TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE Item Number: 3
|
|
- Lawrence McDaniel
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD COMPENSATION COMMITTEE Item Number: 3 SUBJECT: Report and Recommendations from Labor Market Compensation Analysis for Statutory Positions CONSENT: ATTACHMENT(S): 2 ACTION: X DATE OF MEETING: / 90 mins INFORMATION: PRESENTER(S): Melissa Norcia/ Michael Oak, McLagan Partners/Axay Patel, Aon Hewitt PURPOSE The purpose of this item is to provide the committee with a report and recommendations on a labor market compensation analysis for positions under the board s compensation setting authority and to assist the committee in its assessment of whether changes to salary ranges or incentive plan components are warranted. BACKGROUND Education Code Section gives the board authorization to determine compensation of specific CalSTRS Executive management and Investment staff. The board has compensation setting authority for the following positions: Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Investment Officer (CIO), Deputy Chief Investment Officer, Investment Directors, Portfolio Managers, Associate Portfolio Managers, Investment Operations Director, System Actuary and General Counsel. Effective January 1, 2017, the Section was amended (AB 736) to include the positions of Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. As delineated in the Board Policy Manual Section 700 Compensation Policy for Designated Executive Management and Investment Staff, relevant market compensation data will be secured from reputable, third party sources, every two years or as otherwise determined by the TRB s Compensation Committee. Per the committee s direction, a report on a labor market compensation analysis for statutory positions was placed on the committee s work plan. The last time the committee evaluated labor market data for investment positions under the board s salary setting authority was during the 2012/2013 plan year. At its September 2016 meeting, the committee directed Michael Oak, Director at McLagan Partners, to provide a labor market analysis that included the value of benefits in the compensation package in addition to the total cash compensation (base salary + annual incentive) provided in previous studies. At its November 2016 meeting, the committee reviewed three proposed alternatives with varying levels of compensation detail and associated costs. The committee selected the alternative that would present, in detail, components of total rewards (base salary + annual incentive +long-term incentives, + retirement and health benefits) for each classification at various service scenarios (e.g., <5, 5, 10, 20 years of service). The committee COMP 6
2 Compensation Committee Meeting Item 3 Page 2 discussed that although this level of detail may not be required for future compensation studies, it would be beneficial to receive a complete picture of total reward compensation at this time. DISCUSSION For this discussion Michael Oak, Director at McLagan Partners and Axay Patel, Actuarial Consultant Retirement and Investment at Aon Hewitt will present to the committee a Labor Market Compensation Analysis/Total Rewards Review that will inform on five key items. Bradford Klinck, Partner Retirement and Investment and Paul Harris, Senior Vice President Health and Benefits from Aon Hewitt will participate via teleconference. Their presentation is included in. 1. Total Rewards Findings. McLagan and Aon Hewitt compared CalSTRS total rewards (base salary + annual incentive + retirement and health benefits) to the competitive market (pay + annual incentive + long-term incentives + retirement and health benefits). McLagan and Aon Hewitt will walk the committee through the findings. In summary, the review revealed the following: CalSTRS benefit value represents a small portion of its total rewards (base salary + annual incentive + retirement and health benefits). The CalSTRS benefit value doesn t influence its positioning in the competitive market in a meaningful way. Long-term incentives within the peer group are a key driver for CalSTRS positioning below market (median). The findings support the discussion involving a comprehensive review of CalSTRS incentive plan structure for the FY work plan, proposed in today s agenda Item # Chief Operating Officer (COO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) - Setting base salary and incentive opportunity. Education Code was recently amended to include the positions of Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. McLagan is recommending the following base salary and incentive opportunity for the COO and CFO positions: Salary + 40% Incentive Min: $204,000 Min: $285,000 Mid: $250,000 Mid: $350,000 Max: $296,000 Max: $415,000 The amended Education Code includes a provision that limits annual salary increase amounts for current incumbents in these positions. The statute states, in part: The annual percentage increase in salary that may be paid pursuant to this section to a person who served as chief financial officer or as chief operating officer on January 1, 2016, and who does not separate from service in that position prior to the date on which the increase is applied, shall not exceed either of the following: COMP 7
3 Compensation Committee Meeting Item 3 Page 3 (1) Ten percent for the fiscal year. (2) Five percent for any fiscal year subsequent to If the committee moves to adopt McLagan s recommendations as presented, an interim minimum will need to be established in order to facilitate the salary transition parameters within the amended code. McLagan recommends the incentive opportunity be weighted 50 percent to CalSTRS strategic plan and 50 percent to personal performance linked to the executive competencies outlined in the executive performance evaluation tool. Committee Action: Staff recommends the committee approve the compensation structure recommendations provided by McLagan with an alternative minimum salary range for the CFO and COO effective July 1, 2017 as follows: Base Salary Range Min: $199,703 (10% above current salaries) Mid: $250,000 Max: $296,000 Maximum Incentive Opportunity of 40% weighted as follows: Criteria Weight Performance Measures Long-Range Strategic Planning 50% Chief Executive Officer Evaluation Personal Performance 50% Chief Executive Officer Evaluation 3. General Counsel - Setting base salary and incentive opportunity. The General Counsel s salary was reviewed in September At that time, McLagan s recommendation included two alternatives: Alternative 1: Salary Only Min: $306,000 Mid: $375,000 Max: $444,000 Alternative 2: Salary + 20% Incentive Min: $281,000 Min: $337,000 Mid: $345,000 Mid: $414,000 Max: $409,000 Max: $491,000 McLagan also recommended the incentive opportunity, if any, be weighted 100% to qualitative factors, linked to CalSTRS strategic plan, leadership, and individual goals. COMP 8
4 Compensation Committee Meeting Item 3 Page 4 During the September 2016 meeting, the committee expressed its desire to exclude the General Counsel position from incentive compensation eligibility. The committee also conveyed its apprehension to adopt the salary only total compensation value recommended by McLagan without better understanding the value of benefits in the compensation makeup. In light of the information requested from McLagan, the committee concluded that a decision on the base salary should be moved to the April meeting for inclusion with the total rewards/labor market compensation analysis involving the other statutory positions. There has been no change to competitive market pay for the General Counsel position since the September evaluation. Given that the committee has expressed its desire to exclude the General Counsel from incentive eligibility, but also their concern about the gap from current salary to the salary only option, the Committee may want to consider a blended alternative between the two salary range recommendations as follows: Base Salary Range Min: $281,000 (11% salary transition for the incumbent) Mid: $363,000 Max: $444,000 The General Counsel would be excluded from incentive eligibility under this blended alternative. Committee Action: Staff recommends that the committee approve one of the McLagan compensation recommendations or the above noted blended alternative for the General Counsel position effective July 1, Portfolio Manager Setting Base Salary. To align the Portfolio Manager s compensation with the market median, McLagan recommends a modest increase to the base salary range: Base Salary Range Min: $172,000 Mid: $215,000 (5 % increase to current range) Max: $258,000 Committee Action: Staff recommends that the committee approve McLagan s recommendation for the Portfolio Manager position effective July 1, COMP 9 5. CEO and Investment Management Competitive Market Positioning. McLagan s analysis revealed the following: CalSTRS base salaries are competitive, generally positioned at or above the competitive median. Except for the Portfolio Manager, McLagan is recommending no changes to base salaries.
5 Compensation Committee Meeting Item 3 Page 5 CalSTRS total cash (base salary + annual incentive) is below the competitive median for all positions. In particular, the CEO, CIO, and DCIO. McLagan is recommending for positions that are 10% or more below the market (CEO, CIO, and DCIO) the Committee review incentive opportunities as part of the comprehensive incentive framework review in FY as proposed in today s agenda Item # 5. This labor market study was meant to test the salary ranges for these positions. The findings provide a good roadmap to tackle the long-term incentive discussion which will need considerable board input. Committee Decision Points: - There are no decision points at this time; however incentive opportunities should be included in the comprehensive compensation analysis on the work plan as proposed in today s agenda Item # 5. To further assist the committee in its decisions is a Total Cash Opportunity/Internal Equity Comparison chart (Attachment 2) which shows executive and investment management positions and their respective (and proposed) salary ranges and incentive opportunity. NEXT STEPS Staff will incorporate approved changes into the Administrative Procedures for the Teachers Retirement Board s Compensation Policy Section 700. Adjustments to base salary ranges will result in a change of actual pay for individuals in impacted positions. COMP 10
6 Total Rewards Review Executive and Investment Positions COMP 11
7 Introduction 2 California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) asked McLagan to assess the salary and total cash compensation for nine executive and investment management positions: Investment Positions Executive Positions* Chief Investment Officer Deputy Chief Investment Officer Investment Director Portfolio Manager Director of Inv. Operations Associate Portfolio Manager Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer Chief Financial Officer General Counsel In addition, CalSTRS asked McLagan and Aon Hewitt to provide data on total direct compensation and total reward values including long-term incentives, retirement, and health benefits. This report contains our findings as well as proposed alternative salary and incentive structures for certain positions designed to better align CalSTRS pay positioning with its compensation philosophy. Importantly, CalSTRS pay philosophy is to be aligned with market median total cash compensation (i.e., base salary + annual incentive). While values for long-term incentives and benefits are included in this report, these values were not taken into consideration when preparing the alternatives. * Note the the System Actuary position is excluded from this report as it was reviewed at the June 2016 Board meeting. COMP 12
8 Methodology 3 Data was assembled from CalSTRS board-approved policy comparator groups for investment and executive positions: Investment Positions: leading institutional investors and mid-sized asset managers (e.g., AUM $150B to 350B). Executive positions: a weighted average made up of 67% leading public funds and 33% broad private-sector investment management organizations. The following compensation and benefit components are included: Base salary. Total cash (base salary + annual incentives). Total direct compensation (total cash + long-term incentives such as restricted stock, stock options, mutual fund deferrals, etc.). Total rewards (total direct comp + retirement and health benefits). COMP 13
9 Executive Summary 4 Executive Positions For the reviewed executive positions, CalSTRS pay positioning is as follows: CalSTRS base salaries fall below the competitive 25 th percentile for all executive positions except the CEO, which is positioned near the median. Factoring in maximum incentive, CalSTRS remains positioned below the 25 th percentile, except for the CEO position, which falls between the 25 th percentile and median. Recognizing CalSTRS intends to complete a broader compensation review as part of the work plan, we recommend reviewing the CEO s incentive opportunity at that time. From a total rewards perspective (e.g., factoring in long-term incentives and benefits) CalSTRS is positioned even further behind market. Recommendations are provided further in this report for establishing salary ranges and incentive opportunities for the COO and CFO positions. In addition, recommended adjustments to the General Counsel salary range are also presented. COMP 14
10 Executive Summary 5 Investment Positions As shown on the following pages, CalSTRS Investment Management pay positioning suggests: CalSTRS base salaries are competitive, generally positioned at or above the competitive median. However, we do recommend a modest change to the Portfolio Manager salary range further in this report. CalSTRS maximum cash compensation (base salary + maximum incentive), at midpoint, is below the competitive median for all positions. In particular, the Deputy CIO and CIO are furthest from market. As with the CEO position, we recommend reviewing these incentive ranges as part of the broader compensation review in the work plan. Factoring in long-term incentives and benefits, CalSTRS is positioned well below the competitive median (in many cases, approximating or below the competitive 25 th percentile). This is driven primarily by long-term incentive compensation within the competitive market. A modest change to the Portfolio Manager salary range is presented later in this report. COMP 15
11 Executive Positions COMP 16
12 Executive Management Findings 7 For all positions, CalSTRS base salary + maximum incentive lags the market. To align CalSTRS pay positioning to its compensation philosophy, we recommend CalSTRS take the following steps: Establish a salary range and incentive opportunity for the COO and CFO. Consider whether or not the General Counsel position should be incentive eligible. Increase the base salary range for the General Counsel position using one of the alternatives provided further in this report. Evaluate the incentive opportunity of the CEO position as part of the broader compensation review in the work plan. Market positioning and recommendations are detailed on the following pages. COMP 17
13 Executive Management Base Salary vs. Market 8 $500 Base salary $450 $400 $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 COO CFO General Counsel CEO CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market Max / 75th $182 $267 $182 $269 $252 $281 $475 $479 Mid / Median Min / 25th CalPERS Mid na *CalPERS shown for reference only. COMP 18
14 Executive Management Maximum Cash vs. Market Total Cash 9 $2,000 Base salary + maximum annual incentive $1,800 $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 COO CFO General Counsel CEO CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market Max / 75th $209 $440 $209 $677 $252 $626 $855 $1,872 Mid / Median ,064 Min / 25th CalPERS Mid na *CalPERS shown for reference only. COMP 19
15 Executive Management Total Rewards (including long-term, retirement, and health) 10 The following pages show how CalSTRS total rewards (base salary + annual incentive + retirement and health benefits) compares to the competitive market (e.g., salary + annual incentive + long-term incentives + retirement and health benefits). Retirement values were calculated for each position over a range of years-of-service scenarios. While CalSTRS benefit value (retirement + health) is significant, it represents a relatively small portion of total rewards. CalSTRS positioning below market is largely driven by long-term incentives within the peer group. This analysis does not include any consideration of non-tangible benefits (e.g., public service, etc.). Note that total rewards was not considered in the proposed alternatives contained within this report. Please see appendix for detailed benefits assumptions and methodology. COMP 20
16 Executive Management Total Rewards (detailed example for CEO position) 11 3,250 3,000 CalSTRS compensation philosophy is to be competitive with the median total cash Health Retirement CalSTRS Market 2,750 2,500 2,250 Long-Term Incentives na 2,000 1,750 1,680 1,684 1,692 1,702 1,716 1,500 1,250 1, Cash Bonus Base Salary 0 MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market 1-Year 5-Year 10-year 15-year 20-year COMP 21
17 Executive Management Total Rewards (assumes 20 years of service for highest retirement value) 12 $3,500 Base salary + annual incentive + long-term incentives + retirement + health $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 COO CFO General Counsel CEO CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market Max / 75th $290 $588 $290 $880 $361 $792 $969 $3,145 Mid / Median ,716 Min / 25th COMP 22
18 Executive Management Recommendations 13 COO & CFO To align the COO s and CFO s compensation with the market median, CalSTRS should establish base salaries and incentive opportunities as follows: Base salary ranges: Current Base Salary Max: 182K Mid: 148K Min: 123K Maximum incentive opportunity of 40% such that base salary + maximum incentive would be positioned near the competitive median: Current Base Salary + Max Incentive Max: 209K Mid: 170K Min: 141K Recommended Range Max: 296K Mid: 250K Min: 204K Recommended Salary + Max Incentive Max: 415K Mid: 350K Min: 285K * The incentive for the COO and CFO positions would be weighted 100% to qualitative factors linked to CalSTRS strategic plan, leadership and individual goals - TBD. COMP 23
19 Executive Management Recommendations 14 General Counsel As presented at the September 2016 meeting, two proposed alternatives would align CalSTRS General Counsel compensation with the competitive median. I. Base Salary Only Approach: increase base salary to be better aligned with the competitive base salary + annual incentive: Current Base Salary Max: 252K Mid: 205K Min: 170K Proposed Alternative Salary Max: 444K Mid: 375K Min: 306K II. Base Salary + Incentive: increase base salary and include a 20% incentive opportunity to be aligned with the competitive base salary + annual incentive: Current Salary Max: 252K Mid: 205K Min: 170K Proposed Alternative Salary Max: 409K Mid: 345K Min: 281K Proposed Salary + 20% Max Incentive Max: 491K Mid: 414K Min: 337K * The incentive for the General Counsel position would be weighted 100% to qualitative factors linked to CalSTRS strategic plan, leadership and individual goals - TBD. COMP 24
20 Executive Management Recommendations 15 General Counsel (continued) III. Blended Base Salary: to transition the current base salary to a salary-only approach aligned with competitive pay levels, a third alternative is to adopt the lower salary minimum and the higher salary maximum to create a new range: Current Base Salary Max: 252K Mid: 205K Min: 170K Proposed Alternative Salary Max: 444K Mid: 363K Min: 281K CEO While the base salary for the CEO is market competitive, CalSTRS base salary + maximum incentive falls between the 25 th percentile and median. For this reason, we recommend that CalSTRS review the CEO s incentive opportunity during the broader compensation review part of the work plan. COMP 25
21 Investment Management Positions COMP 26
22 Investment Management Findings 17 CalSTRS base salaries for investment management positions are generally competitive. As indicated earlier, the only recommended change to base salaries is for the Portfolio Manager position. CalSTRS maximum cash compensation (base salary + maximum incentive), at midpoint, is below the competitive median for all positions. In particular, the Deputy CIO, and CIO are furthest from market. We recommend reviewing incentive opportunities for these positions as part of the broader compensation review in the work plan. Factoring in long-term incentives and benefits, CalSTRS is positioned well below the competitive median (in many cases, approximating or below the competitive 25 th percentile). This is driven primarily by long-term incentive compensation within the competitive market. Market positioning and recommendations are detailed on the following pages. COMP 27
23 Investment Management Base Salary vs. Market 18 $600 Base salary $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 Assoc PM Dir of Inv Ops PM Inv Dir Deputy CIO CIO CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market Max / 75th $162 $175 $246 $250 $246 $259 $392 $310 $408 $395 $612 $565 Mid / Median Min / 25th CalPERS Mid 135 na na 510 *CalPERS shown for reference only. COMP 28
24 Investment Management Maximum Cash vs. Market 19 $2,500 Base salary + maximum annual incentive $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 Assoc PM Dir of Inv Ops PM Inv Dir Deputy CIO CIO CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market Max / 75th $227 $260 $369 $405 $431 $510 $686 $825 $734 $1,300 $1,224 $2,250 Mid / Median ,020 1,257 Min / 25th CalPERS Mid 189 na na 893 *CalPERS shown for reference only. COMP 29
25 Investment Management Total Rewards (including long-term, retirement, and health) 20 The following pages show how CalSTRS total rewards (salary + incentive + retirement and health benefits) compares to the competitive market (e.g., salary + annual incentive + long-term incentives + retirement and health benefits). Retirement values were calculated for each position over a range of years-of-service scenarios. While CalSTRS benefit value (retirement + health) is significant, it represents a relatively small portion of total rewards. CalSTRS positioning below market is largely driven by long-term incentives within the peer group. This analysis does not include any consideration of non-tangible benefits (e.g., public service, etc.). Please see appendix for detailed benefits assumptions and methodology. COMP 30
26 Investment Management Total Rewards (detailed example for CIO position) 21 3,250 3,000 CalSTRS compensation philosophy is to be competitive with the median total cash CalSTRS Market Health Retirement 2,750 2,500 2,250 2,263 2,268 2,276 2,287 2,302 Long-Term Incentives na 2,000 1,750 1,500 Cash Bonus 1,250 1,000 1,046 1,068 1,084 1,105 1, Base Salary 0 MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax MinMidMax CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market 1-Year 5-Year 10-year 15-year 20-year COMP 31
27 Investment Management Total Rewards (assumes 20 years of service for highest retirement value) 22 $3,500 Base salary + annual incentive + long-term incentives + retirement + health $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 Assoc PM Dir of Inv Ops PM Inv Dir Deputy CIO CIO CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market CalSTRS Market Max / 75th $304 $405 $476 $556 $476 $705 $800 $1,332 $848 $1,900 $1,338 $3,035 Mid / Median ,394 1,134 2,302 Min / 25th ,049 COMP 32
28 Investment Management Recommendations 23 Portfolio Manager To align the Portfolio Managers compensation with the market median, CalSTRS could modestly increase base salary as follows: Current Base Salary Max: 246K Mid: 205K Min: 164K Proposed Alternative Max: 258K Mid: 215K Min: 172K Deputy CIO and CIO Base salary + maximum incentive lags the market for these two positions. CalSTRS should review the incentive opportunity for the CIO and Deputy CIO as part of the broader compensation review in the work plan. COMP 33
29 Summary of Recommendations 24 As detailed earlier, CalSTRS current pay positioning is below market median for several positions. For positions that are 10% or more below market, our recommendations increase CalSTRS salary ranges and/or and incentive opportunities to be better aligned with its compensation philosophy. Due to the volatile nature of investment management industry pay, we do not believe changes to positions within 10% of market median are needed at this time. However, CalSTRS should continue to monitor its competitive positioning over time for these, and all, positions. CalSTRS Current McLagan Proposed Alternatives Salary Max Salary + Max Bonus Var to Salary Max Salary + Max Bonus Var to Position Min Mid Max Bon Min Mid Max Market Min Mid Max Bon Min Mid Max Market Chief Investment Officer* % 816 1,020 1,224-19% % 816 1,020 1,224-19% Deputy CIO* % % % % Investment Director % % % % Portfolio Manager % % % % Director of Inv. Operations % % % % Associate Portfolio Managers % % % % Chief Executive Officer* % % % % General Counsel % % % General Counsel % % % % General Counsel % % % Chief Operating Officer % % % % Chief Financial Officer % % % % * Salary + Max bonus is significantly below market for the CIO, Deputy CIO, and CEO positions. CalSTRS should review incentive opportunities for these positions as part of the broader compensation review in the work plan. (1)(2)(3) Three alternatives were presented for the General Counsel position, as detailed on page 14 and 15. COMP 34
30 Appendix Comparator Group Details COMP 35
31 Comparator Group Details Investment Positions 26 Leading Institutional Managers Leading Institutional Managers (14) (12/31/15) California Public Employees' Retirement System US Public Fund $289.9 Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Canadian Pension Fund Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec Canadian Pension Fund Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board Canadian Pension Fund Teacher Retirement System Of Texas US Public Fund State of Wisconsin Investment Board US Public Fund 92.0 General Motors Asset Management US Corp. Plan Sponsor 87.9 Georgia Employees Retirement System US Public Fund 79.3 Ontario Municipal Employees' Retirement System Canadian Pension Fund 77.0 State Teachers Retirement System Ohio US Public Fund 70.7 Lockheed Martin Investment Management Company US Corp. Plan Sponsor 70.1 Virginia Retirement Systems US Public Fund 66.2 Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan Canadian Pension Fund 63.9 DuPont Capital Management US Corp. Plan Sponsor 26.9 US Public Fund 6 43% Canadian Pension Fund 5 36% US Corp. Plan Sponsor 3 21% % High Quartile % 88 Median $ % 44 Low Quartile % 26 AUM % Internally Managed # of Inv Staff Private sector asset management organizations of comparable size ($150B to $350B AUM) that are key competitors for CalSTRS staff, includes: Private Sector - 29 Investment Management / Advisory Firms - 8 Insurance Companies - 3 Banks COMP 36
32 Comparator Group Details Executive Positions (67% Leading Public Funds) 27 California Public Employees' Retirement System $289.9 New York State Common Retirement Fund State Board Admin - Florida Teacher Retirement System Of Texas Washington State Investment Board State of Wisconsin Investment Board 92.0 North Carolina Retirement System 86.6 Ohio Public Employees Retirement System 85.9 Georgia Retirement Systems 79.3 New Jersey Division of Investment 71.9 State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio 70.7 State of Michigan Retirement Systems 60.1 PA Public School Employees' Retirement System 50.2 Colorado Public Employees' Retirement Association 39.5 South Dakota Investment Council 10.2 % Internally # of Inv AUM Managed Staff High Quartile $ % 74 Median % 41 Low Quartile % 28 California State Teachers' Retirement System $ % 67 CalSTRS' Rank 2 of of 16 5 of 16 COMP 37
33 Comparator Group Details Executive Positions (33% Broad Private Sector Inv. Mgmt. Orgs.) 28 As indicated below, the private sector peer group includes a broad range of 353 organizations across multiple industry segments. Firms with poor pay practices, as determined by CalSTRS governance staff, were excluded from this peer group. CalSTRS' Private Sector Pay Comparators 12/31/15 AUM (bbs) # of Low High Firms Quartile Median Quartile Investment Management Firms 177 $16.5 $53.0 $155.4 Banks (Investment Management Departments) Insurance Companies (Investment Management Departments) Corporate Plan Sponsors Endowments & Foundations Total 353 $9.2 $31.9 $99.8 COMP 38
34 Appendix Benefits Assumptions and Methodology COMP 39
35 Benefit Assumptions & Methodology 30 Data was analyzed for the following retirement and health benefits: Retirement plans: average of the present value of age benefit accrual for DB and match for DC applicable for each position, service, and pay level. Includes both qualified and nonqualified plans. Active and retiree health: average value of employer provided active health plan during present value of employer provided retiree medical benefits at age 65 divided by years of service at retirement. Key Assumptions Hire Age: 35 Pay Increase: 3.0% Inflation: 2.5% Retirement Age: 65 Medical Trend: 5.0% Discount Rate: 4.5% RP2014 mortality table generationally projected from 2006 using Scale MP-2016 Pre and Post PEPRA determined based on service as of 1/1/2017 Only new hire benefits (not legacy benefits) analyzed for peer group Benefits available prior to age 65, including subsidized early retirement benefits and valuable retiree health benefits, have not been reflected due to the age 65 retirement assumption. This benefit may be quite substantial for CalSTRS, but unlikely to bridge the total rewards gap shown on the following pages. COMP 40
36 Positions Under the CalSTRS Boards' Compensation Setting Authority Total Cash (Salar y + Incentive) Opportunity BASE SALARY POSITION Attachment 2 INCENTIVE OPPORTUNITY MIN MAX MIN MAX CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER $325,000 $475,000 0% 80% CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER $408,000 $612,000 0% 100% DEPUTY CIO $272,000 $408,000 0% 80% INVESTMENT DIRECTOR $262,000 $392,000 0% 75% GENERAL COUNSEL (ALT. 2) $281,000 $409,000 0% 20% GENERAL COUNSEL (ALT. 1) $306,000 $444,000 N/A N/A GENERAL COUNSEL (ALT. 3) $281,000 $444,000 N/A N/A PORTFOLIO MANAGER $172,000 $258,000 0% 75% PORTFOLIO MANAGER $164,000 $246,000 0% 75% CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER* $204,000 $296,000 0% 40% CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER* $204,000 $296,000 0% 40% SYSTEM ACTUARY $212,000 $308,000 0% 20% DIR INVESTMENT OPRNS $164,000 $246,000 0% 50% ASSOC PORTFOLIO MGR $108,000 $162,000 0% 40% GENERAL COUNSEL $170,000 $252,000 N/A N/A CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER* $123,000 $182,000 0% 15% CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER* $123,000 $182,000 0% 15% *Effective these positions are included under the compensation setting authority of the CalSTRS Board. McLagan Recommendations COMP 41 Rev. v
Administrative Procedures for the Teachers Retirement Board s Compensation Policy Section 700
Administrative Procedures for the Teachers Retirement Board s Compensation Policy Section 700 PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to provide the terms, conditions, and plan mechanics related to CalSTRS
More informationCOMPENSATION STUDY: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) Austin, TX LORI MESSER, SENIOR CONSULTANT MAY 24, 2018
COMPENSATION STUDY: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) Austin, TX LORI MESSER, SENIOR CONSULTANT MAY 24, 2018 0 Table of Contents Contents Study Background Survey Methodology Survey
More informationRE: THE IOWA LOTTERY AUTHORITY S KEY PERSONNEL
September 23, 2013 SALARY STUDY REPORT RE: THE IOWA LOTTERY AUTHORITY S KEY PERSONNEL BACKGROUND In November 2012, the Iowa Department of Administrative Services Human Resources Enterprise (DAS-HRE) met
More informationDepartment of State Treasurer Compensation Review and Recommendations February 18, Josh Wilson Jon Mason
Department of State Treasurer Compensation Review and Recommendations February 18, 2015 Josh Wilson Jon Mason Process Phase 1 Planning and Strategy Development Kick off meetings Stakeholder Interviews
More informationDraft LAO executive compensation framework
Draft LAO executive compensation framework Considering: O. Reg. 304/16: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK under Broader Public Sector Executive Compensation Act, 2014, S.O. 2014, c. 13, Sched. 1 February
More informationToronto Hydro Corporation Executive Compensation Assessment October 2012
Toronto Hydro Corporation Executive Compensation Assessment October 2012 Market Review Table of Contents Page Introduction & Methodology 3 Market Data Summary 6 Appendix A Additional Compensation Data
More information2018 TOP POOL EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION & BENEFITS ANALYSIS REDACTED: Data provided to participating pools
2018 TOP POOL EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION & BENEFITS ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction............................. 3 Anticipated retirement of top executives............. 4 Salary findings...........................
More informationCompensation, Retirement, and Benefits Trends Report Findings and Benchmarking
Compensation, Retirement, and Benefits Trends Report Findings and Benchmarking 2016/2017 Edition 1 newportgroup.com For informational use only. Introduction In today's economy, employee benefits remain
More informationTop Performing Companies: $2 - $4 Billion Revenue In Depth Review: CEO & CFO Compensation and Board Compensation
Top Performing Companies: $2 - $4 Billion Revenue In Depth Review: CEO & CFO Compensation and Board Compensation 2008 Overview MullinTBG and Strategic Compensation Group jointly analyzed the compensation
More informationState Retiree Health Care Liabilities: An Update Increased obligations in 2015 mirrored rise in overall health care costs
A brief from Sept 207 State Retiree Health Care Liabilities: An Update Increased obligations in 205 mirrored rise in overall health care costs Overview States paid a total of $20.8 billion in 205 for nonpension
More informationCIO SUMMIT. Building a Performance Driven Investment Culture Motivating Change and Getting the Results You Need. Presented by: June 14, 2018
CIO SUMMIT Building a Performance Driven Investment Culture Motivating Change and Getting the Results You Need June 14, 2018 Presented by: Today s Presenters Brad Kelly Peter Landers Partner Partner brad.kelly@ggainc.com
More informationNorth Carolina Retirement Systems Pension Administration Benchmarking Results. Michael Reid Vice President
North Carolina Retirement Systems Pension Administration Benchmarking Results Michael Reid Vice President How you can use CEM s pension administration benchmarking service: Measure and manage costs. Understand
More informationExhibit 1. Morningstar, State of North Carolina Pension Overview (Nov. 20, 2013).
Exhibit 1 Morningstar, Pension Overview (Nov. 20, 2013). Also available at https://www.nctreasurer.com/ret/documents/morningstarncpensionreport.pdf Morningstar Pension Report Release Date: 20 Nov 2013
More informationTEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD BENEFITS AND SERVICES COMMITTEE
TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD BENEFITS AND SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBJECT: Five-Year Tiered and Single-Year Permissive ITEM NUMBER: 3 Service Credit Purchase Rates CONSENT: ATTACHMENT(S): 1 ACTION: X DATE OF MEETING:
More information2017 Public Pension Funding Study
MILLIMAN WHITE PAPER 207 Public Pension Funding Study Rebecca A. Sielman, FSA Introduction The Milliman Public Pension Funding Study annually explores the funded status of the 00 largest U.S. public pension
More informationThe Iowa Public Employees Retirement System Pension Administration Benchmarking Report FY 2018
The Iowa Public Employees Retirement System Pension Administration Benchmarking Report FY 2018 Paul Martiniello Director, CEM Benchmarking March 22, 2019 Des Moines, Iowa 2019 CEM Benchmarking Inc. How
More informationTEACHERS' RETIREMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING. SUBJECT: SCR 105 Report on System Funding ITEM NUMBER: 6 CONSENT: ATTACHMENT(S): 1
TEACHERS' RETIREMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING SUBJECT: SCR 105 Report on System Funding ITEM NUMBER: 6 CONSENT: ATTACHMENT(S): 1 ACTION: MEETING DATE: February 8, 2013 / 2 hrs. INFORMATION: X PRESENTER: Ed
More informationAbout Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC
About Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC is one of the largest independent executive compensation and corporate governance consulting firms in North America. Meridian
More informationTEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD. REGULAR MEETING Item Number: 7 CONSENT: ATTACHMENT(S): 1. DATE OF MEETING: November 8, 2018 / 60 mins
TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING Item Number: 7 SUBJECT: Review of CalSTRS Funding Levels and Risks CONSENT: ATTACHMENT(S): 1 ACTION: INFORMATION: X DATE OF MEETING: / 60 mins PRESENTER(S): Rick
More informationProposed Plan Changes April 21, Thomas Pfeifle Executive Director
Proposed Plan Changes April 21, 2014 Thomas Pfeifle Executive Director Presentation Outline Plan History and Dynamics Recent History Board Efforts and Impacts Current Status of Plan Future of Plan Actuarial
More information3.0: COMPENSATION FINDINGS
3.0: COMPENSATION FINDINGS This chapter reviews the current salary ranges established by the Department of Management Services (DMS) utilized by the. The salaries and salary ranges of SES and SMS employees
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY KEVIN G. GARDNER VICE PRESIDENT, HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAMS ENTERGY SERVICES INC
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. FOR APPROVAL OF CHANGES IN RATES FOR RETAIL ELECTRIC SERVICE ) ) ) ) DOCKET NO. 13-028 -U DIRECT
More informationTotal State and Local Business Taxes
Q UANTITATIVE E CONOMICS & STATISTICS J ANUARY 2004 Total State and Local Business Taxes A 50-State Study of the Taxes Paid by Business in FY2003 By Robert Cline, William Fox, Tom Neubig and Andrew Phillips
More information2011 Senior Management Compensation Survey
2011 Senior Management Compensation Survey www.rccf.com 221 East 4 th Street, Suite 2400, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (513) 621-9700 Attached are the results of the 2011 River Cities Capital Funds Senior Management
More informationAMERICAN INVESTMENT COUNCIL. Public Pension Study May 2018
AMERICAN INVESTMENT COUNCIL Public Pension Study May 2018 Methodology This study conducted by the American Investment Council examines the private equity investments of 163 U.S. public pension funds. The
More informationInfrastructure and Private Credit AMAFORES / FIAP Conference
Infrastructure and Private Credit AMAFORES / FIAP Conference October 31 2017 Participation in Alternative Assets INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS BYNUMBER OF ALTERNATIVE ASSET CLASSESINVESTED IN None One Two Three
More informationCEM Pension Administration Benchmarking Analysis Investment Benchmarking Service. Iowa Public Employees Retirement System
CEM Pension Administration Benchmarking Analysis Investment Benchmarking Service A benchmarking solution for your DB plan Iowa Public Employees Retirement System 2018 CEM Benchmarking Inc. March 26, 2018
More informationNASRA Issue Brief: Employee Contributions to Public Pension Plans
NASRA Issue Brief: Employee Contributions to Public Pension Plans September 2017 Unlike in the private sector, nearly all employees of state and local government are required to share in the cost of their
More informationGASB 45: Reporting the True Cost of Other Post-Employment Benefits
A RESEARCH SERIES FROM THE OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER Thomas P. DiNapoli State Comptroller DIVISION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT ISSUES IN FOCUS GASB 45:
More informationMinnesota Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement
Minnesota Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement January 31, 2017 Michael de Leon, FCA, ASA, EA, MAAA Judy Stromback, FSA, FCA, EA, MAAA Agenda Role of LCPR s Consulting Actuary Actuarial Valuation
More informationEstimating the Number of People in Poverty for the Program Access Index: The American Community Survey vs. the Current Population Survey.
Background Estimating the Number of People in Poverty for the Program Access Index: The American Community Survey vs. the Current Population Survey August 2006 The Program Access Index (PAI) is one of
More informationTitle: The Role of Retirement Plan Design in Risk Management
MONDAY MAY 22, 2017 4:15-5:30PM Title: The Role of Retirement Plan Design in Risk Management MODERATOR SPEAKERS Casey Srader Budget Manager, City of Plano, TX Leslie Thompson Senior Consultant, Gabriel,
More informationPublic Sector Executive Compensation Reporting Form
Public Sector Executive Compensation Reporting Form British Columbia Lottery Corporation Reporting for 08/09 Statement of Executive Compensation Filed June 22, 2009 Table of Contents Item 1 General Provisions
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE ANNUAL DISCLOSURE MODEL REGULATION
Model Regulation Service 4 th Quarter 2014 Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 1. Authority Purpose Definitions Filing Procedures Contents of Corporate
More informationRECENT PENSION LEGISLATION AND ITS IMPACT ON CALSTRS BENEFIT PROGRAMS 1 of 9
1 of 9 On September 12, 2012, Governor Brown approved Assembly Bill 340 (Furutani), enacted as Chapter 296, Statutes of 2012, an extensive revision to California public pension plans. Given the uniqueness
More informationGuaranteed Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (Residential Mortgage Loans)
Supplement to MBS Prospectus dated June 1, 2016 Guaranteed Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (Residential Mortgage Loans) THE CERTIFICATES AND PAYMENTS OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST ON THE CERTIFICATES ARE
More informationTermination Final Pay Requirements
State Involuntary Termination Voluntary Resignation Vacation Payout Requirement Alabama No specific regulations currently exist. No specific regulations currently exist. if the employer s policy provides
More informationSelected Approved Changes to State Public Pensions to Restore or Preserve Plan Sustainability
Retirement Systems of Alabama Arizona Public Safety Personnel Retirement System Arizona State Retirement System Decreased contribution rates for new employees as follows: general state employees and teachers,
More informationAmerican Dental Association Changing Payment System. Medicare Coverage Addendum
Tax American Dental Association Changing Payment System Medicare Coverage Addendum Contents of Benefit Implementation Strategies 3 Medicare 10 Medicare 15 21 was engaged to perform actuarial services.
More informationSustaining State Retirement Benefits: Recent State Legislation Affecting Public Retirement Plans, Ronald Snell January 2010
Sustaining State Retirement Benefits: Recent State Legislation Affecting Public Retirement Plans, 2005-2009 Ronald Snell January 2010 INTRODUCTION Since 2007, investment losses and the weakness of state
More informationNASRA ISSUE BRIEF: Cost-of-Living Adjustments
NASRA ISSUE BRIEF: Cost-of-Living Adjustments February 2014 Cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) in some form are provided on most state and local government pensions. The purpose of a COLA is to offset
More informationMetrics and Measurements for State Pension Plans. November 17, 2016 Greg Mennis
Metrics and Measurements for State Pension Plans November 17, 2016 Greg Mennis Fiscal Sustainability Metrics Net Amortization Measures whether contributions are sufficient to reduce pension debt if plan
More informationLong-Term Forecasts for Cities and Counties. Robert Leland Senior Advisor, Management Partners
Long-Term Forecasts for Cities and Counties Robert Leland Senior Advisor, Management Partners Revenue Gap Persists Agencies have not recovered from Great Recession revenue loss Large gap between past expectations
More informationInvestment Cost Effectiveness Analysis Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global
Investment Cost Effectiveness Analysis 2015 Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global Table of contents 1 Executive summary 2 Research 3 Peer group and universe Total cost versus benchmark cost 5-6 Benchmark
More informationFlorida Retirement System
Florida Retirement System 2017 FRS Actuarial Assumption Estimating Conference Including Preliminary July 1, 2017 Actuarial Valuation Results Presented by: Matt Larrabee, FSA, EA, MAAA October 5, 2017 This
More informationCOMPENSATION AND BENEFITS
Filed: 00--0 EB-00-00 Exhibit F Schedule Page of 0 0 0 COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this evidence is to present the compensation and benefits framework associated with OPG s regulated
More informationAlex Brown Research Manager
Pension Reform & The Public Plan Contributory Experience Alex Brown Research Manager National Association of State Retirement Administrators NRTA September 29, 2015 Size and scope of public pensions in
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE ANNUAL DISCLOSURE MODEL REGULATION
Table of Contents Model Regulation Service 4 th Quarter 2014 Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 1. Authority Purpose Definitions Filing Procedures Contents of Corporate
More informationUtah Retirement Systems
Utah Retirement Systems Important Updates Concerning the URS Investment Earnings Assumption and Impact on the Net Pension Liability AGA Spring Conference May 9 and 10, 2017 Kim Kellersberger Finance Director
More information10 yrs. The benefit is capped at 80% of FAS. An elected official may. 2% (first 10 yrs.); or 2.25% (second 10 yrs.); or 2.5% over 20 yrs.
Table 3.13 STATE LEGISLATIVE RETIREMENT BENEFITS Alabama... Alaska... Age 60 with 10 yrs. Employee 6.75% 2% (first 10 yrs.); or 2.25% (second 10 yrs.); or 2.5% over 20 yrs. x average salary over 5 highest
More informationRutgers, The State University of New Jersey Debt Policy May 2006 FINAL
Rutgers, The State New Jersey Debt Policy May 2006 FINAL Table of Contents I. Overview... 2 II. Scope and Objectives... 2 III. Oversight... 3 IV. Strategic Debt Allocation...... 4 V. Debt Affordability
More informationSociety of Actuaries Finalizes New Mortality Assumptions
Consulting Retirement Society of Actuaries Finalizes New Mortality Assumptions The Financial and Strategic Implications for Pension Plan Sponsors November 2014 Risk. Reinsurance. Human Resources. Highlights
More informationTax Recommendations and Actions in Other States. Joel Michael House Research Department June 9, 2011
Tax Recommendations and Actions in Other States Joel Michael House Research Department June 9, 2011 Governors FY 2012 Recommendations 12 governors recommend net revenue (tax and fee) increases 12 governors
More informationCheckpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources
Checkpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources Alabama Alaska Announcements Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Source Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act ( FATCA ) Under Chapter 4 of the Code
More information2013 Report on the Funding of Defined Benefit Pension Plans in Ontario Overview and Selected Findings
2013 Report on the Funding of Defined Benefit Pension in Ontario Overview and Selected Findings 2010-2013 Financial Services Commission of Ontario March 2014 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1
More informationGovernment Pension Fund Norway Investment Benchmarking Results For the 5 year period ending December 2011
Government Pension Fund Norway Investment Benchmarking Results For the 5 year period ending December 2011 What gets measured gets managed, so it is critical that you measure and compare the right things:
More informationEconomic Growth Through Employee Ownership. How states can save jobs and address the wealth inequality gap through ESOPs
Economic Growth Through Employee Ownership How states can save jobs and address the wealth inequality gap through ESOPs CONTENTS 1 GROWTH THROUGH ESOPs 2 WHAT IS AN ESOP? 3 STATE POLICIES TO PROMOTE ESOPs
More informationATHENE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities
Rates Effective August 8, 05 ATHE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities State Availability Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas Product Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire California PE New Jersey
More information2018 ABA Commercial Real Estate Survey Report. July 2018
2018 ABA Commercial Real Estate Survey Report July 2018 Table of Contents Acknowledgements......3 Summary of Key Survey Findings.....4 Participant Profile....5 CRE Capital Concentrations.. 8 Market Characteristics.....
More informationBENEFITS VALUATION ANALYSIS Get Your Benefits Package Right Claus Adam, Frankfurt EMEA Benefits Products Manager
BENEFITS VALUATION ANALYSIS Get Your Benefits Package Right 2014 Claus Adam, Frankfurt EMEA Benefits Products Manager Benefit Valuation Analysis (BVA) What is it? When it comes to benefits : Do you know
More informationCommonfund Higher Education Price Index Update
Commonfund Higher Education Price Index 2017 Update Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION: THE HIGHER EDUCATION PRICE INDEX 1 About HEPI 1 The HEPI Tables 2 HIGHER EDUCATION PRICE INDEX ANALYSIS
More informationMotor Vehicle Sales/Use, Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart-2005
The following is a Motor Vehicle Sales/Use Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart which you may find helpful in determining the Sales/Use Tax liability of your customers who either purchase vehicles outside of
More informationState Economic Scorecard
A quarterly ranking of state economic performance February 2014 Oil Boom Leaving its Mark Robert Kavcic, Senior Economist robert.kavcic@bmo.com 416-359-8329 The U.S. economy continues to show signs of
More information2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes
2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes Dear Valued ADP Client, Beginning with your first payroll with checks dated in 2012, you and your employees may notice changes in your paychecks due to updated 2012
More informationIn-depth: Risk Sharing in Public Retirement Plans. Keith Brainard Alex Brown
In-depth: Risk Sharing in Public Retirement Plans Keith Brainard Alex Brown December 2018 Authors Keith Brainard and Alex Brown are researchers at the National Association of State Retirement Administrators
More informationNEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR TEACHERS ASSOCIATION
2 THANK Main Types YOU of Workplace Pension Plans Defined THANK Contribution YOU (DC) Similar to an RRSP Defined Contribution (DC) Employee and employer contributions plus investment earnings accumulate
More informationState Individual Income Tax Rates for Retirement Income as of January 31, 2015 Presented by Timothy Weller
State Individual Income Tax Rates for as of January 31, 2015 Presented by Timothy Weller State Low High Low High Alabama 2.0 5.0 $500 $3,000 Social security, as well as military, civil service, state/local
More informationMODERNIZING KENTUCKY S WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM. Protecting Benefits for Workers While Improving Competitiveness
MODERNIZING KENTUCKY S WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM Protecting Benefits for Workers While Improving Competitiveness FEBRUARY 2018 D E T A D T OU YSTE M ATIO N S S N E P S CO M O R KE R W NO MAJOR CHANGES
More informationCAP 100 Company Research
Industry Report // 2016-2017 CAP 100 Company Research The CAP 100 Company Research consists of 100 companies from 9 industries, selected to provide a broad representation of market practice among large
More informationRESEARCH ON GOVERNMENT PENSIONS IN RELATIONS TO SOCIAL SECURITY COVERAGE
RESEARCH ON GOVERNMENT PENSIONS IN RELATIONS TO SOCIAL SECURITY COVERAGE Kathleen D. Baxter, PhD, CGFM, CPM Administrative Director STAARS Alabama Department of Finance Keren H. Deal, PhD, CPA, CGFM Professor
More informationTo report back on the results of the external review of compensation for elected officials.
STAFF REPORT April 24, 2006 To: From: Subject: Employee and Labour Relations Committee City Manager Compensation Review: Elected Officials Purpose: To report back on the results of the external review
More informationTEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD. REGULAR MEETING Item Number: 7. SUBJECT: Assumptions Related to GASB Statement No. 67 and No. 74 CONSENT: ATTACHMENT(S): 2
TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING Item Number: 7 SUBJECT: Assumptions Related to GASB Statement No. 67 and No. 74 CONSENT: ATTACHMENT(S): 2 ACTION: X INFORMATION: DATE OF MEETING: / 10 mins. PRESENTER(S):
More informationA Legislator s Guide. to Iowa Public Employees Retirement System. Important Information for IPERS Plan Sponsors
A Legislator s Guide to Iowa Public Employees Retirement System A Legislator s Guide The Iowa Legislature created IPERS in 1953, recognizing a need for retirement security for Iowa citizens who dedicate
More informationSTOCKHOLDERS INFORMATION SUPPLEMENT SCHEDULE SIS
Model Regulation Service April 2001 STOCKHOLDERS INFORMATION SUPPLEMENT SCHEDULE SIS Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 1. General Instructions Financial Reporting
More informationEmployer-Funded Individual Health Insurance
Employer-Funded Individual Health Insurance ANNUAL REPORT 2016 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This 2016 Annual Report is intended to provide a detailed, nationwide profile of how employers and employees are using
More informationSTATE REVENUE REPORT SECOND QUARTER, 2017
STATE REVENUE REPORT SECOND QUARTER, 2017 Volatility in Income Tax, Continued Weakness in Sales Tax, Slower Growth in Property Tax Jim Malatras December 2017 Report #109 Lucy Dadayan www.rockinst.org @rockefellerinst
More informationPurpose of a Formal Compensation Plan
Total Compensation: Understanding Plan Elements and Strategy Julia Date Johnson, or subtitle Senior Manager 920.662.2876 ww w.wi Wipfli LLPpfli. com Today s Agenda Purpose of a Formal Compensation Plan
More informationScott G. Miller, City of Beverly Hills Chief Financial Officer / Director Administrative Services
Scott G. Miller, City of Beverly Hills Chief Financial Officer / Director Administrative Services 1 Implement Short, Mid and Long-Term Structural Changes to Reduce Employee Benefit Costs 2 Program 1: Tied
More informationBenchmark Benefits Review. Human Resources
Benchmark Benefits Review Human Resources Purpose of Review To provide an overview of primary UK employee benefits as compared to benchmark institutions Data Sources Benchmark Institution Review Aon Hewitt
More informationThe American Retirement Security Crisis: An introduction. Lauren Damme Next Social Contract Initiative, New America Foundation
The American Retirement Security Crisis: An introduction Lauren Damme Next Social Contract Initiative, New America Foundation The three legs of retirement security are under strain Americans primarily
More informationEmployee Benefits Best Practices. Andrea Cockrell, Administrative Services Manager
Employee Benefits Best Practices Andrea Cockrell, Administrative Services Manager Agenda Competition for Talent = Need for Good Benefits The Good, Bad and Ugly Risk Best Accounting Practices Best Governance
More informationCapitalizing on Municipal Value in High Tax States: California and New York Profiles
Capitalizing on Municipal Value in High Tax States: California and New York Profiles INSIGHTS & PERSPECTIVES From MacKay Municipal Managers ABOUT MacKay Shields specializes in taxable and municipal fixed-income
More informationCLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State
CLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State Estimating the Annual Amounts of Unemployment Insurance Tax Collections From Individual States for Financing Adult Basic Education/ Job Training Programs
More informationThe Future of Public Pensions. Litigation Surrounding Modification Initiatives. Jay Sushelsky, Washington, D.C.
The Future of Public Pensions Litigation Surrounding Modification Initiatives Jay Sushelsky, Washington, D.C. The Future of Municipal Pensions Overview of Presentation: Public Pensions: Why Now? Constitutional
More informationVARIABLE CONTRACT MODEL LAW
Model Regulation Service April 1999 Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 1. Domestic Companies Contract Statement Required License Required Power
More informationA Guide to Tax Treatment for Long-Term Care Insurance
A Guide to Tax Treatment for Long-Term Care Insurance From Mark Baron, CLTC BARON LONG TERM CARE INSURANCE Afford the care you need Have the life you want Phone: (617) 823-8334 Fax: (781) 634-0588 mark@baronltc.com
More informationTRENDS IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS
TRENDS IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS February 1, 2012 Jennifer Lavinbuk Washington DC Principal Pat Kopacz Louisville, KY Principal Agenda Introduction Executive Compensation Current Environment
More informationPNWER NAFTA Modernization Survey
PNWER NAFTA Modernization Survey Survey Overview Viewed Started Completed Completion Rate Drop Outs (After Starting) Average Time to Complete Survey 1564 225 225 100% 0 7 minutes Q1. Where is your organization
More informationKeeping the Pension Plan Healthy Pension Plan Changes in National webinar series January 8, 2014
Keeping the Pension Plan Healthy Pension Plan Changes in 2014 National webinar series January 8, 2014 1 Your presenters Panelists Howard Van Mersbergen Vice President of Employee Benefits Luc Girard (Mercer)
More informationMinnesota Judicial State Court Salaries
1 Minnesota Judicial State Court Salaries Prepared for the Minnesota District Judges Association by Elizabeth Kula Economics and Mathematics St. Catherine University St. Paul, MN 55105 erkula@stkate.edu
More informationState Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply
Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply Nicholas W. Jenny and Donald J. Boyd The Rockefeller Institute Fiscal News: Vol. 1, No. 3 July 26, 2001 According to a report from the Congressional Budget
More informationEvaluation of Virginia s Corporate Income Tax System
Evaluation of Virginia s Corporate Income Tax System National Legislative Program Evaluation Society Taxation Panel September 19, 2011 Study Mandate House Joint Resolution 681 (2009) to study Virginia
More informationIntroduction. The Assessment consists of: Evaluation questions that assess best practices. A rating system to rank your board s current practices.
ESG / Sustainability Governance Assessment: A Roadmap to Build a Sustainable Board By Coro Strandberg President, Strandberg Consulting www.corostrandberg.com November 2017 Introduction This is a tool for
More informationInsights on Single Family Office Executive Compensation
Insights on Single Family Office Executive Compensation Research Provides Peer Group Comparisons of Compensation and Benefits Practices Appropriate and competitive compensation is a key component of recruiting
More informationFHA Manual Underwriting Exceeding 31% / 43% DTI Eligibility Quick Reference
Credit Score/ Compensating Factor(s)* No Compensating Factor One Compensating Factor Two Compensating Factors No Discretionary Debt Maximum DTI 31% / 43% 37% / 47% 40% / 50% 40% / 40% *Acceptable compensating
More informationPennsylvania Association of Public Employee Retirement Systems, Spring Forum
Pennsylvania Association of Public Employee Retirement Systems, Spring Forum A Discussion Regarding Public Pension Plans May 25, 2016 Greg Mennis Director, Public Sector Retirement Systems Project The
More informationThis benchmarking report compares your cost and return performance to CEM's extensive pension database.
This benchmarking report compares your cost and return performance to CEM's extensive pension database. 200 U.S. funds participate with assets totaling $4,086 billion. Participating Assets ($) 91 Canadian
More informationA d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n INSURANCE COVERAGE AND CLAIMS INSTITUTE APRIL 3 5, 2019 CHICAGO, IL Delaware Georgia Louisiana Mississippi New Hampshire North Carolina (hours ethics
More informationOut-of-state collectors may be able to obtain limited license or may bypass license requirement. Call collection agency administrator.
The following Summary is intended as a quick reference to the subjects covered. It does not reflect Federal Statutes, and it may not reflect amendments to the laws of all states. This chart should not
More information"The Payroll Experts" 265 Route 46, Suite 206, Totowa, NJ 07512 TELEPHONE: 973-785-3100 FAX: 973-785-2453 973-785-0375 973-785-0560 www.mediadataservices.com 2018 YEAR END INFORMATION & 2019 PAYROLL TAX
More information