District Court Determines IRS Exceeded Regulatory Limit on FBAR Penalties
|
|
- Eugenia Richard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IRS Insights A closer look. In this issue: District Court Determines IRS Exceeded Regulatory Limit on FBAR Penalties... 1 Internal Revenue Service Issues Guidelines for IRS Chief Counsel on Supervisory Approval of Penalties... 2 District Court Determines IRS Exceeded Regulatory Limit on FBAR Penalties The United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Austin Division ( District Court ) recently ruled the Internal Revenue Service ( IRS ) acted arbitrarily and capriciously in assessing penalties for willful failure to file Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts ( FBAR ) in excess of the $100,000 per account amount set forth in 31 CFR even though the statute allowed an FBAR penalty assessment of the higher of $100,000 or 50% of the maximum amount in the unreported foreign account. The District Court held that although the enabling statute of 31 CFR 5321 had been revised to increase the maximum potential penalty, 31 CFR could be read consistently with the revised statute and thus was still valid. Accordingly, the IRS was bound to maximum penalty of $100,000 as set forth in 31 CFR Background The Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970, commonly known as the Bank Secrecy Act ( BSA ) requires US financial institutions to assist the US government agencies in detecting and preventing money laundering. 1 Pursuant to Section 5314 and 31 CFR , 2 a US person is required to report a financial interest, or signature or other authority, over foreign financial accounts with an aggregate value of at least $10,000 at any time during the 1 31 USC 5311 et seq. 2 This implementing regulation was originally 31 CFR IRS Insights Page 1 of 5 Copyright 2018 Deloitte Development LLC
2 reporting period. A US person is required to report these items on a Form 114 3, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Account (FBAR), filed on a calendar year basis. 4 Under 31 USC 5321, a person who fails to timely file an FBAR will be subject to penalties. The amount of potential penalty varies based upon the type of violation, such as willful or non-willful. 5 The authority to enforce FBAR provisions, including assessing civil penalties, was delegated from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ( FinCEN ), a bureau of the Department of the Treasury, to the Internal Revenue Service in Willful Failure to File FBARs In this case, the IRS assessed penalties for willful failure to file FBARs for tax years 2007 through 2010 against Mr. Dominique G. Colliot ( Taxpayer ). The IRS assessed penalties for the four periods at issue, but the court was focused on the 2007 and 2008 penalties in the following respective amounts: $548,773 and $196,082. The Taxpayer asserted the IRS violated 31 CFR in asserting penalties in excess of $100,000 for these two periods and filed for summary judgment. The District Court first set forth the legislative history and noted prior to 2004, 31 USC 5321(a)(5) allowed the Secretary of Treasury to impose civil penalties amounting to the greater of $25,000 or the balance in the unreported account up to $100,000 for willful violations of Section CFR (renumbered to 31 CFR ) reiterates that the penalty for any willful violation of the requirements of 31 CFR was capped at $100,000. However, in 2004, 31 USC 5321(a)(5) was revised to provide for a minimum penalty of $100,000 and maximum of fifty percent of balance in the account for willful failure to file FBARs. The IRS asserted that the revision to 31 USC 5314 in essence invalidated 31 CFR , thus it was not bound to the lower penalty amounts set forth in 31 CFR The District Court noted that for a regulation to be valid, the regulation must be consistent with the statute. The District Court interpreted 31 USC 5314 to cap the maximum penalty at fifty percent of the unreported account value, however, it stated that 31 USC 5314 did not impose a floor on the maximum penalty amount. Accordingly, the interpretation in 31 CFR to impose only a $100,000 maximum penalty was not in conflict with 31 USC 5314, as it did not exceed the statutory cap. The District Court further held that as 31 CFR was valid and had been promulgated pursuant to the noticeand-comment procedures, then any revocation of 31 CFR would have to be based on same procedures. As 31 CFR had not been revoked, it was still valid and the IRS was bound by the limits imposed by the regulation. Accordingly, the District Court held the IRS has acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it imposed penalties in excess of $100,000 for tax years 2007 and 2008 against the Taxpayer. The District Court did not rule on the appropriate relief and instead requested the parties input regarding the proper next steps. This case presents a question that may become more prevalent pursuant to the passage of the legislation P.L , commonly known as Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 ( TCJA ). The TCJA revised a significant number of statutory provisions, which may have final or temporary regulations promulgated under the prior version of the statutes. As this case illustrates, a court may look towards whether a regulation is consistent with the statute and not invalidate a prior regulation, regardless of subsequent statutory revisions. Internal Revenue Service Issues Guidelines for IRS Chief Counsel on Supervisory Approval of Penalties On June 6, 2018, the Internal Revenue Service ( IRS ) released Chief Counsel Notice ( Notice ), which provides guidance to IRS Office of Chief Counsel attorneys ( Chief Counsel ) on how to address compliance with 3 For the periods at issue, the form was a TD F USC 5314; 31 CFR USC Memorandum of Agreement and Delegation of Authority for Enforcement of FBAR Requirements, dated April 8, IRS Insights Page 2 of 5 Copyright 2018 Deloitte Development LLC
3 Section 6751(b) when handling penalties in litigation, such as deficiency cases, collection due process cases, Tax Equity and Responsibility Act of 1982 ( TEFRA ) proceedings, and refund cases. Background Under Section 6751(b)(1), no penalty shall be assessed unless the initial determination of the penalty assessment is personally approved, in writing, by the immediate supervisor of the individual making the penalty determination. In this context, penalty is defined in broad terms to include any addition to tax or additional amount under Title 26; however, the following types of penalties are statutorily exempted: Section , Section , Section and other penalties automatically calculated through electronic means. In Graev v. Comm r., 149 T.C. 23 (2017) ( Graev III ), the Tax Court determined, in a deficiency case, that written supervisory approval must occur no later than the date the IRS mails the notice of deficiency or files an answer or amended answer asserting penalties. Further, Graev III held the IRS has the burden of production for supervisory approval, thus must provide support. 10 The Second Circuit had also examined the issue in Chai v. Comm r., 851 F.3d 190 (2nd Cir. 2017), and held that the IRS had the burden of proof with regards to Section 6751(b). 11 IRS Chief Counsel Notice Whether the IRS bears a burden of production in cases, i.e. must affirmatively introduce evidence to support the penalty, was at issue in both Graev III and Chai. The Notice states the IRS should not dispute that Section 6751(b)(1) compliance is part of the burden of production under Section 7491(c) 12 for individual taxpayers. In accordance, the Notice instructs Chief Counsel to introduce evidence of the supervisory approval for individual taxpayer, and as a best practice, to also provide support in the cases of entity taxpayers. Importantly, the Notice states that if the IRS bears the burden of production and Chief Counsel cannot obtain proof of proper supervisory approval, then the penalty must be conceded. The Notice also reiterates that Section 6751(b)(1) does not apply to any additions to tax under Sections 6651, 6654, or 6655, or penalties that are automatically calculated through electronic means. The Notice states the IRS position that any addition to tax under Section 6651 includes any subsection of section 6651, such as the Section 6651(a)(1) addition to tax for failure to file, the Section 6651(a)(2) and (3) additions to tax for failure to pay, and the Section 6651(f) addition to tax for fraudulent failure to file. Additionally, the Notice states that penalties set forth on a notice of deficiency pursuant to an automated program, such as the Automated Underreporter ( AUR ) and Combined Annual Reporting Wage Reporting ( CAWR ) program, qualify for the exemption of automated penalties. However, the Notice importantly distinguishes between penalties assessed through pure electronic means and penalties assessed after the taxpayer responds to an initial notice, either in writing or by other means. If a taxpayer contests a penalty prior to the issuance of the notice of deficiency and an IRS employee evaluates the response, then the penalty determination is no longer fully automated. In those cases, the IRS must then follow the procedures for Section 6751(b). Deficiency Proceedings: The Notice provides that if there is a Tax Court deficiency cases with a penalty is at issue, then Chief Counsel should submit evidence of written supervisory approval, regardless of whether the taxpayer raises the issue. Furthermore, the Notice clarifies the supervisory approval must either be prior to the (1) mailing of the 7 Section 6651 sets forth additions to tax for certain items, such as failure to timely pay tax or failure to timely file an income tax return. 8 Section 6654 sets forth an addition to tax for an individual that fails to pay estimated income tax. 9 Section 6655 sets forth an addition to tax for a corporation that fails to pay estimated income tax. 10 For additional discussion regarding Graev v. Comm r., 149 T.C. 23 (2017) and Chai v. Comm r., 851 F.3d 190 (2nd Cir. 2017), see IRS Insights, The Tax Court and the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Reach Contrary Conclusions as to the Section 6751(b)(1) Written-Approval Requirement for Sustaining an Accuracy-Related Penalty. URL: 11 Id. 12 Section 7491(c) provides that the IRS has the burden of production in court proceedings for an individual s liability of penalties, additions of tax and additional amounts imposed by Title 26. IRS Insights Page 3 of 5 Copyright 2018 Deloitte Development LLC
4 notice of deficiency or (2) raised in an answer or amended answer if the penalty was not raised in the notice of deficiency. Depending upon the circumstances, the relevant party to provide immediate supervisory approval may vary. If an attorney reviews a statutory notice of deficiency before it is issued and recommends to include a penalty not originally set forth in the statutory notice of deficiency, then the attorney should obtain approval from their immediate supervisor. The Notice suggests that the attorney should prepare a memorandum, to be signed by the attorney s immediate supervisor, to memorialize the initial penalty recommendation and approval. Collection Due Process Proceedings: The Notice also addresses Collection Due Process ( CDP ) proceedings and states that compliance with Section 6751(b)(1) must be evaluated in all CDP cases. Further, as the Office of IRS Appeals ( Appeals ) is primarily responsible for conducting the CDP proceedings, the Notice provides that Appeals should verify written supervisory approval. If the penalty is at issue in the CDP case, then Appeals must verify compliance with Section 6751(b) as part of the liability determination. The Notice also sets forth guidelines for Chief Counsel relating to CDP cases in litigation. In cases where the liability of the penalty is at issue, then the Notice specifies the IRS bears the burden of production for compliance with Section 6751(b). Regardless of whether the liability is at issue, Chief Counsel should evaluate the evidence of supervisory approval and if necessary, obtain additional documentation. If the Chief Counsel cannot obtain appropriate documentation of supervisory approval, pursuant to Section 6751(b), then generally the IRS should concede the penalty. 13 Partnerships Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 ( TEFRA ): For partnerships subject to TEFRA procedures, the Notice states Chief Counsel should introduce evidence of written supervisory approval, regardless of whether the taxpayer raises the issue. This portion of the Notice may be in response to a court case that evaluated whether Section 6751(b) is applicable to TEFRA cases. In Dynamo Holdings v. Comm r., 150 T.C. No. 10 (May 7, 2018), the Tax Court held that the IRS does not bear the burden of production for partnership cases as it is an entitylevel proceeding, and not an individual s proceeding. However, Section 6751(b) could be raised as a defense to the penalty. The Notice states that written supervisory approval should be submitted where penalties are at issue in the case. Similar to deficiency proceedings, evidence of supervisory approval should be obtained before the mailing of the Final Notice of Administrative Adjustment ( FPAA ). If the penalty is not raised in the FPAA, then it may be raised in an answer or amended answer and the attorney s supervisor should provide the written approval. The Notice states that Chief Counsel should assert written supervisory approval at the partnership level is sufficient compliance with Section 6751(b) in related partner proceedings. Refund Cases: Additionally, the Notice details specific procedures and requirements of Section 6751(b) for refund claims. The Notice clarifies that if the IRS seeks to assert penalties as an offset to refund claims, then supervisory approval is not required. However, in some instance, such as a taxpayer filing suit to seek a refund of a paid penalty, Chief Counsel must address compliance with Section 6751(b) in defense letters to the Department of Justice. The Notice directs Chief Counsel to evaluate whether a section 6751(b)(1) argument was raised in the administrative claim for refund. If the taxpayer did not properly raise Section 6751(b) in its initial refund claim, then Notice provides the variance doctrine may bar the taxpayer from raising the issue for the first time in a refund suit as a taxpayer must set forth all the grounds for the refund in its original claim to apprise the IRS of the grounds. If the grounds are not raised in the refund claim, then generally a taxpayer is barred from later raising the issue in a suit for refund. 13 The Notice provides for a narrow exception if certain judicial doctrines or if Section 6330(c)(4) bars judicial review of supervisory approval. IRS Insights Page 4 of 5 Copyright 2018 Deloitte Development LLC
5 About Deloitte Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee ( DTTL ), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as Deloitte Global ) does not provide services to clients. In the United States, Deloitte refers to one or more of the US member firms of DTTL, their related entities that operate using the Deloitte name in the United States and their respective affiliates. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Please see to learn more about our global network of member firms. Copyright 2018 Deloitte Development LLC. 36 USC IRS Insights Page 5 of 5 Copyright 2018 Deloitte Development LLC
Federal Circuit Affirms FPAA Tolled Statute for Partnership when Losses were Attributable To Another Partnership
IRS Insights A closer look. In this issue: Federal Circuit Affirms FPAA Tolled Statute for Partnership when Losses were Attributable To Another Partnership... 1 IRS Grants Relief for Partnerships Filing
More informationIRS Large Business & International Division Issues Transfer Pricing Guidance
IRS Insights A closer look. In this issue: IRS Large Business & International Division Issues Transfer Pricing Guidance... 1 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Launces ICAP... 3 The
More informationTax Court Holds that Certain Tax Return Information May Be Disclosed to an Employer Asserting a Defense to Withholding Tax
IRS Insights A closer look. In this issue: Tax Court Holds that Certain Tax Return Information May Be Disclosed to an Employer Asserting a Defense to Withholding Tax... 1 The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
More informationDistrict court concludes that taxpayer s refund suit, relating to the carryback of a deduction for foreign taxes, was untimely
IRS Insights A closer look. In this issue: District court concludes that taxpayer s refund suit, relating to the carryback of a deduction for foreign taxes, was untimely... 1 IRS issues Chief Counsel Advice
More informationIRS Provides Guidance on FBAR Penalties
Page 1 of 5 The Tax Adviser IRS Provides Guidance on FBAR Penalties Updated procedures on penalties imposed for failing to file the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts provide consistency and
More informationLaw Office of Lawrence S. Feld 350 West 50th St., Suite 20E New York, N.Y Lawrence S. Feld
Lawrence S. Feld lsfeld@nyc.rr.com Rusudan Shervashidze shervashidze@ruchelaw.com Law Office of Lawrence S. Feld 350 West 50th St., Suite 20E New York, N.Y. 10019 212.586.1293 Ruchelman P.L.L.C. 150 East
More informationIRS Insights A closer look. January In this issue:
IRS Insights A closer look. In this issue: US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rules that a taxpayer and its subsidiary foreign sales corporation are not the same taxpayer for purposes of the interest
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-3-2013 USA v. Edward Meehan Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 11-3392 Follow this and additional
More informationDallas Bar Association Tax Section December 4, New Partnership Audit Rules: What They Mean to Partnerships and Tax Professionals.
Dallas Bar Association Tax Section December 4, 2017 New Partnership Audit Rules: What They Mean to Partnerships and Tax Professionals Copyright All rights reserved. Presented By: Charles D. Pulman, J.D.,
More informationStandards of Services in Tax Matters for Business Taxpayers
Standards of Services in Tax Matters for Business Taxpayers In the course of delivering tax services to our clients or to third parties (you), BST & Co. CPAs, LLP (we or us) applies customary practices
More informationCase 2:17-cv CB Document 28 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:17-cv-01502-CB Document 28 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION ) BUREAU, ) ) Petitioner, ) Civil
More informationState Tax Return PENALTIES FOR GEORGIA TAX RETURN PREPARERS
June 2009 State Tax Return Volume 16 Number 2 PENALTIES FOR GEORGIA TAX RETURN PREPARERS E. Kendrick Smith Shane A. Lord Atlanta Atlanta (404) 581-8343 (404) 581-8055 On March 30, 2009, the Georgia General
More informationsus PETITIONERS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF MAY * MAY US TAX COURT gges t US TAX COURT 7:32 PM LAWRENCE G. GRAEV & LORNA GRAEV, Petitioners,
US TAX COURT gges t US TAX COURT RECEIVED y % sus efiled MAY 31 2017 * MAY 31 2017 7:32 PM LAWRENCE G. GRAEV & LORNA GRAEV, Petitioners, ELECTRONICALLY FILED v. Docket No. 30638-08 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) ) ) Number 2014-04 Mian, Inc. d/b/a Tower Package Store ) Doraville, GA ) ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL
More information11 - Court Rejects Taxpayer's Objections to IRS Collection Actions
11 - Court Rejects Taxpayer's Objections to IRS Collection Actions McAvey, TC Memo 2018-142 The Tax Court has held that IRS did not abuse its discretion with respect to various of its collection actions
More informationIt s Spring and FBAR Reporting Is in the Air
The Expatriate Administrator A publication from KPMG s Global Mobility Services practice It s Spring and FBAR Reporting Is in the Air by Steve Friedman and Timothy McCormally, KPMG LLP, Washington National
More informationMark S. Kaizen /s/ Associate Chief Counsel, General Legal Services. SUBJECT Scope of Awards Payable Under I.R.C. 7623
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL ASSOCIATE CHIEF COUNSEL GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES ETHICS AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT LAW BRANCH (CC:GLS) 1111 CONSTITUTION AVENUE, N.W.
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 5, 2011 Decided June 21, 2011 No. 10-1262 UTAM, LTD. AND DDM MANAGEMENT, INC., TAX MATTERS PARTNER, APPELLEES v. COMMISSIONER
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) ) ) Number 2017-04 Lone Star National Bank ) Pharr, Texas ) ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL MONEY PENALTY
More informationThe Audit is Over Now What?
Where Do We Go From Here: A Comparison of Alternatives When You and the IRS Agree to Disagree JENNY LOUISE JOHNSON, Holland & Knight LLP Co-Chair of Tax Controversy Practice CHARLES E. HODGES, Kilpatrick
More informationFORGIVE AND FORGET - - THE CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT TAX AMNESTY. By Steven Toscher, Esq. March, 1995
FORGIVE AND FORGET - - THE CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT TAX AMNESTY By Steven Toscher, Esq. March, 1995 INTRODUCTION Should a taxing authority be able to forgive and forget - - that is, grant amnesty to taxpayers
More information"It's Not My Fault": Scope of Reasonable Cause And Good Faith Exception to Tax Penalties
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF LAW Presented: 61st Annual Taxation Conference December 4-5, 2013 Austin, Texas "It's Not My Fault": Scope of Reasonable Cause And Good Faith Exception to Tax Penalties
More informationFinancial Crimes Enforcement Network; Amendment to the Bank Secrecy Act Regulations Reports of Foreign Financial Accounts
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/10/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-04880, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Financial Crimes
More informationKOSTELANETZ & FINK, LLP TAX ALERT
KOSTELANETZ & FINK, LLP TAX ALERT Congress Repeals the TEFRA Partnership Audit Rules and Enacts a New Set of Rules Which Includes the Assessment of Income Taxes at the Partnership Level As part of The
More informationRetroactive Regulations
Retroactive Regulations 2018 TEI Tax School May 11, 2018 Houston, Texas Speakers Summer Austin Washington, D.C. summer.austin@bakermckenzie.com Matt Mauney Houston, Texas matthew.mauney@bakermckenzie.com
More informationFederal Income Tax Examinations of Pass-Through Entities
College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository William & Mary Annual Tax Conference Conferences, Events, and Lectures 2006 Federal Income Tax Examinations of Pass-Through
More informationThe Expatriate Administrator
The Expatriate Administrator FBAR reporting: Changes are in the wind June 2016 A publication from KPMGS s Global Mobility Services Practice Given the global trend in tax transparency and the U.S. government
More informationCopyright 2018 Carolina Academic Press. All rights reserved. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOURTH EDITION Letter Update.
Tax Controversies PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOURTH EDITION 2018 Letter Update Leandra Lederman WILLIAM W. OLIVER PROFESSOR OF TAX LAW INDIANA UNIVERSITY MAURER SCHOOL OF LAW Stephen Mazza DEAN UNIVERSITY
More informationPart 4. Examining Process. Chapter 46. LB&I Examination Process. Section 5. Resolving the Examination Resolving the Examination
Part 4. Examining Process Chapter 46. LB&I Examination Process Section 5. Resolving the Examination 4.46.5 Resolving the Examination 4.46.5.1 Overview 4.46.5.2 Issue Resolution 4.46.5.3 Resolution vs.
More informationLAW OFFICE OF JAMES A. NOFI, LLC WHITE PAPER
LAW OFFICE OF JAMES A. NOFI, LLC WHITE PAPER FOREIGN BANKS' CERTIFICATION FOR PURPOSES OF SECTIONS 313 AND 319(b) OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT, 31 U.S.C. 5318(j) and 5318(k) SEPTEMBER 9, 2009 INTRODUCTION In
More informationThis case is referenced in an endnote at the Bradford Tax Institute. CLICK HERE to go to the home page.
This case is referenced in an endnote at the Bradford Tax Institute. CLICK HERE to go to the home page. 123 T.C. No. 16 UNITED STATES TAX COURT TONY R. CARLOS AND JUDITH D. CARLOS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER
More informationCHAPTER 2: WORKING WITH THE TAX LAW
DOWNLOAD FULL TEST BANK FOR SOUTH WESTERN FEDERAL TAXATION 2015 INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAXES 38TH EDITION BY HOFFMAN AND SMITH Link download full: https://testbankservice.com/download/test-bank-for-south-western-federaltaxation-2015-individual-income-taxes-38th-edition-by-hoffman-and-smith/
More informationDoes a Taxpayer Have the Burden of Showing Intent to Divert Corporate Funds as Return of Capital?
Michigan State University College of Law Digital Commons at Michigan State University College of Law Faculty Publications 1-1-2008 Does a Taxpayer Have the Burden of Showing Intent to Divert Corporate
More informationCurrent Federal Tax Developments
Current Federal Tax Developments Week of May 29, 2018 Edward K. Zollars, CPA (Licensed in Arizona) CURRENT FEDERAL TAX DEVELOPMENTS WEEK OF MAY 29, 2018 2018 Kaplan, Inc. Published in 2018 by Kaplan Financial
More informationbe known well in advance of the final IRS determination.
Tax-exempt organizations, however, do not function in a perfect world. When the IRS opens an examination, it usually does so for the earliest tax period for which an organization s statute of limitations
More informationLaw Office of W. Mark Scott, PLLC
The Resurgence of Whistleblowers in IRS Bond Enforcement By: W. Mark Scott I. THERE AND BACK AGAIN The IRS Office of Tax Exempt Bonds received a significant number of whistleblower tips during my tenure
More informationIncome/Franchise: Idaho State Tax Commission Discusses How Recently Enacted Federal Tax Reforms May Affect State Income Taxation
State Tax Matters The power of knowing. In this issue: Income/Franchise: Idaho State Tax Commission Discusses How Recently Enacted Federal Tax Reforms May Affect State Income Taxation... 1 Income/Franchise:
More informationFBAR PENALTY ASSESSMENT AND ENFORCEMENT
FBAR PENALTY ASSESSMENT AND ENFORCEMENT BY: PATRICK J. MCCORMICK Kulzer & DiPadova INTRODUCTION For a number of years, offshore disclosures have been a point of heightened emphasis by the Service, with
More informationU.S. v. HOM, Cite as 113 AFTR 2d (45 F. Supp. 3d 175), Code Sec(s) 6011; 6038D, (DC CA), 06/04/2014
U.S. v. HOM, Cite as 113 AFTR 2d 2014-2325 (45 F. Supp. 3d 175), Code Sec(s) 6011; 6038D, (DC CA), 06/04/2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF v. John C. HOM, DEFENDANT. Case Information: [pg. 2014-2325]
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit MORRIS SHELKOFSKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. 2013-5083 Appeal from the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case 1:16-cv-00106-CCE-JEP Document 60 Filed 07/17/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ALICE J. COGGIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:16-CV-106 ) UNITED
More informationProcedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals
September 25, 1997 Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals By: Glenn Newman This new feature of the New York Law Journal will highlight cases involving New York State and City tax controversies
More informationInternal Revenue Service. PURPOSE (1) This transmits revised IRM , Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) Procedures.
MANUAL TRANSMITTAL Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service 4.26.17 MAY 5, 2008 PURPOSE (1) This transmits revised IRM 4.26.17, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) Procedures.
More informationIRS Large Business & International Division Announces New Campaigns: Seven international campaigns and four domestic campaigns
IRS Insights A closer look. In this issue: IRS Large Business & International Division Announces New Campaigns: Seven international campaigns and four domestic campaigns... 1 IRS grants relief for certain
More informationBURDEN OF PROOF. Shift Happens
BURDEN OF PROOF Shift Happens Overview of Presentation 1. Information Returns 2. Issue Specific 3. Statutory - 7491 4. General Production v. Persuasion Burden of going forward Reasonable person can find
More informationLIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS. PPC s Guide to Dealing with the IRS. Twenty-third Edition (June 2015)
Route To: j Partners j Managers j Staff j File P.O. Box 115008 Carrollton, TX 75011-5008 Tel (972) 250-7750 (800) 431-9025 Fax (888) 216-1929 tax.thomsonreuters.com LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA LTD. Beijing, People s Republic of China and
More informationFBAR Update: Officers and Employees Should Remain Vigilant Pending Regulatory Reform
What s News in Tax Analysis that matters from Washington National Tax FBAR Update: Officers and Employees Should Remain Vigilant Pending Regulatory Reform March 18, 2019 by Steven M. Friedman and Timothy
More information9.37 ATTEMPT TO EVADE OR DEFEAT INCOME TAX (26 U.S.C. 7201)
9.37 ATTEMPT TO EVADE OR DEFEAT INCOME TAX (26 U.S.C. 7201) The defendant is charged in [Count of] the indictment with [specify charge] in violation of Section 7201 of Title 26 of the United States Code.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Peter McLauchlan v. Case: CIR 12-60657 Document: 00512551524 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2014Doc. 502551524 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT PETER A. MCLAUCHLAN, United States
More informationTAX ENGAGEMENT LETTER
TAX ENGAGEMENT LETTER Dear Trustee: We appreciate the opportunity to work with you. In order to avoid any misunderstandings, it is important that the terms of our mutual understanding be clarified. This
More informationCase 2:15-cv RSM Document 56 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cv-000-rsm Document Filed 0// Page of Doc -0 ( pgs) 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, et al.,
More information140 T.C. No. 8 UNITED STATES TAX COURT
140 T.C. No. 8 UNITED STATES TAX COURT WISE GUYS HOLDINGS, LLC, PETER J. FORSTER, TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 6643-12. Filed April 22, 2013.
More information4. Dual Canadian - U.S citizens required to file foreign financial account FBAR disclosure returns annually or face U.S. penalties By Simon Sturm
4. Dual Canadian - U.S citizens required to file foreign financial account FBAR disclosure returns annually or face U.S. penalties By Simon Sturm Under the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act a "U.S. person" with a
More informationUILC: , , , , , ,
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: 200503031 Release Date: 01/21/2005 CC:PA:APJP:B02 ------------ SCAF-119247-04 UILC: 6702.00-00, 6702.01-00, 6611.09-00, 6501.05-00, 6501.05-07,
More informationInformation Reporting and Civil Penalties (in a Nutshell)
I. In General Information Reporting and Civil Penalties (in a Nutshell) By Lucy S. Lee, Esq. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered Washington, D.C. 2008 Lucy S. Lee The Internal Revenue Code (the Code ) 1 generally
More informationFBAR Penalty Assessment and Enforcement
Checkpoint Contents International Tax Library WG&L Journals Journal of International Taxation (WG&L) Journal of International Taxation 2017 Volume 28, Number 08, August 2017 Articles FBAR Penalty Assessment
More informationCase 1:06-cv DLC Document 19 Filed 02/13/2008 Page 1 of 9
Case 106-cv-13248-DLC Document 19 Filed 02/13/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X FALLU PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, -v-
More informationTWELFTH NORTHERN MARIANAS COMMONWEALTH LEGISLATURE AN ACT
TWELFTH NORTHERN MARIANAS COMMONWEALTH LEGISLATURE THIRD REGULAR SESSION, 2001 Public Law 12-51 H. B. NO. 12-345, CD1, SD1 AN ACT To provide a 90-day amnesty period for the filing of delinquent returns
More informationChapter 02 - Working with the Tax Law
1. Rules of tax law do not include Revenue Rulings and Revenue Procedures. Rules of tax law do include Treasury Department pronouncements. 2. A tax professional need not worry about the relative weight
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of U.S. BANCORP Minneapolis, Minnesota and USB AMERICAS HOLDINGS COMPANY Minneapolis,
More informationUNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
24 RS UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC 20217 JOHN M. CRIM, Petitioner(s, v. Docket No. 1638-15 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. ROBERT LIPPOLIS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2017-104 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ROBERT LIPPOLIS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 18172-12W. Filed June 7, 2017. Thomas C. Pliske, for petitioner. Ashley
More informationHOW THE 1998 TAX ACT AFFECTS YOUR DEALINGS WITH THE IRS APPEALS OFFICE. The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998.
HOW THE 1998 TAX ACT AFFECTS YOUR DEALINGS WITH THE IRS APPEALS OFFICE The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 January 22, 1999 Robert M. Kane, Jr. LeSourd & Patten, P.S. 600 University Street, Ste
More informationHOT ISSUES IN CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURES. Stephen J. Dunn 1. funds on deposit at the bank. Cash needed to operate the business and pay
HOT ISSUES IN CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURES Stephen J. Dunn 1 A business receives a call from its bank that the IRS has seized all of the business funds on deposit at the bank. Cash needed to operate the business
More informationTenth Circuit Finds IRS Followed Procedures and Could Proceed with Levy Action. Cropper v. Comm., (CA 10 6/22/2016) 117 AFTR 2d
Tenth Circuit Finds IRS Followed Procedures and Could Proceed with Levy Action Cropper v. Comm., (CA 10 6/22/2016) 117 AFTR 2d 2016-794 The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit concluded that because
More informationSECTION 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure
Rev. Proc. 2002 52 SECTION 1. PURPOSE OF THE REVENUE PROCEDURE SECTION 2. SCOPE.01 In General.02 Requests for Assistance.03 Authority of the U.S. Competent Authority.04 General Process.05 Failure to Request
More informationOffshore Compliance Options including the 2014 OVDP and Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures
Chief Counsel Capital of Texas Enrolled Agents Annual Seminar Austin, Texas November 4, 2015 Offshore Compliance Options including the 2014 OVDP and Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures Dan Price,
More information21 - CA 10 Clarifies TEFRA Partnership Audit SOL and Trial Court Jurisdiction. Omega Forex Group LC et al., (CA 10 10/22/2018) 122 AFTR 2d
21 - CA 10 Clarifies TEFRA Partnership Audit SOL and Trial Court Jurisdiction Omega Forex Group LC et al., (CA 10 10/22/2018) 122 AFTR 2d 2018-5350 The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, affirming
More informationSUMMARY: This document contains temporary regulations relating to the imposition of
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/30/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-27789, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationAfter the FBAR Overhaul: Foreign Account Reporting Enforcement Preparing for IRS Exams, Potential Penalties, Administrative Appeals or Litigation
Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A After the FBAR Overhaul: Foreign Account Reporting Enforcement Preparing for IRS Exams, Potential Penalties, Administrative Appeals or Litigation
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD WESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD WESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE ROBERT J. MACLEAN, Appellant, DOCKET NUMBER SF-0752-06-0611-I-2 v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Agency. DATE: February
More informationTreasury Inspector General for Tax Administration Reports - October, 2018
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration Reports - October, 2018 TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION Office of Audit Highlights THE TAXPAYER PROTECTION PROGRAM INCLUDES PROCESSES
More informationExecutive Summary. Copyright. June 24, M. Robinson & Company, P.C. All Rights Reserved.
Executive Summary IRS Announces Sweeping Changes To Its Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Programs New Rules Effective July 1, 2014 1 On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 the Internal Revenue Service announced sweeping
More informationRegulations under IRC Section 7430 Relating to Awards of Administrative Costs and Attorneys Fees
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/01/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-04401, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationFederal Reserve Bank of Dallas
ll K Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas 2200 N. PEARL ST. DALLAS, TX 75201-2272 October 31, 2003 Notice 03-63 TO: The Chief Executive Officer of each financial institution and others concerned in the Eleventh
More information[ p] Amendments to the Regulations Regarding Questions and Answers Relating to Church Tax Inquiries and Examinations
[4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 301 [REG-112756-09] RIN 1545-BI60 Amendments to the Regulations Regarding Questions and Answers Relating to Church Tax Inquiries
More informationAPA Challenges to Treasury Regulations: Partly Cloudy with a Chance of Success
DID YOU GET YOUR BADGE SCANNED? APA Challenges to Treasury Regulations: Partly Cloudy with a Chance of Success Panelists Starling Marshall, Covington & Burling LLP Gil Rothenberg, Department of Justice,
More informationCase 2:15-cv DN-EJF Document 335 Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 31
Case 2:15-cv-00828-DN-EJF Document 335 Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 31 Denver C. Snuffer, Jr. (#3032) denversnuffer@gmail.com Steven R. Paul (#7423) spaul@nsdplaw.com Daniel B. Garriott (#9444) dbgarriott@msn.com
More informationExtension of Time to File Certain Information Returns. SUMMARY: This document contains final and temporary regulations
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/13/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-19932, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationthe possibility of a will perform for you. In either to obtain credit or for any other advice.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTT -American Institute of CPAs -Colorado Society of CPAs December 27, 2016 Dear, Our office is pleased to provide you with professional tax services. To minimize the possibility
More informationUnited States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals
Cite as: Matter of Robra Construction, Inc., SBA No. VET-160 (2009) United States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals IN THE MATTER OF: Robra Construction, Inc. Appellant SBA No.
More informationWhat Happened to My Prepayment Forum? The Penalty Problem in TEFRA Partnership Audit Cases
Originally published in: Journal of Taxation May, 2008 What Happened to My Prepayment Forum? The Penalty Problem in TEFRA Partnership Audit Cases By: Elliot Pisem Since 1924, when Congress established
More informationIC Chapter 2. Farm Mutual Insurance Companies
IC 27-5.1-2 Chapter 2. Farm Mutual Insurance Companies IC 27-5.1-2-0.1 Application of certain amendments to chapter Sec. 0.1. The amendments made to section 8 of this chapter by P.L.137-2006 and P.L.162-2006
More informationManaging Tax Audits and Appeals September 22, 2016 Marina del Rey
Managing Tax Audits and Appeals 2016 September 22, 2016 Marina del Rey Privilege and Work Product Developments David J. Fischer - 3 - Privilege 101 Attorney-client privilege: Communications between an
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK IN THE MATTER OF: Number 2015-05 Ripple Labs Inc. San Francisco, California XRP II, LLC Columbia, South Carolina
More informationTAX ENGAGEMENT LETTER
TAX ENGAGEMENT LETTER Dear Tax Client, We appreciate the opportunity to work with you. In order to avoid any misunderstandings, it is important that the terms of our mutual understanding be clarified.
More informationReporting Requirements of U.S. Persons Connected to Foreign Trusts and of Delaware (Foreign) Trusts 1
Reporting Requirements of U.S. Persons Connected to Foreign Trusts and of Delaware (Foreign) Trusts 1 Dina Kapur Sanna 2 This outline describes the reporting requirements applicable to U.S. persons who
More informationCase 2:14-mc JCC-BAT Document 1 Filed 12/22/14 Page 1 of 6
Case :-mc-00-jcc-bat Document Filed // Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. STEVEN A. BALLMER, Respondent. Case
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL MONEY PENALTY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) ) ) Number 2017-02 Merchants Bank of California, N.A. ) Carson, California ) ASSESSMENT OF
More information11 USC 505. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 11 - BANKRUPTCY CHAPTER 5 - CREDITORS, THE DEBTOR, AND THE ESTATE SUBCHAPTER I - CREDITORS AND CLAIMS 505. Determination of tax liability (a) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection,
More informationAlter Ego of Law Firm was Liable for Its Unpaid Employment Taxes
Alter Ego of Law Firm was Liable for Its Unpaid Employment Taxes Western Management, Inc. v. U.S., (CA FC 12/12/2012) 110 ATR 2d 2012-5528 Over one dissent, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
More informationTax Matters Partner: Power & Responsibility Partnership Committee American Bar Association, Tax Section January 21, 2011
Tax Matters Partner: Power & Responsibility Partnership Committee American Bar Association, Tax Section January 21, 2011 1. Scope a. The term Tax Matters Partner carries meaning only within TEFRA unified
More informationDRAFT FINAL FORM REGULATION DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE # (IRRC #2750) AMENDED REPORT-CORPORATION TAXES
DRAFT FINAL FORM REGULATION DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE #15-445 (IRRC #2750) AMENDED REPORT-CORPORATION TAXES ^d-iso D' COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL November 2, 2009 Ms.
More informationJudicial Deference to the IRS
Supreme Court Holds that Chevron Deference Applies to Interpretive Treasury Regulations SUMMARY On January 11, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court held, in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v.
More informationC A R A S & S H U L M A N, P C C e r t i f i e d P u b l i c A c c o u n t a n t s B u s i n e s s A d v i s o r s
C A R A S & S H U L M A N, P C C e r t i f i e d P u b l i c A c c o u n t a n t s B u s i n e s s A d v i s o r s Dear Client: Subject: 2016 Tax Engagement Letter This letter is to confirm and specify
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. KENNETH L. MALLORY AND LARITA K. MALLORY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2016-110 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KENNETH L. MALLORY AND LARITA K. MALLORY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 14873-14. Filed June 6, 2016. Joseph A. Flores,
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. EDWARD S. FLUME, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2017-21 UNITED STATES TAX COURT EDWARD S. FLUME, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent Docket No. 15772-14L. Filed January 30, 2017. David Rodriguez, for petitioner.
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-5045 JADE TRADING, LLC, by and through, ROBERT W. ERVIN and LAURA KAVANAUGH ERVIN on behalf of ERVIN CAPITAL, LLC, Partners Other Than the Tax
More informationRepresenting the Innocent Spouse in Pre- and Post-Filing Tax Controversies
Representing the Innocent Spouse in Pre- and Post-Filing Tax Controversies Presented to CPA Academy Lawrence A. Sannicandro, Esq. 1 Overview I. Introduction II. Conflicts of Interest III. Overview of Innocent
More information