IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
|
|
- Justina Price
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Notice of Hearing File No IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Jack L. Comeau NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a first appearance will take place by teleconference before a hearing panel of the Prairie Regional Council (the Hearing Panel ) of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (the MFDA ) in the hearing room at the MFDA offices, located at th Avenue S.W., Suite 850, Calgary, Alberta on December 5, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. (Mountain), or as soon thereafter as the appearance can be held, concerning a disciplinary proceeding commenced by the MFDA against Jack L. Comeau (the Respondent ). The Hearing on the Merits will take place in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan at a time and venue to be announced. DATED this 31 st day of October, Sarah Rickard Sarah Rickard Director of Regional Councils Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada 121 King Street West, Suite 1000 Toronto, ON M5H 3T9 Telephone: Facsimile: corporatesecretary@mfda.ca Page 1 of 13
2 NOTICE is further given that the MFDA alleges the following violations of the By-laws, Rules or Policies of the MFDA: Allegation #1: In February 2010, the Respondent prepared and delivered a written communication to client JP which was not approved by the Member, and contained statements or conclusions with respect to the risks, features and rates of return of exempt market products he was recommending to the client that were misleading, unwarranted or exaggerated, or that failed to identify the material assumptions made in arriving at those statements or conclusions, contrary to MFDA Rules 2.7, 2.8, 1.1.2, and Allegation #2: In May 2011, the Respondent prepared and delivered a written communication to clients, including client KP, with respect to an exempt product he was recommending to clients, which communication had not been approved by the Member and failed to describe the potential risks of the investment to the clients, contrary to MFDA Rules 2.7, 2.8, and Allegation #3: Between 2008 and 2010, the Respondent engaged in securities related business that was not carried on for the account and through the facilities of the Member by selling, recommending, referring or facilitating the sale of approximately $2.25 million of an exempt market product to at least 27 clients, contrary to MFDA Rules 1.1.1, 2.4.2, and PARTICULARS NOTICE is further given that the following is a summary of the facts alleged and intended to be relied upon by the MFDA at the hearing: Registration History 1. From January 1996 until November 7, 2011 when he resigned, the Respondent was registered in Saskatchewan, British Columbia, Manitoba, and Alberta as a mutual fund Page 2 of 13
3 salesperson (now known as a dealing representative) with Sentinel Financial Management Corp. ( Sentinel ), a Member of the MFDA. 2. At all material times, the Respondent conducted business in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan and operated under the approved trade name, Comeau Financial Inc. ( Comeau Financial ). 3. Since January 16, 2012, the Respondent has been registered in Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia, and Manitoba as a dealing representative with an exempt market dealer. Allegation #1: Memorandum to Client JR 4. In 1998, client JR became a client of Sentinel. At all material times, the Respondent was the mutual fund salesperson responsible for servicing his accounts at Sentinel. 5. In about February 2010, the Respondent and client JR discussed investing client JR s pension monies. At that time, client JR was 48 years old and had recently left his previous employment to begin working full time with his spouse at their family farm. 6. On or about February 19, 2010, the Respondent prepared, and delivered to client JR, a memorandum with the subject line, Information on alternative investments for [JR s] pension (the Memorandum ). The Memorandum stated, among others, the following: As discussed last Tuesday, I am enclosing some information on the various alternative investment opportunities that are currently available, and which I think would be appropriate for you to consider for your pension. As mentioned, I am recommending alternative investments to most of my clients for the following reasons: 1. The alternative investments have no or little correlation to the stock market, so they provide optimal diversification to investors who currently hold mutual funds and/or individual stocks. Greater diversification = lower overall level of risk for the portfolio. 2. The alternative investments that I deal with generally have potential for above-average returns. Invesotrs (sic) are eager to invest into investments that Page 3 of 13
4 are generating good excelelnt (sic) returns, as their mutual funds have not sone (sic) so in the last 10 years. 3. The risk level of the alternative investments is generally low. There is no volatility. The biggest risk is typically illiquidity and time. The risk/reward profile of the alternative investments that I offer my clients is very attractive (low risk high returns). 4. The alternative investments that I deal with allow investors to participate in business venture that they normally would not be able to do so on their own (due to lack of funds, lack of time and/or lack of expertise). Ventures such as land development, oil production, and commercial properties are generally very profitable ventures that few investors can partake in. I have enclosed some information on several land deals (Westbridge Riverband project in Saskatoon; Walton Verona project in Pheonix (sic), Arizona). With both of these projects they will be converting land which is not very arable into urban land, therefore increasing their values substantially. In addition, I have enclosed some information on the Standard Capital Resources fund. This is a very exciting investment opportunity investing in oilwells. This investment is projected to pay out a quarterly cashflow of 18 25% per year. I am very bullish on the price of crude oil, and therefore believe that this will be a very strong investment opportunity. Lastly, I am enclosing some information on the Optimus U.S. Real Estate fund. This fund has been purchasing real estate properties in Pheonix (sic) and Las Vegas for crazy bargain-basement prices. The fund plans to pay out a yearly distribution in the 6-8% range, and sell the properties at greatly enhanced prices on the U.S. real estate market has turned around. This is anticipated to take 3-5 years, but the expectations are for very large returns (possibly in the range of doubling to tripling). So, you can see that these alternative investments are very diversified, and all have great potential. They are a great compliment to mutual funds, and have the benefit of greatly enhancing the risk/reward ratio of your investment portfolio. I am recommending that you consider investing all or a good portion of your pension fund into these ideas. The remainder (if you don t want to put it all into alternative investments could be invested into more mutual funds). [Emphasis added.] 7. The alternative investments described in the Memorandum are exempt market products. Page 4 of 13
5 8. The Memorandum constituted a sales communication within the meaning of MFDA Rule 2.7 or a client communication within the meaning of MFDA Rule The Memorandum contained statements or conclusions with respect to the risks and features of exempt market products that were misleading, unwarranted or exaggerated, including but not limited to the following: (a) (b) (c) exempt market products provided optimal diversification which would lower the overall level of risk for the portfolio ; the risk level of the alternative investments is generally low ; and the risk/reward profile of exempt market products was low risk high returns. 10. In addition, the Memorandum contained statements or conclusions with respect to the anticipated rates of return for exempt market products which were misleading, unwarranted or exaggerated, and failed identify the material assumptions made in arriving at those statements or conclusions. 11. The Respondent recommended that client JR invest his pension monies in exempt market products, as described in the Memorandum, without providing a balanced presentation with respect to the risks and benefits of the investments. 12. Sentinel was not aware of, and did not approve, the Respondent s Memorandum. 13. Following the receipt of the Memorandum, client JR invested his pension monies and group Registered Retirement Savings Plan ( RRSP ) monies as described below. 14. On or about March 1, 2010, client JR transferred approximately $41,633 from his group RRSP with his former employer to his Sentinel RRSP account. On the same day, client JR also signed a subscription form to purchase $23,000 of the Standard Capital Resources fund Page 5 of 13
6 ( Standard Resources ) in his RRSP account. Standard Resources was an exempt market product specifically referenced by the Respondent in the Memorandum. 15. On or about April 7, 2010, client JR signed a New Account Application Form to open a Locked-In Retirement Account ( LIRA ). On the same day, client JR transferred the commuted value of his company pension with his former employer, which was approximately $84,181, to the LIRA. 16. On June 28, 2010, shortly after the pension transfer to the LIRA was completed, client JR signed subscription forms to invest $59,850 in Standard Resources and $18,900 in the Optimus U.S. Real Estate fund ( Optimus ). Optimus was an exempt market product specifically referenced by the Respondent in the Memorandum. 17. On February 18, 2011, client JR signed three subscription forms to invest a total of $37,000 in Westpoint Capital High Yield Mortgage Investment Corporation, an exempt market product, in his RRSP account. 18. On September 22, 2011, the Alberta Securities Commission ( ASC ) issued a cease trade order prohibiting any trading of Standard Resources. 19. On November 7, 2011, the Respondent resigned from Sentinel. 20. In 2012, Standard Resources merged with Northern Patriot Oil and Gas ( NPOG ) and client JR s holding of Standard Resources were converted to shares of NPOG. 21. On February 26, 2013, NPOG was placed in receivership. 22. Client JR suffered investment losses as a result of the Respondent s investment recommendations described in the Memorandum. Page 6 of 13
7 23. By virtue of the foregoing, the Respondent prepared and delivered a written communication to client JP which was not approved by the Member, and contained statements or conclusions with respect to the risks, features and rates of return of exempt market products he was recommending to the client that were misleading, unwarranted or exaggerated, or that failed to identify the material assumptions made in arriving at those statements or conclusions, contrary to MFDA Rules 2.7, 2.8, 1.1.2, and Allegation #2: to Client KP and Other Clients 24. In August 2006, client KP became a client of Sentinel. At all material times, the Respondent was the mutual fund salesperson responsible for servicing his accounts at Sentinel. 25. On or about May 11, 2011, the Respondent created and sent an (the May ) to clients he serviced at Sentinel who had already invested in Standard Resources which stated, among other things: New Offer I have been told by Standard Resources that there will be an offer from a competing oil company to purchase the Niton Wells from unit holders. While this offer has not been disclosed to unitholders yet, and I am in the process of evaluating it, it appears that it will be a very good one for unit holders. It appears that the price will be in the $8.50 to $9.40 range, resulting in very large gains for unit holders. If this offer ends up being accepted, unitholders would likely be paid out within a 2-4 month period, and be allowed to re-invest in the Standard Resources fund, as the Standard Resources fund plans to purchase new wells and repeat the entire process. What does this mean for unitholders? Well, if you were one of the original unitholders, who bought in at $5.00/unit, this offer would mean that your units grew by 70% to 88% (depending on the exact offer price), plus you would have received distributions totaling 14% to date. All of this in a period of 1.5 years! In the next few days, you will likely receive correspondence from Standard Resources outlining the offer in greater detail. I am in the process of evaluating the deal myself, but my initial view is that it appears to be a very positive situation for unitholders. I wanted to give you a heads up before you receive the notification from Standard Resources. Page 7 of 13
8 So far this has been a spectacular investment and this offer would allow investors to solidify their gains, yet provide them the opportunity to re-invest and continue to be involved in this same investment concept with the same successful management team. Lastly, it appears that the fund offering will be re-opened for purchase at $7.30/unit until the offer is finalized. So investors will have a small window of opportunity to buy in before the offer of $ $9.40/unit is accepted. This represents an opportunity to experience quick gains of 16.4% to 28.7% (depending on actual offer price)! Please give me a call or send me an if you have questions pertaining to this offer, or wish to purchase more units. Thanks. [Emphasis added.] 26. The May constituted a sales communication within the meaning of MFDA Rules 2.7 or a client communication within the meaning of MFDA Rule The May failed to fairly present the potential risks of the investment to clients, including the risks that it would not generate the rates of return identified by the Respondent. 28. The May contained representations with regards to the investment which were detrimental to the interests of clients and the public. 29. Sentinel was not aware of, and did not approve, the Respondent s dated May 11, On or about May 12, 2011, client KP (who was not an existing investor in Standard Resources) and the Respondent discussed the possibility of client KP investing in Standard Resources. 31. At about the same time, the Respondent sent a copy of his dated May 11, 2011 (as described in paragraph 25 above) to client KP. On or about May 18, 2011, client KP also received a copy of this from another investor in Standard Resources. Page 8 of 13
9 32. On June 24, 2011, based upon the information received from the Respondent, client KP invested $32,120 in Standard Resources As described above, on September 22, 2011, the ASC issued a cease trade order prohibiting any trading of Standard Resources. In 2012, Standard Resources merged with NPOG and his holdings of Standard Resources were converted to shares of NPOG. NPOG was placed in receivership in February To date, client KP has been unable to recover his investment in Standard Resources. 35. By virtue of the foregoing, the Respondent prepared and delivered a sales communication with respect to an exempt product he was recommending to clients, which had not been approved the Member and failed to describe the potential risks to clients, contrary to MFDA Rules 2.7, 2.8, 1.1.2, and Allegation #3: Sale of Unapproved Securities Outside the Member 36. Between 2008 and 2010, the Respondent sold, recommended, referred or facilitated the sale of at least $2.25 million of an exempt market product, namely bonds issued by Grasswood Property Finance Inc. ( Grasswood ), to at least 27 clients outside the facilities of Sentinel. 37. Grasswood is an Alberta corporation which is involved in real estate development. 38. The investments made by the 27 clients are summarized below: Client Name Amount Invested Client 6****2 Saskatchewan Ltd $35,000 Client EB $100,000 Clients NB and NB $250,000 Clients DE and BE $125,000 Client IG $100,000 Client AG $10,000 1 Client KP held $24,820 of Standard Resources in his Registered Retirement Savings Plan and held $7,300 of Standard Resources his open account at Sentinel. Page 9 of 13
10 Client HH $50,000 Client SH $200,000 Client DH $100,000 Client AM $200,000 Client WM $75,000 Client WN $100,000 Client EO $75,000 Clients DS and JS $100,000 Client KS $10,000 Client MS $100,000 Client RD $25,000 Client CS $200,000 Clients AS and SS $50,000 Client PS $20,000 Clients AW and RW $200,000 Client GW $100,000 Total Amount Invested $2,225, The Respondent received commissions, referral fees or other compensation totaling at least $400,000 in respect of his activities pertaining to Grasswood. 40. The Grasswood bonds were not an investment product which was approved for sale by Sentinel. 41. Sentinel did not have a referral arrangement in place with Grasswood. 42. None of the Respondent s activities with respect to Grasswood were conducted through the facilities of Sentinel. 43. By virtue of the foregoing, the Respondent engaged in securities related business that was not carried on for the account and through the facilities of the Member, contrary to MFDA Rules 1.1.1, and NOTICE is further given that the Respondent shall be entitled to appear and be heard and be represented by counsel or agent at the hearing and to make submissions, present evidence and call, examine and cross-examine witnesses. Page 10 of 13
11 NOTICE is further given that MFDA By-laws provide that if, in the opinion of the Hearing Panel, the Respondent: has failed to carry out any agreement with the MFDA; has failed to comply with or carry out the provisions of any federal or provincial statute relating to the business of the Member or of any regulation or policy made pursuant thereto; has failed to comply with the provisions of any By-law, Rule or Policy of the MFDA; has engaged in any business conduct or practice which such Regional Council in its discretion considers unbecoming or not in the public interest; or is otherwise not qualified whether by integrity, solvency, training or experience, the Hearing Panel has the power to impose any one or more of the following penalties: (a) (b) a reprimand; a fine not exceeding the greater of: (i) $5,000, per offence; and (ii) an amount equal to three times the profit obtained or loss avoided by such person as a result of committing the violation; (c) (d) (e) (f) suspension of the authority of the person to conduct securities related business for such specified period and upon such terms as the Hearing Panel may determine; revocation of the authority of such person to conduct securities related business; prohibition of the authority of the person to conduct securities related business in any capacity for any period of time; such conditions of authority to conduct securities related business as may be considered appropriate by the Hearing Panel; Page 11 of 13
12 NOTICE is further given that the Hearing Panel may, in its discretion, require that the Respondent pay the whole or any portion of the costs of the proceedings before the Hearing Panel and any investigation relating thereto. NOTICE is further given that the Respondent must serve a Reply on Enforcement Counsel and file a Reply with the Office of the Corporate Secretary within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this Notice of Hearing. A Reply shall be served upon Enforcement Counsel at: Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada 121 King Street West, Suite 1000 Toronto, ON M5H 3T9 Attention: Maria Abate Fax: mabate@mfda.ca A Reply shall be filed by: (a) providing four (4) copies of the Reply to the Office of the Corporate Secretary by personal delivery, mail or courier to: The Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada 121 King Street West, Suite 1000 Toronto, ON M5H 3T9 Attention: Office of the Corporate Secretary; or (b) (c) transmitting one (1) copy of the Reply to the Office of the Corporate Secretary by fax to fax number , provided that the Reply does not exceed 16 pages, inclusive of the covering page, unless the Office of the Corporate Secretary permits otherwise; or transmitting one (1) electronic copy of the Reply to the Office of the Corporate Secretary by at corporatesecretary@mfda.ca. Page 12 of 13
13 A Reply may either: (i) (ii) specifically deny (with a summary of the facts alleged and intended to be relied upon by the Respondent, and the conclusions drawn by the Respondent based on the alleged facts) any or all of the facts alleged or the conclusions drawn by the MFDA in the Notice of Hearing; or admit the facts alleged and conclusions drawn by the MFDA in the Notice of Hearing and plead circumstances in mitigation of any penalty to be assessed. NOTICE is further given that the Hearing Panel may accept as having been proven any facts alleged or conclusions drawn by the MFDA in the Notice of Hearing that are not specifically denied in the Reply. NOTICE is further given that if the Respondent fails: (a) (b) to serve and file a Reply; or attend at the hearing specified in the Notice of Hearing, notwithstanding that a Reply may have been served, the Hearing Panel may proceed with the hearing of the matter on the date and the time and place set out in the Notice of Hearing (or on any subsequent date, at any time and place), without any further notice to and in the absence of the Respondent, and the Hearing Panel may accept the facts alleged or the conclusions drawn by the MFDA in the Notice of Hearing as having been proven and may impose any of the penalties described in the By-laws. END. DM v1 Page 13 of 13
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
Notice of Hearing File No. 201414 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Patrick Cronin NOTICE OF HEARING
More informationIN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
Notice of Hearing File No. 201425 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Bemelekot Woldeyes Tewahade
More informationIN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
Notice of Hearing File No. 201412 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Paolo Abate NOTICE OF HEARING
More informationRE: MAURICE GUY BRAZEAU
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: MAURICE GUY BRAZEAU NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held
More informationRE: HUGH DAMIAN BAGNELL NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: HUGH DAMIAN BAGNELL NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held
More informationRE: WARREN J. McCAFFREY NOTICE OF HEARING
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Quebec District Council RE: WARREN J. McCAFFREY NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that
More information(1) Misappropriated funds in the amount of $150,000 from the account of the N.B.O.
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: JAMES DONALD BRUCE NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held before
More informationTHE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND EARL MAREK NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant
More informationRE: EDWARD PAUY KIM ING NOTICE OF HEARING I. BACKGROUND IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: EDWARD PAUY KIM ING NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND HARALAMBOS PANDELIDIS NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Part 10 of
More informationRE: JOHN CRAIG DUNN NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: JOHN CRAIG DUNN NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held before
More informationTHE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND SHAUN WAYNE HOWELL NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that
More informationIN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: GUS ANASTASIO DIMAS
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: GUS ANASTASIO DIMAS NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND ROLAND PAPP NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant
More informationTHE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND WASSEEM DIRANI NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant
More informationON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND ANDY HYON CHUL KIM NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Part 10 of By-law
More informationAMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND EDWARD PETER BODNARCHUK AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE
More informationRE: Paul Joseph PALIOTTI NOTICE OF HEARING
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Quebec District Council RE: Paul Joseph PALIOTTI NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that
More informationTHE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND JULIAN ROBERT RICCI NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that
More informationThe Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA In the matter of: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Paul Christopher Darrigo NOTICE OF HEARING
More informationON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND THE DEALER
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND DAVID EDWARD SLOAN NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that
More informationTAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 6.2 of the Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND TERRY NORMAN DYCK NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE
More informationTAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of the Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND Rajiv Puri NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA NOTICE OF HEARING
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND DARRYL JOSEPH YASINOWSKI NOTICE OF HEARING An initial appearance ( Initial Appearance ) will be held before
More informationTAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of the Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND RICHARD POIRIER NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA NOTICE OF HEARING
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND ADAM WILLIAM WOODWARD NOTICE OF HEARING An initial appearance ( Initial Appearance ) will be held before a hearing
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More informationJEREMY NICHOLAS DREW AUSTIN
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND JEREMY NICHOLAS DREW AUSTIN NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE
More informationREASONS FOR DECISION
Reasons for Decision File No. 200914 IN THE MATTER OF A SETTLEMENT HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 24.4 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Michael Rosenfelder Heard: April
More informationON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More information11 ROC OCRCVM nov o2 2017
ISSUED IIROC Nation^Weafing Coordinator 11 ROC OCRCVM nov o2 2017 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization ot Canada Organisme canadien de reglementalion du commerce des v.ileurs mobilieres IN THE MATTER
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA ANDRÉ BERGERON NOTICE OF HEARING
This non official translation of the official French version of the originating document is provided solely for public information and should not be relied upon for any legal purposes. INVESTMENT DEALERS
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY
IN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY Heard: May 1, 2006 Decision: May 10, 2006 Hearing Panel: Eric Spink, Chair Kathleen Jost William
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE HENRY COLE
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND HENRY COLE NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE
More informationSUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT. THIS SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT is dated this day of, 20
SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT THIS SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT is dated this day of, 20 BETWEEN: ANTRIM BALANCED MORTGAGE FUND LTD., a mortgage investment corporation having an office at 9089 Glover Road Box 520 Fort
More informationRE: ROCHE SECURITIES LIMITED and FRANCIS ROCHE
BULLETIN 3216 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: ROCHE SECURITIES LIMITED and FRANCIS ROCHE AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND ZYGMUNT JANIEWICZ NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Part 10 of By-law
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED -AND- IN THE MATTER OF MARK STEVEN ROTSTEIN AND EQUILIBRIUM PARTNERS INC.
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationTAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More informationRe Nieswandt REASONS FOR DECISION
Re Nieswandt IN THE MATTER OF: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Rodney Joseph Nieswandt 2018 IIROC 41 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada Hearing
More informationMUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: SHAWN SANDINK DISCIPLINARY HEARING. Hearing: June 22, 2006 Decision: July 19, DECISION and REASONS
Decision and Reasons File No. 200602 MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 and 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND KENNETH RICHARD MILLER NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Part 10
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF ZOLTAN HORCSOK OFFER OF SETTLEMENT
Settlement Agreement July 18, 2005 2005-002 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF ZOLTAN HORCSOK OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION Market Regulation Services Inc.
More informationIN THE MATTER OF CLAYTON SMITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Ontario Commission des 22nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF CLAYTON
More informationRe Elue. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ( IIROC ) 2014 IIROC 39
Re Elue IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ( IIROC ) and Afam Elue 2014 IIROC 39 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationNotice to Public. Contested Hearing. April 7, 2008 No Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance STEVE HORROCKS
Notice to Public Contested Hearing April 7, 2008 No. 2008-004 Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance STEVE HORROCKS Relevant UMIR Provisions 8.1 [Client-Principal Trading] Summary Commencing on
More informationCorporation de protection des investisseurs de l ACFM
MFDA Investor Protection Corporation Corporation de protection des investisseurs de l ACFM 121 King Street West, Suite 1000, Toronto, Ontario M5H 3T9 Telephone: 416-361-6332 Fax: 416-361-9781 Introduction
More informationCHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO THE CERTIFIED GENERAL ACCOUNTANTS ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO CERTIFIED GENERAL ACCOUNTANTS ACT, 2010
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO THE CERTIFIED GENERAL ACCOUNTANTS ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO CERTIFIED GENERAL ACCOUNTANTS ACT, 2010 DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE AND PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT TRIBUNAL IN
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF GLEN GROSSMITH OFFER OF SETTLEMENT
Settlement Agreement July 18, 2005 2005-004 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF GLEN GROSSMITH OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION Market Regulation Services Inc.
More informationAGREED STATEMENT OF FACTS
Agreed Statement of Facts File No. 201434 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Yan Feng Li (also known
More information2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) in the conduct of Shaun Wayne Howell.
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND SHAUN WAYNE HOWELL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
Unofficial English Translation INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA In the matter of: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More informationAMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND ARGOSY SECURITIES INC. AND DAX SUKHRAJ AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2010022518103 TO: RE: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Azim Nakhooda, Respondent
More informationDecision on Settlement Agreement
Unofficial English Translation Re Béland In the matter of: The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Alain
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, RSO 1990, c S.5. - and -
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationRe Gebert REASONS AND DECISION
Re Gebert IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Jeffrey Edward Gebert 2016 IIROC 44 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationRe Klemke. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)
Re Klemke IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (IDA) and Paul Ryan
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED. - and -
Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 22 nd Floor CP 55, 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN
More informationPRIVATE PLACEMENT SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT ( ; BC & USA)
PRIVATE PLACEMENT SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT (2016-17; BC & USA) TO: Re: VWR CAPITAL CORP. (the Company ) Purchase of securities of the Company Details of Subscription: The undersigned (the Subscriber ) hereby
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. IN THE MATTER OF: THE MARKET INTEGRITY RULES OF THE
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. IN THE MATTER OF: THE MARKET INTEGRITY RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED. - and -
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationREASONS FOR DECISION
Reasons for Decision File No. 201618 IN THE MATTER OF A SETTLEMENT HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 24.4 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: John Alojz Kodric Heard: December
More informationTHE NASDAQ OPTIONS MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AWC. Certified, Return Receipt Requested
THE NASDAQ OPTIONS MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AWC Certified, Return Receipt Requested TO: FROM: RBC Capital Markets, LLC Mr. Andrew C. Small Chief Compliance Officer Wealth Management 60 South
More informationSROs, Marketplaces and Clearing Agencies
Chapter 13 SROs, Marketplaces and Clearing Agencies 13.1 SROs 13.1.1 MFDA Proposed Amendments to MFDA Rule 5.3 (Client Reporting) MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO MFDA RULE
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, C. S.5, AS AMENDED - AND -
Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 19 th Floor CP 55, 19e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen oust Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE
More informationMUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA PROPOSED MFDA RULES 1.2 (DEFINITIONS), 1.2.6 (CONTINUING EDUCATION), AND PROPOSED MFDA POLICY NO. 9 - CONTINUING EDUCATION (CE) REQUIREMENTS I. OVERVIEW As per
More informationIN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: ESTHER INGLIS DECISION AND REASONS
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: ESTHER INGLIS DECISION AND REASONS Contested Discipline Hearing held February 1 and 2, 2005 Hearing
More informationTHE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA RESIGNATION COMMITTEE REPORT
THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA RESIGNATION COMMITTEE REPORT IN THE MATTER OF THE Legal Profession Act, and in the matter of an Application by Richard Gariepy, a Member of the Law Society of Alberta to Resign
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED (the Act ) - AND -
Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 19 th Floor CP 55, 19e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN
More informationAn Investor s Guide to Making a Complaint
www.iiroc.ca Tel. 1.877.442.4322 An Investor s Guide to Making a Complaint Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada Organisme canadien de réglementation du commerce des valeurs mobilières
More informationRe Toh. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)
Re Toh IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (IDA) and Weng Lok
More informationNational Instrument Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations. Table of contents
National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations Table of contents Individual registration Firm registration Part 1 Interpretation...5 1.1 Definitions
More informationI conclude that the requirement for an opportunity to be heard prior to taking an action has been met.
July 26, 2018 Island Fever Travel Inc 991 Alder St Suite 100 Campbell River, BC V9W2R1 Important Notice RE: Notice of Licence Suspension Travel Agent Licence #2282 Annual Financial Report On July 10, 2018
More informationFrequently Asked Questions. Sears Canada Employee and Retiree Claims Procedure FAQ for Employees represented by Employee Representative Counsel
Frequently Asked Questions Sears Canada Employee and Retiree Claims Procedure FAQ for Employees represented by Employee Representative Counsel This FAQ sheet is intended to act as a supplement to materials
More informationJune 4,2007. John Stevenson Secretary Ontario Securities Commission 19th Floor, Box 55, 20 Queen Street West Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S8
1604, 340 Midpark Way SE Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2X 1Pl Phone: 403-264-5896 Fax:. 403-264-9740 Toll Free: 1-888-854-7780 Website: www.eyelogic.com E-mail: info@eyelogic.com TSX Venture (EYE.A) June 4,2007
More informationFORM F7 REINSTATEMENT OF REGISTERED INDIVIDUALS AND PERMITTED INDIVIDUALS (sections 2.3 and 2.5(2))
FORM 33-109F7 REINSTATEMENT OF REGISTERED INDIVIDUALS AND PERMITTED INDIVIDUALS (sections 2.3 and 2.5(2)) GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS Complete and submit this form to the relevant regulator(s) or, in Québec,
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.N.S. 1989, CHAPTER 418, AS AMENDED, (the Act ) - AND - IN THE MATTER OF
IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.N.S. 1989, CHAPTER 418, AS AMENDED, (the Act ) - AND - IN THE MATTER OF INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) RECOGNITION ORDER (Section
More informationREASONS FOR DECISION
Reasons for Decision File No. 201519 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Terry William Sukman Heard:
More informationRe Suleiman DECISION AND REASONS
Re Suleiman IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ( IIROC ) and Rizwan Suleiman ( Respondent ) 2016 IIROC 27 Investment Industry Regulatory
More informationANNUAL INFORMATION FORM MAWER MUTUAL FUNDS. Offering Class A, Class F and Class O Units of: Offering Class A and Class O Units of:
No securities regulatory authority has expressed an opinion about these units and it is an offence to claim otherwise. ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM MAWER MUTUAL FUNDS Offering Class A, Class F and Class O Units
More informationREASONS FOR DECISION
Reasons for Decision File No. 201326 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Murray Arnold Greenberg
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Release No. 9565 / March 27, 2014 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 71823 / March 27, 2014 ACCOUNTING
More informationALBERTA SECURITIES COMMISSION DECISION. Citation: Re Zhang, 2018 ABASC 28 Date: Fengjiu Zhang. Tom Cotter James Oosterbaan
ALBERTA SECURITIES COMMISSION DECISION Citation: Re Zhang, 2018 ABASC 28 Date: 20180215 Fengjiu Zhang Panel: Tom Cotter James Oosterbaan Representation: Don Young for Commission Staff Perry Mack, Q.C.
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND WILLIAM RICHARD BOOTH BELL WRIGHT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Enforcement
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c.s.5, as amended. - and -
Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 19 th Floor CP 55, 19e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN
More informationNotice to Public. Contested Hearing. MICHAEL BOND and SESTO DELUCA. December 20, 2006 No Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance
Notice to Public Contested Hearing December 20, 2006 No. 2006-010 Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance MICHAEL BOND and SESTO DELUCA Relevant UMIR Provisions 2.2 Manipulative and Deceptive Method
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, RSO 1990, c S.5 - AND - IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT BRUCE RUSH AND BREAKTHROUGH FINANCIAL INC.
Ontario Commission des 22nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA NOTICE OF APPLICATION IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND PEREGRINE FINANCIAL GROUP CANADA, INC. NOTICE
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED - AND -
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND STEVEN FRED BODON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
More informationRe Mendelman REASONS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF SETTLEMENT
Re Mendelman IN THE MATTER OF: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and Allen Samuel Mendelman 2016 IIROC 14 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationNATIONAL INSTRUMENT REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS AND EXEMPTIONS
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 31-103 REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS AND EXEMPTIONS Table of contents Part 1 Interpretation 1.1 Definitions of terms used throughout this Instrument 1.2 Interpretation of securities in
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA NOTICE OF HEARING
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND JEAN-LOUIS TRUDEAU NOTICE OF HEARING An initial appearance ("Initial Appearance") will be held before a hearing
More informationRe Pan. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)
Re Pan IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (IDA) and Sammy Shieh
More information