Deal Stats Transaction Survey
|
|
- Sophia Douglas
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 January June 2016 Summary Report Prepared by Brady Cary and Robert Regis, ASA of Columbia Financial Advisors, Inc. 12/31/16 A Publication of the AM&AA Market Research Committee Market Research Committee Report No Deal Stats Survey Sponsors Business ValueXpress ACT Capital Advisors, LLC Columbia Financial Advisors, Inc. AM&AA AM&AA info@amaaonline.org
2 Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors January June 2016 Summary Report December 2016 Executive Summary The (Survey) is designed to provide insight into transactions completed in the first half of 2016 by middle market companies. The Survey is conducted by the Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors (AM&AA) organization through its members. The AM&AA members represent sellers and buyers of businesses ranging from $5 to over $500 million in transaction value. With over 1,000 members, typical services of AM&AA members include seller representation, buyer representation, due diligence, accounting, financing, business valuation, tax planning, legal, strategic advisory, and other transaction services. Average Multiples and Total Transaction Volume Down The average and median multiples for completed deals during the first half of 2016 (June 2016 Survey) were 5.81x and 4.00x EBITDA respectively. This compares to average and median multiples of 4.93x and 4.62x EBITDA during the first six months of 2015 (June 2015 Survey). AM&AA defines deal makers in two categories: M&A Brokers and M&A Advisors. M&A Brokers are primarily compensated on a success-fee basis while M&A Advisors are primarily paid a consulting or advisory fee irrespective of a transaction closing. The annual closing rates per individual varied between these categories. Annualized deals closed per respondent were up slightly for both M&A Brokers and M&A Advisors at 3.6 and 2.4, respectively. The total number of completed deals was down in the June 2016 Survey. Transaction dollar volume declined to $2.1 billion, down from $2.4 billion in the June 2015 Survey. Average deal size is variable from period to period but sometimes helpful in identifying trends. Average deal size for M&A Brokers declined compared with the June 2015 Survey while the average deal size for M&A Advisors increased over the same span. The deal size for M&A Advisors tends to vary in a wider range than the deal size for M&A Brokers. Manufacturing Continues to be the Top Industry in Completed Deals Members provided services related to transactions in most industries defined by the twodigit North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). Manufacturing transactions were once again the most frequent in the recent survey as in prior survey periods while the Information services industry provided the highest dollar volume. The top industries for the number of completed deals were: 1) Manufacturing Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 1
3 2) Information 3) Retail Trade 4) Wholesale Trade 5) Healthcare & Social Assistance (tie) The top industries for dollar volume of completed deals were: 1) Information 2) Manufacturing 3) Professional, Scientific and Technical Services 4) Finance and Insurance 5) Other Services (except public administration) Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 2
4 Introduction AM&AA is the premiere international organization serving the educational and resource needs of the middle-market M&A profession. Formed in 1998 to bring together CPAs, attorneys, intermediaries and other experienced corporate financial advisors, AM&AA s professional services firms, including some of the most highly recognized leaders in the industry, draw upon their combined transactional expertise to better serve the needs of their middle market clients worldwide. AM&AA members were solicited to answer questions about themselves and their services, as well as about the transactions they had closed during the period January 2016 through June Approximately 5.5% of members responded to the survey. Results from the June 2016 Survey were analyzed and compared to prior surveys. Results Transaction Multiples. In the Survey, members provided transaction data that included general transaction price (Price) and EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, interest, depreciation and amortization) for 43 individual transactions that closed in the six-month period in June The analysis of the Survey provided the following observations. The average EBITDA multiple reported in the June 2016 Survey for all transactions was 5.81x, compared to 4.93x in the June 2015 Survey. The median EBITDA multiple reported in the June 2016 Survey for all transactions was 4.00x, compared to 4.62x in the June 2015 Survey. Average and median EBITDA multiples over the past five years are plotted in the subsequent graph. The median multiple reported in the June 2016 Survey was at the low end of the range of prior Survey results. Average and Median EBITDA Multiples End June 2011 End Dec 2011 End June 2012 End Dec 2012 End June 2013 End Dec 2013 End June 2014 End Dec 2014 End June 2015 End June 2016 Average Median Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 3
5 Note: Prior to 2013, multiples were reported in half point increments. Beginning in 2013, multiples were collected in quarter point increments with minimal impact on observed multiples. In the June 2016 Survey, most respondents answered the EBITDA and consideration dollar range questions but did not answer the range of multiples question. Therefore, the multiples in the June 2016 Survey, were inferred based on the dollar ranges provided. There was no survey conducted for the six months December Transaction Multiples by Industry Average multiples were also calculated by industry. In many instances, sample sizes are small and the data may represent a broad based industry classification. Deal size and company size are observed to be factors that influence multiples. The June 2016 Survey provided data to calculate the inferred EBITDA multiples for 43 transactions. The average EBITDA multiples, by industry, are detailed in the table below. Average EBITDA Multiple by Industry 1st Half 2015 Completed Deals 1st Half 2016 Completed Deals 11 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, Hunting NA 0 NA 0 21 Mining, Quarrying, Oil and Gas Extration NA Utilities Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transportation and Warehousing Information Finance and insurance Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Professional, Scientific and Technical Services Management of Companies and Enterprises NA 1 NA 0 56 Administrative, Support, Waste Management & Remediation Services NA 0 NA 0 61 Educational Services NA 0 62 Health Care and Social Assistance Arts, Entertainment and Recreation NA 1 NA 0 72 Accomodation and Food Services Other Services (except public administration) All Industries Multiple Frequency Distribution. The following chart details the EBITDA multiple frequency distribution for the 43 reported transactions in the June 2016 Survey. Approximately 12% had multiples less than 3.00x EBITDA, 58% had multiples less than 5.00x EBITDA, and 18% of transactions had multiples equal to or higher than 10.00x EBITDA. The frequency distribution of EBITDA multiples in the June 2016 Survey compared to the June 2015 Survey in that the majority of multiples are between 3.00x and 6.00x EBITDA. Note: percentage totals in this report may not foot due to rounding. Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 4
6 AM&AA EBITDA Multiples for All Industry Deals 35% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 13% Less than 3x 20% 12% 12% 20% 27% 7% 7% 3.0 to 3.9x 4.0 to 4.9x 5.0 to 5.9x 6.0 to 6.9x 7.0 to 7.9x 8.0 to 8.9x 9.0 to 9.9x Greater than 10x 4% 0% 0% 2% 14% 0% 7% 7% 14% First Half 2015 First Half 2016 Factors Influencing EBITDA Multiple. The relationship between the EBITDA multiples in the last three Surveys to: 1) transaction size, 2) EBITDA, and 3) revenue is examined and detailed in the following charts. Average EBITDA Multiple vs Total Consideration NA < $1 Million $1 $5 Million $5 $10 Million $10 $25 Million $25 $50 Million > $50 Million 1st Half st Half st Half 2016 Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 5
7 Average EBITDA Multiple vs Revenue Dollars < $1 Million $1 $5 Million $5 $10 Million $10 $25 Million $25 $50 Million > $50 Million 1st Half st Half st Half 2016 Average EBITDA Multiple vs EBITDA Dollars NA 0.0 < $250K $250K $500K $500K $1MM $1 $3 MM $3 $5MM $5 $10MM > $10MM 1st Half st Half st Half 2016 A positive relationship between transaction size (total consideration) and the size of EBITDA multiples has been observed in previous Surveys conducted. The June 2016 Survey results are consistent with this observation. A positive relationship between EBITDA multiples and the size of revenue dollars has been observed in previous Surveys conducted, although not as strong as the relationship between EBITDA multiples and total consideration. The June 2016 Survey results are consistent with this observation. Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 6
8 A weak relationship between EBITDA multiples and the size of EBITDA dollars has been observed in previous Surveys conducted. The June 2016 Survey results consistent with this observation indicating that little or no observable relationship exists. Principal Reasons for EBITDA Multiples Greater than 10x. Of the five transactions with reported multiples greater than 10.00x EBITDA in the June 2016 Survey, two respondents cited high synergy for the buyer, one cited high a high growth opportunity, one cited high multiples for the industry in general (scientific and technical services), and one indicated that the deal included non-operating real estate. Member Composition. The following table shows the composition of the respondents. The M&A Advisor category includes individuals who self-identify as accountants, appraisers, attorneys, management consultants, or others. Typically, M&A Advisors obtain most of their compensation as fees for service, whereas M&A Brokers receive most of their compensation as success fees for completed transactions. Business Buyers are typically private equity and corporate development professionals. Respondents who identified themselves as Other fall outside of these categories, such as other types of financial service providers or executives. In the Survey, persons who responded as Other are included with M&A Advisors. The rationale behind this categorization is that M&A Brokers and Buyers have opposing motivations with M&A Brokers seeking to maximize price and Buyers seeking to minimize price. M&A Advisors, whose compensation is not likely to be tied directly to deal size, may not have the same motivations. The effect of such motivational differences among these groups, if any, would most likely be found in deal multiples; however, other patterns may be discerned. The mix of respondents in recent Survey s shifted with M&A Brokers representing a lower segment of total respondents. Survey Composition (may not total 100% due to rounding) June 2013 Dec 2013 June 2014 Dec 2014 June 2015 June 2016 M&A Broker M&A Advisor Business Buyer Member Clients. M&A Brokers and Advisors were asked to indicate whether their clients were sellers, buyers or both. Of the 53 M&A Brokers and Advisors who responded to the June 2016 Survey, those Brokers and Advisors who work exclusively or mostly for sellers represented 46.5% of the survey responses, which is similar the prior period (June 2015 Survey, 51.4%), and similar to levels reported in prior surveys. The proportion of M&A Brokers and Advisors who split their time equally between working for buyers and sellers was 25.6% in the June 2016 Survey, down from 40.0% in the June 2015 Survey. Number of Completed Transactions. A total of 83 closed deals were reported by members in the June 2016 Survey, with 57 reported by M&A Brokers and Advisors, 3 reported by Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 7
9 Buyers and 23 reported by others. There was a decrease in the number of completed transactions by M&A Brokers and M&A Advisors in the June 2016 Survey compared to the June 2015 Survey (excluding respondents with unusually high level of closed deals). Number of completed transactions (excluding Buyers) June 2013 Dec 2013 June 2014 Dec 2014 June 2015 June 2016 M&A Broker [a] M&A Advisor [b] Total Transactions [a] Excludes respondent reporting 50 closed transactions in June [b]excludes respondents reporting 48 and 26 closed transactions in December 2014, 15 closed transactions in June 2015, and 25 and 11 closed transactions in June Transactions outside North America. In the June 2016 Survey, 8 of the 83 transactions (9.6%) had targets outside North America compared to 12.9% and 14.8%, respectively, in the prior two Surveys. In the June 2016 Survey, the total U.S. dollar value of the reported transactions outside of North America was $790 million compared to $267 million (June 2015) and $542 million (Dec 14) in the prior two Surveys. Transactions per Individual. The average and median number of closed transactions reported per respondent was 1.8 and 1.0, respectively in the June 2016 Survey. The number of transactions per respondent increased for both M&A Advisors and M&A Brokers. Average Number of Transactions per Respondent June 2013 Dec 2013 June 2014 Dec 2014 June 2015 June 2016 M&A Broker [a] M&A Advisor [b] [a] Excludes respondent reporting 50 closed transactions in June [b] Excludes respondents reporting 48 and 26 closed transactions, respectively, in December 2014, respondent reporting 15 transactions in June 2015, and respondents reporting 25 and 11 transactions closed in the June 2016 period. Dollar Volume of Transactions. In total, all respondents reported a total of $2.1 billion in closed transactions in the June 2016 Survey, down from the total value of $2.4 billion in the June 2015 Survey. The June 2016 Survey had fewer respondents so the decline in dollar value is consistent with expectations. In the June 2016 Survey, M&A Brokers reported $0.6 billion in closed transactions compared to $1.5 billion for M&A Advisors. Volume ($ millions) of Reported Transaction (excl. Business Buyers) June 2013 Dec 2013 June 2014 Dec 2014 June 2015 June 2016 M&A Broker $410 $525 $3,650 $1,122 $1,537 $589 M&A Advisor $2,253 $1,281 $2,490 $4,176 $608 $1,454 Total $2,663 $1,806 $6,140 $5,308 $2,145 $2,043 Note: Totals exclude business buyers. Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 8
10 Average Transaction Size. In the June 2016 Survey, the average transaction size for all respondents was $25.4 million compared to $19.0 million in the June 2015 Survey. In the June 2016 Survey, M&A Brokers reported $16.4 million in closed transactions compared to $33.3 million for M&A Advisors. M&A Broker transaction size decreased by 26.6% while M&A Advisors increased by 170.5%. Average Transaction Size ($ millions) June 2013 Dec 2013 June 2014 Dec 2014 June 2015 June 2016 M&A Broker [a] $6.6 $9.2 $7.9 $13.2 $22.3 $16.4 M&A Advisor [b] $47.9 $51.2 $89.3 $37.8 $12.2 $33.3 *Not all reported transactions had associated size information. [a] Excludes one large transaction with a value over $1 billion and one respondent reporting 50 transactions with an average value of $3 million from the June 2014 data. [b] One M&A Advisor reported 6 transactions in the December 2013 period that totaled over $1 billion, contributing to the large increase in average transaction size for M&A Advisors. Had this individual s transactions been excluded the average for M&A Advisors would have been $38.7 million per M&A Advisor. AM&AA Members Transaction Size Dec 12 Jun 13 Dec 13 Jun 14 Dec 14 Jun 15 Jun 16 M&A Broker M&A Advisor The following chart presents the frequency distribution of the transactions by total consideration. Some, but not all, of the reported transactions reported transaction size. Therefore, only those transactions with transaction size data were included in the chart. In the June 2016 Survey, over half (53%) of the transactions were in the range of $1 to $10 million with 8.8% over $50 million. By comparison, in the June 2015 Survey, less than half (45.9%) of the transactions were in the range of $1 to $10 million with 18.9% over $50 million. Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 9
11 Transaction Distribution < $1 million $1 < $5 million $5 < $10 million $10 < $25 million $25 < $50 million $50 < $75 million $75 < $100 million > $100 million First Half 2015 First Half 2016 Frequency of Transactions by Industry. Respondent were asked to provided detail regarding the specific industry in which the transaction company operated by the two-digit North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). Some respondents reported multiple or secondary classifications for each transaction. The secondary NAICS classifications were excluded from the analysis. In the June 2016 Survey, industry data was reported for 70 of the 83 qualifying transactions. Transactions in the manufacturing industry were once again most prevalent in terms of frequency of occurrence. The top five industries in the June 2016 Survey were as follows: 1) Manufacturing 2) Retail Trade 3) Health Care and Social Assistance Wholesale Trade 4) Information 5) Finance and Insurance (tie) Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 10
12 Frequency of Transactions by Industry (percent) June Dec Industry 11 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, Hunting % % % % % % 21 Mining, Quarrying, Oil and Gas Extraction 8.6% 4.7% 1.5% 1.6% 0.8% 1.4% 22 Utilities 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 1.6% 0.0% 4.3% 23 Construction 6.7% 4.7% 9.1% 4.8% 2.4% 0.0% Manufacturing 23.8% 25.9% 15.9% 19.8% 37.1% 24.0% 42 Wholesale Trade 11.4% 9.4% 6.8% 8.7% 7.3% 4.3% Retail Trade 10.5% 9.4% 6.1% 14.3% 4.8% 14.3% Transportation and Warehousing 3.8% 0.0% 5.3% 1.6% 3.2% 1.4% 51 Information 3.8% 14.1% 6.1% 4.8% 5.6% 8.6% 52 Finance and insurance 6.7% 8.2% 3.8% 2.4% 3.2% 8.6% 53 Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1.9% 1.2% 4.5% 4.0% 2.4% 7.1% 54 Prof., Scientific and Technical Services 12.9% 3.5% 9.8% 11.1% 14.5% 4.3% 55 Management of Companies and Enterprises 1.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 56 Admin, Support, Waste Man. & Rem. Services 4.8% 0.0% 4.5% 1.6% 0.8% 0.0% 61 Educational Services 0.0% 1.2% 4.5% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 62 Health Care and Social Assistance 4.8% 5.9% 6.1% 7.9% 8.1% 11.4% 71 Arts, Entertainment and Recreation 1.9% 1.2% 3.8% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 72 Accommodation and Food Services 1.9% 2.4% 5.3% 0.0% 0.0% 4.3% 81 Other Services (except public administration) 4.8% 5.9% 3.0% 13.5% 6.5% 5.7% Dollar Volume by Industry. The top five industries in terms of dollar volume of transactions in the June 2016 Survey were as follows: 1) Information 2) Manufacturing 3) Professional, Scientific and Technical Services 4) Finance and Insurance 5) Other Services (except public administration) June Dec June June Total Dollar Volume by Industry (U.S. Dollars) Total Value Transactions Reported 11 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, Hunting $ 0 21 Mining, Quarrying, Oil and Gas Extration $ 2,500, Utilities $ 35,000, Construction $ Manufacturing $ 211,000, Wholesale Trade $ 10,000, Retail Trade $ 47,000, Transportation and Warehousing $ 2,500, Information $ 215,000, Finance and insurance $ 103,500, Real Estate and Rental and Leasing $ 30,000, Professional, Scientific and Technical Services $ 110,000, Management of Companies and Enterprises $ 0 56 Administrative, Support, Waste Management & Remediation Services $ 0 61 Educational Services $ 0 62 Health Care and Social Assistance $ 46,000, Arts, Entertainment and Recreation $ 0 72 Accomodation and Food Services $ 27,000, Other Services (except public administration) $ 60,000,000 4 All Industries $ 899,500, [1] For the six months June Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 11
13 In the June 2015 Survey, the top five industries were: Transportation and Warehousing; Retail Trade; Health Care and Social Services; Administrative, Support, Waste Management & Remediation Services; and Mining, Quarrying, Oil and Gas Extraction (tie). Average Transaction Size by Industry. The top five industries in terms of average transaction size in the June 2016 Survey were as follows: 1) Information 2) Finance and Insurance 3) Professional, Scientific and Technical Services 4) Utilities 5) Manufacturing Average Transactions Size (Millions) June Dec June Dec June June Industry 11 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, Hunting $ $ $ $ $ NA 21 Mining, Quarrying, Oil and Gas Extraction $ 6.7 $ 34.5 $ 7.5 $ 55.0 $ 37.5 $ Utilities $ 3.8 NA $ 2.5 $ 47.5 NA $ Construction $ 28.8 $ 21.9 $ 40.4 $ 6.7 $ 35.8 NA Manufacturing $ 12.6 $ 14.3 $ 16.2 $ 25.8 $ 26.1 $ Wholesale Trade $ 6.0 $ 17.8 $ 11.4 $ 20.9 $ 14.5 $ Retail Trade $ 6.0 $ 5.4 $ 13.1 $ 17.8 $ 53.1 $ Transportation and Warehousing $ 17.0 $ 8.8 $ 13.8 $ 27.5 $ 53.8 $ Information $ 12.9 $ 9.3 $ 15.0 $ 35.6 $ 16.5 $ Finance and insurance $ 23.0 $ 7.5 $ 43.5 $ 55.0 $ 25.8 $ Real Estate and Rental and Leasing $ 26.3 $ 8.3 $ 36.0 $ 27.5 $ 2.5 $ Prof., Scientific and Technical Services $ 1.7 $ 6.0 $ 18.1 $ 20.8 $ 36.9 $ Management of Companies and Enterprises $ 2.5 NA $ 2.5 NA NA NA 56 Admin, Support, Waste Man. & Rem. Services $ 6.5 NA $ 23.3 $ 47.5 $ 37.5 NA 61 Educational Services NA $ 1.3 $ 5.0 $ 52.5 NA NA 62 Health Care and Social Assistance $ 1.7 $ 24.0 $ 6.1 $ 19.3 $ 47.5 $ Arts, Entertainment and Recreation $ 3.8 $ 3.8 $ 7.5 $ 20.0 $ 2.5 NA 72 Accommodation and Food Services $ 1.3 $ 21.7 $ 4.4 $ 33.8 NA $ Other Services (except public administration) $ 6.9 $ 3.5 $ 16.3 $ 26.7 $ 7.5 $ 15.0 Summary and Descriptive Statistics for the prior three surveys. The following chart presents cumulative summary and descriptive statistics reagarding EBITDA multiples over the prior three Surveys. The chart incorporates 173 multiples with a mean and median of 5.50x and 5.12x EBITDA respecively. Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 12
14 Descriptive Statistics Last Three Surveys Descriptive Statistics June 2016 Survey Count Count High High Low 2.50 Low 2.50 Mean 5.50 Mean th Percentile th Percentile 8.75 Median 5.12 Median th Percentile th Percentile 4.00 Coeffcicient of Variation 0.43 Coeffcicient of Variation 0.49 Sandard Deviation 2.38 Sandard Deviation 2.85 Estimated Standard Error of the Mean 0.18 Estimated Standard Error of the Mean 0.43 t Cut 95.00% 1.97 t Cut 95.00% 2.02 Margin of Error 0.36 Margin of Error 0.88 Upper Bound 5.86 Upper Bound 6.69 Lower Bound 5.14 Lower Bound 4.94 Descriptive Statistics June 2015 Survey Descriptive Statistics Dec 2014 Survey Count Count High High Low 2.50 Low 2.50 Mean 4.93 Mean th Percentile th Percentile 6.62 Median 4.62 Median th Percentile th Percentile 3.87 Coeffcicient of Variation 0.42 Coeffcicient of Variation 0.40 Sandard Deviation 2.06 Sandard Deviation 2.26 Estimated Standard Error of the Mean 0.31 Estimated Standard Error of the Mean 0.25 t Cut 95.00% 2.02 t Cut 95.00% 1.99 Margin of Error 0.62 Margin of Error 0.49 Upper Bound 5.55 Upper Bound 6.13 Lower Bound 4.31 Lower Bound EBITDA Multiple Scatter Chart 10.00X OR GREATER EBITDA Multiple Frequency X TO 9.49X X TO 8.99X 7.00X TO 7.99X X TO 6.99X X TO 5.99X 4.00X TO 4.99X Count 3.00X TO 3.99X LESS THAN 3.00X Count Questions and Suggestions. If you have questions about the survey results and methodology, or if you have suggestions on additional research or surveys that would be of value to members, please contact Brady Cary or Robert Regis of Columbia Financial Advisors at or send an at bcary@cfai.com or rregis@cfai.com. To preserve confidentiality, no data on the individual transactions or the respondents will be released outside the AM&AA Market Research Committee. Market Research Committee Membership. Also, please contact Brady Cary if you would like to become a member of the AM&AA Market Research Committee and contribute to future research and survey projects. If you are a member of AM&AA, enjoy working with spreadsheets and statistical analysis of data and you can dedicate some of your time to efforts like this one, we would like to hear from you. Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 13
15 Press Inquiries. To learn more about the AM&AA s Market Research Committee or this survey, please call Brady Cary at or send an to bcary@cfai.com. To learn more about AM&AA please contact AM&AA at or info@amaaonline.org. Sponsor Information: Information is provided below on the sponsors who have made contributions to support since the second half 2012 Deal Stats survey. Sponsors assume no liability for the accuracy of any of the data or analyses provided by the Deal Stats report. Business ValueXpress Business ValueXpress is a valuation software program. It helps develop financing options to make a deal work. Due to its non-subjective method, BVX is used in front of clients for what-if analysis. BVX users are M&A intermediaries, buyers, owners, consultants, bankers, accountants and attorneys. BVX combines discounted cash flow and ROI with debt-service, debt availability, equity availability, financing terms, and value maximization. For further information about Business ValueXpress please contact Mike Adhikari at 866-BVX-VALUE or info@businessvaluexpress.com. ACT Capital Advisors, LLC ACT Capital Advisors is a leading merger & acquisition consulting firm representing middle market businesses seeking a transaction to either acquire another business or be acquired. ACT provides clients with exit planning, valuation, sell-side and buy-side representation. ACT has provided buy-side services to the private equity community for many years. ACT s deal makers have handled transactions totaling over $1 billion in value. ACT is headquartered in the Seattle area, and maintains offices in several other cities. For further information about ACT please contact Perry Campbell at pcampbell@actcapitaladvisors.com or Columbia Financial Advisors, Inc. Columbia Financial Advisors, Inc. is one of the nation s leading business appraisal and financial advisory firms. Headquartered in Portland, Oregon, the Firm s business appraisal services include estate and gift tax valuations, appraisal and financial advisory services for Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) purposes, stock based incentive plan purposes, financially-related litigation support services, appraisals for mergers & acquisitions, corporate planning purposes, buy/sell agreements, initial public offerings, financial reporting purposes, and quantification of appropriate appraisal discounts and premiums. Columbia Financial Advisors, Inc. services clients of all sizes and in virtually every industry. For additional information please contact Brady Cary at bcary@cfai.com or ext AM&AA The AM&AA is the leading association and credentialing body for middle market M&A professionals. Our leadership and people have unrivalled multidisciplinary expertise in the Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 14
16 financial services industry. AM&AA members represent sellers and buyers of small and middle-sized businesses ranging up to $500 million in transaction value. Their services are seller representation, buyer representation, due diligence, accounting financing, business valuation, tax planning, legal, strategic, and other advisory and transaction services. The AM&AA offers members a solid platform for professional collaboration. Contact AM&AA at info@amaaonline.org or Copyright Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors 15
Deal Stats Transaction Survey
July 2012 December 2012 Summary Report Prepared by Jason M. Bolt, CFA, ASA Columbia Financial Advisors, Inc. K. Perry Campbell, Ph.D., CM&AA ACT Capital Advisors, LLC April 2013 A Publication of the AM&AA
More informationAGM Survey Results NIRI NIRI 2010 Annual Conference Onsite Survey: Annual General Meetings
NIRI 2010 Annual Conference Onsite Survey: Annual General Meetings 1. Do you work for a company that hosts an annual general meeting (live or virtual)? 1 Yes 55 80% 2 No 14 20% 69 100% 2. How long after
More informationReference Point May 2015
T. Rowe Price Defined Contribution Plan Data As of December 31, Insights It s evident participants are taking advantage of the loan feature in 401(k) plans. Currently, one-fourth of participants who can
More informationInsolvency Statistics in Canada. September 2015
Insolvency Statistics in Canada September 2015 List of Tables Table 1: Total Insolvencies... 1 Table 2: Insolvencies Filed by Consumers... 2 Table 3: Insolvencies Filed by Businesses... 3 Table 4: Insolvencies
More information2015 HEALTH PLANS BENCHMARK SUMMARY 2
The Zywave Health Plan Design Benchmark Report is based on data gathered from the largest database in the country, consisting of tens of thousands of employer-offered health plans. The report provides
More informationInsolvency Statistics in Canada. April 2013
Insolvency Statistics in Canada April 2013 List of Tables Table 1: Total Insolvencies... 1 Table 2: Insolvencies Filed by Consumers... 2 Table 3: Insolvencies Filed by Businesses... 3 Table 4: Insolvencies
More informationThe Economic. Impact of Veteran-Owned. Franchise. August 30, 2011
www.pwc.com/us/nes The Economic Impact of Veteran-Owned Franchisess The Economic Impact of Veteran-Owned Franchises August 30, 2011 Prepared for The International Franchise Association Educational Foundation
More informationBusiness Optimism Survey Report Summer 2017
Center for Economic and Business Research Business Optimism Survey Report Summer 2017 July 24, 2017 Student Author(s) Elena Rodriguez In Collaboration With Contents Executive Summary..3 Clarifying Notes
More informationU.S. CAPITAL SPENDING PATTERNS
Billions of current dollars 2010 Capital Spending Report: U.S. CAPITAL SPENDING PATTERNS 1999-2008 Data in this report are from the Census Bureau s Annual Capital Expenditures Survey (ACES), which collects
More informationFINANCIAL RATIOS OF CANADIAN COMPANIES July 26, 2012 Alberto Calva // Acus Consulting Ltd
FINANCIAL RATIOS OF CANADIAN COMPANIES July 26, 2012 Alberto Calva // Acus Consulting Ltd In this paper we are presenting some financial ratios of Canadian companies. Specifically, we are presenting the
More informationApril An Analysis of Prince Edward Island s Productivity, : Falling Multifactor Productivity Dampens Labour Productivity Growth
April 2011 111 Sparks Street, Suite 500 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5B5 613-233-8891, Fax 613-233-8250 csls@csls.ca CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF LIVING STANDARDS An Analysis of Prince Edward Island s Productivity,
More informationHealth Care Reform UBA EMPLOYER OPINION SURVEY SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT
Health Care Reform A summary of employer opinions on future costs, plan designs and impact of Health Care Reform provisions About the Survey United Benefit Advisors, located in Indianapolis, has completed
More informationSouth Baldwin County, Alabama (Gulf Shores, Orange Beach, Bon Secour, Elberta, and Foley) Are You Diversified?
South Baldwin County, Alabama (Gulf Shores, Orange Beach, Bon Secour, Elberta, and Foley) Are You Diversified? By: Henry B. Burdg Director, Auburn Technical Assistance Center (ATAC), Auburn University
More informationCCAA Statistics in Canada. Third Quarter of 2017
2017 CCAA Statistics in Canada Third Quarter of 2017 Sections Highlights... 3 Table 1: Total CCAA Proceedings Domestic....6 Table 2: Total CCAA Proceedings Filed by Province.......7 Table 3: CCAA Proceedings
More informationApril An Analysis of Saskatchewan s Productivity, : Capital Intensity Growth Drives Strong Labour Productivity Performance CENTRE FOR
April 2011 111 Sparks Street, Suite 500 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5B5 613-233-8891, Fax 613-233-8250 csls@csls.ca CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF LIVING STANDARDS An Analysis of Saskatchewan s Productivity, 1997-2007:
More informationSELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationMassachusetts Program Administrators and Energy Efficiency Advisory Council
2016 C&I CUSTOMER PROFILE PROJECT Deep Dive Report Exploration of HVAC Trends Massachusetts Program Administrators and Energy Efficiency Advisory Council Date: February 9, 2018 Table of contents 1 EXPLORATION
More informationEconomic Overview City of Tyler, TX. January 8, 2018
Economic Overview City of Tyler, TX January 8, 2018 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE...3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS...5 WAGE TRENDS...5 COST OF LIVING INDEX...6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT...7 OCCUPATION SNAPSHOT...9 INDUSTRY CLUSTERS...
More informationEconomic Overview York County, South Carolina. February 14, 2018
Economic Overview York County, February 14, 2018 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE... 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS... 5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE... 5 WAGE TRENDS... 6 COST OF LIVING INDEX... 6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT... 7 OCCUPATION SNAPSHOT...
More informationEconomic Overview New York
Report created on October 20, 2015 Economic Overview Created using: Contact: Lisa.Montiel@suny.edu DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE...3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS...5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE...5 WAGE TRENDS...6 COST OF LIVING INDEX...6
More informationECONOMIC OVERVIEW DuPage County, Illinois
ECONOMIC OVERVIEW DuPage County, Illinois DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE... 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS... 5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE... 5 WAGE TRENDS... 6 COST OF LIVING INDEX... 7 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT... 8 OCCUPATION SNAPSHOT...
More informationEconomic Overview Loudoun County, Virginia. October 23, 2017
Economic Overview October 23, 2017 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE... 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS... 5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE... 5 WAGE TRENDS... 6 COST OF LIVING INDEX... 6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT... 7 OCCUPATION SNAPSHOT... 9 INDUSTRY
More informationEconomic Overview Long Island
Report created on October 20, 2015 Economic Overview Long Island Created using: Contact: Lisa.Montiel@suny.edu DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE...3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS...5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE...5 WAGE TRENDS...6 COST OF
More informationEconomic Overview. Lawrence, KS MSA
Economic Overview Lawrence, KS MSA March 5, 2019 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE... 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS... 5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE... 5 WAGE TRENDS... 6 COST OF LIVING INDEX... 7 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT... 8 OCCUPATION SNAPSHOT...
More informationLOCALLY ADMINISTERED SALES AND USE TAXES A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE INSTITUTE FOR PROFESSIONALS IN TAXATION
LOCALLY ADMINISTERED SALES AND USE TAXES A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE INSTITUTE FOR PROFESSIONALS IN TAXATION PART II: ESTIMATED COSTS OF ADMINISTERING AND COMPLYING WITH LOCALLY ADMINISTERED SALES AND USE
More informationNevada Commerce Tax Narrative. Prepared by Commerce Tax Division
Nevada Commerce Tax Narrative Prepared by Commerce Tax Division Commerce Tax Highlights Annual tax on business entities engaged in business in Nevada Each business entity engaged in business in Nevada
More informationIn-House Fraud Investigation Teams: 2017 Benchmarking Report
In-House Fraud Investigation Teams: 2017 Benchmarking Report Contents Key Findings 3 Introduction 4 Methodology...4 Respondent Demographics 5 Industry of Respondents Organizations...6 Region of Respondents
More informationEconomic Overview Fairfax / Falls Church. October 23, 2017
Economic Overview Fairfax / Falls Church October 23, 2017 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE... 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS... 5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE... 5 WAGE TRENDS... 6 COST OF LIVING INDEX... 6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT... 7 OCCUPATION
More informationresearch Time Off and 8 06 Severance and Paid Change-in-Control
8 06 Severance and Paid Change-in-Control Time Off and PTO Practices Banks: research A Research Report by WorldatWork and Innovative Compensation and Benefits Concepts LLC (ICBC) May 2009 About WorldatWork
More informationMetropolitan Chicago Region Overview of the Economy
June 2013 Overview of the Economy This report is issued by The Workforce Boards of Metropolitan Chicago (WBMC) for the purpose of sharing economic and workforce development information for the metropolitan
More informationJune 9, Economic Overview Billings, MT MSA
June 9, 2016 Economic Overview Billings, MT MSA DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE... 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS... 5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE... 5 WAGE TRENDS... 6 COST OF LIVING INDEX... 6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT... 7 OCCUPATION SNAPSHOT...
More informationEconomic Overview Monterey County, California. July 22, 2016
Economic Overview Monterey July 22, 2016 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE... 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS... 5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE... 5 WAGE TRENDS... 6 COST OF LIVING INDEX... 6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT... 7 OCCUPATION SNAPSHOT...
More informationEconomic Overview Capital District
August 29, 2017 Economic Overview Capital District Contact: Lisa.Montiel@suny.edu DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE... 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS... 5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE... 5 WAGE TRENDS... 6 COST OF LIVING INDEX... 6 INDUSTRY
More informationINVESTMENTS: BDC VIEWPOINTS STUDY SEPTEMBER Research and Market Intelligence at BDC
INVESTMENTS: BDC VIEWPOINTS STUDY SEPTEMBER 2014 Research and Market Intelligence at BDC Executive summary > Results for 2014 tend to be more optimistic than those for 2013. Overall, over three-quarters
More informationApril 2011 CENTRE FOR LIVING STANDARDS. CSLS Research Report i. Christopher Ross THE STUDY OF
April 2011 111 Sparks Street, Suite 500 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5B5 613-233-8891, Fax 613-233-8250 csls@csls.ca CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF LIVING STANDARDS An Analysis of Alberta s Productivity, 1997-2007: Falling
More informationDEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE...3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS...5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE...5 WAGE TRENDS...6 COST OF LIVING INDEX...6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT...7
March 14, 2017 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE...3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS...5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE...5 WAGE TRENDS...6 COST OF LIVING INDEX...6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT...7 OCCUPATION SNAPSHOT...9 INDUSTRY CLUSTERS... 12 EDUCATION
More informationCanadian M&A Insights. W i n t e r
Canadian M&A Insights W i n t e r 2 0 1 8 Implied Enterprise Value (CDN$ Millions) No. of Deals Canadian M&A Insights Winter 2018 Canadian M&A Update Canadian M&A activity remained strong in 2017, as low
More informationGOAL 0: GDP GROWTH. By 2028, New Brunswick will experience an upward trend that returns its GDP growth rate to 2008 levels. Status: NOT PROGRESSING
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 GOAL 0: GDP GROWTH By 2028,
More informationEconomic Overview Long Island
Report created on August 29, 2017 Economic Overview Long Island Contact: Lisa.Montiel@suny.edu DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE... 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS... 5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE... 5 WAGE TRENDS... 6 COST OF LIVING INDEX...
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationOctober 28, Economic Overview Yellowstone County, Montana
October 28, 2016 Economic Overview Yellowstone DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE...3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS...5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE...5 WAGE TRENDS...6 COST OF LIVING INDEX...6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT...7 OCCUPATION SNAPSHOT...9
More informationEconomic Overview Prince William/Manassas. October 23, 2017
Economic Overview Prince William/Manassas October 23, 2017 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE... 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS... 5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE... 5 WAGE TRENDS... 6 COST OF LIVING INDEX... 6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT... 7 OCCUPATION
More informationTell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you.
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on
More information542 employers completed the EmployerOne Survey
Hires Separations Hiring Difficulties Training LOOKING FOR MORE INFORMATION LIKE THIS? Visit our updated website www.workforceplanningboard.com to find labour market information in our new knowledge library
More informationEconomic Overview Western New York
Report created on August 29, 2017 Economic Overview Western New Contact: Lisa.Montiel@suny.edu DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE... 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS... 5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE... 5 WAGE TRENDS... 6 COST OF LIVING INDEX...
More information5200 Ocean Blvd, Siesta Key, FL 34242
Siesta Key Restaurant- BEST LOCATION IN THE VILLAGE! 5200 Ocean Blvd, Siesta Key, FL 34242 Listing ID: 29826583 Status: Active Property Type: Business Opportunity For Sale Industry: Food and Beverage Size:
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationAmerican Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
More informationEconomic Overview Marlboro County Labor Shed. June 29, 2016
Economic Overview Marlboro County Labor June 29, 2016 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE...3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS...5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE...5 WAGE TRENDS...6 COST OF LIVING INDEX...6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT...7 OCCUPATION SNAPSHOT...9
More informationMacroeconomic Impact of S ESOPs on the U.S. Economy
Macroeconomic Impact of S ESOPs on the U.S. Economy By Alex Brill April 17, 2013 1350 Connecticut Ave. NW Suite 610 Washington, DC 20036 www.matrixglobaladvisors.com Executive Summary S corporations that
More informationThe Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program. Compiled by the Office of the Illinois State Treasurer Treasurer Michael W. Frerichs
The Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program Compiled by the Office of the Illinois State Treasurer Treasurer Michael W. Frerichs Retirement Security What is Secure Choice? Economic Impact and Benefits
More informationOVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN ICT INVESTMENT IN CANADA, 2011
September 212 151 Slater Street, Suite 71 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5H3 613-233-8891, Fax 613-233-825 csls@csls.ca CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF LIVING STANDARDS OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN ICT INVESTMENT IN CANADA,
More informationSmall Businesses in Broward There are 33,400 small businesses in Broward County, which provide 135,000 jobs and have a combined payroll of $4 billion.
Planning Services Division February 2006 Number 43 Small Businesses in Broward There are 33,400 small businesses in Broward County, which provide 135,000 jobs and have a combined payroll of $4 billion.
More informationAlaska s Non-Petroleum Corporate Income Tax. Trends in Collections by Sector and Revised Corporate Income Tax Forecast Model
Alaska s Non-Petroleum Corporate Income Tax Trends in Collections by Sector and Revised Corporate Income Tax Forecast Model Prepared for 2007 FTA Revenue Estimation Conference September 2007 Dan Stickel,
More informationDecember Health Care Benchmarking Report
December 2017 2017 Health Care Benchmarking Report HR Metrics SHRM s Benchmarking Service To view sample reports or place an order, visit shrm.org/benchmarks or call (703) 535-6366 Are you looking for
More informationNon-Renewing Member Report
Non-Renewing Member Report July Research & Analysis Table of Contents 03 04 05 16 Introduction Methodology & Sampling Data & Analysis to Comparison INTRODUCTION Toastmasters International conducted a quantitative
More informationEconomic Overview Mohawk Valley
Report created on August 29, 2017 Economic Overview Mohawk Valley Contact: Lisa.Montiel@suny.edu DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE... 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS... 5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE... 5 WAGE TRENDS... 6 COST OF LIVING INDEX...
More informationE APPENDIX METHODOLOGY FOR LAND USE PROJECTIONS IN THE BOSTON REGION INTRODUCTION
E APPENDIX METHODOLOGY FOR LAND USE PROJECTIONS IN THE BOSTON REGION INTRODUCTION The Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC), the region s land use planning agency, is responsible for preparing detailed
More informationEconomic Overview Plant City Region. April 5, 2017
Economic Overview Plant City Region April 5, 2017 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE... 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS... 5 WAGE TRENDS... 5 COST OF LIVING INDEX... 6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT... 7 OCCUPATION SNAPSHOT... 9 INDUSTRY CLUSTERS...
More informationGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY ANDREW YOUNG SCHOOL OF POLICY STUDIES FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER ATLANTA, GA FEBRUARY 2, 2005
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY ANDREW YOUNG SCHOOL OF POLICY STUDIES FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER ATLANTA, GA FEBRUARY 2, 2005 SUBJECT: Analysis of a Tradable Motion Picture Credit for Georgia Prepared by: William
More informationFirst Quarter 2011 Small Business Survey
May 2011 First Quarter 2011 Small Business Survey Small Business Survey overview 1 Characteristics of the survey sample 1 Credit obtainment for overall sample 1 Small Business Survey highlights 2 Summary
More informationEconomic Overview 45-Minute Commute From Airport Park. June 6, 2017
Economic Overview 45-Minute Commute From Airport Park June 6, 2017 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE... 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS... 5 WAGE TRENDS... 5 COST OF LIVING INDEX... 6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT... 7 OCCUPATION SNAPSHOT...
More informationGOAL 6 FIRMS PARTICIPATING IN FOREIGN EXPORT TRADE
GOAL 6 FIRMS PARTICIPATING IN FOREIGN EXPORT TRADE By 2028, New Brunswick will have at least 1,080 firms participating in foreign export trade. Status: NOT PROGRESSING Current Situation As outlined in
More informationWisconsin Economic Development Corporation
Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation 201 W. Washington Ave. Madison, Wisconsin 53707 608.267.4417 Analyst Report Economic Modeling Specialists, Inc. www.economicmodeling.com 1 Region Info Region:
More informationApril An Analysis of Nova Scotia s Productivity Performance, : Strong Growth, Low Levels CENTRE FOR LIVING STANDARDS
April 2011 111 Sparks Street, Suite 500 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5B5 613-233-8891, Fax 613-233-8250 csls@csls.ca CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF LIVING STANDARDS An Analysis of Nova Scotia s Productivity Performance,
More informationMichigan Economic Development Corporation
Michigan Economic Development Corporation 300 N. Washington Square, Lower Level Lansing, Michigan 48913 888.522.0103 Economy Overview MEDC Region 5 East Central Michigan Economic Modeling Specialists International
More informationThe Graying of Hawaii s Workforce 2006
The Graying of Hawaii s Workforce 2006 April 2008 Hawaii State Department of Labor and Industrial Relations Research and Statistics Office Quality Information for Informed Decisions Introduction The Graying
More informationUS Economic Indicators: GDP By Industry
US Economic Indicators: GDP By Industry January 26, 218 Dr. Edward Yardeni 16-972-7683 eyardeni@ Debbie Johnson 48-664-1333 djohnson@ Please visit our sites at blog. thinking outside the box Table Of Contents
More informationTraditional Ag Credit Analysis Tools
What is Global Cash Flow and Why is it Important? Wynn Richardson Center for Farm Financial Management University of Minnesota wynn@umn.edu Michael Bonnett Vice President, Sr. Manager Ag Credit Center
More information2017 YEAR-END ECONOMIC REPORT SPONSORED BY
2017 YEAR-END ECONOMIC REPORT SPONSORED BY FOREWORD The National Small Business Association (NSBA) is the nation s first small-business advocacy organization, celebrating 80 years of small-business representation
More informationPercent of Employees Waiving Coverage 27.0% 30.6% 29.1% 23.4% 24.9%
Number of Health Plans Reported 18,186 3,561 681 2,803 3,088 Offer HRA or HSA 34.0% 42.7% 47.0% 39.7% 35.0% Annual Employer Contribution $1,353 $1,415 $1,037 $1,272 $1,403 Percent of Employees Waiving
More informationEconomic Impact Analysis of Fort Steele National Heritage Town. Final Report. By:
Economic Impact Analysis of Fort Steele National Heritage Town Final Report By: The Canadian Tourism Research Institute The Conference Board of Canada April 30, 2008 WHAT'S INSIDE This study reports on
More informationSBA s Size Standards Analysis. An Overview on Methodology and Comprehensive Size Standards Review
SBA s Size Standards Analysis An Overview on Methodology and Comprehensive Size Standards Review Khem R. Sharma, Ph.D. Office of Size Standards U.S. Small Business Administration Email: khem.sharma@sba.gov
More informationGuernsey Annual Earnings Bulletin
Guernsey Annual Earnings Bulletin 31st December 2014 - Issue date 30th March 2015 1.1 Introduction The Guernsey Annual Earnings Bulletin monitors average earnings of all employees in the Bailiwick (excluding
More informationOnline appendix to Understanding Weak Capital Investment: the Role of Market Concentration and Intangibles
Online appendix to Understanding Weak Capital Investment: the Role of Market Concentration and Intangibles Nicolas Crouzet and Janice Eberly This version: September 6, 2018 We report results of the analysis
More informationSuperannuation balances of the self-employed
Superannuation balances of the self-employed March 2018 Andrew Craston, Senior Research Advisor ASFA Research and Resource Centre The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia Limited (ASFA) PO
More information