Errors and acceptable correction methods Revised May 2017

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Errors and acceptable correction methods Revised May 2017"

Transcription

1 Revised May 2017 SCP and VCP Error Index Error Description 01 Failure to properly provide the minimum top-heavy benefit or contribution to non-key employees. 02 Failure to satisfy the ADP test, the ACP test, or, for plan years beginning on or before December 31, 2001, the multiple use test. [Option 1] 03 Failure to satisfy the ADP test, the ACP test, or, for plan years beginning on or before December 31, 2001, the multiple use test. [Option 2] 04 Failure to distribute elective deferrals in excess of the section 402(g) limit. 05 Employee elective deferral failure that does not exceed 3 months. 06 Employee elective deferral failure that extends beyond 3 months but not past the SCP Significant Failure Deadline. 07 Employee elective deferral failure to implement an automatic contribution feature (available until January 1, 2021) 08 Exclusion of an eligible employee from making elective deferrals or employee post-tax contributions, or from receiving matching contributions for one or more plan years. 09 Exclusion of an employee eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan from making elective deferrals or employee post-tax contributions, or from receiving matching contributions for less than one year. 10 Exclusion of an employee eligible to participate in a safe harbor 401(k) plan from making elective deferrals. 11 Failure to implement an employee election. 12 Exclusion of an eligible employee from a plan that permits designated Roth contributions. 13 Exclusion of an eligible employee to make catch-up contributions to a 401(k) plan. 14 Exclusion of an eligible employee from receiving a profit sharing contribution. [Option 1] 15 Exclusion of an eligible employee from receiving a profit sharing contribution. [Option 2] 16 Failure of a 403(b) plan to satisfy the universal availability rule. 17 Failure to timely pay the required minimum distribution (RMD) under section 401(a)(9). 18 Failure to obtain participant and/or spousal consent for a distribution subject to the participant and spousal consent rules. 19 Failure to satisfy the defined contribution annual additions limits for limitation years beginning before January 1, Failure to satisfy the defined contribution annual additions limits for limitation years beginning on or after January 1, Failure to satisfy the defined contribution annual additions limit with respect to an NHCE. 1

2 VCP only Error Index 22 Error Description Failure to satisfy the defined contribution annual additions limit, where the portion of the excess attributable to matching and nonelective contributions has already been distributed. 23 Overpayments because of amounts paid in excess of the defined benefit annual benefit limit. 24 Vesting error in a defined contribution plan that results in forfeiture too large a portion of the employee s account balance. All overpayment errors, including distributions exceeding the employee s or beneficiary s benefit under the plan due to an error in applying the 25 compensation limit ($200,000 as indexed), an error in forfeiting nonvested ACP excesses, or an error in forfeiting matching contributions attributable to Excess Amounts Allocation of contributions or forfeitures under a defined contribution plan based on compensation in excess of the compensation limit ($200,000 as indexed). [Option 1] Allocation of contributions or forfeitures under a defined contribution plan based on compensation in excess of the compensation limit ($200,000 as indexed). [Option 2] Hardship distributions made under a plan that does not allow hardship distributions or plan loans made under a plan that does not allow plan loans. Inclusion of employee who has not met the plan s minimum age or service requirement or who was included too soon due to an incorrect plan entry date. 30 Employer eligibility error. 31 Loan amount exceeding the maximum permissible amount ($50,000/50% limit). 32 Loan repayment period exceeds the maximum permissible repayment period (5 years for a general purpose loan). 33 Loans that do not meet the level amortization requirements. 34 Loan default errors. 2

3 Rev. IRS Revenue Procedure , which replaces and supersedes Revenue Procedure , lists a number of errors that can be corrected under the various programs and some specific correction methods that are deemed acceptable to correct these errors. The list is only a sample of the errors that can be corrected under EPCRS. Many other types of errors commonly occur and can be corrected using EPCRS, but the IRS has not published specific correction methods. The list of correction methods below was created to give employers sponsoring qualified pension, profit sharing, stock bonus, and 403(b) plans guidance about acceptable correction methods for some of the most common errors and may be expanded as the IRS sees fit. The errors listed can also be corrected using a method other than that described below. However, any other correction method must meet the General Correction Principles under EPCRS, and any employer interested in using an EPCRS program must meet that program s eligibility requirements (see IRS Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS) Options). The following correction methods are available under both SCP and VCP. 1. Failure to properly provide the minimum top-heavy benefit or contribution to nonkey employees. 2. Failure to satisfy the ADP test, the ACP test, or, for plan years beginning on or before December 31, 2001, the multiple use test. [Option 1] Defined contribution plan: The plan sponsor must properly contribute and allocate the required top-heavy minimums to the plan in the manner provided for in the plan on behalf of the non-key employees (and any other employees required to receive top-heavy allocations under the plan). The corrective allocation must include lost earnings. Defined benefit plan: The non-key employees must accrue the minimum required benefit in the manner provided in the plan. QNEC method: The plan sponsor must make qualified nonelective contributions (QNECs) to nonhighly compensated employees (NHCEs) to the extent necessary to raise the ADP or ACP of the NHCEs to the percentage needed to pass the test or tests. These contributions must: Be made on behalf of all eligible NHCEs (to the extent that the Code section 415 limits on annual additions are not exceeded); and Be the same percentage of compensation; and Include lost earnings. Plan forfeitures may not be used to fund the QNECs. Employer A maintains only a profit sharing plan that provides for elective deferrals and nonelective contributions. Employer A did not make a profit sharing contribution for In 2007, Employer A discovers that the plan was top-heavy for 2005, and the Employer did not make the minimum required contribution. In 2007, Employer A contributes the top-heavy minimum to the plan: 3% of compensation, adjusted for lost earnings, to each non-key individual employed on the last day of the 2005 plan year. Employer L maintains a 401(k) plan that uses the current year ADP testing method. The plan does not provide for matching or after-tax contributions. In 2007, it was discovered that testing for 2005 was performed incorrectly. When rerun, the 2005 ADP test was not satisfied. The 2005 HCE ADP was 9%. The 2005 NHCE ADP was 4%. The plan would not have passed the ADP test if the prior year method was used. Employer L must make a QNEC to eligible NHCEs to raise the NHCE ADP to 7%. 3

4 The plan sponsor does not have to match the QNECs made to satisfy the ADP test. However, employees who would have been eligible for a matching contribution if they had made elective deferral contributions must be counted as eligible employees for the ACP test, and the plan must satisfy the ACP test. Under this correction method, a plan may not be treated as two separate plans, one covering otherwise excludable employees and the other covering all other employees to reduce the number of employees eligible to receive QNECs. Likewise, under this correction method, the plan may not be restructured into component plans (as permitted for plan years before January 1, 1992) to reduce the number of employees eligible to receive QNECs. Employer L calculates the QNEC to be 3% of compensation for all eligible employees, giving the same percentage of compensation to each. The amount allocated to each account includes lost earnings. 3. Failure to satisfy the ADP test, the ACP test, or, for plan years beginning on or before December 31, 2001, the multiple use test. [Option 2] One-to-One method: The plan sponsor a) Distributes the excess amounts to the highly compensated employees (HCEs), and b) Allocates an equal amount as a QNEC to the nonhighly compensated employees (NHCEs). The excess amount to be returned to an HCE is the sum of any excesses determined from the ADP, ACP and multiple use tests, adjusted for earnings through the date of the correction. Any amounts that were not vested as of the close of the plan year of the error are forfeited. Amounts forfeited are used according to the plan s forfeiture provisions in place for the year of the error. If an excess amount has already been distributed to an HCE, the employer must notify the employee that the distribution was not eligible for favorable tax treatment, Employer S maintains a 401(k) plan that uses the current year ADP testing method. The plan provides for matching and after-tax contributions. Matching contributions equal 50% of the sum of elective deferrals and after-tax contributions that do not exceed 10% of the employee s compensation. Matching contributions are subject to a 5-year graded vesting schedule. Matching contributions are forfeited and used to reduce employer contributions if associated elective deferrals or after-tax contributions are distributed to correct an ADP, or ACP test failure. For 2005, only NHCEs made after-tax contributions. Two HCEs were eligible in 2005, Employee P and Employee Q. Employee P made elective deferrals of $10,000, which was 10% of his compensation for 2005 ($100,000). Employee Q made elective deferrals of $9,500, which was 8% of his 2005 compensation ($118,750). Employee P received a matching contribution of $5,000 (50% of 4

5 such as a tax-free rollover. If an excess matching amount that should have been forfeited has been paid to an HCE, this amount is an Overpayment that must be corrected (see Failure to satisfy the defined contribution annual additions limit, where the portion of the excess attributable to matching and nonelective contributions has already been distributed). The total QNEC amount to be allocated to NHCEs is the sum of all excess contributions adjusted for earnings through the date of the correction, excluding forfeited related matching contributions. Plan forfeitures may not be used to fund the QNEC. The plan sponsor must pick the group of employees who will receive the contribution from the following choices*: Individuals who were eligible to participate and were NHCEs in the year of the error. Individuals who were eligible to participate and were NHCEs both in the year of the error and the year of correction. Individuals who were eligible to participate and were NHCEs in the year of the error, but who are still employees as of a date in the year of correction that is no later than the date of correction. Individuals who were eligible to participate and were NHCEs both in the year of the error and the year of correction, but who are still employees as of a date in the year of correction that is no later than the date of correction. *The four options listed above assume the plan sponsor uses the current year testing method. If the prior year testing method is used, substitute the year prior to the year of the error for the year of the error in the dot $10,000). Employee Q received a matching contribution of $4,750 (50% of $9,500). Employees P and Q were 100% vested in In 2007, it was discovered that testing for 2005 was performed incorrectly. When rerun, the 2005 ADP test was not satisfied. The 2005 HCE ADP was 9%. The 2005 NHCE ADP was 4%. The plan would not have passed the ADP test if the prior year method was used. The ACP test would have been satisfied for 2005 without any corrective action. Employer S calculates the dollar amount of the excess contributions for the two HCEs. The excess contribution for Employee P is $3, The earnings on Employee P s excess are $687. Employee P receives a distribution of $4, ($3, plus $687). The excess contribution for Employee Q is $2, The earnings of Employee Q s excess are $587. Employee Q receives a distribution of $3, ($2, plus $587). The total of the excesses, adjusted for earnings, is $7,649. Employer S makes a corrective contribution to the plan in the amount of $7,649. The corrective contribution is allocated to eligible NHCEs for 2005, pro rata based on 2005 compensation. Employee P s and Employee Q s matching contributions related to the distributed excesses, adjusted for earnings, are forfeited. The forfeited amounts are used to reduce contributions for 2007 and subsequent years. 5

6 points above. Regardless which group the employer selects to receive the contribution, it is allocated to each employee as a uniform allocation (as a percentage of compensation). The allocation is not adjusted further for earnings. It is treated as an annual addition for the year of the error. Under this correction method, a plan may not be treated as two separate plans, one covering otherwise excludable employees and the other covering all other employees to reduce the number of employees eligible to receive QNECs. 4. Failure to distribute elective deferrals in excess of the section 402(g) limit. Likewise, restructuring the plan into component plans is not permitted to reduce the number of employees eligible to receive QNECs. The plan must distribute the excess deferral, and allocable earnings, to the employee and report the amount as taxable in the year of deferral and the year distributed. The inclusion of the deferral and the distribution in gross income applies whether or not any portion of the excess deferral is a designated Roth contribution. A distribution to a highly compensated employee is included in the ADP test. A distribution to a nonhighly compensated employee is not included in the ADP test. Employer P maintains a 401(k) plan. Employee W (an HCE) and Employee U (a NHCE) each exceeded the section 402(g) deferral limit of $15,500 in The error is discovered in May of The 2007 Form W-2 for Employee W and Employee U will reflect deferrals greater than $15,500. The employees will be allowed to defer taxation on only $15,500 when they file their tax return. The employees will need to report the excess as taxable income in The amounts deferred above $15,500, adjusted for earnings, are removed from the accounts and distributed to Employee W and Employee U in Employee W and Employee U will receive a 2008 Form 1099R showing the excess amounts removed, and allocable earnings, as taxable in The excess amount distributed to Employee W is included in the 2007 ADP test. The excess amount distributed to Employee U is not included in the 2007 ADP test. 6

7 5. Employee elective deferral failure that does not exceed 3 months. No employer contribution is required to correct missed elective deferrals if all of the following conditions are satisfied: The correct deferrals begin by the earlier of: o The first payroll period occurring 3 months following the initial date of the error, or o The first payroll period occurring on or after the last day of the month following the month in which the participant notified the plan sponsor of the failure. The employer makes corrective contributions to make up for missed matching contributions, adjusted for earnings; and Affected employees are notified within 45 days following the date the correct deferrals begin. Participant notices must contain all of the following information: 1. General information relating to the failure, such as the deferral percentage that should have applied and the approximate date that the deferrals should have begun; 2. A statement that appropriate amounts have begun to be deducted from compensation and contributed to the plan (or will begin shortly); 3. A statement that corrective contributions for missed matching contributions have been made (or will be made); 4. An explanation that the participant may increase his deferral percentage to make up for the missed deferral opportunity, subject to applicable limit under section 402(g); and 5. The plan name and plan contact information (including name, street address, address, and telephone number of a plan contact). 6. Employee elective deferral failure that extends beyond 3 The plan sponsor must make a QNEC to the plan for the employee that is equal to the missed deferral opportunity. The missed deferral opportunity is equal to 7

8 months but not past the SCP Significant Failure Deadline. 25% of the missed deferral. Under a non-safe harbor 401(k) plan, the missed deferral is equal to the ADP for the employee s group (either HCE or NHCE) multiplied by compensation for the time period the exclusion occurred. Compensation can be prorated for this purpose. In a safe harbor 401(k) plan, the employee s missed deferral is determined by multiplying 3% (or, if greater, whatever percentage of the participant s compensation which, if contributed as an elective deferrals, would have been matched at a rate of 100% or more) by the employee s plan compensation for the time period the exclusion occurred. In addition, all of the following conditions must be satisfied: The correct deferrals begin by the earlier of: o The first payroll period occurring after the last day of the second plan year following the plan year in which the error occurred, or o The first payroll period occurring on or after the last day of the month following the month in which the participant notified the plan sponsor of the failure. The employer also makes corrective contributions to make up for missed matching contributions, adjusted for earnings; and Affected employees are notified within 45 days following the date the correct deferrals begin. Participant notices must contain all of the following information: 1. General information relating to the failure, such as the deferral percentage that should have applied and the approximate date that the deferrals should have begun; 2. A statement that appropriate amounts have begun 8

9 to be deducted from compensation and contributed to the plan (or will begin shortly); 3. A statement that corrective contributions have been made (or will be made); 4. An explanation that the participant may increase his deferral percentage to make up for the missed deferral opportunity, subject to applicable limit under section 402(g); and 5. The plan name and plan contact information (including name, street address, address, and telephone number of a plan contact). 7. Employee elective deferral failure to implement an automatic contribution feature (available for failures beginning on or before December 31, 2020) This correction method applies to both situations where the default contribution percentage was not applied and situations where an alternative percentage affirmatively elected by a participant in an automatic contribution plan was not applied. No employer contribution is required to correct missed elective deferrals if all of the following conditions are satisfied: The correct deferrals begin by the earlier of: o The first payroll period occurring after 9½ months following the end of the plan year in which the failure occurred, or o The first payroll period occurring on or after the last day of the month following the month in which the participant notified the plan sponsor of the failure; The employer makes corrective contributions to make up for missed matching contributions, adjusted for earnings; and Affected employees are notified within 45 days following the date the correct deferrals begin. Participant notices must contain all of the following information: 1. General information relating to the failure, such as the deferral percentage that should have applied 9

10 and the approximate date that the deferrals should have begun; 2. A statement that appropriate amounts have begun to be deducted from compensation and contributed to the plan (or will begin shortly); 3. A statement that corrective contributions for missed matching contributions have been made (or will be made); 4. An explanation that the participant may increase his deferral percentage to make up for the missed deferral opportunity, subject to applicable limit under section 402(g); and 5. The plan name and plan contact information (including name, street address, address, and telephone number of a plan contact). 8. Exclusion of an eligible employee from making employee posttax contributions (to a defined contribution or defined benefit plan) or elective deferrals, or from receiving matching contributions for one or more plan years. Defined contribution plan: The plan sponsor must make a contribution to the plan on behalf of the excluded employees. The corrective contributions must include lost earnings. If the employee was eligible to make an elective deferral contribution under a non-safe harbor 401(k) plan, the plan sponsor must make a QNEC to the plan for the employee that is equal to the missed deferral opportunity. The missed deferral opportunity is equal to 50% of the missed deferral. The missed deferral is equal to the ADP for the employee s group (either HCE or NHCE). The employee s missed deferral amount is reduced further to the extent necessary to ensure that the missed deferral does not exceed applicable plan limits, including the annual deferral limit. If the employee would have received an allocation of employer matching contributions under a non-safe harbor 401(k) plan, but did not receive the matching contributions because the employee was not given the opportunity to make elective deferrals, the employer must make a Employer B maintains a 401(k) plan. Employees may enter the plan on the January 1 or July 1 following the completion of one year of service. Employee V (a NHCE), who met the eligibility requirements and should have entered the plan on January 1, 2006 was not offered the opportunity to participate for the 2006 plan year. Employee V s compensation for the 2006 plan year was $30,000. For 2006, the ADP for NHCEs was 8% and the ACP for NHCEs was 2.63%.The ACP attributable to matching contributions for NHCEs was 2%. The ACP attributable to post-tax contributions was.63% The error was discovered in Employer B makes a QNEC for the excluded employee. Elective Deferrals: Employee V receives a QNEC equal to the missed deferral opportunity for Employee V - 50% of Employee V s missed deferral. The missed deferral for Employee V is $2,400 (8% x $30,000). The missed deferral opportunity is $1,200 (50% x $2,400). Thus, Employee V will receive $1,200 (plus earnings). Matching contributions: Employee V should have been eligible for, but did not receive a matching contribution because Employee V was not provided the opportunity to make elective deferrals in

11 corrected employer matching contribution on behalf of the affected employee. The corrective employer matching contribution will be equal to the matching contribution the employee would have received had the employee made a deferral equal to the missed deferral determined above, adjusted for earnings. If the employee was eligible to make employee post-tax contributions (other than designated Roth contributions), the employer must make a QNEC to the plan for the employee that is equal to 40% of the employee s missed post-tax contributions. The employee s missed post-tax contributions are equal to the ACP for the employee s group (either HCE or NHCE). If the employee would have received an allocation of employer matching contributions under a traditional 401(k) plan, but did not receive the matching contributions because the employee was not given the opportunity to make post-tax contributions, the employer must make a corrective employer matching contribution on behalf of the affected employee. The corrective employer matching contribution will be equal to the matching contribution the employee would have received had the employee made post-tax contributions equal to the missed post-tax contributions determined above, adjusted for earnings. Under this correction method, a plan may not be treated as two separate plans, one covering otherwise excludable employees and the other covering all other employees to reduce the number of employees eligible to receive QNECs. Likewise, restructuring the plan into component plans is not permitted to reduce the number of employees eligible to receive QNECs. These correction methods do not apply until other Thus, Employer B must make a corrective employer matching contribution to the plan on behalf of Employee V that is equal to the matching contribution Employee V would have received had the missed deferral been made. Under the terms of the plan, if Employee V had made an elective deferral of $2,400 (8% x $30,000), the employee would have been entitled to a matching contribution of 100% of the first 3% of Employee V s compensation ($30,000) or $900, plus earnings. Post-tax contributions: Employee V was eligible to, but not provided with, the opportunity to make post-tax contributions from January 1 through August 31 of Employer B must make a QNEC for Employee V equal to the missed opportunity for making post-tax contributions for Employee V 40% of Employee V s missed posttax contributions, adjusted for earnings. The missed post-tax contribution is $189 (.63% x $30,000). The missed opportunity to make post-tax contributions is $76 (40% x $189), adjusted for earnings. The total required corrective contribution, before adjustment for earnings, for Employee V is $2,176 ($1,200+$900+$76). The corrective contribution for the missed deferral opportunity ($1200), the missed opportunity for post-tax contributions ($76), and earnings, must be made in the form of a QNEC. 11

12 qualification failures are corrected. For example, if in addition to the failure of excluding an eligible employee, the plan also failed the ADP or ACP test, the correction methods described above cannot be used until after the correction of the ADP or ACP test failures. 9. Exclusion of an eligible employee from making employee posttax contributions (to a defined contribution or defined benefit plan) or elective deferrals, or from receiving matching contributions for less than one year. Defined benefit plan: The excluded employees must accrue their lost benefits. Exclusion for more than 3 months but less than one year The plan sponsor must make a contribution to the plan on behalf of the excluded employees. The corrective contributions must include lost earnings. If the employee was eligible to make an elective deferral contribution under a non-safe harbor 401(k) plan, the plan sponsor must make a QNEC to the plan for the employee that is equal to the missed deferral opportunity. The missed deferral opportunity is equal to 50% of the missed deferral. The missed deferral is equal to the ADP for the employee s group (either HCE or NHCE) multiplied by compensation for the time period the exclusion occurred. Compensation can be prorated for this purpose. The employee s missed deferral amount is reduced further to the extent necessary to ensure that the missed deferral does not exceed applicable plan limits, including the annual deferral limit. If the employee would have received an allocation of employer matching contributions under a traditional 401(k) plan, but did not receive the matching contributions because the employee was not given the opportunity to make elective deferral contributions, the employer must make a corrective employer matching contribution on behalf of the affected employee. The corrective employer matching contribution will be equal to the matching contribution the employee would have received had the Example for exclusion for more than 3 months but less than one year: Employer C maintains a non-safe harbor 401(k) plan. Employees may enter the plan on the January 1 or July 1 after completing one year of service. The plan provides for matching contributions equal to 100% of an employee s elective deferrals up to 2% of compensation during the payroll period. The plan provides for post-tax contributions, which may not exceed $1,000 for the plan year. Employee X (a NHCE), who met the eligibility requirements and should have entered the plan on January 1, 2006 was not offered the opportunity to participate. Employee X s plan compensation for 2006 was $36,000. The error was discovered in August 2006 and the employee was allowed to participate as of September 1, Employee X made elective deferrals of 4% of compensation for each payroll period from September 1, 2006 to December 31, The employee s plan compensation for 2006 was $36,000 ($26,000 for the first eight months and $10,000 for the last four months). Employer C made $200 in matching contributions to the excluded employee, which is 2% of the employee s plan compensation for each payroll period from September 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 ($10,000). The 2006 NHCE ADP was 3%. The 2006 NHCE ACP was 1.8%. Employer C makes a corrective contribution for the excluded employee to make up the missed elective deferrals, matching contributions, and post-tax contributions. Elective Deferrals: To calculate the QNEC for the missed elective 12

13 employee made elective deferral contributions equal to the missed deferral determined above, adjusted for earnings. If the employee was eligible to make employee post-tax contributions (other than designated Roth contributions), the employer must make a QNEC to the plan for the employee that is equal to 40% of the employee s missed post-tax contributions. The employee s missed post-tax contributions are equal to the ACP for the employee s group (either HCE or NHCE) multiplied by compensation for the time period the exclusion occurred. Compensation can be prorated for this purpose. If the employee would have received an allocation of employer matching contributions under a traditional 401(k) plan, but did not receive the matching contributions because the employee was not given the opportunity to make post-tax contributions, the employer must make a corrective employer matching contribution on behalf of the affected employee. The corrective employer matching contribution will be equal to the matching contribution the employee would have received had the employee made the post tax contributions equal to the missed post-tax contributions determined above, adjusted for earnings. The maximum corrective employer matching contribution that can be made to correct missed matching contributions and employee post-tax contributions is equal to the sum of the matching contributions that would have been made for the employee if the employee had contributed the maximum matchable contributions permitted and the maximum post-tax contributions permitted under the plan for the plan year, minus matching and/or post-tax contributions already made for/by the participant that plan year. Under this correction method, a plan may not be treated deferrals, the employer pro-rates the employee s plan compensation for the eight-month period that the employee was improperly excluded (8/12ths of $36,000, or $24,000). The missed deferral for Employee V is $720 (3% NHCE ADP times $24,000), adjusted for earnings. The missed deferral opportunity is $360 (50% x $720). Thus, Employee X will receive a QNEC equal to $360 (plus earnings) for the missed elective deferrals. Matching contribution: Under the terms of the plan, if Employee X had made an elective deferral of $720 or 3% of compensation for the period of exclusion ($24,000), the employee would have been entitled to a matching contribution equal to 2% of $24,000 or $480. Employee X will receive a corrective employer matching contribution equal to $480 (plus earnings) for the matching contributions. Post-tax contributions: Employee X was eligible to, but not provided with, the opportunity to make post-tax contributions from January 1 through August 31, of Employer C must make a QNEC for Employee X equal to the missed opportunity to make post-tax contributions (40% of Employee X s missed post-tax contributions), adjusted for earnings. The missed post-tax contribution amount is $120 (8/12ths of the employee s 2006 plan compensation of $36,000 ($24,000) x 0.5% ACP. The required corrective contribution is $48 (40% x $120), adjusted for earnings. The total required corrective contribution for Employee X is $888 ($360 + $480 + $48), adjusted for earnings. The corrective contribution for the missed deferral opportunity ($360), the missed opportunity for the post-tax contributions ($48), and earnings must be made in the form of a QNEC. Example for exclusion for 3 months or less in a plan year: Employer E s 401(k) plan allows employees to enter the plan on the January 1 or July 1 after completing one year of service. The plan provides for matching contributions of 100% of elective deferrals, up to 2% of compensation per payroll period. An NHCE should have entered the plan on January 1, 2006, but was not offered plan participation. The error was discovered in March 2006 and the employee was allowed to participate as of April 1, The amount the employee was allowed to defer was not less than the 13

14 as two separate plans, one covering otherwise excludable employees and the other covering all other employees to reduce the number of employees eligible to receive QNECs. Likewise, restructuring the plan into component plans is not permitted to reduce the number of employees eligible to receive QNECs. These correction methods do not apply until other qualification failures are corrected. For example, if in addition to the failure of excluding an eligible employee, the plan also failed the ADP or ACP test, the correction methods described above cannot be used until after the correction of the ADP or ACP test failures. Exclusion for 3 months or less in a plan year If the employee is allowed to make deferrals for at least the last 9 months of the plan year in an amount at least equal to the maximum permitted if no error occurred, then the employer is not required to make a corrective contribution with respect to elective deferrals or employee post-tax contributions. However, the employer is still required to make a corrective contribution to correct missed matching contributions. The corrective contributions must include lost earnings. The employer must make a corrective contribution to the plan for the employee that is equal to the ACP for the employee s group (either highly compensated or nonhighly compensated) multiplied by compensation for the time period the exclusion occurred. Compensation can be prorated for this purpose. The maximum corrective contribution that can be made to correct missed matching contributions and employee posttax contributions is equal to the sum of the matching maximum deferrals the employee could have made if given the opportunity to defer on January 1, The employee made elective deferrals of 4% of compensation for each payroll period from April 1, 2006 to December 31, The employee s plan compensation for 2006 was $40,000 ($8,000 for the first three months and $32,000 for the last nine months). Employer E made $640 in matching contributions to the excluded employee, which is 2% of the employee s plan compensation for each payroll period from April 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 ($32,000). The 2006 NHCE ADP was 3%. The 2006 NHCE ACP was 1.8%. Since the employee was given the opportunity to defer for at least the last 9 months of the plan year, Employer E is not required to make a corrective contribution to make up missed deferrals. Employer E does need to make a corrective contribution to make up missed matching contributions. The corrective contribution must include lost earnings. To calculate the corrective contribution, the employer pro-rates the employee s plan compensation for the three-month period that the employee was improperly excluded (3/12ths of $40,000, or $10,000). The amount of the corrective employer matching contribution calculated to make up missed matching contributions is $200 (2% times $10,000), adjusted for earnings. However, when $200 is added to the matching contribution already received ($640), the total ($840) exceeds the $750 plan limit on matching contributions by $90. Therefore, the missed matching contribution is reduced to $110 ($200 minus $90). The required corrective employer matching contribution is $110, adjusted for earnings. 14

15 contributions that would have been made for the employee if the employee had contributed the maximum matchable contributions permitted and the maximum posttax contributions permitted under the plan for the plan year, minus matching and/or post-tax contributions already made for/by the participant that plan year. 10. Exclusion of an employee eligible to participate in a safe harbor 401(k) plan from making elective deferrals (other than designated Roth contributions). In a safe harbor 401(k) plan, the employee s missed deferral is determined by multiplying 3% (or, if greater, whatever percentage of the participant s compensation which, if contributed as an elective deferrals, would have been matched at a rate of 100% or more) by the employee s plan compensation for the portion of the year during which the employee was improperly excluded. For a traditional safe harbor plan, the employer must make a QNEC to the plan for the employee that is equal to the amount of the missed deferral opportunity (50% of the missed deferral) plus the applicable safe harbor matching or nonelective contribution. For a qualified automatic contribution arrangement (QACA) plan, the employer must make a corrective employer contribution for the applicable safe harbor matching or contribution, instead of a QNEC. The employee s missed deferral amount is reduced further to the extent necessary to ensure that the missed deferral does not exceed applicable plan limits, including the annual deferral limit. Example for traditional safe harbor 401(k) plan using safe harbor match of 100% up to 3% of compensation, plus 50% from 3% to 5% of compensation. Employer G maintains a traditional safe harbor 401(k) plan that uses a rate of matching contributions to satisfy the safe harbor requirements. Employee M, an NHCE, should have entered the plan on January 1, 2006, was not offered the opportunity to participate for the 2006 plan year. The employee s compensation for 2006 was $20,000. Employer G makes a QNEC for the excluded employee. Elective Deferrals: The employee s missed deferral is 3% of compensation, or $600 (3% x $20,000). The required QNEC for the employee s missed deferral opportunity in 2006 is $300 (50% x $600.) Matching Contribution: The required QNEC for the missed matching contribution is $600. The total required QNEC for the employee is $900 ($300 + $600), plus earnings. Example for traditional safe harbor 401(k) plan using safe harbor match of 100% of elective deferrals up to 4% of compensation. Same facts as above, except the plan provides for matching contributions equal to 100% of elective deferrals that do not exceed 4% of an employee s compensation. Employer G makes a QNEC for the excluded employee. Elective Deferrals: The employee s missed deferral is 4% of compensation, or $800 (4% x $20,000). The required QNEC for the employee s missed deferral opportunity in 2006 is $400 (50% x 15

16 $800). Matching Contribution: The required QNEC for the missed matching contribution is $800. The total required QNEC for the employee is $1,200 ($400 + $800), plus earnings. Example for traditional safe harbor 401(k) Plan using nonelective contribution of 3% of compensation. Same facts as above, except the plan uses a nonelective contribution equal to 3% of compensation to satisfy the safe harbor requirements. Employer G makes a QNEC for the excluded employee. Elective Deferrals: The employee s missed deferral is 3% of compensation, or $600 ($20,000 x 3%). The required QNEC for the employee s missed deferral opportunity in 2006 is $300 (50% x $600). Matching Contribution: The required QNEC for the missed matching contribution is $600. The total required QNEC for the employee is $900 ($300 + $600), plus earnings. 11. Failure to implement an employee contribution election for employee deferrals or post-tax contributions For employees who made an election to make elective deferral contributions to the plan, which the employer failed to implement on a timely basis, the employer must make a QNEC to the plan for the employee that is equal to the missed deferral opportunity. The missed deferral opportunity is equal to 50% of the missed deferral. The missed deferral is equal to the employee s elected deferral percentage multiplied by the employee s compensation. If the employee elected a dollar amount for an elective deferral, the missed deferral would be the specified dollar amount. The employee s missed deferral amount is reduced further to the extent necessary to ensure that the missed deferral does not exceed applicable plan limits, including the annual deferral limit. For employees who made an election to make post-tax Employer K maintains a 401(k) plan. The plan provides for matching contributions equal to 100% of elective deferrals that do not exceed 3% of an employee s compensation. On January 1, 2006, Employee T made an election to contribute 10% of compensation for the 2006 plan year. However, Employee T s election was not processed and the required amounts were not withheld from Employee T s salary in For 2006, Employee T s salary was $30,000. Elective Deferrals: For the missed elective deferral, Employer K must make a QNEC to the plan on behalf of Employee T equal to 50% of Employee T s missed deferral. The missed deferral is equal to $3,000 (10% x $30,000). Employer K makes a QNEC to the plan equal to $1,500 (50% x $3,000), adjusted for earnings. Match: Employer K must make a corrective employer matching contribution to the plan on behalf of Employee T equal to the matching contribution Employee T would have received had the 16

17 employee contributions under the plan, which the employer failed to implement on a timely basis, the employer must make a QNEC to the plan for the employee that is equal to 40% of the employee s elected post-tax contribution percentage multiplied by the employee s compensation. If the employee would have been entitled to a matching contribution on the missed deferral or post-tax contribution, the employer must make a corrective contribution equal to the matching contribution the employee would have received if the employee had made a deferral equal to the missed deferral (not reduced by 50%) or the missed post-contribution (not reduced by 60%). If the plan is a traditional safe harbor plan, the corrective contribution must be made in the form of a QNEC. All corrective contributions must be adjusted for earnings. missed deferral been made. The corrective employer matching contribution is adjusted for earnings. Under the terms of the plan, if Employee T had made an elective deferral of $3,000, he would have been entitled to a matching contribution of 100% of the first 3% of compensation or $900 ($30,000 x 3%), plus earnings. The total required corrective contribution for Employee T is $2,400 ($1,500 for the missed deferral opportunity plus $900 for the missed matching contribution), plus earnings. The corrective contribution for the missed deferral opportunity ($1,500) and related earnings must be in the form of a QNEC. 12. Exclusion of an eligible employee from a 401(k) plan that permits designated Roth contributions Use the correction method for the exclusion of an employee from making pre-tax elective deferral contributions. The QNEC required to replace the missed deferral is made according to the method discussed for a traditional 401(k) plan or a safe harbor 401(k) plan, as applicable. 13. Exclusion of an eligible employee to make catch-up contributions to a 401(k) plan. However, the QNECs are not treated as designated Roth contributions and are not contributed to a designated Roth account. Instead, the contributions must be allocated as a QNEC or other employer contribution that is 100% vested and subject to withdrawal restrictions that apply to elective deferrals. The employer makes a QNEC equal to 50% of the employee s missed deferral attributable to catch-up contributions. The missed deferral is half of the catch-up limit for the year the employee was excluded. Employer H maintains a 401(k) plan. The plan limits deferrals to the lesser of the deferral limit or the annual additions limit. The plan also permits catch-up contributions. The plan provides for a 60% matching contribution on elective deferrals. For 2006, the deferral limit is $15,000, and the catch-up 17

18 If the employee was entitled to a matching contribution, the employer must make a corrective employer matching contribution equal to the additional matching contribution the employee would have received under the terms of the plan if the employee made a deferral equal to the missed deferral (50% of the catch-up limit for the year). contribution limit is $5,000. Employee R, age 55 is a nonhighly compensated employee who earned $60,000 in 2006 and made elective deferrals totaling $15,000 in For 2006, Employee R was not provided the option to make catch-up contributions. The missed deferral for Employee X is $2,500 (50% of $5,000) and the resulting QNEC is $1,250 (50% of $2,500). In addition, Employee R was entitled to a matching contribution equal to 60% of the missed deferral attributable to the catch-up contribution that the employee would have made if the failure had not occurred. The missed deferral is $2,500 and the corresponding matching contribution is $1,500 (60% of $2,500). Employer H makes a QNEC to the plan on behalf of Employee R equal to $1,250 for the missed deferral, adjusted for earnings. In addition, Employee R makes a required corrective contribution for the additional matching contribution equal to $1,500, adjusted for earnings. 14. Exclusion of an eligible employee from receiving a profit sharing contribution. [Option 1] 15. Exclusion of an eligible employee from receiving a profit The employer must make a corrective contribution for the amount the participant would have received under the plan s allocation formula for that year. The corrective contribution must include lost earnings. If the exclusion of one employee caused another employee to receive more than he would have if the original contribution were properly allocated, the second employee s account does not have to be reduced. The employer must make a corrective contribution for the amount the participant would have received under the plan s allocation formula for that year. The corrective Employer D maintains a profit sharing plan that provides for a nonelective contribution which is allocated in the ratio that each eligible employee s compensation bears to the compensation of all eligible employees for the plan year. Employer D made a contribution for the 2006 plan year. Five eligible employees were excluded from the allocation. Employees who did receive the contribution received 10% of compensation. Most of the employees who received the contribution were NHCEs. If the five excluded employees had been included, all eligible employees would have received an allocation of 9% of compensation. Employer D makes a corrective contribution to the five excluded employees equal to 10% of each employee s compensation, adjusted for earnings. Employer D maintains a profit sharing plan that provides for a nonelective contribution, which is allocated in the ratio that each eligible employee s compensation bears to the compensation of all 18

19 sharing contribution [Option 2] 16. Failure of a 403(b) plan to satisfy the universal availability rule. contribution must include lost earnings. In addition, the account balance of each employee who received more in the original allocation than he would have if the error had not occurred is reduced by that excess amount, adjusted for earnings. With respect to the adjustment for earnings, the following guidelines apply: If most of the employees whose accounts are being reduced are NHCEs and there was an overall investment gain for the period from the date of the original contribution to the correction, the accounts do not have to be adjusted for earnings. If most of the employees whose accounts are being reduced are NHCEs and the accounts are adjusted for earnings, the employer can use the lowest earnings rate for any fund from the period from the original contribution to the correction. If an employee took a distribution before the date of the correction, that employee may keep that distribution if most of the employees who took distributions are NHCEs. If the total amount of contributions to be made for excluded employees is less than the total amount of decreases in accounts, the amount by which employees accounts are reduced is decreased on a pro-rata basis until the reductions equal the contribution amount and the employer does not have to make additional contributions. If the employee was not provided the opportunity to elect and make elective deferrals to a 403(b) plan, in lieu of determining the missed deferral based on the ADP as described above, the missed deferral is equal to the greater of 3% of compensation of the maximum deferral percentage for which the plan sponsor provides a matching contribution rate that is at least as favorable as 100% of the elective deferral made by the employee. 19 eligible employees for the plan year. Employer D made a contribution for the 2006 plan year. Five eligible employees were excluded from the allocation. Employees who did receive the contribution received 10% of compensation. Most of the employees who received the contribution were NHCEs. If the five excluded employees had been included, all eligible employees would have received an allocation of 9% of compensation. The account balance of each excluded employee is increased by 9% of the employee s 2006 compensation, adjusted for earnings. The account balance of each of the eligible employees other than the excluded employees is decreased by 1% of the employee s 2006 compensation, adjusted for earnings. Employer D determines the earnings adjustment using the earnings rate of each eligible employee s excess allocation, using reasonable, consistent assumptions. The total of the reductions in account balances exceeds the total of required increases. The initially determined reductions are decreased pro rata so that the total of the actual reductions in account balances equals the total of the increases in account balances, and Employer D does not make a corrective contribution. Employer H maintains a 403(b) plan. The plan provides for matching contributions equal to 100% of elective deferrals that do not exceed 3% of an employee s compensation. On January 1, 2012, Employee D was eligible to contribute to the plan, but was not given the opportunity to participate. For 2012, Employee D s salary was $30,000. Elective Deferrals: For the missed elective deferral, Employer H must make a QNEC to the plan on behalf of Employee D equal to 50% of Employee D s missed deferral. The missed deferral is equal

Errors and Acceptable Correction Methods, Index

Errors and Acceptable Correction Methods, Index Errors and Acceptable Correction Methods, Index Error Index Error Description SCP Failure to properly provide the minimum top-heavy benefit or contribution to non-key employees. AND VCP Failure to satisfy

More information

Correcting Elective Deferral Failures. Stephen W. Forbes, J.D., LL.M. (taxation) Timothy McCutcheon, Esq., CPA, MBA

Correcting Elective Deferral Failures. Stephen W. Forbes, J.D., LL.M. (taxation) Timothy McCutcheon, Esq., CPA, MBA Correcting Elective Deferral Failures Stephen W. Forbes, J.D., LL.M. (taxation) Timothy McCutcheon, Esq., CPA, MBA Your Presenters Today Stephen W. Forbes, JD, LLM Tim McCutcheon, JD, CPA, MBA 2 Correcting

More information

Common ERISA Compliance Problems and How to Correct Them

Common ERISA Compliance Problems and How to Correct Them Common ERISA Compliance Problems and How to Correct Them Phyllis P. Rimkus, Rimkus Marciano & Associates, Inc. Raymond N. McCabe, Esq. Barclay Damon, LLP Jurisdiction over ERISA Plans Jurisdiction over

More information

Correcting Qualified Plan Errors under EPCRS

Correcting Qualified Plan Errors under EPCRS Correcting Qualified Plan Errors under EPCRS This is just one example of the many online resources Practical Law Company offers. Andy Wang and Jennifer Kobayashi, Wang Kobayashi Austin, LLC with PLC Employee

More information

Correcting 401(k) Testing and Errors The New EPCRS. Charles D. Lockwood, J.D., L.LM ASC Avaneesh Bhaget, Group Manager, IRS

Correcting 401(k) Testing and Errors The New EPCRS. Charles D. Lockwood, J.D., L.LM ASC Avaneesh Bhaget, Group Manager, IRS Correcting 401(k) Testing and Errors The New EPCRS Charles D. Lockwood, J.D., L.LM ASC Avaneesh Bhaget, Group Manager, IRS 1 Charles D. Lockwood, J.D., L.LM ASC Charles D. Lockwood, J.D., and LL.M. (Taxation),

More information

Guide to your Year-End Employer Contribution Report Package

Guide to your Year-End Employer Contribution Report Package ADP Retirement Services Guide to your Year-End Employer Contribution Report Package IMPORTANT DEADLINES: March 1 For Clients with March 15th Corporate Due Date November 30 December 14 Last day for ADP

More information

EPCRS: REV. PROC

EPCRS: REV. PROC The Pension Library ERISA Newsletter Number 2013-1 EPCRS: REV. PROC. 2013-12 Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 2 2 Overview... 2 2.1 SCP.... 2 2.2 VCP.... 4 2.3 Audit CAP.... 5 2.4 Complete and appropriate

More information

IRS. 401(k) Plan Checklist. If you answered No to any of the above questions, you may have made a mistake in the

IRS. 401(k) Plan Checklist. If you answered No to any of the above questions, you may have made a mistake in the 401(k) Plan Checklist This checklist is not a complete description of all For Business Owner s Use plan requirements, and should not be used as a (do not send this worksheet to the IRS) substitute for

More information

tagdata.com EPCRS Case Studies August 3, 2017

tagdata.com EPCRS Case Studies August 3, 2017 tagdata.com EPCRS Case Studies August 3, 2017 Presented by Susan M. Wright, CPA Editor, TAG Correction Programs IRS Rev. Proc. 2016-51 - Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System ( EPCRS ) Rev. Proc.

More information

401(k) Plan Testing 201

401(k) Plan Testing 201 401(k) Plan Testing 201 Kimberly B. Martin, APA, CPC, QPA NIPA, Education Director Bates & Company, Inc., Account Executive Kimberly B. Martin, APA, CPC, QPA NIPA, Education Director Bates & Company, Inc.,

More information

Plan Sponsor Webcast Series

Plan Sponsor Webcast Series Plan Sponsor Webcast Series Roth 401(k) Contributions, Safe Harbor 401(k) Plans and Automatic Enrollment Amy Pocino Kelly Julia L. Bringhurst www.morganlewis.com May 5, 2010 Roth 401(k) Contributions 2

More information

Guide to your Year End Compliance Test Package

Guide to your Year End Compliance Test Package ADP Retirement Services Guide to your Year End Compliance Test Package Refer to page 4 for important deadlines. ADP, the ADP logo and ADP A more human resource are registered trademarks of ADP, LLC. All

More information

Employee Benefit Plans. Section 401(k) Requirements. Explanation No.

Employee Benefit Plans. Section 401(k) Requirements. Explanation No. Employee Benefit Plans Explanation No. 12 Section 401(k) Requirements The purpose of Worksheet Number 12 (Form 9002) and this explanation is to identify major problems that relate to plans that include

More information

PART I. INTRODUCTION TO EMPLOYEE PLANS COMPLIANCE RESOLUTION SYSTEM SECTION 2. EFFECT OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE ON PROGRAMS

PART I. INTRODUCTION TO EMPLOYEE PLANS COMPLIANCE RESOLUTION SYSTEM SECTION 2. EFFECT OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE ON PROGRAMS Rev. Proc. 2016-51 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I. INTRODUCTION TO EMPLOYEE PLANS COMPLIANCE RESOLUTION SYSTEM SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND OVERVIEW.01 Purpose.02 General principles underlying EPCRS.03 Overview SECTION

More information

Title Goes Here. More Powerful Medicine For Your Retirement Plans The New and Improved EPCRS (Revenue Procedure )

Title Goes Here. More Powerful Medicine For Your Retirement Plans The New and Improved EPCRS (Revenue Procedure ) Title Goes Here More Powerful Medicine For Your Retirement Plans The New and Improved EPCRS (Revenue Procedure 2013-12) April 15, 2013 Indiana Benefits Conference Presented by: David Rosner david.rosner@ogletreedeakins.com

More information

Understanding Nondiscrimination Testing

Understanding Nondiscrimination Testing Understanding Nondiscrimination Testing A WHITE PAPER BY Pentegra Retirement Services 2 Enterprise Drive, Suite 48 Shelton, CT 6484-4694 8.872.3473 tel 23.925.674 fax www.pentegra.com Nondiscrimination

More information

Background. 401(k) Plans Automatic Enrollment & Safe Harbor after PPA

Background. 401(k) Plans Automatic Enrollment & Safe Harbor after PPA 401(k) Plans Automatic Enrollment & Safe Harbor after PPA Pam Thein Partner, Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP Kim Wright - Vice President, Regional Director, Wachovia Retirement Services September 10,

More information

401(k) Basics Webcast

401(k) Basics Webcast 401(k) Basics Webcast Lisa H. Barton Elizabeth Kennedy www.morganlewis.com February 16, 2010 What Is a 401(k) Plan? A qualified cash or deferred arrangement within a tax-qualified profit sharing or stock

More information

Test it, Find it, Fix it!

Test it, Find it, Fix it! Test it, Find it, Fix it! 2015 MACPA EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN CONFERENCE Presented by Kathryn Petrillo, Mark Flanagan & Jennifer Downs Introductions Session format Questions 2 The Plan Document What We Test.

More information

DEFINED CONTRIBUTION VOLUME SUBMITTER PLAN AND TRUST BASIC PLAN DOCUMENT [DC-BPD #04]

DEFINED CONTRIBUTION VOLUME SUBMITTER PLAN AND TRUST BASIC PLAN DOCUMENT [DC-BPD #04] DEFINED CONTRIBUTION VOLUME SUBMITTER PLAN AND TRUST BASIC PLAN DOCUMENT [DC-BPD #04] TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 PLAN DEFINITIONS 1.01 Account.... 1 1.02 Account Balance... 1 1.03 ACP Test (Actual Contribution

More information

Introductions. Test it, Find it, Fix it! Session format Questions 2015 MACPA EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN CONFERENCE

Introductions. Test it, Find it, Fix it! Session format Questions 2015 MACPA EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN CONFERENCE Test it, Find it, Fix it! 2015 MACPA EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN CONFERENCE Presented by Kathryn Petrillo, Mark Flanagan & Jennifer Downs Session format Questions Introductions 2 1 The Plan Document What We

More information

401(k) Plan Executive Summary January 2018

401(k) Plan Executive Summary January 2018 401(k) Plan Executive Summary January 2018 3000 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 130 Roseville, CA 95661 Tel (916) 773-3480 Fax (916) 773-3484 6400 Canoga Avenue, Suite 250 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Tel (818) 716-0111

More information

Plan Administration Manual

Plan Administration Manual Plan Administration Manual P a g e 1 Thank you for choosing American United Life Insurance Company (AUL), a OneAmerica company, as the funding vehicle and administrative services provider for your retirement

More information

Employee Benefit Plan Section 401(k) Requirements (Worksheet Number 12 Determination of Qualification)

Employee Benefit Plan Section 401(k) Requirements (Worksheet Number 12 Determination of Qualification) Form 9002 (November 2006) See Explanation Number 12 (Rev. 11-2006) for guidance in completing this form. Employee Benefit Plan Section 401(k) Requirements (Worksheet Number 12 Determination of Qualification)

More information

Cash or Deferred Arrangement (CODA) Listing of Required Modifications and Information Package (LRMs)

Cash or Deferred Arrangement (CODA) Listing of Required Modifications and Information Package (LRMs) (10-2017) Cash or Deferred Arrangement (CODA) Listing of Required Modifications and Information Package (LRMs) (For use with Pre-approved Plans intending to satisfy the requirements of Code 401(k) and

More information

Correcting Administrative Errors in DC Plans. Jane Armstrong, Esq., Phelps Dunbar LLP

Correcting Administrative Errors in DC Plans. Jane Armstrong, Esq., Phelps Dunbar LLP Correcting Administrative Errors in DC Plans Jane Armstrong, Esq., Phelps Dunbar LLP Jane Armstrong, Esq., Partner, Phelps Dunbar, LLP Jane Armstrong is a partner at Phelps Dunbar LLP, a regional law firm

More information

Administrative Guidelines

Administrative Guidelines making it personal Administrative Guidelines for plan sponsors every step of the way GUIDELINES TO ASSIST YOU WITH PLAN ADMINISTRATION OneAmerica is the marketing name for the companies of OneAmerica 2

More information

DC-2: Defined Contribution Administrative Issues Compliance Issues

DC-2: Defined Contribution Administrative Issues Compliance Issues DC-2: Defined Contribution Administrative Issues Compliance Issues Course Over the past 20 years, 401(k) plans have become an enormously popular plan design. These plans permit pre-tax retirement savings

More information

PENSION EDUCATOR SERIES GLOSSARY

PENSION EDUCATOR SERIES GLOSSARY PENSION EDUCATOR SERIES GLOSSARY 2 1% Owner An employee who owns more than 1% of the outstanding stock or more than 1% of the total combined voting power of all stock in a corporation; or more than 1%

More information

Maintaining your 403(b) plan s tax-favored status under EPCRS

Maintaining your 403(b) plan s tax-favored status under EPCRS Maintaining your 403(b) plan s tax-favored status under EPCRS Managing a retirement plan involves navigating the often complex legal requirements associated with 403(b) plans. Even the most diligent plan

More information

Entrust. New. Instructions STEP STEP STEP STEP. SUBMIT BY MAIL The Entrust Group SUBMIT BY FAX

Entrust. New. Instructions STEP STEP STEP STEP. SUBMIT BY MAIL The Entrust Group SUBMIT BY FAX Entrust t Individual 401(k) Plan New Account Kit (Part 1) Instructions STEP 1 Review Plan Documents Review Plan and Trust Document and Adoption Agreement (watermark version), as well as the Opinion Letter

More information

Some important limitations that must be taken into consideration with plan design (limits described below are 2019 limits and do change for COLA):

Some important limitations that must be taken into consideration with plan design (limits described below are 2019 limits and do change for COLA): PLAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS - INITIAL PLAN DESIGN Objective: Optimize contributions for owners/partners Provide options for plans with multiple owners/partners to allow each owner/partner to determine their

More information

NON-STANDARDIZED SHORT FORM PROTOTYPE ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR MASS-SUBMITTER PROTOTYPE SHORT FORM CASH OR DEFERRED PROFIT SHARING PLAN

NON-STANDARDIZED SHORT FORM PROTOTYPE ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR MASS-SUBMITTER PROTOTYPE SHORT FORM CASH OR DEFERRED PROFIT SHARING PLAN NON-STANDARDIZED SHORT FORM PROTOTYPE ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR MASS-SUBMITTER PROTOTYPE SHORT FORM CASH OR DEFERRED PROFIT SHARING PLAN 03-007 NON-STANDARDIZED SHORT FORM PROTOTYPE ADOPTION AGREEMENT

More information

Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System: Revenue Procedure

Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System: Revenue Procedure What Can Go Wrong, but More Importantly, How to Correct It! Monday, April 29, 2013 Barbara M. Clough, QPA, QKA, Director of Plan Administration, Blue Ridge ESOP Associates Avaneesh Bhagat, IRS Employee

More information

Comprehensive Guide to Yearly Compliance Activities

Comprehensive Guide to Yearly Compliance Activities 1 Comprehensive Guide to Yearly Compliance Activities Table of Contents Plan Sponsor Webstation (PSW )... 3 Contacting Testing & Reporting... 4 What is Nondiscrimination Testing?... 5 What Services Does

More information

403(b) IDP Employer Contributions & Elective Deferrals Plan 05/15/2017 Checklist

403(b) IDP Employer Contributions & Elective Deferrals Plan 05/15/2017 Checklist 403(b) IDP Employer Contributions & Elective Deferrals Plan 05/15/2017 1. EMPLOYER; PLAN (1.27; 1.50). Name: Employer's Address: (Street - Physical not P.O. Box) 5. EFFECTIVE DATE (1.21). The Employer

More information

Helping you fulfill your fiduciary duties

Helping you fulfill your fiduciary duties A Fiduciary Planning Guide for Plan Sponsors Helping you fulfill your fiduciary duties MassMutual s Regulatory Advisory Services 2016 Calendar Contents Defined Contribution Plans 2 January March 4 April

More information

Changes to the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (Revenue Procedure ) February 21, IRS Phone Forum-Retirement Plans

Changes to the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (Revenue Procedure ) February 21, IRS Phone Forum-Retirement Plans Changes to the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (Revenue Procedure 2013-12) February 21, 2013- IRS Phone Forum-Retirement Plans Revenue Procedure 2013-12 PRESENTED BY: Yan Mak Rev. Proc. 2013-12

More information

TYPES OF QUALIFIED PLANS

TYPES OF QUALIFIED PLANS Chapter 2 by Richard A. Naegele, J.D., M.A. Wickens, Herzer, Panza, Cook & Batista Co. 35765 Chester Road Avon, OH 44011-1262 Phone: (440) 695-8074 Email: RNaegele@WickensLaw.com Website: www.wickenslaw.com

More information

BECK AUTO SALES, INC. 401(K) PLAN. SAFE HARBOR NOTIFICATION TO ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES (includes Automatic Contribution Arrangement)

BECK AUTO SALES, INC. 401(K) PLAN. SAFE HARBOR NOTIFICATION TO ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES (includes Automatic Contribution Arrangement) BECK AUTO SALES, INC. 401(K) PLAN SAFE HARBOR NOTIFICATION TO ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES (includes Automatic Contribution Arrangement) This is an annual notice and only applies to the Plan Year beginning on January

More information

EMPLOYER. Helping you fulfill your fiduciary duties. MassMutual s Regulatory Advisory Services 2019 Calendar for non-calendar year DC and DB plans

EMPLOYER. Helping you fulfill your fiduciary duties. MassMutual s Regulatory Advisory Services 2019 Calendar for non-calendar year DC and DB plans EMPLOYER Helping you fulfill your fiduciary duties MassMutual s Regulatory Advisory Services 2019 Calendar for non-calendar year DC and DB plans TABLE OF CONTENTS Defined Contribution Plans... 2 January

More information

ACCUDRAFT PROTOTYPE DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT PLAN BASIC PLAN # 01

ACCUDRAFT PROTOTYPE DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT PLAN BASIC PLAN # 01 ACCUDRAFT PROTOTYPE DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT PLAN BASIC PLAN # 01 DC Basic Plan #01 July 2008 Table of Contents Article 1...2 Definitions...2 1.1 ACP Test....2 1.2 ACP Safe Harbor Matching Contribution....2

More information

2011 Year-End Compliance Information

2011 Year-End Compliance Information 2011 Year-End Compliance Information Compliance testing and reporting are annual requirements that are part of the ongoing qualified tax status of a retirement plan. American United Life Insurance Company

More information

Individual 401(k) Basic Plan Document

Individual 401(k) Basic Plan Document Individual 401(k) Basic Plan Document Connect with Vanguard > 800-337-6241 1 This page is intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFINITIONS 2009 RMD... 1 ACP Test Safe Harbor Matching Contributions...

More information

Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System: Revenue Procedure

Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System: Revenue Procedure Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System: Revenue Procedure 2013-12 Thelma Diaz IRS Employee Plans Voluntary Compliance Thelma.C.Diaz@irs.gov EPCRS Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS)

More information

The SALARY DEFERRAL AGREEMENT should also be provided so that a Participant can elect an alternative amount of compensation to defer.

The SALARY DEFERRAL AGREEMENT should also be provided so that a Participant can elect an alternative amount of compensation to defer. Explanation of Annual Contribution Notices TO THE ADMINISTRATOR The following administrative forms have been included because they are either required under the Plan or by law, or they are necessary to

More information

EPCRS Part I - Directly Resolving Plan Problems. Avannesh K. Bhagat, IRS Robert M. Richter, J.D., LL.M., VP, FIS Relius

EPCRS Part I - Directly Resolving Plan Problems. Avannesh K. Bhagat, IRS Robert M. Richter, J.D., LL.M., VP, FIS Relius EPCRS Part I - Directly Resolving Plan Problems Avannesh K. Bhagat, IRS Robert M. Richter, J.D., LL.M., VP, FIS Relius Robert Richter, J.D., LL.M., Vice President, FIS Robert M. Richter, J.D., LL.M. is

More information

EPCRS Part I - Directly Resolving Plan Problems

EPCRS Part I - Directly Resolving Plan Problems EPCRS Part I - Directly Resolving Plan Problems Avannesh K. Bhagat, IRS Robert M. Richter, J.D., LL.M., VP, FIS Relius Robert Richter, J.D., LL.M., Vice President, FIS Robert M. Richter, J.D., LL.M. is

More information

MULTIPLE EMPLOYER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT

MULTIPLE EMPLOYER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT MULTIPLE EMPLOYER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT MSABC Multiple Employer 401(k) Plan An Employer, by executing this Multiple Employer Participation Agreement, elects to become a Participating Employer in the

More information

403(b) PLAN BASIC PLAN DOCUMENT

403(b) PLAN BASIC PLAN DOCUMENT 403 PLAN BASIC PLAN DOCUMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 PLAN DEFINITIONS 1.01 Account... 1 1.02 Account Balance... 1 1.03 Accumulated Benefit... 1 1.04 Actual Contribution Percentage Test (ACP Test)...

More information

SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION January 1, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO YOUR PLAN What kind of Plan is this?... 1 What information does this Summary provide?...

More information

SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION Effective January 2017 Table of Contents Article 1... Introduction Article 2... General Plan Information and Key Definitions Article 3... Description of Plan Article 4... Plan

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS

ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS **Please review the assignment of responsibility for the administration of the plan and indicate any changes. 1. IDENTITY OF RESPONSIBLE PARTIES 1. Identity of People in Each Header Category 2. Point person

More information

TRISTAR PENSION CONSULTING

TRISTAR PENSION CONSULTING TRISTAR PENSION CONSULTING 2/1/2006 Responsibilities of a Plan Sponsor Introduction Allocation of Duties Employee Notifications Plan Summaries Beneficiary Forms Deferral Elections Plan Contributions Safe

More information

Back to the Basics of 401(k) Administration: A Review and Update on Compensation, Loan and Hardship Withdrawal Issues. Presented by: Heidi A.

Back to the Basics of 401(k) Administration: A Review and Update on Compensation, Loan and Hardship Withdrawal Issues. Presented by: Heidi A. Back to the Basics of 401(k) Administration: A Review and Update on Compensation, Loan and Hardship Withdrawal Issues Presented by: Heidi A. Lyon Compensation What We ll Cover Review of compensation concepts

More information

VOLUME SUBMITTER ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR CASH OR DEFERRED PROFIT SHARING PLAN

VOLUME SUBMITTER ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR CASH OR DEFERRED PROFIT SHARING PLAN VOLUME SUBMITTER ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR CASH OR DEFERRED PROFIT SHARING PLAN 12-001. VOLUME SUBMITTER ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR CASH OR DEFERRED PROFIT SHARING PLAN The DATAIR Cash or

More information

TAG Frequently Asked Questions. Presented By: Susan M. Wright, CPA, APM

TAG Frequently Asked Questions. Presented By: Susan M. Wright, CPA, APM TAG Frequently Asked Questions Presented By: Susan M. Wright, CPA, APM About TAG Ability to ask retirement plan questions our TAG specialists have, on average, over 25 years of experience Searchable FAQ

More information

EPCRS: Revenue Procedures

EPCRS: Revenue Procedures Tax Exempt and Government Entities: Employee Plans Update to the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS) EPCRS: Revenue Procedures Revenue Procedure 2013-12 Revenue Procedures 2015-27 and 2015-28

More information

CYCLE E. Form 9416 (March 2010) For IRS Use

CYCLE E. Form 9416 (March 2010) For IRS Use Form 9416 (March 2010) For IRS Use 1011, 1102, 1103 II.a.(i), (ii) Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service Date Employee Plans Deficiency Checksheet Attachment #11 Section 401(m) Requirements Please

More information

403(b) ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

403(b) ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 403(b) ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 403(b) Plan Employer Contributions and Elective Deferrals The undersigned Eligible Employer, by executing this Adoption Agreement, elects

More information

Options for Retirement Benefits OPTIONS FOR RETIREMENT BENEFITS. Charles M. Lax

Options for Retirement Benefits OPTIONS FOR RETIREMENT BENEFITS. Charles M. Lax OPTIONS FOR RETIREMENT BENEFITS Charles M. Lax INTRODUCTION Your Name Your Company Your Position Your Companies Retirement Plan(s) 2 WHAT S COMMON IN MOST QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLANS? Tax Benefits Income

More information

BEAVER TOYOTA 401(K) PLAN. NOTIFICATION TO ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES (includes Automatic Contribution Arrangement)

BEAVER TOYOTA 401(K) PLAN. NOTIFICATION TO ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES (includes Automatic Contribution Arrangement) BEAVER TOYOTA 401(K) PLAN NOTIFICATION TO ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES (includes Automatic Contribution Arrangement) This is an annual notice and only applies to the Plan Year beginning on January 1, 2019. This

More information

401(k) Plan Design Checklist

401(k) Plan Design Checklist 401(k) Plan Design Checklist 250 State Street Mobile, AL 36603 877-401-5100 251-436-0800 Table of Contents Summary...3-4 A. General Information...5 B. Eligibility...6-7 C. Compensation...7 D. Employee

More information

Roth Is On the Rise William C. Grossman, ERPA, QPA, APA, MBA

Roth Is On the Rise William C. Grossman, ERPA, QPA, APA, MBA Roth Is On the Rise William C. Grossman, ERPA, QPA, APA, MBA Agenda Conversion Background In-plan Roth Conversions Designated Roth and Roth IRA Plan Design Concept: Add After-tax to Increase Roth Contribution

More information

Administrative guidelines and activity schedule for plan sponsors

Administrative guidelines and activity schedule for plan sponsors making it personal Administrative guidelines and activity schedule for plan sponsors every step of the way Guidelines to assist you with plan administration Products and financial services provided by

More information

STRATEGIC PLAN DESIGN: SMART SOLUTIONS FOR OVERCOMING FAILED ADP/ACP TESTING

STRATEGIC PLAN DESIGN: SMART SOLUTIONS FOR OVERCOMING FAILED ADP/ACP TESTING STRATEGIC PLAN DESIGN: SMART SOLUTIONS FOR OVERCOMING FAILED ADP/ACP TESTING Q&A FROM THE JULY 19, 2018 WEBINAR Does Newport Group offer combined qualified and non-qualified plan solutions that can provide

More information

ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR FIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC STANDARDIZED 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN

ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR FIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC STANDARDIZED 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR FIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC STANDARDIZED 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN CAUTION: Failure to properly fill out this Adoption Agreement may result in disqualification of the Plan. Standardized

More information

EPCRS: Hot Topics & Rev. Proc. Updates Rules of the Road

EPCRS: Hot Topics & Rev. Proc. Updates Rules of the Road EPCRS: Hot Topics & Rev. Proc. Updates Rules of the Road Presented by Jewell Lim Esposito, Esq. Jackson Lewis & Adam C. Pozek, ERPA, QPA, CPFA DWC ERISA Consultants 1 Why Do We Care? EPCRS A History APRS

More information

RESOURCE. Plan Sponsor Guide. saving : investing : planning. For plan sponsor use only. Not for public distribution.

RESOURCE. Plan Sponsor Guide. saving : investing : planning. For plan sponsor use only. Not for public distribution. RESOURCE Plan Sponsor Guide saving : investing : planning Contents Chapter 1: Introduction... 5 Overview... 6 Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)... 6 Defined Contribution Plans... 7 Defined

More information

Make ADP/ACP Testing Great Again. Steve Riordan, CPC, QPA, QKA Director of Testing and Reporting Services Fidelity Investments

Make ADP/ACP Testing Great Again. Steve Riordan, CPC, QPA, QKA Director of Testing and Reporting Services Fidelity Investments Make ADP/ACP Testing Great Again Steve Riordan, CPC, QPA, QKA Director of Testing and Reporting Services Fidelity Investments Steve.Riordan@fmr.com 1 Agenda ADP/ACP Testing Overview Compensation Disaggregation

More information

SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION FOR. Richmond Public Schools 403(b) Retirement Plan

SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION FOR. Richmond Public Schools 403(b) Retirement Plan SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION FOR Richmond Public Schools 403(b) Retirement Plan 3-1-2014 Table of Contents Article 1... Introduction Article 2... General Plan Information and Key Definitions Article 3... Description

More information

General Information for 401k Plan Sponsor

General Information for 401k Plan Sponsor General Information for 401k Plan Sponsor Welcome to our 401k Guide for the Plan Sponsor! The information contained on this site was designed and developed by various governmental agencies, and compiled

More information

TEAMHEALTH 401(K) PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

TEAMHEALTH 401(K) PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION TEAMHEALTH 401(K) PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO YOUR PLAN What kind of Plan is this?... 1 What information does this Summary provide?... 1 ARTICLE I PARTICIPATION IN THE

More information

Volume Submitter 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan Adoption Agreement

Volume Submitter 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan Adoption Agreement Volume Submitter 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan Adoption Agreement EMPLOYER INFORMATION Name of Adopting Employer STRATFOR ENTERPRISES LLC Address _ 221 W 6TH ST STE 400 City AUSTIN State TX Zip 78701-3426

More information

QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION SUPER SIMPLIFIED STANDARD INDIVIDUAL 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN Plan Name: Your Employer has adopted the qualified retirement plan named above ( the Plan

More information

401(k) Plan Testing 101. Kimberly B. Martin, APA, CPC, QPA NIPA, Education Director Bates & Company, Inc., Account Executive

401(k) Plan Testing 101. Kimberly B. Martin, APA, CPC, QPA NIPA, Education Director Bates & Company, Inc., Account Executive 401(k) Plan Testing 101 Kimberly B. Martin, APA, CPC, QPA NIPA, Education Director Bates & Company, Inc., Account Executive Kimberly B. Martin, APA, CPC, QPA NIPA, Education Director Bates & Company, Inc.,

More information

General Information for 401k Plan Participant

General Information for 401k Plan Participant General Information for 401k Plan Participant Welcome to our 401(k) Guide for the Plan Participant! The information contained on this site was designed and developed by various governmental agencies, and

More information

DESCRIPTION OF THE CHAIRMAN S MARK OF THE RETIREMENT ENHANCEMENT AND SAVINGS ACT OF 2016

DESCRIPTION OF THE CHAIRMAN S MARK OF THE RETIREMENT ENHANCEMENT AND SAVINGS ACT OF 2016 DESCRIPTION OF THE CHAIRMAN S MARK OF THE RETIREMENT ENHANCEMENT AND SAVINGS ACT OF 2016 Scheduled for Markup by the SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE on September 21, 2016 Prepared by the Staff of the JOINT

More information

QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLAN AND TRUST. Volume Submitter Summary Plan Description Booklet

QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLAN AND TRUST. Volume Submitter Summary Plan Description Booklet QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLAN AND TRUST Volume Submitter Summary Plan Description Booklet Introduction Your Employer has adopted an Employee benefit plan designed to help you meet your financial needs during

More information

2016 PLAN SPONSOR BASICS 401(k) ISSUES. Presenters: Lisa Barton and Elizabeth Kennedy November 9, 2016

2016 PLAN SPONSOR BASICS 401(k) ISSUES. Presenters: Lisa Barton and Elizabeth Kennedy November 9, 2016 2016 PLAN SPONSOR BASICS 401(k) ISSUES Presenters: Lisa Barton and Elizabeth Kennedy November 9, 2016 2016 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP SECTION 01 WHAT WE WILL COVER Agenda Description of Correction Principles

More information

ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR FIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC STANDARDIZED MONEY PURCHASE PLAN

ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR FIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC STANDARDIZED MONEY PURCHASE PLAN ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR FIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC STANDARDIZED MONEY PURCHASE PLAN CAUTION: Failure to properly fill out this Adoption Agreement may result in disqualification of the Plan. EMPLOYER INFORMATION

More information

FINAL COPYRIGHT 2015 LGUTEF RETIREMENT ISSUES

FINAL COPYRIGHT 2015 LGUTEF RETIREMENT ISSUES RETIREMENT ISSUES 3 Issue 1: Checklists for Retirement Planning....... 71 Issue 2: Form 1099-R.......... 79 Issue 3: Nonqualified Annuities................ 83 Issue 4: Reverse Mortgages.... 91 Issue 5:

More information

Auto Enrollment: Best Practices and Common Mistakes. Robert M. Richter, Esq., APM Vice President FIS Relius Wealth and Management

Auto Enrollment: Best Practices and Common Mistakes. Robert M. Richter, Esq., APM Vice President FIS Relius Wealth and Management Auto Enrollment: Best Practices and Common Mistakes Robert M. Richter, Esq., APM Vice President FIS Relius Wealth and Management 1 2 Automatic Enrollment Passive approach You can defer or not: your choice

More information

IRS Audits: A Necessary Evil. Ed Salyers, QPA, CPA

IRS Audits: A Necessary Evil. Ed Salyers, QPA, CPA IRS Audits: A Necessary Evil Ed Salyers, QPA, CPA ed.salyers@cpa.com 1 Agenda Why Employee Plans (EP) audits are necessary Identify strategic EP changes Impact of audit changes Issues by plan type Employee

More information

IT ISN T THAT BAD: USING SELF- CORRECTION METHODS APPROPRIATELY. Pamela D. Perdue Summers, Compton & Wells, LLC.

IT ISN T THAT BAD: USING SELF- CORRECTION METHODS APPROPRIATELY. Pamela D. Perdue Summers, Compton & Wells, LLC. IT ISN T THAT BAD: USING SELF- CORRECTION METHODS APPROPRIATELY Pamela D. Perdue Summers, Compton & Wells, LLC pperdue@summerscomptonwells.com Learning Objectives 1. Learn when you can use Self- Correction

More information

403(b) PLANS A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEMS

403(b) PLANS A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEMS 403(b) PLANS A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEMS January 2017 This guide is not intended and may not be used to avoid tax penalties, and was prepared to support the promotion or marketing of the matters

More information

Presented By: Terry Smith CPC, QPA, QKA Assistant Vice President, Account Manager Amanda Wielk CEBS Assistant Vice President, Account Manager

Presented By: Terry Smith CPC, QPA, QKA Assistant Vice President, Account Manager Amanda Wielk CEBS Assistant Vice President, Account Manager Presented By: Terry Smith CPC, QPA, QKA Assistant Vice President, Account Manager Amanda Wielk CEBS Assistant Vice President, Account Manager Today s Agenda Eligibility Trends and Considerations Roth 401(k)

More information

BRIGHT WOOD 401(K) SAVINGS AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

BRIGHT WOOD 401(K) SAVINGS AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION BRIGHT WOOD 401(K) SAVINGS AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION January 1, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO YOUR PLAN What kind of Plan is this?... 1 What information does this Summary

More information

How to Understand Your Compliance Testing Summary

How to Understand Your Compliance Testing Summary How to Understand Your Compliance Testing Summary Abbreviations and acronyms used in this summary: ACP Actual Contribution Percentage test ADP Actual Deferral Percentage test DOL Department of Labor HCE

More information

ASPIRUS, INC. RETIREMENT PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

ASPIRUS, INC. RETIREMENT PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION ASPIRUS, INC. RETIREMENT PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO YOUR PLAN ARTICLE I PARTICIPATION IN THE PLAN Am I eligible to participate in the Plan?...5 When am I eligible to

More information

SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO YOUR PLAN What kind of Plan is this?... 1 What information does this Summary provide?... 1 ARTICLE

More information

1/6/2016. Compliance Issues: When Molehills become Mountains. 1. Reporting or using incorrect compensation

1/6/2016. Compliance Issues: When Molehills become Mountains. 1. Reporting or using incorrect compensation Compliance Issues: When Molehills become Mountains Presented by: Marilyn Ryding, AIF Elizabeth Hopkins, Department of Labor 1. Reporting or using incorrect compensation Compliance testing may be wrong

More information

FILICE INSURANCE 401(K) EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

FILICE INSURANCE 401(K) EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION FILICE INSURANCE 401(K) EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO YOUR PLAN What kind of Plan is this?...1 What information does this Summary provide?...1 ARTICLE

More information

Compliance Tests What Are They and How Do I Interpret the Results? By: Janice Herrin & Melissa Howard, CPC, QPA, QKA

Compliance Tests What Are They and How Do I Interpret the Results? By: Janice Herrin & Melissa Howard, CPC, QPA, QKA Compliance Tests What Are They and How Do I Interpret the Results? By: Janice Herrin & Melissa Howard, CPC, QPA, QKA Agenda Prerequisites Highly Compensated Employees (HCEs) Key Employees 410b Coverage

More information

SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION FOR. Florida Tech Retirement Plan

SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION FOR. Florida Tech Retirement Plan SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION FOR 1-1-2018 Table of Contents Article 1... Introduction Article 2... General Plan Information and Key Definitions Article 3... Description of Plan Article 4... Plan Contributions

More information

ASPPA s Quarterly Journal for Actuaries, Consultants, Administrators and Other Retirement Plan Professionals

ASPPA s Quarterly Journal for Actuaries, Consultants, Administrators and Other Retirement Plan Professionals SPRING 2010 :: VOL 40, NO 2 ASPPAJournal ASPPA s Quarterly Journal for Actuaries, Consultants, Administrators and Other Retirement Plan Professionals Back-to-Basics: Average Deferral Percentage Test by

More information

Plan Administrator Operating Guidelines

Plan Administrator Operating Guidelines Plan Administrator Operating Guidelines Employee Benefit Division P.O. Box 417014 Kansas City, MO 64141-7014 800-821-7194 April 2002 2002 UMB Financial Corporation Table of Contents FORWARD I. Plan Administrator

More information

KELC 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

KELC 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION KELC 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO YOUR PLAN What kind of Plan is this?... 1 What information does this Summary provide?... 1 ARTICLE I PARTICIPATION IN

More information

IDP Profit Sharing 05/15/2017 Checklist

IDP Profit Sharing 05/15/2017 Checklist DOCUMENT PACKAGE a. Volume Submitter Plan and Trust as one document b. Volume Submitter Plan and Trust as separate documents c. Volume Submitter Plan Only-No Trust: (select one) Separate trust specifically

More information

Compliance Coordination

Compliance Coordination Compliance Coordination Kim Martin, APA, CPC, QPA NIPA, Education Director Bates & Company, Inc., Account Executive 1 Compliance Tests Elective Deferral Limits ADP & ACP Tests 414(s) Compensation Test

More information