2018 Tax Executives Institute, Inc. Houston Texas May 11, 2018 ALL STATES UPDATE. Marilyn M. Wethekam (312)
|
|
- Jemima Sharp
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2018 Tax Executives Institute, Inc. Houston Texas May 11, 2018 ALL STATES UPDATE Marilyn M. Wethekam (312) Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered 500 W. Madison Street, Suite 3700 Chicago, Illinois Tax Executives Institute, Inc.
2 Agenda What is the current state of nexus? Federal Tax Reform The Dividend Fallout Water s Edge and Other Combination Issues Addback Statutes Apportionment and Sourcing Issues 2
3 State of the State of the Saga of Nexus 3
4 South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. South Dakota SB 106 Eff. 5/1/ transactions or sales over $100k; it will not be applied retroactively. South Dakota Supreme Court held in favor of Wayfair, Inc. Argued April 17, 2018 at the U.S. Supreme Court, South Dakota, argued the Court should overturn and/or distinguish the 1992 decision of Quill Corp. v. North Dakota. Supreme Court s concerns: Retroactivity Cost of compliance Legislating from the bench concerns Will Congress act 4
5 Federal Tax Reform Dividends? 5
6 Dividends - What is discriminatory treatment? In the Matter of the Protest of General Electric Company & Subsidiaries, N.M. Admn. Hearings Office, D&0 No , April 6, The Hearing Officer denied General Electric's protest of corporate income tax assessment, finding that the denial of General Electric s deduction of dividends received from foreign subsidiaries did not violate the Foreign Commerce Clause. General Electric elected to be a consolidated group for New Mexico reporting purposes and had 419 foreign subsidiaries from which it received dividends. The Hearing Office found the taxation of the foreign dividends while excluding domestic dividends was not discriminatory because the consolidated group encompasses the total domestic income of the consolidated group including the income that was distributed in the form of dividends. Thus, the total domestic income is subject to tax just as the foreign dividend and Subpart F income is subject to tax. The penalties were abated. 6
7 Dividends What is discriminatory treatment? In the Matter of Costco Wholesale Corporation, Alaska Office of Admin. Hearings, No Tax, June 12, At issue was the deduction of dividends received from an affiliated domestic corporation that was not included in Costco s Alaska water s-edge combined return because it has 80% or more of its property and payroll outside the U.S. The statute provides for 100% deduction of dividends received from members of the unity group. The deduction is limited to 80% for dividends received from foreign affiliates excluded from the group.the statute does not address the treatment of dividends received from a domestic company that does not meet the 80% test. The ALJ concluded based on a review of legislative history that the 80% exclusion was to reflect the expense incurred by a domestic multinational parent to support the income producing activities of the foreign affiliate. In addition, there was no indication from the legislation that a domestic corporation that only had foreign income would be treated differently than a foreign corporation. Thus, there is equal treatment among domestic and foreign corporations not included in a combined return. 7
8 Water s-edge and Other Combination Issues 8
9 Water s-edge and other combination Issues Target Brand Inc. v. Department of Revenue (Denver Dist. Ct. No. 2015CVV33831, Jan. 27, 2017) The Colorado District Court recognized that a subsidiary of Target met the definition of an 80/20 company and thus, could not be included in the Target group but was liable for corporate income tax on a separate return basis. The taxation of the company was permissible because the company had substantial nexus through its instate-licensing activities despite the lack of an instate physical presence. The court rejected the alternative single sales factor apportionment method relied on the sales factor of its parent, Target concluding the Department s approach was neither reasonable nor equitable since it gave no consideration to Target Brand s activities that helped Target s sales in Colorado, and any alternative formula employed by the state must include Target Brand s payroll and property. 9
10 Water s-edge and other combination issues Oracle v. Dept. of Rev. (CO. Ct. of App. No. 16CA 1316, Nov. 30, 2017) The Appellate Court affirmed the District Court holding that Oracle was not required to include a domestic holding company that held the stock of a Japanese affiliate in its combined return as it qualified as an excluded 80/20 company and further could not tax the company on a separate basis. The Department s own regulation provides that a company that has no property or payroll cannot have more than 20% of its factors in the United States. Further, unlike the lower court the Appellate Court did not find the statute to the ambiguous. The court rejecting the Department s economic substance argument further concluded the Department did not have the authority to allocate the holding company s income among the members of the combined group. The company was formed pursuant to the terms of a note secured by Oracle from Nippon Steel and there is no evidence of abuse to support the transfer of income but rather the company was formed for a reasonable business purpose. 10
11 Water s-edge and other combination issues Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev. (CO App. Ct. No. 16CA0849, November 2, 2017) The Appellate Court held that a holding company that held the interest in 4 foreign entities which for federal tax purposes were characterized as flow through entities could not be included in the combined group. The court concluded the federal check the box rules cannot be used to validate the 80/20 rules because the federal rationale for the check the box rules is different than the rationale for the 80/20 rules. However, because the company had not property or payroll under the Colorado regulations it cannot have more than 20% of its factors assigned to the United States. 11
12 Addback Statutes 12
13 Addback Statutes Kohl s Department Stores, Inc. v. Virginia Department of Revenue (VA S.Ct No , March 22, 2018) In a 4-3 decision, the Virginia Supreme Court affirmed the Circuit Court s holding that only the portion of the royalties that are actually taxed by another state falls within the subject to tax exception. The Court acknowledged that the plain language of the statute is ambiguous looked to the legislative intent of the subject to tax exception. To prevent a conflict with the statute s purpose and intent, the Court held that the exception applies only to the extent the royalty payments were actually taxed by another state. 13
14 Addback Statutes The Court, upheld Kohl s alternative argument and held that the Department incorrectly calculated the amount of royalties that qualified for the subject to tax exception. The court rejected the Department s argument that the addback statute applies only to intangible expenses for the related member and one should look only to Kohl s Illinois s, and not Kohl s, tax returns. The court concluded the statute contained no such requirement. Thus, to the extent the royalties were actually taxed by separate return states or combined return states, they should qualify for the subject to tax exception. Note: Three justices dissented finding that the statute is not ambiguous and favored the taxpayer s application of the statute. The three justices resolved any ambiguity in the addback statute in favor of the taxpayer as they determined that the statute constituted an imposition statute. The dissenting justices found that a subsequent law change enacted by the Virginia legislature was evidence that the addback statute should be applied in a manner consistent with the taxpayer s proposed application 14
15 Addback Statutes Infosy s Limited of India Inc. v. Dir. Div. Of Taxation, NJ Tax Ct. Dkt. No , March 19, The New Jersey Tax Court held that Infosys net income for New Jersey purposes was equal to federal taxable income as shown on the federal return. The Tax Court rejected the Director s argument that even though line 29 of the Federal Form 1120 established the tax base there was authority to addback to taxable income any deduction or exemption allowed under foreign tax treaties. The basis for the argument was statutory language which allows the addback of specific exemption or credit allowed in any law of the United States. It was the Director s position that a treaty is the law of the United States and therefore the addback provision applies. The Tax Court found that a treaty is not a law of the United States but rather by definition an agreement between foreign governments. Treaties are governed by international law. The Tax Court held neither a treaty protection nor the Internal Revenue Code limitation on the scope of the taxation of foreign entities qualifies as a specific exemption or credit that is required to be added back to taxable income under New Jersey law. 15
16 Addback Statutes BMC Software, Inc. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 30 N.J.Tax 92 (N.J. Tax Court May 24, 2017) The New Jersey Tax Court found that a subsidiary s intangible expenses paid to its parent qualified for the state s unreasonable addback exception because the payments were substantively equivalent to an unrelated party transaction. The court held that: The unreasonable exception does not require showing that the relatedparty recipient paid Corporation Business Tax on the income. Showing that the related-party transaction was substantively equivalent to an unrelated third party transaction is sufficient evidence for the addback is unreasonable.
17 Apportionment and Sourcing Issues 17
18 Apportionment and Sourcing Issues The University of Phoenix v. IN Dept. of Revenue, IN Tax Ct. No. 49T TA November 30, 2017). The Tax Court addressed the issue of sourcing the University s online campus revenue. The question was should that revenue be sourced to Indiana based on the student s Indiana address or the location of its teachers. The Tax Court concluded the Department erroneously sourced the University s income based on the location of its market rather than using the cost of performance method set forth in the statute. In reaching its conclusion, the Tax Court applied the statutory cost of performance method and sourced the receipts to the location of the income producing activities. The court rejected the Department s argument that the only income producing activity was the opportunity to attend an online class which occurred in Indiana. Effectively, the court rejected the notion that income producing activity should be viewed from the student s prospective. 18
19 Apportionment and Sourcing Issues Honnigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn v. Detroit, MI Ct. Of App. No January 18, The Appellate Court held that for purposes of sourcing the income from legal services one must look to where the service is delivered not where the service is performed. In determining the firm s income sourced to Detroit a three factor formula consisting of property, payroll and sales is used. The sales factor is gross revenue derived from sales made and services rendered in Detroit. The issue relates to whether services rendered is where the clients receive the service or where the work is performed. The court analyzed the statutory language and concluded the term service rendered to mean where the service was received. If the services were received in Detroit the receipts were properly sourced to Detroit. In other words the sales factor adopts a destination approach for sourcing sales of services. 19
20 Apportionment and Sourcing Issues Rent-A-Center West Inc. v. S.C. Dep t of Revenue, No (S.C. Ct. App 2016) Question Presented: Does the statutory apportionment formula fairly represent the taxpayer s business activities in the state; and if not, was the state s alternative method reasonable? The South Carolina Court of Appeals held that the Department of Revenue did not meet its Carmax burden in proving the threshold issue of whether the statutory formula fairly represented the taxpayer s business activities in the state The court did not address (and did not have to address) whether the alternative method was reasonable or any constitutional violations by the Department s application of separate accounting to a unitary business 20
21 Apportionment and Sourcing Issues Corporate Executive Board v. Dep t of Taxation, No. CL (Va. Cir. Ct Sept. 1, 2017) The Virginia Circuit Court upheld the Department s use of the statutory COP method to apportion income from the sales of subscription-based services based on finding that COP method did not lead to inequitable results and was not unconstitutional. The court found that under the COP method, most of CEB s sales originated in Virginia and were attributable to the state. Taxpayer s request for alternative apportionment using market-based sourcing was characterized as arbitrary and CEB failed to show the statutory method lead to a grossly distorted result.
22 Questions? Thank you! m Marilyn M. Wethekam (312) mwethekam@saltlawyers.com Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered 500 W. Madison Street, Suite 3700 Chicago, Illinois Tax Executives Institute, Inc.
Slicing the Pie Update on State Tax Apportionment Litigation TEI Denver
Slicing the Pie Update on State Tax Apportionment Litigation TEI Denver May 15, 2017 Maria Todorova Partner Ted Friedman Associate 2018 (US) LLP Agenda Introduction Key Issues Recent Developments Sales
More informationState Income Tax Litigation You Need to Know About
Michele Borens, Partner Amy Nogid, Counsel TEI New York State and Local Tax Seminar November 9, 2016 State Income Tax Litigation You Need to Know About All Rights Reserved. This communication is for general
More informationJUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE INCOME AND SALES TAX WORLD: THE YEAR IN REVIEW
JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE INCOME AND SALES TAX WORLD: THE YEAR IN REVIEW 2017 Federation of Tax Administrators Annual Meeting Seattle, Washington 6/12/17 Presenters (the opinions expressed are personal
More informationThe Collision of Formulary Apportionment and Transfer Pricing COST Pacific Northwest Regional State Tax Seminar
The Collision of Formulary Apportionment and Transfer Pricing COST Pacific Northwest Regional State Tax Seminar December 7, 2017 Todd Lard Partner Ted Friedman Associate 2017 (US) LLP All Rights Reserved.
More informationTop Ten Nonconformity Issues Between Federal and State
Top Ten Nonconformity Issues Between Federal and State Sixth Annual UW-TEI Tax Forum February 17, 2017 Jeff Friedman, Partner Michele Borens, Partner 2017 (US) LLP All Rights Reserved. This communication
More informationThe Most Important State And Local Tax Cases Of 2017
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com The Most Important State And Local Tax Cases
More informationAlternative Apportionment - The Process and the Impact
Alternative Apportionment - The Process and the Impact Current Issues in State & Local Taxation TEI Philadelphia Chapter February 22, 2017 Maria Todorova Open Weaver Banks 2017 (US) LLP All Rights Reserved.
More informationHold the Intercompany Transactions State and Local Tax Considerations
Hold the Intercompany Transactions State and Local Tax Considerations Current Issues in State & Local Taxation TEI Philadelphia Chapter February 22, 2017 Open Weaver Banks Andrew Appleby 2017 (US) LLP
More informationShifting Apportionment Landscape TEI Nevada Chapter
Shifting Apportionment Landscape TEI Nevada Chapter April 19, 2017 Jeff Friedman Partner Marc Simonetti Partner 2017 (US) LLP All Rights Reserved. This communication is for general informational purposes
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Virginia Supreme Court Affirms Related-Party Addback Safe Harbor Exception Applies on Post-Apportioned Basis In
More informationState and Local Tax Update. Tuesday, November 28, 2017 Wichita Country Club Tim Hartley - Director
State and Local Tax Update Tuesday, November 28, 2017 Wichita Country Club Tim Hartley - Director Presenters Tim Hartley Director Tax tim.hartley@us.gt.com 316 636 6507 Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
More informationSTATE FEDERAL CONFORMITY ISSUES
Tax Executives Institute Houston Texas February 21, 2017 STATE FEDERAL CONFORMITY ISSUES Jordan M. Goodman, Partner Marilyn A. Wethekam, Partner Horwood Marcus & Berk, Chicago IL 1 Agenda Policy Considerations
More informationJeff Friedman, Partner Michele Borens, Partner TEI Richmond Chapter March 19, 2014
Jeff Friedman, Partner Michele Borens, Partner TEI Richmond Chapter March 19, 2014 State Tax Controversy Update Agenda MTC Compact Election Filing Methodologies Insurance Companies 2 MTC Compact Litigation
More informationState Tax Return. Kristi L. Stathopoulos Atlanta (404)
July 2006 Volume 13 Number 7 State Tax Return California Appellate Court Finds Return of Principal on Short- Term Investments Is Gross Receipts, But Excludes From the Taxpayer s Sales Factor Kristi L.
More informationCorporation Could Exclude Sale of U.S. Business from Sales Factor
```` December 2017 California Corporation Could Exclude Sale of U.S. Business from Sales Factor A corporation could exclude the sale of its U.S. business when determining the sales apportionment factor
More informationWayfair The Impact on Manufacturers November 7, 2018
Wayfair The Impact on Manufacturers November 7, 2018 1 Welcome Georgia Association of Manufacturers! 2 Presenters Peter Giroux, SALT Partner Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP Atlanta peter.giroux@dhg.com 404.575.8924
More informationTWIST-Q Summary of Developments First Quarter 2018
TWIST-Q Summary of Developments First Quarter 2018 This checklist includes developments for Quarter 1 of 2018 that have occurred prior to the date of publication. Please note that certain Quarter 1 items
More informationNo. 59 July 16, IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION
No. 59 July 16, 2012 537 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP. and Subsidiaries, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant. (TC 4956) Plaintiff (taxpayer) appealed Defendant
More informationIndustry Specific Nexus Issues
Jeffrey A. Friedman Maria M. Todorova STARTUP Spring 2014 Conference May 15, 2014 Industry Specific Nexus Issues Agenda Jurisdiction to Tax Recent Nexus Developments Industry-Specific Issues Characterization
More informationColorado Out of State Retailers Must Begin Collecting Sales Tax Soon
September 2018 Colorado Out of State Retailers Must Begin Collecting Sales Tax Soon Out of state retailers must collect sales tax if they meet Colorado s economic nexus requirements. Collection requirements
More informationState Tax Return. Geoffrey Bagged In Oklahoma: Tax Commission Sets Its Scopes on Geoffrey's Income From Intangible Property And Hit The Target
February 2006 Volume 13 Number 2 State Tax Return Geoffrey Bagged In Oklahoma: Tax Commission Sets Its Scopes on Geoffrey's Income From Intangible Property And Hit The Target Matthew J. Cristy Atlanta
More informationState Tax Developments,
State Tax Developments, 2015 2016 Annual Conference of State Tax Judges Portland, Oregon September 10, 2016 Presentation by Richard D. Pomp Alva P. Loiselle Professor of Law University of Connecticut School
More informationThe Latest and Greatest in State Tax Litigation
Marc Simonetti Andrew Appleby TEI Upstate New York Tax Conference May 6, 2014 The Latest and Greatest in State Tax Litigation Agenda Group Composition / Unitary Disputes Apportionment Nexus MTC Election
More informationThe Aftermath of Wayfair: What s Next?
The Aftermath of Wayfair: What s Next? Giles Sutton and Tommy Varnell August 1, 2018 Webinar 1 Agenda Nexus Background Examining the Wayfair Holding Anticipating the Impact of Wayfair on Private Equity
More informationECONOMIC NEXUS THROUGH OWNERSHIP AND USE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
ECONOMIC NEXUS THROUGH OWNERSHIP AND USE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Author Alvan L. Bobrow Tags Intangible Assets Intellectual Property Nexus State and Local Tax INTRODUCTION The key issue in determining
More informationState Tax Controversy Update
Marc Simonetti, Partner Sutherland s Year-End Tax Seminar December 6, 2016 State Tax Controversy Update All Rights Reserved. This communication is for general informational purposes only and is not intended
More informationState Tax Return. Alabama s Addback Of Intangible Expense Held Unreasonable
February 2007 Volume 14 Number 2 State Tax Return Alabama s Addback Of Intangible Expense Held Unreasonable Kristi L. Stathopoulos Atlanta (404) 581-8512 E. Kendrick Smith Atlanta (404) 581-8343 On January
More informationTWIST-Q Summary of developments First Quarter 2019
TWIST-Q Summary of developments First Quarter 2019 This checklist includes developments for Quarter 1 of 2019 that have occurred prior to the date of publication. Please note that certain Quarter 1 items
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP New Jersey Tax Court Finds Payments Made by Subsidiary Qualify for Exception to Addback Rule On May 24, 2017, the
More informationState Tax Return. Sooner Rather Than Later: Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Upholds Distinct Withholding Requirements For Nonresident Royalty Owners
September 2007 Volume 14 Number 9 State Tax Return Sooner Rather Than Later: Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Upholds Distinct Withholding Requirements For Nonresident Royalty Owners Laura A. Kulwicki Columbus
More informationConformity Issues in SALT
Carley Roberts, Partner Zachary Atkins, Associate TEI Nashville 2014 Spring Seminar Franklin, TN May 14, 2014 Conformity Issues in SALT Agenda Conformity and the State Income Tax Base Capital Gains Conformity
More informationNexus Assistant Results
Nexus Assistant Results Tax Type: Corporate Income Legend: N/A - Not Applicable Alabama --Company Business income includes income from intangible personal property, the acquisition, management, and disposition
More informationPrivate Letter Ruling No. PLR , Colorado Department of Revenue, October 3, 2017, released December 2017
January 2018 Colorado Presence of Employee In-State Created Nexus The Colorado Department of Revenue has issued a private letter ruling stating that the presence of a taxpayer s employee in Colorado established
More informationNexus Under Fire: The Assault on Quill and Other Developments TEI Los Angeles Chapter
Nexus Under Fire: The Assault on Quill and Other Developments TEI Los Angeles Chapter May 19, 2017 Michele Borens Partner Tim Gustafson Counsel 2017 (US) LLP All Rights Reserved. This communication is
More informationState Tax Implications of Commodities Transactions
Scott Wright Andrew Appleby State Tax Implications of Commodities Transactions Sutherland SALT Financial Services Roundtable January 21, 2016 All Rights Reserved. This communication is for general informational
More informationTWIST-Q Summary of developments
TWIST-Q Summary of developments Rate changes Impact The corporate income tax rate is increased to 7.0 percent effective July 1, 2017. Senate Bill 9 (veto overridden July 6, 2017). IL Because the state
More informationState Tax Return. A Federal Treaty and Approximately $2.00 Will Get You A Ride on the New York Subway
April 2008 State Tax Return Volume 15 Number 2 Peter Leonardis New York (212) 326-3770 A Federal Treaty and Approximately $2.00 Will Get You A Ride on the New York Subway Tax directors of corporations
More informationUDITPA Section 18: The Changing Faces of Alternative Apportionment
UDITPA Section 18: The Changing Faces of Alternative Apportionment July 12, 2009 Presented by: Kelly W. Smith, LLP Jay Koren, LLP PwC This document was not written to be used, and it cannot be used, for
More informationState income and franchise tax
First quarter 2018 State income and franchise tax developments State income and franchise tax Quarterly update To our readers The following provides a summary of the significant legislative, administrative
More informationDear Director Maduros:
NetChoice Promoting Convenience, Choice, and Commerce on The Net Steve DelBianco, President 1401 K St NW, Suite 502 Washington, DC 20005 202-420-7482 www.netchoice.org October 23, 2018 Nicolas Maduros,
More informationSTATE TAX LITIGATION UPDATE
Federation of Tax Administrators Annual Meeting June 10, 2013 STATE TAX LITIGATION UPDATE I. NEXUS ISSUES 1. Ann Sacks Tile and Stone, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, Oregon Tax Court, No. TC 4879, November
More informationTexas Margin Tax Update
Texas Margin Tax Update August 4-5, 2016 Fort Worth Chapter Tax Institute 2016 5 August 2016 Your presenter Donna Rutter Executive Director, Indirect Tax Services Income/ Franchise Tax +1 817 348 6103
More informationSTATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue Office of the Director (602)
CERTIFIED MAIL STATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue Office of the Director (602) 542-3572 The Director's Review of the Decision ) O R D E R of the Hearing Officer Regarding: ) ) [TAXPAYER] ) and SUBSIDIARIES
More informationNationwide State Tax Case Developments
Carley Roberts, Partner Dan Schlueter, Partner Marc Simonetti, Partner TEI Detroit Dearborn, Michigan March 26, 2014 Nationwide State Tax Case Developments MULTISTATE TAX COMPACT LITIGATION 2 The Multistate
More information2016 Colorado Case Law Update
FEATURED ARTICLES 2016 Colorado Case Law Update Tyler Murray, Esq. 1 The following contains a summary of the most significant tax cases decided by Colorado courts during 2016 organized by subject. I. Sales
More informationState Tax Return I. SUBSTANTIAL NEXUS LITIGATION IN THE STATE COURTS
September 2007 Volume 14 Number 9 State Tax Return NEXUS: UPDATE ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Maryann B. Gall Columbus (614) 469-3924 Laura A. Kulwicki Columbus (330) 656-0416 We keep track of nexus developments
More informationIncome/Franchise: Idaho State Tax Commission Discusses How Recently Enacted Federal Tax Reforms May Affect State Income Taxation
State Tax Matters The power of knowing. In this issue: Income/Franchise: Idaho State Tax Commission Discusses How Recently Enacted Federal Tax Reforms May Affect State Income Taxation... 1 Income/Franchise:
More informationAdvanced Income Tax Apportionment Issues Confronting Multi-State Companies
FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY Advanced Income Tax Apportionment Issues Confronting Multi-State Companies THURSDAY, JULY 20, 2017, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE LIVE PROGRAM This program is
More informationLitigation and Controversy Update
Jeff Friedman, Partner Michele Borens, Partner TEI San Diego State and Local Tax Seminar September 29, 2016 Litigation and Controversy Update All Rights Reserved. This communication is for general informational
More informationMarket-Based Sourcing for Revenue From Services and Intangibles: Multistate Apportionment Challenges
FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY Market-Based Sourcing for Revenue From Services and Intangibles: Multistate Apportionment Challenges THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2017, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE
More informationCOUNSEL JUDGES. Walters, Judge, wrote the opinion. WE CONCUR: Andrews, J., Lewis R. Sutin, J. (Specially Concurring) AUTHOR: WALTERS OPINION
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS V. TAXATION & REVENUE DEP'T, 1979-NMCA-092, 93 N.M. 389, 600 P.2d 841 (Ct. App. 1979) AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT of the State
More informationState and Local Income Tax Litigation Cases Not to Miss TEI Dallas SALT Day Program
State and Local Income Tax Litigation Cases Not to Miss TEI Dallas SALT Day Program October 17, 2017 Carley A. Roberts Partner Liz S. Cha Associate 2017 (US) LLP All Rights Reserved. This communication
More informationSingle Sales Apportionment:
Presenting a live 110 minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Single Sales Apportionment: Crafting a Multi State Strategy Meeting Tax Compliance and Planning Demands Amid Significant Changes in Sales
More informationIRC 965, BEAT, GILTI and FDII Through the Lens of a SALT Professional + Recent Developments
IRC 965, BEAT, GILTI and FDII Through the Lens of a SALT Professional + Recent Developments June 21, 2018 Korwin Roskos (Moderator) Senior Tax Manager-State & Local Tax, Amazon Vice Chair of TEI s SALT
More informationState Tax Return. Maryann B. Gall Laura A. Kulwicki Chen Meng Lam Columbus Columbus Columbus Law Clerk (614) (330) (614)
September 2006 Volume 13 Number 9 State Tax Return NEXUS: Update On Recent Developments Maryann B. Gall Laura A. Kulwicki Chen Meng Lam Columbus Columbus Columbus Law Clerk (614) 469-3924 (330) 656-0416
More informationState Tax Return. Illinois Court Rules Reliance On Outside Accountant Does Not Necessarily Abate Penalty
February 2006 Volume 13 Number 2 State Tax Return Illinois Court Rules Reliance On Outside Accountant Does Not Necessarily Abate Penalty Stephen G. Harris Dallas (214) 969-5277 If you cannot rely on your
More informationOhio Tax. Workshop N. Advanced: Multistate Apportionment Sales Factor, Costs of Performance, Market-Based Sourcing & Alternative Apportionment
27th Annual Tuesday & Wednesday, January 23 24, 2018 Hya Regency Columbus, Columbus, Ohio Ohio Tax Workshop N Advanced: Multistate Apportionment Sales Factor, Costs of Performance, Market-Based Sourcing
More informationAdd-Back Statutes: Where Do We Go From Here?
2005 SEATA Conference July 12, 2005 Add-Back Statutes: Where Do We Go From Here? Presented By: Joe Garrett, Esq. Alabama Department of Revenue & Kelly W. Smith, CPA, Esq. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 0 Related
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY Mala Sundar R.J. Hughes Justice Complex JUDGE P.O. Box 975 25 Market Street Trenton, New Jersey 08625
More informationApportionment Rules Evolve As Business Environment Changes
Apportionment Rules Evolve As Business Environment Changes September 2007 By Michael S. Schadewald Michael S. Schadewald examines apportionment rules with a focus on the sales factor. Introduction The
More information2016 Tax Return Due Dates, Expiring Credits, and Other Changes Summarized
January 2017 Illinois 2016 Tax Return Due Dates, Expiring Credits, and Other Changes Summarized The Illinois Department of Revenue (DOR) has issued a bulletin summarizing Illinois income tax return changes
More informationTHE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court. Carmax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc., Respondent/Petitioner,
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Carmax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc., Respondent/Petitioner, v. South Carolina Department of Revenue, Petitioner/Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2012-212203
More informationADMINISTRATIVE DECISION
STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF REFUND CLAIM DISALLOWANCES (ACCT. NO.: ) (Corporate Income Tax) DOCKET NOS.:
More informationPresenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Advanced Apportionment Issues Confronting Multi-State Companies Reporting Accurately and Strategically, Preparing for Problematic States,
More informationState Tax Return. Columbus
April 2007 Volume 14 Number 4 State Tax Return NEXUS: UPDATE ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Maryann B. Gall Columbus (614) 281-3924 Phyllis J. Shambaugh Columbus (614) 281-3824 Laura A. Kulwicki Columbus (330)
More informationALTERNATIVE APPORTIONMENT JULY 2, 2014 IPT ANNUAL CONFERENCE. Peter L. Faber Telephone: (212)
ALTERNATIVE IPT ANNUAL CONFERENCE Peter L. Faber Telephone: (212) 547-5585 pfaber@mwe.com APPORTIONMENT JULY 2, 2014 Most states have some sort of discretionary authority to require a taxpayer to use an
More informationTransfer Pricing Implications for State & Local Tax
Transfer Pricing Implications for State & Local Tax G I A N LU CA P I T ET T I K P M G K E I T H R O B I NSON, P H D P WC I N S T I T U T E F O R P R O F E S S I O N A L S I N TA X AT I O N 2 0 1 6 I N
More informationDebate Over Nexus for Sales/Use Taxes Are We Headed Towards a New Frontier?
Debate Over Nexus for Sales/Use Taxes Are We Headed Towards a New Frontier? Samantha K. Breslow Direct: 312-606-3206 Email: sbreslow@saltlawyers.com Justin B. Stone Direct: 312-606-3247 Email: jstone@saltlawyers.com
More informationThe 2018 National Multistate Tax Symposium Take the lead Tax reform and fortifying state positions. February 7-9, 2018
The 2018 National Multistate Tax Symposium Take the lead Tax reform and fortifying state positions February 7-9, 2018 State tax twists and turns: What s happened that surprised us Valerie Dickerson, Deloitte
More informationNEXUS: UPDATE ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS FOR THE THIRD QUARTER Charolette Noel Dallas
Volume 18 Number 4 December 2011 NEXUS: UPDATE ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS FOR THE THIRD QUARTER 2011 Charolette Noel Dallas 1.214.969.4538 cfnoel@jonesday.com Karen H. Currie Dallas 1.214.969.5285 kcurrie@jonesday.com
More informationØ Sales Tax alone accounts for 34% of state revenue. Average of the 50 State Revenue Sources. Ø Online commerce continues to grow.
Ø Sales Tax alone accounts for 34% of state revenue. Average of the 50 State Revenue Sources Ø Online commerce continues to grow. Ø This past Black Friday, for the second consecutive year, more people
More informationTax Alert Canada. US sales and use tax ramifications for Canadian e-commerce vendors following US Supreme Court judgment.
2018 Issue No. 25 9 July 2018 Tax Alert Canada US sales and use tax ramifications for Canadian e-commerce vendors following US Supreme Court judgment EY Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments
More informationPetition for Writ of Certiorari Granted COUNSEL
1 AMERICAN DAIRY QUEEN CORP. V. TAXATION & REVENUE DEP'T, 1979-NMCA-160, 93 N.M. 743, 605 P.2d 251 (Ct. App. 1979) AMERICAN DAIRY QUEEN CORPORATION, Appellant, vs. TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT OF THE
More informationState income and franchise tax quarterly update
Third quarter 2014 State income tax developments State income and franchise tax quarterly update In this issue To our readers: Key developments The following provides a summary of the significant legislative,
More informationState Tax Return (214) (214)
January 2006 Volume 13 Number 2 State Tax Return Sales Of Products Transported Into Indiana By Common Carrier Arranged By Buyer Are Not Indiana Sales For Indiana Corporate Income Tax Apportionment Purposes:
More informationIMPORTANT INFORMATION
Advanced Income Tax Apportionment Issues Confronting Multi-State Companies Navigating States' Shift to Market-Based Sourcing, Utilizing Alternative Apportionment and Weighting Factors WEDNESDAY, JULY 22,
More information42 nd Annual Notre Dame Tax & Estate Planning Institute
42 nd Annual Notre Dame Tax & Estate Planning Institute State Income Taxation of Trusts, the Significance of State Residency for Fiduciary Income Tax Purposes, the State Fiduciary Income Taxation Rules,
More informationTax Executive STATE AND LOCAL TAX THE PROFESSIONAL JOURNAL OF TAX EXECUTIVES INSTITUTE MAY JUNE 2017 UNFAIR APPORTIONMENT: CONSIDER THE ALTERNATIVES
Tax Executive THE PROFESSIONAL JOURNAL OF TAX EXECUTIVES INSTITUTE MAY JUNE 2017 Vol. 69 No. 3 STATE AND LOCAL TAX UNFAIR APPORTIONMENT: CONSIDER THE ALTERNATIVES THE NEXUS CONNECTION: WHAT S NEXT? TEI
More informationState Tax Matters The power of knowing. February 15, In this issue:
State Tax Matters The power of knowing. In this issue: Idaho: New Law Generally Updates State Conformity to Internal Revenue Code, Revises NOL Computation... 2 Idaho: Revised Temporary Administrative Rule
More informationBad Debts: How Contractual Terms and Sales Tax Intersect IPT Annual Conference Charlotte, North Carolina
Bad Debts: How Contractual Terms and Sales Tax Intersect Thomas Zessman Senior Tax Manager U.S. Bank Minneapolis, Minnesota thomas.zessman@usbank.com Kyle Brehm State and Local Tax Director PricewaterhouseCoopers
More informationState Tax Matters The power of knowing. September 21, In this issue:
State Tax Matters The power of knowing. In this issue: Amnesty/Voluntary Disclosure: New Jersey Division of Taxation Reminds that Amnesty Program is Coming Soon, While Offshore Voluntary Compliance Initiative
More informationGeneral Comments on Deduction of Expenses by Mexican Companies and the Case of the Deduction of Pro-Rata Expenses
General Comments on Deduction of Expenses by Mexican Companies and the Case of the Deduction of Pro-Rata Expenses By Fernando Camarena * General Comments on Deduction of Expenses FERNANDO CAMARENA is a
More informationFair Reflection: Defending Against or Applying Alternative Apportionment
COST Pacific Northwest Regional State Tax Seminar San Francisco, California July 10, 2012 Fair Reflection: Defending Against or Applying Alternative Apportionment Kerne H. O. Matsubara, Esq. Michael J.
More informationSales/Use Tax Updates & Developments - Texas & Louisiana - Streamlined Sales Tax - Affiliate Nexus. IPT - San Antonio March 28, 2012
Sales/Use Tax Updates & Developments - Texas & Louisiana - Streamlined Sales Tax - Affiliate Nexus IPT - San Antonio March 28, 2012 Scott Steinbring David Somerville Tracy Watts Overview Updates & Developments
More informationMichael Bannasch
1 2 Michael Bannasch michael.bannasch@rehmann.com 734.302.4137 3 Physical presence nexus requirement Sales tax definitely Other taxes? Not so sure National Bellas Hess Due Process Clause = Commerce Clause
More informationSoutheastern Association of Tax Administrators Conference 68 th Annual Meeting
Southeastern Association of Tax Administrators Conference 68 th Annual Meeting Marketplace Sales Tax Collection / Use Tax Reporting States Move to Capture More Untaxed Remote Sales July 16, 2018 Presented
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF WASHINGTON.... ) Registration No...
Det. No. 16-0026, 37 WTD 201 (October 31, 2018) 201 Cite as Det. No. 16-0026, 37 WTD 201 (2018) BEFORE THE APPEALS DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of the Petition for Correction
More informationUnconstitutional Taxation of Foreign Dividends Continues
Unconstitutional Taxation of Foreign Dividends Continues 5/1/2001 State + Local Tax Client Alert Although the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Kraft General Foods, Inc. v. Iowa Department
More informationKPMG Share Forum. The Wayfair decision: navigating a world without Quill. Los Angeles, CA
KPMG Share Forum The Wayfair decision: navigating a world without Quill Los Angeles, CA [August 23, 2018 Notices The following information is not intended to be written advice concerning one or more Federal
More informationState Tax Return. Opportunity Calling? Texas Court Rules Certain Telephone Access and Operator Charges are Sourced to Texas.
December 2008 State Tax Return Volume 15 Number 5 Opportunity Calling? Texas Court Rules Certain Telephone Access and Operator Charges are Sourced to Texas. Paul Broman David J. Schenck Houston Dallas
More informationE-Commerce, Nexus, and State Policy Trends. LeAnn Luna. 7 th Annual Tax Policy Conference May 20, 2010
E-Commerce, Nexus, and State Policy Trends LeAnn Luna University of Tennessee Prepared for the New Mexico Tax Research Institute epa ed o t e e e co a esea c st tute 7 th Annual Tax Policy Conference May
More informationState & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP New Jersey Tax Court Finds Out-of-State Corporate Limited Partner Has Nexus for CBT Purposes On October 4, 2017,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 8, 2008 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 8, 2008 Session NEWELL WINDOW FURNISHING, INC. v. RUTH E. JOHNSON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Chancery Court
More informationThese slides are at Chapter 6. C Corporations. California and Multistate Developments. California
These slides are at http://mntaxclass.com. C Corporations Chapter 6 California and Multistate Developments California 2 2 What about TCJA conformity? 3 Considerations CA conforms to IRC as of 1/1/15 with
More informationState Tax Matters The power of knowing. September 8, In this issue:
State Tax Matters The power of knowing. In this issue: Amnesty: Virginia: Amnesty Program Begins September 13, 2017 and Ends November 14, 2017 Providing for Potential 50% Interest Waiver and 100% Penalty
More informationCould You Benefit From A Little SALT? (State and Local Tax)
Could You Benefit From A Little SALT? (State and Local Tax) Mike Goral, J.D., LL.M. Partner-in-Charge, State and Local Tax Services Interstate Activity and Nexus Where Do I Have to File? Nexus Nexus is
More informationYEAR-END STATE AND LOCAL TAX PLANNING FOR BUSINESSES
YEAR-END STATE AND LOCAL TAX PLANNING FOR BUSINESSES December 5, 2018 BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (2000) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 30,828
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 1-0 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note
More informationTax Trends Tax Trends 2000 Illinois Tax Update. I n an opinion having twofold significance for pass-through INCOME AND REPLACEMENT TAXES
Tax Trends 2000 Illinois Tax Update Editor-in-Chief: Brian L. Browdy The Horwood Marcus & Berk State and Local Tax Group practices in all areas of state and local taxation. The firm s state and local tax
More information