The Appellant was present at the NIC Studio, Rohtak.
|
|
- Belinda Bailey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Central Information Commission, New Delhi (Two Same Cases) Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section (19) Date of hearing Date of decision : : 10th January th January 2017 Name of the Appellant : SHRI RAJBIR PHOGAT H NO 1161/21 PHOGAT VILLA, MAIN HAFED ROAD, PREM NAGAR, ROHTAK, HARYANA Name of the Public Authority/Respondent : CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, DENA BANK ZONAL OFFICE, NORTH INDIA REGION, 2ND FLOOR, SCO-66, SECTOR-11, PANCHKULA, HARYANA RTI Application filed on : 03/08/2015 and 03/09/2015 CPIO replied on : 03/09/2015 and 22/09/2015 First Appeal filed on : 06/09/2015 First Appellate Authority order on : 01/10/ nd Appeal received on : 14/10/2015 The Appellant was present at the NIC Studio, Rohtak. On behalf of the Respondents, Shri Ram Dayal Negi, Chief Manager was present at the NIC Studio, Panchkula. Information Commissioner : Shri Sharat Sabharwal File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/ Information sought This matter concerns an RTI application filed by the Appellant, seeking information on nineteen points regarding the case of M/s HRM Exports Private Limited and related issues.
2 The CPIO reply The CPIO provided some information to the Appellant. Grounds of the First Appeal Not satisfied with the CPIO s reply. Order of the First Appellate Authority The FAA upheld the CPIO s reply. Grounds of the Second Appeal Not satisfied with the reply given by the Respondents. File No. CIC/SH/A/2016/ This file contains an RTI application dated , seeking the same information as in the RTI application dated , contained in File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/ Relevant facts emerging during the Hearing, Discussion and Decision The Respondents submitted that a loan of 30 crores was sanctioned to M/s HRM Exports Pvt. Ltd. and the Appellant was Chief Manager in the bank. Subsequently, a fraud was found to have been committed in respect of this loan. Disciplinary action was taken against the Appellant and he was dismissed from service. The matter was also investigated by the CBI and the issue of criminal prosecution is pending against the Appellant in a CBI Court. 2. The Appellant stated that complete information has not been provided to him. In his appeal to the Commission, he has expressed his dissatisfaction with the information provided to him in response to points No. 1 to 3, 6 to 14 and 16 to 19.
3 3. We have perused the records. With regard to point No. 1, the Appellant stated that he had sought a copy of the minutes of the credit committee of the RO and HO for recommending the proposal in the case of M/s HRM Exports Pvt. Ltd. However, he has been provided only a copy of the proposal of the Zonal Office. The CPIO is directed to provide to the Appellant the specific information sought by him, as available on records of the bank. As regards points No. 2 and 3, we note that the CPIO stated that the information was not available with the branch. We do not agree with this reply because the RTI application was filed to the public authority and the response cannot be confined to the records of a branch. Therefore, the CPIO is directed to get this information from the office(s) concerned of the public authority and provide it to the Appellant. At points No. 7 and 8, the Appellant sought information regarding suspension and reinstatement of third party officers of the bank. This information is exempted from disclosure under Section 8 (1) (j) of the RTI Act in view of the Supreme Court judgment dated in Girish Ramchandra Deshpande Vs. Central Information Commissioner & Ors. [Special Leave Petition (Civil) No of 2012]. Regarding point No. 9, the CPIO is directed to provide to the Appellant hard copies of the various circulars mentioned in his reply dated Regarding points No. 10 and 11, we note that the CPIO has given a categorical reply that no such letter is on record and we would not interfere with the above reply. At points No. 6, 12, 13 and 14 of the RTI application, the Appellant has sought information regarding the copy of the complaint sent by the bank to the CBI and the FIR lodged by the CBI as well as copies of the closure report of the CBI, their findings and correspondence between the bank and the CBI. We see no ground to interfere with the CPIO s reply to point No. 6. As regards points No. 12, 13 and 14, we note that the matter is before a CBI Court. In this context, we further note that in its full bench decision dated in appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2008/01238, the Commission made the following observations:- 25. In our view, the word impede used in Section 8(1)(h) holds the key to whether information requested by the appellant should be allowed to be disclosed.
4 26. We note that the essential information which appellant wants is all that happened between the CBI and the competent authority records of discussion, telephonic conversations, filenotings, etc. which led to the sanction of prosecution dated against appellant s son, Shri Srinivas for action under prevention of corruption Act. We have been informed that this sanction of prosecution is an absolute requirement for a Trial Court to allow prosecution proceedings against an accused, who happens to be a government employee. It is always open to the accused to impeach the sanction of prosecution, in course of which he is free to request the Trial Court to summon all such evidence which may be relevant for him to prove his point. Such evidence would include every single item of information appellant has now demanded through RTI proceeding. The Court s decision, whether to allow the appellant access to such evidence, is taken after hearing both sides. 27. It is thus obvious that in the matter of access to the requested information, appellant is not all that helpless. He can seek the same information through the Trial Court in full measure and should he succeed in persuading the Court he would have received the records and documents which he is wanting now to access through RTI Act. In our view, an information which is evidence or is related to evidence in an ongoing prosecution comes under the control of the Trial Court within the meaning of Section 2(j) of the RTI Act, which states as follows: right to information means the right to information accessible under
5 this Act which is held by or under the control of any public authority and includes the right to It is significant that this Section uses two expressions about the location of a given information, i.e. held and under the control of. In our view, expression held implies that a public authority has physical possession of a given information. The word under the control of implies that the information, regardless of which public authority holds it, is under the control of a specific public authority on whose orders alone it can be produced in a given proceeding. In the present case, the material sought by the appellant is undoubtedly related to an ongoing court proceeding and hence it can be rightly said to be under the control of the Trial Court, who alone can decide how the information is to be dispensed. Any action under the RTI Act or any other Act for disclosure of that information to the very party who is arraigned before the Trial Court or to anyone representing that party, would have the effect of interfering with the discretion of the Court, thereby impeding an extant prosecution proceeding. In S.M.Lamba Vs. S.C.Gupta and another Delhi High Court has held This court would like to observe that under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 once the stage of an order framing charges have been crossed, it would be open to the accused to make an appropriate application before the learned trial court to summon the above documents in accordance with the law.
6 30. It is, therefore, important that all determinations about disclosure of any information relating to an ongoing prosecution should be through the agency of the Trial Court and not otherwise. The above observations of the Commission are germane to the matter before us concerning points No. 12, 13 and 14 of the RTI application. Therefore, we would refrain from directing the Respondents to provide any information in response to the above three points. As regards point No. 16, the CPIO should provide the specific information sought by the Appellant regarding the minutes and approval of the competent authority. In our view, the information sought at point No. 17 is clear and the CPIO should provide it, if available on records. If, however, no review meetings regarding continued suspension were conducted, the CPIO should state so categorically. Regarding points No. 18 and 19, the CPIO should provide to the Appellant hard copies of the various circulars mentioned in his reply dated The CPIO should comply with our above directives, within thirty days of the receipt of this order, under intimation to the Commission. Such information, as is provided, should be provided free of charge. 4. With the above directions and observations, the two appeals are disposed of. 5. Copies of this order be given free of cost to the parties. Sd/- (Sharat Sabharwal) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this Commission. (Vijay Bhalla) Deputy Registrar
On behalf of the Respondents, Shri Manoj Jain, GM was present at the NIC Studio, Mumbai.
Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/002007 Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section (19) Date of hearing Date of decision : : 14th December 2016 14th December 2016 Name
More informationOn behalf of the Respondents, the following were present in person:- These files contain four appeals and one complaint in respect of the RTI
Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/002325 File No. CIC/SH/C/2015/000459 File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/002156 File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/002329 Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section
More informationThe Appellant was present at the NIC Studio, Bhilwara.
Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. CIC/SH/A/2016/000521 File No. CIC/SH/A/2016/000739 File No. CIC/SH/A/2016/001056 File No. CIC/SH/A/2016/000803 File No. CIC/SH/A/2016/001067 Right to
More informationThe Appellant was present at the NIC Studio, Kolkata.
Central Information Commission, New Delhi Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section (19) Date of hearing Date of decision : : 17 th November 2016 23 rd November 2016 Name of the Appellant : SHRI ANIL
More informationOn behalf of the Respondents, Shri Dinesh Kumar S. Parmar, Deputy Zonal
Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section (19) Date of first hearing Date of first order Date of second hearing Date of second order Date of third hearing
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION D- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION D- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110066 PARTIES TO THE CASE: Appeal No.CIC/AT/A/2010/000969/SS Appellant : Shri Vinod Kumar Jain
More informationCentral Information Commission, New Delhi
Central Information Commission, New Delhi FileNos. CIC/LS/A/2013/000954/SH, CIC/LS/A/2013/000955/SH, CIC/LS/A/2013/000956/SH, CIC/LS/A/2013/000957/SH, CIC/LS/A/2013/000958/SH, CIC/LS/A/2013/000959/SH,
More informationक यस चन आय ग CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION ब ब ग ग न थ म ग
क यस चन आय ग CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION ब ब ग ग न थ म ग Baba Gangnath Marg, म नरक, नईदल -110067 Munirka, New Delhi-110067 Tel: 011-26182593/26182594 Email: registryicab@gmail.com File No.: CIC/RAILB/A/2017/146935
More informationCentral Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi website-cic.gov.
Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 website-cic.gov.in Appeal Nos. CIC/SH/A/2016/000299/MP, CIC/MP/A/2016/000096, CIC/MP/A/2016/000348,
More informationCentral Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi website-cic.gov.
Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 website-cic.gov.in Case Nos. Appellant : Smt. Nirmal Garg, Delhi. Public Authority
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION D- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi (Through Video Conferencing)
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION D- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110066 PARTIES TO THE CASE: (Through Video Conferencing) Appellant : Shri Rameshwar Lal Bagotia
More informationCIC/MP/A/2014/ CIC/MP/A/2014/ CIC/MP/A/2014/000999
Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 website cic.gov.in Appeal No. CIC/MP/A/2014/000997 CIC/MP/A/2014/000998 CIC/MP/A/2014/000999
More informationTitle: Hakeem Tanveer V/s PIO Vigilance Organization Kashmir and PIO Forensic Science Laboratory, Jammu
Jammu and Kashmir State Information Commission (Constituted under Right to Information Act 2009) Old Assembly Complex, Srinagar, Fax No. 0194-2484269, 2484262 Wazarat Road Near DC Office, Jammu, Fax No.
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Date of Hearing : 21.09.2016 Date of Decision : 21.09.2016 F. No.CIC/KY/A/2016/00391-YA CIC/YA/A/2016/000480 CIC/YA/A/2015/002610
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Date of Hearing : 18.10.2016 Date of Decision : 18.10.2016 F. No.CIC/YA/A/2015/002843 CIC/YA/A/2015/002630 CIC/YA/A/2015/002631
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Advocate. Versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1990/2010 PREM KUMAR Judgment delivered on:08 th February, 2016 Represented by: Advocate. Versus... Petitioner Mr. Yogesh Verma, CUSTOMS... Respondent
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.958 OF Prem Nath Bali Appellant(s) VERSUS J U D G M E N T
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.958 OF 2010 Reportable Prem Nath Bali Appellant(s) VERSUS Registrar, High Court of Delhi & Anr. Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/OK/C/2007/00040 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 18
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/OK/C/2007/00040 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 18 Appellant - Shri B. R. Manhas Respondent - Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial Fund Facts: By an application
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi Tel :
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi -110067 Tel : +91-11-26717355 Appeal No. CIC/VS/A/2015/002033 Appellant: Mr. Venkatesh Nayak 55A,
More informationCentral Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi website-cic.gov.
Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 website-cic.gov.in Case No. CIC/CC/C/2014/900253/MP Complainant Public Authority
More informationIN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 485 of 2018
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL [arising out of Order dated 6 th July, 2018 by National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench in C.P (IB) No. 35/CHD/HP/2018] IN THE MATTER OF : Lalan Kumar
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi )
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Central Information Commissioner CIC/EPFOG/A/2017/315385
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Appellant: CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2 nd Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, NEW DELHI 110 066 TEL: 011 26717355 Shri Rehmat, R/o Manthan Adhyan Kendra, Dasher Maidan Road, Badwani
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI COMPANY APPEAL(AT) NO.340 OF 2018
1 NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI COMPANY APPEAL(AT) NO.340 OF 2018 (ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 02.05.2018 PASSED BY NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI BENCH, NEW DELHI IN COMPANY
More informationAppellant : Shri Devdas Perumpilly ORDER. The present appeal, filed by Shri Devdas Perumpilly against Cochin Port Trust,
Central Information Commission Room No. 305, 2nd Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26167931 Case No. November 7, 2013 Appellant : Shri
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Date of Hearing : 17.02.2017 Date of Decision : 28.02.2017 Appellant/Complainant : Shri J P Singh F.NO. CIC/YA/A/2016/000407
More information: The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Central Range 1, Room No 308, New Building 46, Mahatma Gandhi Road Chennai
Letter No. ADR04/Appeal/DMDK/18/12/2012 Designated Appellate Authority Postal Address : First Appellate Authority : The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Central Range 1, Room No 308, New Building 46, Mahatma
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August KrantiBhawan, BhikajiCama Place, New Delhi Tel :
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August KrantiBhawan, BhikajiCama Place, New Delhi -110066 Tel : +91-11-26186535 Appeal No. CIC/SA/A/2016/000543 Appellant: Respondent: Mrs. Anita Chhabra,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR C.S.T.A. NO.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR BETWEEN C.S.T.A. NO.4/2015 THE
More informationCentral Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi website cic.gov.
Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 website cic.gov.in Appeal No. CIC/MP/A/2014/002396 Appellant : Shri Sanjay Kumar,
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi )
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Central Information Commissioner CIC/EPFOG/A/2017/119524
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) File No.CIC/SA/A/2014/000254 Appellant : Mr. R.K.Jain Respondent : Department of Legal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Reportable CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1928 OF 2019 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.24690 of 2018) SANJAY SINGH AND ANR.. Appellants VERSUS
More informationWard 2(1), Jammu Jammu
Letter No. ADR04/Appeal/J&KPP/26/11/2012 Designated Appellate Authority Postal Address : First Appellate Authority : Chief of Income Tax (Appeal), Jammu Aayakar Bhawan, Rail Head complex Panama Chowk,
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Date of Hearing : 19.01.2017 Date of Decision : 19.01.2017 F. No.CIC/YA/C/2016/000031 CIC/YA/A/2016/000255 CIC/KY/A/2016/000409-YA
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE A BENCH, BANGALORE
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE A BENCH, BANGALORE BEFORE SMT P.MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ABRAHAM P GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.220 & 1043(BNG.)/2013 (Assessment year
More informationCentral Information Commission
Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Telefax:011 26180532 & 011 26107254 website cic.gov.in Appellant /Complainant :
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi F. No.CIC/YA/A/2015/ CIC/YA/A/2015/002303
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 F. No.CIC/YA/A/2015/002029 CIC/YA/A/2015/002303 CIC/YA/A/2015/002030 CIC/YA/A/2015/002307 CIC/YA/A/2015/002035
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION B - Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION B - Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110066 PARTIES TO THE CASE: Appellant : Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal (present in person alongwith
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 VERSUS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.9365 OF 2017 VERSUS WITH
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.15613 OF 2017 M/S. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEALS & ORS. WITH RESPONDENT(S)
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI BEFORE SHRI N.S. SAINI, HON BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, HON BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER (Asst. Year : 2009-10) DCIT, Circle-1(1), Panaji.
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH `F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI C.L.SETHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH `F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI C.L.SETHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER. I.T. A. No.4931/Del/2010 Assessment Year: 2007-08 Quippo
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR ITA NO.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 05 TH DAY OF MARCH 2014 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR BETWEEN: ITA NO.828/2007 H.Raghavendra
More informationIn the complaint: Titled: Ab. Rashid Sheikh v/s RTO Kashmir. Present: 1. Mr. Mehmood Ahmad Shah, RTO Kashmir. 2. Mr. Manzoor Ahmad, ARTO.
File No. SIC/K/Comp/03/2015 Decision No. SIC/K/Comp/03/2015/05 In the complaint: Titled: Ab. Rashid Sheikh v/s RTO Kashmir Present: 1. Mr. Mehmood Ahmad Shah, RTO Kashmir. 2. Mr. Manzoor Ahmad, ARTO. Srinagar
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.324 OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.) No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA REPORTABLE CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.324 OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.) No.5655 of 2018) Nagaraj.Appellant(s) VERSUS Union of India.Respondent(s)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 1749/2010... Appellant Mr.Sanjeev Counsel. Sabharwal, Sr. Standing MAGIC INTERNATIONAL P LTD... Respondent Through: Dr.Rakesh Gupta with Ms.Rani Kiyala, Advocates.
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJENDRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJENDRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 1999-2000 Bennett Coleman & Co.Ltd., The Times
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H : NEW DELHI VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.D.AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.1580/Del/2010 Assessment Year : 2004-05 05 M/s
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CUSAA 4/2013. Versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 16. + CUSAA 4/2013 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS... Appellant Through Mr Rahul Kaushik, Senior Standing Counsel. Versus ORION ENTERPRISES... Respondent Through Mr
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Date of Hearing : 15.11.2016 Date of Decision : 15.11.2016 F. No.CIC/YA/C/2016/000034 CIC/YA/C/2016/000143 CIC/YA/C/2016/000199
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: H : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI I.C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: H : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI I.C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 1322 /Del/2012 Assessment Year: 2003-04 Asstt.
More informationFirst Appeal No. A/01/1426 (Arisen out of Order Dated 24/08/2001 in Case No. 93/2001 of District Forum, Buldhana)
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA CIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR 5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1 CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR 440 001 First Appeal No. A/01/1426 (Arisen out of Order Dated
More informationRef: RTI reply vide File No. CICCOM/R/2018/50164/CR-1 dated by Deputy Secretary & CPIO, Central Registry-1, CIC New Delhi.
Date: 16/03/2018 Ref: RTI reply vide File No. CICCOM/R/2018/50164/CR-1 dated 15.03.2018 by Deputy Secretary & CPIO, Central Registry-1, CIC New Delhi. From: Om Prakash S/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar
More information2. CPIO, Registrar (Admn.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai
B hcentral INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi -110066 Tel: +91-il-26186535 Appeat No.CrC/HcOsT/A I ZOt6 I go2g4z, crc/hcosr I N 2Ot6 I 30/2949,
More informationSaadat Ahmad Qadri v/s Chief Engineer EM&RE Kmr. Present: 1. Syed Mohammad Nayeem, PIO.
File No. SIC/K/SA/41/2014 Decision No. SIC/K/SA/41/2014/145 Title: Saadat Ahmad Qadri v/s Chief Engineer EM&RE Kmr. Present: 1. Syed Mohammad Nayeem, PIO. Srinagar 06.12.2014 Brief facts of this case are
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Phone: 011-26181927 Fax: 011-26185088 Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Central
More informationof the CIT(A)- 16, New Delhi relating to assessment year
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH E, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA A. PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2011-12 Smt. Prem Jain, 2683/85, Gali
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: 20 th January, 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 20 th January, 2010 + ITA 239/2008 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... Appellant Through: Ms Suruchi Aggarwal versus GOETZE (INDIA) LTD. Through:...
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No. 7 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2014] Versus
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 7 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No. 17975 of 2014] Management of the Barara Cooperative Marketing cum Processing
More informationIn the matter of: (Amended Memo of Parties)
1 IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, CHANDIGARH (EXERCISING THE POWERS OF ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY UNDER THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016) In the matter of: (Amended Memo of Parties)
More informationBEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 35 OF Versus
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 35 OF 2014 In the matter of 1. M/s Deepak Construction Co. Through Its Proprietor, Deepak Yadav, Village- Raghunathpura, Tehsil-
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) No. 265 of 2018
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI IN THE MATTER OF: Yogendra Pal Jain SCO-44, Old Judicial Complex, Civil Lines Gurgaon-110001 Appellant Vs 1. South Eastern Carriers Pvt. Ltd. 2 nd Floor,
More informationARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 1989 of 2012
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR OA 1989 of 2012 Jainarain Shivrain Petitioner(s) Vs Union of India and others Respondent(s) For the Petitioner (s) : Mr Surinder Sheoran,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of decision: 26th November, 2012 MAC.APP. 246/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of decision: 26th November, 2012 MAC.APP. 246/2010 ROSHINI DEVI & ORS. Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. with Ms. Suman N.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. (O&M) Date of decision: 4.8.2010 M/s V.K. Timber Pvt. Ltd. -----Appellant. Vs. Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals) & another. -----Respondents CORAM:-
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL No(s). 176 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No(s). 176 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.8851 of 2018) PALLAVI Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH
More informationREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF Tapan Kumar Dutta...
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2014 OF 2007 Tapan Kumar Dutta... Appellant(s) Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal... Respondent(s) J U
More informationPage 1 of 5 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA SMC BENCH, AGRA [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM] M/s Vijay Veer Singh Saiyan Road, Kheragarh Agra [PAN:AAEFV6250G].Appellant Vs. Income Tax Officer Ward 4(4),
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDCITON. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.742 of 2015) OM PRAKASH APPELLANT
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDCITON CIVIL APPEAL NO. 15611 OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.742 of 2015) OM PRAKASH APPELLANT VERSUS RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE AND
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/WB/A/2006/01077 dated Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/WB/A/2006/01077 dated 8.9.2006 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 Appellant - Shri N.R. Gupta Respondent - Directorate of Training & Technical Education,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.5282/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 2nd July, 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.5282/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 2nd July, 2013 R.K. JAIN Through: Mr. K.G. Mishra, Advocate. versus... Petitioner PUNJAB NATIONAL
More information$~23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7131/2015 % Judgment dated 29 th July, versus
$~23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7131/2015 % Judgment dated 29 th July, 2015 UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through : versus Mr.Sarfaraz Khan, Adv.... Petitioners U. RAI ARYA... Respondent
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 F. No.CIC/LTGSE/A/2017/107836 F. No. CIC/GNCTD/A/2017/183479 F. No.CIC/DLSEC/A/2017/188996 F. No.CIC/YA/A/2016/002405
More informationchallenging the order dated passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in W.P. 2. The appellant had approached the Central
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1849 OF 2012 DR. T. MURUGAN Appellant(s) VERSUS THE CHAIRMAN NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI AND ORS. Respondent(s)
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Room No. 308, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Room No. 308, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 File No. CIC/SM/C/2009/000405/LS (A.N. Prasad Vs- Indian Army) Date : 12.3.2010 The proceedings
More informationTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI IV... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate VERSUS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT ITA NO.1192/2011 Reserved on : 8th November, 2011. Date of Decision : 21st November, 2011. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI IV... Appellant
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
1 ITA Nos. 6675 & 6676/Del/2015 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 6675/DEL/2015 ( A.Y 2013-14)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3198 OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No of 2017) VERSUS
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3198 OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.11937 of 2017) CTO, Anti Evasion, Circle III, Rajasthan, Jaipur.Appellant(s)
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH L, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL (A.M) & SHRI N.V.VASUDEVAN(J.M) ITA NO.5779/MUM/07(A.Y ) Vs.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH L, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL (A.M) & SHRI N.V.VASUDEVAN(J.M) ITA NO.5779/MUM/07(A.Y.2003-04) The ACIT, Range 8(3), Room No.204, 2 nd Floor, Aaykay Bhavan,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION NON-REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9651 OF 2018 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 30323 OF 2014) M/S BEE GEE CORPORATION PVT. LTD VERSUS PUNJAB
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH G, MUMBAI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH G, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER O/o. Income Tax Officer 2(1)(1) Room
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. LPA No.101/2010 and LPA No.461/2010 & CM Appl. Nos /2010. Date of Hearing:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT LPA No.101/2010 and LPA No.461/2010 & CM Appl. Nos.11988-11989/2010 Date of Hearing: 27.02.2012 Date of Decision: 07.03.2012 1) LPA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF Versus. M/s Garg Sons International.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1557 OF 2004 Export Credit Guarantee Corpn. of India Ltd. Appellant Versus M/s Garg Sons International Respondent
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: INCOME TAX MATTER. Judgment delivered on : ITR Nos. 159 to 161 /1988
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: INCOME TAX MATTER Judgment delivered on : 09.07.2008 ITR Nos. 159 to 161 /1988 M/S DELHI INTER EXPORTS PVT LTD... Appellant versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
More informationCentral Information Commission
Central Information Commission Room No. 306, 2nd Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26180512 Case No. CIC/LS/A/2013/001608-SS Dated:6.1.2014
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI COMPANY APPEAL(AT) NO.156 OF 2018
1 IN THE MATTER OF: NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 1. Janakiraman Srinivasan S/o Mr. S. Srinivasan. NEW DELHI COMPANY APPEAL(AT) NO.156 OF 2018 2. Janakiraman Priya, W/o Mr. Janakiraman Srinivasan
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: F NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. G.C. GUPTA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: F NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. G.C. GUPTA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER. I.T.A Nos. 1766 to 1768/Del/2015 Assessment Years-2011-12
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA C BENCH, KOLKATA. Before Shri Shamim Yahya (Accountant Member), and Shri George Mathan (Judicial Member)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA C BENCH, KOLKATA Before Shri Shamim Yahya (Accountant Member), and Shri George Mathan (Judicial Member) I.T.A. No. 718/Kol. / 2014 Assessment year : 2011-2012
More informationTHE INDIAN JURIST
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3101-3102 OF 2015 EX. LT. COL. R.K. RAI APPELLANT VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N T ASHOK
More informationAkshar Builders and Developers. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax 28(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 14490 OF 2018 Akshar Builders and Developers.. Petitioner v/s. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax 28(1) Mumbai &
More informationREPORTED * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision : December 06, 2010 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL
REPORTED * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. NO. 305/2009 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate. versus SMT. BIRBATI AND ORS. Through:...
More informationACIT Vs. Shri Ravindrakumar Toshniwal (ITAT Mumbai)- AO has treated the said transactions as bogus transactions on the ground that-
ACIT Vs. Shri Ravindrakumar Toshniwal (ITAT Mumbai)- AO has treated the said transactions as bogus transactions on the ground that- a) The sale transactions were not on the floor of the ASEL but were off
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3925 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 29160 of 2018) Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority & Anr.
More information[ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. PKB/AO 37/2011]
BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. PKB/AO 37/2011] UNDER SECTION 15-I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE 5 OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.19400 OF 2017 [Arising out of SLP (C) No. 8858 of 2017] RAJ KUMAR BHATIA...APPELLANT Versus SUBHASH CHANDER BHATIA...RESPONDENT
More information* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Decided on GROUP 4 SECURITAS GUARDING LTD. Versus AND. Versus
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 20.09.2011 +W.P.(C) No. 4408/2000 GROUP 4 SECURITAS GUARDING LTD. Petitioner Through: Mr. Harvinder Singh & Mr. Prattek Kohli, Advocate Versus EMPLOYEES
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) No. 421 of M/s. Manila Resorts Pvt. Ltd.
IN THE MATTER OF: NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI M/s. Manila Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Versus BAHL Paper Mills Ltd. & Ors. Present: For Appellant : Respondents Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra and
More informationAPPEALS & REVISIONS. PART I (For CAF-6 and ICMAP students)
Chapter 18 APPEALS & REVISIONS Section Rule Topic covered (Part - I for CAF-6 & ICMAP students) PART I 127 76 Appeal to the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) 128 Procedure in appeal 129 Decision in
More informationIn the Central Information Commission at New Delhi
In the Central Information Commission at New Delhi File No: CIC/AD/A/2012/000768 Date of Hearing : May 22, 2012. Date of Decision : May 22, 2012. Parties: Applicant Shri Ashwani Kumar F 178/F2, Dilshad
More informationREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF B.L. Passi... Appellant(s)
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3892 OF 2007 B.L. Passi... Appellant(s) Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi... Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T
More information