NECA Fuels Conference Coralie Carter Sculley. September 28, 2016

Transcription

1 NECA Fuels Conference Coralie Carter Sculley September 28, 2016

2 Forward-Looking Statements/ Non-GAAP Financial Measures Forward-Looking Statements / Non-GAAP Financial Measures This presentation includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of These forward-looking statements are identified as any statement that does not relate strictly to historical or current facts. In particular, statements, express or implied, concerning future actions, conditions or events, future operating results or the ability to generate revenues, income or cash flow or to pay dividends are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Future actions, conditions or events and future results of operations of Kinder Morgan, Inc. may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond Kinder Morgan's ability to control or predict. These statements are necessarily based upon various assumptions involving judgments with respect to the future, including, among others, the timing and extent of changes in the supply of and demand for the products we transport and handle; national, international, regional and local economic, competitive and regulatory conditions and developments; the timing and success of business development efforts; technological developments; capital and credit markets conditions; inflation rates; interest rates; the political and economic stability of oil producing nations; energy markets; weather conditions; environmental conditions; business, regulatory and legal decisions; terrorism, including cyber-attacks; and other uncertainties. There is no assurance that any of the actions, events or results of the forward-looking statements will occur, or if any of them do, what impact they will have on our results of operations or financial condition. Because of these uncertainties, you are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statement. Please read "Risk Factors" and "Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and our subsequently filed Exchange Act reports, which are available through the SEC s EDGAR system at and on our website at We use non-generally accepted accounting principles ( non-gaap ) financial measures in this presentation. Our reconciliation of non-gaap financial measures to comparable GAAP measures can be found in the Appendix to this presentation. These non-gaap measures should not be considered an alternative to GAAP financial measures. 2

3 Unparalleled Asset Footprint World class asset footprint: Largest natural gas pipeline network in North America Own an interest in / operate over 69,000 miles of natural gas pipeline Connected to every important U.S. natural gas resource play, including: Eagle Ford, Marcellus, Utica, Permian, Bakken and Haynesville Largest independent transporter of petroleum products in North America Transport ~2.1 MMBbl/d (a) Largest CO 2 transporter in North America Transport ~1.2 Bcf/d of CO 2 (a) Largest independent terminal operator in North America Own an interest in / operate ~180 liquids / dry bulk terminals ~152 MMBbls of liquids capacity Handle ~65 MMtons of dry bulk products (a) Strong Jones Act shipping position Only Oilsands pipeline serving West Coast Transports ~300 MBbl/d to Vancouver / Washington State; proposed expansion takes capacity to 890 MBbl/d Footprint drives growth project pipeline: $13.5 billion 5-year growth capex program Secured by long-term contracts Attractive, fee-based returns (a) 2016 budget.

4 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Overview System Overview 11,900 miles of pipeline 9 Bcf/d design capacity 96 Bcf of storage capacity >500 firm transportation customers Utica Shale Gas Canada New England Marcellus Shale Gas Long-term Growth Drivers Demand growth across system Abundant & Growing Supply Eagle Ford, Haynesville, Fayetteville, Barnett, Marcellus & Utica Haynesville Shale Gas EagleFord Shale Gas Mexico LNG Export Southeast 4

5 TGP Northeast Projects Market-Driven Dth/d In-Service Connecticut Expansion 72,100 Nov-17 Triad - Invenergy 180,000 Nov-18 Exelon - Handsome Lake 60,000 Dec-16 Supply-Driven Dth/d In-Service Niagara Expansion 158,000 Nov-15 Susquehanna West 145,000 Nov-17 Orion 135,000 Jun-18 5

6 Connecticut Expansion Project Market-driven Project Demand growth in Connecticut Capacity: 72,100 Dth/d Customers: Southern Connecticut, Connecticut Natural, Yankee Gas In-service (Est): November 2017 Project Status: FERC Certificate received March 11, 2016 MA 401 permit received June 29 appeals process on-going Resolution of Article 97 lands in MA (July 29) NY 404 permit received September 8 Working to secure few remaining permits Anticipate construction Spring 2017 Project Scope: miles of pipeline loop

7 Changing Landscape Overview Northeast Supply continues to grow TGP (and others) have defined projects to move incremental supply to market Continued / expanded reversal of pipeline grid Limited ability for New England to access incremental supply without expansion Northeast Supply Growth Increased exports to Canada Power generation growth Midwest markets (via Rex/others) LNG Exports (Gulf Coast) Southeast Demand Growth Mexico Demand growth 7

8 Need for NE Infrastructure Increased Throughput Capacity vs Scheduled Volumes Segment 321 (NY into CT Flows) All Time High Power Burns Segment 245 (NY into MA Flows) Power Gen Peak Days Top Date Dth Zone 5 #2 7/7/ ,524 Zone 6 #1 8/11/ ,040 System Wide 8/11/2016 2,656,592

9 Northeastern Infrastructure Hurdles Environmental Opposition. Change the message Concerted outreach Regulatory Uncertainty State Permitting Legislative/Political EDC Proceedings Credit Concerns Security Issues

10 The Truth About Emissions Source: INGA "Natural gas being abundant has been a game changer in our ability to really move forward with pollution reduction. EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy

11 Environmental Leadership: Join the Debate Methane Emissions: One Future ( DOE, PHMSA Joint Interagency Gas Storage Safety Task Force Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC) DOE s National Renewable Energy Laboratory Industrial & Business Trade Associations WHAT CAN YOU DO?

12 Path Forward Growing Execution Risk Increased Costs Developing Supply - Willing Markets Reassess New England Needs Smaller Projects