Supplement to Taming the Factor Zoo

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Supplement to Taming the Factor Zoo"

Transcription

1 Supplement to Taming the Factor Zoo Guanhao Feng Booth School of Business University of Chicago Stefano Giglio Booth School of Business University of Chicago Dacheng Xiu Booth School of Business University of Chicago This Version: April 6, 2017 Abstract This supplemental appendix provides additional tables and references. Address: 5807 S Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. address: guanhao.feng@chicagobooth.edu. Address: 5807 S Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. address: stefano.giglio@chicagobooth.edu. Address: 5807 S Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. address: dacheng.xiu@chicagobooth.edu. 1

2 Table 1: Factor Zoo id Description Description Average S.D. Ann. SR Reference 1 V Excess Market Return 0.63% 4.45% 49.29% Sharpe (1964) 2 T Beta 0.22% 5.69% 13.41% Fama and MacBeth (1973) 3 T Beta squared 0.22% 5.69% 13.61% Fama and MacBeth (1973) 4 V Earnings to price 0.37% 4.64% 27.97% Basu (1977) 5 V Dividend to price 0.11% 3.69% 10.59% Litzenberger and Ramaswamy (1982) 6 M Unexpected quarterly earnings 0.20% 1.64% 41.19% Rendleman et al. (1982) 7 T Change in forecasted EPS 0.34% 1.51% 78.96% Hawkins et al. (1984) 8 V Long-Term Reversal 0.18% 2.52% 24.44% Bondt and Thaler (1985) 9 V Forecasted Growth in 5-year EPS 0.00% 5.11% 0.13% Bauman and Dowen (1988) 10 V Leverage 0.27% 4.00% 23.22% Bhandari (1988) 11 T Bid-ask spread 0.14% 6.31% 7.81% Amihud and Mendelson (1989) 12 IN Cash flow to debt 0.23% 3.33% 24.30% Ou and Penman (1989) 13 IN Current ratio 0.13% 3.08% 14.54% Ou and Penman (1989) 14 IN % change in current ratio -0.01% 1.09% -2.38% Ou and Penman (1989) 15 IN % change in quick ratio 0.01% 1.14% 3.85% Ou and Penman (1989) 16 IN % change sales-to-inventory 0.08% 0.94% 29.12% Ou and Penman (1989) 17 IN Quick ratio 0.11% 3.15% 12.35% Ou and Penman (1989) 18 IN Sales to cash -0.09% 2.80% % Ou and Penman (1989) 19 IN Sales to inventory 0.11% 2.06% 18.91% Ou and Penman (1989) 20 IN Sales to receivables 0.22% 1.70% 44.22% Ou and Penman (1989) 21 M 12-month momentum 0.03% 3.92% 3.08% Jegadeesh (1990) 22 V Depreciation / PP&E 0.34% 3.52% 33.38% Holthausen and Larcker (1992) 23 V % change in depreciation 0.08% 1.19% 23.02% Holthausen and Larcker (1992) 24 T Small Minus Big 0.11% 3.05% 12.73% Fama and French (1993) 25 V High Minus Low 0.28% 2.98% 32.80% Fama and French (1993) 26 T Short-Term Reversal 0.28% 3.36% 29.18% Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) 27 M 1-month momentum 0.27% 2.99% 31.61% Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) 28 M 36-month momentum 0.16% 3.55% 15.79% Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) 29 M 6-month momentum 0.29% 2.87% 35.38% Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) 30 V Sales growth 0.25% 1.73% 49.55% Lakonishok et al. (1994) 31 V Dividend initiation 0.21% 2.53% 28.19% Michaely et al. (1995) 32 V Dividend Omission 0.13% 2.12% 20.74% Michaely et al. (1995) 33 T New equity issue 0.61% 3.20% 65.86% Loughran and Ritter (1995) Note. The factor zoo contains 112 tradable and two non-tradable factors for monthly data from July 1980 to December We only use 105 of them in the empirical analysis because of the missing value issue. In addition to those publicly available factors from the authors, for all other firm characteristics listed, we follow the Fama-French portfolio sorting rule and construct the long-short portfolio spreads (top 30% - bottom 30% or 1-0 dummy difference) based on the security sorting on the previous June. For factor classification, M is Momentum, V is Value-versus-Growth, I is Investment, P is Profitability, IN is Intangibles, and T is Trading Frictions. 2

3 Table 2: Factor Zoo (continued) id Description Description Average S.D. Ann. SR Reference 34 I Working capital accruals 0.29% 1.74% 56.88% Sloan (1996) 35 V Sales to price 0.65% 2.95% 76.46% Barbee Jr et al. (1996) 36 M Momentum 0.63% 4.55% 48.33% Carhart (1997) 37 IN Industry adjusted % change in capital expenditures 0.03% 1.44% 7.95% Abarbanell and Bushee (1998) 38 IN % change in gross margin - % change in sales 0.15% 1.29% 39.02% Abarbanell and Bushee (1998) 39 IN % change in sales - % change in inventory 0.08% 0.92% 28.54% Abarbanell and Bushee (1998) 40 IN % change in sales - % change in A/R 0.11% 0.93% 40.33% Abarbanell and Bushee (1998) 41 IN % change in sales - % change in SG&A 0.02% 1.36% 5.86% Abarbanell and Bushee (1998) 42 T Share turnover 0.49% 4.28% 39.58% Datar et al. (1998) 43 M Industry momentum 0.13% 3.60% 12.56% Moskowitz and Grinblatt (1999) 44 M Number of earnings increases 0.11% 0.86% 44.47% Barth et al. (1999) 45 V Industry-adjusted book to market 0.41% 2.11% 67.11% Asness et al. (2000) 46 V Industry-adjusted cash flow to price ratio 0.31% 1.83% 58.67% Asness et al. (2000) 47 P Industry-adjusted change in employees 0.15% 1.30% 40.82% Asness et al. (2000) 48 T Industry-adjusted size 0.00% 2.27% -0.46% Asness et al. (2000) 49 P Financial statements score 0.21% 1.99% 36.57% Piotroski (2000) 50 T Dollar trading volume 0.37% 3.83% 33.45% Chordia et al. (2001) 51 IN Number of analysts covering stock 0.12% 3.70% 11.42% Elgers et al. (2001) 52 T Scaled earnings forecast 0.70% 4.17% 58.10% Elgers et al. (2001) 53 T Volatility of liquidity (dollar trading volume) 0.34% 2.78% 42.16% Chordia et al. (2001) 54 T Volatility of liquidity (share turnover) 0.29% 3.79% 26.40% Chordia et al. (2001) 55 I Change in inventory 0.20% 1.29% 53.77% Thomas and Zhang (2002) 56 I Change in tax expense 0.02% 1.40% 5.07% Thomas and Zhang (2002) 57 T Dispersion in forecasted EPS 0.18% 3.99% 15.62% Diether et al. (2002) 58 T Illiquidity 0.28% 3.88% 25.33% Amihud (2002) 59 T Liquidity 0.32% 5.80% 18.88% Pástor and Stambaugh (2003) 60 I Growth in long term net operating assets 0.40% 1.57% 89.12% Fairfield et al. (2003) 61 T Idiosyncratic return volatility 0.24% 6.62% 12.35% Ali et al. (2003) 62 V Cash flow to price ratio 0.43% 4.25% 34.76% Desai et al. (2004) 63 I Corporate investment 0.14% 1.09% 43.21% Titman et al. (2004) 64 I R&D increase 0.19% 3.08% 21.17% Eberhart et al. (2004) 65 IN Earnings volatility 0.04% 5.05% 3.08% Francis et al. (2004) 66 V Tax income to book income 0.17% 2.82% 20.45% Lev and Nissim (2004) 67 IN # years since first Compustat coverage 0.29% 2.88% 34.87% Jiang et al. (2005) 68 I Growth in common shareholder equity 0.24% 2.00% 41.05% Richardson et al. (2005) 69 I Growth in long-term debt 0.38% 1.22% % Richardson et al. (2005) 70 P Financial statement score 0.16% 2.04% 26.68% Mohanram (2005) 71 IN Price delay 0.05% 1.69% 11.06% Hou and Moskowitz (2005) 72 M Change in 6-month momentum 0.31% 2.08% 51.76% Gettleman and Marks (2006) 73 I Growth in capital expenditures 0.15% 1.44% 36.03% Anderson and Garcia-Feijoo (2006) 74 IN Industry sales concentration 0.05% 2.20% 8.26% Hou and Kimmel (2006) 75 I R&D to market capitalization 0.75% 4.34% 59.94% Guo et al. (2006) 76 I R&D to sales 0.26% 5.70% 15.78% Guo et al. (2006) 77 T Return volatility 0.22% 5.80% 13.40% Ang et al. (2006) 3

4 Table 3: Factor Zoo (continued) id Description Description Average S.D. Ann. SR Reference 78 T Zero trading days 0.54% 4.03% 46.14% Liu (2006) 79 T Change in #analyst 0.09% 1.28% 23.57% Sadka and Scherbina (2007) 80 P Return on invested capital 0.29% 3.92% 25.40% Brown and Rowe (2007) 81 IN Debt capacity/firm tangibility 0.11% 3.02% 12.53% Almeida and Campello (2007) 82 M Abnormal earnings announcement volume 0.01% 1.26% 2.37% Lerman et al. (2008) 83 I Asset growth 0.46% 1.84% 86.25% Cooper et al. (2008) 84 P Industry-adjusted change in asset turnover 0.11% 0.81% 47.77% Soliman (2008) 85 I Change in shares outstanding 0.41% 2.22% 64.13% Pontiff and Woodgate (2008) 86 P Industry-adjusted change in profit margin 0.01% 1.36% 3.56% Soliman (2008) 87 M Earnings announcement return 0.17% 1.12% 54.06% Brandt et al. (2008) 88 V Cash productivity 0.42% 2.96% 49.73% Chandrashekar and Rao (2009) 89 M Revenue surprise -0.06% 1.75% % Kama (2009) 90 T Sin stocks 0.45% 3.86% 39.94% Hong and Kacperczyk (2009) 91 T Cash flow volatility 0.31% 3.68% 29.20% Huang (2009) 92 IN Absolute accruals 0.04% 2.65% 4.88% Bandyopadhyay et al. (2010) 93 IN Capital expenditures and inventory 0.37% 1.78% 72.19% Chen and Zhang (2010) 94 T Accrual volatility 0.35% 3.65% 32.80% Bandyopadhyay et al. (2010) 95 V Real estate holdings 0.07% 2.73% 9.33% Tuzel (2010) 96 P Return on assets 0.18% 3.86% 15.75% Balakrishnan et al. (2010) 97 IN Percent accruals 0.29% 1.60% 62.97% Hafzalla et al. (2011) 98 T Maximum daily return 0.15% 4.94% 10.28% Bali et al. (2011) 99 IN Cash holdings 0.30% 3.79% 27.71% Palazzo (2012) 100 V Quality Minus Junk 0.49% 2.54% 66.98% Asness et al. (2014) 101 P Gross profitability 0.29% 2.28% 44.14% Novy-Marx (2013) 102 IN Organizational capital 0.51% 3.02% 59.07% Eisfeldt and Papanikolaou (2013) 103 T AEM Leverage Factor Adrian et al. (2014) 104 I Investment 0.38% 1.92% 67.82% Hou et al. (2014) 105 P Profitability 0.59% 2.61% 77.78% Hou et al. (2014) 106 T Betting Against Beta 0.96% 3.62% 91.52% Frazzini and Pedersen (2014) 107 I Employee growth rate 0.24% 1.81% 45.88% Belo et al. (2014) 108 P Robust Minus Weak 0.38% 2.33% 56.02% Fama and French (2015) 109 I Conservative Minus Aggressive 0.30% 2.03% 51.52% Fama and French (2015) 110 T Intermediary Capital Risk He et al. (2016) 111 T Intermediary Investment Return 1.14% 6.77% 58.34% He et al. (2016) 112 IN Convertible Debt Indicator 0.27% 1.45% 63.28% Valta (2016) 113 IN Secured Debt -0.02% 2.87% -1.91% Valta (2016) 114 IN Secured Debt Indicator 0.01% 2.21% 1.51% Valta (2016) 4

5 References of the Appendix Abarbanell, J. S. and Bushee, B. J. (1998). Abnormal returns to a fundamental analysis strategy. Accounting Review, pages Adrian, T., Etula, E., and Muir, T. (2014). Financial intermediaries and the cross-section of asset returns. The Journal of Finance, 69(6): Ali, A., Hwang, L.-S., and Trombley, M. A. (2003). Arbitrage risk and the book-to-market anomaly. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(2): Almeida, H. and Campello, M. (2007). Financial constraints, asset tangibility, and corporate investment. Review of Financial Studies, 20(5): Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of financial markets, 5(1): Amihud, Y. and Mendelson, H. (1989). The effects of beta, bid-ask spread, residual risk, and size on stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 44(2): Anderson, C. W. and Garcia-Feijoo, L. (2006). Empirical evidence on capital investment, growth options, and security returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(1): Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., and Zhang, X. (2006). The cross-section of volatility and expected returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(1): Asness, C. S., Frazzini, A., and Pedersen, L. H. (2014). Quality minus junk. Technical report, AQR Capital Management. Asness, C. S., Porter, R. B., and Stevens, R. L. (2000). Predicting stock returns using industryrelative firm characteristics. Technical report, AQR Capital Investment. Balakrishnan, K., Bartov, E., and Faurel, L. (2010). Post loss/profit announcement drift. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(1): Bali, T. G., Cakici, N., and Whitelaw, R. F. (2011). Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(2): Bandyopadhyay, S. P., Huang, A. G., and Wirjanto, T. S. (2010). The accrual volatility anomaly. Technical report, working paper, University of Waterloo. Barbee Jr, W. C., Mukherji, S., and Raines, G. A. (1996). Do sales-price and debt-equity explain stock returns better than book-market and firm size? Financial Analysts Journal, pages

6 Barth, M. E., Elliott, J. A., and Finn, M. W. (1999). Market rewards associated with patterns of increasing earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2): Basu, S. (1977). Investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price-earnings ratios: A test of the efficient market hypothesis. The Journal of Finance, 32(3): Bauman, W. S. and Dowen, R. (1988). Growth projections and commin stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 44(4):79. Belo, F., Lin, X., and Bazdresch, S. (2014). Labor hiring, investment, and stock return predictability in the cross section. Journal of Political Economy, 122(1): Bhandari, L. C. (1988). Debt/equity ratio and expected common stock returns: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Finance, 43(2): Bondt, W. F. and Thaler, R. (1985). Does the stock market overreact? 40(3): The Journal of Finance, Brandt, M. W., Kishore, R., Santa-Clara, P., and Venkatachalam, M. (2008). Earnings announcements are full of surprises. Technical report, Duke University. Brown, D. P. and Rowe, B. (2007). The productivity premium in equity returns. Technical report, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of finance, 52(1): Chandrashekar, S. and Rao, R. K. (2009). The productivity of corporate cash holdings and the cross-section of expected stock returns. McCombs Research Paper Series No. FIN Chen, L. and Zhang, L. (2010). A better three-factor model that explains more anomalies. Journal of Finance, 65(2): Chordia, T., Subrahmanyam, A., and Anshuman, V. R. (2001). Trading activity and expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 59(1):3 32. Cooper, M. J., Gulen, H., and Schill, M. J. (2008). returns. The Journal of Finance, 63(4): Asset growth and the cross-section of stock Datar, V. T., Naik, N. Y., and Radcliffe, R. (1998). Liquidity and stock returns: An alternative test. Journal of Financial Markets, 1(2): Desai, H., Rajgopal, S., and Venkatachalam, M. (2004). Value-glamour and accruals mispricing: One anomaly or two? The Accounting Review, 79(2):

7 Diether, K. B., Malloy, C. J., and Scherbina, A. (2002). Differences of opinion and the cross section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 57(5): Eberhart, A. C., Maxwell, W. F., and Siddique, A. R. (2004). An examination of long-term abnormal stock returns and operating performance following r&d increases. The Journal of Finance, 59(2): Eisfeldt, A. L. and Papanikolaou, D. (2013). Organization capital and the cross-section of expected returns. The Journal of Finance, 68(4): Elgers, P. T., Lo, M. H., and Pfeiffer Jr, R. J. (2001). Delayed security price adjustments to financial analysts forecasts of annual earnings. The Accounting Review, 76(4): Fairfield, P. M., Whisenant, S., and Yohn, T. L. (2003). The differential persistence of accruals and cash flows for future operating income versus future profitability. Review of Accounting Studies, 8(2-3): Fama, E. F. and French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of financial economics, 33(1):3 56. Fama, E. F. and French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1):1 22. Fama, E. F. and MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3): Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. M., and Schipper, K. (2004). attributes. The accounting review, 79(4): Costs of equity and earnings Frazzini, A. and Pedersen, L. H. (2014). Betting against beta. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1):1 25. Gettleman, E. and Marks, J. M. (2006). Acceleration strategies. Technical report, Bentley University. Guo, R.-J., Lev, B., and Shi, C. (2006). Explaining the short-and long-term ipo anomalies in the us by r&d. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(3-4): Hafzalla, N., Lundholm, R., and Matthew Van Winkle, E. (2011). Percent accruals. The Accounting Review, 86(1): Hawkins, E. H., Chamberlin, S. C., and Daniel, W. E. (1984). Earnings expectations and security prices. Financial Analysts Journal, pages He, Z., Kelly, B., and Manela, A. (2016). Intermediary asset pricing: New evidence from many asset classes. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research. 7

8 Holthausen, R. W. and Larcker, D. F. (1992). The prediction of stock returns using financial statement information. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(2-3): Hong, H. and Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1): Hou, K. and Kimmel, R. (2006). On the estimation of risk premia in linear factor models. Technical report, Working Paper, Ohio State University. Hou, K. and Moskowitz, T. J. (2005). Market frictions, price delay, and the cross-section of expected returns. Review of Financial Studies, 18(3): Hou, K., Xue, C., and Zhang, L. (2014). Digesting anomalies: An investment approach. Review of Financial Studies, pages Huang, A. G. (2009). The cross section of cashflow volatility and expected stock returns. Journal of Empirical Finance, 16(3): Jegadeesh, N. (1990). Evidence of predictable behavior of security returns. The Journal of Finance, 45(3): Jegadeesh, N. and Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of finance, 48(1): Jiang, G., Lee, C. M., and Zhang, Y. (2005). Information uncertainty and expected returns. Review of Accounting Studies, 10(2-3): Kama, I. (2009). On the market reaction to revenue and earnings surprises. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(1-2): Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1994). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. The Journal of Finance, 49(5): Lerman, A., Livnat, J., and Mendenhall, R. R. (2008). The high-volume return premium and postearnings announcement drift. Technical report, Yale University. Lev, B. and Nissim, D. (2004). Taxable income, future earnings, and equity values. The Accounting Review, 79(4): Litzenberger, R. H. and Ramaswamy, K. (1982). The effects of dividends on common stock prices tax effects or information effects? The Journal of Finance, 37(2): Liu, W. (2006). A liquidity-augmented capital asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3):

9 Loughran, T. and Ritter, J. R. (1995). The new issues puzzle. The Journal of finance, 50(1): Michaely, R., Thaler, R. H., and Womack, K. L. (1995). Price reactions to dividend initiations and omissions: Overreaction or drift? The Journal of Finance, 50(2): Mohanram, P. S. (2005). Separating winners from losers among lowbook-to-market stocks using financial statement analysis. Review of Accounting Studies, 10(2-3): Moskowitz, T. J. and Grinblatt, M. (1999). Do industries explain momentum? The Journal of Finance, 54(4): Novy-Marx, R. (2013). The other side of value: The gross profitability premium. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1):1 28. Ou, J. A. and Penman, S. H. (1989). Financial statement analysis and the prediction of stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(4): Palazzo, B. (2012). Cash holdings, risk, and expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(1): Pástor, L. and Stambaugh, R. F. (2003). Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. Journal of Political economy, 111(3): Piotroski, J. D. (2000). Value investing: The use of historical financial statement information to separate winners from losers. Journal of Accounting Research, pages Pontiff, J. and Woodgate, A. (2008). Share issuance and cross-sectional returns. The Journal of Finance, 63(2): Rendleman, R. J., Jones, C. P., and Latane, H. A. (1982). Empirical anomalies based on unexpected earnings and the importance of risk adjustments. Journal of Financial Economics, 10(3): Richardson, S. A., Sloan, R. G., Soliman, M. T., and Tuna, I. (2005). Accrual reliability, earnings persistence and stock prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(3): Sadka, R. and Scherbina, A. (2007). Analyst disagreement, mispricing, and liquidity. The Journal of Finance, 62(5): Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3): Sloan, R. G. (1996). Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? Accounting Review, 71(3):

10 Soliman, M. T. (2008). The use of dupont analysis by market participants. The Accounting Review, 83(3): Thomas, J. K. and Zhang, H. (2002). Inventory changes and future returns. Review of Accounting Studies, 7(2-3): Titman, S., Wei, J., and Xie, F. (2004). Capital investments and stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39(4): Tuzel, S. (2010). Corporate real estate holdings and the cross-section of stock returns. Review of Financial Studies, 23(6): Valta, P. (2016). Strategic default, debt structure, and stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51(01):

Introduction. Contribution

Introduction. Contribution Lecture Notes Hou, Xue, and Zhang (2015, Review of Financial Studies) Digesting Anomalies: An Investment Approach Lu Zhang 1 1 Ohio State and NBER BUSFIN 8250 Autumn 2014, Ohio State Introduction Contribution

More information

Online Appendix. Anomalies across the globe: Once public, no longer existent?

Online Appendix. Anomalies across the globe: Once public, no longer existent? Online Appendix Anomalies across the globe: Once public, no longer existent? Heiko Jacobs and Sebastian Müller October 2018 Abstract Table 1 provides an overview of the 241 anomalies relied on in the paper.

More information

q 5 Stress-testing Factor Models

q 5 Stress-testing Factor Models q 5 Stress-testing Factor Models Kewei Hou 1 Haitao Mo 2 Chen Xue 3 Lu Zhang 1 1 Ohio State 2 LSU 3 University of Cincinnati Bernstein Quantitative Finance Conference October 4, 2018 Introduction Theme

More information

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER. Home work Assignment #4 Due: May 24, 2012

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER. Home work Assignment #4 Due: May 24, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration FIN 532 Advanced Topics in Capital Markets Home work Assignment #4 Due: May 24, 2012 The point of this assignment is

More information

Quantitative Analysis in Finance

Quantitative Analysis in Finance *** This syllabus is tentative and subject to change as needed. Quantitative Analysis in Finance Professor: E-mail: sean.shin@aalto.fi Phone: +358-50-304-3004 Office: G2.10 (Office hours: by appointment)

More information

Replicating Anomalies

Replicating Anomalies Replicating Anomalies Kewei Hou 1 Chen Xue 2 Lu Zhang 3 1 The Ohio State University and CAFR 2 University of Cincinnati 3 The Ohio State University and NBER NBER Long-term Asset Management Conference May

More information

Online Appendix to Turning Alphas into Betas: Arbitrage and Endogenous Risk

Online Appendix to Turning Alphas into Betas: Arbitrage and Endogenous Risk Online Appendix to Turning Alphas into Betas: Arbitrage and Endogenous Risk Thummim Cho Harvard University January 15, 2016 Please click here for the most recent version and online appendix. Abstract The

More information

Variation in Liquidity and Costly Arbitrage

Variation in Liquidity and Costly Arbitrage Variation in Liquidity and Costly Arbitrage Badrinath Kottimukkalur George Washington University Discussed by Fang Qiao PBCSF, TSinghua University EMF, 15 December 2018 Puzzle The level of liquidity affects

More information

Replicating Anomalies

Replicating Anomalies Replicating Anomalies Kewei Hou The Ohio State University and CAFR Chen Xue University of Cincinnati April 2017 Lu Zhang The Ohio State University and NBER Abstract The anomalies literature is infested

More information

Cross Sectional Asset Pricing Tests: Ex Ante versus Ex Post Approaches

Cross Sectional Asset Pricing Tests: Ex Ante versus Ex Post Approaches Cross Sectional Asset Pricing Tests: Ex Ante versus Ex Post Approaches Mahmoud Botshekan Smurfit School of Business, University College Dublin, Ireland mahmoud.botshekan@ucd.ie, +353-1-716-8976 John Cotter

More information

FIN512 Professor Lars A. Lochstoer Page 1

FIN512 Professor Lars A. Lochstoer Page 1 FIN512 Professor Lars A. Lochstoer Page 1 FIN512 Empirical Asset Pricing Autumn 2018 Course Outline and Syllabus Contact Information: Professor Lars A. Lochstoer Email: lars.lochstoer@anderson.ucla.edu

More information

- Breaking Down Anomalies: Comparative Analysis of the Q-factor and Fama-French Five-Factor Model Performance -

- Breaking Down Anomalies: Comparative Analysis of the Q-factor and Fama-French Five-Factor Model Performance - - Breaking Down Anomalies: Comparative Analysis of the Q-factor and Fama-French Five-Factor Model Performance - Preliminary Master Thesis Report Supervisor: Costas Xiouros Hand-in date: 01.03.2017 Campus:

More information

When Low Beats High: Riding the Sales Seasonality Premium

When Low Beats High: Riding the Sales Seasonality Premium When Low Beats High: Riding the Sales Seasonality Premium Gustavo Grullon Rice University grullon@rice.edu Yamil Kaba Rice University yamil.kaba@rice.edu Alexander Núñez Lehman College alexander.nuneztorres@lehman.cuny.edu

More information

Idiosyncratic Risk and Stock Return Anomalies: Cross-section and Time-series Effects

Idiosyncratic Risk and Stock Return Anomalies: Cross-section and Time-series Effects Idiosyncratic Risk and Stock Return Anomalies: Cross-section and Time-series Effects Biljana Nikolic, Feifei Wang, Xuemin (Sterling) Yan, and Lingling Zheng* Abstract This paper examines the cross-section

More information

Lecture Notes. Lu Zhang 1. BUSFIN 920: Theory of Finance The Ohio State University Autumn and NBER. 1 The Ohio State University

Lecture Notes. Lu Zhang 1. BUSFIN 920: Theory of Finance The Ohio State University Autumn and NBER. 1 The Ohio State University Lecture Notes Li and Zhang (2010, J. of Financial Economics): Does Q-Theory with Investment Frictions Explain Anomalies in the Cross-Section of Returns? Lu Zhang 1 1 The Ohio State University and NBER

More information

Replicating Anomalies

Replicating Anomalies Replicating Anomalies Kewei Hou 1 Chen Xue 2 Lu Zhang 3 1 The Ohio State University and CAFR 2 University of Cincinnati 3 The Ohio State University and NBER UNC Hedge Fund Research Symposium December 8,

More information

Variation in Liquidity, Costly Arbitrage, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns

Variation in Liquidity, Costly Arbitrage, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns Variation in Liquidity, Costly Arbitrage, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns Badrinath Kottimukkalur * January 2018 Abstract This paper provides an arbitrage based explanation for the puzzling negative

More information

Systematic liquidity risk and stock price reaction to shocks: Evidence from London Stock Exchange

Systematic liquidity risk and stock price reaction to shocks: Evidence from London Stock Exchange Systematic liquidity risk and stock price reaction to shocks: Evidence from London Stock Exchange Khelifa Mazouz a,*, Dima W.H. Alrabadi a, and Shuxing Yin b a Bradford University School of Management,

More information

Earnings quality and the value premium G. Athanassakos Ivey Business School Western University London, Ontario, Canada

Earnings quality and the value premium G. Athanassakos Ivey Business School Western University London, Ontario, Canada Earnings quality and the value premium G. Athanassakos Ivey Business School Western University London, Ontario, Canada gathanassakos@ivey.uwo.ca V. Athanasakou London School of Economics London, UK v.athanasakou@lse.ac.uk

More information

Discussion of Information Uncertainty and Post-Earnings-Announcement-Drift

Discussion of Information Uncertainty and Post-Earnings-Announcement-Drift Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(3) & (4), 434 438, April/May 2007, 0306-686X doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02031.x Discussion of Information Uncertainty and Post-Earnings-Announcement-Drift

More information

Turnover: Liquidity or Uncertainty?

Turnover: Liquidity or Uncertainty? Turnover: Liquidity or Uncertainty? Alexander Barinov Terry College of Business University of Georgia E-mail: abarinov@terry.uga.edu http://abarinov.myweb.uga.edu/ This version: July 2009 Abstract The

More information

Does market liquidity explain the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle in the Chinese stock market?

Does market liquidity explain the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle in the Chinese stock market? Does market liquidity explain the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle in the Chinese stock market? Xiaoxing Liu Guangping Shi Southeast University, China Bin Shi Acadian-Asset Management Disclosure The views

More information

Scaling up Market Anomalies *

Scaling up Market Anomalies * Scaling up Market Anomalies * By Doron Avramov, Si Cheng, Amnon Schreiber, and Koby Shemer December 29, 2015 Abstract This paper implements momentum among a host of market anomalies. Our investment universe

More information

Asset Pricing Anomalies and Financial Distress

Asset Pricing Anomalies and Financial Distress Asset Pricing Anomalies and Financial Distress Doron Avramov, Tarun Chordia, Gergana Jostova, and Alexander Philipov March 3, 2010 1 / 42 Outline 1 Motivation 2 Data & Methodology Methodology Data Sample

More information

REVISITING THE ASSET PRICING MODELS

REVISITING THE ASSET PRICING MODELS REVISITING THE ASSET PRICING MODELS Mehak Jain 1, Dr. Ravi Singla 2 1 Dept. of Commerce, Punjabi University, Patiala, (India) 2 University School of Applied Management, Punjabi University, Patiala, (India)

More information

Does Earnings Quality predict Net Share Issuance?

Does Earnings Quality predict Net Share Issuance? Does Earnings Quality predict Net Share Issuance? Jagadish Dandu* Eddie Wei Faith Xie ABSTRACT We investigate whether quality of earnings predicts net share issuance by corporations. Pontiff and Woodgate

More information

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY Haas School of Business. PHDBA229A Macro-Accounting/Interdisciplinary Capital Markets Research for PhDs Fall 2015

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY Haas School of Business. PHDBA229A Macro-Accounting/Interdisciplinary Capital Markets Research for PhDs Fall 2015 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY Haas School of Business PHDBA229A Macro-Accounting/Interdisciplinary Capital Markets Research for PhDs Fall 2015 Instructor: Class location: Class time: Instructor

More information

Variation in Liquidity and Costly Arbitrage

Variation in Liquidity and Costly Arbitrage and Costly Arbitrage Badrinath Kottimukkalur * December 2018 Abstract This paper explores the relationship between the variation in liquidity and arbitrage activity. A model shows that arbitrageurs will

More information

Market Efficiency and Idiosyncratic Volatility in Vietnam

Market Efficiency and Idiosyncratic Volatility in Vietnam International Journal of Business and Management; Vol. 10, No. 6; 2015 ISSN 1833-3850 E-ISSN 1833-8119 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Market Efficiency and Idiosyncratic Volatility

More information

Fundamental, Technical, and Combined Information for Separating Winners from Losers

Fundamental, Technical, and Combined Information for Separating Winners from Losers Fundamental, Technical, and Combined Information for Separating Winners from Losers Prof. Cheng-Few Lee and Wei-Kang Shih Rutgers Business School Oct. 16, 2009 Outline of Presentation Introduction and

More information

Does growth subsume the implications of accruals. for future performance?

Does growth subsume the implications of accruals. for future performance? Does growth subsume the implications of accruals for future performance? Jenny Chu University of California, Berkeley January, 2010 jchu@haas.berkeley.edu Abstract There is ample confusion in the literature

More information

Betting against Beta or Demand for Lottery

Betting against Beta or Demand for Lottery Turan G. Bali 1 Stephen J. Brown 2 Scott Murray 3 Yi Tang 4 1 McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University 2 Stern School of Business, New York University 3 College of Business Administration, University

More information

Internet Appendix Arbitrage Trading: the Long and the Short of It

Internet Appendix Arbitrage Trading: the Long and the Short of It Internet Appendix Arbitrage Trading: the Long and the Short of It Yong Chen Texas A&M University Zhi Da University of Notre Dame Dayong Huang University of North Carolina at Greensboro May 3, 2018 This

More information

Long-Term Rewarded Equity Factors What Can Investors Learn from Academic Research? Felix Goltz

Long-Term Rewarded Equity Factors What Can Investors Learn from Academic Research? Felix Goltz Long-Term Rewarded Equity Factors What Can Investors Learn from Academic Research? Felix Goltz Outline The venerable academic grounding Three Lessons from academic research What academic grounding does

More information

Price Limits and the Value Premium in the Taiwan Stock Market

Price Limits and the Value Premium in the Taiwan Stock Market Price Limits and the Value Premium in the Taiwan Stock Market Chaonan Lin a, Kuan-Cheng Ko b, Lin Lin b, Nien-Tzu Yang c a School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China b Department of Banking

More information

Accruals and Value/Glamour Anomalies: The Same or Related Phenomena?

Accruals and Value/Glamour Anomalies: The Same or Related Phenomena? Accruals and Value/Glamour Anomalies: The Same or Related Phenomena? Gary Taylor Culverhouse School of Accountancy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa AL 35487, USA Tel: 1-205-348-4658 E-mail: gtaylor@cba.ua.edu

More information

Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle

Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle Robert F. Stambaugh The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania and NBER Jianfeng Yu Carlson School of Management University of Minnesota Yu

More information

Underreaction, Trading Volume, and Momentum Profits in Taiwan Stock Market

Underreaction, Trading Volume, and Momentum Profits in Taiwan Stock Market Underreaction, Trading Volume, and Momentum Profits in Taiwan Stock Market Mei-Chen Lin * Abstract This paper uses a very short period to reexamine the momentum effect in Taiwan stock market, focusing

More information

Mispricing Factors. by * Robert F. Stambaugh and Yu Yuan. First Draft: July 4, 2015 This Draft: January 14, Abstract

Mispricing Factors. by * Robert F. Stambaugh and Yu Yuan. First Draft: July 4, 2015 This Draft: January 14, Abstract Mispricing Factors by * Robert F. Stambaugh and Yu Yuan First Draft: July 4, 2015 This Draft: January 14, 2016 Abstract A four-factor model with two mispricing factors, in addition to market and size factors,

More information

Simple Financial Analysis and Abnormal Stock Returns - Analysis of Piotroski s Investment Strategy

Simple Financial Analysis and Abnormal Stock Returns - Analysis of Piotroski s Investment Strategy Simple Financial Analysis and Abnormal Stock Returns - Analysis of Piotroski s Investment Strategy Hauke Rathjens and Hendrik Schellhove Master Thesis in Accounting and Financial Management at the Stockholm

More information

GRA Master Thesis. BI Norwegian Business School - campus Oslo

GRA Master Thesis. BI Norwegian Business School - campus Oslo BI Norwegian Business School - campus Oslo GRA 19502 Master Thesis Component of continuous assessment: Thesis Master of Science Final master thesis Counts 80% of total grade Enhancement of Value Strategies

More information

Investor Clienteles and Asset Pricing Anomalies *

Investor Clienteles and Asset Pricing Anomalies * Investor Clienteles and Asset Pricing Anomalies * David Lesmond Mihail Velikov November 6, 2015 PRELIMINARY DRAFT: DO NOT CITE OR CIRCULATE Abstract This paper shows that the profitability of anomaly trading

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES DIGESTING ANOMALIES: AN INVESTMENT APPROACH. Kewei Hou Chen Xue Lu Zhang

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES DIGESTING ANOMALIES: AN INVESTMENT APPROACH. Kewei Hou Chen Xue Lu Zhang NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES DIGESTING ANOMALIES: AN INVESTMENT APPROACH Kewei Hou Chen Xue Lu Zhang Working Paper 18435 http://www.nber.org/papers/w18435 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts

More information

FIN9014 Asset Pricing Theory (and Empirical Methods in Finance)

FIN9014 Asset Pricing Theory (and Empirical Methods in Finance) FIN9014 Asset Pricing Theory (and Empirical Methods in Finance) Carl H. Lindner College of Business, University of Cincinnati Fall 2014 Instructor: Prof. Hui Guo Phone: (513) 556-7077 Office: 418 Carl

More information

An Alternative Four-Factor Model

An Alternative Four-Factor Model Master Thesis in Finance Stockholm School of Economics Spring 2011 An Alternative Four-Factor Model Abstract In this paper, we add a liquidity factor to the Chen, Novy-Marx & Zhang (2010) three-factor

More information

Information in Order Backlog: Change versus Level. Li Gu Zhiqiang Wang Jianming Ye Fordham University Xiamen University Baruch College.

Information in Order Backlog: Change versus Level. Li Gu Zhiqiang Wang Jianming Ye Fordham University Xiamen University Baruch College. Information in Order Backlog: Change versus Level Li Gu Zhiqiang Wang Jianming Ye Fordham University Xiamen University Baruch College Abstract Information on order backlog has been disclosed in the notes

More information

Momentum and Market Correlation

Momentum and Market Correlation Momentum and Market Correlation Ihsan Badshah, James W. Kolari*, Wei Liu, and Sang-Ook Shin August 15, 2015 Abstract This paper proposes that an important source of momentum profits is market information

More information

Investor Gambling Preference and the Asset Growth Anomaly

Investor Gambling Preference and the Asset Growth Anomaly Investor Gambling Preference and the Asset Growth Anomaly Kuan-Cheng Ko Department of Banking and Finance National Chi Nan University Nien-Tzu Yang Department of Business Management National United University

More information

This is a working draft. Please do not cite without permission from the author.

This is a working draft. Please do not cite without permission from the author. This is a working draft. Please do not cite without permission from the author. Uncertainty and Value Premium: Evidence from the U.S. Agriculture Industry Bruno Arthur and Ani L. Katchova University of

More information

WORKING PAPER SERIES

WORKING PAPER SERIES College of Business Administration University of Rhode Island William A. Orme WORKING PAPER SERIES encouraging creative research A Tale of Two Markets: Stock Return Predictability in China and US Xuanjuan

More information

Value Stocks and Accounting Screens: Has a Good Rule Gone Bad?

Value Stocks and Accounting Screens: Has a Good Rule Gone Bad? Value Stocks and Accounting Screens: Has a Good Rule Gone Bad? Melissa K. Woodley Samford University Steven T. Jones Samford University James P. Reburn Samford University We find that the financial statement

More information

Have we solved the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle?

Have we solved the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle? Have we solved the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle? Roger Loh 1 Kewei Hou 2 1 Singapore Management University 2 Ohio State University Presented by Roger Loh Proseminar SMU Finance Ph.D class Hou and Loh

More information

Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle

Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle Robert F. Stambaugh, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania and NBER Jianfeng Yu, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota

More information

Does Analyst Forecasting Behavior Explain Anomalous Stock Market Reactions to Information in Cash and Accrual Earnings Components?

Does Analyst Forecasting Behavior Explain Anomalous Stock Market Reactions to Information in Cash and Accrual Earnings Components? Does Analyst Forecasting Behavior Explain Anomalous Stock Market Reactions to Information in Cash and Accrual Earnings Components? Dana Hollie a, Phil Shane b, Qiuhong Zhao c a Louisiana State University

More information

Accruals, cash flows, and operating profitability in the. cross section of stock returns

Accruals, cash flows, and operating profitability in the. cross section of stock returns Accruals, cash flows, and operating profitability in the cross section of stock returns Ray Ball 1, Joseph Gerakos 1, Juhani T. Linnainmaa 1,2 and Valeri Nikolaev 1 1 University of Chicago Booth School

More information

Investor attention and commonalities across asset pricing anomalies

Investor attention and commonalities across asset pricing anomalies Investor attention and commonalities across asset pricing anomalies This version: December, 2016 Abstract We comprehensively exam the effects of investor s attention of individual stocks on daily financial

More information

INNOVATIVE EFFICIENCY AND STOCK RETURNS *

INNOVATIVE EFFICIENCY AND STOCK RETURNS * INNOVATIVE EFFICIENCY AND STOCK RETURNS * David Hirshleifer a Po-Hsuan Hsu b Dongmei Li c December 2010 * We thank James Ang, Joao Gomes, Bronwyn Hall, Danling Jiang, Xiaoji Lin, Alfred Liu, Siew Hong

More information

Liquidity Variation and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns *

Liquidity Variation and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns * Liquidity Variation and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns * Fangjian Fu Singapore Management University Wenjin Kang National University of Singapore Yuping Shao National University of Singapore Abstract

More information

ANALYZING MOMENTUM EFFECT IN HIGH AND LOW BOOK-TO-MARKET RATIO FIRMS WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO INDIAN IT, BANKING AND PHARMACY FIRMS ABSTRACT

ANALYZING MOMENTUM EFFECT IN HIGH AND LOW BOOK-TO-MARKET RATIO FIRMS WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO INDIAN IT, BANKING AND PHARMACY FIRMS ABSTRACT ANALYZING MOMENTUM EFFECT IN HIGH AND LOW BOOK-TO-MARKET RATIO FIRMS WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO INDIAN IT, BANKING AND PHARMACY FIRMS 1 Dr.Madhu Tyagi, Professor, School of Management Studies, Ignou, New

More information

External Financing, Access to Debt Markets, and Stock Returns *

External Financing, Access to Debt Markets, and Stock Returns * External Financing, Access to Debt Markets, and Stock Returns * F.Y. Eric C. Lam Department of Economics and Finance City University of Hong Kong 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong Email: campblam@cityu.edu.hk

More information

Undergraduate Student Investment Management Fund

Undergraduate Student Investment Management Fund Undergraduate Student Investment Management Fund Semi-Annual Presentation Friday December 4 th, 2015 1 Meet the Fund 2 Overview of Investment Thesis Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility

More information

Abnormal Return in Growth Incorporated Value Investing

Abnormal Return in Growth Incorporated Value Investing Abnormal Return in Growth Incorporated Value Investing Yanuar Dananjaya * Renna Magdalena 1,2 1.Department of Management, Universitas Pelita Harapan Surabaya, Jl. A. Yani 288 Surabaya-Indonesia 2.Department

More information

The History of the Cross Section of Stock Returns

The History of the Cross Section of Stock Returns The History of the Cross Section of Stock Returns Juhani T. Linnainmaa Michael Roberts February 2016 Abstract Using accounting data spanning the 20th century, we show that most accounting-based return

More information

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY Schwert (2003) defines anomalies as empirical results which are incompatible with maintained theories of asset pricing behavior. Asset pricing describes

More information

ANOMALIES AND NEWS JOEY ENGELBERG (UCSD) R. DAVID MCLEAN (GEORGETOWN) JEFFREY PONTIFF (BOSTON COLLEGE)

ANOMALIES AND NEWS JOEY ENGELBERG (UCSD) R. DAVID MCLEAN (GEORGETOWN) JEFFREY PONTIFF (BOSTON COLLEGE) ANOMALIES AND NEWS JOEY ENGELBERG (UCSD) R. DAVID MCLEAN (GEORGETOWN) JEFFREY PONTIFF (BOSTON COLLEGE) 3 RD ANNUAL NEWS & FINANCE CONFERENCE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MARCH 8, 2018 Background and Motivation

More information

Discussion Paper No. DP 07/02

Discussion Paper No. DP 07/02 SCHOOL OF ACCOUNTING, FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT Essex Finance Centre Can the Cross-Section Variation in Expected Stock Returns Explain Momentum George Bulkley University of Exeter Vivekanand Nawosah University

More information

DOES ACADEMIC RESEARCH DESTROY STOCK RETURN PREDICTABILITY?

DOES ACADEMIC RESEARCH DESTROY STOCK RETURN PREDICTABILITY? DOES ACADEMIC RESEARCH DESTROY STOCK RETURN PREDICTABILITY? R. DAVID MCLEAN (ALBERTA) JEFFREY PONTIFF (BOSTON COLLEGE) Q -GROUP OCTOBER 20, 2014 Our Research Question 2 Academic research has uncovered

More information

Monotonicity in Asset Returns: New Tests with Applications to the Term Structure, the CAPM and Portfolio Sorts

Monotonicity in Asset Returns: New Tests with Applications to the Term Structure, the CAPM and Portfolio Sorts Monotonicity in Asset Returns: New Tests with Applications to the Term Structure, the CAPM and Portfolio Sorts Andrew Patton and Allan Timmermann Oxford/Duke and UC-San Diego June 2009 Motivation Many

More information

Dose the Firm Life Cycle Matter on Idiosyncratic Risk?

Dose the Firm Life Cycle Matter on Idiosyncratic Risk? DOI: 10.7763/IPEDR. 2012. V54. 26 Dose the Firm Life Cycle Matter on Idiosyncratic Risk? Jen-Sin Lee 1, Chwen-Huey Jiee 2 and Chu-Yun Wei 2 + 1 Department of Finance, I-Shou University 2 Postgraduate programs

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES ARBITRAGE ASYMMETRY AND THE IDIOSYNCRATIC VOLATILITY PUZZLE. Robert F. Stambaugh Jianfeng Yu Yu Yuan

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES ARBITRAGE ASYMMETRY AND THE IDIOSYNCRATIC VOLATILITY PUZZLE. Robert F. Stambaugh Jianfeng Yu Yu Yuan NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES ARBITRAGE ASYMMETRY AND THE IDIOSYNCRATIC VOLATILITY PUZZLE Robert F. Stambaugh Jianfeng Yu Yu Yuan Working Paper 18560 http://www.nber.org/papers/w18560 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC

More information

Core CFO and Future Performance. Abstract

Core CFO and Future Performance. Abstract Core CFO and Future Performance Rodrigo S. Verdi Sloan School of Management Massachusetts Institute of Technology 50 Memorial Drive E52-403A Cambridge, MA 02142 rverdi@mit.edu Abstract This paper investigates

More information

The Predictability of Equity Returns from Past Returns: A New Moving Average-Based Perspective

The Predictability of Equity Returns from Past Returns: A New Moving Average-Based Perspective The Predictability of Equity Returns from Past Returns: A New Moving Average-Based Perspective Doron Avramov a Guy Kaplanski b Avanidhar Subrahmanyam c Keywords: market efficiency, technical analysis,

More information

What Explains the Asset Growth Effect in Stock Returns?

What Explains the Asset Growth Effect in Stock Returns? What Explains the Asset Growth Effect in Stock Returns? Marc L. Lipson Darden Graduate School of Business Administration University of Virginia, Box 6550 Charlottesville, VA 22906 mlipson@virginia.edu

More information

INVESTOR MISPERCEPTIONS OF BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION: NET OPERATING ASSETS AND THE SUSTAINABILITY OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. David Hirshleifer*

INVESTOR MISPERCEPTIONS OF BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION: NET OPERATING ASSETS AND THE SUSTAINABILITY OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. David Hirshleifer* INVESTOR MISPERCEPTIONS OF BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION: NET OPERATING ASSETS AND THE SUSTAINABILITY OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE David Hirshleifer* Kewei Hou* Siew Hong Teoh* Yinglei Zhang* *Fisher College of

More information

Short- and Long-Horizon Behavioral Factors

Short- and Long-Horizon Behavioral Factors Short- and Long-Horizon Behavioral Factors Kent Daniel, David Hirshleifer and Lin Sun February 27, 2018 Abstract Recent theories suggest that both risk and mispricing are associated with commonality in

More information

Internet Appendix. Table A1: Determinants of VOIB

Internet Appendix. Table A1: Determinants of VOIB Internet Appendix Table A1: Determinants of VOIB Each month, we regress VOIB on firm size and proxies for N, v δ, and v z. OIB_SHR is the monthly order imbalance defined as (B S)/(B+S), where B (S) is

More information

Time-Varying Momentum Payoffs and Illiquidity*

Time-Varying Momentum Payoffs and Illiquidity* Time-Varying Momentum Payoffs and Illiquidity* Doron Avramov Si Cheng and Allaudeen Hameed Current Draft: August, 2013 * Doron Avramov is from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem (email: doron.avromov@huji.ac.il).

More information

EXPLANATIONS FOR THE MOMENTUM PREMIUM

EXPLANATIONS FOR THE MOMENTUM PREMIUM Tobias Moskowitz, Ph.D. Summer 2010 Fama Family Professor of Finance University of Chicago Booth School of Business EXPLANATIONS FOR THE MOMENTUM PREMIUM Momentum is a well established empirical fact whose

More information

Firm-Specific Estimates of Differential Persistence and their Incremental Usefulness for Forecasting and Valuation

Firm-Specific Estimates of Differential Persistence and their Incremental Usefulness for Forecasting and Valuation THE ACCOUNTING REVIEW Vol. 91, No. 3 May 2016 pp. 811 833 American Accounting Association DOI: 10.2308/accr-51233 Firm-Specific Estimates of Differential Persistence and their Incremental Usefulness for

More information

Industries and Stock Return Reversals

Industries and Stock Return Reversals Industries and Stock Return Reversals Allaudeen Hameed 1 Department of Finance NUS Business School National University of Singapore Singapore E-mail: bizah@nus.edu.sg Joshua Huang SBI Ven Capital Pte Ltd.

More information

Research Statement. Alexander Barinov. Terry College of Business University of Georgia. September 2014

Research Statement. Alexander Barinov. Terry College of Business University of Georgia. September 2014 Research Statement Alexander Barinov Terry College of Business University of Georgia September 2014 1 Achievements Summary In my six years at University of Georgia, I produced nine completed papers. Four

More information

Factor Momentum and the Momentum Factor

Factor Momentum and the Momentum Factor Factor Momentum and the Momentum Factor Sina Ehsani Juhani Linnainmaa First draft: March 2017 This draft: January 2019 Abstract Momentum in individual stock returns emanates from momentum in factor returns.

More information

Betting Against Correlation:

Betting Against Correlation: Betting Against Correlation: Testing Making Theories Leverage for Aversion the Low-Risk Great Again Effect (#MLAGA) Clifford S. Asness Managing and Founding Principal For Institutional Investor Use Only

More information

An analysis of momentum and contrarian strategies using an optimal orthogonal portfolio approach

An analysis of momentum and contrarian strategies using an optimal orthogonal portfolio approach An analysis of momentum and contrarian strategies using an optimal orthogonal portfolio approach Hossein Asgharian and Björn Hansson Department of Economics, Lund University Box 7082 S-22007 Lund, Sweden

More information

A Search for Rational Sources of Stock Return Anomalies: Evidence from India

A Search for Rational Sources of Stock Return Anomalies: Evidence from India A Search for Rational Sources of Stock Return Anomalies: Evidence from India Sanjay Sehgal Professor of Finance, Department of Financial Studies University of Delhi, India E-mail: sanjayfin15@yahoo.co.in

More information

A Tale of Two Anomalies: The Implication of Investor Attention for Price and Earnings Momentum

A Tale of Two Anomalies: The Implication of Investor Attention for Price and Earnings Momentum A Tale of Two Anomalies: The Implication of Investor Attention for Price and Earnings Momentum Kewei Hou, Lin Peng and Wei Xiong December 19, 2006 Abstract We examine the profitability of price and earnings

More information

A Lottery Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly. Online Appendix

A Lottery Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly. Online Appendix A Lottery Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly Online Appendix Section I provides details of the calculation of the variables used in the paper. Section II examines the robustness of the beta anomaly.

More information

The Short of It: Investor Sentiment and Anomalies

The Short of It: Investor Sentiment and Anomalies The Short of It: Investor Sentiment and Anomalies by * Robert F. Stambaugh, Jianfeng Yu, and Yu Yuan January 26, 2011 Abstract This study explores the role of investor sentiment in a broad set of anomalies

More information

Mutual fund herding behavior and investment strategies in Chinese stock market

Mutual fund herding behavior and investment strategies in Chinese stock market Mutual fund herding behavior and investment strategies in Chinese stock market AUTHORS ARTICLE INFO DOI John Wei-Shan Hu Yen-Hsien Lee Ying-Chuang Chen John Wei-Shan Hu, Yen-Hsien Lee and Ying-Chuang Chen

More information

Investment-Based Underperformance Following Seasoned Equity Offering. Evgeny Lyandres. Lu Zhang University of Rochester and NBER

Investment-Based Underperformance Following Seasoned Equity Offering. Evgeny Lyandres. Lu Zhang University of Rochester and NBER Investment-Based Underperformance Following Seasoned Equity Offering Evgeny Lyandres Rice University Le Sun University of Rochester Lu Zhang University of Rochester and NBER University of Texas at Austin

More information

Heterogeneous Beliefs and Momentum Profits

Heterogeneous Beliefs and Momentum Profits JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS Vol. 44, No. 4, Aug. 2009, pp. 795 822 COPYRIGHT 2009, MICHAEL G. FOSTER SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE, WA 98195 doi:10.1017/s0022109009990214

More information

Dispersion in Analysts Earnings Forecasts and Credit Rating

Dispersion in Analysts Earnings Forecasts and Credit Rating Dispersion in Analysts Earnings Forecasts and Credit Rating Doron Avramov Department of Finance Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland davramov@rhsmith.umd.edu Tarun Chordia Department

More information

The beta anomaly? Stock s quality matters!

The beta anomaly? Stock s quality matters! The beta anomaly? Stock s quality matters! John M. Geppert a (corresponding author) a University of Nebraska Lincoln College of Business 425P Lincoln, NE, USA, 8588-0490 402-472-3370 jgeppert1@unl.edu

More information

Using Volatility to Improve Momentum Strategies

Using Volatility to Improve Momentum Strategies International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 7, No. 7; July 2016 Using Volatility to Improve Momentum Strategies Omar Khlaif Gharaibeh Al al-bayt University P.O.BOX130040, Mafraq 25113 Jordan

More information

April 13, Abstract

April 13, Abstract R 2 and Momentum Kewei Hou, Lin Peng, and Wei Xiong April 13, 2005 Abstract This paper examines the relationship between price momentum and investors private information, using R 2 -based information measures.

More information

Daily Winners and Losers a

Daily Winners and Losers a Daily Winners and Losers a Alok Kumar b, Stefan Ruenzi, Michael Ungeheuer c First Version: November 2016; This Version: March 2017 Abstract The probably most salient feature of the cross-section of stock

More information

Accruals, Heterogeneous Beliefs, and Stock Returns

Accruals, Heterogeneous Beliefs, and Stock Returns Accruals, Heterogeneous Beliefs, and Stock Returns Emma Y. Peng An Yan* and Meng Yan Fordham University 1790 Broadway, 13 th Floor New York, NY 10019 Feburary 2012 *Corresponding author. Tel: (212)636-7401

More information

Earnings Announcements are Full of Surprises. Michael W. Brandt a Runeet Kishore b Pedro Santa-Clara c Mohan Venkatachalam d

Earnings Announcements are Full of Surprises. Michael W. Brandt a Runeet Kishore b Pedro Santa-Clara c Mohan Venkatachalam d Earnings Announcements are Full of Surprises Michael W. Brandt a Runeet Kishore b Pedro Santa-Clara c Mohan Venkatachalam d This version: January 22, 2008 Abstract We study the drift in returns of portfolios

More information

AN ALTERNATIVE THREE-FACTOR MODEL FOR INTERNATIONAL MARKETS: EVIDENCE FROM THE EUROPEAN MONETARY UNION

AN ALTERNATIVE THREE-FACTOR MODEL FOR INTERNATIONAL MARKETS: EVIDENCE FROM THE EUROPEAN MONETARY UNION AN ALTERNATIVE THREE-FACTOR MODEL FOR INTERNATIONAL MARKETS: EVIDENCE FROM THE EUROPEAN MONETARY UNION MANUEL AMMANN SANDRO ODONI DAVID OESCH WORKING PAPERS ON FINANCE NO. 2012/2 SWISS INSTITUTE OF BANKING

More information

Industries and Stock Return Reversals

Industries and Stock Return Reversals Industries and Stock Return Reversals Allaudeen Hameed Department of Finance NUS Business School National University of Singapore Singapore E-mail: bizah@nus.edu.sg Joshua Huang SBI Ven Capital Pte Ltd.

More information