IMPACT EVALUATION OF A LOCAL EMPOWERMENT PROJECT:A CASE STUDY OF THE COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (CSDP) BY HASSAN ISHAQ IBRAHIM
|
|
|
- Leona Sims
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IMPACT EVALUATION OF A LOCAL EMPOWERMENT PROJECT:A CASE STUDY OF THE COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (CSDP) BY HASSAN ISHAQ IBRAHIM DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS AND EXTENSION FEDERAL UNIVERSITY DUTSIN- MA KATSINA STATE, NIGERA. Hassibrahim@yahoo.com
2 BRIEF ON CSDP The CSDP emerged from the merger of two previous CCD Projects in Nigeria, i.e Local Empowerment and Environmental Management Project (LEEMP) and Community-Based Poverty Reduction Project (CPRP)
3 Project Development Objective To support empowerment of communities and Local Governments for sustainable increased access of poor people to improved social and natural resource infrastructure services.
4 Project Components Federal Level Coordination and Program Support-Ministry of Finance/FPSU LGA/Sectoral Ministries Capacity and Partnership Building-implemented by the State. Community-Driven Investments
5 COMMUNITY DRIVEN INVESTMENTS This component is managed by the State Agencies. Funding is provided for Community Development Plans (CDPs) of selected communities based on specific criteria, including broadbased community participation in plan formulation, micro-project identification and preparation, and a matching contribution from communities.
6 Project Implementation process State Level Institutions; State Agency Board, State Agency (SA), Relevant Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs). Local Government Level Institutions; Local Government Review Committee (LGRC), Local Government Desk Office (LGDO) Community Level Institutions; Community Project Management Committee (CPMC), Sub- Committees (for various functions). Duration:
7 FUNDING The Federal Government of Nigeria International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank Group State and Local Governments Communities
8 OBJECTIVES OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION assess changes in the well-being of individuals, households or communities that can be attributed to the CSDP Determine the Comparative cost of CSDP interventions Duration:
9 Sector SAMPLING PROCEDURE Approved MPs Inception to date Complet ed MPs Inceptio n to date MPs that meet IEA Selectio n criteria MPs Sample d in survey Benefitting communiti es sampled ( and Household s) Non- Benefitting communiti es sampled ( and Household s) Education (75) 5(75) Water (75) 5(75) Health (60) 4(60) Transport (60) 4(60) Rural Electrifica tion (60) 4(60)
10 Data Sources Focus Group Discussion Key Informant Interviews Household Survey
11 DATA ANALYSIS The Difference-in-Differences (DID) method was be used for the impact evaluation The impact or causal effect (α) of the project (P) on an outcome of interest (Y) is given by; α= (YIP=1) - (YIP=0), This gives the difference between the outcome of with (P=1) and without (P=0) the project.
12 Household Characteristics variables Definition Treated Control Age of Household Head (years) % within age bracket of Gender of Household Head % of male Household Heads Income generated per year % of Households with more than N240,000 annual income Marital status % of married respondents Formal Education (years) % owith more than 6 years of formal education Household size (numbers) Experience in primary occupation (years) Membership of association Engagement in agricultural activities % with more than 7 individuals in the household % of respondents with more than 10 years of experience % of respondents who were members of associations % of respondents who are engaged in agricultural activities
13 Household Characteristics, 2013 S/N Dimensions Treated Communities Control Communities 1 Meeting attendance rate (%) Level of Trust Index: Decision Making Index Labor Contribution to aasoiations (Average number of Days/person) 5 Cash Contribution/person: N
14 Type of project Comparative Cost Analysis (NAIRA) CSDP (a) State Govt (b) Local Govern ment (c) Other agencies (d) Total alternative cost (e) Sum (b+c+d) Average alternati ve cost (f) = e/3 Cost comp arati ve ratio f/a Classroom Health Centre Motorized Borehole Hand pump borehole Rural roads (cost per kilometer) Mini bridge
15 Indicator impact for Education Projects Unit of Measure impact no of school age children enrolled in schools (male) Number 112 no of school age children enrolled in schools (female) Number 76 Average time taken to get to school Minutes -20 Average distance taken to get to school Km -4 Average school attendance (male) Number 56 Average school attendance (female) Number 12 Students learning sciences (male) Number 22 Students learning sciences (female) Number 9
16 Indicator impact for Water projects Unit of Measure impact People fetching water for domestic use (male) Number People fetching water for domestic use (female) Number People using water facility Percentage 74 Reduction in cost of water Percentage 80 Average distance to water source Km Average time spent fetching water Minutes Reduction in the number of reported cases of water borne diseases Percentage -65
17 Indicator impact for Health Projects Unit of Measure impact People attending Health Centers for treatment/counseling People attending ante-natal/postnatal clinic Number Number Children immunized Number Average distance to health centers Km -3.3 Average time to health centers Minutes -59.3
18 impact for transportation Projects Indicator Unit of Measure impact Reduction in average travel time on rehabilitated/ constructed road Percentage Reduction in cost of transportation Naira
19 impact for electrification Projects Indicator Unit of Measure Impact Households connected to electricity Number Small scale businesses established Number 21 Increase in recreation centers established (viewing centres) percentage 33.65
20 CONCLUSION CDD approach in Project implementation can help achieve the desired results in terms of community empowerment and access to social amenities. Continuous funding of local communities is a prerequisite for the Sustainability of CDD approach. Capacity building for Local officials is key to mainstreaming CDD approach into local planning and budgeting.
21 THANK YOU
BASELINE SURVEY OF MINORITY CONCENTRATION DISTRICT. Executive Summary of Leh District (Jammu and Kashmir)
BASELINE SURVEY OF MINORITY CONCENTRATION DISTRICT Background: Executive Summary of Leh District (Jammu and Kashmir) The Ministry of Minority Affairs (GOI) has identified 90 minority concentrated backward
HOMA BAY SOCIAL SECTOR BUDGET BRIEF
HOMA BAY SOCIAL SECTOR BUDGET BRIEF (213-14 to 215-16) Highlights In 215-216, Homa Bay County spent Ksh 5.8 billion, out of which 36 per cent was spent on social sector. The absorption rate declined in
Earthquake 2005 Recovery and Reconstruction
Earthquake 2005 Recovery and Reconstruction 2 Earthquake 8 Oct 2005 Nine Districts 1. MANSHERA 2. BATAGRAM 3. SHANGLA 4. ABBOTTABAD 5. KOHISTAN Epicentre 6. MUZAFFARABAD 7. NELUM 8. BAGH 9. RAWALAKOT Depth:
Strategy beyond Twelfth Five Year Plan - Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals
Strategy beyond Twelfth Five Year Plan - Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals Demographic Indicators Indicator Himachal Pradesh (Census 2011) All India Population (million) 6.8 1210 Decennial Growth
TRANSFORMING THE LIVES OF RURAL WOMEN AND GIRLS THROUGH GENDER AND EQUITY BUDGETING
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA TRANSFORMING THE LIVES OF RURAL WOMEN AND GIRLS THROUGH GENDER AND EQUITY BUDGETING A Concept Note for the Side Event by Government of Uganda At the 62 nd Session of the Commission
KAKAMEGA SOCIAL SECTOR BUDGET BRIEF
KAKAMEGA SOCIAL SECTOR BUDGET BRIEF (2013-14 to 2015-16) Highlights In 2015-2016, county spent Ksh 9.9 billion, out of which 36 per cent was spent on social sector. Between 2013-2014 and 2015-2016, along
Welcome to Presentation of Twelfth Five Year Plan and Annual Plan Proposal Madhya Pradesh. May 11, 2012
Welcome to Presentation of Twelfth Five Year Plan and Annual Plan Proposal Madhya Pradesh May 11, 2012 1 ACHIEVEMENTS OF ELEVENTH PLAN (ECONOMY) Targets and Achievement Sector Target for Growth Expected
Tracking Government Investments for Nutrition at Country Level Patrizia Fracassi, Clara Picanyol, 03 rd July 2014
Tracking Government Investments for Nutrition at Country Level Patrizia Fracassi, Clara Picanyol, 03 rd July 2014 1. Introduction Having reliable data is essential to policy makers to prioritise, to plan,
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY POLICY (CSR POLICY)
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY POLICY (CSR POLICY) 1. TITLE AND APPLICABILITY The Document describes the Corporate Social Responsibility Policy ( CSR Policy ) of M/s. Modi Builders and Realtors Private
Empowerment of Civil Servants through Savings and Credit Cooperative Society (SACCOS): Evidences from Institute of Accountancy Arusha
Empowerment of Civil Servants through Savings and Credit Cooperative Society (SACCOS): Evidences from Institute of Accountancy Arusha Chalicha Sila Arusha-Tanzania csila2004@gmail.com ABSTRACT The aim
Session C Ownership and Alignment. Gender responsive Budgets in Morocco: illustration of the Paris Declaration Alignment and Ownership principles
WORKSHOP ON DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS IN PRACTICE: APPLYING THE PARIS DECLARATION TO ADVANCING GENDER EQUALITY, ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS DUBLIN, IRELAND 26-27 APRIL 2007 Session C
Day 1, Session 3, UN Workshop on Improving the Intergation of a Gender Perspective inti Official Chiba, Japan April 2013
Day 1, Session 3, UN Workshop on Improving the Intergation of a Gender Perspective inti Official Statistics @ Chiba, Japan 16-19 April 2013 Saidah Hashim (Ms.) Manpower & Social Statistics Division Department
GARISSA SOCIAL SECTOR BUDGET BRIEF
GARISSA SOCIAL SECTOR BUDGET BRIEF (2013-14 to 2015-16) Highlights In 2015-2016, county spent Ksh 6.5 billion, out of which 41 per cent was spent on social sector. Efficient administrative practices has
SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
TIME USE SURVEY MONGOLIA
TIME USE SURVEY MONGOLIA NSO Mongolia CONTENT Country context Time use survey - Introduction Objectives Sampling and survey design Data collection Data processing 1 3 Territory: 1.5 million km 2 (19 th
2011 Annual Socio- Economic Report
2011 Annual Socio- Economic Report This abstract contains the Nigerian Unemployment Report 2011 National Bureau of Statistics Page 1 Introduction Employment Statistics is a section under the General Household
SOUTH DAKOTA KIDS COUNT BEACOM SCHOOL OF BUSINESS UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA 414 E. CLARK STREET VERMILLION, SD
Brookings County Compared to o SDSD Undergrad Enrollment approximately 11,225 o USD Undergrad Enrollment approximately 7,600 o Brookings County 1 year population estimate for 2013 is 32,968 o 1 year population
Retirement Savings Account (RSA) Membership Distribution
Retirement Savings Account (RSA) Membership Distribution (Q1 2017) Report Date: April 2017 Data Source: National Bureau of Statistics / National Pension Commission Contents Executive Summary Retirement
Business Statistics, Cdn. Ed., 3e (Sharpe) Chapter 2: Data. Short Answer - Quiz A
Business Statistics, Cdn. Ed., 3e (Sharpe) Chapter 2: Data Short Answer - Quiz A 1) The mission of a research firm is to "explore the impact of the Internet on families, communities, work, home, and daily
KENYA'S VISION 2030: AN AUDIT FROM AN INCOME AND GENDER INEQUALITIES PERSPECTIVE. SID Society for International Development
KENYA'S VISION 2030: AN AUDIT FROM AN INCOME AND GENDER INEQUALITIES PERSPECTIVE SID Society for International Development I Contents Section 1 List of Abbreviations and Acronyms x Executive Summary xiv
Working conditions in Zanzibar
Introduction National context Methodology Survey findings Policy considerations References Wyattville Road, Loughlinstown, Dublin 18, Ireland. - Tel: (+353 1) 204 31 00 - Fax: 282 42 09 / 282 64 56 email:
SUPERIOR-GREENSTONE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
SUPERIOR-GREENSTONE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD Section Management Guideline BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION TRAVEL, MEALS, and HOSPITALITY EXPENDITURES Applicable Policy TRAVEL, MEALS, and HOSPITALITY EXPENDITURES
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 602894 Central Cities (CC) 227,818 Outside Central Cities 375,076 Percent of Entire MSA 37.79% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1187941 Central Cities (CC) 511,843 Outside Central Cities 676,098 Percent of Entire MSA 43.09% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 661645 Central Cities (CC) 247,057 Outside Central Cities 414,588 Percent of Entire MSA 37.34% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 583845 Central Cities (CC) 316,649 Outside Central Cities 267,196 Percent of Entire MSA 54.24% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1251509 Central Cities (CC) 540,423 Outside Central Cities 711,086 Percent of Entire MSA 43.18% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1135614 Central Cities (CC) 677,766 Outside Central Cities 457,848 Percent of Entire MSA 59.68% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 591932 Central Cities (CC) 260,970 Outside Central Cities 330,962 Percent of Entire MSA 44.09% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1100491 Central Cities (CC) 735,617 Outside Central Cities 364,874 Percent of Entire MSA 66.84% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 540258 Central Cities (CC) 198,915 Outside Central Cities 341,343 Percent of Entire MSA 36.82% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1249763 Central Cities (CC) 691,295 Outside Central Cities 558,468 Percent of Entire MSA 55.31% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1088514 Central Cities (CC) 272,953 Outside Central Cities 815,561 Percent of Entire MSA 25.08% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 922516 Central Cities (CC) 470,859 Outside Central Cities 451,657 Percent of Entire MSA 51.04% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 687249 Central Cities (CC) 198,500 Outside Central Cities 488,749 Percent of Entire MSA 28.88% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 542149 Central Cities (CC) 181870 Outside Central Cities 360279 Percent of Entire MSA 33.55% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1025598 Central Cities (CC) 293,834 Outside Central Cities 731,764 Percent of Entire MSA 28.65% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 875583 Central Cities (CC) 232,835 Outside Central Cities 642,748 Percent of Entire MSA 26.59% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 716998 Central Cities (CC) 448,275 Outside Central Cities 268,723 Percent of Entire MSA 62.52% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1333914 Central Cities (CC) 284,943 Outside Central Cities 1,048,971 Percent of Entire MSA 21.36% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 712738 Central Cities (CC) 448,607 Outside Central Cities 264,131 Percent of Entire MSA 62.94% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
STATUS OF PROJECTS IN EXECUTION FY10 SOPE SOUTH ASIA REGION. Nepal. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized
Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized STATUS OF PROJECTS IN EXECUTION FY10 SOPE Nepal Operations Policy and Country Services
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean. Population Entire MSA
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1169641 Central Cities (CC) 0 Outside Central Cities 1,169,641 Percent of Entire MSA 0% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999 to
TURKANA SOCIAL SECTOR BUDGET BRIEF
TURKANA SOCIAL SECTOR BUDGET BRIEF (2013-14 to 2015-16) Highlights In 2015-2016, county spent Ksh 10.2 billion, out of which 28 per cent was spent on social sector. Overall, execution of development budget
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 3251876 Central Cities (CC) 2,078,750 Outside Central Cities 1,173,126 Percent of Entire MSA 63.92% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1592383 Central Cities (CC) 1,181,140 Outside Central Cities 411,243 Percent of Entire MSA 74.17% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1776062 Central Cities (CC) 716,793 Outside Central Cities 1,059,269 Percent of Entire MSA 40.36% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 4112198 Central Cities (CC) 416,474 Outside Central Cities 3,695,724 Percent of Entire MSA 10.13% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 9519338 Central Cities (CC) 4408996 Outside Central Cities 5110342 Percent of Entire MSA 46.32% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1623018 Central Cities (CC) 152397 Outside Central Cities 1470621 Percent of Entire MSA 9.39% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1731183 Central Cities (CC) 776733 Outside Central Cities 954450 Percent of Entire MSA 44.87% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2968806 Central Cities (CC) 669,769 Outside Central Cities 2,299,037 Percent of Entire MSA 22.56% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2846289 Central Cities (CC) 809063 Outside Central Cities 2037226 Percent of Entire MSA 28.43% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 4441551 Central Cities (CC) 1147720 Outside Central Cities 3293831 Percent of Entire MSA 25.84% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1500741 Central Cities (CC) 661799 Outside Central Cities 838942 Percent of Entire MSA 44.1% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2552994 Central Cities (CC) 686992 Outside Central Cities 1866002 Percent of Entire MSA 26.91% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
The World Bank. Key Dates. Project Development Objectives. Components. Public Disclosure Authorized. Implementation Status & Results Report
Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized AFRICA Nigeria Governance Global Practice IBRD/IDA Specific Investment Loan FY 2012 Seq
Country profile Remuneration Spain
Support for continued data collection and analysis concerning mobility patterns and career paths of researchers Country profile Remuneration Spain 1 RESEARCHER REMUNERATION IN ACADEMIA 2 1.0 Introduction
Ground Water Development Project
Malawi Ground Water Development Project Project Sites North Kawinga 1. Background of Project The lack of water due to drought had become a serious threat to the people of Malawi, and it had become an urgent
FAQs: The World Bank and Sudan and Southern Sudan
WORLD BANK January 11, 2011 FAQs: The World Bank and Sudan and Southern Sudan Q1: What kind of assistance does the World Bank provide to Sudan? A1: Since Sudan s 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA),
LIST OF TABLES Census wise Sex Ratio in India 100
LIST OF TABLES 1. 1.1 Progress of Microfinance as on 31 st March 2009. 05 2. 2.1 3. 2.2 Share of rural household debt by source of credit, All India, 1951-1991 Advances to Agriculture and Other Priority
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2414616 Central Cities (CC) 764431 Outside Central Cities 1650185 Percent of Entire MSA 31.66% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
The Relationship between Psychological Distress and Psychological Wellbeing
The Relationship between Psychological Distress and Psychological Wellbeing - Kessler 10 and Various Wellbeing Scales - The Assessment of the Determinants and Epidemiology of Psychological Distress (ADEPD)
Tell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you.
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE TWO (2) YEAR ACT PROGRAMME STARTING IN: 2016
CODE Eduloan Bursary Self payment APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE TWO (2) YEAR ACT PROGRAMME STARTING IN: 2016 PLEASE ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING WITH YOUR APPLICATION FORM Certified copy of your identity document
Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Update. Nigeria
Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Update Briefing note for countries on the 2018 Statistical Update Introduction Nigeria This briefing note is organized into ten sections. The
at 8 th IAEG-SDGs Proportion of men, women and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definition
indicators and changes made at 8 th meeting of the IAEG-SDGs Target Indicator / changes made at 8 th IAEG-SDGs 1.2 1.2.2 Proportion of men, women and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions
Glanworth Neighbourhood Profile
Glanworth Profile For further information contact: John-Paul Sousa Planning Research Analyst Direct: (519) 661-2500 ext. 5989 I email: jpsousa@london.ca Page 1 Page 2 Population Characteristics & Age Distribution
Brockley Neighbourhood Profile
Brockley Profile For further information contact: John-Paul Sousa Planning Research Analyst Direct: (519) 661-2500 ext. 5989 I email: jpsousa@london.ca Page 1 Page 2 Population Characteristics & Age Distribution
Montana State University MESA Program POTENTIAL PARTICIPANT APPLICATION FORM
Montana State University MESA Program POTENTIAL PARTICIPANT APPLICATION FORM Date: / / To ensure you qualify for the Matched Education Savings Account (MESA) Program, please read the MESA Frequently Asked
Papua New Guinea & Asian Development Bank: A Partnership in Addressing Connectivi
David Hill Country Director Asian Developmen Papua New Guinea & Asian Development Bank: A Partnership in Addressing Connectivi The current and future pipeline of projects supporting an enabling environment
Jörg Holla Jahnstraße Mettenheim, Germany Phone: ;
Curriculum Vitae Personal Data Name: Jörg Holla Date of Birth: 03.05.1951 Place of Residence: Marital Status: Jahnstr.6, 67582 Mettenheim, married Summary Economist with 40 years of experience in development
THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF MACHAKOS THE COUNTY TREASURY PROGRAMMME BASED BUDGET FY 2015/2016
REPUBLIC OF KENYA THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF MACHAKOS THE COUNTY TREASURY PROGRAMMME BASED BUDGET FY JUNE 2015 0 Table of contents Table of contents... 1 Revenue Estimates FY 2015/16-2017-18... 2 Summary