On behalf of the Respondents, Shri Dinesh Kumar S. Parmar, Deputy Zonal
|
|
- Roxanne Phelps
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section (19) Date of first hearing Date of first order Date of second hearing Date of second order Date of third hearing Date of final order : : : : : : 13th February th February rd April rd April ST May st May 2017 Name of the Appellant : SHRI CHAYAN GHOSH CHOWDHURY Name of the Public Authority/Respondent : CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, DENA BANK ZONAL OFFICE, 1ST FLOOR, PRAVEEN HOUSE, 28-A, VIDHAN SABHA MARG, LUCKNOW, UP RTI Application filed on : 28/08/2015 CPIO replied on : 28/09/2015 First Appeal filed on : 05/10/2015 First Appellate Authority order on : 09/11/ nd Appeal received on : 03/12/2015 Attendance during the hearing on The Appellant was present in person. No one was present on behalf of the Respondents. Attendance during the hearing on The Appellant was present in person. On behalf of the Respondents, Shri Dinesh Kumar S. Parmar, Deputy Zonal
2 Manager and CPIO was present at the NIC Studio, Lucknow. Attendance during the hearing on The Appellant was present in person. On behalf of the Respondents, Shri Dinesh Kumar S. Parmar, Deputy Zonal Manager and CPIO and Shri Achal Gupta, former CPIO were present at the NIC Studio, Lucknow. Information Commissioner : Shri Sharat Sabharwal Information sought This matter concerns an RTI application filed by the Appellant, seeking information on seven points regarding the representation received from the All India Dena Bank SC/ST/OBC Employees Federation regarding unauthorised temporary persons empanelled in the Zonal Office, Lucknow and related issues. The CPIO reply The CPIO responded point wise to the RTI application and stated, inter alia, that no representation had been received from the above mentioned federation and the Zonal Office had no list of the unauthorised persons empanelled. Grounds of the First Appeal Not satisfied with the CPIO s reply. Order of the First Appellate Authority The FAA stated that the information had already been provided to the Appellant. Grounds of the Second Appeal Not satisfied with the information provided by the Respondents. Relevant facts emerging during the Hearing, Discussion and Decision
3 Hearing on The Appellant stated that the queries of his RTI application were regarding the representation received from the All India Dena Bank SC/ST/OBC Employees Federation concerning unauthorised temporary persons empanelled in the Zonal Office, Lucknow. The CPIO stated that no such representation had been received and no letter had been issued by the bank to recognise the above mentioned federation. He also stated that the Zonal Office in Lucknow had no list of unauthorised persons empanelled. The Appellant made the following submissions regarding the reply of the CPIO, upheld by the FAA:- (i) He had sought a personal hearing from the FAA, which was not granted. (In this context, we note that the Commission is in favour of grant of hearing by FAAs in cases where such hearing is sought by an Appellant). (ii) Even though as per their website, the bank has a First Appellate Authority based at Lucknow, in the CPIO s reply dated , he was given the name and address of the FAA at New Delhi. The Appellant claimed that this was done to harass him and when he filed an appeal to the FAA in New Delhi, it was sent by him to the FAA in Lucknow. (iii) In an affidavit filed in the Allahabad High Court by Shri Shri Niwas Pathak, Senior Manager of the bank in the Lucknow Zonal Office in Dena Bank Staff Association and Anr. vs. Chairman & Managing Director & Ors. [W.P. No. 2970(S/S) of 2015], the bank stated the following:-
4 That the Respondent Bank received a representation from All India Dena Bank SC/ST/OBC Employees Federation that unauthorized temporary persons were empanelled in Zonal Office (ZO), Lucknow. In the light of the said representation and after the due diligence the order dated 21/5/2015 bearing reference no. LZO/PER/929/2015 issued for the discontinuance of the services of the persons engaged in the branches of Lucknow and Dehradun Zone on temporary basis. The Appellant argued that in view of the above affidavit filed by the bank, the information provided to him by the CPIO and upheld by the FAA is false. 2. In the light of the foregoing, the Appellant prayed for direction to the Respondents to provide the correct and complete information sought by him, penal action against the CPIO and award of compensation to him in view of the harassment caused to him because of denial of information by the CPIO without any reasonable ground and without citing any section of the RTI Act. 3. The Respondents were not present in spite of a written notice having been sent to them. We take a serious note of their absence during the hearing, which has forced us to adjourn this matter. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to be heard again on 3 rd April 2017 at a.m. through video-conferencing. We direct the CPIO to be present himself at the next hearing to state the position of the bank in response to the above submissions made by the Appellant. The venue for videoconferencing for the hearing on will be as follows:- For the Appellant and the Respondents
5 NIC Video Conferencing Studio, Room No. 110, 1 st Floor, Yojana Bhawan, No. 9, Sarojini Naidu Marg, Lucknow (U.P.) (Contact Officer: Shri Diwan Singh (Scientist-D) contact No. : / / ) Hearing on The matter came up again today. At the outset of the hearing, we asked the Respondents to make their submissions regarding certain issues raised by the Appellant during the hearing on and mentioned in our interim order of the same date. With regard to paragraph 1 (ii) of the interim order, the Respondents claimed that there was no First Appellate Authority based in Lucknow as the Zonal Head was an officer of the level of AGM. Since the DGM level officer and First Appellate Authority was based at Delhi, the CPIO, in his reply dated , asked the Appellant to file an appeal to the FAA at Delhi. However, subsequently an officer at the level of DGM was appointed at Lucknow and, therefore, the appeal was sent by the FAA at Delhi to the DGM / FAA at Lucknow for necessary action. The Appellant submitted that the website of the Respondents, as on the date of the CPIO s reply ( ), showed that there was an FAA based at Lucknow. The representative of the Respondents, however, reiterated their above submission. In view of the foregoing, Shri Dinesh Kumar S. Paramar, CPIO is directed to file a sworn affidavit to the Commission, with a copy to the Appellant, stating that no First Appellate Authority was based at Lucknow as on the date of the CPIO s reply ( ) and indicting the subsequent date, w.e.f. from which a First Appellate Authority was designated at Lucknow. The CPIO should comply with our above directive, within
6 fifteen days of the receipt of this order, under intimation to the Commission. 5. With regard to the aspect of furnishing of information, the Respondents stated that no representation from the All India Dena Bank SC/ST/OBC Employees Federation was received by the Zonal Office. It might have been received by the Head Office. The CMD of the bank was party to the case concerning the matter, which went to a court. Therefore, the case was contested from the Head Office and they would have authorised an officer of the Zonal Office to file the affidavit mentioned above. The Appellant stated that since the services of 104 officials of the bank were dispensed with on the basis of the complaint made by the above Federation, the Zonal Office cannot claim that it did not have any information to provide in response to the various queries of his RTI application. He further submitted that with regard to point No. 7 of the application, the CPIO has informed him that the guidelines of DOPT, mentioned therein, were being followed, but has not given the details of the manner in which these guidelines are being followed. The Respondents stated that the Appellant was not a party to the court case and the court has upheld the decision of the bank to dispense with the services of 104 employees. They further submitted that all the relevant information was provided to the court, but were unable to confirm, in response to our query, whether copy of any complaint filed by the All India Dena Bank SC/ST/OBC Employees Federation was provided to the court or not. In response to our query, the Appellant stated that since the services of a number of employees were dispensed with on the basis of a complaint made by the above mentioned Federation, he is entitled to receive a copy of the complaint and the information concerning the Federation, sought at points No. 2 and 3 of the RTI application. The
7 Appellant also submitted that he has made two visits to Delhi to be present in person for the hearings. He was informed that on both the occasions, the Commission had made arrangements for him to appear at the NIC Studio, Lucknow. However, he had chosen to visit Delhi for the purpose. He was further informed that the fact of his having visited Delhi for the two hearings would have no impact whatsoever on the decision of the Commission, which would be based on the submissions made by the parties. 6. We have considered the submissions of both the parties and are not convinced by the submission made by the Respondents that the Zonal Office had no information whatsoever to provide in response to the queries of the RTI application. Firstly, it has not been denied by the Respondents that an affidavit was filed in the Allahabad High Court by a Senior Manager of the Lucknow Zonal Office. Even if it is assumed that the affidavit was filed under instructions from the Head Office, the fact remains that some information concerning the issue was available in the Zonal Office. Further, since the services of 104 employees under the Lucknow Zonal Office were dispensed with, the Zonal Office cannot take the plea that no information on the issue was available in that office on the date of the CPIO s reply. Moreover, an RTI application is filed to a public authority and not to a particular office of the public authority. Therefore, even if some information was / might have been available at the Head Office, the CPIO at Lucknow should have checked the position with the Head Office before responding to it. In the light of the foregoing, the reply dated of the CPIO appears, prima-facie, to be a misleading reply. Therefore, this matter is adjourned to be heard again on 31 st May 2017 at a.m. through video-
8 conferencing. Shri Dinesh Kumar S. Parmar, CPIO is directed to be present for the next hearing along with the officer, who responded to the RTI application as CPIO on The officer, who was CPIO on , would be required to show cause during the next hearing on as to why he should not be penalised under Section 20 (1) of the RTI Act for his having given a prima-facie misleading reply to the RTI application dated Further, since the information sought at points No. 1 to 3 of the RTI application relates to or has been provided by the All India Dena Bank SC/ST/OBC Employees Federation, we would like to give an opportunity to them to make their submissions, if any, before a decision is taken regarding disclosure of the information sought at these points. Accordingly, the CPIO is directed to forward, immediately on its receipt, a copy of this interim order, along with copies of the following documents, by registered post AD, to the All India Dena Bank SC/ST/OBC Employees Federation:- (i) RTI application dated (ii) CPIO s reply dated (iii) (iv) (v) Appeal dated to the First Appellate Authority. Order dated of the First Appellate Authority. Appeal dated of the Appellant to the Commission (copy enclosed). The All India Dena Bank SC/ST/OBC Employees Federation should be represented at the next hearing on in case they wish to make any submissions in the matter.
9 8. Notwithstanding the above, there is no ground whatsoever to deny the information sought by the Appellant at points No. 4 to 7 of his RTI application. Therefore, the CPIO is directed to provide this information to the Appellant, free of charge, within thirty days of the receipt of this order, under intimation to the Commission. With regard to point No. 7, the CPIO should provide to the appellant copy(ies) of the bank s circular(s)/ order(s) vide which the DOPT guidelines, mentioned therein, were complied with. 9. A decision on the Appellant s request for compensation will be taken in the light of the submissions made during the next hearing. 10. The venue for video-conferencing for the parties for the next hearing on will be as follows:- For the Appellant, the Respondents and the All India Dena Bank SC/ST/OBC Employees Federation NIC Video Conferencing, E- Floor, Yojana Bhavan, No.-9, Sarojini Naidu Marg, Lucknow , (Contact Officer Mr. Diwan Singh, Scientist-D & Contact Nos.: / / Hearing on The matter came up again today. 12. The Respondents stated that as directed by the Commission in paragraph 7 of the interim order dated , the necessary documents were forwarded to the All
10 India Dena Bank SC /ST/OBC Employees Federation, Mumbai. However, no one was present during the hearing to represent them. The Respondents further submitted that the CPIO has filed a sworn affidavit dated in keeping with the Commission s direction in paragraph 4 of the interim order regarding the issue of the First Appellate Authority. In this affidavit, the CPIO has stated that no Appellate Authority was based at Lucknow as on the date of the former CPIO s reply dated and a First Appellate Authority was designated at Lucknow on The Appellant questioned the above affidavit of the CPIO and stated that as per the website of the Respondents, there was a First Appellate Authority based at Lucknow at that stage. The Respondents stated that the Zonal Manager at Lucknow was of the level of AGM and was upgraded to the level of DGM on , when he was designated as the First Appellate Authority at Lucknow. We have considered the submissions of both the parties and have no reason to doubt the categorical statement made by the CPIO in his affidavit. Therefore, we would not pursue this issue any further. 13. With regard to the directions contained in paragraph 8 of the interim order of the Commission, the CPIO stated that a reply was sent on points No. 4 to 7 to the Appellant on The Appellant stated that the information sought by him has not been provided. At point No. 4, the Appellant had sought information regarding the list of unauthorised persons empanelled in the Zonal Office Lucknow along with date of empanelment and their present place of posting. The CPIO had stated in his reply dated that no such list was maintained by the Zonal Office. The Appellant stated that in the affidavit filed to the Allahabad High Court [reference
11 paragraph 1 (iii)] above, it was stated that an order dated was issued for the discontinuance of the services of the persons engaged in the branches of Lucknow and Dehradun zone on temporary basis. In response to our query, the Respondents stated that there were no unauthorized persons empanelled in the Zonal Office and the information concerning the employees, whose services were dispensed with, is scattered in various branches as such appointments were made there. With reference to points No. 4 and 5 of the RTI application, we direct the CPIO to compile a list of such employees, whose services were dispensed with, by getting the information from the branches and provide it to the Appellant. While providing the name of each such employee, the CPIO should also provide the name and designation of the officer, who had made the initial appointment of the employee concerned, to the extent that such information is available on the records of the branches. We would not like to burden the public authority with the task of collecting the information from the branches in response to point No. 6, thereby disproportionately diverting their resources from their day to day work. Regarding point No. 7, the CPIO had stated that the bank was complying with the government s directives contained in the DOPT circular No. 1/1/2013-IR dated However, during the hearing, he stated that only the RTI applications seeking the information, which is sought most often, are placed on the website of the Respondents. We direct the CPIO to bring the contents of the above circular of DOPT to the notice of the Zonal Head. The Commission directs the Respondents to comply fully with the directions contained in the above circular. 14. As regards points No. 1 to 3 of the RTI application, the Respondents stated that the All India Dena Bank SC/ ST/OBC Employees Federation had made their
12 representation to the Head Office and they have got the information on points No. 1 and 3 from the Head Office. Regarding point No. 2, they stated that only trade unions are recognised by the Head Office of the bank. Since the above organization is an employees federation, no such recognition was required in their case. We see no ground for denial of the information sought by the Appellant at points No. 1 and 3, to the extent available in the records of the bank and the CPIO should provide it to him. As regards point No. 2, the CPIO should explain the position concerning the recognition aspect to the Appellant in writing. 15. The CPIO should comply with our above directives regarding provision of additional information to the Appellant, within ten days of the receipt of this order (points No. 1 to 3) and within thirty days of the receipt of this order (points No. 4 and 5), under intimation to the Commission. The information should be provided free of charge. 16. Explaining his reply dated , Shri Achal Gupta, former CPIO stated that the representation of the All India Dena Bank SC/ ST/ OBC Employees Federation was received by the Head Office and as stated by the Respondents earlier, the case at the Allahabad High Court was contested from the Head Office and the affidavit mentioned at paragraph 1 (iii) was filed by the Legal Officer under directions from the Head Office. Therefore, he was not aware of either the representation or the affidavit filed at the court, which resulted in his reply dated The Appellant stated that this response of the former CPIO is an afterthought and he deliberately gave a wrong reply. As stated in paragraph 6 of our interim order, if the CPIO had checked the position with the Head Office or from all concerned in the Zonal Office, he could
13 have provided the correct picture to the Appellant. One could understand to some extent his not checking with the Head Office as he might not have been aware of the location of the information in that office. However, his checking the position with the legal officials in the zonal office would have enabled him to give a correct reply. It is, therefore, clear that the CPIO s reply dated was not given after a serious application of mind and due diligence. However, there is nothing on record to establish that the reply of the CPIO was the result of any malafide intent. In this connection, we note the following observations made by the High Court of Delhi in its judgment dated in Bhagat Singh vs Chief Information Commissioner & Ors. [W.P.(C) No / 2007]:- 17. This Court takes a serious note of the two year delay in releasing information, the lack of adequate reasoning in the orders of the Public Information Officer and the Appellate Authority and the lack of application of mind in relation to the nature of information sought. The materials on record clearly show the lackadaisical approach of the second and third respondent in releasing the information sought. However, the Petitioner has not been able to demonstrate that they malafidely denied the information sought. Therefore, a direction to the Central Information Commission to initiate action under Section 20 of the Act, cannot be issued. 17. In the light of the foregoing, we would refrain from proceeding with penal action against the CPIO. At the same time, it is clear that the manner in which the RTI application was handled by the Respondents caused a great deal of harassment to the Appellant to get the information desired by him and to follow the process through various stages of appeals. It is difficult to quantify such harassment caused to an applicant in monetary terms. However, by virtue of the power vested in us under
14 Section 19 (8) (b) of the RTI Act, we direct the Respondents to pay a token compensation of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand only) to the Appellant. The CPIO should ensure that the above compensation is paid to the Appellant, within fifteen days of the receipt of this order, under intimation to the Commission. 18. With the above directions and observations, the appeal is disposed of. 19. Copies of this order be given free of cost to the parties. Copy to:- Sd/- (Sharat Sabharwal) Information Commissioner Shri Girish Charaniya General Secretary, All India Dena Bank SC/ST/OBC Federation, Dena Bank, RAPC, Burjor Baug, First Floor, LBS Marg, Bhandup (West), Mumbai Shri Suresh C. Buntolia, Zonal Manager, Dena Bank, Zonal Office, 28 A, Pravin House, Vidhan Sabha Marg, Lucknow Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this Commission. (R. L. Gupta) Deputy Registrar
On behalf of the Respondents, Shri Manoj Jain, GM was present at the NIC Studio, Mumbai.
Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/002007 Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section (19) Date of hearing Date of decision : : 14th December 2016 14th December 2016 Name
More informationThe Appellant was present at the NIC Studio, Rohtak.
Central Information Commission, New Delhi (Two Same Cases) Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section (19) Date of hearing Date of decision : : 10th January 2017 10th January 2017 Name of the Appellant
More informationThe Appellant was present at the NIC Studio, Kolkata.
Central Information Commission, New Delhi Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section (19) Date of hearing Date of decision : : 17 th November 2016 23 rd November 2016 Name of the Appellant : SHRI ANIL
More informationThe Appellant was present at the NIC Studio, Bhilwara.
Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. CIC/SH/A/2016/000521 File No. CIC/SH/A/2016/000739 File No. CIC/SH/A/2016/001056 File No. CIC/SH/A/2016/000803 File No. CIC/SH/A/2016/001067 Right to
More informationOn behalf of the Respondents, the following were present in person:- These files contain four appeals and one complaint in respect of the RTI
Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/002325 File No. CIC/SH/C/2015/000459 File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/002156 File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/002329 Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section
More informationCentral Information Commission, New Delhi
Central Information Commission, New Delhi FileNos. CIC/LS/A/2013/000954/SH, CIC/LS/A/2013/000955/SH, CIC/LS/A/2013/000956/SH, CIC/LS/A/2013/000957/SH, CIC/LS/A/2013/000958/SH, CIC/LS/A/2013/000959/SH,
More informationक यस चन आय ग CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION ब ब ग ग न थ म ग
क यस चन आय ग CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION ब ब ग ग न थ म ग Baba Gangnath Marg, म नरक, नईदल -110067 Munirka, New Delhi-110067 Tel: 011-26182593/26182594 Email: registryicab@gmail.com File No.: CIC/RAILB/A/2017/146935
More informationCentral Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi website-cic.gov.
Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 website-cic.gov.in Appeal Nos. CIC/SH/A/2016/000299/MP, CIC/MP/A/2016/000096, CIC/MP/A/2016/000348,
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August KrantiBhawan, BhikajiCama Place, New Delhi Tel :
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August KrantiBhawan, BhikajiCama Place, New Delhi -110066 Tel : +91-11-26186535 Appeal No. CIC/SA/A/2016/000543 Appellant: Respondent: Mrs. Anita Chhabra,
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi Tel :
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi -110067 Tel : +91-11-26717355 Appeal No. CIC/VS/A/2015/002033 Appellant: Mr. Venkatesh Nayak 55A,
More informationCentral Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi website cic.gov.
Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 website cic.gov.in Appeal No. CIC/MP/A/2014/002396 Appellant : Shri Sanjay Kumar,
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) File No.CIC/SA/A/2014/000254 Appellant : Mr. R.K.Jain Respondent : Department of Legal
More informationCIC/MP/A/2014/ CIC/MP/A/2014/ CIC/MP/A/2014/000999
Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 website cic.gov.in Appeal No. CIC/MP/A/2014/000997 CIC/MP/A/2014/000998 CIC/MP/A/2014/000999
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION D- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi (Through Video Conferencing)
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION D- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110066 PARTIES TO THE CASE: (Through Video Conferencing) Appellant : Shri Rameshwar Lal Bagotia
More informationPUBLIC GRIEVANCES COMMISSION
PUBLIC GRIEVANCES COMMISSION (Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi) APPELLATE AUTHORITY [Under Section 7, Delhi Right to Information Act, 2001] Date of Hearing : 11.06.2018 Date of Decision : 21.06.2018
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 F. No.CIC/LTGSE/A/2017/107836 F. No. CIC/GNCTD/A/2017/183479 F. No.CIC/DLSEC/A/2017/188996 F. No.CIC/YA/A/2016/002405
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Date of Hearing : 21.09.2016 Date of Decision : 21.09.2016 F. No.CIC/KY/A/2016/00391-YA CIC/YA/A/2016/000480 CIC/YA/A/2015/002610
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION D- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION D- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110066 PARTIES TO THE CASE: Appeal No.CIC/AT/A/2010/000969/SS Appellant : Shri Vinod Kumar Jain
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Date of Hearing : 17.02.2017 Date of Decision : 28.02.2017 Appellant/Complainant : Shri J P Singh F.NO. CIC/YA/A/2016/000407
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Date of Hearing : 18.10.2016 Date of Decision : 18.10.2016 F. No.CIC/YA/A/2015/002843 CIC/YA/A/2015/002630 CIC/YA/A/2015/002631
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi F. No.CIC/YA/A/2015/ CIC/YA/A/2015/002303
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 F. No.CIC/YA/A/2015/002029 CIC/YA/A/2015/002303 CIC/YA/A/2015/002030 CIC/YA/A/2015/002307 CIC/YA/A/2015/002035
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/WB/A/2006/01077 dated Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/WB/A/2006/01077 dated 8.9.2006 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 Appellant - Shri N.R. Gupta Respondent - Directorate of Training & Technical Education,
More informationCentral Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi website-cic.gov.
Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 website-cic.gov.in Case No. CIC/CC/C/2014/900253/MP Complainant Public Authority
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/OK/C/2007/00040 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 18
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/OK/C/2007/00040 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 18 Appellant - Shri B. R. Manhas Respondent - Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial Fund Facts: By an application
More informationAppellant : Shri Devdas Perumpilly ORDER. The present appeal, filed by Shri Devdas Perumpilly against Cochin Port Trust,
Central Information Commission Room No. 305, 2nd Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26167931 Case No. November 7, 2013 Appellant : Shri
More informationRef: RTI reply vide File No. CICCOM/R/2018/50164/CR-1 dated by Deputy Secretary & CPIO, Central Registry-1, CIC New Delhi.
Date: 16/03/2018 Ref: RTI reply vide File No. CICCOM/R/2018/50164/CR-1 dated 15.03.2018 by Deputy Secretary & CPIO, Central Registry-1, CIC New Delhi. From: Om Prakash S/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar
More informationCentral Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi website-cic.gov.
Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 website-cic.gov.in Case Nos. Appellant : Smt. Nirmal Garg, Delhi. Public Authority
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi )
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Central Information Commissioner CIC/EPFOG/A/2017/315385
More informationBEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO: EAD-2/AO/ /2013]
BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO: EAD-2/AO/134-139/2013] UNDER SECTION 15 I OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Date of Hearing : 19.01.2017 Date of Decision : 19.01.2017 F. No.CIC/YA/C/2016/000031 CIC/YA/A/2016/000255 CIC/KY/A/2016/000409-YA
More informationBEFORE THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY (Constituted Under Section 22A of The Chartered Accountants Act, 1949) APPEAL NO. 04/ICAI/2016 IN THE MATTER OF: Versus
BEFORE THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY (Constituted Under Section 22A of The Chartered Accountants Act, 1949) APPEAL NO. 04/ICAI/2016 IN THE MATTER OF: Harish Kapoor Versus...Appellant Institute of Chartered Accountants
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Phone: 011-26181927 Fax: 011-26185088 Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Central
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Date of Hearing : 15.11.2016 Date of Decision : 15.11.2016 F. No.CIC/YA/C/2016/000034 CIC/YA/C/2016/000143 CIC/YA/C/2016/000199
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Room No. 308, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Room No. 308, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 File No. CIC/SM/C/2009/000405/LS (A.N. Prasad Vs- Indian Army) Date : 12.3.2010 The proceedings
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Appellant: CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2 nd Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, NEW DELHI 110 066 TEL: 011 26717355 Shri Rehmat, R/o Manthan Adhyan Kendra, Dasher Maidan Road, Badwani
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi )
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Central Information Commissioner CIC/EPFOG/A/2017/119524
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION B - Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION B - Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110066 PARTIES TO THE CASE: Appellant : Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal (present in person alongwith
More informationCASE No. 48 of In the matter of Appointment of Committee for study of subsidy, and related matters.
Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13 th floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400 005. Tel. No. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 022 22163976 E-mail mercindia@mercindia.com
More informationBEFORE THE ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN (Appointed by the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission under Section 42(6) of the Electricity Act, 2003)
BEFORE THE ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN (Appointed by the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission under Section 42(6) of the Electricity Act, 2003) 606, KESHAVA, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai
More information[ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. PKB/AO 37/2011]
BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. PKB/AO 37/2011] UNDER SECTION 15-I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE 5 OF
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) No of 2018
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI IN THE MATTER OF: Ariizona Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Versus Union of India Present : Appellants Respondent For Appellants : Mr. Mihir Thakore, Senior
More informationDATED: 9th January, 2009
(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1398 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income ) Tax-3 Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. ) Road, Mumbai-400 020.
More informationTitle: Hakeem Tanveer V/s PIO Vigilance Organization Kashmir and PIO Forensic Science Laboratory, Jammu
Jammu and Kashmir State Information Commission (Constituted under Right to Information Act 2009) Old Assembly Complex, Srinagar, Fax No. 0194-2484269, 2484262 Wazarat Road Near DC Office, Jammu, Fax No.
More informationSaadat Ahmad Qadri v/s Chief Engineer EM&RE Kmr. Present: 1. Syed Mohammad Nayeem, PIO.
File No. SIC/K/SA/41/2014 Decision No. SIC/K/SA/41/2014/145 Title: Saadat Ahmad Qadri v/s Chief Engineer EM&RE Kmr. Present: 1. Syed Mohammad Nayeem, PIO. Srinagar 06.12.2014 Brief facts of this case are
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO OF 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2502 OF 2015 M/s. Bayer Material Science Pvt Ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax-10(3) and Others..Petitioner..Respondents
More informationCOMPOUNDING UNDER FEMA BY CA.SUDHA G. BHUSHAN. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA 25 th July 2015
COMPOUNDING UNDER FEMA BY CA.SUDHA G. BHUSHAN INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA 25 th July 2015 Scheme of Presentation Brief overview FEMA Enforcement under FEMA Adjudication and Appeal under
More information2. CPIO, Registrar (Admn.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai
B hcentral INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi -110066 Tel: +91-il-26186535 Appeat No.CrC/HcOsT/A I ZOt6 I go2g4z, crc/hcosr I N 2Ot6 I 30/2949,
More informationCentral Information Commission
Central Information Commission Room No. 306, 2nd Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26180512 Case No. CIC/LS/A/2013/001608-SS Dated:6.1.2014
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Date of decision: 7th March, LPA No. 741/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Date of decision: 7th March, 2012 LPA No. 741/2011 BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Advocate... Appellant Versus S.C.
More informationCentral Information Commission
Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Telefax:011 26180532 & 011 26107254 website cic.gov.in Appellant /Complainant :
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. ITA No-160/2005. Judgment reserved on: 12th March, 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER ITA No-160/2005 Judgment reserved on: 12th March, 2007 Judgment delivered on: 24th May, 2007 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-I, NEW DELHI...
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. LPA No.101/2010 and LPA No.461/2010 & CM Appl. Nos /2010. Date of Hearing:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT LPA No.101/2010 and LPA No.461/2010 & CM Appl. Nos.11988-11989/2010 Date of Hearing: 27.02.2012 Date of Decision: 07.03.2012 1) LPA
More informationCIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 516-527 OF 2004 Brij Lal & Ors.... Appellants versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar... Respondents with Civil
More informationDecided on: 08 th October, 2010
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (OS) 398/2009 % Reserved on: 20 th September, 2010 Decided on: 08 th October, 2010 Shri L.C.Sharma Through:...Appellant Mr. Rakesh Kumar Garg, Advocate versus
More informationIn the Central Information Commission at New Delhi
In the Central Information Commission at New Delhi File No: CIC/AD/A/2012/000768 Date of Hearing : May 22, 2012. Date of Decision : May 22, 2012. Parties: Applicant Shri Ashwani Kumar F 178/F2, Dilshad
More information* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 221/2014 & CM APPL.13917/2014. Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 221/2014 & CM APPL.13917/2014 Decided on: 12 th January, 2016 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY... Appellant Through: Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel for the DDA.
More informationCA SHARAD A SHAH. 21/06/2014 DTRC - Pune WIRC
CA SHARAD A SHAH 21/06/2014 DTRC - Pune WIRC-2014 1 Relevant Part of Section 271 (1) If the Assessing Officer] or the [Commissioner (Appeals)][or the Commissioner] in the course of any proceedings under
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Advocate. Versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1990/2010 PREM KUMAR Judgment delivered on:08 th February, 2016 Represented by: Advocate. Versus... Petitioner Mr. Yogesh Verma, CUSTOMS... Respondent
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI B BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA, AM ORDER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI B BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA, AM STAY APPLICATION No. 293/Mum/2013 (Arising out of ITA No.6678/M/2013 Asst
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL INJUNCTION FAO (OS) NO. 157 OF Date of Decision : 10th July, 2007.
CORAM: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL INJUNCTION FAO (OS) NO. 157 OF 2007 Date of Decision : 10th July, 2007. RASEEL G. ANSAL... Appellant. Through Mr. Arvind K. Nigam
More information: The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Central Range 1, Room No 308, New Building 46, Mahatma Gandhi Road Chennai
Letter No. ADR04/Appeal/DMDK/18/12/2012 Designated Appellate Authority Postal Address : First Appellate Authority : The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Central Range 1, Room No 308, New Building 46, Mahatma
More informationF.No /2012 Appeal/8th Meeting-2012 NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi
F.No.89-417/2012 Appeal/8th Meeting-2012 NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 24/08/2012 O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Murlidhar
More informationCIN: U70101MP2008PLC Director(s) 2. Santoshi Lal Rathore AEXPR6319A 3. Kanchan Rajawat
WTM/GM/EFD/ 35 /2017-18 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER Under Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 read with Regulation 65 of the Securities and
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Smt. Beena A. Pillai, JM
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Smt. Beena A. Pillai, JM : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Income Tax Officer, TDS Rohtak (APPELLANT) PAN No. RTKPO1586E
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2349 of 2014 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH sd/ and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER sd/ =============================================
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, Date of Decision : 28th February, ITA 92/2011.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Date of Decision : 28th February, 2012. ITA 92/2011 CIT Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, sr. standing counsel... Appellant versus MACHINO
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi )
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) File No.CIC/SA/A/2014/000669 (Hearing of Show Cause Notice) Appellant : Sh. Anil Sood Respondent
More informationOrder Under Section 29A of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987 in respect of M/s Kerala Housing Finance Limited
1. Background Order Under Section 29A of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987 in respect of M/s Kerala Housing Finance Limited Kerala Housing Finance Limited, a company having its registered office at II
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE A BENCH, BANGALORE
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE A BENCH, BANGALORE BEFORE SMT P.MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ABRAHAM P GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.220 & 1043(BNG.)/2013 (Assessment year
More informationCASE No. 113 of Coram. Shri. Azeez M. Khan, Member Shri. Deepak Lad, Member
Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400005. Tel. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 22163976 Email: mercindia@merc.gov.in Website:
More informationCentral Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi. OA No.571/2017
Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi OA No.571/2017 Hon ble Mr. K.N. Shrivastava, Member (A) Order Reserved on: 13.02.2018 Pronounced on:17.04.2018 G.C. Yadav, S/o late Kamal Singh
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6732/2015 T.T. LTD. Versus Through: Date of Decision: 7 th January, 2016... Petitioner Ms.Shilpi Jain Sharma, Adv. UNION OF INDIA & ANR... Respondents
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJENDRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJENDRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 1999-2000 Bennett Coleman & Co.Ltd., The Times
More informationREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF Tapan Kumar Dutta...
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2014 OF 2007 Tapan Kumar Dutta... Appellant(s) Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal... Respondent(s) J U
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO.360 of 2016 (Arising from the SLP(Civil) No.
1 Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.360 of 2016 (Arising from the SLP(Civil) No.527 of 2015) State of Gujarat and Another.Appellants Versus Shree
More informationA FORTNIGHTLY VAT/GST LAW REPORTER 2003 NTN 22)-7 [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT]
2003 (Vol. 22)-7 [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] Hon'ble Shyamal Kumar Sen, C.J. & Hon'ble R.K. Agrawal, J. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1338 OF 1991 M/s Mukund Lal Banarasi Lal vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax,
More informationU;k;ky; eq[; vk;qdr fu% kdrtu
U;k;ky; eq[; vk;qdr fu% kdrtu Court of Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities Lkkekftd U;k;,oa vf/kdkfjrk ea=ky; Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment fu% kdrrk dk;z fohkkx@department of Disability
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of decision: 16th December, 2013 RFA No.581/2013.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of decision: 16th December, 2013 RFA No.581/2013 SUNIL GUPTA Through: Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, Adv.... Appellant Versus HARISH
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH B, LUCKNOW. ITA No.486/LKW/2016 Assessment Year:
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH B, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI. T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY,JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.486/LKW/2016 Assessment Year:2012-13 Pankaj
More informationBEFORE THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY (Constituted under Section 22A of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949) APPEAL NO. 03/ICAI/2017 IN THE MATTER OF:
BEFORE THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY (Constituted under Section 22A of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949) APPEAL NO. 03/ICAI/2017 IN THE MATTER OF: M. Sivaiah...Appellant Versus Disciplinary Committee of the
More informationAdditional Pension on the basis of Contribution over and above Wage Limit of either Rs.5,000/- or Rs.6,500/- per Month.
CIRCULAR No.02/2019 To All Members of the Association Off : 26613091 / 26607167 42103360 / 26761877 Email : kea@kea.co.in Web : www.kea.co.in KARNATAKA EMPLOYERS' ASSOCIATION NO.74, 2 nd FLOOR, SHANKARA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ASN 1/16 WP-3174-13.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.3174 OF 2013 The Director of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai, Having his office
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATER. Judgment delivered on: ITA 243/2008. versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATER Judgment delivered on: 26.11.2008 ITA 243/2008 SUBODH KUMAR BHARGAVA... Appellant versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX... Respondent Advocates
More informationIN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION UNDER THE BYELAWS, RULES ®ULATIONS OF NATIONAL STOCK OF INDIA LIMITED (NSEIL)
BEFORE THE SOLE ARBITRATOR SHRI S C GUPTA ----------------------------------------------------------------------- IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION UNDER THE BYELAWS, RULES ®ULATIONS OF NATIONAL STOCK OF
More informationStatement of Practice on penalties for incorrect returns
Statement of Practice on penalties for incorrect returns States of Guernsey Income Tax PO Box 37 St Peter Port Guernsey GY1 3AZ Telephone: (01481) 724711 Facsimile: (01481) 713911 E-mail: taxenquiries@gov.gg
More informationSTATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERSS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON COMPILED BY M. L. KANAUJIA, IRSSE
STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERSS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON 01.10.2013 COMPILED BY M. L. KANAUJIA, IRSSE / Chief Communication Engineer, N.E. Railway, (Rtd.) Item HEARD BY 1 PETITION NO. & YEAR
More informationBEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER
WTM/PS/75/CIS-NRO/LKO/OCT/2015 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER Under Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, Date of Decision: 23rd February, ITA 1222/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Date of Decision: 23rd February, 2012. ITA 1222/2011 CIT... Appellant Through: Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus
More informationWard 2(1), Jammu Jammu
Letter No. ADR04/Appeal/J&KPP/26/11/2012 Designated Appellate Authority Postal Address : First Appellate Authority : Chief of Income Tax (Appeal), Jammu Aayakar Bhawan, Rail Head complex Panama Chowk,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR C.S.T.A. NO.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR BETWEEN C.S.T.A. NO.4/2015 THE
More informationBEFORE THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY (Constituted under The Company Secretaries Act, 1980) APPEAL NO. 11/ICSI/2015
BEFORE THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY (Constituted under The Company Secretaries Act, 1980) APPEAL NO. 11/ICSI/2015 Date of pronouncement of order : 8 th August,2016 Sital Prasad Swain...... Appellant Versus
More informationCIT v. Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. ()
(2010) 322 ITR 0158 :(2010) 032 (I) ITCL 0600 :(2010) 230 CTR 0320 :(2010) 036 DTR 0449 CIT v. Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. () INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 --Penalty under section 271(1)(c)--Inaccurate particulars
More informationBEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Appeal No.83 of 2010 Date of decision: 11.03.2011 Liquid Holdings Private Limited 217, IInd Floor, Antriksh Bhawan, 22, K.G. Marg, New Delhi... Appellant
More informationF.No /2010-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi /01/2011
F.No.89-1006/2010-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 05/01/2011 O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Ch. Het Ram Johari Memorial
More informationprima facie case of contravention of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance, Cap
282 62 12 $#%% &'()* 7126 4564782 7852 621 79 12 2687 6 012 4564782 79 4581 8 2878 8 282 8 466 7 46772 62288 5268 79 742 1 12 2687 62! 012 226 462 79 8 7 547 8 2878 7 "8 8" 88! #82 79 42687 72 8 2878 976
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7313/2010 Date of decision: December 08, 2011 RRB CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS PVT LTD... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.Krishnan with Mr. Nishank Singh,
More information!'axmesange No..9.:? /ICA...
07-JRN-2011 11:51 From: ICRR HQ NEW DELHI IN 0091+11+23387293 To: 25841282!'aXMesange No..9.:? /ICA... oated.... 1..!..}..1.2:::.?..I.L...... No. of pages...... 9. 1",,1Ir.0I ICAR INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGlUCULTURAL
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 17.11.2016 Pronounced on: 03.07.2017 + ITA 240/2004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... Appellant Through : Sh. Raghvendra Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel and
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2005-06 DCIT, Cir. 6(1), R.No.506, 5 th
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION. Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Information Commissioner CIC/SA/A/2016/000209
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Information Commissioner CIC/SA/A/2016/000209
More information