Interactive Numerical Exercise to Screen a PPP Project for Financial Feasibility

Similar documents
Interactive Numerical Exercise to Screen a PPP Project for Financial Feasibility

Group Exercise to Screen a PPP Project for Financial Feasibility

Introduction to the Toolkit Financial Models

A Financial Model to Estimate Annual Payments Required under Performance Based Contracts. Goran Mladenovic and Cesar Queiroz

Numerical Model for Financial Simulation of Highway PPP Projects User guide

Workshop on PPP in Roads and Highways

Public Private Partnership in Highway Sector in Punjab, India

F = MA : CSG SLC WEBINAR DECEMBER 16, J. Douglas Koelemay, Director

Irvine Corona Expressway Project Financing Review

Airport Master Plan for. Brown Field Municipal Airport

Public-Private Partnerships:

UAE-Russia Infrastructure & Public-Private Partnership Investment Focus. October 2014

P3 Fundamentals and Best Practices in Resource and Project Management

Comparison between new financial analysis and ECI-result (2002)

Draft PPP Policy Outline

Sharing Risk and Revenues from PPPs: Perspectives from current practice in the road sector

People s Republic of China TA 8940: Municipality-Level Public Private Partnership (PPP) Operational Framework for Chongqing

Applied Workshop on Preparing Infrastructure Projects 21 th - 25 th March Bangkok DAY 2

Model Concession Agreement for Highways: An Overview

Support Loan Concept for the Viability of a BOT Road Project

PROJECT FINANCING FOR BTO SECTION OF INCHEON BRIGE PROJECT

Guidelines For Rajasthan Infrastructure Project Development Fund (RIPDF)

PPP in Korea. Highlights on its Institutions. Director General Hyoung-Kwon, Ko. Ministry of Strategy and Finance. November 11.

Value for Money Analysis: Choosing the Best Project Delivery Method. Ken L. Smith, PE, CVS -HDR Engineering, Inc.

IPP TRANSACTION ADVISOR TERMS OF REFERENCE

Overview of the framework

Florida Transportation Commission PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (P3)

Sumant Chak MAKING PPP ATTRACTIVE FOR PRIVATE FINANCE IN INFRASTRUCTURE THE INDIA STORY. Asian Institute of Transport Development

Financing Megaprojects In The Rail Sector. Andreas Klocke, Head of KfW Regional Office, Bangkok

Preparation of the cost-benefit analysis

Challenges of Implementation of a PPP Program in Mexico

The Role of the Public and Private Sector in Transport Infrastructure

OPTIMIZATION OF ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ON SERBIAN TOLL ROADS

Norwegian Experience with Highway Concessions

Public Private Partnerships. Alberta Infrastructure Guidance Document

Project Appraisal and Selection

Financial Analysis of Public- Private Partnership (PPP) Projects in Highways

Panorama Mundial de la Conservacion de Carreteras

Training workshop PPP in health sector

Methodology for Quantitative Procurement Options Analysis Discussion Paper. Partnerships British Columbia Updated April 2014

ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Applicability of Spanish PPP experience to Russian market

RTD Board Briefing. Eagle P3 Project Draft RFP. January 6, 2009

Overview of the framework

ANNEX F THE FINANCIAL PROPOSAL

IFC Transaction Advisory Services Creating opportunity where it s needed most. From Concept Design to Project Execution

Public Private Partnerships. Gautrain Rapid Rail Link. in St Petersburg. World Bank Institute. CEO: Gautrain Management Agency

«Kekava Bypass» Case Study

World Bank Group Risk Mitigation Solutions for Myanmar s Infrastructure Projects. Workshop Program

T o o l k i t f o r P u b l i c - P r i v a t e P a r t n e r s h i p s i n r o a d s & H i g h w a y s. Advantages of PPP

Alternative ways of Financing Urban Development

Integrated Capital Planning Manual

Albania. Restructuring Public Expenditure to Sustain Growth. Public Expenditure and Institutional Review. Sector related presentations-transport

Success story: Slovak D4 R7 PPP & lessons learnt for Czech PPPs

The Future: What s in Store for the Next Generation?

RF Law on Concessions and prospects for private-public partnership infrastructure projects in Russia

Experience of Implementing Transportation PPPs in India. Abhijit Bhaumik August 6, 2015

XII. Public Private Partnerships for Public Transport Investments

in Developing Countries in FY2010 Access Road in Republic of Indonesia SUMMARY March 2011

Value for Money Test in Korea

Project Appraisal Guidelines

Fredric W. Kessler, Esq.

Intro Public-Private Partnership (P3) Finance Course

Equitable Financial Evaluation Method for Public-Private Partnership Projects *

GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITY. A partnership platform for greater investment in the infrastructure of emerging markets and developing economies

Public Private Partnerships, The Rules Oranjestad February 18, Paul Swanenvleugel

Keynote speech An International Evaluation of PPP Models for Roads

India: Public Private Partnerships in Highways Sector

Executive Summary: Review Result of Jakarta MRT Project

DOCUMENT OF THE EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR CROATIA: REPORT ON THE INVITATION TO THE PUBLIC TO COMMENT

Problems and Prospects of Public Private Partnership in Bangladesh

Risk Mitigation Strategy for Infrastructure Projects

E.WA.R.U. Efficient WAter Resource Use ANNEX N.8 PROJECT FINANCING DRAFT REPORT

Project Appraisal Guidelines

LOCAL MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM

Czech D4 Highway PPP Project

GUIDELINES FOR FORMULATION, APPRAISAL AND APPROVAL OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) PROJECTS

PPP Policies, Performances & Prospects of the Republic of Korea

AGENDA ITEM #9 SUMMARY

Project financing: guidelines & best practices

Private Participation in Infrastructure in Korea

Developing a PPP market: Getting the fundamentals right

Guidelines for Formulation, Appraisal and Approval of

Feasibility study. Lecture 4. 7/15/2014 Dr. Joshua Onono

Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) Projects

PPPs in Brazil: a brief overview

BUCHAREST BRASOV MOTORWAY COMARNIC-BRASOV (CRISTIAN) SECTION

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: AB3202 Project Name. Kenya Nairobi Urban Toll Road PRG Region

Selecting the Right Projects / Sectors for PPP Implementation

Project Economic and Financial Appraisal & Risk Analysis: A focus on GCF Funding Proposal

Yanino Waste Processing Plant City of St. Petersburg

Project Development Under PPPs

Public Disclosure Authorized CONFORMED COPY LOAN NUMBER 1236 IND. Public Disclosure Authorized LOAN AGREEMENT. (Fourth Highway Project)

Private Sector Participation in Highways Some Insights

MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS

URBAN TRANSPORT Funding and Financing solutions of the European Investment Bank

Gautrain Rapid Rail Link - A Public Private Partnership Development Model

Study of High Speed Rail in Alberta

Seminar on African Electrical Interconnection. Module 6 - Financing Interconnection Projects

Public Private Partnership in Turkey

Transcription:

World Bank Workshop on the Toolkit for PPP in Roads and Highways Interactive Numerical Exercise to Screen a PPP Project for Financial Feasibility Cesar Queiroz Consultant and former Highways Adviser Moscow, Russia June 7, 2011

Workshop Numerical Exercise This practical session will provide participants with an opportunity to learn how to use the graphical and numerical financial simulation models of the Toolkit for PPP in Roads and Highways Following completion of the exercise, the participants should be able to work on several PPP issues, such as the main factors defining the minimum toll rate (or minimum availability payment) required for a PPP project to attract private investors

Instructions to Participants Please form teams with a few members each Teams will be numbered 1 to n Each team will be given basic data (or assumptions) for a proposed PPP project and will be asked questions on the financial assessment of the project Please choose the team member who will make a brief presentation of your team s results, after deliberations Please assume that previous studies have shown that the project is economically justified, and socially and environmentally sound

Basic data (or assumptions) to be used by each team Concession term: 30 years Construction Cost: US$210 million Road length: 40 km Four-year construction, with progress rates: Year 1: 15%; Year 2: 30%; Year 3: 30%; Year 4: 25% Operating expenses: $10 million per year (at opening year); no variable operating expenses Capital structure: Equity, 30%; Subsidies, 0% Nominal interest rate: 9% per year Loan grace period: 4 years Loan repayment period: 15 years Discount rate (real terms): 8%

Basic data to be used (cont d) Initial daily traffic (opening year), vehicles/day: Group x: AADT = 7,500 + 2,500x, where x is the team number Traffic composition: cars, 70%; trucks, 25%; and buses, 5% Traffic growth: 3% per year Inflation: 4% per year Tax rate, VAT: 10%; Corporate tax: 11% Link to the Financial Model Link http://ppiaf.org/documents/toolkits/highwaystoolkit/6/fi nancial_models/index.html

Financial Indicator Targets (or Constraints) Please assume that the following targets will have to be met for the project to attract private sponsors: Project Financial Internal Rate of Return: FIRR 12% Equity Internal Rate of Return (or Return on Equity): ROE 14% Annual Debt Service Cover Ratio: ADSCR 1.2

Questions to each team 1. Please estimate the minimum toll rate per average vehicle, in (a) $/veh, and (b) $/veh-km, for the project to be able to attract private investors. Note: The minimum toll rate ($/veh) can be obtained by trial and error using the Cash Flow sheet of the graphical financial simulation model (or the Assumptions sheet of the numerical model) of the Toolkit. After you have entered all the data applicable to your specific project, you can vary the toll rate so the financial indicators calculated by the model are just above the minimum required threshold.

Questions to each team (cont d) 2. Please estimate the minimum car, truck and bus toll rates, in (a) $/veh, and (b) $/veh-km, for the project to be able to attract private sponsors. Please assume the following relationships between toll rates for different type of vehicles: Average truck toll rate = 3 x car toll rate Average bus toll rate = 2 x car toll rate The toll rate in the graphical model (WATR) is: WATR = (%C x TRc + %T x TRt + %B x TRb) / 100 where WATR is the weighted average toll rate per vehicle; %C, %T, and %B are the percentages of cars, trucks, and buses in the traffic flow; TRc, TRt, and TRb are the toll rates for cars, trucks, and buses

Questions to each team (cont d) 3. Closing the affordability gap with government subsidies. If the toll rates estimated under Question 2 are above road users affordability (or willingness to pay), you may want to consider using government subsidies to reduce the toll rate required to attract private investors. Assuming that the Government is willing to contribute up to 25% of the construction cost (i.e., subsidies), please estimate the minimum required toll rate per average vehicle (in $/vehkm) that would be sufficient to attract private sponsors.

Notes regarding the solution to Question 3 (a) Changing the amount of Subsidies does not change the project s financial Internal Rate of Return (IRR), which is independent of the project s capital structure. Please disregard the minimum IRR requirement in this case. (b) A minimum amount of equity is usually specified to make sure the private sponsors have their skin in the game. Equity, in this example, is required to be not less than 30% (see slide no. 4). The sum of Equity, Loans and Subsidies is 100 percent. Consequently, the maximum amount of Subsidies that could be considered in this case is 70%.

Questions to each team (cont d) 4. Using the toll rate computed under Question 1, what is the amount of subsidy that the government could provide for the project to be fiscally neutral to the government? 5. How does the project financial internal rate of return (IRR) vary with the amount of subsidies? Is IRR independent from the capital structure (i.e., proportion of subsidies, equity, and credit)? 6. Is the return on equity (ROE) directly influenced by subsidies? Ceteris paribus, what would be the impact on ROE of an increase in subsidies from 0 to 10%?

Questions to each team (cont d) 7. In case there is no political support to charge actual tolls to road users, alternative approaches could include shadow tolls or availability fees. Assuming that there will be no capital grants (i.e., no subsidies during construction), please estimate the minimum annual required payment by the government (availability fee, or availability payment, or annuity) during the first year of operation. Please use the result from Question 1a in your calculations. Note: Availability payment = 365 * AADT * WATR 8. What financial criterion (or criteria) would you include in the bidding documents, so as to allow for an objective evaluation of financial proposals under a competitive selection of concessionaires?

Questions to each team (cont d) 9. Bridging the affordability gap with shadow tolls. In case the toll rates estimated under Question 2 are higher than the affordable toll rates in Russia (or in your province), the Government may want to consider providing a shadow toll payment to the concessionaire, so the actual toll rates can be kept within the road users affordability. Assuming that the maximum affordable toll rate is $0.04/carkm, and that there will be no capital grants (i.e., zero subsidies), please estimate the shadow toll payment by the government during the first year of operation, so as to complement the affordable toll rates.

Notes regarding Question 9 (a) Please use the information and results from Questions 1 and 2, as appropriate. (b) Affordable weighted average toll rate per vehicle (WATRa): WATRa = (%C x TRca + %T x TRta + %B x TRba) / 100 where %C, %T, and %B are the percentages of cars, trucks and buses in the traffic flow; TRca, TRta, and TRba are the affordable toll rates for cars, trucks, and buses, respectively. Note: TRca = 40 x 0.04 = $1.60/car (c) Annual shadow toll payment (ASTP): ASTP = 365 * AADT * (WATRr WATRa) where WATRr is the required weighted average toll rate per vehicle as computed under Question 1a. The units of WATRr and WATRa should be $/veh. (d) Payment of an ASTP by the government is somewhat similar to a minimum revenue guarantee.

Questions to each team (cont d) 10.Time permitting, please work with the numerical financial simulation model to answer the above questions. In your view, what are the pros and cons of the two models? 11.Module 5 of the Toolkit for PPP in Roads and Highways describes the five key stages to launch a PPP project. In which one (or ones) of these stages do you think it may be necessary to carry out a financial assessment of the project? http://ppiaf.org/documents/toolkits/highwaystoolkit/5/index.html

Questions to each team (cont d) 12.Several assumptions have been made to run this numerical application of the Toolkit financial simulation models. Please describe the changes in assumptions that you would suggest to make this exercise more realistic for Russia (or your province). 13.Toll rates (or availability fees) are a complex issue. The toll rate that will actually be charged to road users depends on many factors, such as the degree of competition, expected and actual traffic volume and composition, loan terms, government support (if any). Please discuss.

Questions to each team (cont d) 14.Please make a brief presentation summarizing your team s results and discussions. Please focus your presentation on the non-numerical questions. Good luck!

Questions to focus on, in case of time constraints Questions 1 to 3 Question 7 Question 9 Questions 11 to 14

Main Stages to Launch a PPP Project Stage 1: Identification, Prioritization and Selection of the PPP Project Stage 2: Due Diligence and Feasibility Studies: includes activities and studies to ensure the selected project is well designed and can be successfully tendered and implemented Stage 3: Procurement: includes prequalification of bidders and the bidding and bid evaluation process Stage 4: Contract Award: includes dealing with the preferred bidder(s), financial close Stage 5: Contract Management: deals with the construction and operation periods of a project including transfer back if relevant

Making Predictions It's hard to make predictions - especially about the future. Attributed to many people, including Yogi Berra, Niels Bohr, Samuel Goldwyn, Robert Storm Petersen, and Mark Twain Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible. Lord Kelvin, British mathematician and physicist, president of the British Royal Society, 1895

Cesar Queiroz Consultant, former Highways Adviser World Bank Tel +1 202-473 8053 Cell +1 301 755 7591 queiroz.cesar@gmail.com