Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering

Similar documents
Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering

Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus

2009 Computer Networking & Service Tech Summary Report

Cooperative Education Program and Placement Office

STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer.

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages:

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY

SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages.

The degree is accredited by the Actuarial Profession and its structure mirrors that of the professional body qualifications.

RESIDENCE REVIEW BOARD NEW ZEALAND

University of Detroit Mercy College of Engineering and Science Department of Mathematics and Computer Science

Actuarial Science, M.S.

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO HOUSE BILL 3508

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010

INTRODUCTION. ASSAf report (2010): In 2007 SA produced 1274 PhD graduates or 26 per million of population

Business. Associate in Science in Business Administration for Transfer (ADT: A.S.-T)

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009

B-CU Graduate Exit Survey Spring Spring 2015 Report

General Faculty Meeting January Brigham Young University Idaho

Planning and Assessment Manual. Institutional Research & Effectiveness

TEK GRADUATE SURVEY 2018 RESULTS

Assessment Report for GPC. The College Assessment Committee, HCoB March 2010

Florida State College at Jacksonville Jacksonville, Florida

Alabama A & M University Student Academic Program Assessment Environmental Science

Information Services Response Rate: 99%

Learning Objective. To differentiate the branches of accounting and explain the kind or type of services rendered in each of these branches

Cumulative Count and Percent CampusClimate

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY

A GUIDE TO A CAREER AS AN ACTUARY

MBA.COM REGISTRANTS SURVEY 2003 REPORT BY AGE GROUPS BY GRADUATE MANAGEMENT ADMISSION COUNCIL (GMAC )

Pueblo Community College and 2010 Colorado Community College System (CCCS) Climate Surveys. Office of Institutional Research.

A GUIDE TO A CAREER AS AN ACTUARY

What can I do with a Major in Math?

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

Centers of Actuarial Excellence. B-Level Criteria Guidance Updated February 23, 2018

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

OFFICE STAFF POSITION

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Northeastern Ohio Actuarial Collaboration. Thomas Wakefield Youngstown State University

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT

Finance (FIN) Courses

Business Teacher Education Assessment

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University

U N I V E R S I T Y H O U S T O N S T R A T E G I C P L A N

FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY, BACHELOR OF SCIENCE (B.S.) WITH A CONCENTRATION IN ACTUARIAL SCIENCE

California State University. Memorandum of Understanding and Agreement For the Employment of University Students Who Have an Intern Credential

Strategic Budgetary Plan

City University of Hong Kong. Course Syllabus. offered by Department of Accountancy with effect from Semester A 2017/18

Internship Proposal Submission Form Master of Science Degree in Applied Marine and Watershed Science

BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT XXXVII

How Hands on Banking / El futuro en tus manos aligns with Wisconsin Education Standards.

Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time in your school.

University Accreditation Program Policy

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University

2018 Commercial Lending School

Career Opportunities. 36 Units This certificate includes courses required for immediate Intermediate Accounting - Part II...4

Special Incentive Plan for Conversion of Faculty to 9-Month Base Appointments

Assessor Response Rate: 60%

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

INTERNSHIP MASTER AGREEMENT Brigham Young University

CSU: Engaged Learning for the Real World

VISION STATEMENT EXPECTED STUDENT OUTCOMES PRINCIPLES FOR BUDGETARY DECISIONS BUDGET CALENDAR

ACCOUNTING DEGREES AND CERTIFICATES

Prisma - Employment Application

Master of Science in. Science. bu.edu/met/actuary

University of Split Department of Professional Studies CORPORATE FINANCE II COURSE SYLLABUS

Employment Ontario Information System (EOIS) Case Management System

University Program Resource

International Student Barometer

California Community Colleges

Retirement Needs and Preferences of Younger Public Workers Methodology for 2016 survey of state and local public employees

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT IN MINING ENGINEERING. Mary Poulton Head, MGE Department

P R O G R A M R E Q U I R E M E N T S

Chapter 2: Budgeting for a UTeach Program

CHICO STATE FACULTY-LED STUDY ABROAD PROGRAM TANZANIA, SUMMER 2016 PROGRAM APPLICATION

EXECUTIVE MASTER OF INSURANCE MUNICH SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

School District of Slinger Community Survey Report

SMCPS will establish, implement, and communicate timelines that comply with standards for certification of teachers who are highly qualified

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Civic Engagement Questionnaire

Senior Survey - Fall 2016

The Florida International University Budget Town Hall Discussion. March 9, 2009

Transcription:

Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1

2

Sample Population 9 Sample 7 Percent of participation 78% 3

STUDENT INFORMATION 4

10 Year Male Female Total 7 0 7 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 10 Female Male 1 5

FINANCIAL SUPPORT 6

Financial support during graduate study Financial Support Frequency Educational Loan 2 Educational Loan Individual Support 0 Individual Support 0 PR Higher Education Scholarship 3 Other 0 Total 5 PR Higher Education Scholarship 6 Frequency Other Educational Loan 4 Individual Support Educational Loan Individual Support 7

Graduate assistant position Graduate assistant position Frequency Research Assistant 1 Teaching Assistant 1 Total 2 Frequency Teaching Assistant 5 Research Assistant 5 8

TIME NOT TAKING COURSES OR WORKING ON RESEARCH PROJECT OR THESIS 9

Take time without work in your degree Not work on degree Frequency Yes 1 No 6 Frequency Yes 27% No 73% 10

PAPER ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION 11

Any paper accepted for publication Accepted Frequency Yes 0 No 6 Total 6 Frequency Yes No 10 12

ACTIVITIES 13

Key Statement A Employed 35 or more hours per week. 5 B Employed in a full-time position (six months or less) 1 C Employed less than 35 hours per week. 1 D Actively seeking full-time employment. 0 E Enrolled in an educational institution. 0 F Serving an internship required for state or professional licensing. G Voluntary unemployed. 0 H Other 0 0 14

C 14% D E F G H B 14% A 72% 15

Key Statement A Employed 35 or more hours per week. 5 B Employed in a full-time position (six months or less) 1 C Employed less than 35 hours per week. 1 D Actively seeking full-time employment. 0 E Enrolled in an educational institution. 0 F Serving an internship required for state or professional licensing. 0 G Voluntary unemployed. 0 H Other 0 16

C 14% D E F G H B 14% A 72% 17

EMPLOYMENT 18

Working Yes 7 No 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 10 No Yes 19

Job Title Frequency Computer programmer 1 IT Specialist 1 Project Coordinator 1 Senior Software Developer 1 20

Location Frequency Puerto Rico 6 United States 1 Other 0 United States 14% Frequency Other Puerto Rico 86% 21

Employer Frequency Cardinal Health 1 Gauss Research Laboratory, Inc. 1 Infotech 1 Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico 2 Sabiamed 1 22

Working Load Full Time 6 Part Time 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 14% 86% Part Time Full Time 23

The present job is related with your degree Related Yes 6 No 1 10 9 8 7 6 14% 5 4 3 2 86% No Yes 1 24

Degree Doctorate 0 Master 2 8 7 71% Bachelor 5 Some college 0 No college required 0 6 5 4 3 29% 2 1 Doctorate Master Bachelor Some college No college required 25

Salary Range $20,000 or less 0 $20,001-$25,000 0 $25,001-$30,000 0 $30,001-$35,000 1 $35,001-$40,000 2 $40,001-$45,000 1 $45,001-$50,000 1 $50,000+ 1 Total 6 26

35% 33% 3 25% 2 15% 1 5% 17% 17% 17% 17% 27

Salary Range $20,000 or less 0 $20,001-$25,000 0 $25,001-$30,000 0 $30,001-$35,000 0 $35,001-$40,000 0 $40,001-$45,000 2 $45,001-$50,000 1 $50,000+ 3 Total 6 28

5 45% 4 35% 3 25% 2 15% 1 5% 33% 17% 5 29

Organization Business or Industry 3 Government agency 1 Educational institution 2 Non-profit organization 1 Self-employed 0 Other 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 14% 29% 14% Other Self-employed Non-profit organization Educational institution 2 1 43% Government agency Business or Industry 30

Satisfaction Completely satisfied 3 Pretty satisfied 4 10 9 8 7 57% Not very satisfied 0 6 5 4 3 2 43% 1 Completely satisfied Pretty satisfied 31 Not very satisfied

To what extent do you deal that your present job contributes to attaining your career goals? Deal A great deal 5 Somewhat 1 10 9 8 14% 14% Not at all 1 7 6 5 4 3 71% Not at all Somewhat A great deal 2 1 32

Which factors assisted you in finding your present job? Legend Statement A Above average GPA 1 B Academic major 5 C Double major 1 D Competence in foreign language 0 E Competence in English 1 F Competence in mathematics 0 G Competence in computers 5 H Work experience or internship/volunteer experience 3 I An effective job search campaign 0 J Extra-curricular experiences providing skills sought by employers 2 K Personality or interpersonal skills 3 L Knowing someone who was able to influence the hiring decision 2 33 M Other 0

25% 2 22% 22% 15% 13% 13% 1 9% 9% 5% 4% 4% 4% 34 A B C D E F G H I J K L M

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES 35

Key Statement A I do not plan to go to school again 0 B Taking interesting classes 3 C Acquiring job skills 2 D Obtaining a license authorizing the practice of an occupation 2 E Obtaining a second bachelor s degree 0 F Obtaining a second master s degree 0 G Obtaining professional or doctor s degree 5 H Obtaining a Technical Certification 3 I Other 0 36

35% 33% 3 25% 2 2 2 15% 13% 13% 1 5% 37 A B C D E F G H I

Are you already admitted for further graduate study? Admitted Frequency Yes 0 No 7 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 10 No Yes 1 38

Have you passed the Fundamental Engineering Examination? 10 Year 9 2 Yes 3 No 1 Haven t take it 1 Total 5 8 7 6 5 4 2 Haven't take it No Yes 3 6 2 1 39

Have you passed the Professional Engineering Examination? 10 Year Yes 2 No 0 Haven t take it 3 Total 5 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 6 4 Haven't take it No Yes 1 40

COOP AND PLACEMENT OFFICE 41

10 Participated Yes 1 No 6 9 8 7 6 5 4 86% No Yes 3 2 1 14% 42

Taken course Yes 1 No 0 Total 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 10 No Yes 1 43

Handed over resume Yes 3 No 4 10 9 8 7 6 57% 5 4 No Yes 3 2 1 43% 44

Available Yes 4 No 3 10 9 8 7 6 43% 5 4 No Yes 3 2 1 57% 45

PROGRAM EVALUATION 46

What is your perception of the academic expectations of your program? 6 5 57% Evaluation Excellent 4 Above Average 1 4 Average 1 3 2 1 14% 14% 14% Below Average 1 Poor 0 47

How would you rate your program s performance in keeping pace with recent trends and developments in your field? 6 5 4 3 2 1 57% 43% Evaluation Excellent 4 Above Average 0 Average 3 Below Average 0 Poor 0 48

How would you rate the research opportunities your program provided to graduate students? 45% 4 35% 3 25% 2 15% 1 5% 43% 29% 29% Evaluation Excellent 3 Above Average 2 Average 2 Below Average 0 Poor 0 49

How would you rate the adequacy of facilities in your program? 6 5 57% Evaluation Excellent 4 Above Average 0 4 3 2 1 29% 14% Average 2 Below Average 1 Poor 0 50

Indicate your level of satisfaction with the supervision and guidance you received. 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 71% 14% 14% Evaluation Excellent 5 Above Average 0 Average 1 Below Average 1 Poor 0 51

What is your perception of the quality the faculty in your degree program? 45% 4 35% 3 25% 2 15% 1 5% 43% 29% 29% Evaluation Excellent 3 Above Average 2 Average 2 Below Average 0 Poor 0 52

How could you rate the overall quality of your degree Program? 6 5 57% Evaluation Excellent 4 Above Average 1 4 3 2 1 14% 29% Average 2 Below Average 0 Poor 0 53

Comments Excellent program, I will recommend it 54

GRADUATE SCHOOL EVALUATION 55

Graduate admission process 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 86% 14% Evaluation Excellent 6 Above Average 1 Average 0 Below Average 0 Poor 0 56

Graduate new-student orientation 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 71% 29% Evaluation Excellent 5 Above Average 0 Average 2 Below Average 0 Poor 0 57

Graduate School web page 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 71% 14% 14% Evaluation Excellent 5 Above Average 0 Average 1 Below Average 1 Poor 0 58

Graduation requirements 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 71% 29% Evaluation Excellent 5 Above Average 0 Average 2 Below Average 0 Poor 0 59

Comments A dedicated group with good interpersonal skills 60

LEVEL OF SATISFACTION 61

Acquiring background and specialization for further education in a professional/scientific/scholarly field Satisfaction Completely satisfied 4 Pretty satisfied 2 Not very satisfied 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 29% 57% Pretty satisfied 62

Your ability to write clearly, correctly, and effectively Satisfaction Completely satisfied 5 Pretty satisfied 2 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 29% 71% Pretty satisfied 63

Your ability to communicate effectively (verbal communication/presentation skills). Satisfaction Completely satisfied 5 Pretty satisfied 2 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 29% 71% Pretty satisfied 64

You have a comprehensive approach towards advancement in contemporary issues and engagement in continuous life long learning Satisfaction Completely satisfied 4 Pretty satisfied 3 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 43% 57% Pretty satisfied 65

You have a comprehensive understanding of fundamental principles within your major course of study /field Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 66

Your ability to reason, see relationships, raise questions, examine contrary views, and think critically Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 67

You have developed analytical thinking and problem solving Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 68

You are able to developed ideas and present them in written work Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 69

Your research/project or comprehensive exam sharpened your analytical and problem solving skills Satisfaction Completely satisfied 4 Pretty satisfied 3 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 43% 57% Pretty satisfied 70

Your research/project or comprehensive exam helped you to developed abilities to plan your own work Satisfaction Completely satisfied 5 Pretty satisfied 2 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 29% 71% Pretty satisfied 71

Your research/project or comprehensive exam was completed satisfactorily Satisfaction Completely satisfied 5 Pretty satisfied 2 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 29% 71% Pretty satisfied 72

You are confident about tackling unfamiliar tasks in industry or academia within an ethical framework Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 73

You have developed skills in the effective use of technology and library resources for life-long learning Satisfaction Completely satisfied 4 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 2 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 29% 14% 57% Pretty satisfied 74

Your ability to participate effectively as a citizen Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 75

Your ability to do university work Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 76

The effort you put into your university education Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 77

Your involvement with faculty Satisfaction Completely satisfied 4 Pretty satisfied 3 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 43% 57% Pretty satisfied 78

Your access to faculty outside of the classroom Satisfaction Completely satisfied 3 Pretty satisfied 4 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 57% 43% Pretty satisfied 79

Your major course of study Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 80

The quality of your degree program Satisfaction Completely satisfied 5 Pretty satisfied 2 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 29% 71% Pretty satisfied 81

Instruction at PUPR Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 82

Your learning opportunities outside of the classroom Satisfaction Completely satisfied 5 Pretty satisfied 2 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 29% 71% Pretty satisfied 83

The technology learning environment Satisfaction Completely satisfied 5 Pretty satisfied 2 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 29% 71% Pretty satisfied 84

The value of your PUPR education Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 85

PUPR at whole Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 86

LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH RESEARCH EXPERIENCE 87

Supervision was available when I needed it Satisfaction Completely satisfied 5 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 14% 71% Pretty satisfied 88

The thesis examination process was fair Satisfaction Completely satisfied 4 Pretty satisfied 0 Not very satisfied 0 Total 4 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 10 Pretty satisfied 89

My research further developed my problems solving skills Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 90

I had good access to the technical support I needed Satisfaction Completely satisfied 4 Pretty satisfied 2 Not very satisfied 0 Total 6 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 33% 67% Pretty satisfied 91

I learned to develop my ideas and present them in my written work Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 0 Not very satisfied 0 Total 6 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 10 Pretty satisfied 92

I understood the required standard for the thesis Satisfaction Completely satisfied 3 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 1 Total 5 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 2 2 6 Pretty satisfied 93

My supervisor(s) provided additional information relevant to my topic Satisfaction Completely satisfied 5 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 14% 71% Pretty satisfied 94

My research sharpened my analytical skills was satisfied with the thesis examination process Satisfaction Completely satisfied 4 Pretty satisfied 0 Not very satisfied 0 Total 4 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 10 Pretty satisfied 95

I was given good guidance in topic selection and refinement Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 0 Not very satisfied 0 Total 6 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 10 Pretty satisfied 96

I understood the requirements of thesis examination Satisfaction Completely satisfied 4 Pretty satisfied 0 Not very satisfied 0 Total 4 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 10 Pretty satisfied 97

Doing my research helped me to develop my ability to plan my own work Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 98

My research supervisor(s) provided helpful feedback on my progress Satisfaction Completely satisfied 5 Pretty satisfied 2 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 29% 71% Pretty satisfied 99

I received good guidance in my literature search Satisfaction Completely satisfied 5 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 14% 71% Pretty satisfied 100

The examination of my thesis was completed in a reasonable time Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 0 Not very satisfied 0 Total 6 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 10 Pretty satisfied 101

As a result of my research, I feel confident about tackling unfamiliar problems Satisfaction Completely satisfied 6 Pretty satisfied 1 Not very satisfied 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Completely satisfied Not very satisfied 14% 86% Pretty satisfied 102

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT 103

Key Statement A Full time, regular position 4 B Full time, contract/temporary position 1 C Part time 0 D Actively seeking full time employment 0 E Enrolled in an educational institution 2 F Voluntary unemployed 0 G Other 0 104

6 57% 5 4 3 29% 2 14% 1 105 A B C D E F G

If you were working before starting your graduate studies, did you obtain or will obtain career advancement opportunities as result of your graduate degree completion? Career advancement Promotion 1 Job retention 1 No change 3 Other 0 Total 5 10 9 8 7 6 6 5 4 3 2 2 1 2 Promotion Job retention No change Other 106

* California State University, Chico (n.d.) Retrieved August 30, 2012, from http://www.csuchico.edu/vpaa/wasc/docs/cpr_standard_4/cfr_4.5/grad_survey_sp 05.pdf 107