Tax Matters Partner: Power & Responsibility Partnership Committee American Bar Association, Tax Section January 21, 2011

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Tax Matters Partner: Power & Responsibility Partnership Committee American Bar Association, Tax Section January 21, 2011"

Transcription

1 Tax Matters Partner: Power & Responsibility Partnership Committee American Bar Association, Tax Section January 21, Scope a. The term Tax Matters Partner carries meaning only within TEFRA unified partnership audit and redetermination proceedings. See I.R.C i. General rule: All partnerships required to file a return are TEFRA partnerships. I.R.C. 6231(a)(1)(A). 1. Exception: small partnerships are generally not subject to TEFRA proceedings. I.R.C. 6231(a)(1)(B). Small partnerships have ten or fewer partners, each of whom is an: a. Individual (other than a nonresident alien), b. C corporation, or c. Estate. 2. Exclusion from the exception: All partnerships with pass-thru partners are TEFRA partnerships. Treas. Reg (a)(1)- 1(a)(2); Rev. Rul (disregarded entity wholly owned by individual is a pass-thru partner, so five-partner partnership is subject to TEFRA proceedings). 3. Election: a small partnership may elect into TEFRA. I.R.C. 6231(a)(1)(B)(ii). Once made, the election remains valid until revoked. 2. What Does the Tax Matters Partner Do? a. The TMP generally represents the partnership before the Internal Revenue Service, and the TMP enjoys the first option to represent the partnership in federal civil tax litigation. But every partner has a right to participate in a TEFRA proceeding, both in the administrative and judicial phases. See, e.g. I.R.C. 6224(a); Tax Court Rule 247. b. The TMP is required, by regulation, to keep the partners informed of the partnership proceedings. See generally Treas. Reg (g)-1. 1

2 3. Who May Be a Tax Matters Partner? a. A general partner. I.R.C. 6231(a)(7)(A); Treas. Reg (a)(7)-1; Transpac Drilling Venture v. Commissioner, 16 F.3d 383 (Fed. Cir. 1994) (rejecting TMP designation made by limited partners). i. A member-manager of a limited liability corporation is deemed to be a general partner. Treas. Reg (a)(7) If no member-manager is identified in operating agreement, any member may be TMP. b. General partner may be TMP only if that person was a general partner at some time during the tax year at issue, or is a general partner at the time of the designation. c. An indirect partner may be a TMP. PAE Enterprises v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo This option is only available to the IRS, not the partnership, in almost all cases other than when a partner holds its partnership interest through a disregarded entity. A disregarded entity owned by a general partner or a disregarded entity owned by a managing-member may be a TMP. Rev. Rul Therefore, a 0% general partner wholly owned by a partner with a profits or capital interest may be TMP. d. A non-u.s. person may become TMP only with the consent of IRS. Treas. Reg (a)(7)-1(b)(2). 4. How Does a Partnership Designate a TMP? a. Designation or termination of TMP must follow the terms of Treas. Reg (a)(7)-1. Three options to designate TMP: i. Designate TMP on partnership return; ii. Certification by current TMP of successor TMP; or iii. Designation of TMP by general partners with majority of general partners profits interest. b. Actions taken by a partner after TMP status has been terminated do not bind the partnership. Termination events: i. Death of TMP; ii. Incompetence of TMP declared by court; 2

3 iii. Liquidation or dissolution of TMP; iv. Partnership items become nonpartnership items under I.R.C. 6231(c) (e.g., partner files bankruptcy). See Treas. Reg (c)-7, Computer Programs Lambda Ltd. V. Commissioner, T.C. Memo ). But see I.R.C. 6229(b)(2)(providing that an extension of the period of limitations that was executed by a bankrupt TMP will be binding on all partners unless the IRS is properly notified of the bankruptcy). v. Resignation of TMP, subsequent certification or designation of a new TMP, or a revocation. c. Criminal investigation of the TMP does not automatically terminate TMP status, Chef s Choice Product Ltd. V. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 388 (1990), but written notification that TMP is the subject of IRS criminal investigation and notice of conversion of partnership items to nonpartnership items under Treas. Reg (c)-5 does terminate TMP status. d. A partner with a disabling conflict of interest with the partnership cannot act as TMP if IRS knows of the conflict. See, e.g., In re Martinez, 366 B.R. 604 (E.D. La. 2007). But see River City Ranches #1 Ltd. V. Commissioner, T.C. Memo (no disabling conflict). 5. What Happens if There Is No TMP (or TMP is Terminated with No Replacement)? a. The regulations provide ordering rules for IRS to select a TMP: i. The general partner with the largest profits interest will be selected based on Schedules K-1 filed for the year at issue. Treas. Reg (a)(7)- 1(m)(2), Rev. Proc , C.B ii. IRS will select a TMP if the general partner with the largest profits interest cannot be determined, or if that person is disqualified (suspended from practice, incarcerated, outside the U.S., or cannot be located). See Treas. Reg (a)(7)-1(p)(1), -1(p)(3). iii. IRS may select a limited partner to serve as TMP if no general partner is eligible. Treas. Reg (a)(7)-1(p)(3)(ii). 3

4 6. What Are the Responsibilities of the TMP? a. Generally, the TMP must give partners notice of all significant events in a TEFRA partnership proceeding. Nevertheless, TMP s failure to do so does not affect the validity of the proceedings or determinations. Vander Heide v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo b. Specific Notice Obligations: i. Under Treas. Reg (g)-1(a), the TMP must furnish the following items to all partners who are not entitled to notice from the Service under I.R.C (i.e., to all partners who are in a partnership with more than 100 partners and who have less than a one percent interest in the partnership s profits): 1. The notice of beginning of the partnership proceeding (or NBAP ); and 2. The notice of final partnership administrative adjustment (or FPAA ). ii. Under Treas. Reg (g)-1(b)(1), TMP must furnish information concerning the following items to all notice partners and all representatives of five-percent notice groups : 1. The closing conference with the examining agent; 2. Proposed adjustments, rights of appeal, and requirements for filing a protest; 3. The time and place of any Appeals conference; 4. The acceptance by the Service of any settlement offer; 5. Consent to the extension of the period of limitations with respect to all partners; 6. Filing of a request for administrative adjustment on the partnership s behalf; 7. Filing by the TMP or any other partner of any petition for judicial review under I.R.C or 6228(a); 8. Filing of any appeal with respect to any judicial determination provided for in I.R.C or 6228(a); and 9. Final judicial redetermination. 4

5 iii. I.R.C. 6230(e) requires the TMP to furnish the name, address, profits interest, and taxpayer identification numbers for all partners to the Service upon receiving an NBAP. iv. I.R.C. 6223(g) requires the TMP to keep each partner informed of all administrative and judicial proceedings for the adjustment at the partnership level of partnership items. v. Tax Court Rule 241(f)(1) requires the TMP to send notice of filing of all Tax Court petitions to all other partners in the partnership within five days after receiving the Tax Court s Notification of Receipt of Petition. vi. Tax Court Rule 241(f)(2) requires the TMP to notify all partners of a Tax Court petition even when the TMP was not the partner who filed the petition within five days of receiving the petition from the petitioning partner. vii. Tax Court Rule 241(g) requires the TMP to provide -- to any partner who makes a request -- a copy of any Tax Court petition to the requesting partner. viii. During the Tax Court proceeding, the court and the parties must directly serve the TMP with all papers, even if the TMP did not file the petition. Tax Court Rule 246. ix. The TMP -- who has the authority to settle a Tax Court case on behalf of all the partners -- must communicate the settlement and solicit responses from all of the partners before entering into the Tax Court decision. Tax Court Rule What are the Inherent Powers of the TMP? a. Choice of Forum i. I.R.C. 6226(a) grants the first choice of forum to the TMP, who has 90 days from receiving the FPAA to file a petition in the Tax Court, the district court, or the Claims Court. A TMP with a small stake may choose district court despite inability of other partners to pay. (IRS will assess and collect from the other partners). Note that, although a TMP may also be permitted to file a petition during the subsequent 60-day period, by doing so the TMP loses the ability to select the forum. ii. I.R.C. 6228(a) gives the TMP the choice of forum if the Service disallows any part of an administrative adjustment request filed by the TMP on behalf of the partnership. 5

6 b. Settlement i. I.R.C. 6224(c)(3)(A) provides that the TMP can enter into a binding settlement agreement at the administrative stage of the TEFRA proceeding, but the settlement only binds non-notice partners. ii. If a non-notice partner files a no-settlement statement with the Service, he is not bound by the TMP s settlement. I.R.C. 6224(c)(3)(B). iii. Tax Court Rule 248(a) gives the TMP the authority to bind all partners in the partnership to a settlement reflected in a Tax Court decision. c. Statute of Limitations i. Under I.R.C. 6229(b)(1)(B), the TMP has the power to execute an extension of the statute of limitations for the partnership items and affected items of all partners in the partnership. d. Substituted Returns i. TMP may file a request for an administrative adjustment (AAR), and request that the AAR be treated as a substituted return. I.R.C. 6227(c)(1). If IRS accepts the request, the adjustments will be treated as computational adjustment (that is, not subject to TEFRA or deficiency proceedings.) IRS rarely agrees to this. 8. Some Partnership Agreements Give the TMP Too Much Power Examples and War Stories a. Tax shelters where promoter is the TMP. See, e.g., Philips v. Commissioner, 272 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2001) (Hoyt partnerships). b. TMP with no stake in the fight. c. TMP leaves the partnership (or liquidates), and there is no general partner leftto replace him. d. TMP behaves badly (no notice to other partners, conflict of interest, etc.) e. TMP with power to make all tax elections including 704(b) book up election that dramatically changed how Cancellation Of Debt (COD) income would be allocated because book up would have reversed prior losses with non-taxable book-up income vs. taxable COD income if no book up. 6

7 9. Top Mistakes when Drafting Tax Matters Section of Partnership Agreement a. Appointing an ineligible TMP, including limited partners, non-managing members, and non-partners; b. Too narrowly, or too broadly, defining who may be TMP; i. Consider limiting TMP designations to partners who have an economic interest in any tax dispute arising in a given year. For example, the TMP rules permit the partners to designate someone as TMP if that person is a partner at the time the designation is made regardless of whether that person was a partner during the year at issue. That person, however, may not have an interest in a tax dispute. Therefore: 1. Designate someone who has an interest in the potential tax dispute or 2. Draft the agreement in such a way that the person who has an interest in the potential tax dispute is eligible to be designated as TMP later if such a dispute should arise. c. Imposing no restriction on TMP s ability to extend the statute of limitations or choose litigation forums; i. While these restrictions may give rise to a cause of action against a TMP who violates them, it is not clear that they have any affect on the validity of the TMP s actions. d. Failing to provide how costs of TEFRA proceedings, including litigation, will be covered; e. Giving TMP power to make substantive tax elections with little or no limitation; f. Failing to provide deadlines for partners and the partnership to provide information to each other; g. Failing to provide for minimum tax distributions if necessary (when TMP chooses district court litigation, for instance). 7

8 10. Common Myths a. Only TMP can sign the return. b. The TMP can settle the partnership examination on behalf of the partners. c. A manager (non-member) can be a TMP. d. Query: Can a partner with no economic stake in the tax year at issue (e.g., 0% G.P. be a TMP? 11. Other Planning Considerations a. Controlling the proceeding while having a negligible interest i. A member-manager can have a very small interest and be designated as TMP. Thus, for example, if the members want a non-member to be TMP, granting a very small membership interest is sufficient to be able to designate that member as TMP. b. Controlling a prior year i. A newly admitted member may be designated as TMP for prior years. This often enables an entity to admit a member (effectively) for the purpose of controlling the proceeding. c. Contracting TMP responsibilities i. If the person who the members want to be TMP cannot own an economic interest or cannot be a general partner or member manager, the parties can by contract agree that the designated TMP will be bound to take direction from the non-member. d. Minimizing deposits i. TMP designations can be changed up until the moment of filing a court petition for the purpose of affecting: 1. The amount of the necessary jurisdictional deposit. 2. Who controls the proceeding. 8

Federal Income Tax Examinations of Pass-Through Entities

Federal Income Tax Examinations of Pass-Through Entities College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository William & Mary Annual Tax Conference Conferences, Events, and Lectures 2006 Federal Income Tax Examinations of Pass-Through

More information

TEFRA Audits and Refund Claims

TEFRA Audits and Refund Claims ACPEN NETWORK BROADCAST PARTNERSHIP AND LLCs UPDATE OCTOBER 26, 2011 TEFRA Audits and Refund Claims Robert D. Probasco Thompson & Knight LLP 1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 http://www.tklaw.com

More information

Partnership Audits. Crowell & Moring, LLP. Gregory Armstrong, Senior Technician Reviewer, Office of Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration)

Partnership Audits. Crowell & Moring, LLP. Gregory Armstrong, Senior Technician Reviewer, Office of Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration) Partnership Audits Crowell & Moring, LLP Gregory Armstrong, Senior Technician Reviewer, Office of Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration) Jennifer Ray, Partner, Crowell & Moring, LLP September 29, 2016

More information

Dallas Bar Association Tax Section December 4, New Partnership Audit Rules: What They Mean to Partnerships and Tax Professionals.

Dallas Bar Association Tax Section December 4, New Partnership Audit Rules: What They Mean to Partnerships and Tax Professionals. Dallas Bar Association Tax Section December 4, 2017 New Partnership Audit Rules: What They Mean to Partnerships and Tax Professionals Copyright All rights reserved. Presented By: Charles D. Pulman, J.D.,

More information

ESTATE PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION FOR S CORPORATIONS

ESTATE PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION FOR S CORPORATIONS ESTATE PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION FOR S CORPORATIONS I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. ALLOCATING INCOME IN THE YEAR OF DEATH... 1 III. SHAREHOLDER ELIGIBILITY... 2 A. Estates... 2 B. Certain Trusts... 3 1. Grantor

More information

AMC 2017 Session 8 Track C Partnership and Operating Agreements Must Change: The Impact of the New IRS Partnership Audit Rules

AMC 2017 Session 8 Track C Partnership and Operating Agreements Must Change: The Impact of the New IRS Partnership Audit Rules ` AMC 2017 Session 8 Track C Partnership and Operating Agreements Must Change: The Impact of the New IRS Partnership Audit Rules Alison E. Helland, Murphy Desmond S.C., Madison Robert A. Mathers, von Briesen

More information

DALLAS BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION

DALLAS BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION DALLAS BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION DECEMBER 4, 2017 DALLAS, TX NEW PARTNERSHIP AUDIT RULES: WHAT THEY MEAN TO PARTNERSHIPS AND TAX PROFESSIONALS Presented by: CHARLES D. PULMAN, J.D., LL.M., CPA MATTHEW

More information

Tax News and Industry Updates

Tax News and Industry Updates 2018 Volume 6, Issue 1 Tax News and Industry Updates Rusty Walser Tax Service 385 Longmeadow Drive Clemmons, NC 27012 Standard Mileage Rate Rev. Proc. 2010-51 Notice 2016-01 Notice 2016-79 Notice 2018-03

More information

Partnership Audit Procedures Under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015

Partnership Audit Procedures Under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 Partnership Audit Procedures Under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 INTRODUCTION The Internal Revenue Service ( IRS ) currently audits most partnerships under rules enacted in the Tax Equity and Fiscal

More information

The new rules are generally effective for partnership audits of tax years beginning after December 31, 2017.

The new rules are generally effective for partnership audits of tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. Please be aware that the following responses to FAQ s are based upon the statutory legislation and related guidance in the form of enacted and proposed regulations existing as of October 16, 2018. What

More information

CENTRALIZED PARTNERSHIP AUDIT REGIME NOW EFFECTIVE

CENTRALIZED PARTNERSHIP AUDIT REGIME NOW EFFECTIVE CENTRALIZED PARTNERSHIP AUDIT REGIME NOW EFFECTIVE The Now Effective Centralized Partnership Audit Regime for Partnership Taxable Years Beginning After December 31, 2017 JAMES USSEGLIO, Tax Principal (Originally

More information

Partnership Representative under the Centralized Partnership Audit Regime and. ACTION: Final regulation and removal of temporary regulations.

Partnership Representative under the Centralized Partnership Audit Regime and. ACTION: Final regulation and removal of temporary regulations. This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/09/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-17002, and on govinfo.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

More information

The BBA Partnership Audit Rules. What you need to know today to prepare for the new partnership audit regime under the BBA

The BBA Partnership Audit Rules. What you need to know today to prepare for the new partnership audit regime under the BBA What you need to know today to prepare for the new partnership audit regime under the BBA Disclaimer This presentation is provided solely for the purpose of enhancing knowledge on tax matters. It does

More information

KOSTELANETZ & FINK, LLP TAX ALERT

KOSTELANETZ & FINK, LLP TAX ALERT KOSTELANETZ & FINK, LLP TAX ALERT Congress Repeals the TEFRA Partnership Audit Rules and Enacts a New Set of Rules Which Includes the Assessment of Income Taxes at the Partnership Level As part of The

More information

Rev. Proc CONTENTS SECTION 1. PURPOSE

Rev. Proc CONTENTS SECTION 1. PURPOSE 26 CFR 601.204: Changes in accounting periods and in methods of accounting. (Also Part I, 441, 442, 444, 706, 1378; 1.441 1, 1.441 3, 1.442 1, 1.706 1, 1.1378 1.) Rev. Proc. 2002 38 CONTENTS SECTION 1.

More information

Revenue Procedure 97-27

Revenue Procedure 97-27 CLICK HERE to return to the home page Revenue Procedure 97-27 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. PURPOSE.01 In general.02 Voluntary compliance.03 Significant changes SECTION 2. BACKGROUND.01 Change in method

More information

New Partnership Audit Rules Require Attention

New Partnership Audit Rules Require Attention New Partnership Audit Rules Require Attention Michael Hirschfeld and Thomas R. McDonnell, Andersen Tax In response to concerns by the IRS about properly auditing partnerships and collecting any resulting

More information

(4) Before afederal court. 14

(4) Before afederal court. 14 26 CFR 601.204: Changes in accounting periods and in methods of accounting. (Also Part I, 446, 481; 1.446 1, 1.481 1, 1.481 4.) Rev. Proc. 97 27 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION 1. PURPOSE... 11.01 In general...

More information

Summary of BBA Provisions

Summary of BBA Provisions I. Introduction MASTERING CORPORATIONS, LLCS, & PARTNERSHIPS NEW TAX AUDIT PROCEDURES FOR PARTNERSHIPS AND LLCS TAXED AS PARTNERSHIPS Norman S. Newmark, JD, LLM (Taxation) AEGIS Professional Services Law

More information

Regulations under IRC Section 7430 Relating to Awards of Administrative Costs and Attorneys Fees

Regulations under IRC Section 7430 Relating to Awards of Administrative Costs and Attorneys Fees This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/01/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-04401, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

More information

H. Compensation. Present Law

H. Compensation. Present Law 1. Nonqualified deferred compensation In general H. Compensation Present Law Compensation may be received currently or may be deferred to a later time. The tax treatment of deferred compensation depends

More information

Howell v. Commissioner TC Memo

Howell v. Commissioner TC Memo CLICK HERE to return to the home page Howell v. Commissioner TC Memo 2012-303 MARVEL, Judge MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION Respondent mailed to petitioners a notice of deficiency dated December

More information

Personal holding companies (See also: Foreign personal holding companies) Affiliated groups; dividend exclusion provision. In deciding whether

Personal holding companies (See also: Foreign personal holding companies) Affiliated groups; dividend exclusion provision. In deciding whether (See also: Foreign personal holding companies) 394.1 Affiliated groups; dividend exclusion provision. In deciding whether an affiliated group of corporations may determine its status as a personal holding

More information

The Audit is Over Now What?

The Audit is Over Now What? Where Do We Go From Here: A Comparison of Alternatives When You and the IRS Agree to Disagree JENNY LOUISE JOHNSON, Holland & Knight LLP Co-Chair of Tax Controversy Practice CHARLES E. HODGES, Kilpatrick

More information

2018, Vol. 14. No. 1, ISSN: /69. Jonathan R. Everhart University of Houston Clear Lake

2018, Vol. 14. No. 1, ISSN: /69. Jonathan R. Everhart University of Houston Clear Lake Small Business Institute Journal Small Business Institute 2018, Vol. 14. No. 1, 44-51 ISSN: 1994-1150/69 Unlimited Tax Liability: A Common Misnomer of Limited Liability Company Taxation in the United States

More information

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Three-year holding period for LTCG treatment on on certain partnership profits interest received in connection with the performance of investment services 1.2 2 Tax Nonresident Partner

More information

11 USC 505. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

11 USC 505. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see TITLE 11 - BANKRUPTCY CHAPTER 5 - CREDITORS, THE DEBTOR, AND THE ESTATE SUBCHAPTER I - CREDITORS AND CLAIMS 505. Determination of tax liability (a) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection,

More information

Information Reporting and Civil Penalties (in a Nutshell)

Information Reporting and Civil Penalties (in a Nutshell) I. In General Information Reporting and Civil Penalties (in a Nutshell) By Lucy S. Lee, Esq. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered Washington, D.C. 2008 Lucy S. Lee The Internal Revenue Code (the Code ) 1 generally

More information

Important Developments in the Federal Income Taxation of S Corporations

Important Developments in the Federal Income Taxation of S Corporations American Bar Association Section of Taxation S Corporation Committee Important Developments in the Federal Income Taxation of S Corporations Boca Raton, Florida January 21, 2011 Dana Lasley Tax Director

More information

District court concludes that taxpayer s refund suit, relating to the carryback of a deduction for foreign taxes, was untimely

District court concludes that taxpayer s refund suit, relating to the carryback of a deduction for foreign taxes, was untimely IRS Insights A closer look. In this issue: District court concludes that taxpayer s refund suit, relating to the carryback of a deduction for foreign taxes, was untimely... 1 IRS issues Chief Counsel Advice

More information

AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE-AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION LIMITED LIABILITY ENTITIES. Presentation on: March 16, 2006

AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE-AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION LIMITED LIABILITY ENTITIES. Presentation on: March 16, 2006 AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE-AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION LIMITED LIABILITY ENTITIES Presentation on: March 16, 2006 SELECTED CURRENT TAX DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING LLCS AND PARTNERSHIPS John R. Maxfield Holland & Hart

More information

Important Developments in the Federal Income Taxation of S Corporations

Important Developments in the Federal Income Taxation of S Corporations American Bar Association Section of Taxation S Corporation Committee Important Developments in the Federal Income Taxation of S Corporations Grand Hyatt Washington, D.C. May 6, 2011 Dana Lasley Tax Director

More information

Internal Revenue Code Section 6013(d)(3) Joint returns of income tax by husband and wife.

Internal Revenue Code Section 6013(d)(3) Joint returns of income tax by husband and wife. Internal Revenue Code Section 6013(d)(3) Joint returns of income tax by husband and wife. CLICK HERE to return to the home page (a) Joint returns. A husband and wife may make a single return jointly of

More information

Prepare for 2019: Issues in Designating a Partnership Representative under the BBA

Prepare for 2019: Issues in Designating a Partnership Representative under the BBA Prepare for 2019: Issues in Designating a Partnership Representative under the BBA Please disable pop-up blocking software before viewing this webcast December 17, 2018 2:00PM EST Speakers Elizabeth Askey

More information

140 T.C. No. 8 UNITED STATES TAX COURT

140 T.C. No. 8 UNITED STATES TAX COURT 140 T.C. No. 8 UNITED STATES TAX COURT WISE GUYS HOLDINGS, LLC, PETER J. FORSTER, TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 6643-12. Filed April 22, 2013.

More information

IRS Issues a Warning to Canadian Law Firms with U.S. Branch Offices

IRS Issues a Warning to Canadian Law Firms with U.S. Branch Offices The Canadian Tax Journal March 1, 2004 IRS Issues a Warning to Canadian Law Firms with U.S. Branch Offices By: Sanford H. Goldberg and Michael J. Miller For over ten years, the position of the Internal

More information

Positions that are the same as or similar to the positions listed in this Notice are

Positions that are the same as or similar to the positions listed in this Notice are Part III - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Frivolous Positions Notice 2007-30 PURPOSE Positions that are the same as or similar to the positions listed in this Notice are identified as frivolous

More information

The New Partnership Audit Regime

The New Partnership Audit Regime The New Partnership Audit Regime October 19, 2017 Small Partnerships Current Rules Partnership audits with 10 or fewer qualified partners (e.g., no flow through entities, like LLCs, as partners) are conducted

More information

Partnership Audits. Crowell & Moring, LLP. Jennifer Ray Teresa Abney October 5, Crowell & Moring 136

Partnership Audits. Crowell & Moring, LLP. Jennifer Ray Teresa Abney October 5, Crowell & Moring 136 Partnership Audits Crowell & Moring, LLP Jennifer Ray Teresa Abney October 5, 2017 Crowell & Moring 136 Partnership taxation Partnership is not subject to income tax Audits Regimes TEFRA (1982) ELP (1997)

More information

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Analyze This. By LG Brooks Enrolled Agent

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Analyze This. By LG Brooks Enrolled Agent The capital of Texas enrolled agents Austin, Texas November 2008 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Analyze This By LG Brooks Enrolled Agent I. BIOGRAPHY LG Brooks, BA, EA LG Brooks is an Enrolled Agent and is the

More information

TAX MEMORANDUM. CPAs, Clients & Associates. David L. Silverman, Esq. Shirlee Aminoff, Esq. DATE: April 2, Attorney-Client Privilege

TAX MEMORANDUM. CPAs, Clients & Associates. David L. Silverman, Esq. Shirlee Aminoff, Esq. DATE: April 2, Attorney-Client Privilege LAW OFFICES DAVID L. SILVERMAN, J.D., LL.M. 2001 MARCUS AVENUE LAKE SUCCESS, NEW YORK 11042 (516) 466-5900 SILVERMAN, DAVID L. TELECOPIER (516) 437-7292 NYTAXATTY@AOL.COM AMINOFF, SHIRLEE AMINOFFS@GMAIL.COM

More information

THE NEW CENTRALIZED PARTNERSHIP AUDIT REGIME: AN OVERVIEW

THE NEW CENTRALIZED PARTNERSHIP AUDIT REGIME: AN OVERVIEW THE NEW CENTRALIZED PARTNERSHIP AUDIT REGIME: AN OVERVIEW By: Kevin M. Henry, Esq. I. WHERE ARE WE NOW? THE TAX EQUITY AND FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT OF 1982 ( TEFRA ) A. Prior to TEFRA, partnership audits

More information

Article from: Taxing Times. May 2012 Volume 8 Issue 2

Article from: Taxing Times. May 2012 Volume 8 Issue 2 Article from: Taxing Times May 2012 Volume 8 Issue 2 Recent Cases on Changes from Erroneous Accounting Methods Do They Apply to Changes in Basis of Computing Reserves? By Peter H. Winslow and Brion D.

More information

CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT SIMPLE IRA

CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT SIMPLE IRA Page 1 of 9 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT PROCEDURES FOR OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT: To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, federal law requires all financial institutions

More information

TEFRA REPEAL ESSENTIAL CHANGES TO PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS AND OPERATING AGREEMENTS

TEFRA REPEAL ESSENTIAL CHANGES TO PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS AND OPERATING AGREEMENTS TEFRA REPEAL ESSENTIAL CHANGES TO PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS AND OPERATING AGREEMENTS TEFRA Repeal Essential Changes to Partnership Agreements and Operating Agreements by Jeramie J. Fortenberry, JD, LL.M (Taxation)

More information

Law Office of W. Mark Scott, PLLC

Law Office of W. Mark Scott, PLLC The Resurgence of Whistleblowers in IRS Bond Enforcement By: W. Mark Scott I. THERE AND BACK AGAIN The IRS Office of Tax Exempt Bonds received a significant number of whistleblower tips during my tenure

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Peter McLauchlan v. Case: CIR 12-60657 Document: 00512551524 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2014Doc. 502551524 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT PETER A. MCLAUCHLAN, United States

More information

SunGard Business Systems LLC Defined Benefit Prototype/Volume Submitter Plan DRAFT 10/30/15

SunGard Business Systems LLC Defined Benefit Prototype/Volume Submitter Plan DRAFT 10/30/15 SunGard Business Systems LLC Defined Benefit Prototype/Volume Submitter Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS ARTICLE II ADMINISTRATION 2.1 POWERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EMPLOYER... 18 2.2

More information

Amending Partnership/ LLC Agreements in Response to New IRS Partnership Audit Rules

Amending Partnership/ LLC Agreements in Response to New IRS Partnership Audit Rules Amending Partnership/ LLC Agreements in Response to New IRS Partnership Audit Rules Effective for tax years beginning in 2018, radically new rules will apply to IRS audits of partnerships and LLC s (that

More information

ADOPTION AGREEMENT CAFETERIA PLAN

ADOPTION AGREEMENT CAFETERIA PLAN ADOPTION AGREEMENT CAFETERIA PLAN The undersigned adopting employer hereby adopts this Plan. The Plan is intended to qualify as a cafeteria plan under Code section 125. The Plan shall consist of this Adoption

More information

THE COMPLETE GUIDE TO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES

THE COMPLETE GUIDE TO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES THE COMPLETE GUIDE TO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES By WAYNE A. HAGENDORF PART ONE CHARACTERISTICS OF A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CHAPTER ONE WHAT IS A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY? I. DESCRIPTION II. HISTORY

More information

Partnership Audit Rules Kristin Balding Gutting Associate Professor, Charleston School of Law

Partnership Audit Rules Kristin Balding Gutting Associate Professor, Charleston School of Law Partnership Audit Rules Kristin Balding Gutting Associate Professor, Charleston School of Law 1 Agenda What are the new partnership audit rules? Overview. Default Rule. Push Out Election. Out with the

More information

NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION REPORT ON TREATMENT OF RESTRICTED STOCK IN CORPORATE REORGANIZATION TRANSACTIONS.

NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION REPORT ON TREATMENT OF RESTRICTED STOCK IN CORPORATE REORGANIZATION TRANSACTIONS. NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION REPORT ON TREATMENT OF RESTRICTED STOCK IN CORPORATE REORGANIZATION TRANSACTIONS October 23, 2003 Report No. 1042 New York State Bar Association Tax Section Report

More information

The Importance of Lingering TEFRA Partnership Procedures:

The Importance of Lingering TEFRA Partnership Procedures: The Importance of Lingering TEFRA Partnership Procedures: Exploring Who Can File Court Petitions and the Consequences for Mistakes By Hale E. Sheppard * Hale E. Sheppard analyzes the transition from TEFRA

More information

Treasury and IRS Re-Release Proposed Regulations on Implementation of New Centralized Partnership Audit Regime

Treasury and IRS Re-Release Proposed Regulations on Implementation of New Centralized Partnership Audit Regime Legal Update June 13, 2017 Treasury and IRS Re-Release Proposed Regulations on Implementation of New Centralized The increasing use of partnerships has posed administrative challenges for the Internal

More information

HOW THE 1998 TAX ACT AFFECTS YOUR DEALINGS WITH THE IRS APPEALS OFFICE. The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998.

HOW THE 1998 TAX ACT AFFECTS YOUR DEALINGS WITH THE IRS APPEALS OFFICE. The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998. HOW THE 1998 TAX ACT AFFECTS YOUR DEALINGS WITH THE IRS APPEALS OFFICE The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 January 22, 1999 Robert M. Kane, Jr. LeSourd & Patten, P.S. 600 University Street, Ste

More information

CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT TRADITIONAL AND SEP IRA

CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT TRADITIONAL AND SEP IRA If establishing a SEP-IRA, please also read the IRS Form 5305-SEP. Page 1 of 10 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT PROCEDURES FOR OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and

More information

Whether an account receivable established by an election to apply Rev. Proc constitutes related party indebtedness under I.R.C. 965(b)(3).

Whether an account receivable established by an election to apply Rev. Proc constitutes related party indebtedness under I.R.C. 965(b)(3). Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: AM2008-010 Release Date: 9/12/2008 CC:INTL:B03:JLParry POSTN-120024-08 UILC: 965.00-00 date: September 04, 2008 to: from: Area Counsel

More information

Federal Circuit Affirms FPAA Tolled Statute for Partnership when Losses were Attributable To Another Partnership

Federal Circuit Affirms FPAA Tolled Statute for Partnership when Losses were Attributable To Another Partnership IRS Insights A closer look. In this issue: Federal Circuit Affirms FPAA Tolled Statute for Partnership when Losses were Attributable To Another Partnership... 1 IRS Grants Relief for Partnerships Filing

More information

WHY YOUR PARTNERSHIP AND LLC OPERATING AGREEMENTS NEED A TUNE-UP IN 2018: THE NEW PARTNERSHIP RULES

WHY YOUR PARTNERSHIP AND LLC OPERATING AGREEMENTS NEED A TUNE-UP IN 2018: THE NEW PARTNERSHIP RULES WHY YOUR PARTNERSHIP AND LLC OPERATING AGREEMENTS NEED A TUNE-UP IN 2018: THE NEW PARTNERSHIP RULES Richard B. Robinson Robinson, Diss and Clowdus, P.C. 303-861-4154 rbrobinson@lektax.com PART I OVERVIEW

More information

ARTICLE * Making the Portability Election Simpler: Rev. Proc , I.R.B. 1282

ARTICLE * Making the Portability Election Simpler: Rev. Proc , I.R.B. 1282 ARTICLE * Making the Portability Election Simpler: Rev. Proc. 207-34, 207-26 I.R.B. 282 Keri D. Brown & Benjamin A. Cohen-Kurzrock On June 0, 207, the I.R.S. released Rev. Proc. 207-34, 207-26 I.R.B. 282,

More information

Post Bruno's Bankruptcy Planning: An Analysis of Taxable Emergence Structures

Post Bruno's Bankruptcy Planning: An Analysis of Taxable Emergence Structures DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal Volume 4 Issue 2 Winter 2006 Article 5 Post Bruno's Bankruptcy Planning: An Analysis of Taxable Emergence Structures Christopher Woll Follow this and additional

More information

*TDAI3204* ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS CLIENT CUSTODY AGREEMENT (PURCHASES) Account #: Advisor Code: AGREEMENT

*TDAI3204* ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS CLIENT CUSTODY AGREEMENT (PURCHASES) Account #: Advisor Code: AGREEMENT ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS CLIENT CUSTODY AGREEMENT (PURCHASES) Account #: Advisor Code: 1 This form is used to purchase Alternative Investments. If you are transferring Alternative Investments to TD Ameritrade,

More information

American Bar Association Section of Taxation S Corporation Committee. Important Developments in the Federal Income Taxation of S Corporations

American Bar Association Section of Taxation S Corporation Committee. Important Developments in the Federal Income Taxation of S Corporations American Bar Association Section of Taxation S Corporation Committee Important Developments in the Federal Income Taxation of S Corporations Hyatt Regency Denver, Colorado October 21, 2011 Dana Lasley

More information

CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT ROTH IRA

CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT ROTH IRA Page 1 of 9 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT PROCEDURES FOR OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, federal law requires all financial institutions

More information

Exam. Final Regulations Empower Partnership Representatives in BBA Partnership Audit Regime. By George A. Hani* I. Introduction

Exam. Final Regulations Empower Partnership Representatives in BBA Partnership Audit Regime. By George A. Hani* I. Introduction GEORGE A. HANI is a Member and Chair of the Tax Department with Miller & Chevalier in Washington, DC. Exam Final Regulations Empower Partnership s in BBA Partnership Audit Regime By George A. Hani* I.

More information

Memorandum. Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service. Number: Release Date: 7/7/2006 CC:PA:APJP:B2:AMIELKE POSTN

Memorandum. Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service. Number: Release Date: 7/7/2006 CC:PA:APJP:B2:AMIELKE POSTN Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: 200627023 Release Date: 7/7/2006 CC:PA:APJP:B2:AMIELKE POSTN-112965-06 UILC: 6166.00-00, 6501.00-00, 6213.02-00, 7479.00-00, 7479.01-02

More information

UILC: , , , , , ,

UILC: , , , , , , Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: 200503031 Release Date: 01/21/2005 CC:PA:APJP:B02 ------------ SCAF-119247-04 UILC: 6702.00-00, 6702.01-00, 6611.09-00, 6501.05-00, 6501.05-07,

More information

BorgWarner Flexible Benefits Plan. Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2017

BorgWarner Flexible Benefits Plan. Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2017 BorgWarner Flexible Benefits Plan Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2017 BorgWarner Inc. FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN Table of Contents Page ARTICLE I INTRODUCTION...1 Section 1.1 Restatement of Plan...1

More information

OPERATING AGREEMENT OF {NAME}

OPERATING AGREEMENT OF {NAME} OPERATING AGREEMENT OF {NAME} THIS OPERATING AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is made this day of, 20, by and among {Name}, an Ohio limited liability company (the Company ), and the undersigned members of the

More information

The Wolfe Law Group Gary S. Wolfe, A Professional Law Corporation. March 18, Expatriation and the Ten Year Rule

The Wolfe Law Group Gary S. Wolfe, A Professional Law Corporation. March 18, Expatriation and the Ten Year Rule The Wolfe Law Group Gary S. Wolfe, A Professional Law Corporation 6303 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TELEPHONE (323) 782-9139 SUITE 201 FACSIMILE (323) 782-9289 LOS ANGELES, CA 90048 E-MAIL gsw@gswlaw.com March 18,

More information

B = C = Distributing 1 = Distributing 2 = Controlled 1 = Controlled 2 =

B = C = Distributing 1 = Distributing 2 = Controlled 1 = Controlled 2 = Internal Revenue Service Number: 200230006 Release Date: 7/26/2002 Index Number: 355.00-00 Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Person to Contact: Telephone Number: Refer Reply To: CC:CORP:1-PLR-158635-01

More information

District Court Determines IRS Exceeded Regulatory Limit on FBAR Penalties

District Court Determines IRS Exceeded Regulatory Limit on FBAR Penalties IRS Insights A closer look. In this issue: District Court Determines IRS Exceeded Regulatory Limit on FBAR Penalties... 1 Internal Revenue Service Issues Guidelines for IRS Chief Counsel on Supervisory

More information

Revenue Procedure 98-1

Revenue Procedure 98-1 Revenue Procedure 98-1 Reprinted from IR Bulletin 1998-1 Dated January 5, 1998 Procedures for Issuing Rulings, Determination Letters, and Information Letters, and for Entering Into Closing Agreements on

More information

What Happened to My Prepayment Forum? The Penalty Problem in TEFRA Partnership Audit Cases

What Happened to My Prepayment Forum? The Penalty Problem in TEFRA Partnership Audit Cases Originally published in: Journal of Taxation May, 2008 What Happened to My Prepayment Forum? The Penalty Problem in TEFRA Partnership Audit Cases By: Elliot Pisem Since 1924, when Congress established

More information

Taxpayer Bill of Rights

Taxpayer Bill of Rights College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository William & Mary Annual Tax Conference Conferences, Events, and Lectures 1989 Taxpayer Bill of Rights Lawrence B. Gibbs

More information

Recent Developments In The IRS Partnership Audit Regime

Recent Developments In The IRS Partnership Audit Regime Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Recent Developments In The IRS Partnership

More information

FIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC STANDARDIZED PROTOTYPE DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN

FIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC STANDARDIZED PROTOTYPE DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN FIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC STANDARDIZED PROTOTYPE DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS ARTICLE II ADMINISTRATION 2.1 POWERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EMPLOYER... 16 2.2 DESIGNATION

More information

S CORPORATION UPDATE By Sydney S. Traum, BBA, JD, LLM, CPA all rights reserved by author.

S CORPORATION UPDATE By Sydney S. Traum, BBA, JD, LLM, CPA all rights reserved by author. 2007-2008 S CORPORATION UPDATE By Sydney S. Traum, BBA, JD, LLM, CPA all rights reserved by author. Portions of this article are adapted from material written by the author for Aspen Publishers loose-leaf

More information

MDG PURCHASE BENEFIT CLUB MEMBER PRIVILEGES & CONDITIONS

MDG PURCHASE BENEFIT CLUB MEMBER PRIVILEGES & CONDITIONS MDG PURCHASE BENEFIT CLUB MEMBER PRIVILEGES & CONDITIONS Note: In this document we will use the name MDG to describe MDG USA Inc. Acceptance of MDG s Purchase Benefit Club Member Privileges and Conditions

More information

LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS. PPC s Guide to Dealing with the IRS. Twenty-third Edition (June 2015)

LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS. PPC s Guide to Dealing with the IRS. Twenty-third Edition (June 2015) Route To: j Partners j Managers j Staff j File P.O. Box 115008 Carrollton, TX 75011-5008 Tel (972) 250-7750 (800) 431-9025 Fax (888) 216-1929 tax.thomsonreuters.com LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS

More information

Internal Revenue Service

Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service Number: 9845012 Release Date: 11/06/1998 Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Third Party Communication: None Date of Communication: Not Applicable Index Number: 0351.00-00;

More information

Guidance Regarding Dispositions of Tangible Depreciable Property. ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations.

Guidance Regarding Dispositions of Tangible Depreciable Property. ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations. This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/18/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-19403, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

More information

Purchase and Sale of Interests; Asset and Stock Acquisitions; Redemptions; and Terminations in Pass-Through Entities

Purchase and Sale of Interests; Asset and Stock Acquisitions; Redemptions; and Terminations in Pass-Through Entities College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository William & Mary Annual Tax Conference Conferences, Events, and Lectures 1994 Purchase and Sale of Interests; Asset and

More information

Offer-in-Compromise Why or Why Not

Offer-in-Compromise Why or Why Not Why or Why Not The Capital of Texas Enrolled Agents November 2010 by: lg brooks, ea Why or Why Not Table of Contents Introduction 3 The Offer Process 4 The Offer in Compromise: Offers in General 4 Grounds

More information

SEATA Presentation. S Corporations. Formation and Termination

SEATA Presentation. S Corporations. Formation and Termination SEATA Presentation S Corporations Formation and Termination 1 IRC 1361(a)(1) Defines an S corporation, with respect to any taxable year, as a small business corporation for which an election under IRC

More information

ARTICLE I ARTICLE II ARTICLE III ARTICLE V

ARTICLE I ARTICLE II ARTICLE III ARTICLE V Health Savings Custodial Account (Under section 223(a) of the Internal Revenue Code) Form 5305-C (Rev. December 2011) Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service. Do not file with the Internal

More information

HEALTH SAVINGS CUSTODIAL ACCOUNT AGREEMENT

HEALTH SAVINGS CUSTODIAL ACCOUNT AGREEMENT HEALTH SAVINGS CUSTODIAL ACCOUNT AGREEMENT Form 5305-C under section 223(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. FORM (December 2011) The account owner named on the application is establishing this health savings

More information

and before Jan. 1, 2014, and (2) Reg (e)(2)(ii)(d)(2) ( G ), if the property for which the taxpayer is otherwise changing 42

and before Jan. 1, 2014, and (2) Reg (e)(2)(ii)(d)(2) ( G ), if the property for which the taxpayer is otherwise changing 42 https://checkpoint.riag.com/app/view/toolitem?usid=2beac4h462ac&feature=tcheckpoint&lastcpreqid=6... Page 1 of 10 Checkpoint Contents Federal Library Federal Editorial Materials Federal Tax Coordinator

More information

Partnership Audit Changes. January 19, 2016

Partnership Audit Changes. January 19, 2016 Partnership Audit Changes January 19, 2016 BIPARTISAN BUDGET BILL OF 2015 Signed into law by President Obama November 2, 2015. Applies to partnership tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. Partnerships

More information

Debtor Owes Self-employment Tax on Earnings from Post-petition Services

Debtor Owes Self-employment Tax on Earnings from Post-petition Services Debtor Owes Self-employment Tax on Earnings from Post-petition Services Sisson, TC Memo 2016-143 The Tax Court has concluded that a Chapter 11 debtor was liable for selfemployment tax on self-employment

More information

Alphabet Soup for Offers In Compromise (OIC)

Alphabet Soup for Offers In Compromise (OIC) HIGH- STAKES TAX DEFENSE & COMPLEX CRIMINAL DEFENSE 1012 Broad Street, 2nd Fl Bloomfield, NJ 07003 Tel (973) 783-7000 Fax (973) 338-3955 www.deblislaw.com 001612007 Alphabet Soup for Offers In Compromise

More information

Bankruptcy & Workouts Committee G Reorganizations

Bankruptcy & Workouts Committee G Reorganizations Bankruptcy & Workouts Committee G Reorganizations January 21, 2011 Elliot Freier Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA Lisa Fuller Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D.C. Matt Gareau Deloitte Tax LLP,

More information

MERRILL LYNCH PROTOTYPE DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN AND TRUST

MERRILL LYNCH PROTOTYPE DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN AND TRUST MERRILL LYNCH PROTOTYPE DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN AND TRUST Base Plan Document #03 used in conjunction with: Non-Standardized Profit Sharing Plan Adoption Agreement #002 Letter Serial Number: M380270a

More information

Intermediate Sanctions (IRC 4958) Update. By Lawrence M. Brauer and Leonard J. Henzke

Intermediate Sanctions (IRC 4958) Update. By Lawrence M. Brauer and Leonard J. Henzke Intermediate Sanctions (IRC 4958) Update By Lawrence M. Brauer and Leonard J. Henzke Intermediate Sanctions (IRC 4958) Update By Lawrence M. Brauer and Leonard J. Henzke Overview Purpose This article

More information

August 1, Via Federal erulemaking Portal. Internal Revenue Service CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG )

August 1, Via Federal erulemaking Portal. Internal Revenue Service CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG ) Page: 1 of 15 August 1, 2017 Via Federal erulemaking Portal Internal Revenue Service CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-136118-15) Courier s Desk Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C.

More information

Explanation of Provision

Explanation of Provision Explanation of Provision The provision revises section 6051 to require employers to include an identifying number for each employee, rather than an employee s SSN, on Form W-2. This change will permit

More information

Tax Executives Institute Detroit Chapter Meeting

Tax Executives Institute Detroit Chapter Meeting Tax Executives Institute Detroit Chapter Meeting David Blair dblair@crowell.com 202. 624.2765 Jennifer Ray jray@crowell.com 202. 624.2589 February 16, 2017 Navigating LB&I s New Issue Focused Audit Process

More information

ACCOUNTAX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, INCORPORATED A Profile in Continuing Professional Education. Representing Clients During the Collections Process

ACCOUNTAX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, INCORPORATED A Profile in Continuing Professional Education. Representing Clients During the Collections Process ACCOUNTAX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, INCORPORATED A Profile in Continuing Professional Education Representing Clients During the Collections Process A. Extension of time to pay (e.g., Form 1127-A) If a taxpayer

More information

SEC. 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

SEC. 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure 26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. Rev. Proc. 96 13 OUTLINE SECTION 1. PURPOSE OF MUTUAL AGREEMENT PROCESS SEC. 2. SCOPE Suspension.02 Requests for Assistance.03 U.S. Competent Authority.04

More information