State Bar of Michigan. Statewide and County Demographics
|
|
- Delilah Carr
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Statewide and County Demographics
2 Statewide and County Membership Demographics 2018 Statewide Demographics All Active Members by US Residency... 1 All Active Members by Michigan Residency... 1 Active Michigan Residents by Gender... 1 Active Michigan Residents by Generation... 1 Active Michigan Residents by Generation and Gender... 2 Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity... 2 Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity and Generation... 3 Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity and Admit Year... 4 Active Michigan Residents by Generation, Gender, and Race/Ethnicity... 7 Active Michigan Residents by Law School... 8 Active Michigan Residents by Occupational Area...8 Active Michigan Residents Private Practitioners by Firm Size... 9 Active Michigan Residents by Occupational Area and Section Memberships Active Michigan Residents by Firm Size and Section Memberships Active Michigan Residents by County All Active Members by State County Demographics Active Michigan Residents Join Year by County Active Michigan Residents by Gender Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity Active Michigan Residents by Generation Active Michigan Residents by Private and Non-Private Practice Active Michigan Residents in Private Practice by Firm Size Active Michigan Residents by Age Group Please note: The information in the following tables reflects membership information as of July 1, Additional members will join the in Race/ethnic and gender data is collected on a voluntary basis. For active Michigan residents 100 percent reported gender information and 69.6 percent reported race/ethnic information.
3 Statewide Demographics 2018 All Active Members by US Residency, 2018 N Percent US Resident 42, Non-US Resident , All Active Members by Michigan Residency, 2018 N Percent Michigan Resident 35, Non-Resident 6, , Active Michigan Residents by Gender, 2018 N Percent Male 23, Female 12, , Active Michigan Residents by Generation, 2018 N Percent Traditionalists , Boomers , Gen X , Millennials , ,
4 Active Michigan Residents by Generation and Gender, 2018 Gender Male Female Traditionalists 1944 N 2, ,294 % 91.0% 9.0% 100.0% Boomers N 9,251 3,158 12,409 % 74.6% 25.4% 100.0% Gen X N 8,093 5,886 13,979 % 57.9% 42.1% 100.0% Millennials N 3,584 2,988 6,572 % 54.5% 45.5% 100.0% N 23,016 12,238 35,254 % 65.3% 34.7% 100.0% Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity, 2018 (Excludes No Answer and Prefer Not to Answer) N Percent American Indian Asian-Pacific Islander African Origin 1, European 20, Hispanic-Latino Multi-Racial Arab Origin Other Ethnic Origin 1, ,
5 Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity and Generation, 2018 (Race/Ethnicity Excludes No Answer and Prefer Not to Answer) Generation Traditionalists 1944 Boomers Gen X Millennials American Indian N % 4.2% 25.4% 50.0% 20.3% 100.0% Asian-Pacific Islander N % 0.4% 12.2% 54.9% 32.5% 100.0% African Origin N ,409 % 4.5% 39.2% 45.0% 11.2% 100.0% European N 1,493 7,860 8,645 2,428 20,426 % 7.3% 38.5% 42.3% 11.9% 100.0% Hispanic-Latino N % 0.5% 19.4% 49.5% 30.6% 100.0% Multi-Racial N % 4.5% 27.1% 43.0% 25.5% 100.0% Arab Origin N % 1.6% 8.5% 41.2% 48.7% 100.0% Other Ethnic Origin N ,073 % 1.6% 14.6% 49.6% 34.2% 100.0% N 1,611 8,904 10,747 3,627 24,889 % 6.5% 35.8% 43.2% 14.6% 100.0% 3
6 Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity and Admit Year, 2018 (Race/Ethnicity Excludes No Answer and Prefer Not to Answer) Race/Ethnicity Indian American Islander Asian-Pacific African Origin European Hispanic- Latino Multi-Racial Arab Origin Origin Other Ethnic 1980 N % 0.2% 0.6% 6.9% 86.7% 0.4% 2.7% 0.8% 1.7% 100.0% 1981 N % 0.2% 0.6% 4.8% 90.3% 0.8% 2.1% 0.6% 0.6% 100.0% 1982 N % 0.4% 0.2% 6.9% 88.4% 1.1% 1.1% 0.2% 1.7% 100.0% 1983 N % 0.0% 0.6% 7.0% 88.9% 1.1% 0.6% 0.6% 1.1% 100.0% 1984 N % 0.2% 0.6% 5.8% 88.1% 1.4% 1.6% 0.8% 1.4% 100.0% 1985 N % 0.5% 0.7% 6.7% 88.3% 0.7% 1.3% 0.4% 1.3% 100.0% 1986 N % 0.4% 0.4% 6.0% 88.1% 1.2% 1.0% 1.0% 1.9% 100.0% 1987 N % 0.4% 0.7% 5.0% 90.2% 0.7% 1.1% 0.4% 1.6% 100.0% 1988 N % 0.5% 0.2% 6.2% 87.8% 1.1% 0.9% 1.5% 1.8% 100.0% 1989 N % 0.2% 0.6% 6.7% 88.1% 1.0% 1.2% 0.6% 1.7% 100.0% 1990 N % 0.7% 0.7% 4.5% 89.8% 1.3% 1.1% 0.2% 1.8% 100.0% 1991 N % 0.6% 0.9% 5.5% 88.0% 1.7% 1.5% 0.9% 0.8% 100.0% 1992 N % 0.3% 1.4% 5.7% 87.9% 1.3% 1.7% 0.3% 1.3% 100.0% 1993 N % 0.5% 1.8% 6.2% 87.5% 1.0% 0.8% 0.5% 1.6% 100.0% 1994 N % 0.0% 1.0% 4.1% 91.2% 0.7% 0.9% 0.9% 1.2% 100.0% 4
7 Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity and Admit Year, 2018 (Race/Ethnicity Excludes No Answer and Prefer Not to Answer) Race/Ethnicity Indian American Islander Asian-Pacific African Origin European Hispanic- Latino Multi-Racial Arab Origin Origin Other Ethnic 1995 N % 0.3% 1.7% 4.6% 88.8% 0.9% 0.9% 1.4% 1.5% 100.0% 1996 N % 0.1% 1.7% 6.7% 86.0% 1.7% 1.5% 0.7% 1.5% 100.0% 1997 N % 0.6% 2.3% 7.7% 81.0% 1.9% 4.3% 0.7% 1.6% 100.0% 1998 N % 0.3% 1.3% 8.3% 82.6% 1.3% 1.8% 2.0% 2.2% 100.0% 1999 N % 0.9% 0.9% 8.0% 85.7% 0.9% 0.9% 1.4% 1.4% 100.0% 2000 N % 1.2% 2.6% 7.4% 84.0% 1.3% 1.0% 2.1% 0.3% 100.0% 2001 N % 1.5% 2.6% 6.6% 80.0% 1.7% 0.9% 2.3% 4.5% 100.0% 2002 N % 1.0% 4.3% 8.8% 73.9% 1.4% 2.3% 3.3% 5.1% 100.0% 2003 N % 0.4% 3.1% 6.5% 75.5% 2.4% 1.2% 4.1% 6.7% 100.0% 2004 N % 0.4% 2.5% 5.9% 77.4% 2.0% 1.8% 3.0% 7.1% 100.0% 2005 N % 1.2% 2.3% 5.8% 66.0% 2.7% 2.7% 2.9% 16.4% 100.0% 2006 N % 0.3% 4.8% 6.5% 66.1% 3.1% 1.9% 2.1% 15.2% 100.0% 2007 N % 0.6% 3.8% 7.9% 62.4% 2.4% 3.4% 6.0% 13.5% 100.0% 2008 N % 0.8% 3.9% 3.9% 70.1% 0.8% 2.2% 4.1% 14.1% 100.0% 2009 N % 0.9% 4.0% 4.0% 69.2% 3.3% 3.8% 2.7% 12.2% 100.0% 2010 N % 0.9% 3.0% 3.9% 69.0% 2.8% 3.7% 4.3% 12.5% 100.0% 5
8 Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity and Admit Year, 2018 (Race/Ethnicity Excludes No Answer and Prefer Not to Answer) Race/Ethnicity Indian American Islander Asian-Pacific African Origin European Hispanic- Latino Multi-Racial Arab Origin Origin Other Ethnic 2011 N % 0.4% 4.1% 3.7% 72.0% 2.3% 2.1% 3.7% 11.6% 100.0% 2012 N % 1.3% 3.8% 4.8% 64.6% 3.5% 3.3% 6.3% 12.4% 100.0% 2013 N % 0.4% 4.9% 5.1% 69.1% 3.1% 2.9% 4.9% 9.8% 100.0% 2014 N % 0.9% 5.3% 3.9% 69.7% 3.2% 3.9% 4.7% 8.3% 100.0% 2015 N % 0.6% 5.8% 6.8% 66.7% 4.8% 2.6% 5.2% 7.4% 100.0% 2016 N % 0.2% 6.2% 6.2% 64.9% 5.0% 2.2% 9.0% 6.4% 100.0% 2017 N % 1.1% 5.3% 6.4% 64.0% 5.5% 4.1% 8.5% 5.0% 100.0% 2018 N % 0.0% 7.8% 9.7% 59.7% 5.2% 5.8% 6.5% 5.2% 100.0% N ,235 16, ,023 20,388 % 0.5% 2.4% 6.1% 79.7% 1.9% 2.0% 2.4% 5.0% 100.0% 6
9 Active Michigan Residents by Generation, Gender and Race/Ethnicity, 2018 (Race/Ethnicity Excludes No Answer and Prefer Not to Answer) Race/Ethnicity Generation Indian American Islander Asian-Pacific African Origin European Hispanic- Latino Multi-Racial Arab Origin Other Ethnic Origin Traditionalists 1944 Boomers Gen X Male N , ,464 % 0.3% 0.1% 3.3% 93.2% 0.1% 1.4% 0.5% 1.1% 100.0% Female N % 0.7% 0.0% 10.2% 87.1% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.7% 100.0% N , ,611 % 0.3% 0.1% 4.0% 92.7% 0.1% 1.2% 0.5% 1.1% 100.0% Male N , ,464 % 0.3% 0.6% 4.7% 90.1% 0.8% 1.5% 0.6% 1.4% 100.0% Female N , ,440 % 0.3% 0.9% 10.2% 83.4% 1.2% 1.1% 0.3% 2.6% 100.0% N , ,904 % 0.3% 0.7% 6.2% 88.3% 0.9% 1.4% 0.5% 1.8% 100.0% Male N , ,223 % 0.6% 2.1% 3.7% 84.6% 1.6% 1.5% 1.9% 3.9% 100.0% Female N , ,524 % 0.5% 3.1% 8.9% 74.7% 2.1% 2.2% 2.0% 6.4% 100.0% N , ,747 % 0.5% 2.5% 5.9% 80.4% 1.9% 1.8% 2.0% 5.0% 100.0% Millennials Male N , ,004 % 0.4% 3.4% 3.1% 73.2% 2.5% 2.6% 6.3% 8.4% 100.0% Female N ,622 % 1.0% 5.7% 5.9% 59.3% 4.5% 3.7% 7.6% 12.3% 100.0% N , ,626 % 0.7% 4.5% 4.4% 67.0% 3.4% 3.1% 6.9% 10.1% 100.0% Male N , ,155 % 0.4% 1.5% 4.0% 86.2% 1.3% 1.6% 1.8% 3.2% 100.0% Female N , ,733 % 0.6% 2.9% 8.7% 74.5% 2.3% 2.1% 2.6% 6.4% 100.0% N ,409 20, ,073 24,888 % 0.5% 2.0% 5.7% 82.1% 1.6% 1.8% 2.1% 4.3% 100.0% 7
10 Active Michigan Residents by Law School, 2018 N Percent Ave Maria School of Law MSU/DCL 5, Other Law School 7, University of Detroit Mercy School of Law 4, University of Michigan Law School 3, Wayne State University Law School 7, Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Law School 6, Not Reported , Active Michigan Residents by Occupational Area, 2018 N Percent Academia Corporate Counsel 3, Government 3, Government Relations Judiciary 1, Legal Services 2, Law School Military 46.1 Non-Law Related 1, Not Employed; Not Seeking Employment Not Employed; Seeking Employment Nonprofit Organization Other 1, Private Practice 17, Retired 1, Not Reported ,
11 Active Michigan Residents in Private Practice by Firm Size, 2018 N Percent Not Reported Very Large , Large , Medium , Small , Solo Full-Time 4, Solo Part-Time 2, ,
12 Active Michigan Residents by Occupational Area and Number of Section Memberships, 2018 Number of Section Memberships None Academia N % 28.0% 39.2% 18.9% 8.5% 2.4% 1.4% 1.6% 100.0% Corporate Counsel N 782 1, ,328 % 23.5% 36.5% 21.9% 10.2% 4.6% 1.9% 1.4% 100.0% Government N 1,031 1, ,067 % 33.6% 41.0% 14.4% 6.1% 2.2% 1.4% 1.3% 100.0% Government Relations N % 27.2% 38.6% 20.2% 6.1% 2.6% 3.5% 1.8% 100.0% Judiciary N ,219 % 23.3% 43.0% 18.5% 8.5% 3.7% 1.5% 1.6% 100.0% Legal Services N ,115 % 18.9% 38.2% 21.7% 10.5% 5.3% 2.6% 2.7% 100.0% Law School N % 31.7% 38.9% 17.5% 4.8% 5.6% 0.0% 1.6% 100.0% Military N % 34.8% 41.3% 13.0% 4.3% 2.2% 0.0% 4.3% 100.0% Non-Law Related N ,559 % 39.5% 44.4% 9.9% 3.5% 1.5% 0.5% 0.6% 100.0% Not Employed; Not Seeking Employment Not Employed; Seeking Employment Nonprofit Organization N % 30.8% 55.2% 9.7% 2.5% 1.0% 0.4% 0.4% 100.0% N % 30.1% 36.0% 9.9% 6.9% 4.3% 3.8% 8.9% 100.0% N % 25.3% 42.0% 20.7% 7.3% 2.1% 1.3% 1.2% 100.0% Other N ,166 % 28.6% 41.7% 17.2% 6.9% 2.9% 1.3% 1.5% 100.0% Private Practice N 2,520 5,832 4,212 2,816 1, ,677 % 14.3% 33.0% 23.8% 15.9% 7.3% 3.1% 2.6% 100.0% Retired N 79 1, ,954 % 4.0% 77.3% 12.9% 4.1% 1.1% 0.3% 0.2% 100.0% Not Reported N % 18.1% 46.4% 15.5% 9.0% 5.2% 1.8% 3.9% 100.0% N 6,875 13,736 7,159 4,093 1, ,255 % 19.5% 39.0% 20.3% 11.6% 5.3% 2.3% 2.1% 100.0% 10
13 Active Michigan Residents in Private Practice by Firm Size and Number of Section Memberships, 2018 Number of Section Memberships None Very Large 100+ N ,323 % 5.1% 23.6% 31.7% 25.0% 10.7% 2.5% 1.4% 100.0% Large N ,979 % 8.2% 28.5% 27.5% 21.3% 8.8% 3.7% 2.0% 100.0% Medium N ,126 % 11.3% 30.5% 26.5% 17.3% 9.3% 2.4% 2.8% 100.0% Small 2-10 N 907 1,767 1, ,531 % 16.4% 31.9% 23.6% 15.0% 6.8% 3.3% 3.0% 100.0% Solo Full-Time N 807 1, ,129 % 19.5% 32.3% 20.9% 13.3% 7.0% 3.9% 3.0% 100.0% Solo Part-Time N 365 1, ,404 % 15.2% 49.7% 18.1% 9.2% 3.9% 1.7% 2.2% 100.0% Firm Size Not Reported N % 17.8% 43.8% 16.8% 10.3% 4.3% 3.2% 3.8% 100.0% N 2,520 5,832 4,212 2,816 1, ,677 % 14.3% 33.0% 23.8% 15.9% 7.3% 3.1% 2.6% 100.0% 11
14 Active Michigan Residents by County, 2018 N Percent Alcona 13.0 Alger 12.0 Allegan Alpena 60.2 Antrim 58.2 Arenac 13.0 Baraga 5.0 Barry 56.2 Bay Benzie 33.1 Berrien Branch 41.1 Calhoun Cass 56.2 Charlevoix 68.2 Cheboygan 54.2 Chippewa 58.2 Clare 37.1 Clinton Crawford 23.1 Delta 55.2 Dickinson 45.1 Eaton Emmet Genesee Gladwin 21.1 Gogebic 26.1 Grand Traverse Gratiot 41.1 Hillsdale 30.1 Houghton 32.1 Huron 46.1 Ingham 2, Ionia 54.2 Iosco 42.1 Iron 22.1 Isabella
15 Active Michigan Residents by County, 2018 N Percent Jackson Kalamazoo Kalkaska 11.0 Kent 2, Keweenaw 3.0 Lake 6.0 Lapeer Leelanau Lenawee Livingston Luce 8.0 Mackinac 16.0 Macomb 1, Manistee 41.1 Marquette Mason 46.1 Mecosta 57.2 Menominee 22.1 Midland Missaukee 11.0 Monroe Montcalm 50.1 Montmorency 7.0 Muskegon Newaygo 35.1 Oakland 11, Oceana 26.1 Ogemaw 25.1 Ontonagon 4.0 Osceola 14.0 Oscoda 8.0 Otsego 60.2 Ottawa Presque Isle 18.1 Roscommon 27.1 Saginaw Saint Clair
16 Active Michigan Residents by County, 2018 N Percent Saint Joseph 55.2 Sanilac 53.2 Schoolcraft 8.0 Shiawassee 85.2 Tuscola 48.1 Van Buren 85.2 Washtenaw 1, Wayne 6, Wexford 51.1 Not Reported ,
17 Active US Residents by State, 2018 N Percent Armed Forces US 1.0 Armed Forces Canada, Europe, Middle East, Africa 16.0 Alaska 10.0 Alabama 33.1 Armed Forces Pacific 5.0 Arkansas 18.0 Arizona California Colorado Connecticut 57.1 District of Columbia Delaware 12.0 Florida Georgia Hawaii 22.1 Iowa 25.1 Idaho 13.0 Illinois Indiana Kansas 32.1 Kentucky 59.1 Louisiana 21.0 Massachusetts 98.2 Maryland Maine 10.0 Michigan 35, Minnesota 90.2 Missouri 59.1 Mississippi 15.0 Montana 12.0 North Carolina North Dakota 7.0 Nebraska 14.0 New Hampshire 16.0 New Jersey 85.2 New Mexico 45.1 Nevada
18 Active US Residents by State, 2018 N Percent New York Ohio Oklahoma 20.0 Oregon 39.1 Pennsylvania Rhode Island 7.0 South Carolina 68.2 South Dakota 5.0 Tennessee 96.2 Texas Utah 28.1 Virginia Vermont 9.0 Washington Wisconsin West Virginia 10.0 Wyoming ,
19 Demographics by County 2018 Active Michigan Residents Join Year by County, 2018 (2018 Includes only Individuals Joining by Mid-July 2018) Year Joining the Bar Alcona Alger Allegan Alpena Antrim Arenac Baraga Barry Bay Benzie Berrien Branch Calhoun Cass Charlevoix Cheboygan Chippewa Clare Clinton Crawford Delta Dickinson Eaton Emmet Genesee Gladwin Gogebic Grand Traverse Gratiot Hillsdale
20 Active Michigan Residents Join Year by County, 2018 (2018 Includes only Individuals Joining by Mid-July 2018) Year Joining the Bar Houghton Huron Ingham Ionia Iosco Iron Isabella Jackson Kalamazoo Kalkaska Kent Lake Lapeer Leelanau Lenawee Livingston Luce Mackinac Macomb Manistee Marquette Mason Mecosta Menominee Midland Missaukee Monroe Montcalm Muskegon Newaygo Oakland ,578 Oceana Ogemaw Ontonagon Osceola
21 Active Michigan Residents Join Year by County, 2018 (2018 Includes only Individuals Joining by Mid-July 2018) Year Joining the Bar Oscoda Otsego Ottawa Presque Isle Roscommon Saginaw Saint Clair Saint Joseph Sanilac Schoolcraft Shiawassee Tuscola Van Buren Washtenaw Wayne ,646 Wexford Not Reported , ,075 19
22 Active Michigan Residents by Gender and County, 2018 Male Gender Female Alcona N % 76.9% 23.1% 100.0% Alger N % 91.7% 8.3% 100.0% Allegan N % 66.4% 33.6% 100.0% Alpena N % 76.7% 23.3% 100.0% Antrim N % 75.9% 24.1% 100.0% Arenac N % 92.3% 7.7% 100.0% Baraga N % 80.0% 20.0% 100.0% Barry N % 67.9% 32.1% 100.0% Bay N % 75.8% 24.2% 100.0% Benzie N % 57.6% 42.4% 100.0% Berrien N % 69.2% 30.8% 100.0% Branch N % 70.7% 29.3% 100.0% Calhoun N % 66.2% 33.8% 100.0% Cass N % 66.1% 33.9% 100.0% Charlevoix N % 73.5% 26.5% 100.0% Cheboygan N % 70.4% 29.6% 100.0% Chippewa N % 63.8% 36.2% 100.0% Clare N % 70.3% 29.7% 100.0% 20
23 Active Michigan Residents by Gender and County, 2018 Male Gender Female Clinton N % 59.0% 41.0% 100.0% Crawford N % 82.6% 17.4% 100.0% Delta N % 78.2% 21.8% 100.0% Dickinson N % 71.1% 28.9% 100.0% Eaton N % 60.5% 39.5% 100.0% Emmet N % 72.1% 27.9% 100.0% Genesee N % 67.3% 32.7% 100.0% Gladwin N % 81.0% 19.0% 100.0% Gogebic N % 80.8% 19.2% 100.0% Grand Traverse N % 72.1% 27.9% 100.0% Gratiot N % 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% Hillsdale N % 70.0% 30.0% 100.0% Houghton N % 78.1% 21.9% 100.0% Huron N % 69.6% 30.4% 100.0% Ingham N % 62.3% 37.7% 100.0% Ionia N % 61.1% 38.9% 100.0% Iosco N % 76.2% 23.8% 100.0% Iron N % 72.7% 27.3% 100.0% 21
24 Active Michigan Residents by Gender and County, 2018 Male Gender Female Isabella N % 64.8% 35.2% 100.0% Jackson N % 70.6% 29.4% 100.0% Kalamazoo N % 68.8% 31.2% 100.0% Kalkaska N % 54.5% 45.5% 100.0% Kent N 1, ,703 % 68.8% 31.2% 100.0% Keweenaw N % 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% Lake N % 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% Lapeer N % 77.1% 22.9% 100.0% Leelanau N % 68.6% 31.4% 100.0% Lenawee N % 64.1% 35.9% 100.0% Livingston N % 60.3% 39.7% 100.0% Luce N % 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% Mackinac N % 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% Macomb N 1, ,912 % 68.7% 31.3% 100.0% Manistee N % 75.6% 24.4% 100.0% Marquette N % 60.4% 39.6% 100.0% Mason N % 71.7% 28.3% 100.0% Mecosta N % 71.9% 28.1% 100.0% 22
25 Active Michigan Residents by Gender and County, 2018 Male Gender Female Menominee N % 77.3% 22.7% 100.0% Midland N % 64.8% 35.2% 100.0% Missaukee N % 72.7% 27.3% 100.0% Monroe N % 67.2% 32.8% 100.0% Montcalm N % 66.0% 34.0% 100.0% Montmorency N % 57.1% 42.9% 100.0% Muskegon N % 70.7% 29.3% 100.0% Newaygo N % 74.3% 25.7% 100.0% Oakland N 7,539 3,849 11,388 % 66.2% 33.8% 100.0% Oceana N % 84.6% 15.4% 100.0% Ogemaw N % 64.0% 36.0% 100.0% Ontonagon N % 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% Osceola N % 78.6% 21.4% 100.0% Oscoda N % 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% Otsego N % 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% Ottawa N % 66.3% 33.7% 100.0% Presque Isle N % 55.6% 44.4% 100.0% Roscommon N % 74.1% 25.9% 100.0% 23
26 Active Michigan Residents by Gender and County, 2018 Gender Male Female Saginaw N % 72.0% 28.0% 100.0% Saint Clair N % 71.2% 28.8% 100.0% Saint Joseph N % 78.2% 21.8% 100.0% Sanilac N % 66.0% 34.0% 100.0% Schoolcraft N % 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% Shiawassee N % 68.2% 31.8% 100.0% Tuscola N % 52.1% 47.9% 100.0% Van Buren N % 64.7% 35.3% 100.0% Washtenaw N 1, ,808 % 56.1% 43.9% 100.0% Wayne N 4,042 2,564 6,606 % 61.2% 38.8% 100.0% Wexford N % 74.5% 25.5% 100.0% Not Reported N % 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% N 23,016 12,238 35,254 % 65.3% 34.7% 100.0% 24
27 Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity and County, 2018 (Race/Ethnicity Excludes No Answer and Prefer Not to Answer) Race/Ethnicity American Indian Asian-Pacific Islander African Origin European Hispanic-Latino Multi-Racial Arab Origin Other Ethnic Origin Alcona N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Alger N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Allegan N % 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 87.9% 3.0% 4.0% 0.0% 4.0% 100.0% Alpena N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Antrim N % 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% 90.5% 0.0% 4.8% 0.0% 2.4% 100.0% Arenac N % 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Baraga N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Barry N % 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 84.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.1% 100.0% Bay N % 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 86.7% 2.7% 1.8% 0.0% 7.1% 100.0% Benzie N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 96.3% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Berrien N % 0.5% 1.8% 3.7% 86.6% 1.8% 0.9% 0.0% 4.6% 100.0% Branch N % 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 93.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.4% 100.0% Calhoun N % 1.3% 2.6% 1.3% 81.3% 3.9% 1.9% 0.0% 7.7% 100.0% Cass N % 2.9% 0.0% 2.9% 88.2% 0.0% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Charlevoix N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 92.7% 2.4% 0.0% 0.0% 4.9% 100.0% 25
28 Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity and County, 2018 (Race/Ethnicity Excludes No Answer and Prefer Not to Answer) Race/Ethnicity American Indian Asian-Pacific Islander African Origin European Hispanic-Latino Multi-Racial Arab Origin Other Ethnic Origin Cheboygan N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 0.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Chippewa N % 13.2% 2.6% 0.0% 76.3% 0.0% 5.3% 0.0% 2.6% 100.0% Clare N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 96.3% 0.0% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Clinton N % 0.0% 3.3% 1.1% 92.2% 0.0% 2.2% 1.1% 0.0% 100.0% Crawford N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 93.3% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Delta N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 92.1% 0.0% 5.3% 0.0% 2.6% 100.0% Dickinson N % 0.0% 3.0% 0.0% 93.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.0% 100.0% Eaton N % 0.8% 1.2% 4.8% 88.4% 0.4% 0.8% 0.0% 3.6% 100.0% Emmet N % 4.4% 0.0% 0.0% 92.3% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% 100.0% Genesee N % 0.9% 1.2% 7.0% 80.0% 1.7% 1.7% 3.3% 4.2% 100.0% Gladwin N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Gogebic N % 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 88.9% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Grand Traverse N % 1.5% 0.6% 0.0% 92.0% 0.3% 0.9% 0.0% 4.6% 100.0% Gratiot N % 0.0% 3.4% 0.0% 93.1% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 26
29 Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity and County, 2018 (Race/Ethnicity Excludes No Answer and Prefer Not to Answer) Race/Ethnicity American Indian Asian-Pacific Islander African Origin European Hispanic-Latino Multi-Racial Arab Origin Other Ethnic Origin Hillsdale N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 94.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.6% 100.0% Houghton N % 4.2% 0.0% 0.0% 95.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Huron N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.2% 2.4% 4.9% 0.0% 2.4% 100.0% Ingham N , ,783 % 0.5% 2.0% 3.9% 84.4% 1.8% 2.5% 0.6% 4.5% 100.0% Ionia N % 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0% 5.7% 0.0% 5.7% 100.0% Iosco N % 4.5% 0.0% 0.0% 95.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Iron N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Isabella N % 3.9% 1.3% 1.3% 81.8% 1.3% 5.2% 0.0% 5.2% 100.0% Jackson N % 0.0% 1.5% 2.0% 89.6% 1.5% 3.0% 0.0% 2.5% 100.0% Kalamazoo N % 0.4% 1.6% 3.4% 86.9% 1.3% 1.8% 0.0% 4.5% 100.0% Kalkaska N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 100.0% Kent N , ,852 % 0.2% 1.1% 1.9% 88.2% 2.2% 1.8% 0.6% 3.9% 100.0% Keweenaw N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Lake N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Lapeer N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 94.1% 1.2% 0.0% 1.2% 3.5% 100.0% 27
30 Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity and County, 2018 (Race/Ethnicity Excludes No Answer and Prefer Not to Answer) Race/Ethnicity American Indian Asian-Pacific Islander African Origin European Hispanic-Latino Multi-Racial Arab Origin Other Ethnic Origin Leelanau N % 3.9% 0.0% 0.0% 94.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 100.0% Lenawee N % 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 79.7% 1.4% 5.4% 1.4% 10.8% 100.0% Livingston N % 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 91.1% 0.3% 2.2% 0.9% 4.6% 100.0% Luce N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Mackinac N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Macomb N , ,317 % 0.5% 1.2% 3.3% 84.5% 1.1% 0.9% 3.1% 5.3% 100.0% Manistee N % 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Marquette N % 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 88.7% 0.9% 2.8% 0.0% 4.7% 100.0% Mason N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 89.7% 6.9% 0.0% 0.0% 3.4% 100.0% Mecosta N % 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 92.3% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 2.6% 100.0% Menominee N % 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 81.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 100.0% Midland N % 0.0% 3.2% 1.9% 88.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 5.1% 100.0% Missaukee N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Monroe N % 0.7% 3.0% 1.5% 82.2% 1.5% 2.2% 0.7% 8.1% 100.0% 28
31 Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity and County, 2018 (Race/Ethnicity Excludes No Answer and Prefer Not to Answer) Race/Ethnicity American Indian Asian-Pacific Islander African Origin European Hispanic-Latino Multi-Racial Arab Origin Other Ethnic Origin Montcalm N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 5.6% 100.0% Montmorency N % 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Muskegon N % 0.0% 1.2% 3.5% 89.6% 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 4.6% 100.0% Newaygo N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 92.3% 0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 3.8% 100.0% Oakland N , ,915 % 0.3% 2.5% 5.1% 81.3% 1.5% 1.7% 2.8% 4.8% 100.0% Oceana N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 0.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Ogemaw N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 6.3% 6.3% 0.0% 12.5% 100.0% Ontonagon N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Osceola N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Oscoda N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 57.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 42.9% 100.0% Otsego N % 0.0% 2.2% 0.0% 91.1% 4.4% 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% 100.0% Ottawa N % 0.0% 0.7% 0.3% 90.0% 3.0% 0.3% 0.0% 5.7% 100.0% Presque Isle N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Roscommon N % 4.5% 4.5% 0.0% 81.8% 4.5% 0.0% 0.0% 4.5% 100.0% Saginaw N % 0.3% 0.3% 6.2% 84.5% 2.1% 1.0% 1.0% 4.5% 100.0% 29
32 Active Michigan Residents by Race/Ethnicity and County, 2018 (Race/Ethnicity Excludes No Answer and Prefer Not to Answer) Race/Ethnicity American Indian Asian-Pacific Islander African Origin European Hispanic-Latino Multi-Racial Arab Origin Other Ethnic Origin Saint Clair N % 0.0% 1.9% 0.6% 86.6% 1.9% 0.6% 1.9% 6.4% 100.0% Saint Joseph N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.2% 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% 7.3% 100.0% Sanilac N % 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 97.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Schoolcraft N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Shiawassee N % 1.6% 3.2% 0.0% 88.7% 0.0% 3.2% 0.0% 3.2% 100.0% Tuscola N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 80.6% 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 13.9% 100.0% Van Buren N % 4.5% 0.0% 0.0% 93.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 100.0% Washtenaw N , ,292 % 0.1% 3.3% 4.2% 85.4% 1.5% 1.7% 1.2% 2.6% 100.0% Wayne N , ,778 % 0.4% 2.5% 14.3% 71.1% 2.1% 2.1% 3.9% 3.7% 100.0% Wexford N % 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 97.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Not Reported N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% N ,409 20, ,073 24,889 % 0.5% 2.0% 5.7% 82.1% 1.6% 1.8% 2.1% 4.3% 100.0% 30
33 Active Michigan Residents, Generation by County, 2018 Generation Traditionalists Pre-1944 Boomers Gen X Millennials Alcona N % 23.1% 38.5% 30.8% 7.7% 100.0% Alger N % 16.7% 58.3% 25.0% 0.0% 100.0% Allegan N % 9.5% 41.6% 35.8% 13.1% 100.0% Alpena N % 18.3% 45.0% 21.7% 15.0% 100.0% Antrim N % 29.3% 55.2% 8.6% 6.9% 100.0% Arenac N % 0.0% 53.8% 23.1% 23.1% 100.0% Baraga N % 0.0% 60.0% 20.0% 20.0% 100.0% Barry N % 5.4% 35.7% 48.2% 10.7% 100.0% Bay N % 6.7% 45.5% 33.1% 14.6% 100.0% Benzie N % 12.1% 51.5% 24.2% 12.1% 100.0% Berrien N % 9.1% 39.2% 35.0% 16.8% 100.0% Branch N % 7.3% 46.3% 29.3% 17.1% 100.0% Calhoun N % 6.4% 40.2% 41.6% 11.9% 100.0% Cass N % 3.6% 37.5% 48.2% 10.7% 100.0% Charlevoix N % 16.2% 51.5% 19.1% 13.2% 100.0% Cheboygan N % 11.1% 63.0% 24.1% 1.9% 100.0% Chippewa N % 8.6% 36.2% 44.8% 10.3% 100.0% 31
34 Active Michigan Residents, Generation by County, 2018 Generation Traditionalists Pre-1944 Boomers Gen X Millennials Clare N % 13.5% 32.4% 35.1% 18.9% 100.0% Clinton N % 9.8% 45.9% 32.8% 11.5% 100.0% Crawford N % 13.0% 26.1% 52.2% 8.7% 100.0% Delta N % 9.1% 58.2% 18.2% 14.5% 100.0% Dickinson N % 11.1% 44.4% 28.9% 15.6% 100.0% Eaton N % 5.6% 42.3% 36.4% 15.7% 100.0% Emmet N % 13.2% 48.1% 34.9% 3.9% 100.0% Genesee N % 8.2% 37.1% 38.4% 16.3% 100.0% Gladwin N % 19.0% 42.9% 28.6% 9.5% 100.0% Gogebic N % 3.8% 53.8% 34.6% 7.7% 100.0% Grand Traverse N % 6.9% 38.8% 38.6% 15.7% 100.0% Gratiot N % 7.3% 36.6% 48.8% 7.3% 100.0% Hillsdale N % 10.0% 30.0% 50.0% 10.0% 100.0% Houghton N % 0.0% 43.8% 46.9% 9.4% 100.0% Huron N % 13.0% 47.8% 28.3% 10.9% 100.0% Ingham N , ,484 % 4.5% 35.4% 40.4% 19.8% 100.0% Ionia N % 5.6% 31.5% 46.3% 16.7% 100.0% 32
35 Active Michigan Residents, Generation by County, 2018 Generation Traditionalists Pre-1944 Boomers Gen X Millennials Iosco N % 14.3% 52.4% 23.8% 9.5% 100.0% Iron N % 0.0% 63.6% 22.7% 13.6% 100.0% Isabella N % 3.8% 32.4% 41.0% 22.9% 100.0% Jackson N % 7.4% 41.9% 36.7% 14.1% 100.0% Kalamazoo N % 5.7% 39.3% 39.7% 15.3% 100.0% Kalkaska N % 9.1% 45.5% 27.3% 18.2% 100.0% Kent N , ,703 % 4.5% 32.7% 43.2% 19.6% 100.0% Keweenaw N % 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Lake N % 0.0% 83.3% 0.0% 16.7% 100.0% Lapeer N % 9.3% 32.2% 44.1% 14.4% 100.0% Leelanau N % 15.7% 48.0% 28.4% 7.8% 100.0% Lenawee N % 9.4% 35.0% 40.2% 15.4% 100.0% Livingston N % 6.5% 36.9% 40.7% 15.8% 100.0% Luce N % 0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 100.0% Mackinac N % 6.3% 43.8% 25.0% 25.0% 100.0% Macomb N ,912 % 7.1% 34.8% 40.7% 17.4% 100.0% Manistee N % 14.6% 39.0% 31.7% 14.6% 100.0% 33
36 Active Michigan Residents, Generation by County, 2018 Generation Traditionalists Pre-1944 Boomers Gen X Millennials Marquette N % 7.6% 43.1% 31.3% 18.1% 100.0% Mason N % 6.5% 43.5% 34.8% 15.2% 100.0% Mecosta N % 12.3% 45.6% 31.6% 10.5% 100.0% Menominee N % 9.1% 59.1% 18.2% 13.6% 100.0% Midland N % 6.4% 32.4% 45.2% 16.0% 100.0% Missaukee N % 18.2% 36.4% 36.4% 9.1% 100.0% Monroe N % 5.2% 36.5% 41.7% 16.7% 100.0% Montcalm N % 12.0% 34.0% 32.0% 22.0% 100.0% Montmorency N % 14.3% 85.7% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Muskegon N % 7.2% 38.6% 36.9% 17.3% 100.0% Newaygo N % 5.7% 40.0% 37.1% 17.1% 100.0% Oakland N 771 3,709 4,623 2,285 11,388 % 6.8% 32.6% 40.6% 20.1% 100.0% Oceana N % 19.2% 42.3% 30.8% 7.7% 100.0% Ogemaw N % 12.0% 40.0% 40.0% 8.0% 100.0% Ontonagon N % 0.0% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0% 100.0% Osceola N % 7.1% 57.1% 28.6% 7.1% 100.0% Oscoda N % 12.5% 37.5% 25.0% 25.0% 100.0% 34
37 Active Michigan Residents, Generation by County, 2018 Generation Traditionalists Pre-1944 Boomers Gen X Millennials Otsego N % 10.0% 46.7% 30.0% 13.3% 100.0% Ottawa N % 5.0% 33.0% 43.1% 18.9% 100.0% Presque Isle N % 5.6% 66.7% 22.2% 5.6% 100.0% Roscommon N % 7.4% 40.7% 29.6% 22.2% 100.0% Saginaw N % 8.9% 45.6% 29.4% 16.1% 100.0% Saint Clair N % 7.1% 41.0% 37.7% 14.2% 100.0% Saint Joseph N % 5.5% 36.4% 40.0% 18.2% 100.0% Sanilac N % 9.4% 50.9% 28.3% 11.3% 100.0% Schoolcraft N % 0.0% 75.0% 12.5% 12.5% 100.0% Shiawassee N % 9.4% 49.4% 31.8% 9.4% 100.0% Tuscola N % 6.3% 37.5% 31.3% 25.0% 100.0% Van Buren N % 10.6% 35.3% 44.7% 9.4% 100.0% Washtenaw N ,808 % 7.7% 34.3% 41.8% 16.2% 100.0% Wayne N 353 2,263 2,585 1,405 6,606 % 5.3% 34.3% 39.1% 21.3% 100.0% Wexford N % 2.0% 51.0% 41.2% 5.9% 100.0% Not Reported N % 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% N 2,294 12,409 13,979 6,573 35,255 % 6.5% 35.2% 39.7% 18.6% 100.0% 35
38 36
39 Active Michigan Residents by Private and Non-Private Practice by County, 2018 Private Non-Private Alcona N % 30.8% 69.2% 100.0% Alger N % 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% Allegan N % 35.8% 64.2% 100.0% Alpena N % 58.3% 41.7% 100.0% Antrim N % 36.2% 63.8% 100.0% Arenac N % 46.2% 53.8% 100.0% Baraga N % 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% Barry N % 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% Bay N % 55.6% 44.4% 100.0% Benzie N % 60.6% 39.4% 100.0% Berrien N % 44.1% 55.9% 100.0% Branch N % 46.3% 53.7% 100.0% Calhoun N % 44.3% 55.7% 100.0% Cass N % 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% Charlevoix N % 33.8% 66.2% 100.0% Cheboygan N % 53.7% 46.3% 100.0% Chippewa N % 51.7% 48.3% 100.0% 37
40 Active Michigan Residents by Private and Non-Private Practice by County, 2018 Private Non-Private Clare N % 48.6% 51.4% 100.0% Clinton N % 31.1% 68.9% 100.0% Crawford N % 39.1% 60.9% 100.0% Delta N % 47.3% 52.7% 100.0% Dickinson N % 48.9% 51.1% 100.0% Eaton N % 34.5% 65.5% 100.0% Emmet N % 51.2% 48.8% 100.0% Genesee N % 53.8% 46.2% 100.0% Gladwin N % 52.4% 47.6% 100.0% Gogebic N % 53.8% 46.2% 100.0% Grand Traverse N % 60.1% 39.9% 100.0% Gratiot N % 53.7% 46.3% 100.0% Hillsdale N % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Houghton N % 43.8% 56.3% 100.0% Huron N % 47.8% 52.2% 100.0% Ingham N 797 1,687 2,484 % 32.1% 67.9% 100.0% Ionia N % 55.6% 44.4% 100.0% 38
41 Active Michigan Residents by Private and Non-Private Practice by County, 2018 Private Non-Private Iosco N % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Iron N % 72.7% 27.3% 100.0% Isabella N % 48.6% 51.4% 100.0% Jackson N % 41.9% 58.1% 100.0% Kalamazoo N % 55.3% 44.7% 100.0% Kalkaska N % 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% Kent N 1,569 1,134 2,703 % 58.0% 42.0% 100.0% Keweenaw N % 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% Lake N % 16.7% 83.3% 100.0% Lapeer N % 57.6% 42.4% 100.0% Leelanau N % 42.2% 57.8% 100.0% Lenawee N % 61.5% 38.5% 100.0% Livingston N % 45.8% 54.2% 100.0% Luce N % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Mackinac N % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Macomb N 1, ,912 % 53.1% 46.9% 100.0% Manistee N % 39.0% 61.0% 100.0% 39
42 Active Michigan Residents by Private and Non-Private Practice by County, 2018 Private Non-Private Marquette N % 61.1% 38.9% 100.0% Mason N % 56.5% 43.5% 100.0% Mecosta N % 45.6% 54.4% 100.0% Menominee N % 54.5% 45.5% 100.0% Midland N % 32.9% 67.1% 100.0% Missaukee N % 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% Monroe N % 45.8% 54.2% 100.0% Montcalm N % 54.0% 46.0% 100.0% Montmorency N % 14.3% 85.7% 100.0% Muskegon N % 56.2% 43.8% 100.0% Newaygo N % 54.3% 45.7% 100.0% Oakland N 6,553 4,835 11,388 % 57.5% 42.5% 100.0% Oceana N % 65.4% 34.6% 100.0% Ogemaw N % 76.0% 24.0% 100.0% Ontonagon N % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Osceola N % 78.6% 21.4% 100.0% Oscoda N % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 40
43 Active Michigan Residents by Private and Non-Private Practice by County, 2018 Private Non-Private Otsego N % 53.3% 46.7% 100.0% Ottawa N % 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% Presque Isle N % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Roscommon N % 44.4% 55.6% 100.0% Saginaw N % 60.3% 39.7% 100.0% Saint Clair N % 55.7% 44.3% 100.0% Saint Joseph N % 61.8% 38.2% 100.0% Sanilac N % 43.4% 56.6% 100.0% Schoolcraft N % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Shiawassee N % 38.8% 61.2% 100.0% Tuscola N % 39.6% 60.4% 100.0% Van Buren N % 49.4% 50.6% 100.0% Washtenaw N 780 1,028 1,808 % 43.1% 56.9% 100.0% Wayne N 2,799 3,807 6,606 % 42.4% 57.6% 100.0% Wexford N % 56.9% 43.1% 100.0% Not Reported N % 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% N 17,677 17,578 35,255 % 50.1% 49.9% 100.0% 41
44 Active Michigan Residents in Private Practice by Firm Size and County, 2018 Private Practice Firm Size Not Very Large Medium Small Solo Solo Reported Large Full- Part Time Time Alcona N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 100.0% Alger N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 37.5% 50.0% 100.0% Allegan N % 0.0% 4.1% 0.0% 0.0% 40.8% 36.7% 18.4% 100.0% Alpena N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 77.1% 14.3% 8.6% 100.0% Antrim N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.8% 28.6% 47.6% 100.0% Arenac N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 33.3% 16.7% 100.0% Baraga N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% Barry N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 41.7% 8.3% 100.0% Bay N % 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 63.6% 22.2% 13.1% 100.0% Benzie N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.0% 30.0% 35.0% 30.0% 100.0% Berrien N % 0.8% 2.4% 9.5% 2.4% 39.7% 32.5% 12.7% 100.0% Branch N % 5.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.3% 47.4% 21.1% 100.0% Calhoun N % 0.0% 0.0% 8.2% 1.0% 45.4% 32.0% 13.4% 100.0% Cass N % 0.0% 4.8% 0.0% 4.8% 23.8% 47.6% 19.0% 100.0% Charlevoix N % 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.8% 30.4% 30.4% 100.0% Cheboygan N % 3.4% 13.8% 0.0% 0.0% 20.7% 44.8% 17.2% 100.0% Chippewa N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 13.3% 50.0% 33.3% 100.0% 42
45 Active Michigan Residents in Private Practice by Firm Size and County, 2018 Private Practice Firm Size Not Reported Very Large Large Medium Small 2-10 Solo Solo Full- Part Time Time Clare N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 27.8% 5.6% 100.0% Clinton N % 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 28.9% 26.3% 42.1% 100.0% Crawford N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 44.4% 33.3% 22.2% 100.0% Delta N % 11.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 42.3% 26.9% 19.2% 100.0% Dickinson N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.5% 40.9% 54.5% 0.0% 100.0% Eaton N % 0.8% 0.0% 8.1% 0.0% 32.5% 35.0% 23.6% 100.0% Emmet N % 1.5% 10.6% 1.5% 0.0% 30.3% 27.3% 28.8% 100.0% Genesee N % 1.0% 1.2% 3.8% 1.2% 32.7% 43.8% 16.3% 100.0% Gladwin N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 18.2% 54.5% 27.3% 100.0% Gogebic N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.1% 57.1% 21.4% 14.3% 100.0% Grand Traverse N % 0.7% 0.4% 3.2% 10.7% 49.3% 21.1% 14.6% 100.0% Gratiot N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 36.4% 45.5% 18.2% 100.0% Hillsdale N % 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3% 13.3% 100.0% Houghton N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 50.0% 35.7% 100.0% Huron N % 4.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 27.3% 18.2% 100.0% Ingham N % 1.1% 15.7% 11.4% 7.0% 29.6% 22.1% 13.0% 100.0% Ionia N % 3.3% 0.0% 3.3% 3.3% 30.0% 43.3% 16.7% 100.0% 43
46 Active Michigan Residents in Private Practice by Firm Size and County, 2018 Private Practice Firm Size Not Very Large Medium Small Solo Solo Reported Large Full- Part Time Time Iosco N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 23.8% 42.9% 100.0% Iron N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 68.8% 18.8% 12.5% 100.0% Isabella N % 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 52.9% 29.4% 15.7% 100.0% Jackson N % 0.9% 0.0% 1.8% 2.7% 40.7% 31.9% 22.1% 100.0% Kalamazoo N % 1.0% 16.0% 6.9% 8.1% 35.2% 19.9% 12.9% 100.0% Kalkaska N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% Kent N ,569 % 0.6% 25.7% 18.3% 4.1% 26.8% 15.6% 9.1% 100.0% Keweenaw N % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Lake N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% Lapeer N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 57.4% 26.5% 13.2% 100.0% Leelanau N % 0.0% 0.0% 2.3% 0.0% 48.8% 30.2% 18.6% 100.0% Lenawee N % 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 22.2% 44.4% 20.8% 100.0% Livingston N % 1.4% 0.0% 0.5% 1.8% 36.9% 35.0% 24.4% 100.0% Luce N % 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 100.0% Mackinac N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 37.5% 37.5% 100.0% Macomb N ,016 % 1.2% 2.0% 2.7% 3.3% 37.5% 35.5% 17.8% 100.0% Manistee N % 0.0% 0.0% 18.8% 0.0% 12.5% 50.0% 18.8% 100.0% 44
47 Active Michigan Residents in Private Practice by Firm Size and County, 2018 Private Practice Firm Size Not Very Large Medium Small Solo Solo Reported Large Full- Part Time Time Marquette N % 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 10.2% 56.8% 17.0% 12.5% 100.0% Mason N % 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 23.1% 23.1% 100.0% Mecosta N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% 42.3% 26.9% 26.9% 100.0% Menominee N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 58.3% 8.3% 100.0% Midland N % 0.0% 13.9% 2.8% 4.2% 44.4% 20.8% 13.9% 100.0% Missaukee N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% Monroe N % 1.1% 0.0% 2.3% 0.0% 44.3% 34.1% 18.2% 100.0% Montcalm N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 37.0% 48.1% 14.8% 100.0% Montmorency N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% Muskegon N % 0.0% 5.0% 4.3% 10.7% 38.6% 22.9% 18.6% 100.0% Newaygo N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 63.2% 26.3% 10.5% 100.0% Oakland N , ,955 1, ,553 % 1.1% 13.4% 16.8% 9.0% 29.8% 19.4% 10.5% 100.0% Oceana N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 35.3% 23.5% 41.2% 100.0% Ogemaw N % 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.3% 36.8% 26.3% 100.0% Ontonagon N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% Osceola N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 36.4% 36.4% 27.3% 100.0% Oscoda N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% 45
48 Active Michigan Residents in Private Practice by Firm Size and County, 2018 Private Practice Firm Size Not Very Large Medium Small Solo Solo Reported Large Full- Part Time Time Otsego N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 37.5% 12.5% 100.0% Ottawa N % 0.5% 6.3% 3.4% 18.0% 32.7% 24.4% 14.6% 100.0% Presque Isle N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 44.4% 55.6% 100.0% Roscommon N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 100.0% Saginaw N % 0.4% 1.9% 10.9% 4.7% 46.5% 24.4% 11.2% 100.0% Saint Clair N % 0.8% 0.8% 2.5% 0.0% 49.2% 29.7% 16.9% 100.0% Saint Joseph N % 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 41.2% 47.1% 8.8% 100.0% Sanilac N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 21.7% 47.8% 30.4% 100.0% Schoolcraft N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 100.0% Shiawassee N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.0% 24.2% 51.5% 21.2% 100.0% Tuscola N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 31.6% 31.6% 36.8% 100.0% Van Buren N % 0.0% 0.0% 4.8% 11.9% 19.0% 33.3% 31.0% 100.0% Washtenaw N % 1.5% 22.1% 7.8% 6.2% 25.1% 19.5% 17.8% 100.0% Wayne N ,799 % 1.2% 21.4% 9.3% 5.7% 24.9% 23.1% 14.5% 100.0% Wexford N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.4% 41.4% 41.4% 13.8% 100.0% N 185 2,323 1,979 1,126 5,531 4,129 2,404 17,677 % 1.0% 13.1% 11.2% 6.4% 31.3% 23.4% 13.6% 100.0% 46
49 Active Michigan Residents by Age Group and County, 2018 Age Group 29 or Under 30 to to to or Over Alcona N % 0.0% 7.7% 15.4% 15.4% 61.5% 100.0% Alger N % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% Allegan N % 0.7% 14.6% 16.1% 22.6% 46.0% 100.0% Alpena N % 0.0% 16.7% 8.3% 13.3% 61.7% 100.0% Antrim N % 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 6.9% 82.8% 100.0% Arenac N % 0.0% 23.1% 0.0% 23.1% 53.8% 100.0% Baraga N % 0.0% 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 60.0% 100.0% Barry N % 1.8% 12.5% 16.1% 28.6% 41.1% 100.0% Bay N % 1.7% 17.4% 16.3% 17.4% 47.2% 100.0% Benzie N % 0.0% 12.1% 15.2% 15.2% 57.6% 100.0% Berrien N % 1.4% 18.9% 16.4% 18.5% 44.8% 100.0% Branch N % 4.9% 14.6% 14.6% 19.5% 46.3% 100.0% Calhoun N % 2.3% 11.9% 22.4% 22.8% 40.6% 100.0% Cass N % 1.8% 12.5% 28.6% 16.1% 41.1% 100.0% Charlevoix N % 2.9% 10.3% 5.9% 14.7% 66.2% 100.0% Cheboygan N % 0.0% 3.7% 13.0% 16.7% 66.7% 100.0% 47
50 Active Michigan Residents by Age Group and County, 2018 Age Group 29 or Under 30 to to to or Over Chippewa N % 3.4% 15.5% 20.7% 17.2% 43.1% 100.0% Clare N % 5.4% 13.5% 21.6% 16.2% 43.2% 100.0% Clinton N % 1.7% 14.0% 8.3% 22.3% 53.7% 100.0% Crawford N % 0.0% 17.4% 21.7% 21.7% 39.1% 100.0% Delta N % 1.8% 16.4% 10.9% 10.9% 60.0% 100.0% Dickinson N % 2.2% 13.3% 15.6% 22.2% 46.7% 100.0% Eaton N % 2.2% 18.5% 16.2% 21.0% 42.0% 100.0% Emmet N % 0.0% 8.5% 14.7% 18.6% 58.1% 100.0% Genesee N % 1.8% 16.9% 17.9% 22.1% 41.3% 100.0% Gladwin N % 0.0% 9.5% 14.3% 14.3% 61.9% 100.0% Gogebic N % 0.0% 11.5% 15.4% 19.2% 53.8% 100.0% Grand Traverse N % 1.7% 18.5% 17.8% 22.1% 39.9% 100.0% Gratiot N % 0.0% 12.2% 34.1% 17.1% 36.6% 100.0% Hillsdale N % 3.3% 10.0% 13.3% 33.3% 40.0% 100.0% Houghton N % 0.0% 18.8% 18.8% 21.9% 40.6% 100.0% 48
Statewide and County Demographics
2017-2018 Statewide and County Demographics Statewide and County Membership Demographics 2017 Statewide Demographics All Active Members by US Residency... 1 All Active Members by Michigan Residency...
More informationDecember Jobless Rates Rise Seasonally in All Michigan Regional Labor Market Areas
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & BUDGET LANSING TRICIA L. FOSTER DIRECTOR FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Jan. 24, 2019 Contact: Caleb Buhs, 517-303-4038 or buhsc@michigan.gov
More informationMichigan s State Earned Income Tax Credit: Year One
Michigan League FOR Human Services September 2009 W Michigan s State Earned Income Tax : Year One ith the first tax year for Michigan s new Earned Income Tax () now over, data show that approximately 702,000
More informationNovember Unemployment Rates Decrease in Most of Michigan s Regional Labor Markets
STATE OF MICHIGAN RICK SNYDER DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & BUDGET DAVID B. BEHEN GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: December 30, 2014 Contact: Kurt Weiss, 517-335-0050 November
More informationPublic Spending for Selected Health and Social Programs in Michigan. By County, FY2004. August 2005
Tax Dollars at Work Public Spending for Selected Health and Social Programs in Michigan By County, FY2004 August 2005 Michigan League FOR Human Services 1115 S. Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 202, Lansing,
More informationJanuary 2019 Unemployment Rates Increase in All Michigan Regional Labor Market Areas
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & BUDGET LANSING TRICIA L. FOSTER DIRECTOR January 2019 Unemployment Rates Increase in All Michigan Regional Labor Market
More informationEMBargoed. until 10 am EDT Thursday, March 28, New Health Insurance Tax Credits in Michigan. Families USA
EMBargoed until 10 am EDT Thursday, March 28, 2013 New Health Insurance Tax Credits in Michigan Families USA Help Is at Hand: New Health Insurance Tax Credits in Michigan March 2013 by Families USA This
More informationPublic Spending for Selected Health and Social Programs in Michigan. By County, FY2006. September Michigan League FOR Human Services
Tax Dollars at Work Public Spending for Selected Health and Social Programs in Michigan By County, FY2006 September 2007 Michigan League FOR Human Services 1115 S. Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 202, Lansing,
More informationMedigap Outline of Coverage for Plans A, D, F, G and N
Medigap Outline of Coverage for Plans A, D, F, G and N Contents Understanding your premiums... 3 Choosing a plan is easy... 11 Coverage that meets your needs... 12 Learning more about your choices... 20
More informationMedigap. Outline of Coverage for Plans A, C, D, F, G and N
Medigap Outline of Coverage for Plans A, C, D, F, G and N Contents About Priority Health... 3 Choosing a plan is easy... 4 Coverage that meets your needs... 5 Learn more about your choices... 12 Understanding
More information2016 Michigan Small Business Owner Survey n=450, Margin of Error= ±4.6%
2016 Michigan Small Business Owner Survey n=450, Margin of Error= ±4.6% SCREENER SAMPLE: 450 telephone interview s am ong MInon-franchise sm a lbusiness ow ners or decision makers w ith ( 1-1 0 0 ) additionalemployees.
More informationPublic Spending for Selected Health and Social Programs in Michigan. By County, FY2008. August Michigan League FOR Human Services
Tax Dollars at Work Public Spending for Selected Health and Social Programs in Michigan By County, FY2008 August 2009 Michigan League FOR Human Services 1115 S. Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 202, Lansing,
More informationTHE LOST WORKERS. Michigan s Labor Force Down 326,000 Workers Since 2000
September 2017 Peter Ruark, Senior Policy Analyst THE LOST WORKERS I n July 2017, Michigan s monthly unemployment rate dropped to 3.7%. This was the lowest jobless rate since 2000, the state s best economic
More informationMICHIGAN INFANT DEATH STATISTICS January 1 through December 31, 2007
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH Division for Vital Records and Health Statistics MICHIGAN INFANT DEATH STATISTICS January 1 through December 31, 2007 LANSING, MICHIGAN JUNE 2009 Table Of Contents
More informationMICHIGAN INFANT DEATH STATISTICS January 1 through December 31, 2009
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH Division for Vital Records and Health Statistics MICHIGAN INFANT DEATH STATISTICS January 1 through December 31, 2009 LANSING, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY 2011 Table Of Contents
More informationPacket. Documents: SPBD PDF. Handout. Documents: HANDOUTS PDF
1. Packet Documents: SPBD 3-16-16.PDF 2. Handout Documents: HANDOUTS 3.17.16.PDF GRAND TRAVERSE COUNTY REPORT ON UNFUNDED PENSION & RETIREE HEALTH CARE LIABILITIES Prepared
More informationInsurance Options Summary
Insurance Options Summary For Public School Retirees Department of Technology, Management & Budget Your Health Plans The Office of Retirement Services strives to be good stewards of your pension and healthcare
More informationDEPARTMENT SER assists with burial when the decedent's estate, mandatory copays, etc. are not sufficient to pay for:
ERM 306 1 of 8 BURIALS DEPARTMENT POLICY SER assists with burial when the decedent's estate, mandatory copays, etc. are not sufficient to pay for: Burial. Cremation. Costs associated with donation of a
More informationIncapable due to illness.
ERM 306 1 of 11 BURIALS DEPARTMENT POLICY State Emergency Relief (SER) assists with burial when the decedent's estate, mandatory copays, etc. are not sufficient to pay for: Staff Responsibilities Burial.
More informationPoverty has a huge impact on the ability of
Michigan League FOR Human Services by Melissa K. Smith Senior Policy Analyst TIES THAT BIND: POVERTY AND MICHIGAN S ECONOMIC RECOVERY December 2011 Poverty has a huge impact on the ability of Michigan
More informationEconomic Benefits of the Earned Income Tax Credit in Michigan
August 13, 2009 Economic Benefits of the Earned Income Tax Credit in Michigan Commissioned by: Michigan Association of United Ways Community Economic Development Association of Michigan Prepared by: Caroline
More informationInsurance Options Summary
Insurance Options Summary For Public School Retirees Department of Technology, Management & Budget Your Health Plans The Office of Retirement Services strives to be good stewards of your pension and healthcare
More informationUMTRI Societal Costs of Traffic Crashes and Crime in Michigan: 2011 Update
UMTRI-2011-21 Societal Costs of es and Crime in Michigan: 2011 Update Lidia P. Kostyniuk Lisa J. Molnar Renée M. St. Louis Nicole Zanier David W. Eby UMTRI-2011-21 Societal Costs of es and Crime in Michigan:
More informationMyPriority. Individual & family health insurance plans
MyPriority SM Individual & family health insurance plans 2 For more information call 855.MyPriority (855.697.7467) Just right for you Choosing the right health insurance is an important decision. With
More informationMyPrioritySM. Individual & family health insurance plans
MyPrioritySM Individual & family health insurance plans 2 For more information call 855.MyPriority (855.697.7467) Just right for you Choosing the right health insurance is an important decision. With several
More informationMedicare Supplement Coverage offered by Blue Care Network of Michigan MyBlue Medigap SM Outline of Medigap coverage and enrollment application for
Medicare Supplement Coverage offered by Blue Care Network of Michigan MyBlue Medigap SM Outline of Medigap coverage and enrollment application for Plans A, C and F My life, My health plan bcbsm.com/mybluemedicare
More informationAPPENDIX I Employer Sample Frame
APPENDIX I Employer Sample Frame Table AI-1: Geopolitical Units (/City) Within Sample Regions 1 7 Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 Region 5 Region 6 Region 7 Southeast Southwest East Central West Central
More informationMay 29, Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw Highway Post Office Box Lansing, MI 48909
A CMS Energy Company May 29, 2018 Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw Highway Post Office Box 30221 Lansing, MI 48909 General Offices: LEGAL DEPARTMENT
More informationANTRIM COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
I ANTRIM COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 2016 Annual Report June 8, 2017 Submitted by Deborah Peters, Director Expenditures for 2016 We ended the year under budget by $1o,798.68 with total expenditures
More informationMSBO FACILITIES BENCHMARKING REPORT
MSBO FACILITIES BENCHMARKING REPORT By: Robert L. Moles, Applied Solutions For eight of the past ten calendar years, MSBO has published this facilities benchmarking report for use by business and facilities
More informationMSBO FACILITIES BENCHMARKING REPORT
MSBO FACILITIES BENCHMARKING REPORT February 2014 By: Robert L. Moles, Applied Solutions For ten of the past twelve calendar years, MSBO has published this facilities benchmarking report for use by business
More informationMICHIGAN LABORERS ANNUITY FUND. Summary Plan Description. September 2015
MICHIGAN LABORERS ANNUITY FUND Summary Plan Description September 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES... i FUND OFFICE, PLAN MANAGER, AND AGENT FOR SERVICE OF LEGAL PROCESS... ii PLAN LEGAL COUNSEL...
More informationAnnual Notice of Changes for 2018
Blue Cross Medicare Private Fee for Service (PFFS) offered by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Annual Notice of Changes for 2018 You are currently enrolled as a member of Blue Cross Medicare Private
More informationEssential, Vitality, Signature, and Assure. January 1, 2017 December 31, 2017
Medicare Plus Blue SM PPO Confidence comes with every card. 2017 Summary of Benefits Essential, Vitality, Signature, and Assure January 1, 2017 December 31, 2017 This information is not a complete description
More information2018 BERRIEN COUNTY EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT / EQUALIZATION REPORT
2018 BERRIEN COUNTY EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT / EQUALIZATION REPORT EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT DEPARTMENT FUNCTIONS Main Function of the Equalization Department The Equalization
More informationMaking Ends Meet in Michigan: A Basic Needs Income Level for Family Well-Being
Making Ends Meet in Michigan: A Basic Needs Income Level for Family Well-Being May 2017 THE LEAGUE S MISSION To ensure economic security and well-being for all people in Michigan through policy change.
More informationState Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/Credits, 2011
Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/s, 2011 Elderly Handicapped Blind Deaf Disabled FEDERAL Exemption $3,700 $7,400 $3,700 $7,400 $0 $3,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 Alabama Exemption $1,500 $3,000 $1,500 $3,000
More informationIncome from U.S. Government Obligations
Baird s ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Enclosed is the 2017 Tax Form for your account with
More informationCheckpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources
Checkpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources Alabama Alaska Announcements Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Source Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act ( FATCA ) Under Chapter 4 of the Code
More informationKentucky , ,349 55,446 95,337 91,006 2,427 1, ,349, ,306,236 5,176,360 2,867,000 1,462
TABLE B MEMBERSHIP AND BENEFIT OPERATIONS OF STATE-ADMINISTERED EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, LAST MONTH OF FISCAL YEAR: MARCH 2003 Beneficiaries receiving periodic benefit payments Periodic benefit payments
More informationAnnual Costs Cost of Care. Home Health Care
2017 Cost of Care Home Health Care USA National $18,304 $47,934 $114,400 3% $18,304 $49,192 $125,748 3% Alaska $33,176 $59,488 $73,216 1% $36,608 $63,492 $73,216 2% Alabama $29,744 $38,553 $52,624 1% $29,744
More informationA Closer Look. Local Government OPEB (Other Postemployment Benefits) in Michigan. MSU Extension White Paper
Local Government OPEB (Other Postemployment Benefits) in Michigan A Closer Look MSU Extension White Paper By: Dr. Eric A. Scorsone, Michigan State University Extension Specialist, State and Local Government
More informationIndividual Income Tax
2011 Michigan Individual Income Tax MI-1040CR-7 Home Heating Credit Claim www.michigan.gov/taxes aa E-file your Michigan Home Heating Credit Claim (MI-1040CR-7) with or without a Michigan Individual Income
More informationEBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation
EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation UPDATED July 2014 This chapter looks at the percentage of American workers who work for an employer who sponsors
More informationWant a quote? Call your broker.
Want a quote? Call your broker. 2008 Aetna Inc. AA.02.311.1-MI (7/08) Take charge of your health. We re here to help. Aetna Advantage plans for individuals, families and the self-employed Michigan A guide
More informationPay Frequency and Final Pay Provisions
Pay Frequency and Final Pay Provisions State Pay Frequency Minimum Final Pay Resign Final Pay Terminated Alabama Bi-weekly or semi-monthly No Provision No Provision Alaska Semi-monthly or monthly Next
More informationUnion Members in New York and New Jersey 2018
For Release: Friday, March 29, 2019 19-528-NEW NEW YORK NEW JERSEY INFORMATION OFFICE: New York City, N.Y. Technical information: (646) 264-3600 BLSinfoNY@bls.gov www.bls.gov/regions/new-york-new-jersey
More informationUndocumented Immigrants are:
Immigrants are: Current vs. Full Legal Status for All Immigrants Appendix 1: Detailed State and Local Tax Contributions of Total Immigrant Population Current vs. Full Legal Status for All Immigrants
More informationAIG Benefit Solutions Producer Licensing and Appointment Requirements by State
3600 Route 66, Mail Stop 4J, Neptune, NJ 07754 AIG Benefit Solutions Producer Licensing and Appointment Requirements by State As an industry leader in the group insurance benefits market, AIG is firmly
More informationTermination Final Pay Requirements
State Involuntary Termination Voluntary Resignation Vacation Payout Requirement Alabama No specific regulations currently exist. No specific regulations currently exist. if the employer s policy provides
More informationSales Tax Return Filing Thresholds by State
Thanks to R&M Consulting for assistance in putting this together Sales Tax Return Filing Thresholds by State State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Filing Thresholds
More informationThe Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue
FISCAL April 2009 No. 166 FACT The Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue By Patrick Fleenor Today the federal cigarette tax will rise from 39 cents to $1.01 per pack. The proceeds
More informationState Income Tax Tables
ALABAMA 1 st $1,000... 2% Next 5,000... 4% Over 6,000... 5% ALASKA... 0% ARIZONA 1 1 st $10,000... 2.87% Next 15,000... 3.2% Next 25,000... 3.74% Next 100,000... 4.72% Over 150,000... 5.04% ARKANSAS 1
More informationMotor Vehicle Sales/Use, Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart-2005
The following is a Motor Vehicle Sales/Use Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart which you may find helpful in determining the Sales/Use Tax liability of your customers who either purchase vehicles outside of
More informationTHE ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC OUTLOOK
1 THE ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC OUTLOOK FOR MICHIGAN THROUGH 2045 Prepared for Bureau of Transportation Planning Michigan Department of Transportation Prepared by Donald R. Grimes George A. Fulton Institute
More informationTHE SELF-SUFFICIENCY STANDARD FOR MICHIGAN Prepared by UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK
THE SELF-SUFFICIENCY STANDARD FOR MICHIGAN 2017 Prepared by UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK THE FOOD BANK COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN The Food Bank Council of Michigan (FBCM) was founded in 1984
More informationImpacts of Prepayment Penalties and Balloon Loans on Foreclosure Starts, in Selected States: Supplemental Tables
THE UNIVERSITY NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL T H E F R A N K H A W K I N S K E N A N I N S T I T U T E DR. MICHAEL A. STEGMAN, DIRECTOR T 919-962-8201 OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CAPITALISM
More informationFederal Rates and Limits
Federal s and Limits FICA Social Security (OASDI) Base $118,500 Medicare (HI) Base No Limit Social Security (OASDI) Percentage 6.20% Medicare (HI) Percentage Maximum Employee Social Security (OASDI) Withholding
More informationThe Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects of Recent Regulation of Debit Card Interchange Fees. Robert J. Shapiro
The Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects of Recent Regulation of Debit Card Interchange Fees Robert J. Shapiro October 1, 2013 The Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects
More informationState Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply
Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply Nicholas W. Jenny and Donald J. Boyd The Rockefeller Institute Fiscal News: Vol. 1, No. 3 July 26, 2001 According to a report from the Congressional Budget
More informationThe table below reflects state minimum wages in effect for 2014, as well as future increases. State Wage Tied to Federal Minimum Wage *
State Minimum Wages The table below reflects state minimum wages in effect for 2014, as well as future increases. Summary: As of Jan. 1, 2014, 21 states and D.C. have minimum wages above the federal minimum
More informationNOTICE TO MEMBERS CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CORPORATION CANADIENNE DE. Trading by U.S. Residents
NOTICE TO MEMBERS CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CORPORATION CANADIENNE DE CLEARING CORPORATION COMPENSATION DE PRODUITS DÉRIVÉS NOTICE TO MEMBERS No. 2002-013 January 28, 2002 Trading by U.S. Residents This is
More informationResidual Income Requirements
Residual Income Requirements ytzhxrnmwlzh Ch. 4, 9-e: Item 44, Balance Available for Family Support (04/10/09) Enter the appropriate residual income amount from the following tables in the guideline box.
More informationMEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS
MEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS Under federal law, states have the option of creating Medicaid buy-in programs that enable employed individuals with disabilities who make more than what is allowed under Section
More informationALICE IN MICHIGAN: A FINANCIAL HARDSHIP STUDY 2019 MICHIGAN REPORT
ALICE IN MICHIGAN: A FINANCIAL HARDSHIP STUDY 2019 MICHIGAN REPORT THE UNITED WAYS OF MICHIGAN Albion-Homer United Way Allegan County United Way Barry County United Way Branch County United Way Capital
More informationUnderstanding Oregon s Throwback Rule for Apportioning Corporate Income
Understanding Oregon s Throwback Rule for Apportioning Corporate Income Senate Interim Committee on Finance and Revenue January 12, 2018 2 Apportioning Corporate Income Apportionment is a method of dividing
More informationQ Homeowner Confidence Survey Results. May 20, 2010
Q1 2010 Homeowner Confidence Survey Results May 20, 2010 The Zillow Homeowner Confidence Survey is fielded quarterly to determine the confidence level of American homeowners when it comes to the value
More informationFingerprint, Biographical Affidavit and Third-Party Verification Reports Requirements
Updates to the State Specific Information Fingerprint, Biographical Affidavit and Third-Party Verification Reports Requirements State Requirements For Licensure Requirements After Licensure (Non-Domestic)
More informationNation s Uninsured Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016
Nation s Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016 by Joan Alker and Olivia Pham The number of uninsured children nationwide dropped to another historic low in 2016 with approximately 250,000
More informationAbility-to-Repay Statutes
Ability-to-Repay Statutes FEDERAL ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA STATUTE Truth in Lending, Regulation Z Consumer Credit Secure and Fair Enforcement for Bankers, Brokers, and Loan Originators
More informationSURVEY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS IN MICHIGAN
Citizens Research Council of Michigan SURVEY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS IN MICHIGAN 2ND EDITION June 2007 Repor ort 347 CITIZENS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN MAIN OFFICE 38777 West Six Mile Road,
More informationManufactured Home VA Standard
MATRIX: Primary Residence Owner Occupied Transaction Number of Units Maximum LTV/CLTV Purchase 1 Unit 100% Cash-Out Refinance 1 Unit 100% FICO Score Requirements Description FICO Minimum FICO 580. Manufactured
More informationTA X FACTS NORTHERN FUNDS 2O17
TA X FACTS 2O17 Northern Funds Tax Facts provides specific information about your Northern Funds investment income and capital gain distributions for 2017. If you have any questions about how to apply
More informationPAY STATEMENT REQUIREMENTS
PAY MENT 2017 PAY MENT Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia No generally applicable wage payment law for private employers. Rate
More informationFederal Registry. NMLS Federal Registry Quarterly Report Quarter I
Federal Registry NMLS Federal Registry Quarterly Report 2012 Quarter I Updated June 6, 2012 Conference of State Bank Supervisors 1129 20 th Street, NW, 9 th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036-4307 NMLS Federal
More informationA d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n INSURANCE COVERAGE AND CLAIMS INSTITUTE APRIL 3 5, 2019 CHICAGO, IL Delaware Georgia Louisiana Mississippi New Hampshire North Carolina (hours ethics
More informationATHENE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities
Rates Effective August 8, 05 ATHE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities State Availability Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas Product Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire California PE New Jersey
More informationFingerprint and Biographical Affidavit Requirements
Updates to the State-Specific Information Fingerprint and Biographical Affidavit Requirements State Requirements For Licensure Requirements After Licensure (Non-Domestic) Alabama NAIC biographical affidavit
More informationRequired Training Completion Date. Asset Protection Reciprocity
Completion Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California State Certification: must complete initial 16 hours (8 hrs of general LTC CE and 8 hrs of classroom-only CE specifically on the CA for LTC prior to
More informationDFA INVESTMENT DIMENSIONS GROUP INC. DIMENSIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP INC. Institutional Class Shares January 2018
DFA INVESTMENT DIMENSIONS GROUP INC. DIMENSIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP INC. Institutional Class Shares January 2018 Supplementary Tax Information 2017 The following supplementary information may be useful in
More informationS T A T E INSURANCE COVERAGE AND PRACTICE SYMPOSIUM DECEMBER 7 8, 2017 NEW YORK, NY. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n INSURANCE COVERAGE AND PRACTICE SYMPOSIUM DECEMBER 7 8, 2017 NEW YORK, NY Delaware Pending Georgia Pending Louisiana Pending Mississippi 12.00 New
More informationSECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance
SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the agencies)
More informationMapping the geography of retirement savings
of savings A comparative analysis of retirement savings data by state based on information gathered from over 60,000 individuals who have used the VoyaCompareMe online tool. Mapping the geography of retirement
More information# of Credit Unions As of March 31, 2011
# of Credit Unions # of Credit Unins # of Credit Unions As of March 31, 2011 8,600 8,400 8,200 8,000 8,478 8,215 7,800 7,909 7,600 7,400 7,651 7,442 7,200 7,000 6,800 # of Credit Unions -Trend By Asset-Based
More informationS T A T E TURNING THE TABLES ON PLAINTIFFS IN TRUCKING LITIGATION APRIL 26 27, 2018 CHICAGO, IL. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n TURNING THE TABLES ON PLAINTIFFS IN TRUCKING LITIGATION APRIL 26 27, 2018 CHICAGO, IL Delaware Georgia Louisiana Mississippi New Hampshire North Carolina
More informationSTATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES
2017 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes minimum wage and overtime requirements for most employers in the private sector
More informationA d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n STRIKING BACK AGAINST THE REPTILE IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND LONG TERM CARE CASES JUNE 13, 2018 CHICAGO, IL S T A T E Delaware Georgia Louisiana Mississippi
More informationA d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. Pending. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency.
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n STRIKING BACK AGAINST THE REPTILE IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND LONG TERM CARE CASES JUNE 13, 2018 CHICAGO, IL P O S T S E M I N A R A C T I O N Delaware
More informationProviding Subprime Consumers with Access to Credit: Helpful or Harmful? James R. Barth Auburn University
Providing Subprime Consumers with Access to Credit: Helpful or Harmful? James R. Barth Auburn University FICO Scores: Identifying Subprime Consumers Category FICO Score Range Super-prime 740 and Higher
More informationState Minimum Wage Chart (See below for Local/City Minimum Wage Chart)
State Current Minimum Wage State Minimum Wage Chart (See below for Local/City Minimum Wage Chart) Maximum Tip Credit Allowed for Tipped Employees Federal $7.25 $5.12 $2.13 Minimum Cash Wage for Tipped
More information2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes
2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes Dear Valued ADP Client, Beginning with your first payroll with checks dated in 2012, you and your employees may notice changes in your paychecks due to updated 2012
More informationA d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n NURSING HOME/ALF LITIGATION SEPTEMBER 13 14, 2018 NEW ORLEANS, LA Delaware Georgia Louisiana Mississippi New Hampshire North Carolina (hours ethics
More informationMinimum Wage Laws in the States - April 3, 2006
1 of 15 Wage Laws in the States - April 3, 2006 Note: Where Federal and state law have different minimum wage rates, the higher standard applies. Wage and Overtime Standards Applicable to Nonsupervisory
More informationWhite Paper 2018 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES
White Paper STATE AND FEDERAL S White Paper STATE AND FEDERAL S The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes minimum wage and overtime requirements for most employers in the private sector and
More informationKey Facts: NATIONAL WOMEN S LAW CENTER FACT SHEET JAN 2018
NATIONAL WOMEN S LAW CENTER FACT SHEET JAN 2018 WORKPLACE JUSTICE PUBLIC SECTOR UNIONS PROMOTE ECONOMIC SECURITY AND EQUALITY FOR WOMEN Kayla Patrick Public sector unions are crucial to the economic security
More informationAudited Financial Statements. And Other Financial Information. Special Olympics Michigan, Inc.
Audited Financial Statements And Other Financial Information Special Olympics Michigan, Inc. Year ended December 31, 2014 With Report of Independent Auditors Audited Financial Statements and Other Financial
More informationIMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION
IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION The following information about your enclosed 1099-DIV from s should be used when preparing your 2017 tax return. Form 1099-DIV reports dividends, exempt-interest dividends, capital
More informationFAPRI Analysis of Dairy Policy Options for the 2002 Farm Bill Conference
FAPRI Analysis of Dairy Policy Options for the 2002 Farm Bill Conference FAPRI-UMC Report #04-02 April 11, 2002 Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute University of Missouri 101 South Fifth Street
More informationBRINKER CAPITAL DESTINATIONS TRUST
Important 2018 Tax Information Regarding Your Mutual s BRINKER CAPITAL DESTINATIONS TRUST The following tax information is furnished for informational purposes only. Please consult your tax advisor for
More informationBy: Adelle Simmons and Laura Skopec ASPE
ASPE RESEARCH BRIEF 47 MILLION WOMEN WILL HAVE GUARANTEED ACCESS TO WOMEN S PREVENTIVE SERVICES WITH ZERO COST-SHARING UNDER THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT By: Adelle Simmons and Laura Skopec ASPE The Affordable
More information