project Fiche IPA decentralised National programmes (maximum 12/15 pages without the annexes)

PART A: THE PALESTINIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT POLICY. A policy to establish an environmental assessment process in Palestine

WORKSHOP MANUAL FINAL Strengthening the uptake of EU funds for Natura 2000 (ENV.B.3/SER/2012/002)

EN 1 EN. Rural Development HANDBOOK ON COMMON MONITORING AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK. Guidance document. September 2006

Working Paper Elements of strategic programming for the period

FISHERIES MEASURES FOR MARINE NATURA 2000 SITES A consistent approach to requests for fisheries management measures under the Common Fisheries Policy

EBRD s Environmental & Social (E&S) Risk Management Procedures for Leasing Activities

Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA): the Rural Development Component IPARD

Overview of CAP Reform

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

CATEGORIES OF INTERVENTION. Fiche no 6. Brussels, 14 November Commission Proposals

Floods Directive (2007/60/EC) : Reporting sheets Endorsed by Water Directors : - 30 November December 2010

PROCEDURES MANUAL. for. The technical and financial Due Diligence assessment under the NER 300 process

Ministry of Environment and Water

Official Journal of the European Union III. (Notices) COMMISSION

Programme Manual

STAKEHOLDER VIEWS on the next EU budget cycle

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. Committee on Petitions NOTICE TO MEMBERS

The CAP towards 2020

SI Natura2000 Management - Natura 2000 Management programme for Slovenia for the period LIFE11 NAT/SI/000880

Possibilities for management by objectives in EU rural development policy

Major projects in the programming period

LIMITE EN CONFERENCE ON ACCESSION TO THE EUROPEAN UNION CROATIA. Brussels, 15 April 2011 AD 13/11 LIMITE CONF-HR 8

DRAFT TEMPLATE AND GUIDELINES ON THE CONTENT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF THE

LIST OF OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME "ENVIRONMENT" , PRIORITY AXIS 6 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

FAQs Selection criteria

European Legislation 1. Indicative-Regulation (EU) No 1299/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on specific

EN 1 EN 2014BG16M1OP002 OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME ENVIRONMENT Version 4.0. First year Last year Eligible from

MEETING OF THE COMMISSION GROUP OF EIA/SEA NATIONAL EXPERTS 5-6 SEPTEMBER 2013 CITY CENTRE, HOTEL NOVOTEL VILNIUS, LITHUANIA.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

The urban dimension. in the legislative proposals for the future cohesion policy. Zsolt Szokolai DG REGIO C.2 Urban development, territorial cohesion

European Union Regional Policy Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. EU Cohesion Policy Proposals from the European Commission

EU Funds investments and projections, preparation for the period December, 2014

Quality requirements and contents

LIFE WRITERS WORKSHOP: CONCEPT NOTE

Transcription:

SEA&RDP SEA and rural development programmes Yvette IZABEL DG environment- Unit A3: Cohesion Policy and Environmental assessments

Environmental Assessment Water Framework Directive Policies Habitats and Birds Directives Water Directives (WFD, floods, marine, nitrates) Plans & Programmes covered by SEA Directive (2001/42) Projects (public - private) covered by EIA Directive (85/337/EEC, 97/11/EC 2003/35/EC & 2009/31/EC) Landfill, incineration Directives IPPC / IED Directive Carbon Capture Storage Directive

SEA Directive - Objectives High level of protection of the environment Integration of environmental considerations into the preparation of plans and programmes Promotion of sustainable development

Which plans and programmes? prepared and/or adopted by an authority at national, regional or local level AND required by legislative, regulatory or administrative provisions. The definition includes: modifications of plans and programmes P&P co-financed by the EC

P&P for which SEA is always required (art.2) a) P&P prepared for agriculture, forestry, fisheries, energy, industry, transport, waste/ water management, telecommunications, tourism, town & country planning or land use AND which set the framework for future development consent of projects listed in the EIA Directive OR b) that require an assessment under Article 6 or 7 of the Habitats Directive

P&P not covered by SEA (art. 3(8)) National defence, civil emergency, financial or budget plans/programmes (cf. in certain cases some ESF or Interreg OPs)

SEA and the planning procedure Article 4(1) The environmental assessment must be carried out: During the preparation of the plan or programme Before its adoption (or submission to the legislative process)

For projects screened out (shorter procedure) The environmental assessment procedure Screening Scoping Environmental Report/Study Information and Consultation Decision Information on decision Using screening criteria Scope and level of detail Obligatory under the SEA The Report (including a non-technical summary) Public, environmental authorities, other MS... Takes account of env. report and consultations End of EIA/SEA process Monitoring

Screening Article 3(3)-(7) and Annex II Screening Scoping Env. info Consultation Decision Information on decision Monitoring Which P&P are subject to screening? P/Ps using small areas at local level minor modifications to P/Ps. P/Ps setting the framework for future future non-eia projects and non-sector P/Ps To verify whether they are likely to have significant environmental effects: If yes SEA needed If no no SEA needed How to determine the effects? case by case examination or by specifying types of P/Ps or by combining both approaches. Annex II criteria to determine significance of effects! Opinion by the competent (environmental) authority required.

Scoping Article 5(4) Screening Scoping Env. Report Consultation Decision Information on decision i.e. what should be covered by the environmental information? Obligatory stage Opinion by the competent (environmental) authority required Competent authority may subsequently require further information Improves the quality of the EIA process Monitoring

Environmental Report (art. 5) Screening Scoping Env.Report Consultation Decision Information on decision Identify, describe and evaluate: The likely significant environmental effects of implementing the plan or programme, including: Effects on biodiversity, flora, fauna, soil, water, air, climatic factors Effects on population, human health, material assets, cultural (including architectural and archaeological) heritage, landscape The interrelationship between these factors. Monitoring

Environmental Report (2) Screening Scoping Reasonable alternatives taking into account the objectives and the geographical scope of the plan or programme Env.Report Consultation Decision The reasons for selecting the alternatives dealt with The zero option (do nothing) must also be covered Information on decision Monitoring

Environmental Report (3) Screening Scoping Env.Report Consultation Decision Outline of the P&P and relationship with other P&Ps Current state of the environment and evolution without the P&P Environmental characteristics of affected areas Environmental protection objectives, and how they were taken into account Information on decision Monitoring Mitigation measures Monitoring measures Non-technical summary

Consultations Articles 6 and 7 Screening Scoping Env. Report Consultation Decision Information on decision WHO is consulted? Environmental authorities The public Transboundary consultations ON WHAT? on the draft plan/programme on the environmental report WHY? Improve the quality Ensure transparency acceptance Monitoring

Consultations Consultations have to: Be carried out at an early stage Give an effective opportunity for the consulted parties to express their opinion Be organised within a sufficient time frame Consultations need to be take place before the adoption of the P&P

Decision (art. 8) Screening Scoping Env. Report Consultation Decision Information on decision The competent authorities must take account of: Environmental report Opinions expressed pursuant to the consultation (public, environmental authorities) Results of any transboundary consultation Monitoring

Information on the final decision Article 9 Screening Scoping Env. Report To whom? Environmental authorities Public Transboundary consultations (if consulted) Consultation Decision Information on decision Information made available Adopted plan/programme. How environmental report and results of consultations have been taken into account. Reasons for choosing between alternatives. Monitoring measures. Monitoring

Monitoring Article 10 Screening Scoping Member States have to monitor the significant environmental effects of the implementation of the plan/programme in order to: Env. Report Consultation Decision Information on decision identify at an early stage unforeseen adverse effects be able to undertake remedial action Existing monitoring arrangements may be used Monitoring measures must be covered in the SEA Report Monitoring

SEA and the new Regulations Does SEA applies? Plans and programmes co-financed by the European Community are included in the scope of the SEA Directive (art. 2) SEA will be applicable to P&P drawn up under the new Regulations as to any other plan and programme The ex ante evaluation shall incorporate, where appropriate, the requirements of the Strategic Environmental Assessment set out in implementation of Directive 2011/42/EC.. (art. 48(4))

SEA and the new Regulations Plans and programmes co-financed under new Regulations will have to be checked against the Directive s «tests» (Art. 2, definition of P&P and Art. 3, scope) Verify if the individual OPs meet the requirements foreseen by the directive, If they meet the requirements, they have to be subject to an SEA, If an SEA is carried out, ensure: quality of the report, consultations, decision making, monitoring.

Lessons learnt from the past programming period

GENERAL ISSUES Timing: SEA carried out late in the planning process. - When too late, the content of the OPs were clearly not influenced by the SEA. - Parallel development of OP & SEA = ensures that environment is taken into account - Consider review of OP if SEA demonstrated negative environmental effects Justification for no SEA or for screening is needed Some minimalistic SEA procedures, others ambitious In some cases SEA procedure not finished when submitting OP

ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT Quality of the environmental reports varied considerably among MS, and in some cases relatively poor. Report does not cover all issues in Annex I (particularly alternatives; zero option) Parts of the OP not covered by SEA procedure (indicative list of major projects) Impacts not always quantified Insufficient consideration of Natura2000 sites given heavy infrastructural measures of programme

NON TECHNICAL SUMMARIES Often poor quality - not giving the info laid down in Annex I Sometimes just sign posting go to page X Some cases no NTS at public consultation No consideration of alternatives

CONSULTATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORITIES Env. Authorities were involved in the decisionmaking process, however Some complaints that Env. Authorities were not consulted on the content and/or results of SEA process Not always clear if views of Env. Auth. were taken into account

PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS Timeframes differ between MSs, sometime not sufficient In some MSs limited participation. Very narrow interpretation of "public" 3 stakeholder organisations Often consultation only posted on web Consultation must be on both SEA report + NTS and OP Awareness raising needed for the public in general Limited consultation time period 2 weeks Structured consultation approach: Setting up of consultation group with all relevant stakeholders that met regularly

ARTICLE 9 STATEMENT No statement / to be issued later Often vague and general Need to review the OPs to take into account the SEA Statement not always covers all information required (consultations, integration and alternatives)

MONITORING Monitoring measures absent or not clearly identified, insufficient indicators Indicators measuring impact on CC (some MS carbon neutrality )

Sources of information EIA / SEA Homepage: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/home.htm Guidance on the implementation of the SEA Directive Studies and reports on the implementation of the EIA/SEA Directives GRDP Handbook on SEA for Cohesion Policy 2007-2013 (Interreg IIIC, GRDP greening regional development programmes) http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/working/doc/sea_han dbook_final_foreword.pdf