Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Agenda Monday, November 13, :30 pm

Transcription

1 Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Agenda Monday, November 13, :30 pm Monterey County Government Center Board Chambers 168 West Alisal Street, Salinas, CA ITEM AGENCY I. CALL TO ORDER Probation A. Roll Call B. Additions or Corrections to Agenda II. PUBLIC COMMENT Pursuant to the Brown Act, each public agency must provide the public with an opportunity to speak on any matter within the subject matter of the jurisdiction of the agency and which is not on the agency's agenda for that meeting. Comments are limited to no more than 3 minutes per speaker. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approve the Meeting Minutes of August 14, 2017 Attachment: Meeting Minutes August 14, 2017 (Action Item) B. Receive Statistical Data Report Attachment: Monterey County CCP Quarterly Statistical Reports: July 1, September 30, 2017 (No Action) IV. SCHEDULED MATTERS A. Receive quarterly fiscal update on AB 109 Funding and Budget Probation Attachment: Staff Report (No Action) B. Approve additional Budget Augmentation Request by Sheriff s Office Sheriff for FY Attachment: Staff Report (Action Item) C. Approve the FY Community Corrections Partnership Probation (CCP) survey due to the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) by December 15, 2017 Attachment: FY BSCC Survey (Action Item)

2 D. Approve the CCP meeting schedule for 2018 Probation Attachment: CCP Meeting Schedule 2018 (Action Item) V. ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT: The next CCP meeting will be held on December 11, 2017 at 3:30 pm at the Monterey County Government Center Board Chambers, 168 West Alisal Street, Salinas, CA Brown Act information: If requested, the agenda shall be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC Sec ), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. A person with a disability who requires a special modification or accommodation in order to participate in the public meeting should contact the Monterey County Probation Department at (831) as soon as possible, and at a minimum 24 hours in advance of any meeting.

3 Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Action Minutes Monday, August 14, :30 p.m. III. A Monterey County Government Center Board Chambers 168 W. Alisal St. Salinas, CA I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Marcia Parsons at 3:31 p.m. A. Roll Call Staff: Anne Brereton, County Counsel CCP Members Present: Marcia Parsons (Chair), Berkley Brannon (Representing Dean Flippo), Ana Galvez (Representing Pamela Patterson), Manuel Gonzalez, Yvette Irving (Representing Nancy Kotowski), Robert Masterson, Robin McCrae, Amie Miller, John Mineau (Representing Stephen Bernal), Elliott Robinson, Chris Ruhl (Representing The Honorable Mark E. Hood), Korey Woo (Representing Chris Donnely). CCP Members Absent: Susan Chapman. B. Additions or Corrections to Agenda There were no additions or corrections. II. Public Comment There were no public comments. III. Consent Calendar A. Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of February 13, 2017 and the Special Meeting Minutes of February 23, 2017 B. Receive Statistical Data Report A motion was made by Berkley Brannon, seconded by Robert Masterson, to approve the Consent Calendar. Vote: Passed 6:0 (Absent: Susan Chapman) IV. Scheduled Matters A. Receive a fiscal update on AB 109 Funding and Budget; Receive an update by the Ad-Hoc Committee on Public Safety Realignment (AB109) Fund Balance Finance Manager Dawn Soza provided an update on actual and projected revenues as of August 3 rd, and a summary of the Ad-Hoc Committee activities and its consensus, as a priority, to ensure the sustainability of the current programs and level of services. Board Comments: John Mineau inquired about future growth projections. Elliott Robinson suggested monitoring realignment growth to ensure sustaining programs. Public Comment: There were no public comments. 1

4 Announcements: The next regular CCP meeting will be held on November 13, 2017 at 3:30 p.m. at the Board of Supervisors Chambers. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 3:41 p.m. Respectfully submitted by Trisha Hidalgo, Senior Secretary Monterey County Probation Department 2

5 Monterey County Community Corrections Partnership Quarterly Report: July 1, 2017 September 30, 2017 Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) active cases each month: III. B 400 Active PRCS Cases Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 The active Mandatory Supervision caseload each month: Active Mandatory Supervision Cases Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 In the last quarter 25% of all 1170(h) local prison sentences included Mandatory Supervision. When inmates are released with Mandatory Supervision, they have an opportunity to participate in all AB109 related rehabilitative services as well as receiving the additional support and supervision provided by their Probation Officer. Ratio of Mandatory Supervision Sentences to 1170(h) Straight Local Prison Sentences 1170(h) Local Prison Sentences 75% *Percentage based on individuals Mandatory Supervision Sentences 25% 1 1

6 AB109 Demographic Data All data reported represents 551 people who had an active Mandatory Supervision or Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) case during the quarter. AB109 Geographic Residency AB109 Case Type PRCS 78% Salinas 44% Mandatory Supervision 22% 0% 50% 100%. Other* 26% South County 10% Monterey Pennisula 15% North County 5% 7% AB109 Age Range 39% 30% 18% 5% 1% AB109 Race/Ethnicity AB109 Gender Other 2% Asian 2% Female 9% Black White 11% 23% Male 91% Hispanic 62% AB109 Levels of Risk and Supervision Moderate 36% High 42% Very High 9% Low 13% Risk Assessment: Probation utilizes the ORAS (Ohio Risk Assessment System) to calculate an individual s risk to re-offend. Effective probation supervision utilizing evidence based practices indicate that those with a score of moderate to high are most likely to benefit from rehabilitative services. Supervision correlates with risk; those that are at a higher risk to reoffend are monitored more closely. 22

7 Monterey County Jail Data Average Daily Jail Population Per Month Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 *Numbers represent the average daily population per month. Does not include those transfered to another facility 1000 Sentenced vs Non-Sentenced Inmates Gender of Inmates % 37% 38% (306) (334) (343) 66% 63% 62% Male 87% Female 13% 200 (582) (566) (551) 0 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Non-Sentenced Inmates Sentenced Inmates Note: This is not a reflection of the number of individuals eligible for pretrial release. The number of Non-Sentenced inmates reflects everyone in custody without a release date, including parole and probation violators. Jail Population Jul Aug Sep Inmates transported to other facilities Inmates being housed in another facility at the end of the month Number of 1170(h) Inmates in custody at the end of the month (This count may also include Parole, Probation, PRCS and Mandatory Supervision) Number of offenders sentenced to 1170(h) Local Prison Sentence (This count may also include Parole, Probation, PRCS and Mandatory Supervision) Calculation based on quarterly average of ADP As of 9/30/2017, 1170(h) sentenced inmates represent 20% of the total ADP and 52% of the total sentenced population

8 Probation and Jail Alternatives to Custody Jul 2017 Aug 2017 Sep 2017 Non-Sentenced Inmates Released Total Number of Inmates Released on their Own Recognizance The count provided represents inmates who qualified to be released on their own recognizance after booking pursuant to the Jail Own Recognizance (O.R.) Policy, Superior Court of California, County of Monterey Criminal Bail Schedule 2016, Appendix C. Pre-Trial Supervision Releases This program supervises defendants in the community while they await the outcome of their charge(s). These defendants were formally authorized by the Court to be released onto pre-trial supervision Work Alternative Program: New Bookings Per Month This count represents the number of people who are booked into the Work Alternative Program instead of serving time in jail custody. They are booked and enrolled into the program and given a date in the future to appear for their work assignment Supervised Home Confinement This count represents sentenced people who applied and were accepted into the Supervised Home Confinement Program in lieu of serving time in jail. Electronic monitoring is utilized to monitor their compliance with rules of the program Residential Substance Abuse Placement This count represents people who were approved to participate in a residential substance abuse treatment program in lieu of serving time in jail or for a portion of their custody time

9 IV. A M E M O R A N D U M COUNTY OF MONTEREY PROBATION DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION TO: FROM: Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Members Probation Staff November 8, 2017 MEETING: November 13, 2017 SUBJECT: Item # IV. A Receive the quarterly fiscal update on AB 109 Funding and Budget The PSR Summary of Total Funding and Actual Expenditures Updated November 2, 2017 provides the most up-to-date fiscal information, including the actual PSR Year-End Fund Balance, inclusive of the Annual Reserve, for FY Since the last report of August 3 rd, 2017, this update illustrates significant changes in the areas of: 1. Fund Balance FY (actual) and FY (projected) 2. Revenue projections for FY Revenue projections in following fiscal years 1. Fund Balance FY 16-17: During the budget process, the CCP was informed that, as the projected budget for FY was not yet realigned to actual expenditures, the allocated funding would not be fully spent, and therefore it would increase the original projections for Year End Fund Balance. Actual expenditures of $9,784,010 are detailed on Attachment FY CCP Approved Budget with FY Actual Expenditures. As they were lower than expected and lower than the budgeted amount of $13,064,817, the actual Year End Fund Balance increased to $8,057,173. By adding the Reserve of $1,865,622, the Total Fund Balance amounts to $9,922,795. FY 17-18: The Total Fund Balance at fiscal year-end is currently projected at $9,822,736, of which $2,000,462 is allocated to Annual Reserve. The Annual Reserve is defined by the Reserve Policy adopted by the CCP on November 29, 2016 as a minimum of 15% of the projected annual operating revenue for the current year. The remaining $7,822,274 Year End Fund Balance is projected to support the yearly cost increases to maintain the current level of services beyond FY Revenue FY Since last CCP meeting in August, revenues projections for FY have increased by a total of $965,796, for a total annual funding of $13,336,414, and specifically: Main Allocation (estimate) = + $550,795 Growth Allocation (actual, from prior FY) = + $415,001

10 Beginning FY 17-18, it is anticipated that the more efficient reallocation of funding, increased cost pressures, the augmentation of staffing and infrastructure resources, and the addition of new programs such as the Early Resolution Court, will closely realign budget projections to actual spending, and provide a more realistic fiscal picture for future forecasting. 3. Revenue Projections in following fiscal years Starting from FY 18-19, revenue projections have been updated and increased to reflect a rolling base formula, where the amount is derived by the prior year main (base) allocation plus the growth revenues collected in the prior year. The projections are based on the Legislative Analyst s Office (LAO) Long-Term Forecast of Sales and Use Tax Revenues, which is the major funding source for Public Safety Realignment. These latest projections significantly lessen the Fund Balance erosion through time. The revised fiscal picture would allow for allocation of additional funding to time-sensitive needs, as identified by the CCP and/ or recommended by the Subject Matter Expert Departments. Attachments: PSR Summary of Total Funding and Actual Expenditures Updated November 2, 2017 FY CCP Approved Budget with FY Actual Expenditures Fiscal update on AB 109 Funding, Budget and Fund Balance Page 2 of 2

11 IV. A Public Safety Realignment Actual and Projected Expenditures, Funding and Reserve July 2015 through June 30, 2021 Summary of Total Funding and Annual Expenditures - Updated November 2, 2017 In FY15-16 the Base Allocation % set for Counties & Growth Formula updated FY17-18 is the first year of realigned and "actual" expenditures. This factor, along with the new formalized Base Alloc % for revenue supports a more refined and realistic forecast for FY18 and beyond. Factors that affect forecast: State Sales Tax and VLF collection, County department savings (unspent budget), unplanned appropriation of Fund Balance, unstable Growth allocation (filled only if Sales Tax projection is met and formula in place does not lend itself to great increases for Monterey County). Current Year ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 Main Allocation (Base)* 11,159,775 11,704,760 12,505,297 13,186,414 13,463,329 13,746,059 Planning Grant ** 150, , , , , ,000 Growth Allocation *** 844, , , , , ,667 Total Annual Funding 12,154,307 12,437,477 13,336,414 13,613,329 13,896,059 14,184,726 Fund Balance/Reserve 5,218,053 7,269,328 9,922,795 9,822,736 9,462,133 8,825,303 Total Funding 17,372,360 19,706,805 23,259,209 23,436,065 23,358,192 23,010,029 Total Budget 12,855,898 13,064,817 13,436,473 13,973,932 14,532,889 15,114,205 Annual Expenditures**** 10,103,032 9,784,010 13,436,473 13,973,932 14,532,889 15,114,205 Year End Fund Balance (less Annual Reserve) 7,269,328 8,057,173 7,822,274 7,420,134 6,740,894 5,768,115 Annual Reserve (resides in Fund Balance) 0 1,865,622 2,000,462 2,041,999 2,084,409 2,127,709 Total Fund Balance: 7,269,328 9,922,795 9,822,736 9,462,133 8,825,303 7,895,824 Notes: *Main Allocation (Base) for FY is based on the published Base and Growth table provided on September 13, 2017 by California State Association of Counties Base projections from FY18-19 and on assume State sales tax revenues meet base allocation requirements. Each year base allocation projection at State level is derived from the prior years base allocation plus growth allocation. **Planning Grant assumes continuation of $150K Planning grant, approved yearly, and subject to submission of annual CCP survey to BSCC ***Effective FY 16-17, Growth Allocation reflects a 10% reduction for the Local Innovation Subaccount -Growth estimates are generated, and actual funds received, in arrears, after the end of the related fiscal year -Growth allocation is forecasted at 2.1% per year. The Governor's FY Final Budget forecasts a 2.1% average year over year growth of Sales & Use Tax funding through FY20-21 which is the main revenue stream for the Public Safety Realignment program. ****1. Annual Expenditures projections for FY18-19 and on, are based on maintaining current level of services and inlcude a 4% COLA to cover cost escalators

12 IV. B M E M O R A N D U M MONTEREY COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE TO: FROM: Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Members Sheriff Staff November 8, 2017 MEETING: November 13, 2017 SUBJECT: Item IV. B Approve additional Budget Augmentation Request by Sheriff s Office for FY The approved AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Budget for Fiscal Year totals $13,436,473. The Sheriff s Office is recommending a one-time augmentation of $1,081,378, for a revised budget of $14,517,851 during FY as a short-term solution to address increased costs for services to inmates, and specifically: A. Increase of $631,378 in the contract with California Forensic Medical Group (CFMG) to provide inmate medical care. These higher costs are a result of more stringent accreditation and quality assurance requirements, and higher standards for medical, mental health and dental services to county inmates. B. Contribution of $450,000 as estimate of costs paid directly to medical service providers as a result of contractual changes in the new CFMG contract, and HIV costs. Currently, CFMG is responsible for all hospital inpatient care costs above $15,000 per episode per inmate. Under the terms of the new contract with CFMG, the County is directly responsible for these costs to the providing hospitals and would become the primary payer, and thus be eligible to claim federal reimbursement under the Medi-Cal Inmate Eligibility Program (MCIEP). The Sheriff s Office is also collaborating with other County Departments (Department of Social Services, Health, Natividad Medical Center, and Probation) on a long-term solution to increase federal financial participation (FFP) through the Medi-Cal Inmate Eligibility Program (MCIEP). MCIEP allows for the reimbursement of 50% of the cost of inpatient hospital services to Medi- Cal eligible inmates provided outside the correctional facility grounds. The California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) has officially determined April 1, 2017 as effective date for services, where providers may submit Medi-Cal Inmate Program (MCIP) claims to DHCS consistent with standard fee-for-service Medi-Cal billing for participating counties only. The County of Monterey has executed a Medi-Cal County Inmate Program agreement with the State of California for participation in the program.

13 MCIP is voluntary, and counties have the option to participate in this program by entering into an agreement with the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS). Per legislation, there is to be no General Fund (GF) impact under MCIP. The purpose of the MCIP agreement is to establish the amounts needed to satisfy each county s responsibility to reimburse DHCS for the nonfederal share of MCIP service costs incurred by DHCS. If a County does not participate in MCIP or does not abide by the terms of this Agreement, the County remains responsible for arranging and paying for medical care for its inmates. While this strategy will require additional resources (through dedicated professional staff or contracted services) to validate eligibility and submit claims, it is anticipated that it would increase the current eligibility success of 28% quite significantly and mitigate the impact of higher medical inmate costs to the County. The table below shows potential cost recovery and new Medi-Cal revenue based on prior year data. Total Billable from NMC $6,373,265 Payable based on CPE (.23 / per dollar) $1,465,851 50% recoverable under MCIP $732,925 28% eligibility rate (based on current success) $205,219 Although the current range of potential Medi-Cal repayment shown could increase up to the maximum of $732,925, it is impossible to predict an actual number. These numbers are based upon hospital usage, eligibility for Medi-Cal, and inmate willingness to enroll. This recommendation will be also presented next to the County Budget Committee, and then to the Board of Supervisors for final approval. Attachment: PSR Summary of Total Funding and Actual Expenditures 11/02/17 with Sheriff s Augmentation Reference m= &utm_campaign=medi-cal%20newsflash&utm_content=25427_rev1 Sheriff Augmentation Request FY Page 2 of 2

14 IV. B Public Safety Realignment Actual and Projected Expenditures, Funding and Reserve July 2015 through June 30, 2021 UPDATED TO REFLECT Sheriff's Office ONE-TIME BUDGET AUGMENTATION REQUEST ON November 13, 2017 Summary of Total Funding and Annual Expenditures In FY15-16 the Base Allocation % set for Counties & Growth Formula updated FY17-18 is the first year of realigned and "actual" expenditures. This factor, along with the new formalized Base Alloc % for revenue supports a more refined and realistic forecast for FY18 and beyond. Factors that affect forecast: State Sales Tax and VLF collection, County department savings (unspent budget), unplanned appropriation of Fund Balance, unstable Growth allocation (filled only if Sales Tax projection is met and formula in place does not lend itself to great increases for Monterey County). Current Year ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 Main Allocation (Base)* 11,159,775 11,704,760 12,505,297 13,186,414 13,463,329 13,746,059 Planning Grant ** 150, , , , , ,000 Growth Allocation *** 844, , , , , ,667 Total Annual Funding 12,154,307 12,437,477 13,336,414 13,613,329 13,896,059 14,184,726 Fund Balance/Reserve 5,218,053 7,269,328 9,922,795 8,741,358 8,380,755 7,743,925 Total Funding 17,372,360 19,706,805 23,259,209 22,354,687 22,276,814 21,928,651 Total Budget: 12,855,898 13,064,817 13,436,473 12,849,299 13,363,271 13,897,802 11/13/17 Sheriff's Office Augmentation 1,081,378 Annual Expenditures**** 10,103,032 9,784,010 14,517,851 13,973,932 14,532,889 15,114,205 Year End Fund Balance (less Annual Reserve) 7,269,328 8,057,173 7,822,274 6,338,756 5,659,516 4,686,737 Annual Reserve (resides in Fund Balance) 0 1,865,622 2,000,462 2,041,999 2,084,409 2,127,709 Less: Annual Reserve Requests 0 0 (1,081,378) Net Annual Reserve Balance: 0 1,865, ,084 2,041,999 2,084,409 2,127,709 Total Fund Balance: 7,269,328 9,922,795 8,741,358 8,380,755 7,743,925 6,814,446 Notes: *Main Allocation (Base) for FY is based on the published Base and Growth table provided on September 13, 2017 by California State Association of Counties Base projections from FY18-19 and on assume State sales tax revenues meet base allocation requirements. Each year base allocation projection at State level is derived from the prior years base allocation plus growth allocation. **Planning Grant assumes continuation of $150K Planning grant, approved yearly, and subject to submission of annual CCP survey to BSCC ***Effective FY 16-17, Growth Allocation reflects a 10% reduction for the Local Innovation Subaccount -Growth estimates are generated, and actual funds received, in arrears, after the end of the related fiscal year -Growth allocation is forecasted at 2.1% per year. The Governor's FY Final Budget forecasts a 2.1% average year over year growth of Sales & Use Tax funding through FY20-21 which is the main revenue stream for the Public Safety Realignment program. ****1. Annual Expenditures projections for FY18-19 and on, are based on maintaining current level of services and inlcude a 4% COLA to cover cost escalators 2. The Annual Expenditures projection for FY includes the Sheriff's one time augmentation request of $1,081,378 at the November 13, 2017 CCP meeting

15 IV. C FY Community Corrections Partnership Survey This survey is designed to help Californians understand your efforts, goals, and successes in implementing Public Safety Realignment. The information you share will be used as the basis of the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) annual report to the Governor and Legislature on the implementation of Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Plans as required by section (11) of subdivision (b) of Section 6027 of the Penal Code. Your responses help to illustrate how counties are allocating and using funds to reduce recidivism while keeping communities safe. We hope you will also consider answering a few optional questions to show how your county is responding to the unique needs of local offenders and what, if any, challenges have arisen and changes have resulted from those responses. Survey This survey was designed by the BSCC in consultation with the Department of Finance to assist counties with reporting requirements. Counties completing the required portions of the survey will have met the report requirement. Counties that complete the survey are compensated. The Budget Act of 2017 (AB 96, Chapter 23) appropriates $7,900,000 to counties as follows: Funding Counties are eligible to receive funding if they submit a report to the Board of State and Community Corrections by December 15, 2017, that provides information about the actual implementation of the Community Corrections Partnership plan accepted by the County Board of Supervisors pursuant to Section of the Penal Code. The report shall include, but not be limited to, progress in achieving outcome measures as identified in the plan or otherwise available. Additionally, the report shall include plans for the allocation of funds, including future outcome measures, programs and services, and funding priorities as identified in the plan accepted by the County Board of Supervisors. Funds will be distributed by January 31, 2018 to counties that comply with all survey requirements as follows: (1) $100,000 to each county with a population of 0 to 200,000, inclusive, (2) $150,000 to each county with a population of 200,001 to 749,999, inclusive, and (3) $200,000 to each county with a population of 750,000 and above. Allocations will be determined based on the most recent county population data published by the Department of Finance. Survey Distribution This survey has been distributed electronically to each Chief Probation Officer as CCP Chair. Each CCP Chair is encouraged to share the survey with CCP members prior to

16 completion and submission. Responses should represent the collective views of the CCP and not a single agency or individual. Submission Instructions To make the survey more user friendly, the BSCC is using both Microsoft Word and Excel for a complete submittal package. The survey consists of two (2) parts and five (5) sections: Part A- to be completed in Microsoft Word Section 1: CCP Membership; Section 2: Your Goals, s and s; and Section 3: Optional Questions. Part B- to be completed in Microsoft Excel Section 4: FY Public Safety Realignment Funding; and Section 5: FY Public Safety Realignment Funding. Respondents may use spell and grammar checks for their narrative responses (Part A, Sections 1, 2, and 3) and Excel s auto-sum features when completing the budgetary questions (Part B, Sections 4 and 5). If you choose not to answer an optional question, please respond Decline to Respond. To produce a more comprehensive report on the implementation of realignment, we are asking for photos and quotes from program participants, if available. You do not need to provide identifying information. Please attach photos of programs in action along with a few quotes. These may be published in the 2011 Public Safety Realignment Act: Sixth Annual Report on the Implementation of Community Corrections Partnership Plans. Please ensure any individual(s) in the photos have given their consent for use/publication. To submit the CCP Survey package, as well as providing any optional photos and/or quotes, all attachments in a single to: Helene Zentner, BSCC Field Representative at: Helene.Zentner@bscc.ca.gov For questions, also contact at: Due Date A single completed survey package (Parts A and B) must be submitted electronically to the BSCC by Friday, December 15, The CCP is encouraged to collaborate on responses and the CCP Chair should submit the survey. Only one submission by a county will be accepted. If you experience any difficulty completing this survey or need technical assistance, please contact: Brian Wise, BSCC Associate Governmental Program Analyst or Brian.Wise@bscc.ca.gov Thank you.

17 FY Community Corrections Partnership Survey PART A SECTION 1: CCP Membership Section 1 asks questions related to the CCP composition and meeting frequency. There are five (5) questions in this section. 1. County Name: 2. Penal Code Section 1230 identifies the membership of the CCP. Provide the name of each individual fulfilling a membership role as of October 1, 2017 in the spaces to the right of each membership role. If a membership role is not filled, respond by indicating vacant. Chief Probation Officer Marcia Parsons Presiding Judge of the Superior Court or Chris Ruhl designee County Supervisor or Chief Administrative Manuel Gonzalez Officer or a designee of the Board of Supervisors District Attorney Dean Flippo Public Defender Susan Chapman Sheriff Stephen Bernal Chief of Police Robert Masterson Head of the County Department of Social Elliott Robinson Services Head of the County Department of Mental Health Elsa Jimenez Head of the County Department of Employment Chris Donnelly Head of the County Alcohol and Substance Amie Miller Abuse Programs Head of the County Office of Education Nancy Kotowski A representative from a community-based Robin McCrae organization with experience in successfully providing rehabilitative services to persons who have been convicted of a criminal offense An individual who represents the interests of Pamela Patterson victims 3. How often does the CCP meet? Use an X to check the box to the left of the list. X X Bi-weekly (every other week) Monthly Bi-monthly (every other month) Quarterly Semi-Annually Annually Special meetings as needed

18 4. How often does the Executive Committee of the CCP meet? Use an X to check the box to the left of the list. X X Bi-weekly(every other week) Monthly Bi-monthly(every other month) Quarterly Semi-Annually Annually Special meetings as needed 5. Does the CCP have subcommittees or working groups? Use an X to check the box to the left of the list. X Yes No If "Yes," list the subcommittees and/or working groups and the purpose. SECTION 2: Your Goals, s and s Section 2 asks questions related to your goals, objectives, and outcome measures. To view your responses provided in the survey, click here. For the purpose of this survey: Goals are defined as broad statements the CCP intends to accomplish. s support identified goals and are defined by statements of specific, measureable aims of the goal. measures consist of the actual measurement of stated goals and objectives. Example: Goal Progress toward stated goal Increase substance use disorder treatment to offenders in ABC County 40% of participants will complete substance use disorder treatment 100% of participants will receive screening for substance use disorder treatment Number of participants enrolled in substance use disorder treatment Number of participants completing substance use disorder treatment Between January 2017 and October 2017, 70% of participants in substance use disorder treatment reported a decrease in the urge to use drugs. This is a 10% increase from the same period last year. 6. Describe a goal, one or more objectives, and outcome measures from FY If the CCP kept the same goal, objective and outcome measure from a prior fiscal year for FY , provide that information. If no goal, objective, or outcome measure was identified, respond by indicating Not Applicable."

19 Goal Progress toward stated goal Continue to enhance public safety by expanding housing resources Create more opportunities for securing affordable housing for high risk offenders Increase the number of potential housing opportunities/landlords willing to provide housing by 50% The database had 33 potential housing opportunities in the last report (15-16 FY). The goal of a 25% increase was surpassed to 58%, an increase to 52 potential housing opportunities. For this report (16-17 FY) there was an increase of 4% from 52 to 54 potential housing opportunities, which is a 64% overall increase. The use of this housing program has resulted in an increase in supervision success. 7. Describe a goal, one or more objectives, and outcome measures from FY If the CCP kept the same goal, objective, and outcome measure from a prior fiscal year for FY , provide that information. If no goal, objective, or outcome measure was identified, respond by indicating Not Applicable." Goal Progress toward stated goal Continue to enhance public safety by increasing timely access to services by expanding substance use provider contracts Work towards implementing a new substance use waiver and service delivery system Begin new RFP process in the next 6 months Completed. The Health Department, Behavioral Health Bureau, is moving forward with a new contract with the State. This will enhance current contractors, eliminate the need for a separate RFP and allow for an increase in local capacity to provide this service. 8. Describe a goal, one or more objectives, and outcome measures from FY If the CCP kept the same goal, objective, and outcome measure from a prior fiscal year for FY , provide that information. If no goal, objective, or outcome measure was identified, respond by indicating Not Applicable." Goal Increase our understanding of the clients we serve to better meet their needs in service delivery

20 Progress toward stated goal Create and provide a satisfaction survey to clients who complete an AB109 funded program Distribute a satisfaction survey to at least 70% of clients who complete an AB109 funded treatment or assistance program Receive at least 50% of the surveys distributed back from clients In Progress. We created an 8 question, web-based survey and implemented a procedure for encouraging in-office participation utilizing an IPad. We began on October 1, Will the CCP use the same goals, objectives, and outcome measures identified above in FY ? Use an X to check the box to the left of the list. X Yes. For goal listed in number 8 only. No. The CCP will add and/or modify goals, objectives, and outcome measures (continue with section 3) 10. Describe a goal, one or more objectives, and outcome measures for FY Goal Progress toward stated goal Increase and expand the probation officers understanding and use of evidence based practices by implementing Effective Practices In Community Supervision (EPICS) 80% of probation officers supervising high risk adult offenders will receive training in the EPICS model # of probation officers enrolled in training Secure the EPICS training through the University of Cincinnati within the next 6 months 11. Describe a goal, one or more objectives, and outcome measures for FY Goal

21 Progress toward stated goal 12. Describe a goal, one or more objectives and outcome measures for FY Goal Progress toward stated goal SECTION 3: Optional Questions Section 3 asks optional questions about evaluation, data collection, programs and services, training and technical assistance needs, and local best practices. There are 10 questions in this section. Responses will be used by the BSCC and its justice-system partners to better understand the needs of counties. If you choose not to answer an optional question, please respond Decline to Respond. 13. Describe the process the CCP uses to determine potential programs and/or services for local implementation using Realignment funds? Offender program and service needs are driven by identified risks and needs assessments conducted. A survey recently implemented to solicit input from offenders may result in new or increased services in the future. Other services, such as victim services, are identified through external knowledge. 14. Does the county evaluate the effectiveness (as defined locally) of programs and/or services funded with its Public Safety Realignment allocation? Use an X to check the box to the left of the list. X Yes No If yes, how? We are currently using a software that allows us to track service delivery. We have a future goal of modifying our current case management system to allow access to service providers to integrate their information with our case/offender information. We

22 are tracking the outcomes of each participant and program, but we are not yet able to tie that to offender outcomes for rehabilitation or recidivism. 15. Does the county consider evaluation results when funding programs and/or services? Use an X to check the box to the left of the list. X Yes No If yes, how? 16. Does the county use BSCC definitions (average daily population, conviction, length of stay, recidivism, and/or treatment program completion rates) when collecting data? Use an X to check the yes or no box to the left of the list, as applicable. Yes X X X X No X Average daily population Conviction Length of stay Recidivism Treatment program completion rates 17. What percentage of the Public Safety Realignment allocation is used for evidencebased programming (as defined locally)? Use an X to check the box to the left of the list. Less than 20% 21% 40% 41% 60% X 61% 80% 81% or higher 18. We would like to better understand your county's capacity to offer mental health, substance use disorder, behavioral health treatment programs, and/or other services? What type and level of services are now available? 1. Short term (30 days) re-entry program on-site at the probation department 2. Behavioral Health services; assessment, on-site psychiatric services, psychotropic medication, outpatient and inpatient substance abuse programs, outpatient and inpatient mental health programs, supportive services, methadone, medication assisted treatment (MAT), case management 3. Day Reporting Center Services 4. Emergency housing, transitional housing, case management and referral services, financial help in obtaining housing (rent, deposit) 5. On-site monthly meeting for clients to access information and services from service providers 6. Employment services; one county employment service agency and two private employment service agencies; employment workshops, job training, job readiness, on the job training, subsidized employment, technical training

23 7. Alternative to detention strategies 8. Co-located services at our Re-entry Services Center 19. What challenges does your county face in meeting these program and service needs? It has proven difficult to find service providers who are trained in the use of any evidence based curriculum. Staff turnover in community based programs has also been a challenge. Staff turnover often results in a gap in data collection, service delivery and ability to provide services by well trained staff. Ongoing training is needed in using evidence-based practices and best practices for private agencies. 20. What programmatic changes and/or course corrections have you made in the implementation of Public Safety Realignment that you believe other counties would find helpful? No response. 21. Describe a local best practice or promising program that has produced positive results. If data exists to support the results, please share. In last year s report, we shared information regarding the transitional housing program we set up in 2014, and the success we saw as a result of providing stable housing, case management, life skills groups and mandatory attendance of our day reporting center for those not employed or attending school. We reported that during the 15/16 FY, 85% of those that completed the transitional housing program secured stable housing or moved into a residential treatment program. This year, we are happy to report that the transitional housing program has continued to show success for the residents. We have expanded our use of the facility to add access to four additional beds for female clients and eight additional emergency beds. For those residents who obtain employment, they are required to place 75% of their earnings into a savings account, which are returned to them upon their exit from the program. The average stay in the program is between 120 and 180 days. While we continue to see the majority of resident s transition from the program into their own housing, we now have data regarding their financial status. The current residents have saved a total of $31,404, an average of $2,854 per client. Most residents who need transitional housing are no longer welcome home or don t want to return there, don t have a job and can t afford rent or deposits necessary to secure their own housing. Providing them a place to stay so that their criminogenic needs can be addressed while simultaneously earning a paycheck and saving their money has really helped them re-establish themselves in the community. 22. Describe how the BSCC can assist your county in meeting its Public Safety Realignment goals through training and/or technical assistance? a) Technical assistance in the form of methodology and technology infrastructure to collect data statewide about recidivism as defined by BSCC. Not leave it to each individual county with their narrow county-wide data limitations. b) Technical assistance for quality assurance to assist with the implementation of evidence based programs.

24 NOTE: The information contained in this report will be made public by the BSCC in the annual report to the Governor s Office and the Legislature on the implementation of Community Corrections Partnership plans in print and on the BSCC website. 23. Provide the contact information for the individual completing this survey in the spaces provided to the right of the list. Name Nancy Hatton Organization Monterey County Probation Address 20 E. Alisal St. Address 2 City/Town Salinas ZIP Code Address hattonn@co.monterey.ca.us Phone Number Identify the individual who may be contacted for follow up questions. Use an X to check the box to the left of the list. X Same as above Other (If "Other" provide contact information below) Name Organization Address Address 2 City/Town ZIP Code Address Phone Number ATTENTION: This is only Part A of the Survey. Please complete Part B in Microsoft Excel which consists of two (2) budgetary sections SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS: In a single , please attach both the completed Part A (Word) and completed Part B (Excel) documents, including any optional photos and/or quotes, and to: Helene Zentner, Field Representative Board of State and Community Corrections or Helene.Zentner@bscc.ca.gov

25 FY Community Corrections Partnership Survey PART B SECTION 4: FY Public Safety Realignment Funding Allocation Section 4 contains questions related to the allocation of FY Public Safety Realignment dollars. There are three (3) questions in this section. When answering these questions, consider the total funds received in FY , which should include growth and programmatic funding. To view your response provided in the 2016 survey, click here. Responses are captured in the Individual County Profile section of the "2011 Public Safety Realignment Act: Fifth Annual Report on the Implementation of Community Corrections Partnership Plans." County Name: Monterey 25. Of the total funds received in FY , how did the CCP budget the allocation? Input the total allocation in the cell above the table. Within the table, identify where funds were allocated to, and include if you are using any carry-over funds and/or if you are putting any funds into a reserve fund. Please correct the information provided if there is a difference showing between the stated total allocation and the calculated amount (directly below the table). Differences will automatically display in red. Example: Total Allocation: $ 40,000,000 Where funds were allocated to: Probation Department Mental Health Agency Sheriff Department ABC Police Department Other (Social Services, Health Services, etc.) Please specify by agency Carry-over Funds Reserve Funds $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Amount 8,000,000 8,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 12,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Please spell out all names, no acronyms. Total sums to: Difference from Stated Allocation: $ $ 40,000,000 - Total Allocation: $ 13,064,817 Where funds were allocated to: Amount Behavioral Health $ 1,263,214 Probation $ 3,974,683 Probation- Service Administrator $ 2,576,222 District Attorney $ 90,179 Sheriff $ 5,160,519 Please spell out all names, no acronyms. (Total sums to) $ 13,064,817 Difference from Stated Allocation: $ -

26 26. Of the total funds received in FY , how much did the CCP allocate to public agencies for programs and services? How much did the CCP allocate to non-public agencies for programs and services? Input the total allocations in the cells above each table. Within the tables, identify where funds were allocated to. Please correct the information provided if there is a difference showing between the stated total allocation and the calculated amount (directly below the table). Differences will automatically display in red. Example: Total Allocation to public agencies: $ 14,000,000 Total Allocation to non-public agencies: $ 15,000,000 Where funds were allocated to (public agencies): Amount ABC Drug Court $ 5,000,000 ABC Diversion Program $ 2,800,000 GPS/Electronic Monitoring $ 4,000,000 In-custody services $ 2,200,000 Other (please specify) Where funds were allocated to (non-public agencies): Amount Community-based Organizations $ 5,000,000 Faith-Based Organizations $ 2,000,000 Non-Profits $ 4,000,000 Treatment Programs $ 2,000,000 Other (please specify) $ 2,000,000 Please spell out all names, no acronyms. (Total sums to) $ 14,000,000 Difference from Stated Allocation: $ - Please spell out all names, no acronyms. (Total sums to) $ 15,000,000 Difference from Stated Allocation: $ - Total Allocation to public agencies: $ 10,157,240 Total Allocation to non-public agencies: $ 2,907,577 Where funds were allocated to (public agencies): Amount Where funds were allocated to (non-public agencies): Amount Treatment- Behavioral Health $ 556,120 Introspect $ 78,068 In-Custody Services- Sheriff $ 5,082,451 Rancho Cielo, Inc $ 217,463 Employment- Economic Development Department/WDB $ 411,807 Turning Point of Central California, Inc. $ 685,777 Victim Services- District Attorney $ 90,179 Geo Reentry Services, LLC $ 1,219,175 Supervision- Probation $ 3,314,664 Valley Health Associates $ 9,554 Data Collection, Administration and Evaluation- Probation $ 702,019 The Village Project, Inc. $ 82,334 Door to Hope $ 134,770 Community Human Services $ 132,061 Sun Street Centers $ 219,722 *Mental Health Services as Determined by Treatment Plan $ 128,653 Please spell out all names, no acronyms. (Total sums to) $ 10,157,240 (Total sums to) $ 2,907,577 Difference from Please spell out all names, Difference from Stated Allocation: $ - no acronyms. Stated Allocation: $ How much funding, if any, was allocated to data collection and/or evaluation of AB 109 programs and services?

27 SECTION 5: FY Public Safety Realignment Funding Allocation Section 5 asks two (2) questions related to the allocation of FY Public Safety Realignment funding. When answering these questions consider the total funds received in FY , which should include growth and programmatic funding. 28. Of the total funds received in FY , how did the CCP budget the allocation? Please identify the total allocation you received, if you are using any carry-over funds, and/or if you are putting any funds into a reserve fund. Input the total allocation in the cell above the table. Within the table, identify where funds were allocated to, and include if you are using any carry-over funds and/or if you are putting any funds into a reserve fund. Please correct the information provided if there is a difference showing between the stated total allocation and the calculated amount (directly below the table). Differences will automatically display in red. Example: Total Allocation: $ 40,000,000 Where funds were allocated to: Amount Probation Department $ 8,000,000 Mental Health Agency $ 8,000,000 Sheriff Department $ 4,000,000 ABC Police Department $ 4,000,000 Other (Social Services, Health Services, etc.) Please specify by agency $ 12,000,000 Carry-over Funds $ 2,000,000 Reserve Funds $ 2,000,000 Please spell out all names, no acronyms. (Total sums to) $ 40,000,000 Difference from Stated Allocation: $ - Total Allocation: $ 13,436,473 Where funds were allocated to: Amount Behavioral Health $ 1,297,186 Probation $ 4,423,175 Probation- Service Administrator $ 2,453,500 District Attorney $ 340,017 Public Defender $ 245,064 Sheriff $ 4,677,531 Please spell out all names, no acronyms. (Total sums to) $ 13,436,473 Difference from Stated Allocation: $ -

28 29. If known: of the total funds received in FY , how much did the CCP allocate to public agencies for programs and services? How much did the CCP allocate to non-public agencies for programs and services? Input the total allocations in the cells above each table. Within the tables, identify where funds were allocated to. Please correct the information provided if there is a difference showing between the stated total allocation and the calculated amount (directly below the table). Differences will automatically display in red. Example: Total Allocation to public agencies: $ 14,000,000 Total Allocation to non-public agencies: $ 15,000,000 Where funds were allocated to (public agencies): Amount Where funds were allocated to (non-public agencies): Amount ABC Drug Court $ 5,000,000 Community-Based Organizations $ 5,000,000 ABC Diversion Program $ 2,800,000 Faith-Based Organizations $ 2,000,000 GPS/Electronic Monitoring $ 4,000,000 Non-Profits $ 4,000,000 In-custody Services $ 2,200,000 Treatment Programs $ 2,000,000 Other (please specify) Other (please specify) $ 2,000,000 Please spell out all names, no acronyms. (Total sums to) $ 14,000,000 (Total sums to) $ 15,000,000 Difference from Please spell out all names, Difference from Stated Allocation: $ - no acronyms. Stated Allocation: $ - Total Allocation to public agencies: $ 10,772,269 Total Allocation to non-public agencies: $ 2,664,204 Where funds were allocated to (public agencies): Amount Where funds were allocated to (non-public agencies): Amount Treatment- Behavioral Health $ 591,397 Geo Reentry Services, LLC $ 1,055,175 In-Custody Services- Sheriff $ 4,517,531 Rancho Cielo, Inc. $ 217,463 Employment- Economic Development Department/WDB $ 416,885 Turning Point of Central California, Inc. $ 685,777 Victim Services, Early Resolution Court- District Attorney $ 340,017 Valley Health Associates $ 9,667 Early Resolution Court- Public Defender $ 245,064 The Village Project, Inc. $ 44,221 Supervision- Probation $ 3,676,457 Door to Hope $ 137,779 Data Collection, Administration and Evaluation- Probation $ 984,918 Community Human Services $ 171,257 Sun Street Centers $ 228,546 *Mental Health Services as Determined by Treatment Plan $ 114,319 Please spell out all names, no acronyms. (Total sums to) $ 10,772,269 (Total sums to) $ 2,664,204 Difference from Please spell out all names, Difference from Stated Allocation: $ - no acronyms. Stated Allocation: $ - NOTE: The information contained in this report will be made public by the BSCC in the annual report to the Governor s Office and the Legislature on the implementation of Community Corrections Partnership plans in print and on the BSCC website. ATTENTION: This is only Part B of the Survey. Please complete Part A in Microsoft Word which consists of three (3) narrative sections. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS: In a single , please attach both the completed Part A (Word) and completed Part B (Excel) documents, including any optional photos and/or quotes, and to: Thank you. Helene Zentner, Field Representative Board of State and Community Corrections or Helene.Zentner@bscc.ca.gov